Re: [lfs-support] Can't access my sources directory to install build files
On 02/06/13 21:15, scott maxwell wrote: I keep getting stuck in LFS 7.3. Never gotten past Binutils 2nd pass. Now I have all the tar files in the sources folder on the new LFS partition but cant get to it from mnt/lfs/sources. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Current host os is Mint 14. Thanks. What dose echo $LFS return what dose ls -l /sources return -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Can't get LFS to boot, fsck.ext4 no such file or directory while trying to open ....
On 24/03/13 00:57, TJ Olaes wrote: Good evening. Hope someone can help me see something I'm missing, I've been googling all day trying to get LFS to boot up and have made some progress but this one is stumping me. Currently, I have at least one problem, which is that the boot sequence fails at this point: Checking file systems...fsck.ext4: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hda8 What I'm doing right now is booting from the grub command line, a la: grub set ... snip some variable lines ... prefix=(hd0,msdos1)/grub root=hd0,1 ... snip more stuff ... grub linux /vmlinux-3.8.3-lfs-7.3 root=/dev/sda8 grub boot My config: /dev/hda1 is an ext4 boot partition named boot /dev/hda5 is an ext4 partition for usr /dev/hda6 is ext4 for opt /dev/hda7 is ext4 for src /dev/hda8 is the ext4 root partition /dev/hda9 is ext4 for home I'm using Grub2 v1.99. Thanks for any help I can get. -TJ Is this a typo grub linux /vmlinu*_x_*-3.8.3-lfs-7.3 root=/dev/sda8 cp -v arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinu_z_-3.8.1-lfs-7.3 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] make error in Coreutils
On 13/03/13 17:47, Rubin Saifi wrote:
here is the error
--
root:/sources/coreutils-8.19# make
CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}: cd . /bin/sh
/sources/coreutils-8.19/build-aux/missing aclocal-1.12a -I m4
/sources/coreutils-8.19/build-aux/missing: line 81: aclocal-1.12a:
command not found
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.12a' is missing on your system.
You should only need it if you modified 'acinclude.m4' or
'configure.ac' or m4 files included by 'configure.ac'.
The 'aclocal' program is part of the GNU Automake package:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake
It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and Perl in order to run:
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf
http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/
http://www.perl.org/
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127
any help plz.
Do you have m4 installed on host maybe post the output of the version-script
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Ubuntu 12.10 install
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote: Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times tried. Maybe post the output of the version-script -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Ubuntu 12.10 install
On 03/03/13 19:51, Keith Clark wrote: On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote: On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote: Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times tried. Maybe post the output of the version-script version-check.sh output can be found here: pastebin.ca/2327809 You need to fix /bin/sh - /bin/dash it should be /bin/sh - /bin/bash -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Ubuntu 12.10 install
On 03/03/13 20:31, Keith Clark wrote: On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote: On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote: On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote: On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote: Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times tried. Maybe post the output of the version-script version-check.sh output can be found here: pastebin.ca/2327809 /bin/sh - /bin/dash is no good /bin/sh must be a symlink to /bin/bash (see the book ;o) )... Myou Where is that in the book? It,s in chapter 5.3 the 1st important notice -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Ubuntu 12.10 install
On 03/03/13 20:58, Keith Clark wrote: On 13-03-03 03:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Keith Clark wrote: On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote: On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote: Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times tried. Maybe post the output of the version-script version-check.sh output can be found herev /bin. pastebin.ca/2327809 /bin/sh - /bin/dash is wrong. run (as root) ln -sfn /bin/bash sh -- Bruce I get the following: ln: failed to create symbolic link `sh': No such file or directory rm -v /bin/sh ln -sv /bin/bash /bin/sh -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Booting LFS Error Kernel Panic
On 18/12/12 01:24, Alexander Spitzer wrote:
Hello all,
I am having a hard time booting my LFS system, which is on a USB
drive. I installed grub on /dev/sdc (the usb relative to the host) and
the bios successfully finds GRUB. After around 2.3 seconds, the boot
process hangs after printing what I believe to be a trace call.
Interestingly, one time when I booted the trace call was short enough
for me to write down the error which I can't normally see due to the
length of the trace prints. Here is the error:
Kernel panic-not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown
block(0,0)
What exactly does unknown block(0,0) mean?
The problem appears to be that the kernel can't find the root file
system. How can that be a problem, if the kernel, which is ON the root
file system, was found and ran?
Here is the grub.cfg file:
# Begin /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set default=0
set timeout=5
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,1)
menuentry GNU/Linux, Linux 3.7-lfs-SVN-20121212 {
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.7-lfs-SVN-20121212 root=/dev/sda1 ro
}
I believe the USB is always sda because to boot I do a manual boot
override and select USB from the BIOS menu. The grub command line also
confirms this.
Searching online, there were some suggestions that the kernel was
compiled without support for necessary file systems and hardware. I
check my config file for the kernel and found all the important
options to be set to yes (USB_mass_storage, ext3 filesystem, USB UHCI,
USB OHCI, and several scsi ones). There are however many USB options
that are not set. Are there any specific ones that should be set for
the kernel to load the root filesystem?
Also, I've tried unsuccessfully to read more of the boot output by two
methods: increasing the resolution and scrolling back. The scroll back
buffer is set to yes in the kernel config yet shift page down and
shift page up do nothing. Also, vga=791 is deprecated and I haven't
been able to get any effect by using set vgxpayload=1024x728.
How can I read the boot print outputs without a high speed camera?
Thanks,
Alex
Hi
This is my grub.cfg which is on usb drive that works
# Begin /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set default=0
set timeout=5
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,1)
menuentry Planet-Spike7 {
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.2-lfs-7.0 root=/dev/sdc1 rootdelay=5 ro
}
the rootdelay seems to be the cure tou might want to try 10 instaed of 5
then adjust it.
It takes time for the usb to recognised
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz
On 23/11/12 22:23, Thomas de Roo wrote: Hi all, Does anybody know of an alternative source for xz? http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz seems to be down. Groet, Thomas Whats the problem with that ? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz
On 23/11/12 22:34, spiky wrote: On 23/11/12 22:23, Thomas de Roo wrote: Hi all, Does anybody know of an alternative source for xz? http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4.tar.xz seems to be down. Groet, Thomas Whats the problem with that ? ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/../pub/lfs/lfs-packages/7.2/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Kernel panic lfs-7.2
On 25/10/12 23:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote: spiky wrote: On 25/10/12 22:50, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:03:46PM +0100, spiky wrote: Hi Ok I,m having real trouble booting my lfs system. Long storey with lfs 7.2 won I rebuilt the kernel after moving to new laptop. Root is on sda3 ext4 only 1 harddrive, sda1 will be boot NOT used at moment sda2 extended partition I have not run grub-install No grub.cfg file yet. Hence why I,m using grub prompt which I should be able to boot from Also the tab complition at grub prompt shows the correct paths to vmlinuz. I will run grub-install tomorrow But when i done all this on the orginall lfs 7.2 I still ended up with the same panic. FYI I have set ext4 in kernel config and the mount dev at boot which is also in fstab Booting from grub prompt File systems should be configured in kernel ok. Drivers I have tried various drivers for radeon graphics card. Even from the grub prompt, you still need to specify the root partition: linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.3-rc1-lfs-7.0 root=/dev/sda3 -- Bruce I managed to get lfs 7.0 booted then saved the kernel config re dd lfs 7.2 rebuilt 3.3 kernel using make oldconfig which then booted then built kernel 3.7 all sorted. I would like to thk Bruce and Ken It was both of the problems, drivers and root=/dev/sda3. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] Kernel panic lfs-7.2
Hi Ok I,m having real trouble booting my lfs system. Long storey with lfs 7.2 wont boot, I have now dd a working lfs-7.0 system, from another laptop which I have done before. on to this laptop replacing 7.2. I adjusted fstab file as needed for new partitions. I have tried booting from grub prompt (host grub) set root=(hd0,3) linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.3-rc1-lfs-7.0 boot I get a kernel panic VFS unable to mount root fs via NFS trying floppy VFS cannot open root device (null) or unknown-block(2,0) please append a correct root= boot option here are availble partitions then it lists the sda partitions. I got the same panic with the lfs 7.2 install, I have rebuilt the kernel many times different configurations. I have built lfs since 6.7 and always got them to boot, this is the 1st time I have built on this laptop, Nothing special about this laptop. Would really like to get this fixed Thks -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Kernel panic lfs-7.2
On 25/10/12 22:50, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:03:46PM +0100, spiky wrote: Hi Ok I,m having real trouble booting my lfs system. Long storey with lfs 7.2 wont boot, I have now dd a working lfs-7.0 system, from another laptop which I have done before. on to this laptop replacing 7.2. I adjusted fstab file as needed for new partitions. I have tried booting from grub prompt (host grub) set root=(hd0,3) linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.3-rc1-lfs-7.0 boot I get a kernel panic VFS unable to mount root fs via NFS trying floppy VFS cannot open root device (null) or unknown-block(2,0) please append a correct root= boot option here are availble partitions then it lists the sda partitions. I got the same panic with the lfs 7.2 install, I have rebuilt the kernel many times different configurations. I have built lfs since 6.7 and always got them to boot, this is the 1st time I have built on this laptop, Nothing special about this laptop. I rebuilt the kernel Would really like to get this fixed Thks I think the root of your problem is that you have no previous good .config for _this_ laptop. As we always say, both the filesystems and device drivers that are required to boot need to be built in to the kernel. But something about your report is odd - you say it lists the sda partitions (and I assume that is the correct drive), and I also assume you aren't using a different filesystem for '/' on this machine. Did you perhaps specify root=/dev/hdXN instead of /dev/sdaN in grub.cfg ? ĸen I rebuilt the kernel after moving to new laptop. Root is on sda3 ext4 only 1 harddrive, sda1 will be boot NOT used at moment sda2 extended partition I have not run grub-install No grub.cfg file yet. Hence why I,m using grub prompt which I should be able to boot from Also the tab complition at grub prompt shows the correct paths to vmlinuz. I will run grub-install tomorrow But when i done all this on the orginall lfs 7.2 I still ended up with the same panic. FYI I have set ext4 in kernel config and the mount dev at boot which is also in fstab Booting from grub prompt File systems should be configured in kernel ok. Drivers I have tried various drivers for radeon graphics card. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5.4 Binutils-2.22 Patch issue
On 13/10/12 20:10, San blue wrote: Hi Colleagues, When i'm executing the patch for Binutils-2.22, i'm getting the below error : -- lfs:/mnt/lfs/tools$ patch -Np1 -i ../sources/binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch can't find file to patch at input line 11 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |Submitted By:Matt Burgessmatthew_at_linuxfromscratch_dot_org |Date:2012-03-27 |Initial Package Version: 2.22 |Upstream Status: From Upstream |Origin: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2011-10/msg00241.html |Description: Fixes a build failure when using -O3 compiler flag | |diff -Naur binutils-2.22.orig/opcodes/ChangeLog binutils-2.22/opcodes/ChangeLog |--- binutils-2.22.orig/opcodes/ChangeLog 2011-11-21 09:29:39.0 + |+++ binutils-2.22/opcodes/ChangeLog2012-03-27 19:49:36.299866714 + -- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored can't find file to patch at input line 26 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |diff -Naur binutils-2.22.orig/opcodes/i386-dis.c binutils-2.22/opcodes/i386-dis.c |--- binutils-2.22.orig/opcodes/i386-dis.c 2011-08-02 19:58:06.0 + |+++ binutils-2.22/opcodes/i386-dis.c 2012-03-27 19:48:28.447812481 + -- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored - Please suggest me what can be done to solve this issue ? or does it really required ? Best regards, San What dir are you in when you run the command?? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] chapter06/inetutils link error
Page http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/inetutils.html there is a link http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/inetutils.html that returns page not found -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Compiling GCC pass 1 of Linux From Scratch
On 08/10/12 13:08, Arvind S Raj wrote: Hello everyone, I'm trying Linux from scratch and am really excited about it. I have encountered an error when I compile GCC. The error is http://paste.pound-python.org/show/26539/. I noticed that many others have faced this error(a few threads in the GCC mailing list) and there is a thread in LFS mailing list too but none have a solution(at least the ones I looked at). Could anyone help me out here by pointing me to right direction? Some info on the Ubuntu 12.04 machine I'm running. If any more information is required, do let me know and I'll gladly provide the same. Linux 3.2.0-31-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 7 16:16:45 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.6/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.6 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.6 --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-plugin --enable-objc-gc --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) -- Arvind S Raj Research Associate Amrita Centre for Cyber Security, Amritapuri http://arvindsraj.wordpress.com http://arvindsraj.wordpress.com/ I would post the output of host system requirements http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.2/prologue/hostreqs.html That info would help to start with -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS vs. LFS LiveCD
On 20/09/12 18:55, Wally Lepore wrote: Hi Members, I do hope this is the correct mailing list. My question pertains to LFS and the LFS LiveCD but the mailing list for the LiveCD no longer appears active. Thank you for taking my question please. I've been studying Linux for awhile now and would like to utilize the LFS system to build a Linux distro and also to learn the concepts of structure and construction that will also enable me to help/join a development team on a particular existing distro. Can you please tell me if the LFS LiveCD is still a valid tool to utilize in learning the how to of building a linux distro. I read that the LFS LiveCD is no longer supported and the LiveCD is not available for version 7.0 and later. In other words, can I still build an LFS distro that is fully functional in today's environment using the last supported version of the LFS LiveCD? Or... Is it better to go with the latest version and install the LFS system to a hard drive that has a host distro installed? I did read the benefits of using the LiveCd versus installing to a host distro on the LFS FAQ. Any suggestions would surely help as I take my first step. Thank you Kindly Wally Lepore New Jersey Yes that is correct about the live cd it is out of date now. You would be better using a distro installed as host, any distro will work as long as it is made compliant http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.2/prologue/hostreqs.html I have also used a live cd from a production distro which I made compliant. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS Book 7 | chapter 7 what to ignore
On 02/09/12 11:05, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: Ok, so I managed to do up to the chapter 6 and now reading through the chapter 7. In section 7.2 it says that I can ignore this section if I only has one network interface, so basically the entire section 7.2 I can ignore (7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.3). And my question is doesn't this section 7.2 relates to section 7.3 or further? Or the sections are not related in their own context. Thanks, Oshadha. It dose say This section only applies if a network card is to be configured. _If a network card will not be used_, there is likely no need to create any configuration files relating to network cards. If that is the case, remove the |network| symlinks from all run-level directories (|/etc/rc.d/rc*.d|) will you be using a network? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS Book 7 | chapter 7 what to ignore
On 02/09/12 11:30, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: I'm not using any network cards specifically. On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:41 PM, spiky martynvid...@aol.com mailto:martynvid...@aol.com wrote: On 02/09/12 11:05, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: Ok, so I managed to do up to the chapter 6 and now reading through the chapter 7. In section 7.2 it says that I can ignore this section if I only has one network interface, so basically the entire section 7.2 I can ignore (7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.3). And my question is doesn't this section 7.2 relates to section 7.3 or further? Or the sections are not related in their own context. Thanks, Oshadha. It dose say This section only applies if a network card is to be configured. _If a network card will not be used_, there is likely no need to create any configuration files relating to network cards. If that is the case, remove the |network| symlinks from all run-level directories (|/etc/rc.d/rc*.d|) will you be using a network? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page If no network then you wont need that section then as there is nothing to setup also chapter 7.3 is not needed -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Kernel is not booting
On 14/07/12 16:14, gmspro wrote:
#grub.cfg
menuentry 'Custom' {
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(hd1,msdos8)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set
2d1bcc50-c7f9-4d2a-8ab4-dba8795b78e9
linux/boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sdb8 rootfstype=ext4 ro quiet
}
What's wrong here?
Is this a usb device you are trying to boot?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Q: best choice of Live CD to host/rescue LFS?
On 08/07/12 19:44, Yasser Zamani wrote: Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 18:18:21 +0100 From: onepo...@starurchin.org To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Q: best choice of Live CD to host/rescue LFS? Yasser Zamani wrote: I recommend Slax (http://www.slax.org/get_slax.php/); I gracefully finished LFS with that as host. I ran the verson check script in Slax and it could not find bison, yacc or makeinfo. Did you customise slax with extra packages? No. I learned from LFS that I can install packages to a specific folder by using --prefix=PATH. I also know that when we install a package in LFS environment at section 5, it looks for dependencies in two places: The Host and the /tools. In another side of coin, Slax is a live cd and does not save installations on it's virtual file system. So, I think with these information the solution is simple. It is installing missed packages to /tools via host before continuing to enter LFS environment at section 5. i.e. 1) Ignore version check script and continue with book until finishing and the end of section 4.2. Creating the $LFS/tools Directory. 2) Install missed packages just like instructions at section 5.X. but from the host not lfs user. Appendice C. Dependencies can be very helpful at this time 3) When installation to /tools done, add /tools to your host's PATH and re-run version check script. You'll see it recognize installed packages ;) 4) Skip section 4.3. Adding the LFS User because as I said Slax does not save changes to it's virtual file system. 5) While you skipped adding the lfs user, you should enter lfs environment by just coping and pasting scripts at 4.4. Setting Up the Environment and running them in console. I mean you should not include cat X EOF and EOF. Now all things are ready to continue with rest of the book but remember if you rebooted, you should do following again: 1) 2.4. Mounting the New Partition 2) 4.2. Creating the $LFS/tools Directory (just ln -sv $LFS/tools /) 3) 4.4. Setting Up the Environment (you should not include cat X EOFand EOF) Good Luck! Regards, Jeremy Henty -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page I found this on making slax cd persistent 4th post http://www.slax.org/forum.php?action=viewparentID=27065 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Problem following LFS Version 7.1 - 6.7 Linux-3.2.6 API Header
On 04/07/12 20:52, Toby Ferguson wrote: I finished 6.6 Creating Essential Files and Symlinks. All seems good. But when I get to chapter 6.7 I have no idea what to do - there's no makefile around, and none under the / directory, so far as I can tell. It seems to me that there're some instructions missing or that I've skipped, but I can't find them. The Errata for this version don't indicate a problem here, so I'm stuck. Can you tell me what to do? -- toby You done the same in chapter 5.6 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Problem following LFS Version 7.1 - 6.7 Linux-3.2.6 API Header
On 04/07/12 21:15, Toby Ferguson wrote: Ah - I thought I'd installed everything - so you're saying I have to do the 'unpack/cd/install/rm' cycle, but as the root user in the chroot'd environment? OK - I can do that I guess. Thanks. Toby On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, spiky martynvid...@aol.com mailto:martynvid...@aol.com wrote: On 04/07/12 20:52, Toby Ferguson wrote: I finished 6.6 Creating Essential Files and Symlinks. All seems good. But when I get to chapter 6.7 I have no idea what to do - there's no makefile around, and none under the / directory, so far as I can tell. It seems to me that there're some instructions missing or that I've skipped, but I can't find them. The Errata for this version don't indicate a problem here, so I'm stuck. Can you tell me what to do? -- toby You done the same in chapter 5.6 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- toby Yes, You havn't finished yet. Also can you not top post it,s prefered to post at the end so ppl can follow -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 6.9 errors
On 30/06/12 07:10, spiky wrote: On 30/06/12 01:07, Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 6/29/2012 6:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:12:22PM +0100, spiky wrote: The host is there beta of next release, 32bit , kernel 3.2.0-26-generic-pae I installed the 3.5rc4 in previous chapter 6.7 I was in 2 minds weather to carry on, or rebuild an earlier kernel ( if thats a possible fault) Or rebuild with Debain host using 3.5rc4 kernel I think you should carry on. A few people seem to get perfect results in the toolchain tests for years on end, the rest of us often get a few minor failures from time to time. This error almost certainly does not matter. I've been thinking about suggesting that we change the language in the book re toolchain tests, but haven't got a round tuit. It was valid and useful when we started running the tests, but I think it is a little too 'black and white' for the variety of results we've seen over the years - and anyway, the tests can only attempt to check known failure cases and may themselves be buggy. *snip* ĸen While I myself have simply been able to skip all of the test suites and still forge on, checking the book's language for any updates needed would be a good idea. I have always failed the check test with glibc, and it's more of a waste of my time to rebuild and rerun than it is to simply build, install and configure the little bugger. Now if the kernel would simply cooperate with me and build properly, I'd be much happier with said kernel. Elly PS - don't try to help with my kernel issues. It simply hates building on some VMs, while at other times I can't get it configured to my tastes properly. Thks for advice I,m going to continue with build, If this was to cause any problems later When would I expect to see any? I,m am also going to build using debain live cd to see if different results appear. FYIO I have built using Debain live cd kernel 2.6.32, Everything else the same, I still end up with the same results as above. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.1 gcc build failure
On 01/07/12 09:32, Archie Arevalo wrote: Hello, my first time on the list and my first time to attempt LFS, I've looked around but I'm not sure what I am looking for. I have followed the instructions precisely and got binutils installed. Excerpt from http://pastebin.com/dGg0gaGi make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' Checking multilib configuration for libgcc... mkdir -p -- i686-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc Configuring in i686-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc configure: creating cache ./config.cache checking for --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs... no checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking for gawk... gawk checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-lfs-linux-gnu checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-ar... i686-lfs-linux-gnu-ar checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-lipo... i686-lfs-linux-gnu-lipo checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-nm... /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/nm checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib... i686-lfs-linux-gnu-ranlib checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-strip... i686-lfs-linux-gnu-strip checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc... /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc - B/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ - B/tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/include - isystem /tools/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/sys-include checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc- build/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/libgcc': configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See `config.log' for more details. make[1]: *** [configure-target-libgcc] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build$ The last part of the config.log is (complete logfile is at http://pastebin.com/CtC4sJ57 : ## --- ## ## confdefs.h. ## ## --- ## /* confdefs.h */ #define PACKAGE_NAME #define PACKAGE_TARNAME #define PACKAGE_VERSION #define PACKAGE_STRING #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT #define PACKAGE_URL #define LT_OBJDIR .libs/ configure: exit 0 Regards, Archie Arevalo Can you post the output of version-check, And if you have built gcc before did you remove the gcc dir and gcc-build dir then start with a fresh untar gcc dir. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 6.9 errors
On 30/06/12 01:07, Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 6/29/2012 6:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:12:22PM +0100, spiky wrote: The host is there beta of next release, 32bit , kernel 3.2.0-26-generic-pae I installed the 3.5rc4 in previous chapter 6.7 I was in 2 minds weather to carry on, or rebuild an earlier kernel ( if thats a possible fault) Or rebuild with Debain host using 3.5rc4 kernel I think you should carry on. A few people seem to get perfect results in the toolchain tests for years on end, the rest of us often get a few minor failures from time to time. This error almost certainly does not matter. I've been thinking about suggesting that we change the language in the book re toolchain tests, but haven't got a round tuit. It was valid and useful when we started running the tests, but I think it is a little too 'black and white' for the variety of results we've seen over the years - and anyway, the tests can only attempt to check known failure cases and may themselves be buggy. *snip* ĸen While I myself have simply been able to skip all of the test suites and still forge on, checking the book's language for any updates needed would be a good idea. I have always failed the check test with glibc, and it's more of a waste of my time to rebuild and rerun than it is to simply build, install and configure the little bugger. Now if the kernel would simply cooperate with me and build properly, I'd be much happier with said kernel. Elly PS - don't try to help with my kernel issues. It simply hates building on some VMs, while at other times I can't get it configured to my tastes properly. Thks for advice I,m going to continue with build, If this was to cause any problems later When would I expect to see any? I,m am also going to build using debain live cd to see if different results appear. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] Chapter 6.9 errors
Building svn 20120623 glibc-2.15 chapter 6.9 I have used the latest kernel 3.5rc4 ( could this cause the problem) Host Ubuntu 12.10 compliant The Whole build so far has been error free. This is the error at the end of TIMEOUTFACTOR=16 make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.15' make: *** [check] Error 2 root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/localedata/tst-xlocale1.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [localedata/tests] Error 2 make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/check-localplt.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2 make: *** [check] Error 2 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 6.9 errors
On 29/06/12 23:03, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:42:12PM +0100, spiky wrote:
Building svn 20120623 glibc-2.15 chapter 6.9
I have used the latest kernel 3.5rc4 ( could this cause the problem)
Possibly.
Host Ubuntu 12.10 compliant
That's a -rc or 'prerelease' of their next release ? It's possible
that something within the ubuntu kernel is causing this (or, are you
running your own 3.5-rc4 kernel on ubuntu ?)
The Whole build so far has been error free.
This is the error at the end of TIMEOUTFACTOR=16 make -k check 21 |
tee glibc-check-log
[...]
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/localedata/tst-xlocale1.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [localedata/tests] Error 2
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/check-localplt.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2
First comment: it's only one failure, I doubt if it matters -
probably a corner case.
Second comment: I noted this failure when I was building cross-lfs
on ppc and ppc64 - specifically in my notes between November 07 and
summer 08. Possibly I gave up clfs ppc{,64} after that, or else the
failure disappeared in a newer build. So, I very much doubt that it
matters (the completed systems worked fine), but it's interesting
that it has shown up now. Just as a data point, is this 32bit or
64-bit ?
ĸen
The host is there beta of next release, 32bit , kernel 3.2.0-26-generic-pae
I installed the 3.5rc4 in previous chapter 6.7
I was in 2 minds weather to carry on, or rebuild an earlier kernel ( if
thats a possible fault) Or rebuild with Debain host using 3.5rc4 kernel
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Populating /etc/rc.d
On 16/06/12 15:44, joao.more...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, A quick question : I've reached chapter 7, and I didn't realize when the /etc/rc.d directories were populated... I went back to reading chapter 6 but I couldn't find it. I thought probably sysvinit-2.88dsf, but I just unpacked that again, and it seems to just build binaries. Can someone please tell me at which step in the book is /etc/rc.d built and populated ? with which package ? Joao When you build the boot scripts chapter 7.6.1 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Not getting any output in dummy.c after GCC pass2 installation...please help...urgent
On 23/03/12 08:26, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Sumeet Shekhar sshekhar.s...@gmail.com mailto:sshekhar.s...@gmail.com wrote: I am not getting any output while running the program dummy.c after GCC pass2 installation. Also it says that create gcc-build directory again. Should i remove the previous gcc-build and build it again or create another build directory with some other name. What should i do..? Please help...urgent.. Thanking you, Regards -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Did you run the recommended checks as shown in the Caution section here, http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass2.html? Yes delete the gcc-build directory and the gcc directory then untar again -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] compilation error in GCC pass 1 package
On 29/01/12 09:14, mohit jain wrote: Sir I have attached the text file of the problem faced. Please find it and provide a remedy. I am using LFS-BOOK-6.7.pdf With UBUNTU 10.04 LTS as the host Facing problem in compiling GCC-4.5.1 - Pass 1 package and the error faced is attached as a text file which is copied from the terminal Regards, Mohit Jain Did you install gmp-5.0.2 as mentioned in the begining of the chapter. And did you check the host system requirements in the preface chapter -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] glibc tests errors
On 02/01/12 21:48, mais lfs wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com mailto:zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com mailto:zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote: Take a look in glibc-check-log from the *host* system. Don't have 'less' available yet, so is using: grep -B5 Error glibc-check-log I know you don't have less or vim in chroot, that's why I said to use it from the host. But, you've found the error. with which I found: .. error while loading shared libraries: libgcc_s.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory .. but: find / -name 'libgcc_s*' gives /sources/glibc-2.14.1/sysdeps/generic/libgcc_s.h /tools/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 /tools/lib/libgcc_s.so To confirm the problem, your really DO have to go back to the host system, then run ldd /mnt/lfs/tools/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 I'm guessing it's linked against one or more host libraries in /usr/lib. If so, something went badly wrong. I'm not in favour of the 'repeat, hoping it will work this time', approach. I do think you will have to start again, from the beginning, but if you can gather information about what you did wrong, you will know what to do differently next time. The problem with (only) libgcc_s doesn't ring any bells for me. I wonder if in fact other packages in chapter 5 have been linked to the host. You can try running ldd on some binaries in /tools/bin and some shared libraries in /tools/lib - pick one of either from each package, starting with binutils pass 2 (section 5.9) and then for random later packages. If they are all linked to /usr/lib, something went wrong in section 5.8, 'Adjusting the Toolchain'. If the problem is only with some, or all, packages after binutils pass 2, then I suspect you took a break, but didn't correctly restore the environment when you resumed. Thx Ken I suspect your suspect is correct. I've been sitting doing this in one go when I should have taken regular breaks. What I'm going to do now is print out 10 or so pages at a time, do what's on them tick the steps off as I do them, and then take a break before I do the next set of pages. I'm going to keep the broken attempt - got more than enough diskspace to create more partitions - so I can later (maybe) as an exercise try and find my mistake when I understand the whole a bit better. Doing the building two or three times can only help me understand things better. Anyway I wonder if anybody ever did the build right the first time, in only a single go? Did you do the host system requirments in chapter preface http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.0/prologue/hostreqs.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5 gcc 2nd build
On 02/01/12 22:57, James Forcier wrote: I am working on the 2nd build of gcc in Chapter 5, LFS 7.0. It says that the patch gcc-4.6.1-startfiles_fix-1 should be applied; should the patch applied to the first build of gcc (gcc-4.6.1-cross_compile-1) also be applied? No just the patch it asks for patch gcc-4.6.1-startfiles_fix-1 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] metacity error
On 29/12/11 17:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote: spiky wrote: Hi I,m building Metacity-2.30.1 I recieved an error while running make. libmetacity_private_la-boxes.lo] Error 1 leaving metacity-2.30.1/src. I checked the src there is no libmetacity_private_la-boxes I have not had a chance to try Metacity yet because it requires several Gnome packages that have not yet been updated. It was last checked for LFS 6.5. The current version is 2.34.1. If you get it working, let us know of any workarounds you needed to do. -- Bruce I did have to change to libcanberra-028 as the 0.18 failed to build, The 0.28 version built without problems, Regarding Metacity I was just seeing what is was like as I had tried Fluxbox and sawfish, I did get success with Metacity-2.34.1 building without problem Just couldn't configure it to work with X, I then swapped to xfce-4.8 which went without a hitch. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Pygtk-2.17.0 error with Pygobject-3.0.3
On 28/12/11 10:30, Simon Geard wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 10:48 +, spiky wrote: I would like to know if there is a problem with Pygtk-2.17.0 and Pygobject-3.0.3? I had an install error I reverted back to Pygobject-2.21.3 with success Yes. The newer Pygobject 3 series isn't compatible with previous versions, or with other packages like Pygtk that depends on them. It's effectively a completely new library, and I think both it and 2.x can be installed without conflicting with each other. Simon. Yes I have installed the older 2x version with 3x all seems ok at the moment Martyn -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Pygtk-2.17.0 error with Pygobject-3.0.3
I would like to know if there is a problem with Pygtk-2.17.0 and Pygobject-3.0.3? I had an install error I reverted back to Pygobject-2.21.3 with success -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ld:Cannot find -lgcc_eh when compiling Glibc
On 08/12/11 12:31, 王斌 wrote: Hello, everybody. I have figured out this problem. I forgot to link libgcc.a to lgcc_eh after I installed gcc. In anoter word, type the command: ln -vs libgcc.a `$LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name | \ sed 's/libgcc/_eh/'` 在 2011年12月8日 下午7:46，王斌 wbi...@gmail.com mailto:wbi...@gmail.com写 道： Sorry, I think there are more messages about errors: i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -o /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/iconvconfig -Wl,-dynamic-linker=/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--hash-style=both /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/crt1.o /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/crti.o `i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc --print-file-name=crtbegin.o` /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/iconvconfig.o /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/strtab.o /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/xmalloc.o /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/hash-string.o -Wl,-rpath-link=/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/math:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/elf:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/dlfcn:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/nss:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/nis:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/rt:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/resolv:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/crypt:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/nptl /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/libc.so.6 /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/libc_nonshared.a /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/elf/ld.so -lgcc -lgcc_eh `i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc --print-file-name=crtend.o` /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/crtn.o /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/iconvconfig] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.14.1/iconv' make[1]: *** [iconv/others] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.14.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 -- Forwarded message -- From: *王斌* wbi...@gmail.com mailto:wbi...@gmail.com Date: 2011/12/8 Subject: ld:Cannot find -lgcc_eh when compiling Glibc To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org mailto:lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Hello, everybody. I have an error when I compiling glibc in Chapter 5. My host system is 32-bit ubuntu 11.10. There is an error about mawk at first, so I changed mask to gask. But there is still an error: /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/libc.so.6 /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/libc_nonshared.a /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/elf/ld.so -lgcc -lgcc_eh `i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc --print-file-name=crtend.o` /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/crtn.o /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/iconv/iconvconfig] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.14.1/iconv' make[1]: *** [iconv/others] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.14.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 Thanks! Did you make sure Ubuntu was compliant using the version script -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] libc.so.6
On 20/11/11 14:02, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:32:57 +0800 Zhu Bicenzhubi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am check the host requirement to build LFS. after issuing the version-check.sh on error is occured: I am using a 32 bit ubuntu 11.10. version-check.sh: line 22: /lib/libc.so.6: No such file or directory I haven't downloaded or tried ubuntu 11.10 so I can't say for certain but I suspect you'll be fine. The file seems to be in a subdirectory (/lib/i383-linux-gnu/libc.so.6? I'm not sure). The rest of you output looks fine (/bin/sh and awk look good). I'd crack on if I were you. Andy Hi I have built on 11.04 had same error on version-check.sh: line 22: /lib/libc.so.6: No such file or directory To fix it Run this symlink sudo ln -s /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.so /lib/libc.so.6 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 01:26 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:53:11 +
spiky martynvid...@aol.com wrote:
I have built lfs7 with linux 3.1rc4. I cant boot it when on sdc. If
drive is put in laptop on IDE it will boot. I have set the fstab
grub.cfg in lots of different ways still no joy,
grub.cfg
# Begin /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set default=0
set timeout=5
insmod ext2
set root=(hd2,1)
menuentry GNU/Linux, Linux 3.1-lfs-7.0 {
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.1-lfs-7.0 root=/dev/sdc1
}
fstab
# Begin /etc/fstab
# file system mount-point type options dump fsck
#order
/dev/sdc1 /ext4 defaults1 1
/dev/sdc2 swap swap pri=1 0 0
proc /procproc defaults0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=4,mode=620 0 0
tmpfs /run tmpfs defaults0 0
# End /etc/fstab
I would like it to boot off it,s own drive selected by bios (bios dose
allow booting from usb)
At what point in the boot process does the boot fail (BIOS, grub or
kernel)? What sort of error messages do you get when the boot fails?
Give us a clue, what actually happens?
FWIW fstab is irrelevent for a boot failing. The kernel gets its root
partition from the grub command line in grub.cfg and mounts that read
only. /etc/fstab comes into play later when the bootscripts do their
work.
Andy
Ok I used grub prompt it showed the usb drive
hd0,msdos1(LFS-7.0),2(swap),3(home).
then entered set root=(hd0,msdos)
linux /boot/vmlinux-3.1-7.0 (it found with tab)root=/devsda1
boot
i get
no filesystem could mount root tried ext 3 ,2, 4 etc
also Kernel panic not syncing VFS unable to mount root fson unknown
block (8.1).
This is the same as I get when I let it boot as normal for this drive.
Martyn
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On 13/11/11 11:50, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:36:34 + spikymartynvid...@aol.com wrote: Ok I used grub prompt it showed the usb drive hd0,msdos1(LFS-7.0),2(swap),3(home). then entered set root=(hd0,msdos) linux /boot/vmlinux-3.1-7.0 (it found with tab)root=/devsda1 boot i get no filesystem could mount root tried ext 3 ,2, 4 etc also Kernel panic not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs on unknown block (8.1). This is the same as I get when I let it boot as normal for this drive. That looks like a kernel panic, which is good because it means you've got past the BIOS and grub. It could be that you've not compiled the kernel with support for the root filesystem built into the kernel. It could also be that the kernel config is fine but you've passed it the wrong root= option on the grub command line. I'm pretty sure I'd get a similar looking kernel panic if I tried to boot my kernel with root= pointing to my swap partition. Another possibility is that the kernel sees the partition as /dev/sdb1 or /dev/hdc1 or some such. There's no way to be sure other than to try all the combinations you can think of and see what works. If none of them work then the problem is probably with your kernel config so you'll have to work on that recompile your kernel until you get one that boots. Andy Even tho the system will boot when an ide, I did recompile kernel yesterday checking sata stuff and usb. It just seems confusing as I know it will boot until connected as usb. I will try kernel again checking for root file system support. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On 13/11/11 12:36, Alain Toussaint wrote: hd0,msdos1(LFS-7.0),2(swap),3(home). ^^ Could it be that the partition is FAT32 instead of ext(2,3,4)? Alain I formatted the partition with gparted to ext4 swap is swap home ext4 Martyn -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On 13/11/11 12:38, spiky wrote: On 13/11/11 12:36, Alain Toussaint wrote: hd0,msdos1(LFS-7.0),2(swap),3(home). ^^ Could it be that the partition is FAT32 instead of ext(2,3,4)? Alain I formatted the partition with gparted to ext4 swap is swap home ext4 Martyn Ok I have run kernel config again I enabled all filesystems ext2,3,4 in the file section hope this was the right place for root filesystem. I ran grub prompt on my ubuntu system (IDE) (set root hd0,2) then (root =/dev/sda2) that boots. I tried ubuntu 11.10 which is on sdb (usb) Couldn,t get it to boot? from grub prompt but will if select that harddrive from bios. I redone LFS grub.cfg root=hdo,2 then linux root=UUID=uuid no still no joy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On 13/11/11 17:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:36:34 + spikymartynvid...@aol.com wrote: Ok I used grub prompt it showed the usb drive hd0,msdos1(LFS-7.0),2(swap),3(home). then entered set root=(hd0,msdos) That seems right. The msdos part is the boot record type, not a partition type, linux /boot/vmlinux-3.1-7.0 (it found with tab)root=/devsda1 Is there a missing / or just a typo? Should be /dev/sda1 boot i get no filesystem could mount root tried ext 3 ,2, 4 etc also Kernel panic not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs on unknown block (8.1). When you have a problem with a lot of new things, isolate the new from the old. I recommend going back to a ext3 partition until you get it working. This is the same as I get when I let it boot as normal for this drive. That looks like a kernel panic, which is good because it means you've got past the BIOS and grub. Right. It could also be that the kernel config is fine but you've passed it the wrong root= option on the grub command line. That would be my thought too. I'm pretty sure I'd get a similar looking kernel panic if I tried to boot my kernel with root= pointing to my swap partition. Another possibility is that the kernel sees the partition as /dev/sdb1 or /dev/hdc1 or some such. There's no way to be sure other than to try all the combinations you can think of and see what works. If none of them work then the problem is probably with your kernel config so you'll have to work on that recompile your kernel until you get one that boots. BTW, the kernel doesn't understand root=UUID=uuid. You have to have a initrd for that. I'm not sure if the kernel understands root=LABEL=label or not. Just remember that grub's root and the kernel's root are not, in general, the same thing, although they could point to the same place. -- Bruce If I was to go back to ext3 would that mean a complete rebuild or is it possible to use gparted? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On 13/11/11 17:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:36:34 +
spikymartynvid...@aol.com wrote:
Ok I used grub prompt it showed the usb drive
hd0,msdos1(LFS-7.0),2(swap),3(home).
then entered set root=(hd0,msdos)
That seems right. The msdos part is the boot record type, not a
partition type,
linux /boot/vmlinux-3.1-7.0 (it found with tab)root=/devsda1
Is there a missing / or just a typo? Should be /dev/sda1
boot
i get
no filesystem could mount root tried ext 3 ,2, 4 etc
also Kernel panic not syncing VFS unable to mount root fs on unknown
block (8.1).
When you have a problem with a lot of new things, isolate the new from
the old. I recommend going back to a ext3 partition until you get it
working.
This is the same as I get when I let it boot as normal for this drive.
That looks like a kernel panic, which is good because it means you've
got past the BIOS and grub.
Right.
It
could also be that the kernel config is fine but you've passed it the
wrong root= option on the grub command line.
That would be my thought too.
I'm pretty sure I'd get a
similar looking kernel panic if I tried to boot my kernel with root=
pointing to my swap partition. Another possibility is that the kernel
sees the partition as /dev/sdb1 or /dev/hdc1 or some such. There's no
way to be sure other than to try all the combinations you can think of
and see what works. If none of them work then the problem is probably
with your kernel config so you'll have to work on that recompile your
kernel until you get one that boots.
BTW, the kernel doesn't understand root=UUID=uuid. You have to have a
initrd for that. I'm not sure if the kernel understands
root=LABEL=label or not.
Just remember that grub's root and the kernel's root are not, in
general, the same thing, although they could point to the same place.
-- Bruce
Ok just found a fix fstab
# Begin /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set default=0
set timeout=5
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,1)
menuentry GNU/Linux, Linux 3.1-lfs-7.0 {
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.1-lfs-7.0 root=/dev/sdc1 *rootdelay=30 ro*
}
any thoughts I will play with fstab, The idea is waiting for the usb to
load (google search)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
I have built lfs7 with linux 3.1rc4. I cant boot it when on sdc. If
drive is put in laptop on IDE it will boot. I have set the fstab
grub.cfg in lots of different ways still no joy,
grub.cfg
# Begin /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set default=0
set timeout=5
insmod ext2
set root=(hd2,1)
menuentry GNU/Linux, Linux 3.1-lfs-7.0 {
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.1-lfs-7.0 root=/dev/sdc1
}
fstab
# Begin /etc/fstab
# file system mount-point type options dump fsck
#order
/dev/sdc1 /ext4 defaults1 1
/dev/sdc2 swap swap pri=1 0 0
proc /procproc defaults0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=4,mode=620 0 0
tmpfs /run tmpfs defaults0 0
# End /etc/fstab
I would like it to boot off it,s own drive selected by bios (bios dose
allow booting from usb)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: built LFS7 wont boot from usb harddrive
On 12/11/11 23:17, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
spiky wrote:
I have built lfs7 with linux 3.1rc4. I cant boot it when on sdc. If
drive is put in laptop on IDE it will boot. I have set the fstab
grub.cfg in lots of different ways still no joy,
grub.cfg
# Begin /boot/grub/grub.cfg
set default=0
set timeout=5
insmod ext2
set root=(hd2,1)
menuentry GNU/Linux, Linux 3.1-lfs-7.0 {
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.1-lfs-7.0 root=/dev/sdc1
}
fstab
# Begin /etc/fstab
# file system mount-point type options dump fsck
#order
/dev/sdc1 /ext4 defaults1 1
/dev/sdc2 swap swap pri=1 0 0
proc /procproc defaults0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=4,mode=620 0 0
tmpfs /run tmpfs defaults0 0
# End /etc/fstab
I would like it to boot off it,s own drive selected by bios (bios dose
allow booting from usb)
I've never tried that, but does grub recognize the usb drive at all?
You may need 'insmod usb.mod'. The first step is to go to the grub
command line and get it to recognize the usb drive. Then get it to boot
from the command line. Only after you can do that, try to get grub.cfg
right.
I suspect that from grub's perspective, after the bios hands off to the
usb drive, that root is hd0.
You might want to try the help-grub mailing list:
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-grub
-- Bruce
I have tried setting root to hd0,1 and setting boot to sda1 just incase
it looked at it as the 1st boot option, I,m not sure it is a grub fault
as when I ran grub update from Ubuntu it still wont boot.
When you say get the command line to recognise the usb it appears in
bklid and device map shows hd0 hd1 hd2
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Ok, now I am having issues
On 07/11/11 20:27, Yaser Amini wrote:
Try to execute command separately
First:
CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib/ \
AR=$LFS_TGT-ar RANLIB=$LFS_TGT-ranlib
Second:
../binutils-2.21.1/configure --prefix=/tools \
--disable-nls --with-lib-path=/tools/lib
It worked for me
*From:*lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] *On Behalf Of *Danny
Vukobratovich
*Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2011 5:54 PM
*To:* LFS Support List
*Subject:* Ok, now I am having issues
I am using LFS 7.0
I am working on section 5.9 Binutils-2.21.1a Pass 2
I type in the first command sequence:
CC=$LFS_TGT-gcc -B/tools/lib/ \
AR=$LFS_TGT-ar RANLIB=$LFS_TGT-ranlib \
../binutils-2.21.1/configure --prefix=/tools \
--disable-nls --with-lib-path=/tools/lib
it errors out stating:
configure: error: C compiler can not create executables
I check the config.log file
Here is an exert from where the error occurs:
FATAL: kernel too old
onfigure:4180: $? = 1
configure:4217: result:
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION
| #define PACKAGE_STRING
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT
| #define PACKAGE_URL
|
| int
| main ()
| {
|;
| return 0:
| }
configure:4223: error: in '/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build':
configure:4227: error: C compiler cannot create executabables
then at the end of the file, I get:
configure: exit 77
this is a fresh installation and I have had no problems up until this
point. Thank you very much,
Danny Vukobratovich
Systems Administrator
Marian, Inc.
www.marianinc.com http://www.marianinc.com
Did you check the host system is compliant maybe post the output of
version script
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Gcc errors
Hi I have been building lfs 7rc2, Host Ubuntu 11.04 complient. I have built up to 6.17 gcc. I restarted machine today so as to carry on the build of gcc, After completing chapters 2.4, check echo $LFS correct output, chapter 6.2.2 and finally 6.4 chroot, all commands up to 6.4 were copy/paste. I have rebooted the machine a few times and had no problems or errors with the build. The only change to the book I have made is linux3.1rc4. I dont think this will cause any problems at the moment. The error I get is with make of gcc is missing dir/files I have checked /tools/bin/msgfmt and the other dir which are missing they are there. I have rm -r gcc-build gcc-4.6.1 a couple of times and redone them again Thks in advance libtool: link: ranlib .libs/libstdc++.a libtool: link: rm -fr .libs/libstdc++.lax libtool: link: ( cd .libs rm -f libstdc++.la ln -s ../libstdc++.la libstdc++.la ) make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src' Making all in po make[4]: Entering directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/po' msgfmt -o de.mo ../../../../gcc-4.6.1/libstdc++-v3/po/de.po /tools/bin/msgfmt: line 61: /bin/sed: No such file or directory /tools/bin/msgfmt: line 65: /bin/sed: No such file or directory /tools/bin/msgfmt: line 118: cd: /mnt/lfs/sources/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools/src: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-msgfmt.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-write-mo.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-write-java.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-write-csharp.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-write-resources.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-write-tcl.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-write-qt.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: msgfmt-hash-string.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: ./.libs/libgettextsrc.so: No such file or directory gcc: error: /mnt/lfs/sources/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib/.libs/libgettextlib.so: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [de.mo] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/po' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3' make[1]: *** [all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 root:/sources/gcc-build# -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Gcc errors
On 28/10/11 19:46, spiky wrote: Hi I have been building lfs 7rc2, Host Ubuntu 11.04 complient. I have built up to 6.17 gcc. I restarted machine today so as to carry on the build of gcc, After completing chapters 2.4, check echo $LFS correct output, chapter 6.2.2 and finally 6.4 chroot, all commands up to 6.4 were copy/paste. I have rebooted the machine a few times and had no problems or errors with the build. The only change to the book I have made is linux3.1rc4. I dont think this will cause any problems at the moment. The error I get is with make of gcc is missing dir/files I have checked /tools/bin/msgfmt and the other dir which are missing they are there. I have rm -r gcc-build gcc-4.6.1 a couple of times and redone them again Thks in advance Ok I have found the problem, It,s in the gettext install 5.23.1, I put cd gettext-0.18.1.1, should of been *_cd gettext-tools_*. Is this fixable? I have a backup BUT I think it was done after stripping 5.34 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: lfs 7 rc2
On 17/10/11 23:02, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
spiky wrote:
On 17/10/11 22:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
spiky wrote:
I,m using Ubuntu 11.04 I ran the version script and fixed all
dependencies.
I having a problem with
Version 7.0-rc2 glibc-2.14.1 and the patches. I have used both patches
as per book, Just 1 Question the patches do go in untarred dir
glibc-2.14.1?
checking cpuid.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled
configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
checking for cpuid.h... no
configure: error: gcc must provide thecpuid.h header
It sounds like you don't have a full gcc installation. autoconf is
checked for, but not required.
cpuid.h should be in
/mnt/lfs/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.1/include/cpuid.h
It doesn't have any include files, but it does have some assembler code.
-- Bruce
Yes thats where the file is
Oh yes. Did you apply glibc-2.14.1-cpuid-1.patch? Check
sysdeps/i386/configure around line 632 to make sure. It's a 3 line patch.
-- Bruce
I rebuilt glibc-2.14.1 again,
the section regarding
ac_fn_c_check_header_mongrel $LINENO cpuid.h ac_cv_header_cpuid_h
$ac_includes_default
if test x$ac_cv_header_cpuid_h = xyes; then :
else
as_fn_error $? gcc must provide the cpuid.h header $LINENO 5
fi
# as_fn_set_status STATUS
# ---
# Set $? to STATUS, without forking.
as_fn_set_status ()
{
return $1
} # as_fn_set_status
# as_fn_exit STATUS
# -
# Exit the shell with STATUS, even in a trap 0 or set -e context.
as_fn_exit ()
{
set +e
as_fn_set_status $1
exit $1
} # as_fn_exit
# as_fn_arith ARG...
# --
# Perform arithmetic evaluation on the ARGs, and store the result in the
# global $as_val. Take advantage of shells that can avoid forks. The arguments
# must be portable across $(()) and expr.
if (eval test \$(( 1 + 1 )) = 2) 2/dev/null; then :
eval 'as_fn_arith ()
{
as_val=$(( $* ))
}'
else
as_fn_arith ()
{
as_val=`expr $@ || test $? -eq 1`
}
fi # as_fn_arith
if expr a : '\(a\)' /dev/null 21
test X`expr 1 : '.*\(...\)'` = X001; then
as_expr=expr
else
as_expr=false
fi
if (basename -- /) /dev/null 21 test X`basename -- / 21` = X/; then
as_basename=basename
else
as_basename=false
fi
as_me=`$as_basename -- $0 ||
$as_expr X/$0 : '.*/\([^/][^/]*\)/*$' \| \
X$0 : 'X\(//\)$' \| \
X$0 : 'X\(/\)' \| . 2/dev/null ||
$as_echo X/$0 |
sed '/^.*\/\([^/][^/]*\)\/*$/{
s//\1/
q
}
/^X\/\(\/\/\)$/{
s//\1/
q
}
/^X\/\(\/\).*/{
s//\1/
q
}
s/.*/./; q'`
as_lineno_1=$LINENO as_lineno_1a=$LINENO
as_lineno_2=$LINENO as_lineno_2a=$LINENO
eval 'test x$as_lineno_1'$as_run' != x$as_lineno_2'$as_run'
test x`expr $as_lineno_1'$as_run' + 1` = x$as_lineno_2'$as_run'' || {
# Blame Lee E. McMahon (1931-1989) for sed's syntax. :-)
sed -n '
p
/[$]LINENO/=
' $as_myself |
sed '
s/[$]LINENO.*/-/
t lineno
b
:lineno
N
:loop
s/[$]LINENO\([^'$as_cr_alnum'_].*\n\)\(.*\)/\2\1\2/
t loop
s/-\n.*//
' $as_me.lineno
chmod +x $as_me.lineno ||
{ $as_echo $as_me: error: cannot create $as_me.lineno; rerun with a POSIX
shell 2; as_fn_exit 1; }
# Don't try to exec as it changes $[0], causing all sort of problems
# (the dirname of $[0] is not the place where we might find the
# original and so on. Autoconf is especially sensitive to this).
. ./$as_me.lineno
# Exit status is that of the last command.
exit
}
# Factoring default headers for most tests.
ac_includes_default=\
#include stdio.h
#ifdef HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H
# include sys/types.h
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_SYS_STAT_H
# include sys/stat.h
#endif
#ifdef STDC_HEADERS
# include stdlib.h
# include stddef.h
#else
# ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H
# include stdlib.h
# endif
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
# if !defined STDC_HEADERS defined HAVE_MEMORY_H
# include memory.h
# endif
# include string.h
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
# include strings.h
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_INTTYPES_H
# include inttypes.h
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H
# include stdint.h
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
# include unistd.h
#endif
# ac_fn_c_try_compile LINENO
# --
# Try to compile conftest.$ac_ext, and return whether this succeeded.
ac_fn_c_try_compile ()
{
as_lineno=${as_lineno-$1} as_lineno_stack=as_lineno_stack=$as_lineno_stack
rm -f conftest.$ac_objext
if { { ac_try=$ac_compile
case (($ac_try in
*\* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;
*) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;
esac
eval ac_try_echo=\\$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: $ac_try_echo\
$as_echo $ac_try_echo; } 5
(eval $ac_compile
lfs 7 rc2
I,m using Ubuntu 11.04 I ran the version script and fixed all dependencies. I having a problem with Version 7.0-rc2 glibc-2.14.1 and the patches. I have used both patches as per book, Just 1 Question the patches do go in untarred dir glibc-2.14.1? checking cpuid.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for cpuid.h... no configure: error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header checking for autoconf... no configure: WARNING: *** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions: autoconf *** some features will be disabled. *** Check the INSTALL file for required versions. checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... ok checking whether GCC supports -static-libgcc... -static-libgcc checking for bash... /bin/bash checking for gawk... gawk checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for install-info... /usr/bin/install-info checking for bison... /usr/bin/bison checking for signed size_t type... no checking for libc-friendly stddef.h... yes checking whether we need to use -P to assemble .S files... no checking for .set assembler directive... yes checking for assembler gnu_unique_object symbol type... yes checking for .symver assembler directive... yes checking for ld --version-script... yes checking for .previous assembler directive... yes checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... yes checking for broken __attribute__((visibility()))... no checking for broken __attribute__((alias()))... no checking whether to put _rtld_local into .sdata section... no checking for .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support... yes checking for libunwind-support in compiler... no checking for -z nodelete option... yes checking for -z nodlopen option... yes checking for -z initfirst option... yes checking for -z relro option... yes checking for -Bgroup option... yes checking for libgcc_s suffix... checking for --as-needed option... no checking whether --noexecstack is desirable for .S files... yes checking for -z combreloc... yes checking for -z execstack... yes checking for -fpie... no checking for --hash-style option... yes checking for -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-section-anchors... yes checking for -fstack-protector... no checking for -fgnu89-inline... yes checking whether cc puts quotes around section names... no checking for assembler .weak directive... yes checking whether CFI directives are supported... yes checking for ld --no-whole-archive... yes checking for gcc -fexceptions... yes checking for __builtin_expect... yes checking for __builtin_memset... yes checking for redirection of built-in functions... yes checking for __thread... yes checking for tls_model attribute... yes checking for libgd... no checking for is_selinux_enabled in -lselinux... no checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... no checking for sys/types.h... no checking for sys/stat.h... no checking for stdlib.h... no checking for string.h... no checking for memory.h... no checking for strings.h... no checking for inttypes.h... no checking for stdint.h... no checking for unistd.h... no checking size of long double... 0 running configure fragment for sysdeps/i386/elf checking for i386 TLS support... yes running configure fragment for nptl/sysdeps/pthread checking for forced unwind support... (cached) yes checking for C cleanup handling... (cached) yes running configure fragment for sysdeps/pthread running configure fragment for sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /bin/grep checking for egrep... (cached) /bin/grep -E checking installed Linux kernel header files... 2.0.10 or later checking for kernel header at least 2.6.25... ok running configure fragment for sysdeps/i386 checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /bin/grep checking for egrep... (cached) /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) no checking for sys/types.h... (cached) no checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) no checking for stdlib.h... (cached) no checking for string.h... (cached) no checking for memory.h... (cached) no checking for strings.h... (cached) no checking for inttypes.h... (cached) no checking for stdint.h... (cached) no checking for unistd.h... (cached) no checking cpuid.h usability... no checking cpuid.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: cpuid.h:
Re: lfs 7 rc2
On 17/10/11 22:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote: spiky wrote: I,m using Ubuntu 11.04 I ran the version script and fixed all dependencies. I having a problem with Version 7.0-rc2 glibc-2.14.1 and the patches. I have used both patches as per book, Just 1 Question the patches do go in untarred dir glibc-2.14.1? checking cpuid.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: section Present But Cannot Be Compiled configure: WARNING: cpuid.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for cpuid.h... no configure: error: gcc must provide thecpuid.h header It sounds like you don't have a full gcc installation. autoconf is checked for, but not required. cpuid.h should be in /mnt/lfs/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.1/include/cpuid.h It doesn't have any include files, but it does have some assembler code. -- Bruce Yes thats where the file is -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
