Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:34:22PM +0800, dev o wrote: > Good evening, > > With no more suggestions coming forward, I suppose that all troubleshooting > options have already been exhausted on this issue. > In that case, I guess it is time to wipe the host and start fresh with a > newly installed distro right? > > In my first attempt, I broke an ubuntu host, and I received a suggestion to > try debian instead. Now I appear to have used LFS to break a debian host > as well so are there any suggestions on the next distro to try to maybe > have success in this LFS journey? > > Thank you, take care, > Allan I've had a quick look, again, at your earlier thread and I don't see any evidence that you have broken the host. I'm not saying that you have not, but wiping the host is not a common approach and everything in LFS is intended to keep the host system usable. The normal approach to a failed build is: 1. Look for evidence of what went wrong (that includes looking at your command history to see if you missed something). I agree that you seem to have come to the end of that. 2. The next approach is to unmount the partition where you are trying to build LFS, and start over. I see that you did check the host requirements last time, but it looks as if one of the following three things might have happened: (a) Doing the chapter 5 build, or part of it, as user root. If that was the case then yes, maybe you did destroy the host. (b) Not setting LFS at some point. (c) Missing some instructions (often caused by either not reading to the end of the page, or by 'turning over two pages'). Can also happen if people try to paste instructions from a PDF - don't do that, use the html. Good luck! ĸen -- He could send for Ptraci, his favourite handmaiden. She was special. Her singing always cheered him up. Life seemed so much brighter when she stopped. -- Pyramids -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
Bonjour Alan, On Thu, 2020-04-30 at 20:34 +0800, dev o wrote: > Good evening, > > With no more suggestions coming forward, I suppose that all > troubleshooting options have already been exhausted on this issue. > In that case, I guess it is time to wipe the host and start fresh > with a newly installed distro right? > > In > my first attempt, I broke an ubuntu host, and I received a > suggestion > to try debian instead. Now I appear to have used LFS to break a > debian > host as well so are there any suggestions on the next distro to try > to > maybe have success in this LFS journey? > > Thank you, take care, > Allan > > As you must/need to start with fresh host, may be you can use an LFS ISO to prepare an LFS HOST, then build your own on it. May I suggest to us https://okrepo.safe.ca/osukiss/9.1/isos/RESCUE-LFS-9.1-1.78.1-x86_64.iso It is a build on a rather new LFS (Mar 9) and can be used too as reference while you are building your one. My 2 cents. Keep me posted if you need help (on private channel). -- You have seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files www.osukiss.org -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 21:01 +0800, dev o wrote: > Good morning, > > Thank you for each of the responses, I'll respond to each in order: > > - > > Which version of LFS book are you using? And what is the output of > "version- > check.sh" in sect. 2.2.? > > Version: LFS-9.1 > > version_check.sh => > > bash, version 5.0.3(1)-release > /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash > Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1 > bison (GNU Bison) 3.3.2 > /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/bison.yacc > bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. > Coreutils: 8.30 > diff (GNU diffutils) 3.7 > find (GNU findutils) 4.6.0.225-235f > GNU Awk 4.2.1, API: 2.0 (GNU MPFR 4.0.2, GNU MP 6.1.2) > /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk > gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 > g++ (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 > (Debian GLIBC 2.28-10) 2.28 > grep (GNU grep) 3.3 > gzip 1.9 > Linux version 4.19.0-8-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc > version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6)) #1 SMP Debian 4.19.98-1 (2020-01-26) > m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.18 > GNU Make 4.2.1 > GNU patch 2.7.6 > Perl version='5.28.1'; > Python 3.7.3 > sed (GNU sed) 4.7 > tar (GNU tar) 1.30 > texi2any (GNU texinfo) 6.5 > xz (XZ Utils) 5.2.4 > g++ compilation OK > > - > > dump question, but are the virtual filesystems mounted as described > in > section 6.2 ? > > I have played close attention to the instructions about the mounting > and chroot and noticed that it is often identified as the culprit in > earlier conversations. The partition is mounted on boot via fstab > then I run the following commands as root: > mount -v --bind /dev $LFS/dev && mount -vt devpts devpts $LFS/dev/pts > -o gid=5,mode=620 && mount -vt proc proc $LFS/proc && mount -vt sysfs > sysfs $LFS/sys && mount -vt tmpfs tmpfs $LFS/run > > if [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ]; then mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink > $LFS/dev/shm); fi > > chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root > TERM="$TERM"PS1='(lfs chroot) \u:\w\$ ' > PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin/bash -- > login +h > > I don't know how to try and verify beyond that :/ > > - > > (I discarded /, /sys, /run, /proc & /boot) > TARGETSOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS > ├─/devudev devtmpf > rw,nosuid,relatime,size=401 > │ ├─/dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs > rw,nosuid,nodev > │ ├─/dev/hugepageshugetlbfs hugetlb > rw,relatime,pagesize=2M > │ ├─/dev/mqueue mqueue mqueue rw,relatime > │ └─/dev/pts devpts devpts > rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620, > │ └─/dev/ptsdevpts devpts Hmmm, this is dubious. /dev/pts mounted on /dev/pts... what does "ls /dev/pts" say (as root, from host) If it returns /dev/pts/dev, then try "umount /dev/pts/dev/pts" then rm -r /dev/pts/dev Or reboot, login as root, set LFS (important!), mount the virtual filesystems again. Try findmnt at this point, chroot again, and try again to su in gcc. > rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,g > ├─/mnt/lfs/dev/sdb10 ext4rw,relatime > │ ├─/mnt/lfs/dev udev devtmpf > rw,nosuid,relatime,size=401 > │ │ └─/mnt/lfs/dev/ptsdevpts devpts > rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620, > │ ├─/mnt/lfs/proc proc procrw,relatime > │ ├─/mnt/lfs/sys sysfs sysfs rw,relatime > │ └─/mnt/lfs/run tmpfs tmpfs rw,relatime > > The following are run from within the chroot environment: > ls -l $LFS/var/run > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr 11 13:47 /var/run -> /run > > ls -l $LFS/dev/shm > * nothing returned * This is as it should on debian: it does not tell you is does not exist. It is just a normal directory. Well, you could mount a tmpfs on it, but I do not think it has anything to do with the error you have > ls -l $LFS/dev > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root40 Apr 14 12:08 shm(it is > listed despite not returning for the command above) Hmm, is it the only line of output? > > based on your expected response, It appears to me that /dev/shm is > not mounted correctly. > > If believe that is supposed to be achieved by this command: > if [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ]; then mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink > $LFS/dev/shm); fi > > Each of these commands return nil if run in isolation: > [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ] ** i have no idea what is performed by this > syntax ** > readlink $LFS/dev/shm** maybe i missed a command to make this > link? i don't see it in the end of chapter 5 ** > > -- > > I also received a response on the linuxquestions thread: > https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=6110835#post6110835 > > The fellow mentioned that debian doesn't allow users to an su to > unpermissioned user without password. Once you are in chroot, the debian configuration files are not accessible
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
Good morning, Thank you for each of the responses, I'll respond to each in order: - Which version of LFS book are you using? And what is the output of "version- check.sh" in sect. 2.2.? Version: LFS-9.1 version_check.sh => bash, version 5.0.3(1)-release /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1 bison (GNU Bison) 3.3.2 /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/bison.yacc bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010. Coreutils: 8.30 diff (GNU diffutils) 3.7 find (GNU findutils) 4.6.0.225-235f GNU Awk 4.2.1, API: 2.0 (GNU MPFR 4.0.2, GNU MP 6.1.2) /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 g++ (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 (Debian GLIBC 2.28-10) 2.28 grep (GNU grep) 3.3 gzip 1.9 Linux version 4.19.0-8-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 8.3.0 (Debian 8.3.0-6)) #1 SMP Debian 4.19.98-1 (2020-01-26) m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.18 GNU Make 4.2.1 GNU patch 2.7.6 Perl version='5.28.1'; Python 3.7.3 sed (GNU sed) 4.7 tar (GNU tar) 1.30 texi2any (GNU texinfo) 6.5 xz (XZ Utils) 5.2.4 g++ compilation OK - dump question, but are the virtual filesystems mounted as described in section 6.2 ? I have played close attention to the instructions about the mounting and chroot and noticed that it is often identified as the culprit in earlier conversations. The partition is mounted on boot via fstab then I run the following commands as root: mount -v --bind /dev $LFS/dev && mount -vt devpts devpts $LFS/dev/pts -o gid=5,mode=620 && mount -vt proc proc $LFS/proc && mount -vt sysfs sysfs $LFS/sys && mount -vt tmpfs tmpfs $LFS/run if [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ]; then mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink $LFS/dev/shm); fi chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM="$TERM"PS1='(lfs chroot) \u:\w\$ ' PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin/bash --login +h I don't know how to try and verify beyond that :/ - (I discarded /, /sys, /run, /proc & /boot) TARGETSOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS ├─/devudev devtmpf rw,nosuid,relatime,size=401 │ ├─/dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev │ ├─/dev/hugepageshugetlbfs hugetlb rw,relatime,pagesize=2M │ ├─/dev/mqueue mqueue mqueue rw,relatime │ └─/dev/pts devpts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620, │ └─/dev/ptsdevpts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,g ├─/mnt/lfs/dev/sdb10 ext4rw,relatime │ ├─/mnt/lfs/dev udev devtmpf rw,nosuid,relatime,size=401 │ │ └─/mnt/lfs/dev/ptsdevpts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620, │ ├─/mnt/lfs/proc proc procrw,relatime │ ├─/mnt/lfs/sys sysfs sysfs rw,relatime │ └─/mnt/lfs/run tmpfs tmpfs rw,relatime The following are run from within the chroot environment: ls -l $LFS/var/run lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr 11 13:47 /var/run -> /run ls -l $LFS/dev/shm * nothing returned * ls -l $LFS/dev drwxr-xr-x 2 root root40 Apr 14 12:08 shm(it is listed despite not returning for the command above) based on your expected response, It appears to me that /dev/shm is not mounted correctly. If believe that is supposed to be achieved by this command: if [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ]; then mkdir -pv $LFS/$(readlink $LFS/dev/shm); fi Each of these commands return nil if run in isolation: [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ] ** i have no idea what is performed by this syntax ** readlink $LFS/dev/shm** maybe i missed a command to make this link? i don't see it in the end of chapter 5 ** -- I also received a response on the linuxquestions thread: https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=6110835#post6110835 The fellow mentioned that debian doesn't allow users to an su to unpermissioned user without password. So i tried to give nobody a password. While this didn't change the response in chroot, it did allow the command to pass as root outside of chroot. However, the result was full of errors, which I guess is not surprising given the environment. - Thanks everyone for the suggestions! -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:01:07PM +0800, devin operline wrote: > Hi there, > > This is my 3rd attempt at getting through LFS for the first time using > (Debian 10). It was a fresh install when I made my second attempt. Then > hit this error and redid chapters 4, 5 and 6 before failing at the same > place. While I'd typed all commands on my 2nd try (for better absorption), > I copied and pasted all commands this time (3rd) around > > On section 6.25 - GCC, I get the following error on the make check: > > su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" => > su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal > Beyond what other people have said, one item I noticed: > commands I've run based on different threads I've found usually referring > to different sections and/or previous versions of the book (as root, within > chroot) > ls -l /tools/bin/bash => -rwxr-xr-x > > ls -l /dev/pts => c- 1 root root 5, 2 Apr 12 10:22 ptmx > > tty => not a tty > > ldd /bin/bash => linux-vdso.so.1 > libncursesw.so.6 => not found ^^ (section 5.15.1, at the bottom - ln -s libncursesw.so /tools/lib/libncurses.so) At this point in the build, libncursesw.so can only be in /tools/lib. You showed output from ls -l for /lib, with it not present, but that is correct until a little later in chapter 6. ĸen -- The beauty of reading a page of de Selby is that it leads one inescapably to the conclusion that one is not, of all nincompoops, the greatest.-- du Garbandier -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
On 4/12/20 10:12 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2020, 22:01 +0800 schrieb devin operline:
Hi there,
This is my 3rd attempt at getting through LFS for the first time using (Debian
10). It was a fresh install when I made my second attempt. Then hit this
error and redid chapters 4, 5 and 6 before failing at the same place. While
I'd typed all commands on my 2nd try (for better absorption), I copied and
pasted all commands this time (3rd) around
On section 6.25 - GCC, I get the following error on the make check:
su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" =>
su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal
commands I've run based on different threads I've found usually referring to
different sections and/or previous versions of the book (as root, within chroot)
ls -l /tools/bin/bash => -rwxr-xr-x
ls -l /dev/pts => c- 1 root root 5, 2 Apr 12 10:22 ptmx
tty => not a tty
ldd /bin/bash => linux-vdso.so.1
libncursesw.so.6 => not found
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6
/tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
ls -l /lib/{libreadline,libhistory,libncursesw,libdl,libc,ld}* =>
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1495440 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/ld-2.31.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ->
ld-2.31.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18445352 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libc-2.31.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.31.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 179648 Apr 11 14:43 /lib/libcrypt-2.31.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libcrypt.so.1 ->
libcrypt-2.31.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 251248 Apr 11 14:43 /lib/libdl-2.31.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.31.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libhistory.so.8 ->
libhistory.so.8.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 174272 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libhistory.so.8.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libreadline.so.8 ->
libreadline.so.8.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1092480 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libreadline.so.8.0
i had also checked some other permissions which are mentioned in this thread,
when I was trying to wrap my head around the controlling terminal:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-from-scratch-13/su-cannot-drop-the-controlling-terminal-6-25-gcc-4175671731/
Admittedly, I still don't really understand what is going on.
Any help or suggestions would be very much appreciated!
Thank you, take care,
Al
Hi Al,
dump question, but are the virtual filesystems mounted as described in
section 6.2 ?
Indeed. It looks like the virtual file systems are not correct. From
the *host*, run:
findmnt
You should have:
TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS
├─/mnt/lfs /dev/sda6 ext4 rw,noatime
│ ├─/mnt/lfs/dev devtmpfs devtmpfs
rw,relatime,size=8147408k,nr_inodes=2036852,mode=755
│ │ └─/mnt/lfs/dev/pts devpts devpts
rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000
│ ├─/mnt/lfs/proc proc proc rw,relatime
│ ├─/mnt/lfs/sys sysfs sysfsrw,relatime
│ ├─/mnt/lfs/run runtmpfsrw,relatime
Some of the options for /mnt/lfs/dev and /mnt/lfs/dev/pts may differ a
bit, but that's OK.
You should also have:
$ ls -l $LFS/var/run
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar 31 13:53 /mnt/lfs/var/run -> /run
$ ls -l $LFS/dev/shm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Mar 4 15:00 /mnt/lfs/dev/shm -> /run/shm
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2020, 22:01 +0800 schrieb devin operline:
> Hi there,
>
> This is my 3rd attempt at getting through LFS for the first time using
> (Debian 10). It was a fresh install when I made my second attempt. Then hit
> this error and redid chapters 4, 5 and 6 before failing at the same place.
> While I'd typed all commands on my 2nd try (for better absorption), I copied
> and pasted all commands this time (3rd) around
>
> On section 6.25 - GCC, I get the following error on the make check:
>
> su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" =>
> su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal
>
> commands I've run based on different threads I've found usually referring to
> different sections and/or previous versions of the book (as root, within
> chroot)
> ls -l /tools/bin/bash => -rwxr-xr-x
>
> ls -l /dev/pts => c- 1 root root 5, 2 Apr 12 10:22 ptmx
>
> tty => not a tty
>
> ldd /bin/bash => linux-vdso.so.1
> libncursesw.so.6 => not found
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6
> /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>
> ls -l /lib/{libreadline,libhistory,libncursesw,libdl,libc,ld}* =>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1495440 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/ld-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ->
> ld-2.31.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18445352 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libc-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.31.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 179648 Apr 11 14:43 /lib/libcrypt-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libcrypt.so.1 ->
> libcrypt-2.31.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 251248 Apr 11 14:43 /lib/libdl-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libhistory.so.8 ->
> libhistory.so.8.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 174272 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libhistory.so.8.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libreadline.so.8 ->
> libreadline.so.8.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1092480 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libreadline.so.8.0
>
> i had also checked some other permissions which are mentioned in this thread,
> when I was trying to wrap my head around the controlling terminal:
> https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-from-scratch-13/su-cannot-drop-the-controlling-terminal-6-25-gcc-4175671731/
>
> Admittedly, I still don't really understand what is going on.
>
> Any help or suggestions would be very much appreciated!
>
> Thank you, take care,
> Al
Hi Al,
dump question, but are the virtual filesystems mounted as described in
section 6.2 ?
--
Thomas
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC
On 2020-04-12 22:01 +0800, devin operline wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is my 3rd attempt at getting through LFS for the first time using (Debian
> 10). It was a fresh install when I made my second attempt. Then hit this
> error and redid chapters 4, 5 and 6 before failing at the same place. While
> I'd typed all commands on my 2nd try (for better absorption), I copied and
> pasted all commands this time (3rd) around
I digged up my mail archive for a while. Douglas said he'd been using Debian 10
as the host to build LFS. So I think it's not a bug of Debian or LFS book.
> On section 6.25 - GCC, I get the following error on the make check:
>
> su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" =>
> su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal
>
> commands I've run based on different threads I've found usually referring to
> different sections and/or previous versions of the book (as root, within
> chroot)
> ls -l /tools/bin/bash => -rwxr-xr-x
>
> ls -l /dev/pts => c- 1 root root 5, 2 Apr 12 10:22 ptmx
>
> tty => not a tty
>
> ldd /bin/bash => linux-vdso.so.1
> libncursesw.so.6 => not found
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6
> /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>
> ls -l /lib/{libreadline,libhistory,libncursesw,libdl,libc,ld}* =>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1495440 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/ld-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -> ld-
> 2.31.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18445352 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libc-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.31.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 179648 Apr 11 14:43 /lib/libcrypt-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libcrypt.so.1 -> libcrypt-
> 2.31.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 251248 Apr 11 14:43 /lib/libdl-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 11 14:44 /lib/libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.31.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libhistory.so.8 ->
> libhistory.so.8.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 174272 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libhistory.so.8.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libreadline.so.8 ->
> libreadline.so.8.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1092480 Apr 11 15:51 /lib/libreadline.so.8.0
All these seem OK.
Which version of LFS book are you using? And what is the output of "version-
check.sh" in sect. 2.2.?
--
Xi Ruoyao
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
