Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bacchanaly around Bug 81041
Hi Urmas, I'm not going to discuss the content of the bug itself. I'd like to discuss some other things: First of all: thanks for just bringing this to the list, instead of play cat and mouse in Bugzilla which result in a huge spam. Secondly, I'm not sure how you even can ask for an official reply on an email where hard working volunteers and our total community are called/questioned as morons and faggots. Kind regards, Joren Op 30-07-14 om 19:38 schreef Urmas: Interesting things happen in LO QA community. Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community. Thanks. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: is fdo#81113 a release blocker for 4.3.0?
Hi David, Thanks for bringing this to the mailinglists. op 16-07-14 16:01, David Tardon schreef: Hi all, Any opinions on $SUBJECT? The bug has got importance highest/critical; unfortunately it was triaged a day too late... Note that this is just one possible manifestation of the problem: the same misdetection (and failure to open the file) can happen whenever a remote file is opened. It depends on whether the file is detected before the Keynote filter is tried. I had a little chat with David in the IRC: (16:46:17) jorendc: dtardon: what file formats are affected do you think? (16:46:29) jorendc: dtardon: depending on that it might be a blocker or not (IMHO) (16:47:00) dtardon: jorendc, i have no idea. any that would come after keynote during the detection (16:47:28) jorendc: dtardon: is there a chronological list where I can see what comes after keynote detection? (16:48:27) dtardon: jorendc, no, there isn't (16:49:29) jorendc: dtardon: okay, I see. But I assume all ODF and other common file formats (OOXML,...) are non affected? I'm struggling about how many users'd be affected. (16:49:46) jorendc: And the fact we still advice to use 4.3.0 version for testing purpose (16:49:55) jorendc: (very) early adopters (16:50:05) dtardon: jorendc, these should be well before that Little summary: * As far I understand _most common_ file formats are not affected * We clearly state that point .0 versions are for testing/(very) early adopters only. As far I'm concerned: don't block the release of 4.3.0 but make sure it is in 4.3.1. Kind regards, Joren ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] is fdo#81113 a release blocker for 4.3.0?
Hi David, Thanks for bringing this to the mailinglists. op 16-07-14 16:01, David Tardon schreef: Hi all, Any opinions on $SUBJECT? The bug has got importance highest/critical; unfortunately it was triaged a day too late... Note that this is just one possible manifestation of the problem: the same misdetection (and failure to open the file) can happen whenever a remote file is opened. It depends on whether the file is detected before the Keynote filter is tried. I had a little chat with David in the IRC: (16:46:17) jorendc: dtardon: what file formats are affected do you think? (16:46:29) jorendc: dtardon: depending on that it might be a blocker or not (IMHO) (16:47:00) dtardon: jorendc, i have no idea. any that would come after keynote during the detection (16:47:28) jorendc: dtardon: is there a chronological list where I can see what comes after keynote detection? (16:48:27) dtardon: jorendc, no, there isn't (16:49:29) jorendc: dtardon: okay, I see. But I assume all ODF and other common file formats (OOXML,...) are non affected? I'm struggling about how many users'd be affected. (16:49:46) jorendc: And the fact we still advice to use 4.3.0 version for testing purpose (16:49:55) jorendc: (very) early adopters (16:50:05) dtardon: jorendc, these should be well before that Little summary: * As far I understand _most common_ file formats are not affected * We clearly state that point .0 versions are for testing/(very) early adopters only. As far I'm concerned: don't block the release of 4.3.0 but make sure it is in 4.3.1. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: Changes in SvgSvgNode::getSvgStyleAttributes()
Hi Regina, Tomaž, *
op 15-07-14 00:12, Regina Henschel schreef:
It is shown correctly. The style definition selector fits to the
element. Now put the rectangle into a group and define the style for
the group.
?xml version=1.0 standalone=no?
!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd;
svg xmlns=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; version=1.1
width=10cm height=5cm viewBox=0 0 1000 500
defs
style type=text/css![CDATA[
g {
fill: red;
stroke: blue;
stroke-width: 3
}
]]/style
/defs
g
rect x=200 y=100 width=600 height=300/
/g
/svg
This makes LO and AOO hang.
Following my backtrace it is caused here:
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x77baab2c in rtl_uString_ImplAlloc(int) () from
/home/joren/core/instdir/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
#0 0x77baab2c in rtl_uString_ImplAlloc(int) () from
/home/joren/core/instdir/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
#1 0x77bac25e in rtl_uString_newFromLiteral () from
/home/joren/core/instdir/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
#2 0x7fffcdea8f2d in
svgio::svgreader::SvgGNode::getSvgStyleAttributes() const () from
/home/joren/core/instdir/program/../program/libsvgiolo.so
#3 0x7fffcdeb3866 in
svgio::svgreader::SvgStyleAttributes::getParentStyle() const () from
/home/joren/core/instdir/program/../program/libsvgiolo.so
We can fix this hang on the same why I fixed fdo#78554, but now in
svggnode.cxx:
joren@jorenMint ~/core $ git diff
diff --git a/svgio/source/svgreader/svggnode.cxx
b/svgio/source/svgreader/svggno
index 82d3d5d..45fa6a3 100644
--- a/svgio/source/svgreader/svggnode.cxx
+++ b/svgio/source/svgreader/svggnode.cxx
@@ -43,7 +43,13 @@ namespace svgio
const SvgStyleAttributes* SvgGNode::getSvgStyleAttributes() const
{
-return checkForCssStyle(OUString(g), maSvgStyleAttributes);
+const SvgStyleAttributes* aCheckCssStyle =
checkForCssStyle(OUStrin
+const SvgStyleAttributes* aGetCssStyleParent =
maSvgStyleAttributes
+
+if (aGetCssStyleParent == NULL)
+return aCheckCssStyle;
+
+return aGetCssStyleParent;
}
@Tomaž: we need a different way of accessing this StyleAttributes?
Kind regards,
Joren
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 RC Bug Hunting Session
Bug Hunting Session is June 20, 21 and 22 :-). See you all by then! Kind regards, Joren Joel Madero schreef op 16/06/14 17:57: Hi All! Well after our incredible showing with Beta 1 we're going a second round of bug hunting against 4.3 Release Candidate 1 to try to catch any lingering nasty regressions before release. Literally anyone can help and we encourage everyone to jump into the QA chat and see what it's all about. To join just download and install the RC when it becomes available: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Then . . . just run it, play around with it, do what you normally do with LibreOffice. If something terrible happens like a crash or data loss - report it over at our bug tracker. That easy! Chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Wiki: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugHunting_Session_4.3.0_RC1 Blog(s) on last bug hunting session: https://joelmadero.wordpress.com/ Last one we saw about 15 new faces in our chat, if we could see another 15 this round it would be fantastic. Thanks all in advance! Best, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Whiteboard Statuses
Hi Xisco, *, Xisco Faulí schreef op 5/06/2014 10:32: does it make sense to include another status for the regression issues where the problematic commit has been identified ? I'm asking it because yesterday I spent some time on this task and I could chase down two regressions, one of them made by a Collabora developer ( I've already sent him an email ) and the other by a merged AOO commit. I'm not sure about this. If you did track the bug down to a single commit (or developer), I think the keyword 'regression' + whiteboard 'bibisected' + a ping on IRC/CC or email to the particular developer is the best way. I think having the commit range, clear step-by-step actions, good summary/title and prioritizing is the most important in that case. I'm quite sure a developer who's willing to hunt down a regression will see the comment pointing towards a particular bug. Especially if you comment on it and place him/her in CC at once. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Whiteboard Statuses
Hi, Jay Philips schreef op 5/06/2014 4:45: I think it might be a good idea to include the following whiteboard keywords - HasDebug or HasBacktrace HasStrace - When the bug reporter or commenter has included the backtrace or strace output, so devs can easily see this list I didn't invent it, but we have a keyword with 'have-backtrace' for this purpose. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Whiteboard Statuses
Hi Kohei, Kohei Yoshida schreef op 5/06/2014 15:06: So, to me personally, this practice of witch-hunting (or finger-pointing) really bogs me down, especially I receive such notice hundreds of times during a typical development cycle. Well, that's at least not what I'm talking about right now. (1) we (I) are (am) only talking about bugs we can track down to 1 single commit or developer. Not a developer in general by component (writer, calc, ...), which we do now to try to avoid as much as possible. I'm not sure that there are that many QA'ers or reporters which can track down to 1 single developer/commit? I'm not a developer at all and just to provide me an idea: do you still receive that much CC's on bugs compared to months/a year ago? (2) we discussed this yesterday on the QA-call too. Our conclusion was to just kindly ping a developer in particular on IRC. (https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2014/June_04#Topics_for_ESC.3F) If not I still am 'pro' an active approach and mail the particular developer (in private) or put him/her in CC. (3) and as far my experience concerns... I already know which developers are and are not open for a nice (not pointing, just asking) SINGLE message. I think other core QA members do have such experience too. Since statistically every change one makes can and will cause *some* regressions in some obscure corners, this disadvantages those who make lots of changes, even when those changes are to fix other regressions and bugs. True, but luckely not all regression cases are 'obscure' and border cases. And some of these sometimes escalate to a (often repeated) demand of a revert of the commit, which is another blow especially when the change itself took weeks and weeks of careful coding to get conceived. One can be as careful as possible, and still (and almost always) break somethign somewhere. Again: true. But we are not talking about: bug the particular developer as much as possible, if he doesn't react/revert/fix spam his email and IRC with threats to revert that commit ... I think we have to find the most constructive approach to get a regression bug fixed, with respect to the situation (developer, commit message, ...) and severity. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Whiteboard Statuses
Joel Madero schreef op 5/06/2014 17:26: Ah I didn't see that. We should change it to camel case to be consistent. HaveBacktrace. Will include on whiteboard page. Just to be sure: have-backtrace is a keyword and our key words are not camel-cased ;-). We may want to consider to make it more consistent if we have our own bugzilla instance :-)? Cheers, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Installation dependency bug reports
Hi, Can a developer please have a look to: * bug 77293 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77293) * bug 78234 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78234) Both reports are about a failing installation. As far I can see it looks like they fail both on the same error (failing installation of libobasis4.2 or lodevbasis4.3). Thanks in advance for your time, Joren ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Image Upload Problem with Bugzilla
Hi Jay, Jay Philips schreef op 26/04/2014 13:52: Everytime i upload a jpg or png on bugzilla, i have to go back into the file and change it mime type. Is this supposed to be like this? Sadly we are aware of this. We already did report it to FDO, but it is not fixed yet. If I'm correct this only happens when you attach the image/document at the creation of the bug itself, using the form at freedesktop (not our own BSA). Some devs and QA members are working hard to set up our own bugzilla. If done, we can hopefully have a look ourself. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Extensive docx conversion tests...
Hi Jay and other QA volunteers, Jay Philips schreef op 22/04/2014 5:51: snip Thanks for testing LibreOffice extensively :-). Just one more hint: if you found a bug, and before you report a bug, make sure the bug is still present in our latest master version. This is the version developers are currently working on (currently that is 4.3.0). If it is still reproducible in that version, you can be 99% sure it is not fixed yet. It might happen some bugs are still reproducible using 4.2.x or older versions, but are fixed in upcoming 4.3 versions :-). You can find this master builds over here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Extensive docx conversion tests...
Hi Jay, Jay Philips schreef op 26/04/2014 14:56: Hi Joren, Thanks for looking into my reports. I think we have to thank you for testing and your clean reports :-). I am testing it also on the master build, as you can see i do mention things like Tested in 4.0 - 4.3. and Regression starting in 4.2. Tested on 4.3 as well., stated that 4.3 alpha was also tested. :) Yes, my bad. I saw it afterwards too. Have a nice day, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisect suggestion
Bjoern Michaelsen schreef op 21/04/14 23:57: On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:43:43PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: From the QA meeting minutes: (*) SUGGESTION: Standardization of our summary field for Bugzilla (*) Or: When searching for one phrase, display results from a similar one (e.g. image - picture or graphic) Hmm, Im uncertain as to what the goal is here and if its reachable. I did this suggestion due the fact a couple of days ago: I found a new bug report I knew it already was reported earlier (dupe). while searching for a bugs with summary 'color', I didn't found the dupe. After 5 minutes I thought about searching for 'coloUr' which showed the original bug ... So my goal was to ease a bit our search for dupes. Kind regards, Joren signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Inserting an image from an URL removes page break in LO 4.1.5.3?
Thomas Hackert schreef op 6/04/14 09:00: I copied an image from https://www.google.com.mx/search?q=solsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=R5UyU5e5OOXLsQT8rIDAAwved=0CAYQ_AUoAQbiw=1024bih=483#facrc=_imgdii=_imgrc=LqB-IrJ9puxFEM%253A%3BJ_D6dBUvsAJ5qM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fupload.wikimedia.org%252Fwikipedia%252Fcommons%252Ff%252Ff6%252FAfiche_del_sol.svg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fes.wikipedia.org%252Fwiki%252FSol%3B3880%3B2560 into Writer via context menu and selecting Paste. This neither crashes nor slows down Writer, as the bug reporter has written it in his bug description. So far, so good :) But when I deselect the image, go to Insert – Manual Break... and press Enter, I can paste the same copy of this picture on the following page in LO Version: 4.2.3.3 Build ID: 6c3586f855673fa6a1576797f575b31ac6fa0ba3 (parallel installed, following the instructions from https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel) with Germanophone lang- as well as helppack under Debian Testing i686. So far, so good, so ... ;) But if I try the same with LO Version: 4.1.5.3 Build-ID: 1c1366bba2ba2b554cd2ca4d87c06da81c05d24, it removes the page break instead ... :( Tested using Mac OSX 10.9 with LibreOffice Version: 4.1.5.3 Build ID: 1c1366bba2ba2b554cd2ca4d87c06da81c05d24 I also can reproduce a major slowdown and freezes. Also I can reproduce the fact the second pasted image removes the page break. Steps to reproduce: 1. Go to the above mentioned Gargle link 2. Rightclick on one of the images and choose Copy image (or something like that. In German, it is Grafik kopieren) 3. Open Writer 4. Rightclick in Writer and choose Paste 5. Click somewhere next to the image to deselect it 6. Go to Insert – Manual Break... 7. Press the Enter key 8. Try this in 4.1.5.3 as well as 4.2.3.3. You will see, that in 4.2.3.3 the page break will still be there after inserting the image on the second side. In LO 4.1.5.3 this page break will vanish ... :( Confirmed, in 4.2.3.3 the page break retains. Can someone confirm it with a different OS/architecture or even in an older version of LO? Does anybody know, if this is already reported? Or should I add this as a comment to bug #76624?? Not sure this is already reported, but I'm not sure reporting a bug for LibreOffice 4.1-branch is worth it. If we find/bibisect the commit that fixed this issue, it may not be backportable to upcoming EOL version 4.1.6. Also it _might_ be fixed thanks to the fix of bug 52547 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52547) Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call 2014-01-09
Markus Mohrhard schreef op 15/01/14 12:49: You can help by fixing the crashes or validation errors. Additionally there are a number of scripting tasks to make the information a bit pretty. I did make a little python stats script that can display the total number of passers/crashers per mimetype, that is parsed to csv format. Easy to open using LibreOffice (of course ;-) ) and do some calculations/visualization on it. I guess that's already a good starting point for stats, but sadly I don't have time to develop it any further next month or so (exams, master thesis, ...). IMHO it makes no sense to treat them as normal bugs or check the bug reports. The bug numbers in there are just part of the name of the file. It does not mean that they have any relations to the bug report. From my point of view the crash testing is more a developer tool that we use similar to unit tests to improve quality. From a QA perspective I think you can just enjoy the numbers and the improved quality. True. For a non-developer, but QA volunteer, I am only interested in the numbers. (trend per mimetype, and general trend). Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Robinson Tryon schreef op 17/12/13 13:41: Hi everyone, Here are the final tallies from the voting: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_16#PENDING_ITEM:_Bugzilla_Migration_etc. blo (1) libo (2) lbz (3) lob (3) lo (6) lobz (7) - Separated by just a single vote, lo and lobz are (unsurprisingly) the favorites :-) What about lbz, which is a combination of our 2 top-votes (lo and lobz)? lbz was also one of the choises, but it looks like a golden midway between the top votes :)? Just my 2 cents Kind regards, Joren ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Welcome screen help button redirects to wrong page
Alex Thurgood schreef op 13/12/13 19:37: Hi, This may have already been noticed, but has anyone noticed that current master builds of 4.2 , when clicking on the Welcome screen on startup of LO, point to : http://www.libreoffice.org/ Corresponding bug report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72420 Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Base Show stopper in LibreOffice 4.2 Beta2
Dan Lewis schreef op 13/12/13 23:16: I just filed a bug, but I was not given a number for it. Running a search query (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedemailreporter1=1list_id=374629email1=elderdanlewis%40gmail.comproduct=LibreOfficeemailtype1=substring) result in this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72696 I have a database three tables that are related. Table A has a foreign key linked to the primary key of Table B. Table B has a foreign key linked to the primary key of Table C. I created a form containing these three tables and added data to it. Normally, when you change the visible record of Table B, the visible records for Table A should also change. They do when using 4.1.4.1, but for 4.2 Beta2, they don't. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Math] Clicking in Formular does not let the cursor change its position in the main part
Thomas Hackert schreef op 8/12/13 18:24: . If I copy this formular to Math, then click on the formular in the main window, I cannot see the cursor jumping to its corresponding position ... :( Is it only on my system? Or can anyone else with a different OS/architecture confirm this? Or is this an error in the test description? Tested using: Mac OSX 10.9 with LibreOffice Version: 4.2.0.0.beta2 Build ID: 1a27be92e320f97c20d581a69ef1c8b99ea9885d I see a blinking cursor in the edit-window, nicely where I clicked in the main window. So I can not reproduce this behavior. Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
Robinson Tryon schreef op 1/12/13 19:31: Well...looks like it's time to take a vote :P Voting Rules: * Please vote for as many of the listed choices as you like (Approval Voting) * Per our discussion, I'm reserving 'tdf' for future use * If there's no clear winner, we can have a run-off Here's the list (in alphabetical order): * blo No * lbz Yes * libo Yes * lo No * lob Yes * lobz Yes If I only can make 1 vote: libo Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fantastic Work QA Team :)
Joel Madero schreef op 24/11/13 18:04: Hi All, Last week I sent out an email congratulating the team for getting the bug count down to 1,1,24 unconfirmed bugs (this was down nearly 100 in just a couple weeks). Well, thanks to some incredible effort by members of the team, we're now down to 987 bugs - in just 3 days (yes, 3) we've dropped the number by nearly 150 bugs. We've also handled a ton of the really old unconfirmed bugs which is great. To visualize this spectacular drop: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets=UNCONFIRMED Nice work team! Kind regards, Joren ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
