Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.6 not yet available for download
Hi Tommy, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: I received the release announcement of 4.2.6 You saw an announcement for the rc2 - i.e. it is available on the prereleases page. http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ but I still don't see it available to download from LibO website where 4.2.5 is still shown. Yes, as 4.2.6 final announcement has not yet been sent. but you can download rc2 as well - as it looks now it will be the final version. ciao Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Toolbar Proposal Completed
Hi Jay, all, Le 30/07/2014 02:09, Jay Philips a écrit : Hi Joel, Well the UX team is already CCed in the bug report and i guess they will get around to it whenever they do, which i assume will take a while. Have my fingers crossed that some portions of the proposal lands in master or the release after that. Definitely think it will help differentiate LO's look from OOo/AOO. But I was mainly just sharing my work with the QA team, as it was a happy occasion for me that i was able to complete it, as this is the team i'm with and welcomed their constructive criticism of it. :D The UX team is currently migrating his work to Redmine, they will have a forum here, a wiki, and ticketing. May be you should open a ticket on Redmine in their area and link to your issue on BZ and then post on their forum. Let me know if you need my help :) Cheers Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.6 not yet available for download
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:27:31 +0200, Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Tommy, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: I received the release announcement of 4.2.6 You saw an announcement for the rc2 - i.e. it is available on the prereleases page. http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ but I still don't see it available to download from LibO website where 4.2.5 is still shown. Yes, as 4.2.6 final announcement has not yet been sent. sorry my bad... :-) I misunderstood the release mail. but you can download rc2 as well - as it looks now it will be the final version. ciao Christian ___ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] 4.3 final on BSA
Hi all, Just a note that 4.3.0.4 or final is missing on BSA. Cheers Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 700 unconfirmed bugs milestone broke
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 09:58:56PM +0200, Tommy wrote: just to say that the count is now 699 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOfficeformat=tableaction=wrap great job QA team!!! Indeed, congratulations everyone! Just before release, we were back to 713. But still: we are currently at an all-time low ever since unconfirmed is the default for new bugs: https://plus.google.com/101094190333184858950/posts/XToT8Qt3WXZ Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 700 unconfirmed bugs milestone broke
Great job, guys ! On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: just to say that the count is now 699 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_ statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOffice format=tableaction=wrap some nice chart: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets= UNCONFIRMEDdatasets=NEEDINFO great job QA team!!! -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/ mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to- unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Bacchanaly around Bug 81041
Interesting things happen in LO QA community. Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community. Thanks. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bacchanaly around Bug 81041
I suggest everyone ignore this On 07/30/2014 10:38 AM, Urmas wrote: Interesting things happen in LO QA community. Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community. Language like this is completely unacceptable and it's not the first time that you've been told this. With that, I have no other comment on any other part of this. Best, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bacchanaly around Bug 81041
Hi Urmas, I'm not going to discuss the content of the bug itself. I'd like to discuss some other things: First of all: thanks for just bringing this to the list, instead of play cat and mouse in Bugzilla which result in a huge spam. Secondly, I'm not sure how you even can ask for an official reply on an email where hard working volunteers and our total community are called/questioned as morons and faggots. Kind regards, Joren Op 30-07-14 om 19:38 schreef Urmas: Interesting things happen in LO QA community. Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community. Thanks. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: Re: Bacchanaly around Bug 81041
op 30-07-14 19:38, Urmas schreef: Interesting things happen in LO QA community. Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community. Urmas, I checked bug 81041 trace. We are and will remain a respectful community. That is fixed in our foundation (TDF). If you disagree with others I´d advice: discuss via other means then bug reports + mailing lists. Look for the dialogue and discussion. Luc attachment: luc_castermans.vcf___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing for bug 81592: Bad Quality/Rendering of EPS graphics in LO 4.2 and 4.3 (regression)
Gerry T. wrote While the rendering quality of EPS in LO 4.0/4.1 was 'production quality', the rendering in 4.2 4.3 regressed and is unusable for publishing. It may be that there is a regression, but as pointed out in comment 4 and in this report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67464 ... EPS rendering has never been production quality. It may have been /acceptable/ under an earlier version, but that may also have been due to luck or a hack, since there is no native rendering for EPS. Best wishes, Owen. - Best wishes, Owen. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Testing-for-bug-81592-Bad-Quality-Rendering-of-EPS-graphics-in-LO-4-2-and-4-3-regress-tp4116895p4116948.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bacchanaly around Bug 81041
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community. What sort of answer do you expect? You want us to escalate on non sense? OK sophie, I'm convinced... As I said before I can stomach quite a bit of trolling on users@ and discuss@ but BZ and libreoffice-qa@ are place where serious work is done and volunteer here should not have to waste their time dealing with that nonsense. Norbert --- Norbert Thiébaud, Deputy Board of Director, TDF Tel: +49 30 5557992-50 | Mail: flo...@documentfoundation.org The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
