Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs
Hi Urs, [1] I have moved to Git. [2] The new method of using ScholarLy is all working (when I engrave through Frescobaldi), but it does give me these warnings first: openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: Bassoon 2 warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: Notes warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: Bassoon 2 warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: Baritone Saxophone warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: Notes warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: Baritone Saxophone [3] However, when I try to engrave using my Makefile I get an error: cannot find file: `openlilylib' Craig On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 9:02:14 AM Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 07.02.2015 um 11:37 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Urs, I tried and failed to understand the ouput Here is the ouput error. Processing `/Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Maximes_Music/French_music/Berlioz/lilypond/Score/Berlioz-01-score.ly' Parsing... openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: Bassoon 2 warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: Notes warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: #t /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:156:34 http://0: In procedure string-symbol in expression (string-symbol ctx-id): /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:156:34 http://1: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting string): #t Exited with return code 1. Thanks for testing. It turned out to be a simple error in the conditional evaluation of the different possibilities to determine a context name. This shows that one should actually have a comprehensive test suite ... I have pushed the update to Github so you can get it from there. I see that you have stored openlilylib in a Dropbox folder. You really should consider using Git, if only for getting stuff from Github. It makes managing repositories like openlilylib so much cleaner ... Best Urs On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 7:19:25 PM Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 07.02.2015 um 07:54 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 7. Februar 2015 04:47:11 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com craig.dabelst...@gmail.com: Dear Urs, All good. I've followed all your instructions -- no problem. However, perhaps I'm putting \setOption scholarly.annotate.export-targets #'(latex plaintext) in the wrong place. I put this in the main-init.ily file, yes? When I try to engrave the score I get this error: Parsing... openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:150:34 0: In procedure string-symbol in expression (string-symbol ctx-id): /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:150:34 1: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting string): #t Exited with return code 1. This looks like a bug to me. It seems you managed to use a constellation I failed to check. This is in the code where the name of the context is determined. Please try with a simple example file to check whether you can get it to compile at all. Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to work on this today at all. There's something you can do to debug: - Open openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily - Locate the (set! annotation, should be line 145 - Insert the following lines _before_ this line: (oll:warn \n\context\ property: ~a (assoc-ref annotation context)) (oll:warn \actual-context-id: ~a (ly:context-id context)) (oll:warn \context-id\ property: ~a (assoc-ref annotation context-id)) (oll:warn Resulting \ctx-id\: ~a\n ctx-id) This will output like the following for each annotation: warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: \new warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: usage-examples warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: usage-examples Hopefully you'll get some meaningful information just before the offending annotation. If you can't find it or can't make sense of it you can also send me the whole console output. Urs Best Urs . Craig On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 11:23:04 AM Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 07.02.2015 um 00:40 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 07.02.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi List, Sorry for the frustrating question, but how do I combine Samuel's code -- @[^@]*@ -- with an annotate message such as
Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs
The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax. Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Annotate-and-Lilyglyphs-tp171471p171599.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Adding lyrics to basic drum beat
On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 13:20 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
2015-02-07 11:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com:
2015-02-07 9:30 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com writes:
returns:
warning: cannot find Voice `DV'
\new Lyrics
\lyricsto DV { One Two Three Four }
Coding \layout instead of \midi (or commenting it) will show correct
assigned lyrics, though.
The context hierarchy is supposed to behave the same for all outputs (of
course, unless you mess around with output definitions). If it doesn't,
that's a bug. I propose entering it in the tracker. I don't have a
good idea off the bat what may be causing this behavior.
--
David Kastrup
It's now issue 4281:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4281
Cheers,
Harm
Hi Kevin,
in the light of
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4281#c2
you can do for 2.18.2:
\version 2.18.2
\paper { ragged-right = ##f }
m =
\new DrumStaff
\new DrumVoice \drummode { \voiceOne hh4 hh hh r hh }
\new DrumVoice = dv \drummode { \voiceTwo bd4 sn bd r sn }
\new Lyrics
\lyricsto dv { One Two Three Four }
\score {
\m
\layout { }
}
\score {
\m
\midi {
\context {
\DrumVoice
\alias Voice
}
}
}
Thanks David K.,
Harm
You guys are great. Thanks so much!
Namaste,
Kevin Tough
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs
Am 08.02.2015 um 09:33 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Hi Urs, [1] I have moved to Git. That's a good thing. You'll see in a minute. [2] The new method of using ScholarLy is all working (when I engrave through Frescobaldi), but it does give me these warnings first: openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: Bassoon 2 warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: Notes warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: Bassoon 2 warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: Baritone Saxophone warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: Notes warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: Baritone Saxophone Hihi, I should try that with our 1.000+ annotations Fried score ;-/ When fixing the previous bug I forgot to remove the debug output. Now I've pushed the fix you can simply do git pull from inside the repository and have the update. [3] However, when I try to engrave using my Makefile I get an error: cannot find file: `openlilylib' I don't know your makefile, and actually I don't have any experience with makefiles. But that error means that ???/openlilylib/ly is not in the include path passed to LilyPond. HTH Urs Craig On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 9:02:14 AM Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org mailto:u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 07.02.2015 um 11:37 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: Urs, I tried and failed to understand the ouput Here is the ouput error. Processing `/Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Maximes_Music/French_music/Berlioz/lilypond/Score/Berlioz-01-score.ly' Parsing... openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] warning: openLilyLib: context property: #f warning: openLilyLib: actual-context-id: Bassoon 2 warning: openLilyLib: context-id property: Notes warning: openLilyLib: Resulting ctx-id: #t /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:156:34 http://0: In procedure string-symbol in expression (string-symbol ctx-id): /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:156:34 http://1: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting string): #t Exited with return code 1. Thanks for testing. It turned out to be a simple error in the conditional evaluation of the different possibilities to determine a context name. This shows that one should actually have a comprehensive test suite ... I have pushed the update to Github so you can get it from there. I see that you have stored openlilylib in a Dropbox folder. You really should consider using Git, if only for getting stuff from Github. It makes managing repositories like openlilylib so much cleaner ... Best Urs On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 7:19:25 PM Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org mailto:u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 07.02.2015 um 07:54 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 7. Februar 2015 04:47:11 MEZ, schrieb Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com mailto:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com: Dear Urs, All good. I've followed all your instructions -- no problem. However, perhaps I'm putting \setOption scholarly.annotate.export-targets #'(latex plaintext) in the wrong place. I put this in the main-init.ily file, yes? When I try to engrave the score I get this error: Parsing... openLilyLib: library infrastructure successfully loaded. Interpreting music...[8][16][24] /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:150:34 0: In procedure string-symbol in expression (string-symbol ctx-id): /Users/craigdabelstein/Dropbox/Lilypond/openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily:150:34 1: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting string): #t Exited with return code 1. This looks like a bug to me. It seems you managed to use a constellation I failed to check. This is in the code where the name of the context is determined. Please try with a simple example file to check whether you can get it to compile at all. Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to work on this today at all. There's something you can do to debug: * Open openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/__main__.ily * Locate the (set! annotation, should be line 145 * Insert the following lines _before_ this line: (oll:warn \n\context\ property: ~a (assoc-ref annotation context)) (oll:warn \actual-context-id:
Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2: The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax. which example file? I don't see any in my working directory. Urs Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Annotate-and-Lilyglyphs-tp171471p171599.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs
The annotate.ly file in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/examples/ Philippe Le 8 févr. 2015 à 11:16, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org a écrit : Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2: The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax. which example file? I don't see any in my working directory. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Annotate and Lilyglyphs
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Philippe Massart: The annotate.ly file in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/annotate/examples/ OK. This is the old one, a new one is in openlilylib/ly/scholarly/usage-examples/annotate.ly This is not really complete or well-enough tested, but I've now committed that and removed the other one. So it should be fixed upstream now. Urs Philippe Le 8 févr. 2015 à 11:16, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org a écrit : Am 08.02.2015 um 11:08 schrieb flup2: The few tests I made are working fine now; the only not working thing is the example file that still uses the former loading and options syntax. which example file? I don't see any in my working directory. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with r2. in two voices
Hi Kieren, the output has indeed only one dot. But at least here it puts the dot in the upper staff space (where the e'' is) and not next to the rest. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid
Hi Urs, Can anyone tell me (or Matteo) if there have been any significant changes in lyrics handling that may cause this? For it to behave as expected, you now need \new Voice (where you didn’t before) — maybe that’s messing things up? Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid)
Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Tablature - Hide Tied Notes
I just recently upgraded to Fedora 21 which upgraded my Lilypond to 2.18.2. In previous versions the tied notes were hidden, but now they remain visible. I had been using the following snippet to hide them, but it doesn't seem to work anymore: #(define (tie::tab-clear-tied-fret-numbers grob) (let* ((tied-fret-nr (ly:spanner-bound grob RIGHT))) (ly:grob-set-property! tied-fret-nr 'transparent #t))) Is there a new improved way to hide the tied notes using full-notation tablature? Mike -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Tablature-Hide-Tied-Notes-tp171610.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid)
Am 08.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Hm, I don't find this so awesome, tends to be not so readable ;-) And it seems to encourage making errors or mixing staves (e.g. writing articulations between staves without clear attribution ;-) Urs Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Hungarian Gregorian
Dear Pierre,
Thank you for correcting something in connection with the dots,
But we have still a problem with it. The program puts one dot in a right
place and plus one above...
I attached.
Thank you!
Sister Judit
\version 2.19.15
\include modernGregorian.ily
%\pointAndClickOff
\language deutsch
\header {
tagline = ##f
}
melisma = #(define-music-function (parser location mus)
(ly:music?)
#{
{ \neume { $mus } \omit Accidental h }
#})
myMelodyantifónaNégy = \transpose c c' {
\clef G
\omit Stem
\key d\major
\melisma { f4 g \lst a4.} -- double dot... how to make it simple?
\bar |.
}
myLyricsantifónaNégy = \lyricmode {
}
\score {
\cadenzaOn
\new Voice = MyMelodyantifónaNégy \myMelodyantifónaNégy
\new Lyrics \lyricsto MyMelodyantifónaNégy \myLyricsantifónaNégy
\layout { }
\header {
piece = \markup {
\fontsize #2
{
\bold 4.
Kórus:
}
}
}
}
\paper {
indent = 0
top-margin = 15
left-margin = 20
right-margin = 20
system-system-spacing = #'((minimum-distance . 16))
}___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with r2. in two voices
Hi Cynthia,
I guess the only way out is to rewrite the two voices so that one of them
issues hidden rests in the score, but the rests in the parts, via tags.
Not at all… I can think of about a half-dozen other ways to make that happen in
Lilypond.
This would be my preference, since it would be applied globally:
\version 2.19.15
#(define (rest-score r)
(let ((score 0)
(yoff (ly:grob-property-data r 'Y-offset))
(sp (ly:grob-property-data r 'staff-position)))
(if (number? yoff)
(set! score (+ score 2))
(if (eq? yoff 'calculation-in-progress)
(set! score (- score 3
(and (number? sp)
(= 0 2 sp)
(set! score (+ score 2))
(set! score (- score (abs (- 1 sp)
score))
#(define (merge-rests-on-positioning grob)
(let* ((can-merge #f)
(elts (ly:grob-object grob 'elements))
(num-elts (and (ly:grob-array? elts)
(ly:grob-array-length elts)))
(two-voice? (= num-elts 2)))
(if two-voice?
(let* ((v1-grob (ly:grob-array-ref elts 0))
(v2-grob (ly:grob-array-ref elts 1))
(v1-rest (ly:grob-object v1-grob 'rest))
(v2-rest (ly:grob-object v2-grob 'rest)))
(and
(ly:grob? v1-rest)
(ly:grob? v2-rest)
(let* ((v1-duration-log (ly:grob-property v1-rest 'duration-log))
(v2-duration-log (ly:grob-property v2-rest 'duration-log))
(v1-dot (ly:grob-object v1-rest 'dot))
(v2-dot (ly:grob-object v2-rest 'dot))
(v1-dot-count (and (ly:grob? v1-dot)
(ly:grob-property v1-dot 'dot-count -1)))
(v2-dot-count (and (ly:grob? v2-dot)
(ly:grob-property v2-dot 'dot-count -1
(set! can-merge
(and
(number? v1-duration-log)
(number? v2-duration-log)
(= v1-duration-log v2-duration-log)
(eq? v1-dot-count v2-dot-count)))
(if can-merge
;; keep the rest that looks best:
(let* ((keep-v1? (= (rest-score v1-rest)
(rest-score v2-rest)))
(rest-to-keep (if keep-v1? v1-rest v2-rest))
(dot-to-kill (if keep-v1? v2-dot v1-dot)))
;; uncomment if you're curious of which rest was chosen:
;;(ly:grob-set-property! v1-rest 'color green)
;;(ly:grob-set-property! v2-rest 'color blue)
(ly:grob-suicide! (if keep-v1? v2-rest v1-rest))
(if (ly:grob? dot-to-kill)
(ly:grob-suicide! dot-to-kill))
(ly:grob-set-property! rest-to-keep 'direction 0)
(ly:rest::y-offset-callback rest-to-keep)))
(if can-merge
#t
(ly:rest-collision::calc-positioning-done grob
Aa = \relative c'' { \oneVoice r2. }
Ab = \relative c'' { \oneVoice r2. }
\score {
\new Staff \with { \override RestCollision.positioning-done =
#merge-rests-on-positioning }
\time 3/4
\new Voice \Aa \\
\new Voice \Ab
}
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, composer
www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info
email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [openLilyLib] Fundamental reorganization started
Am 08.02.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Urs Liska: We had already made some promising experiments, but only using the header-style documentation and usage examples mentioned above. See http://openlilylib.org/oll-test/index.html to get a first idea. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Octave check for c
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 08:28:00AM +0100, Noeck wrote:
Hi Teoh,
I can see no problem:
\version 2.18.2
{ g=4 }
\relative c'' { g='4 g,=4 g=4 }
Can you send a minimal example showing your problem?
[...]
Sorry for the false alarm, folks, I can't reproduce the problem now
either. The above syntax works just fine. I'm thinking I probably
mistyped the syntax before, perhaps I swapped the = with the duration,
or something like that.
T
--
Hi. 'Lo.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with r2. in two voices
On Feb 7, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
wrote:
Hi Cynthia,
In fact the output generated is just nonsensical. Two stacked augmentation
dots? That just doesn’t seem right.
No, it’s perfectly sensible, if you want (need) to make it visually explicit
that there are two voices at the same time — otherwise, how would the reader
know?
But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to
make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why each voice
has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And why is it only
rests and notes that have augmentation dots are affected in \oneVoice mode this
way? There is no way other than clashing note column warnings to tell that two
voices have each issued concurrent rests in \oneVoice mode. It’s just kind of
weird that augmentation dots get this special treatment.
I guess the only way out is to rewrite the two voices so that one of them
issues hidden rests in the score, but the rests in the parts, via tags.
Consider, for example, the following related snippet:
\version 2.19.15
\score {
\new Staff
\time 4/2
{ d''2 c''1. } \\
\new Voice { b'2 c''1. }
}
The reason this output makes sense is the same reason there are two stacked
augmentation dots in your rest example.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 12:03AM , Paul Scott wrote:
What kind of music are you trying to write?
Paul Scott
Concerto Op3 No12 by Francesco Manfredini.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[openLilyLib] Fundamental reorganization started
Hello everybody, triggered by some comments on my last post http://lilypondblog.org/2015/01/introducing-scholarly/ I decided to pick up a few loose ends that have been lying around for some time now, so I finally started restructuring openLilyLib, aiming at a quite fundamental change. So this message is directed (in descending order of relevance) to * Those who have already taken part in openLilyLib reorganization discussions some half a year ago * Everybody who has contributed to openLilyLib so afr * All openLilyLib users * All other LilyPond users/developers Some motivations to do that now: * (Valid) Questions were raised if it is a good idea to have many different libraries scattered around. * Every now and then the idea arose to create some sort of consistent interface/infrastructure/specifications to create/distribute/use libraries to extend LilyPond's functionality without having to stuff everything into Lily herself. * openLilyLib has become a somewhat bubbly, unconcrete collection of code. I had ideas about the topic that were partially very clear, partially rather vague. But now I simply started the task with the initial goal of moving ScholarLY into the new structure before I had done too much that would have to be reverted or modified later. I intended to finish a certain step and announce the project in a blog post, but I decided to start discussion somewhat earlier and here on the list for two reasons: I'll be away for a week (with only mobile phone internet access) and won't be able to reach that state before. And I think I'd prefer getting feedback before stepping too far. So what follows is partially an explanation of what I've done, of what I intend to do next, and it's about opening discussion what direction this should take. Please understand that it's not about discussing a finished and polished project. ### Basic structure/concept Currently openLilyLib is a library of includable LilyPond files, organized in a directory structure which intends to represent its conceptional hierarchy. In the new structure openLilyLib will be a repository of libraries, each one living in a subdirectory of the top-level /ly directory. While these library are also simple directories within the repository they are conceptually different in that adding a library has to be a significantly more deliberate act than just creating a new directory when one doesn't really know where to put a new function: * A library must have a maintainer who is responsible for the library's target and also for code contributions * A library must have a clearly visible purpose, and it must have been discussed that such an addition makes sense (i.e. that the intended code shouldn't rather be added to other, existing libraries) * A library must have a certain weight that might justify setting up a subdomain like scholarly.openlilylib.org (doesn't exist, just an example) The idea is that openLilyLib becomes a one-stop-shop solution for LilyPond extension, so it will be easy to share functionality and have other users easily get hold of it. This will also make it possible for tools (e.g. LilyPond editors) to depend on external LilyPond code by simply directing their users to get hold of that one repository as a dependency. The hope is that such a set-up will encourage the community to share code and enable people to use LilyPond without having to reinvent the wheel each time (just as I wouldn't want to implement regular expression searching in any programming language but rather use an existing library for that). ### Accessing openLilyLib and its libraries Installing openLilyLib involves the following steps (also needed if you want to contribute to the current discussion): * Downloading/cloning openLilyLib from https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib (if you haven't done so already) * Adding its root path to LilyPond's include path (if you haven't done so already) * Adding its top-level /ly directory to LilyPond's include path. Once everything has been migrated the root path include can be dropped but for now this doubled include is unfortunately necessary. Step one for using is to activate openLilyLib with \include openlilylib This will already load some common infrastructure and functionality, mostly because openLilyLib itself needs it, but it is also available for users' files. Examples already available are: * LilyPond version predicates which make it possible for libraries to support different LilyPond versions by conditionally executing code through things e.g. #(if (lilypond-greater-than? 2.19.4) ... * Logging Commands like oll:log, oll:warn etc. that trigger messages (and log them to files) when a certain log-level is set * alist access Taken from Jan-Peter's library it greatly simplifies the handling of (nested) association lists. This is an example of functionality included
Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid
Hi Matteo,
as I've already expressed privately I think this is a great project -
thank you for following up on my ideas. If I get the README right this
will in fact overcome several limitations of my so-far manual approach.
I hope we'll be able to make that generally available in the most
straight-forward manner.
However, your example files don't compile with LilyPond 2.19. (the
oldest 2.19 I can test is 2.19.6, so I don't exactly know where it
breaks). 2.18.2 works fine but 2.19.x results in
Parsing...
/home/uliska/git/openlilylib/gridly/example/multi-file/../../grid-templates.ily:31:44
0: error: syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION, expecting
\sequential or \simultaneous or or '{'
\new Lyrics \lyricsto soprano
\gridGetLyrics soprano $segments
and then of course numerous follow-up errors.
Can anyone tell me (or Matteo) if there have been any significant
changes in lyrics handling that may cause this?
Urs
Am 07.02.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Matteo Ceccarello:
Hi all!
I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly)
implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his
blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including
some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post
(http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) .
Basically this library allows to define and populate a grid with music
without resorting to a preprocessing of the input files with external
scripts. It still is in early development, however I find it already
pretty usable. If you are interested, take a look at the code on
https://github.com/Cecca/gridly :-)
Cheers,
Matteo
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid)
Am 8. Februar 2015 21:56:28 MEZ, schrieb tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com: Conor, et. al., Looking closely at the score, I don't believe the staff lines are pre-fixed at all, since I can see variable spacing. I can't say for anything beyond the one page in the pdf, of course. My experience tells me that LilyPond can manage just about anything I throw at it :) As for making the font, it wouldn't be that difficult. Create missing glyphs will be relatively easy since it's a hand-writing style, so I wouldn't need a lot of reference material. It would take some time and work, however, so if there's enough interest in it, some financial sponsoring would be very helpful, though not required. Cool idea, Kieren! Where is this sample from? Here's the whole thing: Http://beautifulscores.net/fried/fullscore.pdf -Abraham Sent from my iPhone On Feb 8, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Conor Cook [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n171621...@n5.nabble.com wrote: It looks like an extremely neat handwritten score, but probably written on staves that were already set, space-wise. I wonder if it could be modified for the purposes of Lilypond, while retaining its distinct features. ~Conor -- Forwarded message -- From: Kieren MacMillan [hidden email] To: Urs Liska [hidden email], Abraham Lee [hidden email] Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List [hidden email] Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:25:13 -0500 Subject: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid) Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: [hidden email] -- Forwarded message -- From: Urs Liska [hidden email] To: Kieren MacMillan [hidden email], Abraham Lee [hidden email] Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List [hidden email] Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:43:37 +0100 Subject: Re: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid) Am 08.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Hm, I don't find this so awesome, tends to be not so readable ;-) And it seems to encourage making errors or mixing staves (e.g. writing articulations between staves without clear attribution ;-) Urs Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: [hidden email] ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-font-was-Re-Gridly-simple-Segmented-Grid-tp171621.html To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-font-was-Re-Gridly-simple-Segmented-Grid-tp171621p171623.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fwd: RE: How to remove gap in UpPrall spanner?
Am 08.02.2015 um 22:05 schrieb Ed Gordijn:
This is even better then perfection.
Hi,
I tried almost the same:
\version 2.18.2
\relative c'' {
\override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text =
\markup\concat{
\raise #1.0
\smaller
\musicglyph #scripts.upprall
\hspace #-0.5
}
\override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.padding = #'0
\override TrillSpanner.to-barline = ##t
a4\startTrillSpan a a a
a\stopTrillSpan
\override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text =
\markup\concat{
\raise #.15
\fontsize #-5
\bold (
\hspace #-0.58
}
a4\startTrillSpan a a
a\stopTrillSpan
\override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text =
\markup\concat{
\raise #.1
\fontsize #-5
\rotate #-7 \sans (
\hspace #-0.61
}
a4\startTrillSpan a a
a\stopTrillSpan
}
But I didn’t post it here, because I was not satisfied with it for these
reasons:
- the the lower edge of the roman paranthesis is too sharp
- the sans version is a bit too light (bold would be too much)
- the whole trill span is shifted upwards, even thought the parenthesis does
not collide with the stems below.
Perhaps you like them anyway.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with r2. in two voices
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com wrote: But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That’s why each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And why is it only rests and notes that have augmentation dots are affected in \oneVoice mode this way? There is no way other than clashing note column warnings to tell that two voices have each issued concurrent rests in \oneVoice mode. It’s just kind of weird that augmentation dots get this special treatment. I think you are misusing \oneVoice here; it isn't for merging things into a single voice, but rather for telling LilyPond that there is only one voice that it needs to position on the staff. If you are still `feeding' it two (or more) voices you will have to do some extra work to tell LilyPond what to do or you will get errors and/or unintended output. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid)
Conor, et. al., Looking closely at the score, I don't believe the staff lines are pre-fixed at all, since I can see variable spacing. I can't say for anything beyond the one page in the pdf, of course. My experience tells me that LilyPond can manage just about anything I throw at it :) As for making the font, it wouldn't be that difficult. Create missing glyphs will be relatively easy since it's a hand-writing style, so I wouldn't need a lot of reference material. It would take some time and work, however, so if there's enough interest in it, some financial sponsoring would be very helpful, though not required. Cool idea, Kieren! Where is this sample from? -Abraham Sent from my iPhone On Feb 8, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Conor Cook [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n171621...@n5.nabble.com wrote: It looks like an extremely neat handwritten score, but probably written on staves that were already set, space-wise. I wonder if it could be modified for the purposes of Lilypond, while retaining its distinct features. ~Conor -- Forwarded message -- From: Kieren MacMillan [hidden email] To: Urs Liska [hidden email], Abraham Lee [hidden email] Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List [hidden email] Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:25:13 -0500 Subject: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid) Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: [hidden email] -- Forwarded message -- From: Urs Liska [hidden email] To: Kieren MacMillan [hidden email], Abraham Lee [hidden email] Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List [hidden email] Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:43:37 +0100 Subject: Re: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid) Am 08.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Hm, I don't find this so awesome, tends to be not so readable ;-) And it seems to encourage making errors or mixing staves (e.g. writing articulations between staves without clear attribution ;-) Urs Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: [hidden email] ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-font-was-Re-Gridly-simple-Segmented-Grid-tp171621.html To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/new-font-was-Re-Gridly-simple-Segmented-Grid-tp171621p171623.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid)
It looks like an extremely neat handwritten score, but probably written on staves that were already set, space-wise. I wonder if it could be modified for the purposes of Lilypond, while retaining its distinct features. ~Conor -- Forwarded message -- From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca To: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org, Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:25:13 -0500 Subject: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid) Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info -- Forwarded message -- From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org To: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca, Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:43:37 +0100 Subject: Re: new font? (was Re: Gridly: simple Segmented Grid) Am 08.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: Hi Urs, I just pushed to github Gridly, a small LIlyPond library that (partly) implements the segmented grid approach described by Urs Liska in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/10/segment-grid/), including some of the ideas proposed by Jan-Peter Voigt in his blog post (http://lilypondblog.org/2014/07/trees-music-and-lilypond/) . On a related note, I found Abraham’s next awesome Lilypond font… ;) http://lilypondblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/sample-page.pdf Hm, I don't find this so awesome, tends to be not so readable ;-) And it seems to encourage making errors or mixing staves (e.g. writing articulations between staves without clear attribution ;-) Urs Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Fwd: RE: How to remove gap in UpPrall spanner?
Sorry,
Didn't reply to the list.
This is even better then perfection.
\version 2.17.9
beginPrallSpan =
\tweak bound-details.left.text
\markup { \fontsize #-5 { \musicglyph #accidentals.leftparen } }
\tweak bound-details.left.stencil-offset #'(0.02 . -0.65)
\tweak bound-details.left.padding #-0.25
\tweak bound-details.right.padding #-1
\startTrillSpan
endPrallSpan = \stopTrillSpan
{
c'\beginPrallSpan d' c'2\endPrallSpan
}
See the old thread.
Greetings, Ed
-- Doorgestuurd bericht --
Van: Ed Gordijn ed.klari...@gmail.com
Datum: 8 feb. 2015 09:42
Onderwerp: RE: How to remove gap in UpPrall spanner?
Aan: Javier Ruiz-Alma jav...@ruiz-alma.com
Cc:
If you like this,
PERFECTION
Take a look at this old thread.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-01/msg00167.html
Greetings, Ed
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with r2. in two voices
Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry: On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com mailto:pck...@mac.com wrote: But I don't want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice. That's why each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2. And why is it only rests and notes that have augmentation dots are affected in \oneVoice mode this way? There is no way other than clashing note column warnings to tell that two voices have each issued concurrent rests in \oneVoice mode. It's just kind of weird that augmentation dots get this special treatment. I think you are misusing \oneVoice here; Indeed the name of the command makes perfectly clear that it's contradictory and nonsensical (and lily basically requires to be given sensible input) to write \oneVoice and have two voices all the same. Too much noise for such a basic misconception! Yours, Simon it isn't for merging things into a single voice, but rather for telling LilyPond that there is only one voice that it needs to position on the staff. If you are still `feeding' it two (or more) voices you will have to do some extra work to tell LilyPond what to do or you will get errors and/or unintended output. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
EB Garamond font-series
Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/ https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip, but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solution? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
openlilylib and Makefiles
Hi List, Does anyone have experience with using both openlilylib and Makefiles? I'm using Urs' scholarLy, and have updated to the latest code as of yesterday, and through Frescobaldi it all engraves fine. However, when I try to run my Makefile on the same piece it gives me cannot find file: `openlilylib' Any ideas? Craig ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too sad :) -Abraham On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n171634...@n5.nabble.com wrote: On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/ https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip, but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solution? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Can you provide more details on how to test it? Can you see them using another program such as libereoffice writer. Does your system show them as imported? Last but not least which fonts did you install, the otf? -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user signature.asc (205 bytes) Download Attachment If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/EB-Garamond-font-series-tp171632p171634.html To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/EB-Garamond-font-series-tp171632p171635.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[OT] Vaughan is now composing…
http://xkcd.com/1482/ …it would be quite easy to implement in Frescobaldi or Lilypond! Vaughan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/ https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip, but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solution? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Can you provide more details on how to test it? Can you see them using another program such as libereoffice writer. Does your system show them as imported? Last but not least which fonts did you install, the otf? -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: openlilylib and Makefiles
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have experience with using both openlilylib and Makefiles? I'm using Urs' scholarLy, and have updated to the latest code as of yesterday, and through Frescobaldi it all engraves fine. However, when I try to run my Makefile on the same piece it gives me cannot find file: `openlilylib' Do you have the necessary folders in your include path in the makefile? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
On Sunday, February 08, 2015 09:16:40 PM tisimst wrote: No need to test that. There isn't a bold variant (yet), though it seems like the author hopes to get that far. Hope that doesn't make you too sad :) -Abraham On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Thomas Spuhler [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n171634...@n5.nabble.com wrote: On Monday, February 09, 2015 02:13:53 AM Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, I just re-installed the incredibly beautiful EB Garamond font from http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond/ https://bitbucket.org/georgd/eb-garamond/downloads/EBGaramond-0.016.zip, but apparently Lily can’t find the bold font series. Can anyone tell me where to search for a solution? Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Can you provide more details on how to test it? Can you see them using another program such as libereoffice writer. Does your system show them as imported? Last but not least which fonts did you install, the otf? -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/EB-Garamond-font-series-tp171632p171635.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Are you sure: see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 EBGaramond_08_20points_normal_bold.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler thomas.spuh...@btspuhler.com wrote: Are you sure: see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by modifying the regular (roman) face. I don't know if that is what happened in your attachment, but the zip archive for the EB Garamond font linked to in your first message does not contain any files for a bold face. Normally a typeface has separate files for regular, bold, italic, bold-italic and so on, which LilyPond will attempt to use, but in this case it can't because that file presumably doesn't exist on your system. Elsewhere on the website the author does mention bold in the list of goals, but it does not appear in the specimen pdf which suggests it is not implemented yet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: EB Garamond font-series
This is correct. LibreOffice does fake italic, bold, and bold-italic if that variant doesn't exist. LilyPond, however, makes no attempt at this and just reverts to the closest one that is installed, which is usually the regular variant. - Abraham Sent from my iPhone On Feb 8, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Kevin Barry [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n171638...@n5.nabble.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Thomas Spuhler [hidden email] wrote: Are you sure: see attachment from libreoffice writer, normal and bold When there is no bold face present, a word processor might `fake' one by modifying the regular (roman) face. I don't know if that is what happened in your attachment, but the zip archive for the EB Garamond font linked to in your first message does not contain any files for a bold face. Normally a typeface has separate files for regular, bold, italic, bold-italic and so on, which LilyPond will attempt to use, but in this case it can't because that file presumably doesn't exist on your system. Elsewhere on the website the author does mention bold in the list of goals, but it does not appear in the specimen pdf which suggests it is not implemented yet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/EB-Garamond-font-series-tp171632p171638.html To start a new topic under User, email ml-node+s1069038n...@n5.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here. NAML -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/EB-Garamond-font-series-tp171632p171639.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [OT] Vaughan is now composing…
Love this! Attach it to Frescobaldi's auto-compile so that it tweets and/or posts to my facebook wall every time. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OT-Vaughan-is-now-composing-tp171629p171630.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
