Linux-Networking Digest #935
Linux-Networking Digest #935, Volume #11 Sun, 18 Jul 99 23:13:31 EDT
Contents:
Re: Are NetGear cards supported under Linux? (Scott Prive)
Re: Dead daemons? (Frank v Waveren)
Ethernet card support for Compaq NetFlex-2 Enet/TR?? (ncannon)
Re: Squid + Junkbuster??? HELP!!! (Adrian Hands)
Re: Telnet problem (John Thompson)
SN-3200CT + linux = ?? ("Chad")
pppd message: Recieve serial link not clean ("Mark Bennett")
Re: kppp setup solution! (Christopher Chan)
Sendmail initialization is slow ("David A. Ferguson")
Re: PING in NT DOMAIN and LINUX ("Bwilkinson1")
Building a Digital modem box with Linux ? (David Nillesen)
1 way connection (Michael Adam Schulman)
TCP Error: No Route to Host (Kari Suomela)
can't get terminal parameters - not a typewriter ("Andre Konstantinov")
chat script problems ("Dean")
Re: ???:Odd Masqu "Problem"??? - Solved! (Douglas E. Mitton)
Re: Newbie Q: Getting message 'RPC program not registered ' when trying
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Apache :- CacheNegotiatedDocs (Ng Kiok Teck)
Re: Machine disappears till ping? (John Coppens)
Re: Auto check for email (Monte Milanuk)
From: Scott Prive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Are NetGear cards supported under Linux?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:33:27 -0400
I'd just like to add I got one of the NetGear PCI 10/100T cards for $29 at
CompUSA... a DEAL! I've dealt with their tech support and they are competent
as well (in my experience). Because it's MUCH cheaper than 3com or Intel and
has been reliable I've been recommending this card left and right.
The installation papers only mention "other OS's see text files on floppy",
and I overlooked this the first time. They include instructions as a
readme.txt, and even include their own tulip.c file for the kernel... but
you DON'T need this and it could be older than what's in the latest kernel.
The card works great under Linux (sorry I forget the model# of my card), but
if you dual-boot... under Windows 98 you MAY need to set the card to run
with the 16-bit driver. I was a little disappointed about that, especially
since the 32-bit Windows driver worked fine before I rebuilt the system (and
it was Linux/Win95). Oh well, card still works...
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes NetGear cards are supported. When you compile a kernel just choose
the Dec Tulip 21140. I have one in my Debian 2.1 system right now.
Dustin
John Hardin wrote:
Stephan wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have Debian 2.1 on which I'm going to be installing the 2.2.x
kernel. I just got a NetGear EA201C 10BT ISA Ethernet card. I just
checked the Ethernet howto, and I didn't see this manufacturer
listed. Is
it supported or should I return it? (On the box it says it can be
used on
SCO UNIX) If it is supported, what driver do I need and where do I
get it?
If you've opened the box, take a look at the numbers on the biggest
chip. They may appear in the Ethernet HOWTO or the Redhat Hardware
Compatibility List.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardinPGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
--
-
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight...
Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank v Waveren)
Subject: Re: Dead daemons?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 01:22:23 GMT
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R. Christopher Harshman wrote:
I've got a box that I administrate in California (this summer,
I'm in Missouri). It's running kernel 2.2.9 and Slackware 3.5
(heavily modified). I telnet in occasionally (once a day or
so) to make sure everything's more or less kosher, and logfiles
get rotated and emailed to me very night.
Telent in? So you user id and paddword can be sniffed by anyone?
Really, you shouldn't. You have SSH installed; use it.
A few days ago, the box wasn't responding to telnet or ftp
connections, but ping and apache were still working. I
figured inetd had somehow stopped responding, and remembered
that we had installed 'sshd' after the fact, and that it
was running from /etc/rc.d/rc.local, so I was able to get
in using secure shell. Sure enough, inetd was not listed
among the processes when I did a ps -aux. So, as root,
I fired it back up, and all was well.
Now, yesterday, the messages file that arrived in my inbox
was completely blank (unheard of, even in the summer; there
are always people POP'ing in to check mail, etc), so
I telnetted in to find syslogd not r
Linux-Networking Digest #935
Linux-Networking Digest #935, Volume #10 Wed, 21 Apr 99 22:13:40 EDT
Contents:
Restricting Internet Mail (MegaSurge)
Multi Linux 5.2 + 1 M$ Win 95 Lan (Scott Kilmurray)
Re: net modules ("Curt")
Re: QUESTION ? What are the IP bandwidth limitations of Linux ? (James Youngman)
Re: HDD Spindown - For a Year! (Herb Stein)
QUESTION ? What are the IP bandwidth limitations of Linux ? (me zawadzki)
Re: networking windows98 (Christian Armeanu)
ipfwadm question ("Sean S. Hardesty")
Re: QUESTION ? What are the IP bandwidth limitations of Linux ? ("Jan Johansson")
Re: tcpdump: socket: Socket type not supported (Clifford Kite)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Myke Olson)
Re: pppd stoped working when changed to 2.2.5 kernel pppd-2.3.5 (Clifford Kite)
Help setting up Samsung 10BaseT NICS please (Richard Boehme)
ftp: put does not work (Christoph Winkler)
Re: RealTek RTL 8029 PCI Ethernet Driver (Travis F Shugarts)
NON-BLOCKING SOCKETS... HOW TO?!?! (Fox Mulder)
Re: Why won't RedHat see my network card? ("Richard Miller")
ethertap for 2.0.36 ? (Frederic Rible)
Re: please help! apache problem with numeric IP. (Wendell Craig)
Re: P.S. Networking Windows98 to Linux Please Help (Sebastien Perreault)
Linux networked w/Win95 (Brian Witowski)
Re: internet locator server for linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: dhcp and windows 95 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
From: MegaSurge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Restricting Internet Mail
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11:57:04 -0700
This is just a simple theoretical question. Can I restrict access as to
who can send receive internet mail from an internal linux mail server?
i.e. I have 70 people on my network, of them only 30 need access to
internet email. All of them need access to local internal email. I want
to make it so the 40 people that don't need it aren't able to send or
receive internet email, while the others can and still allowing everyone
to check local mail.
Is this possible? If so, how might this be done?
"If there is a *quintessential zone of human privacy* it is the mind."
--
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 23:59:28 +0100
From: Scott Kilmurray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multi Linux 5.2 + 1 M$ Win 95 Lan
I have 3 Linux 5.2 boxes which consist of:
1 x server (STARFLEET_HQ) which runs samba and is a Win95 Domain
login box.
1 x server (PCLAPA) which runs samba, and controls access to a HP
OfficeJet for the domain (STARFLEET)
1 x server (Laptop_1) which is a mobile linux box, which I use both
at home and at Uni, with switched configurations.
1 x w/s (STARBASE_1) which is the M$ Win95 box. I would like to know if
it is possible for each of these machines to work together in a single
domain. I want to be able to rsh into each of the linux boxes from the
server and run remote progs (in parallel) for a Uni assignment, but when
I try all I get is Permission Denied. Each machine has the sames users:
root, scott each user has the same password.
Please help.
Yours
Scott Kilmurray
--
From: "Curt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net modules
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 03:22:36 -0500
Add this to /etc/conf.modules
alias net-pf-4 off # Forget IPX
alias net-pf-5 off # Forget AppleTalk
Chris Carter wrote in message 7f6lhe$ppv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If someone has any suggestions I would be appreciative...
Here is my system:
Redhat 5.2
2.0.36 kernel
3com 3c509 ISA NIC
ip forwarding enabled
all ip masq options enabled in kernel
Everything network-wise works fine (ftp, samba, httpd)and there are no
error messages in the boot.log except for the following:
cant find module net-pf-4
cant find module net-pf-5
It displays this message several times throughout the boot and shutdown
process. I have checked the modules.dep file and all the modules that are
in that file are also in their correct directories. Is there another module
config file I am missing? Does the 4 and 5 refer to a line in modules.dep?
Thanks for your time...
Chris
-- Posted via SearchLinux --
http://www.searchlinux.com
--
From: James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QUESTION ? What are the IP bandwidth limitations of Linux ?
Date: 20 Apr 1999 21:02:08 +0100
me zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We currently have a number of client systems running NT. These systems
need to be able to receive (MPEG) files, via a WAN, at very high rates.
These systems are unable to receive at rates above ~ 2Mbits/second. Our
NT expert [it's a love/hate relationship :-)] says that this is due
to protocol stack limitations. The machines are all Pentium, 200 MHz,
10BaseT.
I currently have a proposal on the table, which is to replace these
NT (P)OS * boxes with Linux. Our f
Linux-Networking Digest #935
Linux-Networking Digest #935, Volume #9 Tue, 19 Jan 99 08:14:15 EST
Contents:
Errors compiling portmap - please help (Vincent Stemen)
Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ? (e-account)
Linux networking weirdness ? daemons rejecting ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Samba Troubles (Benjohn007)
Re: linux time configuration (Peter Farmer)
Re: lpd won't accept print jobs from other machines (Scott Field)
Re: ppp numbering--control? (Brian McCauley)
Re: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ? (Lei Miao)
smbmount seg faults on RH 5.2 (Ole Jacob Taraldset)
Can I force a route? (Jonathan Johnson)
Re: How to set up a DNS ?? (Omegaman)
Re: OH My God (Omegaman)
Re: ip masquerading and icq ("Rogers News")
Re: begginer need help please (Marius Bezuidenhout)
Re: ½Ð°ÝRH5.2¤ä´©þ¨Ç¼tµPªºNetwork card? ("Darryl Burling")
Re: database suggestions, please? ("Glenn Davy")
Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (John Girash)
From: Vincent Stemen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Errors compiling portmap - please help
Date: 18 Jan 1999 00:59:57 -0700
Is there anybody here who has had experience compiling portmap under
Linux? I have tried compiling portmap_4 and portmap_5beta and get
similar results. Here is the output of make for portmap_5beta.
===
cc -Dconst= -Dperror=xperror -DHOSTS_ACCESS -DCHECK_PORT -DFACILITY=LOG_MAIL o
portmap.c: In function `xperror':
portmap.c:299: argument `what' doesn't match prototype
/usr/include/stdio.h:134: prototype declaration
portmap.c: In function `reg_service':
portmap.c:353: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:362: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:362: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:404: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:416: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:416: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:450: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:462: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:462: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:477: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:489: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:501: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c: In function `callit':
portmap.c:648: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:648: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:678: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:678: warning: passing arg 5 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:679: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
make: *** [portmap.o] Error 1
===
I am running
kernel 2.0.35
libc-5.4.23
gcc-2.7.2.3
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks.
--
---
Vincent Stemen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try Linux! The operating system of choice for those who are tired of
trying to perform real tasks with toy operating systems,
or operating systems that have been stripped of
functionality just so they can charge you to put it back
in.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:39:12 GMT
Hi,
Thorsten, I forgot to add that the netgroups we work with
are very large, we have hierarchical netgroups, of 17,000 users.
--Ariel
P.S. Nevertheless, it works fine on Solaris, Irix, NetApp filer.
= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
From: e-account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.questions
Subject: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:07:37 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==AEE7E47C8E928F0918BC0A57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
Is it possible to run both smtp and pop3 servers on the same machine?
If so, are they able to transfer mail from the one to the other?
We seem to have some problem to implement it.
Feel free to comment.
Thanks
==AEE7E47C8E928F0918BC0A57
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="e-account.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for e-account
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="e-account.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Cant;Bart
tel;home:+32 16 23.71.56
tel;work:+32 2 714.45.63
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.ficsgrp.com
org:FICS Group NV
adr:;;Excelsiorlaan 80
