Vet software

2002-05-22 Thread Ted Ozolins

Awhile back someone was looking for a Vet office package. I'm not sure if you 
found one but check out VetTux (freshmeat)
-- 
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, B. C.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Wednesday 15 May 2002 14:43, dep wrote:
 first -- jeez! there's a multitude of ideas here, all of them good. i
 still wonder what it would take to adapt what we already have from
 2.4, how copying the whole cd to a directory, updating the rpms
 (which, okay, would be a hell of a job), burning it back to cd, and
 running it, could be made to work.

Ok! I at least have the time to play with this but need a great deal more 
info, where do I go for this?
I have on original disk the eDesktop but not the original std 2.4, has anyone 
got this still and can I get a copy? I do have LTP still.

Also I have Suse 8.0 and , _CANNOT_ get the dvd drive to be seen as ide-scsi
tried practically everything to no avail, assist please. As most know I wrote 
the original SxS on this but Suse is a 'Bast***'. I even got it seen in 
Mandrake's latest but not this one. Oh, yes! it sees the writer ok. Umm I 
seem to have killed sr1, whats the call for remaking that, but it says that 
scd1 and sr2 do not exist but they do in /dev.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Killed message log!!!

2002-05-22 Thread Kurt Wall

Scribbling feverishly on May 21, Harry G managed to emit:
 In my attempt to find the trouble with cdrecord, I meant to copy my 
 /var/log/messages doc.  Instead, due to the hour, I renamed it.
 
 I successfully renamed it back, but now, there is no logging report 
 being generated in the message file.  
 
 What can I do to fix this stupid thing I did?

Restart syslog.

Kurt
-- 
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



GRUB LILO

2002-05-22 Thread Brian Witowski

How would I go about removing LILO from a HD and replacing it with GRUB?
There is only one OS on the machine, if that matters.

Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Killed message log!!! SOLVED

2002-05-22 Thread Harry G

Thank you.  Boy, I sure feel dumb!

Harry G

On Wednesday May 22 2002 05:34 am, you interfaced in analog form:
 Scribbling feverishly on May 21, Harry G managed to emit:
  In my attempt to find the trouble with cdrecord, I meant to copy my
  /var/log/messages doc.  Instead, due to the hour, I renamed it.
 
  I successfully renamed it back, but now, there is no logging report
  being generated in the message file.
 
  What can I do to fix this stupid thing I did?

 Restart syslog.

 Kurt
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Richard R. Sivernell

Skippy

   do you need the original ed 2.4 cd ? I have a one copy here and there
are several in a store thelast time I looked. I can burn a copy if you need it.

cheers

-- 
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas  75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered Linux User

   .~.
  / v \
 /( _ )\
   ^ ^
In Linux we trust!
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: OT Maybe

2002-05-22 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 21 May 2002 23:21:35 +
begin  Ronnie Gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

 OK, then how about the open p tags.
 

??? There's no open p tags in the linuxbooks.pananix.com/basic/toc.html 

This is a whole separate tree from my pananix site.

-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Gcmbust as non-root

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Wunder

OK gcombust lovers, how do I get the damn program to work as non-root?
This is a permissions issue that seems to be escaping me.

My symptoms are as follows:
I start gcombust and go to the Burn tab, then click the Check scsi settings button. 
I am then presented with  an error message,
cdrecord failed to recognize selected drive (wrong scsi settings or no permission to 
device)


/dev/scd0 is my reader (it's a CDRW, but it don't write too good anymore)
/dec/scd1 is my CDRW - Liteon 241016

Permissions are (now) as follows:
brwxrwxrwx 2 root root   11,   0  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd0
brwxrwxrwx 2 root root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1

Last night when I was trying this, permissions on /dev/scd1 were
brwx-- 2 dad  root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
and I changed it to 
brwxrwxrwx 2 dad  root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
with no change to the behavior of gcombust

This morning, permissions on /dev/scd1 were (before I changed them to the previously 
mentioned perm's)
brwx-- 2 root root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
I don't know how this got changed from last nights settings.

Permissions on /dev/scd0 don't seem to change. When I click the Check scsi settings 
button while /dev/scd0 is selected as my reader, I get the same error message.

It works fine as root ('cept I don't want to have to run the proggy as root).
Any ideas?
At this point, I'm back to using xcdroast :-(

Thanks, 
Tim



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: GRUB LILO

2002-05-22 Thread Collins

On Wed, 22 May 2002 07:16:58 -0400 Brian Witowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How would I go about removing LILO from a HD and replacing it with
 GRUB? There is only one OS on the machine, if that matters.
 

1. make sure you have a lilo boot disk, and verify that it works
2. Install grub software (rpm, tarballs, your choice)
3. Read the 'info grub' files.  You could also setup a grub boot
floppy.  This is covered in the info files.
4. Now you should create /boot/grub directory and copy all grub
*stage* files to that directory.
5. create /boot/grub/menu.lst.  Here's a sample

default 0
timeout 10
title=Gentoo-19-r5-hda2
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/bzImage-2.4.19-gentoo-r5 root=/dev/hda2 hdc=ide-scsi
hdd=ide-scsi ro
title=elx17-hda6
root (hd0,5)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.17 root=/dev/hda6 hdc=ide-scsi ro
title=Win98
root (hd0,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1

6. In the following root is the address of the partition with
/boot/grub partition in grub terminology, i.e. hda2 = hd0,1
root (hd0,1)
setup (hd0)
5. Reboot and enjoy


-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Gcmbust as non-root

2002-05-22 Thread Roger Oberholtzer

Since xcdroast works, I would imagine that cdrecord itself has proper
permissions. Still, I have to ask...

Mine are:

  -r-sr-sr-x  1 root  root 185948 Dec 13 13:55 /usr/bin/cdrecord

I had to do a 'chmod +s' myself. I don't care what the packages claim.
It don't work for me without this.

What does 'cdrecord --scanbus' return when run as a non-root user?

-- 
++===+
| Roger Oberholtzer  |   E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| OPQ Systems AB |  WWW:  http://www.opq.se/ |
| Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43  |Phone: Int + 46 8   314223 |
| 115 32 Stockholm   |   Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 |
| Sweden |  Fax: Int + 46 8   302602 |
++===+

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Leon A. Goldstein

Skippy (Keith Antoine) wrote inter alia:

 Also I have Suse 8.0 and , _CANNOT_ get the dvd drive to be seen as ide-scsi
 tried practically everything to no avail, assist please. As most know I wrote
 the original SxS on this but Suse is a 'Bast***'. I even got it seen in
 Mandrake's latest but not this one. Oh, yes! it sees the writer ok. Umm I
 seem to have killed sr1, whats the call for remaking that, but it says that
 scd1 and sr2 do not exist but they do in /dev.


I am interested in the answer too.  At the risk of starting a small bush
fire, I'd suggest cease flagellating yourself
with SuSE and try a nice Debian like Libranet.

Case in point: I dloaded xcdroast alpha 10 and ancillary libs for SuSE
8.0.  They installed OK, but even with the
no-root option selected SuSE 8.0 refuses to let me run xcdroast in
user.

I then dloaded alpha 10 and ancillary libs from Debian.org and installed
it in Libranet 2.0.2.  It works fine.
And it recognizes my DVD as a SCSI device.

--
Leon A. Goldstein

Powered by Libranet 1.9.1 Debian Linux
System 5151

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Tony Alfrey

Hi gang!

Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
Thanks

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread stayler

On Wed, 22 May 2002 06:18:54 -0700, Tony Alfrey wrote:

Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
Thanks

Not really...  I had better luck with Slackware 8.0

YMMV

Stayler

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Gcmbust as non-root

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Wunder

On 5/22/2002 9:13 AM, someone claiming to be Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
 Since xcdroast works, I would imagine that cdrecord itself has proper
 permissions. Still, I have to ask...
 
 Mine are:
 
   -r-sr-sr-x  1 root  root 185948 Dec 13 13:55 /usr/bin/cdrecord
 

-rws--x---   1  root  xcdwrite  265232 Apr 29 22:50 /usr/local/bin/cdrecord

 I had to do a 'chmod +s' myself. I don't care what the packages claim.
 It don't work for me without this.
 

I'm a member of the xcdrwite group, sufficient for executing cdrecord with the perm's 
it has.

 What does 'cdrecord --scanbus' return when run as a non-root user?
 

The right stuff (I'm not in position to copy and paste the output). 

Thanks, 
Tim



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: OT Maybe

2002-05-22 Thread David A. Bandel

On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:29:50 -0400
begin  Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

 On 5/21/2002 6:45 AM, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote:
  On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:50:23 +0200 begin  Roger Oberholtzer
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
  
  
  Will there be a section on this in the book?
  

All the code is now fixed (even the code that wasn't broken, but the
validator didn't like).
FYI, the fix for the CSS link (I'm waiting for the validator author to
explain to me why my code was wrong) is:

link rel=stylesheet type=text/css
href=http://www.pananix.com/css/pananix.css; /
LINK REL=STYLESHEET HREF=http://www.pananix.com/css/pananix.css;
TYPE=text/css

(note: line wrap, no extra charge)

I _still_ see no difference with the version of Konqueror I have.

So I'll focus on code rather than the book.

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Gcmbust as non-root

2002-05-22 Thread Susan Macchia

I always run it as root because I really don't care to worry about running it
as me.  So I simply set up an icon that uses kdesu.  Then when I click the
icon, I enter the root password and gcombust comes up and I cna burn with no
problemo.

I could never get xcdroast to work.  (or kconcd either).  Since gcombust works
and is so configurable, I have stuck with it.


Tim Wunder wrote:

 OK gcombust lovers, how do I get the damn program to work as non-root?
 This is a permissions issue that seems to be escaping me.
 
 My symptoms are as follows:
 I start gcombust and go to the Burn tab, then click the Check scsi settings

 button. I am then presented with  an error message,
 cdrecord failed to recognize selected drive (wrong scsi settings or no 
 permission to device)
 
 
 /dev/scd0 is my reader (it's a CDRW, but it don't write too good anymore)
 /dec/scd1 is my CDRW - Liteon 241016
 
 Permissions are (now) as follows:
 brwxrwxrwx 2 root root   11,   0  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd0
 brwxrwxrwx 2 root root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
 
 Last night when I was trying this, permissions on /dev/scd1 were
 brwx-- 2 dad  root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
 and I changed it to 
 brwxrwxrwx 2 dad  root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
 with no change to the behavior of gcombust
 
 This morning, permissions on /dev/scd1 were (before I changed them to the 
 previously mentioned perm's)
 brwx-- 2 root root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
 I don't know how this got changed from last nights settings.
 
 Permissions on /dev/scd0 don't seem to change. When I click the Check scsi 
 settings button while /dev/scd0 is selected as my reader, I get the same
error 
 message.
 
 It works fine as root ('cept I don't want to have to run the proggy as root).
 Any ideas?
 At this point, I'm back to using xcdroast :-(
 
 Thanks, 
 Tim
 

=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Gcmbust as non-root

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Truth be told, i've always run it as root too.  I dont' see what the big
deal is.  If you're going to directly access the hardware, its prolly
better that root do it anyway.  Or go with sudo.

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Susan Macchia wrote:

 I always run it as root because I really don't care to worry about running it
 as me.  So I simply set up an icon that uses kdesu.  Then when I click the
 icon, I enter the root password and gcombust comes up and I cna burn with no
 problemo.

 I could never get xcdroast to work.  (or kconcd either).  Since gcombust works
 and is so configurable, I have stuck with it.


 Tim Wunder wrote:

  OK gcombust lovers, how do I get the damn program to work as non-root?
  This is a permissions issue that seems to be escaping me.
 
  My symptoms are as follows:
  I start gcombust and go to the Burn tab, then click the Check scsi settings

  button. I am then presented with  an error message,
  cdrecord failed to recognize selected drive (wrong scsi settings or no
  permission to device)
 
 
  /dev/scd0 is my reader (it's a CDRW, but it don't write too good anymore)
  /dec/scd1 is my CDRW - Liteon 241016
 
  Permissions are (now) as follows:
  brwxrwxrwx 2 root root   11,   0  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd0
  brwxrwxrwx 2 root root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
 
  Last night when I was trying this, permissions on /dev/scd1 were
  brwx-- 2 dad  root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
  and I changed it to
  brwxrwxrwx 2 dad  root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
  with no change to the behavior of gcombust
 
  This morning, permissions on /dev/scd1 were (before I changed them to the
  previously mentioned perm's)
  brwx-- 2 root root   11,   1  Feb 23 22:10 /dev/scd1
  I don't know how this got changed from last nights settings.
 
  Permissions on /dev/scd0 don't seem to change. When I click the Check scsi
  settings button while /dev/scd0 is selected as my reader, I get the same
 error
  message.
 
  It works fine as root ('cept I don't want to have to run the proggy as root).
  Any ideas?
  At this point, I'm back to using xcdroast :-(
 
  Thanks,
  Tim


 =
 _
 Susan Macchia
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _

 - Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
 http://launch.yahoo.com
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.


-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: OT Maybe

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Wunder

On 5/22/2002 9:44 AM, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote:
 On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:29:50 -0400
 begin  Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
 
On 5/21/2002 6:45 AM, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote:

On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:50:23 +0200 begin  Roger Oberholtzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:



Will there be a section on this in the book?

 
 All the code is now fixed (even the code that wasn't broken, but the
 validator didn't like).
 FYI, the fix for the CSS link (I'm waiting for the validator author to
 explain to me why my code was wrong) is:
 
 link rel=stylesheet type=text/css
 href=http://www.pananix.com/css/pananix.css; /
 LINK REL=STYLESHEET HREF=http://www.pananix.com/css/pananix.css;
 TYPE=text/css
 
 (note: line wrap, no extra charge)
 
 I _still_ see no difference with the version of Konqueror I have.
 

Which version of Konqueror would that be? Were you seeing the same problem I was 
(konqueror-2.x had black text/white background/scroll bar, konqueror-3.x had blue 
text/yellow background/no scroll bar)?

 So I'll focus on code rather than the book.

I thought you were focusing on the dream ;-)

Tim



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: OT Maybe

2002-05-22 Thread David A. Bandel

On Wed, 22 May 2002 10:19:43 -0400
begin  Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:

[snip]

 
 Which version of Konqueror would that be? Were you seeing the same
 problem I was (konqueror-2.x had black text/white background/scroll bar,
 konqueror-3.x had blue text/yellow background/no scroll bar)?

I don't know, I don't usually use it.  Which version comes with Caldera
Workstation 3.1.1? I use Netscape 6.2 for browsing (or lynx, which seems
to work well with CSS).

 
  So I'll focus on code rather than the book.
 
 I thought you were focusing on the dream ;-)

The book was the dream.  You've changed my focus by nitpicking.

All I really wanted to do was write and explain.  Now I'm having to code
html (and I don't like it or I'd be a Web Master -- partly why I'm using
CSS, class=xxx is a helluva lot easier than all the other markups).

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



FreeSCO vs. SmoothWall

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

I'm in the process of setting up a firewall/router box, and i've reduced
my choices to Freesco  Smoothwall.  I'd like some input from anyone who
has used them on pro's  cons.


thanks!

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: GRUB LILO

2002-05-22 Thread Brian Witowski

Went off without a hitch.  Thanks all!

Brian

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Collins
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:41 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: GRUB  LILO
 
 
 On Wed, 22 May 2002 07:16:58 -0400 Brian Witowski
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  How would I go about removing LILO from a HD and replacing it with
  GRUB? There is only one OS on the machine, if that matters.
  
 
 1. make sure you have a lilo boot disk, and verify that it works
 2. Install grub software (rpm, tarballs, your choice)
 3. Read the 'info grub' files.  You could also setup a grub boot
 floppy.  This is covered in the info files.
 4. Now you should create /boot/grub directory and copy all grub
 *stage* files to that directory.
 5. create /boot/grub/menu.lst.  Here's a sample
 
 default 0
 timeout 10
 title=Gentoo-19-r5-hda2
 root (hd0,1)
 kernel /boot/bzImage-2.4.19-gentoo-r5 root=/dev/hda2 hdc=ide-scsi
 hdd=ide-scsi ro
 title=elx17-hda6
 root (hd0,5)
 kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.17 root=/dev/hda6 hdc=ide-scsi ro
 title=Win98
 root (hd0,0)
 makeactive
 chainloader +1
 
 6. In the following root is the address of the partition with
 /boot/grub partition in grub terminology, i.e. hda2 = hd0,1
   root (hd0,1)
   setup (hd0)
 5. Reboot and enjoy
 
 
 -- 
 Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
 gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla
 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Linux Journal Weekly News Notes -- May 22nd

2002-05-22 Thread Federico Voges

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Enjoy...

  Linux Journal Weekly News Notes -- May 22nd
 _

  Feature Links of the Week

   Amateur Video Production Using Free Software and Linux:
   http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5817 -- Mike Petullo
gives
   us this HOWTO for digitizing analog videos for storage and
   manipulation, including tools for editing and ways to publish
digital
   videos.

   802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide:
   http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6089 -- The book claims
to
   be definitive, so Monta Elkins gave it a thorough review. His
   decision? Although it leaves out some key points, this is just the
   book I wished for while thumping my forehead against the wall trying
   to inject the same material directly from the IEEE 802.11 docs.
 _



Federico Voges
Socio gerente

Intrasoft
Malabia 2137 14 A
(1425) Buenos Aires
Argentina

Te/Fax: 54-11-4833-5182
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.intrasoft.com.ar

PGP Public Key Fingerprint: A536 4595 EB6F D197  FBC1 5C3A 145C 2516

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its 
affiliated companies.

iQA/AwUBPOvJ1hRcJRaVKt4XEQLVcgCgmqZkmWrFT9hY06FEZ0JFyLlrbeYAn0Rt
8a7Ttr8pqqvcrTSGyw3yiAIi
=o62F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re:FreeSCO vs. SmoothWall

2002-05-22 Thread Ben Duncan

For small Internal network accessing the Internet, I prefer FreeSco, 
thought I have not used SmoothWall.

Freesco I put On a 200MB Disk  P150Mhz with 32MB Ram and works great.
It installs on the disk as yea-old Dos Fat ...


-- 
Ben Duncan   Phone (601)-355-2574 Fax (601)-355-2573   Cell (601)-922-1220
 Business Network Solutions
  336 Elton Road  Jackson MS, 39212
Software is like Sex, it is better when it's free - Linus Torvalds

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Installation Guide for OO

2002-05-22 Thread Matthew Carpenter

On Tue, 07 May 2002 07:56:18 -0600
BOF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I believe that in order to use this, you have to have Open Office 
 installed as it is in an open office file format.
ROFL
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: CheckPoint Firewall.

2002-05-22 Thread Matthew Carpenter

My input is about CheckPoint FireWall-1 in general.  I have only run
CheckPoint on Solaris and Nokia's, but what I can tell you is still valid
for consideration:

Their product is a good product.  Very powerful and fairly easy to use
Their included management GUI is only for Windows.  An X-GUI was available
but cost extra.
Their support has sucked hard in the recent past, especially if you're not
in a major metropolis.  Perhaps this have gotten better in the last
6-8months, I know they were trying.
Their GUI is very easy to use... but maintenance takes a bit of thought...
 ie. you can get rulesets working quickly and easily but keeping the
ruleset maintainable is difficult because of the ease-of-use:  Groups can
be created within Groups, etc...  This causes issues in figuring out what
is REALLY there, and can add a lot of load to the boxes.  You have to be
dilligent in policy as to how groups can be used (eg. stating that groups
cannot be created within groups, each rule has it's own groups which have
devices and networks only, or whatever)
The Log-viewer sucks if you have several very active firewalls.  It can
take forever to show you anything.

Other than that, I liked their stuff.  I'd prefer Linux 2.4 NetFilter
personally, because you can set it up to be very easy to read and modify,
but it's lower-level.  GUI stuff can get out of hand too easily and allow
people to make changes that shouldn't be...  But that's just me.  OTOH,
the GUI is a nice front-end for those who fear scripts and CLI.


On Thu, 02 May 2002 17:40:32 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Does anyone have an opinion on CheckPoint Software's CHECKPOINT FIREWALL
 on linux?
 
 I'm interested in your opinions and perhaps better suggestions than
 checkpoint's offering.
 
 Thank you, in advance.
 
 -- 
 
 ***
 *** Registered Linux User Number 185956
   http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux
  5:37pm  up 50 days, 22:52,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.12, 0.17
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
 above URL.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: FreeSCO vs. SmoothWall

2002-05-22 Thread Matthew Carpenter

Things I like to look for in Firewall solutions:  Are they connection
tracking (ie. do they use Linux 2.4 kernel)?  Smoothwall DID NOT last I
knew.  I don't know anything about Freesco.

On Wed, 22 May 2002 12:00:28 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 5/22/2002 10:50 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
  I'm in the process of setting up a firewall/router box, and i've
  reduced my choices to Freesco  Smoothwall.  I'd like some input from
  anyone who has used them on pro's  cons.
  
  
  thanks!
  
 
 Freesco was a piece of cake to set up to use my cable modem. If you want
 to export some services, port forwarding is easy enough. It just plain
 runs. It painlessly handled Comcast's migration from the @home service
 to their own comcast.net service. Gets my IP via DHCP. I've got it
 running on a P100 with 32 MB Ram, 2 NICs and a floppy. No hd required.
 
 Haven't tried Smoothwall.
 
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
 above URL.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:17, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:

 I am interested in the answer too.  At the risk of starting a small bush
 fire, I'd suggest cease flagellating yourself
 with SuSE and try a nice Debian like Libranet.

The point here is that I dislike almost as much as I do Suse/Mandrake, its 
still in the last century. The only distro I had great sucess with was 
Caldera, I even liked LTP, I could and did work with them, hence my interest 
in dep's suggestion.

 Case in point: I dloaded xcdroast alpha 10 and ancillary libs for SuSE
 8.0.  They installed OK, but even with the
 no-root option selected SuSE 8.0 refuses to let me run xcdroast in
 user.

Now this is a point where I had complete success, always have with xcdroast, 
where others have not. I have Xcdroast working fine as a user but not 
recognising the reader. On the otherhand Koncd does see a reader ?? BUT!  go 
into root and set it up, bingo it crashes.

 I then dloaded alpha 10 and ancillary libs from Debian.org and installed
 it in Libranet 2.0.2.  It works fine.
 And it recognizes my DVD as a SCSI device.

There are other points with the suse/mandrake too in that I have graet 
difficulty with video streaming progs. I need a combination of programs some 
work fine in Suse and not in mandrake or vice versa.

I retried Caldera recently as 3.1.1 and most of the programs installed fine 
and dvd was recognised. Updating however was a nightmare and no interest from 
the company.

As I said to dep a while ago it like Sir Lancelot and the Holy Grail, 
searching for the; what I call perfect distro for me, the others all want to 
foist on me a set of rules and assumptions.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:18, Tony Alfrey wrote:
 Hi gang!

 Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
 In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
 Thanks

Geez, Tony where yer bin mate. Both of us over the years have 'talked' and I 
guess i know a few things that you require, 3.1.1 is not one of them. Unless 
you like being frustrated at not being able to update easily. They went 
backwards and still are going that way since 2.4.. The door 
is that way, Sir grin

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Bill Campbell

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:23:29AM +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
...
Memory on my part is one of my downfalls. However was there not a release 
before the eDesktop 2.4 that was just a plain Caldera 2.4 ? Was this not the 
best release of all, or am I getting mixed up again. If so I do have the eD 
2.4. At what stage was the LTP release I had success with,  after Ed2.4 or 
before, i.e after 2.4 and prior to 3.0.

The release order of the 2+ versions we've used as I remember it was:

OpenLinux 2.2   # we skipped this one -- rushed to make the first LinuxWorld
OpenLinux 2.3
eServer 2.3 # last to use LILO
eDesktop 2.4# first to use GRUB
OpenLinux 3.1 Workstation and Server
OpenLinux 3.1.1 Workstation and Server
freebsd 4.5 (whoops not Caldera, but perhaps where I'm headed as
it installs easily without graphics, and does all the
server things I need :-).

Bill
--
INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:   camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:(206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

``We maintain that the very foundation of our way of life is what we call
free enterprise,'' said Cash McCall, but when one of our citizens
show enough free enterprise to pile up a little of that profit, we do
our best to make him feel that he ought to be ashamed of himself.
-- Cameron Hawley
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Jim Conner

IIRC, Caldera released them in this order.

Desktop
--
OpenLinux 2.3
eDesktop 2.4
Linux Technology Preview(LTP)
W3.1
W3.1.1

Server
-
eServer 2.3
eServer 2.3.1 (had some updates and patches)
S3.1
S3.1.1

I'm not sure what was released by Caldera prior to that because I've only 
been using Caldera for a little over 2 years.  I agree that eD2.4 was a very 
stable and updatable distro.  As far as W3.x is concerned, I'm not very happy 
with it.  It works, but I'd like to have some of the latest libs to run 3D 
games.  These have to be installed and/or updated by tarballs.  I'd also like 
to try out KDE3(KDE3.0.1 has just been released today).  Caldera used to make 
rpms for each stable(and some beta) releases of KDE.  The last rpm package 
made by Caldera for KDE was KDE2.2.1.  Granted, I could compile KDE  QT from 
tarballs, but have you ever done this on a P200mmx with 64MB of ram?  I don't 
have time to do this and after it's done to find I didn't do it 
right(Murphy's Law) and have to do it again.  Well, I hope that either 
Caldera changes, or I'm going to have to change.  I'd like to see this 
project succeed, but ongoing package updates are crucial to the life of a 
distro.

Jim

On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:23, Keith Antoine wrote:
snip
 Memory on my part is one of my downfalls. However was there not a release
 before the eDesktop 2.4 that was just a plain Caldera 2.4 ? Was this not
 the best release of all, or am I getting mixed up again. If so I do have
 the eD 2.4. At what stage was the LTP release I had success with,  after
 Ed2.4 or before, i.e after 2.4 and prior to 3.0.

-- 
 
  3:42pm  up 16 days,  5:03,  3 users,  load average: 0.16, 0.03, 0.02

Running Caldera W3.1 - Linux - because life is too short for reboots...
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Tony Alfrey

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:23 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
 On Wednesday 22 May 2002 08:47, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
  Skippy
 
 do you need the original ed 2.4 cd ? I have a one copy here and
  there are several in a store thelast time I looked. I can burn a
  copy if you need it.
 
  cheers

 Memory on my part is one of my downfalls. However was there not a
 release before the eDesktop 2.4 that was just a plain Caldera 2.4 ?
 Was this not the best release of all, or am I getting mixed up again.
 If so I do have the eD 2.4. At what stage was the LTP release I had
 success with,  after Ed2.4 or before, i.e after 2.4 and prior to 3.0.

Hey SkippyDude;  too much time in the sun for you ;-)
eD 2.4 = Caldera 2.4 = COL2.4
LTP = just after 2.4;  I'm still running this with lots of upgrades.  
This is why I asked dep about wasn't 3.1 supposed to be 2.4 with all 
the stuff improved.

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: KDE 3.0.1 is out

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Does it still suck? ;)

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 on some of the mirrors... snarfing it now ;)

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Stuart Biggerstaff

At 01:47 PM 5/22/02 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
The release order of the 2+ versions we've used as I remember it was:

OpenLinux 2.2   # we skipped this one -- rushed to make the first LinuxWorld
OpenLinux 2.3
eServer 2.3 # last to use LILO
eDesktop 2.4# first to use GRUB

...also when they replaced KPPP with KsaferPPP, as I recall?  And it was 
between 2.x and 3.x they brought out LTP.  With that, I wonder if the 
perfect distro people are remembering isn't kind of a combination of 2.3, 
2.4 and LTP, as some started losing patience with Caldera at 2.4, while 
others held on till the 3.1 controversy.

OpenLinux 3.1 Workstation and Server
OpenLinux 3.1.1 Workstation and Server
freebsd 4.5 (whoops not Caldera, but perhaps where I'm headed as
 it installs easily without graphics, and does all the
 server things I need :-).

Bill



Stuart Biggerstaff

Linda Hall Library of Science Engineering  Technology
5109 Cherry St.
Kansas City, MO 64110

Phone:  (816) 926-8748
 (800) 662-1545 x748
FAX:(816) 926-8785
URL:www.lindahall.org

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: OT Maybe

2002-05-22 Thread Richard R. Sivernell

On Wed, 22 May 2002 07:20:51 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 21 May 2002 23:21:35 +
 begin  Ronnie Gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
 
  OK, then how about the open p tags.
  
 
 ??? There's no open p tags in the linuxbooks.pananix.com/basic/toc.html 
 
 This is a whole separate tree from my pananix site.
 
 -- 
 Focus on the dream, not the competition.
   -- Nemesis Racing Team motto
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
David

 Have you looked at Quanta plus.

cheers

-- 
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas  75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered Linux User

   .~.
  / v \
 /( _ )\
   ^ ^
In Linux we trust!
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Kurt Wall

Scribbling feverishly on May 22, Stuart Biggerstaff managed to emit:
 At 01:47 PM 5/22/02 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
 The release order of the 2+ versions we've used as I remember it was:
 
 OpenLinux 2.2   # we skipped this one -- rushed to make the first LinuxWorld
 OpenLinux 2.3
 eServer 2.3 # last to use LILO
 eDesktop 2.4# first to use GRUB
 
 ...also when they replaced KPPP with KsaferPPP, as I recall?  And it was 
 between 2.x and 3.x they brought out LTP.  With that, I wonder if the 
 perfect distro people are remembering isn't kind of a combination of 2.3, 
 2.4 and LTP, as some started losing patience with Caldera at 2.4, while 
 others held on till the 3.1 controversy.

Of all the releases, I preferred eDesktop 2.4 the most.

Kurt
-- 
The years of peak mental activity are undoubtedly between the ages of
four and eighteen.  At four we know all the questions, at eighteen all
the answers.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Installation Guide for OO

2002-05-22 Thread Brett I. Holcomb

And what if OOo won't open it G - which it didn't!
Matthew Carpenter wrote:

 On Tue, 07 May 2002 07:56:18 -0600
 BOF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I believe that in order to use this, you have to have Open Office
 installed as it is in an open office file format.
 ROFL

-- 
Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AKA Grunt 
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: KDE 3.0.1 is out

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Wunder

Been running it for a week ;-)

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 05:49 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 on some of the mirrors... snarfing it now ;)
 
-- 
Caldera eWorkstation 3.1+, kernel 2.4.18-preempt, KDE 3.0.1, Xfree86 4.1.0
  4:00pm  up 1 day, 20:23,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Jerry McBride

On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:50:14 -0700 Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:43 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:18, Tony Alfrey wrote:
   Hi gang!
  
   Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
   In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
   Thanks
 
  Geez, Tony where yer bin mate. Both of us over the years have
  'talked' and I guess i know a few things that you require, 3.1.1 is
  not one of them. Unless you like being frustrated at not being able
  to update easily. They went backwards and still are going that way
  since 2.4.. The door is that way, Sir grin
 
 Geeze Looeeze Skipmeister, whadda ya tryin' t do t me??  Everybody's 
 got me enthused about 3.1.1 and now you tell me it is bad news???
 What do you mean that it won't update??  Inquiring minds want to know.
 

In the big picture, WS 3.1.1 is a really nice distribtuion. However, it's
already getting to feel dated. If you really
gotta' have a nice, up-to-date, user friendly distro... go SUSE 8.0.
Simply breath taking.


-- 

*
*
 Registered Linux User Number 185956
  http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux
7:28pm  up 71 days, 41 min,  5 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.14, 0.10
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Ken Moffat

I downloaded the 3 cd's, which installed flawlessly, then after playing
for a while I ran the caldera update script, which ran, but had many
errors downloading rpm's, BUT I kept at it, just pressing 'next' over
and over until it completed, and the rpm's were all installed. Worked
fine, but a bit time and mouse finger consuming. My one beef (other than
the price!) right now is the inability to install the yahoo messenger
rpm; dependency problems. I went with gaim instead. works well. 
Caldera 3.1.1 is stable and works well so far. 
Netscape 4.7, pretty dated but stable. 
Old Mozilla, but it works. I updated to a different directory without
problem, so have 2 mozillas installed.
Opera 6 works well.
Sylpheed mail/news installs fine.
Xfce and Icewm both installed from source fine, and were easily added to
the login session menu.



On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:50:14 -0700
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:43 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:18, Tony Alfrey wrote:
   Hi gang!
  
   Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
   In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
   Thanks
 
  Geez, Tony where yer bin mate. Both of us over the years have
  'talked' and I guess i know a few things that you require, 3.1.1 is
  not one of them. Unless you like being frustrated at not being able
  to update easily. They went backwards and still are going that way
  since 2.4.. The door is that way, Sir grin
 
 Geeze Looeeze Skipmeister, whadda ya tryin' t do t me??  Everybody's 
 got me enthused about 3.1.1 and now you tell me it is bad news???
 What do you mean that it won't update??  Inquiring minds want to know.
 
 -- 
 Tony Alfrey
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I'd rather be sailing
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
 http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the
 above URL.
 


-- 
Ken M
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: FreeSCO vs. SmoothWall

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Wunder

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:24 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
snip
 Two questions:
 1) Do you know where I can get the extra modules package?  Seems like its
 disapeared since freesco changed domains, and i need the eepro100  module
 for my NICs.

The freesco site? As I said, it just worked for me. The base package had the 
modules I needed. 

 2) Is it simply a matter of copying the floppy image to a HD, or how
 involved is it to get this running somewhere other than the floppy?


Don't know this either. I boot from floppy. Everything's on a RAM disk, the 
only time it touches the floppy is to boot. The only time it boots is after a 
power outage, (and after Home went belly up). I've booted it less than 10 
times since orignally set up 2 years ago (yeah, our power rarely goes out -- 
knock wood). I've got a copy of it's config on my hard drive and an extra 
floppy as backup. What's wrong with booting from floppy?

-- 
Caldera eWorkstation 3.1+, kernel 2.4.18-preempt, KDE 3.0.1, Xfree86 4.1.0
  4:00pm  up 1 day, 20:23,  5 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Tony Alfrey

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 03:30 pm,Jerry McBride wrote:
 On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:50:14 -0700 Tony Alfrey
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:43 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
   On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:18, Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
   
Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
Thanks
  
   Geez, Tony where yer bin mate. Both of us over the years have
   'talked' and I guess i know a few things that you require, 3.1.1
   is not one of them. Unless you like being frustrated at not being
   able to update easily. They went backwards and still are going
   that way since 2.4.. The door is that way, Sir
   grin
 
  Geeze Looeeze Skipmeister, whadda ya tryin' t do t me?? 
  Everybody's got me enthused about 3.1.1 and now you tell me it is
  bad news??? What do you mean that it won't update??  Inquiring
  minds want to know.

 In the big picture, WS 3.1.1 is a really nice distribtuion. However,
 it's already getting to feel dated. If you really
 gotta' have a nice, up-to-date, user friendly distro... go SUSE 8.0.
 Simply breath taking.

H.  Are you on the SuSE list?  I follow it and there seems to be a 
moderate amount of angst with various things about 8.0.  So I've been 
reluctant to spend my time on it.

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Aaron Grewell

From a stability standpoint 1.2 and 1.3 totally rocked.  It bugged me
that the glibc issues made my boxes totally incompatible with everyone
else's, but judging from the wailing RH users were doing about the early
glibc2 releases I'm really glad I missed that evilness.

On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 16:57, Bob Hemus wrote:
 Kurt Wall wrote:
  
  Scribbling feverishly on May 22, Stuart Biggerstaff managed to emit:
   At 01:47 PM 5/22/02 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
   The release order of the 2+ versions we've used as I remember it was:
   
   OpenLinux 2.2   # we skipped this one -- rushed to make the first LinuxWorld
   OpenLinux 2.3
   eServer 2.3 # last to use LILO
   eDesktop 2.4# first to use GRUB
  
   ...also when they replaced KPPP with KsaferPPP, as I recall?  And it was
   between 2.x and 3.x they brought out LTP.  With that, I wonder if the
   perfect distro people are remembering isn't kind of a combination of 2.3,
   2.4 and LTP, as some started losing patience with Caldera at 2.4, while
   others held on till the 3.1 controversy.
  
  Of all the releases, I preferred eDesktop 2.4 the most.
  
  Kurt
  --
 Did you folks forget about COL 1.3?
 Bob
 -- 
 A wise man can see more from the bottom of a well,
 than a fool can see from a mountain top.
   Unknown
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Collins

On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:50:14 -0700 Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:43 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:18, Tony Alfrey wrote:
   Hi gang!
  
   Anybody had any experience installing 3.1.1?
   In other words, does it seem like a well-assembled distro?
   Thanks
 
  Geez, Tony where yer bin mate. Both of us over the years have
  'talked' and I guess i know a few things that you require, 3.1.1
  is not one of them. Unless you like being frustrated at not being
  able to update easily. They went backwards and still are going
  that way since 2.4.. The door is that way, Sir
  grin
 
 Geeze Looeeze Skipmeister, whadda ya tryin' t do t me??  Everybody's
 
 got me enthused about 3.1.1 and now you tell me it is bad news???
 What do you mean that it won't update??  Inquiring minds want to
 know.
 

I think Skippy is just trying to tell me what we all learned along the
way.  Caldera was never especially good at providing updates (except
for security), and the Caldera file setup was sufficiently different,
that most RPMS would not work without major surgery.

If you want an upgradable system, try RedHat/Mandrake or Debian
(updates for most things available), Slackware (somewhat fewer
choices.  Or gentoo (if you can tolerate updates from source), but I'm
not supposed to say that out loud.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



kernel question?

2002-05-22 Thread Robt. Hemus

May I upgrade my kernel, or remove it and replace it, with the 
linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2   from the LFS site as I would a patch?
Bob
-- 
I just heard that photons have mass.  I didn't even know they were Catholics.
Don Geddis
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: kernel question?

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Neither really.  You should never remove a working kernel until you have 
a known good replacement.

Robt. Hemus wrote:
 May I upgrade my kernel, or remove it and replace it, with the 
 linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2   from the LFS site as I would a patch?
 Bob


-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   6:25pm  up 34 days,  1:18,  3 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.08

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 23 May 2002 06:47, Bill Campbell wrote:

 OpenLinux 2.2   # we skipped this one -- rushed to make the first
 LinuxWorld OpenLinux 2.3
 eServer 2.3 # last to use LILO
 eDesktop 2.4# first to use GRUB
 OpenLinux 3.1 Workstation and Server
 OpenLinux 3.1.1 Workstation and Server
 freebsd 4.5 (whoops not Caldera, but perhaps where I'm headed as
 it installs easily without graphics, and does all the
 server things I need :-).

 Bill

Did LTP come between 2.4 and 3.1 ?

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Keith Antoine wrote:
 On Thursday 23 May 2002 06:47, Bill Campbell wrote:
 
 
OpenLinux 2.2   # we skipped this one -- rushed to make the first
LinuxWorld OpenLinux 2.3
eServer 2.3 # last to use LILO
eDesktop 2.4# first to use GRUB
OpenLinux 3.1 Workstation and Server
OpenLinux 3.1.1 Workstation and Server
freebsd 4.5 (whoops not Caldera, but perhaps where I'm headed as
it installs easily without graphics, and does all the
server things I need :-).

Bill
 
 
 Did LTP come between 2.4 and 3.1 ?

yup



-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   6:25pm  up 34 days,  1:18,  3 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.08

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Greetings,
I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB 
drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a 
CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files 
on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).

The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /

What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have 
enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.

Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i 
could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been 
pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing 
this.

If anyone has any alternate solutions, i'd be eager to hear them as well.

thanks!

-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   6:25pm  up 34 days,  1:18,  3 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.08

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 23 May 2002 07:15, Jim Conner wrote:
 IIRC, Caldera released them in this order.

 Desktop
 --
 OpenLinux 2.3
 eDesktop 2.4
 Linux Technology Preview(LTP)
 W3.1
 W3.1.1

Right thought ltp was in that order.

 I'm not sure what was released by Caldera prior to that because I've only
 been using Caldera for a little over 2 years.  I agree that eD2.4 was a
 very stable and updatable distro.  As far as W3.x is concerned, I'm not
 very happy with it.  It works, but I'd like to have some of the latest libs
 to run 3D games.  These have to be installed and/or updated by tarballs. 
 I'd also like to try out KDE3(KDE3.0.1 has just been released today). 
 Caldera used to make rpms for each stable(and some beta) releases of KDE. 
 The last rpm package made by Caldera for KDE was KDE2.2.1.  Granted, I
 could compile KDE  QT from tarballs, but have you ever done this on a
 P200mmx with 64MB of ram?  I don't have time to do this and after it's done
 to find I didn't do it
 right(Murphy's Law) and have to do it again.  Well, I hope that either
 Caldera changes, or I'm going to have to change.  I'd like to see this
 project succeed, but ongoing package updates are crucial to the life of a
 distro.

Well I have at least started , by copying it to a partition on the HD. I also 
have many rpms that I have done for SuSE 8.0 I am sure that I can use to 
update this. I am also aware that there is a system whereby one can get a 
tarball and rpm it staright away. I am fortunate in that I have a _GRUNT_ 
system in h/w. I run a BIG hardware supplier online and look after his 
website (http://www.gamedude.com.au), I get everything at cost and he trades 
the old stuff for me.
Athlon XP2000, Soltek MB DDR 1gig, 60  20 gig 7200 HD.

So as dep suggested start with 2.4 and go from there, as I also said I am open 
to suggestions too. I need things to occupy me, 

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread dep

begin  Keith Antoine's  quote:

| Ok so I do have the right release disk here. I like grub myself but
| most do not, what I am doing is to copy tye disk to HD and start
| upgrading it. I also want to alter the install and add a bit in
| like, lilo/grub choice install, recognotion of tv cards and camera
| memory card readers etc. NO devfs though. Choice of installing a WM
| or not.
|
| Now I am not a software man so I will need _HELP_ and also some
| reccomendations/feedback from the list.

i propose that the resulting distribution be called skippy, and i 
for one will rush to put it on every machine here.

also, 2.4 had both lilo and grub, though the latter was the default, i 
believe. i remember distinctly not liking the change, but being 
satisfied that lilo was also provided. and i believe that the version 
they provided actually worked.
-- 
dep

http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within the 
envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 23 May 2002 07:46, Tony Alfrey wrote:
 On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:23 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 May 2002 08:47, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
   Skippy
  
  do you need the original ed 2.4 cd ? I have a one copy here and
   there are several in a store thelast time I looked. I can burn a
   copy if you need it.
  
   cheers
 
  Memory on my part is one of my downfalls. However was there not a
  release before the eDesktop 2.4 that was just a plain Caldera 2.4 ?
  Was this not the best release of all, or am I getting mixed up again.
  If so I do have the eD 2.4. At what stage was the LTP release I had
  success with,  after Ed2.4 or before, i.e after 2.4 and prior to 3.0.

 Hey SkippyDude;  too much time in the sun for you ;-)
 eD 2.4 = Caldera 2.4 = COL2.4
 LTP = just after 2.4;  I'm still running this with lots of upgrades.
 This is why I asked dep about wasn't 3.1 supposed to be 2.4 with all
 the stuff improved.

AFAIAC its no improvement, especially with kde-2.1.1 and no upgrading.


-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread William F. Day

what about mounting a share (NFS or Samba) and making the tarbal on it?

Bill Day

Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
  8:10pm  up 7 days, 19:24,  2 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00

- Original Message -
From: Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: backing up a laptop


 Greetings,
 I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB
 drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a
 CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files
 on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).

 The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /

 What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have
 enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.

 Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i
 could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been
 pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing
 this.

 If anyone has any alternate solutions, i'd be eager to hear them as well.

 thanks!

 --
 ~
 L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com

6:25pm  up 34 days,  1:18,  3 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.08

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.363 / Virus Database: 201 - Release Date: 5/21/02

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Leon A. Goldstein

Tony Alfrey wrote:
 H.  Are you on the SuSE list?  I follow it and there seems to be a 
 moderate amount of angst with various things about 8.0.  So I've been 
 reluctant to spend my time on it.
 

I have SuSE 8 on my lab rat where I too reluctantly spend time with
it.
Its latest stunt: I installed XCDRoast alpha 10 and the necessary
updated libs.
When I later installed a different app, YAST decided it did not like the
updated
XCDRoast and its libs and reinstalled the old versions.

-- 
Leon A. Goldstein
Powered by Caldera Linux 2.4
System 5WV271
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread Bill Campbell

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:34:15PM -0700, Net Llama! wrote:
Greetings,
I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB 
drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a 
CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files 
on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).

The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /

What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have 
enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.

Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i 
could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been 
pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing 
this.

If anyone has any alternate solutions, i'd be eager to hear them as well.

There are several ways to do this, most have to do with networking unless
you want to play with PCMCIA removable media, FireWire, or other goodies.
Some possibilites, not in order of efficiency, but as I'm thinking of them:

NFS mount a directory on another machine, then use a command like this:
cd /
find ./boot ./ -xdev | cpio -pdumv $nfsmounteddir

Use secure copy, scp, but I don't think it has the ability to
restrict the copy to a single device as the ``-xdev'' option to
find allows.

Rsync is an excellent method although it might be a bit slow the first
time, and it might run out of memory at some point.  It does have the
ability to limit transfers to one file system.  It's also better to run
rsync as a server on the remote system rather than use ssh assuming that
you're on a reasonably secure network.  Assuming that you've set
up the server, and have laptop_update defined in /etc/rsyncd.conf
on that system:

cd /
rsync -x -var --delete ./ ./boot remotesys::laptop_update

This will transfer only those files that have changed, deleting
anything that's on the server, but not on the laptop.

Bill
--
INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:   camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:(206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

``We maintain that the very foundation of our way of life is what we call
free enterprise,'' said Cash McCall, but when one of our citizens
show enough free enterprise to pile up a little of that profit, we do
our best to make him feel that he ought to be ashamed of himself.
-- Cameron Hawley
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: KDE 3.0.1 is out

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Keith Antoine wrote:
 On Thursday 23 May 2002 09:30, Tim Wunder wrote:
 
Been running it for a week ;-)
 
 
 AND ?

He's still waiting for KMail to start up   ;)



-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   6:50pm  up 34 days,  1:43,  3 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.10, 0.11

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

No file servers available.  :(

William F. Day wrote:
 what about mounting a share (NFS or Samba) and making the tarbal on it?
 
 Bill Day
 
 Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
   8:10pm  up 7 days, 19:24,  2 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:34 PM
 Subject: backing up a laptop
 
 
 
Greetings,
I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB
drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a
CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files
on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).

The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /

What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have
enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.

Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i
could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been
pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing
this.

If anyone has any alternate solutions, i'd be eager to hear them as well.

thanks!


-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   6:55pm  up 34 days,  1:48,  3 users,  load average: 0.17, 0.07, 0.09

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread Andrew Mathews

Net Llama! wrote:

 Greetings,
 I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB 
 drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a 
 CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files 
 on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).
 
 The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /
 
 What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have 
 enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.
 
 Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i 
 could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been 
 pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing 
 this.
 
 If anyone has any alternate solutions, i'd be eager to hear them as well.
 
 thanks!
 

You didn't say whether you had an available tape drive on another 
machine or not, but tar can be redirected to a remote device on another 
machine using rsh to connect. Even if you don't have a tape drive, you 
can write the tarball to a remote file on disk. Use the 
--file=HOSTNAME:/DEV/FILE NAME syntax to connect to a remote device. 
 From the info tar page:

`tar' will complete the remote connection, if possible, and prompt you
for a username and password.  If you use `--file=@HOSTNAME:/DEV/FILE
NAME', `tar' will complete the remote connection, if possible, using
your username as the username on the remote machine.

If the archive file name includes a colon (`:'), then it is assumed
to be a file on another machine.  If the archive file is
`USER@HOST:FILE', then FILE is used on the host HOST.  The remote host
is accessed using the `rsh' program, with a username of USER.  If the
username is omitted (along with the `' sign), then your user name will
be used.  (This is the normal `rsh' behavior.)  It is necessary for the
remote machine, in addition to permitting your `rsh' access, to have
the `/usr/ucb/rmt' program installed.  If you need to use a file whose
name includes a colon, then the remote tape drive behavior can be
inhibited by using the `--force-local' option.


-- 
Andrew Mathews

   8:05pm  up 11 days, 19:46,  7 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00

I think my career is ruined!

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Caldera 3.1.1

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 23 May 2002 11:47, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
 Tony Alfrey wrote:
  H.  Are you on the SuSE list?  I follow it and there seems to be a
  moderate amount of angst with various things about 8.0.  So I've been
  reluctant to spend my time on it.

 I have SuSE 8 on my lab rat where I too reluctantly spend time with
 it.
 Its latest stunt: I installed XCDRoast alpha 10 and the necessary
 updated libs.
 When I later installed a different app, YAST decided it did not like the
 updated
 XCDRoast and its libs and reinstalled the old versions.

Thats not the only thing it does, I installed a few non Suse tarballs etc plus 
the latest xcdroast. I had crapped on all of them to the extent that i have 
had to reinstall cdrecordtools 3 times so far. It also just reinstalled some 
xine and other streaming video packages. No it and Mandrake are not on my 
Xmas list any longer.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread Jerry McBride

On Wed, 22 May 2002 18:34:15 -0700 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Greetings,
 I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB 
 drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a 
 CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files 
 on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).
 
 The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /
 
 What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have 
 enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.
 
 Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i 
 could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been 
 pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing 
 this.
 

You didn't mention if it was lan ready... If so, just copy the lot over to
the server and then to your backup medium of choice... Otherwise, if it
has a parallel port, score yourself a parallel lap-link style cable and
transfer it all via PLIP... it'll be slow as hell, but you'll end up with
a backup anyways... But ethernet is so much better... :')



-- 

*
* Registered Linux User Number 185956
  http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=ensafe=offgroup=linux
10:34pm  up 71 days,  3:47,  5 users,  load average: 0.11, 0.16, 0.17
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: backing up a laptop

2002-05-22 Thread Net Llama!

Jerry McBride wrote:
 On Wed, 22 May 2002 18:34:15 -0700 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 
Greetings,
I've got a bit of a problem on my hands.  I've got a laptop with a 4GB 
drive, that currently has about 1.7GB free (less than half).  It has a 
CDROM(not a burner)  floppy drive.  Thus, the only way I can get files 
on or off the HD, is via the floppy or with scp (ssh).

The HD is partitioned so that hda1 is /boot, hda2 is swap, and hda3 is /

What I want to do is backup the entire disk, however since I don't have 
enough free space on the HD, i can't just create one big tarball.

Does anyone know of a way to pipe the output from tar to scp so that i 
could automatically dump the tarball onto a remote box?  I've been 
pooring through the tar  scp man pages and can't find any way of doing 
this.

 
 
 You didn't mention if it was lan ready... If so, just copy the lot over to

Yes, it does have a 10/100 PCMCIA NIC.

 the server and then to your backup medium of choice... Otherwise, if it
 has a parallel port, score yourself a parallel lap-link style cable and
 transfer it all via PLIP... it'll be slow as hell, but you'll end up with
 a backup anyways... But ethernet is so much better... :')

D`oh!  Why didn't i think of this?
me so stupid

thanks!



-- 
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com

   7:35pm  up 34 days,  2:28,  3 users,  load average: 0.19, 0.08, 0.07

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Installation Guide for OO

2002-05-22 Thread Brett I. Holcomb

I have that - have had for a while.  Someone on the mail list finally gave 
me the URL.  This really should be in the README or INSTALL files!  I was 
poking fun at the fact that another link to some install instructions 
couldn't be opened in OOo.

bof wrote:

 See http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/instructions.html
 
 Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
 
And what if OOo won't open it G - which it didn't!
  


-- 
Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AKA Grunt 
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 23 May 2002 11:38, dep wrote:

 i propose that the resulting distribution be called skippy, and i
 for one will rush to put it on every machine here.

Rofl! Er, I think..

 also, 2.4 had both lilo and grub, though the latter was the default, i
 believe. i remember distinctly not liking the change, but being
 satisfied that lilo was also provided. and i believe that the version
 they provided actually worked.

One point and I have seen chatter about it before BUT: What difference would 
an i386.rpm have to an i686 and would it be best to do them as i386? Suse 
rpms will install with Caldera, won't they ?

Yep I know the road is going to be long but

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: a crackpot idea i had

2002-05-22 Thread Keith Antoine

On Thursday 23 May 2002 11:38, dep wrote:

 i propose that the resulting distribution be called skippy, and i
 for one will rush to put it on every machine here.

BTW is there anything specific to the task I am knowingly throwing myself into
that I should read ?

No sarcastic remarks will be tolerated, like read the Bible and so on.

-- 
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage



___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: KDE 3.0.1 is out

2002-05-22 Thread stayler

On Wed, 22 May 2002 17:56:54 -0400 (EDT), Net Llama! wrote:

Does it still suck? ;)

ROFLMAO!

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: FreeSCO vs. SmoothWall

2002-05-22 Thread Tim Wunder

On Wednesday 22 May 2002 09:19 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
 Tim Wunder wrote:
  On Wednesday 22 May 2002 01:24 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
snip
 2) Is it simply a matter of copying the floppy image to a HD, or how
 involved is it to get this running somewhere other than the floppy?
 
  Don't know this either. I boot from floppy. Everything's on a RAM disk,
  the only time it touches the floppy is to boot. The only time it boots is
  after a power outage, (and after Home went belly up). I've booted it
  less than 10 times since orignally set up 2 years ago (yeah, our power
  rarely goes out -- knock wood). I've got a copy of it's config on my hard
  drive and an extra floppy as backup. What's wrong with booting from
  floppy?

 I dunno.  I just thought that I'd have to reconfigure everything from
 scratch if i ever rebooted.  Is that not the case?

Nope. Once it's configured (and saved), you're done. The only thing I've ever 
changed on the configuration is the ports I forward.  I've never had a hard 
drive in my Freesco router, and I don't plan on ever putting one in. 

-- 
Caldera eWorkstation 3.1+, kernel 2.4.18-preempt, KDE 3.0.1, Xfree86 4.1.0
 12:00am  up 2 days,  4:23,  6 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.