Re: xfs is horked!?
Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems that it can't find a font that it needs. ugh. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Joel Hammer wrote: Sometimes this sort of error occurs when another process is already using that port. Or, this might be a permissions thing. Joel On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:43:02PM -0700, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/01/03 21:35, Tim Wunder wrote: On Monday 02 June 2003 12:23 am, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: snip Any suggestions on where to start? Uninstall/Reinstall the RPM for xfs? Probly what I'd try first... tried that, no love. Looks like i've pinned down an error: xfs: Cannot establish any listening sockets i just can't figure out for the life of me why. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xfs is horked!?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Net Llama! wrote: | Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I | don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem | (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although | something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems | that it can't find a font that it needs. ugh. You may want to try chkfontpath to see how it compares to mine. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# chkfontpath -l Current directories in font path: 1: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled 2: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled 3: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled 4: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc 5: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 6: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo 7: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic 8: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF 9: /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1 10: 11: /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts snip - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 7:51am up 51 days, 16:20, 10 users, load average: 1.23, 1.26, 1.28 - - You will be run over by a bus. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+21agejAu2RVHwF4RAuS5AJ0UbbyE+bFPv1YRujFgNl4cGV6SrgCfSDw+ lKyRQYixceyp07Ju4VQwIEc= =vgOP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xfs is horked!?
'tarred' to copy a system? Yikes. I know GNU tar is better at this than older tars, but I would have used cpio, which handles device and special files (like pipes) better. Just personal (and probably superstitious) behavior. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:39:34 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems that it can't find a font that it needs. ugh. -- ++···+ · Roger Oberholtzer · E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]· · OPQ Systems AB · WWW: http://www.opq.se/ · · Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 ·Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 · · 115 34 Stockholm · Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 · · Sweden · Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 · ++···+ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: the latest from sco
begin Roger Oberholtzer's quote: | And by licenses, I would imagine that must mean SOURCE licenses, | Since my Caldera came with the SOURCE (GNU and all that) as well as | a License from SCO, am I a SOURCE licensee? Of course, not of | UnixWare/SVR5. The interview referrd to 30,000 licensees. These | cannot be UnixWare/SVR5 source licensees, can it? Sounds like a | hefty number. ah, but the quote is 30,000 licenses and sub-licenses with 6,000 entities, which include many on the fortune 2000. it does not surprise me that there would be 6,000 entities in the world using sco unix -- hell, there are probably 6,000 entities using *OS/2*! | Of course, I was surprised that the Lindows guys are SVR5 source | licensees. I would not have imagined that fit in their model. But | it seems they admit that they put UnixWare code in the Linux they | distribute. Wasn't that the reason for them getting a License? god only knows what the lindows people are up to. | Whether they gave this code back to the Linux kernel generally is | unclear. But, wouldn't they have had to include the source in their | distro? The GPL virus and all. Still, any license use errors by | Lindows is nothing their customers can be held accountable for. there's no way i can find, or anyone i can find who does not get paid by sco who believes, that users are at any risk at all. -- dep http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: the latest from sco
Roger Oberholtzer wrote: And by licenses, I would imagine that must mean SOURCE licenses, Since my Caldera came with the SOURCE (GNU and all that) as well as a License from SCO, am I a SOURCE licensee? Of course, not of UnixWare/SVR5. The interview referrd to 30,000 licensees. These cannot be UnixWare/SVR5 source licensees, can it? Sounds like a hefty number. The way I interpreted was the 30,000 licenses are indeed for UnixWare/SVR5. I'd guess that he's including licensing agreements for older code as well, perhaps going back to licenses given to universities. Shawn ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: the latest from sco
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:55:58 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there's no way i can find, or anyone i can find who does not get paid by sco who believes, that users are at any risk at all. I feel this as well. Still, I was surprised to get the letter in the e-mail from them. The 'funny' thing is that, even though I have been a partner and developer and all for a number of years (SCO pre Caldera and later Caldera), I seldom, if ever, get e-mail related to these things. But this one I got. Priorities... -- ++···+ · Roger Oberholtzer · E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]· · OPQ Systems AB · WWW: http://www.opq.se/ · · Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 ·Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 · · 115 34 Stockholm · Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 · · Sweden · Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 · ++···+ ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xfs is horked!?
You may be right. I just did 'tar cvf f00.tar /' and ended up with a 2.6GB tarball, which seemed about right. At this point the only damage appears to be the /tmp permissions weirdness, and the current 'missing' fonts.The laptop is at home, so i'll do some more digging tonight. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: 'tarred' to copy a system? Yikes. I know GNU tar is better at this than older tars, but I would have used cpio, which handles device and special files (like pipes) better. Just personal (and probably superstitious) behavior. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:39:34 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems that it can't find a font that it needs. ugh. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop
On Monday 02 June 2003 11:18, Shawn L Johnston wrote: Does anyone know anything about this Enterprise Desktop product? I've only seen this article on it http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/04/02/HNsusedelay_1.html which says that its supposed to be available in June, but I haven't found anything about it on SuSE's site. They came out with that product in the days of 8.1 I think and it was introduced after 8.1 became available. I believe what it is is the current product (8.2) with some added commercial products (maybe StarOffice instead of OO) plus others and a desktop set up for an 'enterprise user'. The idea being that it is a product that a company could install and make it their desktop, with all the necessities of that environment. Thanks, Shawn ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Multi-line regular expression matching
I'm attempting to write a script that will delete a certain portion of a data file. What I want to do is delete everything between (and including) two lines, line A and line B The file: ... #lineA ... #lineB ... To an extent I don't really care what tool is used, but I've been unable to accomplish the task with either Perl or SED so I'm wondering if there might be something wrong with the regular expressions that I've tried. A couple of the reg-exp's that I've tried: 's/#lineA.*#lineB//gs' 's/#lineA(.|\n)*#lineB//gs' Both of the above seem to work fine if #lineA and #lineB are on the same line in the file (I've yet to add in anything to check if #lineA and #lineB occur at the start of the line, but that'll be added in later). Shouldn't the /s modifier allow multi-line matching to take place? David Aikema ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Wordperfect in linux?
Roger Oberholtzer wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2003 09:08:02 -0400 Joel Hammer<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I used to use WP8 for linux. Fine program but it did get a bit outdated. I > think I finally got fed up with the filter nonsense. > > I tried WP office 2000 when it first came out. It was a dog, as we all > know, written to run with wine. Bad fonts, unstable, just awful. > > There have been big improvements they say in wine and certainly the > computers are faster and the memory is cheaper. Is anyone using the > Wordperfect office suite in linux lately? No. But I have been having success with FrameMaker under Wine. Fonts seem much better. I have not put it through rigorous testing as I haven't had the time yet. But I will. I know that codeweavers claim to support Word now. And their improvements do get back into the wine release. So, maybe WP will also work much better. I picked up a copy of WPO 2000 from http://www.softwareandstuff.com/s_tech_net_linuxwp9.html for $24 delivered. This version is apparently a later release. I have installed it on Libranet 2.7 and .2.8, and eDesk 2.4. Installation on Caldera WS 3.1.1 is not so happy. There is an error report on starting WP9 than you can click through, and writing tools are disabled. Installation is better on SuSE 8.0 if libaps is installed first, as advised in the release notes. It does not run at all on SuSE 8.2. It works quite well. The WPO2KL version I got is the deluxe package and includes Paradox 9. It and Quattro Pro are stable, probably thanks to that tight Borland API. There is a bug that causes WP9 to crash if I open a second document, but this can be handled by opening (from the file manager) and closing each document in turn. The documents are then listed at the bottom of the file menu, and can be opened simultaneously thereafter for cut-and-paste work. The M$ Word filter is very good. I opened a large .doc file with an embedded Excel table without a hitch, even though this file was inaccessible to Applix Word and WP 8.1/Linux, even with the Filtrix patch. The package comes with a large library of TT fonts, which must be installed one by one. Comparing notes with an owner of the original release, the one I got, which apparently was intended for the UK market, has later file dates than the original release. Said other owner reports that the Fontastic font manager is crippled after installing CrossOver Office. It also includes a small 3 " plush Tux toy, vice the inflatable penguin that came with the original. CrossOver Office informed me that support for WPxx/win is still on the drawing board, but I get the impression it is not a priority. -- Leon A. Goldstein Powered by Libranet 1.9.1 Debian Linux System 5151 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Multi-line regular expression matching
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to write a script that will delete a
certain portion of a
data file. What I want to do is delete everything
between (and including)
two lines, line A and line B
The file:
...
#lineA
...
#lineB
...
To an extent I don't really care what tool is used,
but I've been unable
to accomplish the task with either Perl or SED so
I'm wondering if there
might be something wrong with the regular
expressions that I've tried.
A couple of the reg-exp's that I've tried:
's/#lineA.*#lineB//gs'
's/#lineA(.|\n)*#lineB//gs'
Both of the above seem to work fine if #lineA and
#lineB are on the same
line in the file (I've yet to add in anything to
check if #lineA and
#lineB occur at the start of the line, but that'll
be added in later).
Shouldn't the /s modifier allow multi-line matching
to take place?
David Aikema
Here's a little 3-line awk script that should work.
# set flag when we find the beginning
/lineA/ { found = 1 }
# print only when we haven't found the beginning
{ if (! found) print($0) }
# clear flag when we find the end
/lineB/ { found = 0 }
Here's another example, this time using vim.
command:
vi -s script-file data-file
script-file contains:
/lineA
d/lineB
dd
:x data-file.new
HTH,
Brad.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
warning RAM
I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? Thanks Enrico ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? What kind of videcard do you have? What does the output from 'free -m' look like? -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) What does the output from 'free -m' look like? total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 883239644 0 34109 -/+ buffers/cache: 95787 Swap: 989 0989 -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMohttp://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. HA! HA! HA! Come on!, This video card doesn't share memory. It uses his own memory. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMohttp://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2 different kernals and the enterprise is required for that much ram. Just a thought. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:17:42 +0200 (CEST) Enrico Pirani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. HA! HA! HA! Come on!, This video card doesn't share memory. It uses his own memory. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:17 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. HA! HA! HA! Come on!, This video card doesn't share memory. It uses his own memory. Not true, depends on the chipset/mobo, reference (one amoung many); http://bizforums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xb2703fd7f72ad611abd50090277a778c,00.html ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Registered Linux user 193414 http://counter.li.org Don't be afraid to try something. Remember that amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Monday 02 June 2003 04:34 pm, Vern W Heesch wrote: Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2 different kernals and the enterprise is required for that much ram. Just a thought. Not exactly, what you are thinking about is the kernel ability to use 3G or more. Which is an option that can be set when compiling the kernel. I have successfully used 1G on the standard ML9.1 distro. Mobo depent. You may have to append the memory size in grub or lilo. What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. HA! HA! HA! Come on!, This video card doesn't share memory. It uses his own memory. -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMohttp://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Registered Linux user 193414 http://counter.li.org Don't be afraid to try something. Remember that amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Dennis Veatch wrote: On Monday 02 June 2003 04:17 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. HA! HA! HA! Come on!, This video card doesn't share memory. It uses his own memory. Not true, depends on the chipset/mobo, reference (one amoung many); http://bizforums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xb2703fd7f72ad611abd50090277a778c,00.html Hey, look better: .The 11mb shared memory is dynamically allocated... meaning the system will automatically allocated this memory from the ram when it is required. The 11mb comes from the system memory, so it robs the system of RAM. You most likely have an intel 81x series chipset inside your computer... bascially this means that you have no actualy video card, but your chipset contains graphics into the motherboard. The intel integrated My card is a PCI based video card equipped with 128Mb DDR-Ram. again look better: ..If you want to install a video card, you will have to install a PCI based video card, unless if you upgrade to a motherboard that contains an AGP slot. The PCI based video card will improve performance greatly, but it will still not be comparable to an AGP based video card. A popular video card that is in the PCI format is the ATI Radeon 32mb SDR. The problem is, ATI may have discontinued this card, so it may be hard to find.. Enrico ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- Registered Linux user 193414 http://counter.li.org Don't be afraid to try something. Remember that amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:52:27 -0400 Dennis Veatch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 02 June 2003 04:34 pm, Vern W Heesch wrote: Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2 different kernals and the enterprise is required for that much ram. Just a thought. Not exactly, what you are thinking about is the kernel ability to use 3G or more. Which is an option that can be set when compiling the kernel. I have successfully used 1G on the standard ML9.1 distro. Mobo depent. You may have to append the memory size in grub or lilo. OK, let´s clear the air about this now. The standard kernel will allow you to use up to 1Gb of memory. If you have 1Gb-4Gb, you need to select the 4Gb memory model when building your kernel. If you have 4Gb or more, you need the 64Gb (max RAM supported on ia32) option. The numbers are max memory, not minimum. I know this because I´ve seen it on systems w/ 3Gb and 8Gb of memory. It´s all in the Documentation (/usr/src/linux/Documentation/...). Ciao, David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto GPG key autoresponder: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Pirani wrote: snip | My card is a PCI based video card equipped with 128Mb DDR-Ram. snip | Enrico snip You also need to verify that 1. Your system BIOS is actually enabling your total amount of memory. 2. Your motherboard supports that amount. 3. You don't have any bad memory that's being disabled. That means both system memory and video memory. Also what's the output of dmesg, cat /proc/meminfo? - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 3:21pm up 51 days, 23:50, 12 users, load average: 1.81, 1.62, 1.44 - - Wishing without work is like fishing without bait. -- Frank Tyger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+28kJejAu2RVHwF4RAtYnAJ9sT9U9FrW0frJdnsdd3qr9gyItTgCbB/bg lmJ9xJTjBTOV8FXzSvs2Xw0= =rF6W -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Monday 02 June 2003 05:14 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Dennis Veatch wrote: On Monday 02 June 2003 04:17 pm, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Enrico Pirani wrote: I'm using Slackware 9.0 with 1 GB ram. After checking the syslog I've noticed a waring message telling the kernel was using just 896 Mb ram. Why? What exactly does the warning look like? May 14 19:44:19 darkstar kernel: Warning only 896MB will be used What kind of videcard do you Nvidia Ti4200 (128Mb) 128MB + 896MB = 1024MB (1GB). That's your answer right there. If you don't like that, then you need to get a new videcard with its own dedicatred memory. HA! HA! HA! Come on!, This video card doesn't share memory. It uses his own memory. Not true, depends on the chipset/mobo, reference (one amoung many); http://bizforums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xb2703fd7f72ad611abd50 090277a778c,00.html Hey, look better: .The 11mb shared memory is dynamically allocated... meaning the system will automatically allocated this memory from the ram when it is required. The 11mb comes from the system memory, so it robs the system of RAM. You most likely have an intel 81x series chipset inside your computer... bascially this means that you have no actualy video card, but your chipset contains graphics into the motherboard. The intel integrated My card is a PCI based video card equipped with 128Mb DDR-Ram. again look better: ..If you want to install a video card, you will have to install a PCI based video card, unless if you upgrade to a motherboard that contains an AGP slot. The PCI based video card will improve performance greatly, but it will still not be comparable to an AGP based video card. A popular video card that is in the PCI format is the ATI Radeon 32mb SDR. The problem is, ATI may have discontinued this card, so it may be hard to find.. Enrico My point was that some video cards (that is built ins) do use system ram. Anyway have you tried appending mem= to lilo or grub? -- Registered Linux user 193414 http://counter.li.org Don't be afraid to try something. Remember that amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: warning RAM
On Monday 02 June 2003 05:52 pm, David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:52:27 -0400 Dennis Veatch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 02 June 2003 04:34 pm, Vern W Heesch wrote: Not sure if this applies to your distro, but in Mandrake there are 2 different kernals and the enterprise is required for that much ram. Just a thought. Not exactly, what you are thinking about is the kernel ability to use 3G or more. Which is an option that can be set when compiling the kernel. I have successfully used 1G on the standard ML9.1 distro. Mobo depent. You may have to append the memory size in grub or lilo. OK, let´s clear the air about this now. The standard kernel will allow you to use up to 1Gb of memory. If you have 1Gb-4Gb, you need to select the 4Gb memory model when building your kernel. If you have 4Gb or more, you need the 64Gb (max RAM supported on ia32) option. The numbers are max memory, not minimum. I know this because I´ve seen it on systems w/ 3Gb and 8Gb of memory. It´s all in the Documentation (/usr/src/linux/Documentation/...). Ciao, David A. Bandel Yes thats right. I should have been more clearer. -- Registered Linux user 193414 http://counter.li.org Don't be afraid to try something. Remember that amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xfs is horked!?
On 06/02/03 06:52, Andrew Mathews wrote: Net Llama! wrote: | Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I | don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem | (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although | something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems | that it can't find a font that it needs. ugh. You may want to try chkfontpath to see how it compares to mine. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# chkfontpath -l Current directories in font path: 1: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled 2: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled 3: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled 4: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc 5: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 6: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo 7: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic 8: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF 9: /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1 10: 11: /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts Looks kosher. Seems that the error that is getting dumped is: The font -bh-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-140-*-*-*-*-iso8559-* does not support all the required character sets for the current locale en_US.UTF.8 -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 5:35pm up 3 days, 1:51, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.09, 0.17 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xfs is horked!?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Net Llama! wrote: snip | | Looks kosher. Seems that the error that is getting dumped is: | The font -bh-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-140-*-*-*-*-iso8559-* does not | support all the required character sets for the current locale | en_US.UTF.8 | Ick. One of the first things I change is /etc/sysconfig/i18n and remove everything except en_US. The UTF fonts cause problems when displaying man pages, I don't know if it will help your problem though. - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 6:57pm up 3 days, 9:59, 12 users, load average: 1.52, 1.43, 1.20 - - Nothing is but what is not. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+2/RjidHQ0m/kEssRAivXAJ0U82NdyaZQFSKCGM7iTt8aOv4MmACeKJlY T2P5VS/UsH+FH6m/hMDRc1w= =svuN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: xfs is horked!?
On 06/02/03 17:40, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/02/03 06:52, Andrew Mathews wrote: Net Llama! wrote: | Turns out that the permissions on all of /tmp were somehow messed up. I | don't know how this is possible, when I tarred up the entire / filesystem | (which included eveything but /boot). So X is working now, although | something is still screwy with fonts, cause i can't open an xterm. Seems | that it can't find a font that it needs. ugh. You may want to try chkfontpath to see how it compares to mine. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# chkfontpath -l Current directories in font path: 1: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled 2: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled 3: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled 4: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc 5: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 6: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo 7: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic 8: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF 9: /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1 10: 11: /usr/share/AbiSuite/fonts Looks kosher. Seems that the error that is getting dumped is: The font -bh-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-140-*-*-*-*-iso8559-* does not support all the required character sets for the current locale en_US.UTF.8 OK, getting closer. Looks like the perms on /dev/ptys* were horked badly. chmod 666 /dev/ptys* fixed it, but now i'm getting aterm: can't open slave tty /dev/ttys0 when trying to start an aterm, and: xterm: Error 18, errno 13: Permission denied Reason: spawn: open() failed on ptsname when trying to spawn an xterm. this is RH9, there is no devfs (which seems to be the most common cause of this problem). any takers? -- ~ L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo:http://netllama.ipfox.com 6:00pm up 3 days, 2:16, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.07, 0.07 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Multi-line regular expression matching
For multiline edititing in sed, read about N and read about the hold space, too. Joel On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:24:24AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm attempting to write a script that will delete a certain portion of a data file. What I want to do is delete everything between (and including) two lines, line A and line B The file: ... #lineA ... #lineB ... To an extent I don't really care what tool is used, but I've been unable to accomplish the task with either Perl or SED so I'm wondering if there might be something wrong with the regular expressions that I've tried. A couple of the reg-exp's that I've tried: 's/#lineA.*#lineB//gs' 's/#lineA(.|\n)*#lineB//gs' Both of the above seem to work fine if #lineA and #lineB are on the same line in the file (I've yet to add in anything to check if #lineA and #lineB occur at the start of the line, but that'll be added in later). Shouldn't the /s modifier allow multi-line matching to take place? David Aikema ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
