OT SouthWare info needed.
I have a client that is running SouthWare Accounting Software on SCO OpenServer. So far, all the Local/Regional dealers want $ 1,500.00 PER USER to bump up their licensed user seats. Anyone Know of and are familiar with more Honest SouthWare dealers ? -- Ben Duncan Phone (601)-355-2574 Fax (601)-355-2573 Cell (601)-946-1220 Business Network Solutions 336 Elton Road Jackson MS, 39212 Software is like Sex, it is better when it's free - Linus Torvalds ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Regarding sendmail connections
Hi What kind of HDs? I can only say the speed that is 100MB/sec approx. Bandwith and other it is with the company who are holding our DNS etc... I have posted another email.. I want to know how many connections sendmail can accept... Becaues i am testing with 250k recrods and want to send from qmail server to sendmail server (just to check the qmail speed)... I checked with 50k records. i am seeing that first 10k records are coming in a speed that i expected but gradually it is coming down.. and sendmail also having very high load.. it is running between now 20-25 So what is the parameter i have to check for these and to see my connections limit... 2/3day back i posted my sendmail.mc file to this list also. Best Regards. -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Regarding sendmail connections
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote: Hi What kind of HDs? I can only say the speed that is 100MB/sec approx. Bandwith and other it is with the company who are holding our DNS etc... That doesn't answer the question of what kind of harddrives you have. I have posted another email.. I want to know how many connections sendmail can accept... Becaues i am testing with 250k recrods and want to send from qmail server to sendmail server (just to check the qmail speed)... I checked with 50k records. i am seeing that first 10k records are coming in a speed that i expected but gradually it is coming down.. and sendmail also having very high load.. it is running between now 20-25 So what is the parameter i have to check for these and to see my connections limit... 2/3day back i posted my sendmail.mc file to this list also. Best Regards. -Swapna -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Regarding sendmail connections
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Swapana Ghosh wrote: | Hi | | I want to check - how many connections our | Sendmail can accept and handle... | Which is the parameter will tell this? | | Regards. | -Swapna | | Unless defined by the ConnectionRateThrottle, MaxDaemonChildren, DelayLA, or RefuseLA parameters, it's limited by bandwidth, disk I/O, memory, processors, and numerous other variables. The -d44.4 flag when in testing mode will show the open file attempts, which is a beginning to determining a bottleneck. Try something like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# sendmail -bt -d0.1 Version 8.12.9 ~ Compiled with: DNSMAP HESIOD HES_GETMAILHOST LDAPMAP LOG MAP_REGEX ~MATCHGECOS MILTER MIME7TO8 MIME8TO7 NAMED_BIND NETINET NETINET6 ~NETUNIX NEWDB NIS PIPELINING SASLv2 SCANF STARTTLS TCPWRAPPERS ~USERDB USE_LDAP_INIT SYSTEM IDENTITY (after readcf) ~ (short domain name) $w = www ~ (canonical domain name) $j = www.linux-works.org ~ (subdomain name) $m = linux-works.org ~ (node name) $k = www.linux-works.org ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked) Enter ruleset address | /try local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trying envelope recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailer local canonify input: bozo @ yahoo . com Canonify2 input: bozo @ yahoo . com Canonify2returns: bozo @ yahoo . com . canonify returns: bozo @ yahoo . com . 2 input: bozo @ yahoo . com . 2returns: bozo @ yahoo . com . EnvToL input: bozo @ yahoo . com . EnvToL returns: bozo final input: bozo finalreturns: bozo Rcode = 0, addr = bozo |Ctrl-D There are 100 flags, each with a level from 0-127 Examples: - -d = -d0-99.1 - -d5 = -d5.1 - -d3.2,44.8,50-53.1 Also: - -d21 shows rewriting (same as -bt) - -d21.12 shows detailed rewriting - -d60 shows map lookups - -d11 shows mailer invocations - -d8.7 shows DNS chat - -d0.1 shows compiler flags and identity - -d0.4 shows probing for local names - -d0.10 shows OS dependent compile flags - -d44.4 shows file open attempts Don't forget to check your mailstats command for some cumulative information: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# mailstats Statistics from Fri Jun 6 00:00:02 2003 ~ M msgsfr bytes_from msgstobytes_to msgsrej msgsdis Mailer ~ 00 0K5 11K0 0 prog ~ 4 1157 7592K 58123K 155 0 esmtp ~ 9 1323 5860K 2427 8071K 30 0 local = ~ T 2480 13452K 2490 8205K 185 0 ~ C 2684 58 185 - -- Andrew Mathews - - ~ 1:47pm up 65 days, 22:19, 9 users, load average: 1.46, 0.70, 0.49 - - When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro... - -- Hunter S. Thompson -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+7iVQejAu2RVHwF4RArxwAJ9siZJVhiBozsOBL14oR8xWR4VFXgCfZdiu VN4b2ynO3LmpUCb1EmzMEp8= =NjtK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
IPSec (FreeS/WAN) anyone??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm trying to setup a VPN between 2 Linux servers using FreeS/WAN (network to network). Right now, everything seems to ok (pluto says the tunnel is up, routes looks ok, etc) except that not a single packet makes it through the tunnel (ie. no ping). First suspect was the firewall script (shorewall with all the settings for ipsec), so I just dropped all rules on both severs and changed all policies to ACCEPT (also checked for /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward = 1). Here's my ipsec.conf (keys truncated for easy reading): START config setup interfaces=%defaultroute klipsdebug=none plutodebug=all plutoload=%search plutostart=%search # defaults for subsequent connection descriptions conn %default keyingtries=0 disablearrivalcheck=no authby=rsasig conn bue-nqn left=hoerbiger.ipdinamica.com # Local vitals leftsubnet=192.168.10.0/24 # [EMAIL PROTECTED]# leftrsasigkey=0sAQNMdaf0YJ00... leftnexthop=%defaultroute # correct in many situations right=hoerbiger-nqn.ipdinamica.com # Remote vitals rightsubnet=192.168.11.0/24 # [EMAIL PROTECTED] # rightrsasigkey=0sAQN2C0tZXXY... rightnexthop=%defaultroute # correct in many situations auto=start # authorizes but doesn't start this # connection at startup END Notes, both ens are connected to internet with ADSL using dynamic IP, that's why I used hostnames instead of IPs. That shouldn't be a problem (at least until one of the ends gets a new IP). I have the logs from both servers as well as some info from route, ipsec, etc. If you can help, just tell me what you need and I'll send it. TIA! Federico Voges Socio gerente Intrasoft Malabia 2137 14 A (1425) Buenos Aires Argentina Te/Fax: 54-11-4833-5182 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.intrasoft.com.ar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 iQA/AwUBPu4v/hRcJRaVKt4XEQKNSQCfQekLDol+SgC9jzn9CBBHUl6eVPAAn0Wc 3/NQnkWI55TYr4r0xhnMvD54 =CsCJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Strange Reboot problem ...
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Lee wrote: Could be something intermittent in your power supply. Hi Lee, You got it. Finally (by chance) I discover the reason. The Power Supply has two fans and one of the them was broken. It appears that after a while running the Power Supply will get an overheat. The case is a SuperMicro Case (I am really happy with that case; I bought it two years ago and it was expensive but I think it is worth valuable). That Power Supply (300W) have a Red led and a beep system to warn about the overheat power supply problem. So the beep I used to hear was not from the computer was from the power supply case (I had not idea ¡¡). I have provisionally replaced the Power Supply with a 250W power supply until I could get a fan replacement and put again the original Power Supply. Best regards and thanks to all persons on the list that have helped with this problem. -- Javi, _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.europa3.com/users/fjherna/ \_(X)_(_)_(X)_/ http://www.valux.org/ !___!___!_Valencia(Spain) === Beauty and harmony are as necessary to you as the very breath of life. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
change default direcory path for ftp
Hi i want to do the ftp and want one fixed directory (which i need) by default.. Now if we do ftp , by default is /home/user. But if i want to change that... where i will look? Thanks in advance -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
SMP and kernel
How many out there are using a Linux kernel compiled with SMP support on a non-SMP (one processor) system? We have, over the last year or so, found numerous problems when doing so. Anyone else. Problems encountered with SMP was compiled into the kernel that went away when it was compiled out: 1. Serial port providing continuous data suddenly begins reporting incorrect info on available data when run asynchronously (SIGIO). 2. Firewire disks causing kernel panic on system boot. 3. Continuously active TCP ports suddenly going 'quiet', when data is indeed available. Adding the 'nosmp' directive to the kernel command line offers no joy. Only a compile without SMP solves these things. Every time. I have been looking for a coherent thread about this that does not just end with someone claiming the user is an idiot. I make mistakes, but I know a trend when I see one. This is just a query. Am I alone? Anyone else having issues here? Or know of anyone making similarly bizarre claims? (I would discuss kernel versions here, but I am not sure it is a simple indicator. Also, the systems that show the problems have been dissimilar.) -- Very Cloudy Stockholm Roger Oberholtzer ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SMP and kernel
I'm wondering why you're doing this in the first place. Why not just run a uniproc kernel? On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: How many out there are using a Linux kernel compiled with SMP support on a non-SMP (one processor) system? We have, over the last year or so, found numerous problems when doing so. Anyone else. Problems encountered with SMP was compiled into the kernel that went away when it was compiled out: 1. Serial port providing continuous data suddenly begins reporting incorrect info on available data when run asynchronously (SIGIO). 2. Firewire disks causing kernel panic on system boot. 3. Continuously active TCP ports suddenly going 'quiet', when data is indeed available. Adding the 'nosmp' directive to the kernel command line offers no joy. Only a compile without SMP solves these things. Every time. I have been looking for a coherent thread about this that does not just end with someone claiming the user is an idiot. I make mistakes, but I know a trend when I see one. This is just a query. Am I alone? Anyone else having issues here? Or know of anyone making similarly bizarre claims? (I would discuss kernel versions here, but I am not sure it is a simple indicator. Also, the systems that show the problems have been dissimilar.) -- Very Cloudy Stockholm Roger Oberholtzer ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
change default direcory path for ftp
Hi i want to do the ftp and want one fixed directory (which i need) by default.. Now if we do ftp , by default is /home/user. But if i want to change that... where i will look? I could able to change thanks to all -Swapna __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
SCO vs. ...
Anyone seen this in Cringley´s column? http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/16/24OPcringely_1.html Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$. And SCO's not even close to that big. SCO reminds me more and more of the little mouse trying to suck an elephant through a straw. David A. Bandel -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. Nemesis Racing Team motto GPG key autoresponder: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SCO vs. ...
Quoth David A. Bandel: Anyone seen this in Cringley´s column? http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/16/24OPcringely_1.html Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$. And SCO's not even close to that big. Eew. Speaking of which, IBM reiterated their position today that their UNIX license is, irrevocable and fully paid up. The fully paid up piece caught my attention and I wondered: considering SCO's moral outrage at IBM's misappropriation of SCO's IP, when would SCO start returning IBM's licensing and royalty checks? I'm guessing Not Real Soon Now. ;-) Kurt -- Good advice is something a man gives when he is too old to set a bad example. -- La Rouchefoucauld ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SCO vs. ...
begin David A. Bandel's quote: | Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time | in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$. And SCO's not even | close to that big. my guess was that on about wednesday novell would announce that, actually, it had kept the ibm stuff, so sco was without standing there, too. | SCO reminds me more and more of the little mouse trying to suck an | elephant through a straw. my sense is that the rodent and suck parts are plenty accurate. i still believe that the rule for the plaintiff's bar should be this: lose, and the minute the jury so pronounces the lawyer is taken away to serve the sum of the amount sought and the legal expenses of the defense, both in a maximum security prison and redeemed at minimum wage, no overtime. this is the kind of tort reform that everyone who is not a member of the american trial lawyer association can live with. -- dep http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SCO vs. ...
Quoth dep: begin David A. Bandel's quote: [...] | SCO reminds me more and more of the little mouse trying to suck an | elephant through a straw. my sense is that the rodent and suck parts are plenty accurate. ;-) I just saw Nick Petreley's contribution on the subject over over at ComputerWorld. Nick used to be a big fan of Caldera. http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/story/0,10801,82138,00.html [...] Kurt -- Ask your boss to reconsider -- it's so difficult to take Go to hell for an answer. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SCO vs. ...
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:24:51 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: begin David A. Bandel's quote: | Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time | in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$. And SCO's not even | close to that big. my guess was that on about wednesday novell would announce that, actually, it had kept the ibm stuff, so sco was without standing there, too. | SCO reminds me more and more of the little mouse trying to suck an | elephant through a straw. my sense is that the rodent and suck parts are plenty accurate. i still believe that the rule for the plaintiff's bar should be this: lose, and the minute the jury so pronounces the lawyer is taken away to serve the sum of the amount sought and the legal expenses of the defense, both in a maximum security prison and redeemed at minimum wage, no overtime. this is the kind of tort reform that everyone who is not a member of the american trial lawyer association can live with. -- Yeah, but that's unfortunately a dream world. I just hope the mouse gets stepped on hard really soon so we (I'm thinking worldwide) can get back to wasting bandwidth on something more productive. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: SCO vs. ...
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:40:54 -0400 Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just saw Nick Petreley's contribution on the subject over over at ComputerWorld. Nick used to be a big fan of Caldera. http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/story/0,10801,82138,00.html [...] ROTFLMAO -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: IPSec (FreeS/WAN) anyone??
Three things. First, the freeswan to freeswan connection is the easiest I've dealt with so far. Second, I'd really recommond that you post to the freeswan list at www.freeswan.og. The developers are quite active on the list and appear to help at the slighest provacation. Third, to troubleshoot via this list, I ask for the output of ipsec auto --status on both left and right. But really, post to the freeswan list. ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
