Re: The SCO Group Closes $50 Million Equity Financing

2003-10-17 Thread burns
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 01:04, Myles Green wrote:
 $50 Million Private Investment Transaction Led by BayStar Capital
 Provides SCO With Funding for Future Software Development, SCOx Web
 Services Partnerships And Acquisitions, Future Licensing Opportunities
 and the Protection of the Company's Intellectual Property Assets
 
 http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031016/lath130_1.html
 
 freakin' SCOx suckers  :-/

A private investment group... I wonder where the capital would trace
back to, eventually?

Now for something entirely different, does anyone recall what MS intends
to use some of that $1Billion war fund for?

-- 
burns

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


RE: The SCO Group Closes $50 Million Equity Financing

2003-10-17 Thread Jack Berger
I read somewhere else that Baystar has a history of investing in companies whose prime 
focus is suing other companies over IP rights. So this must be a lucrative business. 
Afterall, it is driving up SCO stock prices.

-Original Message-
From: burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The SCO Group Closes $50 Million Equity Financing


On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 01:04, Myles Green wrote:
 $50 Million Private Investment Transaction Led by BayStar Capital...
 Future Licensing Opportunities
 and the Protection of the Company's Intellectual Property Assets
 
 http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031016/lath130_1.html
 
 freakin' SCOx suckers  :-/

A private investment group... I wonder where the capital would trace
back to, eventually?

Now for something entirely different, does anyone recall what 
MS intends
to use some of that $1Billion war fund for?

-- 
burns



___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert E. Raymond
Hi,

I'm installing Linux on a laptop for a friend - P4 1.8, 256 MB DDR, 
Radeon 7500, it's really a pretty nice laptop.

Redhat hates it, it hates Redhat (countless bugs, sound-related, 
scanning-related, PPP related, etc. both in 9.0 and I even tried the 
latest Severn and I don't feel like squashing them).  It did work just 
fine when I installed it on his desktop... but oh well.

Gentoo takes way too long (he needs it by the end of next week, max, and 
what with package downloads on dialup.. yeah right) and he's pretty much 
computer illiterate.

Mandrake just seems too Redhat-like for me, plus I'm getting unstability 
reports, but I'm willing to give it a try.

Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in 
my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years 
ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into 
stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's machine).

SuSE I'd rather not pay for, and neither would he.

Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and 
really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off 
the disk).

Any reason why I shouldn't use slackware or I should use one of the 
others I've listed (or ones I've forgotten to list?)  Ease of use after 
installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds just to 
get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the laptop), and 
fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as well).

Thanks!

Bob Raymond

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Friday 17 October 2003 12:20 pm, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm installing Linux on a laptop for a friend - P4 1.8, 256 MB DDR,
 Radeon 7500, it's really a pretty nice laptop.


How 'bout Caldera OpenLinux 3.1??;-)
(slap)

-- 
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Terence McCarthy
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

SNIP!

Rehat is too buggy.

Gentoo takes too long.

Debian leaves you with a bad taste in your mouth.

You don't want to pay for SuSE.

You also want Ease of use after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no 
workarounds just to 
get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the laptop), and fast setup are 
of main importance (oh yeah.. free as well)

Why don't you try M$ Windows? (The only problem there is you will have to pay for it- 
but then, nothing in life is free)

Terence
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I'm installing Linux on a laptop for a friend - P4 1.8, 256 MB DDR, 
 Radeon 7500, it's really a pretty nice laptop.
 
 Redhat hates it, it hates Redhat (countless bugs, sound-related, 
 scanning-related, PPP related, etc. both in 9.0 and I even tried the 
 latest Severn and I don't feel like squashing them).  It did work just
 
 fine when I installed it on his desktop... but oh well.
 
 Gentoo takes way too long (he needs it by the end of next week, max,
 and what with package downloads on dialup.. yeah right) and he's
 pretty much computer illiterate.
 
 Mandrake just seems too Redhat-like for me, plus I'm getting
 unstability reports, but I'm willing to give it a try.
 
 Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in
 
 my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years
 
 ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it
 into stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's
 machine).

Debian used to have only stable and unstable.  Now, there's testing. 
Current packages, but not bleeding edge, also not as stale as stable.

Also a few other non-official repositories have things like acrobat
reader, kde-3.1.4, etc.

 
 SuSE I'd rather not pay for, and neither would he.
 
 Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
 Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and 
 really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off 
 the disk).

Ever a good choice, but harder to keep current.  Wish list: apt-get for
slackware (slack-get?  apt-slack?  apt-ware?).

 
 Any reason why I shouldn't use slackware or I should use one of the 
 others I've listed (or ones I've forgotten to list?)  Ease of use
 after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds
 just to get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the
 laptop), and fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as
 well).
 
  Thanks!
 
  Bob Raymond
 
 
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
 http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
Nemesis Racing Team motto
GPG key autoresponder:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert E. Raymond
Terence McCarthy wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP!

Rehat is too buggy.

Gentoo takes too long.

Debian leaves you with a bad taste in your mouth.

You don't want to pay for SuSE.

You also want Ease of use after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds just to 
get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the laptop), and fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as well)

Why don't you try M$ Windows? (The only problem there is you will have to pay for it- but then, nothing in life is free)

Terence
___
That's actually what I try to tell him (gasp!) as he's really about the 
most computer-illiterate person I've ever seen.. and Windows is already 
on there... but n.. he wants Linux...

Bob Raymond

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Myles Green
I belive it was Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] who wrote:
snippage
 Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
 Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and 
 really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off 
 the disk).
 
 Any reason why I shouldn't use slackware or I should use one of the 
 others I've listed (or ones I've forgotten to list?)  Ease of use
 after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds
 just to get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the
 laptop), and fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as
 well).

It sounds like you've made your choice already. Add SWARET to keep it
(Slackware) updated and you're all set. Although, if he really is
computer illiterate you'd best make sure *everything* is set up before
turning him loose with it, otherwise you'll run the risk of turning him
off of Linux. Slackware can be hard on newbies, or so I'm told (it was
my first distro and I still use it shrug).

Or, as someone else suggested, leave Windows on it ;o)

-- 
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slackware-9.1 + XFce 4.0.0 + Sylpheed-0.9.6claws
--
Alberta Mirror for Linux-SxS.org
http://linux-sxs.org/


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert E. Raymond
David A. Bandel wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snipped



Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in

my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years

ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it
into stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's
machine).
Debian used to have only stable and unstable.  Now, there's testing. 
Current packages, but not bleeding edge, also not as stale as stable.

Also a few other non-official repositories have things like acrobat
reader, kde-3.1.4, etc.

SuSE I'd rather not pay for, and neither would he.

Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and 
really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off 
the disk).

Ever a good choice, but harder to keep current.  Wish list: apt-get for
slackware (slack-get?  apt-slack?  apt-ware?).

Honestly I don't care about *his* ability to keep it terribly current.. 
as he won't, even if it's easy (that's why I was willing to put Gentoo 
on it).  He's actually able to figure out Synaptic on the Redhat 
installation on his desktop... maybe I ought to bite the bullet and try 
Debian again...

Thanks!

Bob Raymond

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Myles Green
I belive it was David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] who wrote:

 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
 Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
  Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
  Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and
  
  really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running
  off the disk).
 
 Ever a good choice, but harder to keep current.  Wish list: apt-get
 for slackware (slack-get?  apt-slack?  apt-ware?).
snip

Try either SWARET or Slapt-get they both do an excellent job. You can
find them on freshmeat.net.

-- 
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slackware-9.1 + XFce 4.0.0 + Sylpheed-0.9.6claws
--
Alberta Mirror for Linux-SxS.org
http://linux-sxs.org/


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On Friday 17 October 2003 4:23 pm, someone claiming to be Robert E. Raymond 
wrote:
 Terence McCarthy wrote:
 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
 Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 SNIP!
 
 Rehat is too buggy.
 
 Gentoo takes too long.
 
 Debian leaves you with a bad taste in your mouth.
 
 You don't want to pay for SuSE.
 
 You also want Ease of use after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs
  (i.e. no workarounds just to get on the web to get mail- we had that with
  Redhat on the laptop), and fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah..
  free as well)
 
 Why don't you try M$ Windows? (The only problem there is you will have to
  pay for it- but then, nothing in life is free)
 
 Terence
 ___

 That's actually what I try to tell him (gasp!) as he's really about the
 most computer-illiterate person I've ever seen.. and Windows is already
 on there... but n.. he wants Linux...



A prime candidate for Lindows?
Perhaps Xandros...

-- 
RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-20.8,  KDE 3.1.4, Xfree86 4.2.1
  4:40pm  up 12 days, 18:30,  0 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Tom Wilson
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 16:23, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
 Terence McCarthy wrote:
 
 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:20:23 +
 Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 SNIP!
 
 Rehat is too buggy.
 
 Gentoo takes too long.
 
 Debian leaves you with a bad taste in your mouth.
 
 You don't want to pay for SuSE.
 
 You also want Ease of use after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no 
 workarounds just to 
 get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the laptop), and fast setup 
 are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as well)
 
 Why don't you try M$ Windows? (The only problem there is you will have to pay for 
 it- but then, nothing in life is free)
 
 Terence
 ___
 
 
 That's actually what I try to tell him (gasp!) as he's really about the 
 most computer-illiterate person I've ever seen.. and Windows is already 
 on there... but n.. he wants Linux...

You could always try one of the rookie distros.  Lycoris, Lindows, or
Xandros.  Don't have a clue of how they would do on a laptop.  

I'm actually looking into testing one of these on my brother, who is
also completely computer illiterate.  He just got an old p133 pc and
DSL.  He wants to get a new pc and I've been thinking of having him
order one of the Wal-mart specials with either Lindows or Lycoris.  But
I don't know squat about either of them so I have been putting it off.  

Good luck.


Tom Wilson 
McSwain Carpets 
513.771.1400 x124
--
The luck that is ordained for you will be coveted by others.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert E. Raymond
Myles Green wrote:

I belive it was Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] who wrote:
snippage
Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and 
really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off 
the disk).

Any reason why I shouldn't use slackware or I should use one of the 
others I've listed (or ones I've forgotten to list?)  Ease of use
after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds
just to get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the
laptop), and fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as
well).

It sounds like you've made your choice already. Add SWARET to keep it
(Slackware) updated and you're all set. Although, if he really is
computer illiterate you'd best make sure *everything* is set up before
turning him loose with it, otherwise you'll run the risk of turning him
off of Linux. Slackware can be hard on newbies, or so I'm told (it was
my first distro and I still use it shrug).
Or, as someone else suggested, leave Windows on it ;o)

Well.. He does have some Linux experience to the point that he can use 
it just like he uses Windows without fear of the thing crashing... 
SWARET looks pretty cool... if I could train him to use the command line 
(as it is he gets hung up about the domain/login stuff that appears 
before the # or $...)  He won't be turned off of the OS even though some 
people unfortunately should be.

Do you know if it's possible to use a GUI (actual GUI.. gswaret looks 
nice but it's still kinda textish) with SWARET? If you can, then 
Slackware is definitely going on there instead of Debian (as Synaptic is 
a great little tool).

Thanks

Bob Raymond

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
 A prime candidate for Lindows?
 Perhaps Xandros...

There's also Redmond Linux, or whatever they're calling it now.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread MHeinrich




I've recently tried Mandrake 9.1 - installed like a dream.  No serious bugs
yet.  The KDE setup is very different from eD2.4 (my previous distro),
especially if you try tweaking some of the preferences.  I'd definitely
give it a thumbs up overall.

Mark

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/17/2003 02:20:23 PM:

 Hi,

 I'm installing Linux on a laptop for a friend - P4 1.8, 256 MB DDR,
 Radeon 7500, it's really a pretty nice laptop.

 Redhat hates it, it hates Redhat (countless bugs, sound-related,
 scanning-related, PPP related, etc. both in 9.0 and I even tried the
 latest Severn and I don't feel like squashing them).  It did work just
 fine when I installed it on his desktop... but oh well.

 Gentoo takes way too long (he needs it by the end of next week, max, and
 what with package downloads on dialup.. yeah right) and he's pretty much
 computer illiterate.

 Mandrake just seems too Redhat-like for me, plus I'm getting unstability
 reports, but I'm willing to give it a try.

 Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in
 my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years
 ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into
 stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's
machine).

 SuSE I'd rather not pay for, and neither would he.

 Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the
 Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and
 really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off
 the disk).

 Any reason why I shouldn't use slackware or I should use one of the
 others I've listed (or ones I've forgotten to list?)  Ease of use after
 installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds just to
 get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the laptop), and
 fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as well).

 Thanks!

 Bob Raymond


 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.
 org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


--
This message (including any attachments) may contain information
which is confidential or privileged. Use, dissemination, distribution, 
or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not 
authorized and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and 
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.
--
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On Friday 17 October 2003 3:51 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
  A prime candidate for Lindows?
  Perhaps Xandros...

 There's also Redmond Linux, or whatever they're calling it now.

Lycoris. It's based on COL 3.1, isn't it?
Wasn't Joe Cheek on the Caldera list for a little while way back when?

That actually might not be a bad choice. There's a little community-based 
website on it, too, http://www.lycoris.org

Last I read about it, though, was the default desktop was KDE 2. Dunno what 
the current product is shipping with, though. And there site is conspicuously 
lacking in providing that detail

Tim

-- 
RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-20.8,  KDE 3.1.4, Xfree86 4.2.1
  4:55pm  up 12 days, 18:45,  2 users,  load average: 0.03, 0.15, 0.10
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:43:00 + Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Myles Green wrote:
 
 I belive it was Robert E. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] who wrote:
 snippage
 
 Slackware looks like my best option right now... as I've got the 
 Slackware LiveCD loaded on there right now, and it's really fast and 
 really nice looking (it's actually faster than Redhat was running off 
 the disk).
 
 Any reason why I shouldn't use slackware or I should use one of the 
 others I've listed (or ones I've forgotten to list?)  Ease of use
 after installation, lack of show-stopping bugs (i.e. no workarounds
 just to get on the web to get mail- we had that with Redhat on the
 laptop), and fast setup are of main importance (oh yeah.. free as
 well).
 
 
 It sounds like you've made your choice already. Add SWARET to keep it
 (Slackware) updated and you're all set. Although, if he really is
 computer illiterate you'd best make sure *everything* is set up before
 turning him loose with it, otherwise you'll run the risk of turning him
 off of Linux. Slackware can be hard on newbies, or so I'm told (it was
 my first distro and I still use it shrug).
 
 Or, as someone else suggested, leave Windows on it ;o)
 
 Well.. He does have some Linux experience to the point that he can use 
 it just like he uses Windows without fear of the thing crashing... 
 SWARET looks pretty cool... if I could train him to use the command line 
 (as it is he gets hung up about the domain/login stuff that appears 
 before the # or $...)  He won't be turned off of the OS even though some 
 people unfortunately should be.
 
 Do you know if it's possible to use a GUI (actual GUI.. gswaret looks 
 nice but it's still kinda textish) with SWARET? If you can, then 
 Slackware is definitely going on there instead of Debian (as Synaptic is 
 a great little tool).
 

It all depends on what you can tolerate.  

If you want easy as falling off a log, something like Mandrake is an ok
choice.  
I bit the bullet about 3.5 years ago, installed gentoo, spent several days
compiling, and haven't looked back except to experiment with the other distros. 
Upgrades are almost painless except for compile time.

Unlike your experiences, I had very good results with RedHat 7.3, although I
haven't tried the later for-pay versions. Now that apt2rpm (sp?) is available to
automate RPM stuff, you could stay up to date fairly easily.

On the other hand, for a relatively knowledgable user (aye, there's the rub), my
second choice would be Slackware. Particularly now that SWARET(sp?) is
available to automate your maintenance tasks.

Lycoris (Debian based) is supposed to be good also, but once again not free.

So the choices are free/not-free, good/sloppy, quick/slow.  You may not find an
optimal answer.

Enjoy.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Leon A. Goldstein


Bob Raymond wrote inter alia:

Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in
my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years
ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into
stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's machine).


You can download a free copy of Libranet 2.7 and try it.
No telling if it will run your sound though. Libranet 2.8/2.8.1
added ALSA.
--
Leon A. Goldstein

Powered by Libranet 2.8 Debian Linux
System LI

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert E. Raymond
Leon A. Goldstein wrote:

Bob Raymond wrote inter alia:

Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in 
my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years 
ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into 
stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's machine).

You can  download a free copy of Libranet 2.7 and try it.
No telling  if it will run your sound though.  Libranet 2.8/2.8.1 
added ALSA.

Well... Intel I810 sound works with OSS.. but one of my big gripes with 
Redhat was that it didn't have ALSA, so sound kept cutting out all the 
time at first.  I don't particularly like admin'ing his machine when I 
have a million of my own things to be doing, so since Slackware and 
Debian seem to have ALSA for free, plus from what I've read (and seen in 
the case of Debian with that ancient Potato) they seem to be really 
stable, I'll give them a try first.

Thanks tho

Bob Raymond

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Chong Yu Meng


Robert E. Raymond wrote:

Terence McCarthy wrote:

Rehat is too buggy.

I'm using Red Hat 9.0 on my laptop. I have to admit that if you're 
installing Red Hat, it can be a real pain ! The reasons are :

1. Mozilla -- If you want the latest, you will have problems with Flash 
(the one from Macromedia did not work when I tried it some months back. 
May be fixed by now though) and Java (Using Sun, Blackdown or IBM? 
Remember that for the Plug-In to work, you need the glibc 3.x compiled 
version-- that rules out IBM, and you may need to add 
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 as an environment variable)

2. KDE 3.x -- better have 512 MB RAM or more installed. Red Hat can be a 
slug if you use this. I use XFCE4 instead (but that adds a whole 
different set of problems)

3. Fonts -- yeah, it looks really crappy when you first install Red Hat. 
Better get the Subpixel font positioning thing working, or reduce the 
size till Anti-Alising doesn't kick in, but it fonts don't look jaggy or 
blurry.

All that being said, what I'm going to say may surprise you -- I'm 
actually beginning to like Red Hat. A lot ! You'll need to do a lot of 
tinkering (but that has been my experience for most Linux distros I've 
used, except for OpenLinux), and you should factor in at least 1 week to 
get it installed and tuned just so. But once you work out the kinks 
--and assuming that you've documented everything -- you can do your next 
install in under 30 minutes (Minimal install) and all the tuning and 
stuff can be finished in about 3 to 4 hours (download, install and use 
apt-get for Red Hat!). Unlike Windows 2000 Professional, which took me 
an entire DAY AND A HALF to finish installing because of all the patches 
and crap. The scary thing is, the more you patch, the slower it gets. 
Sure it's stable, but it's like watching your Pentium 4 PC degenerate to 
a 486 before your eyes as you put in patch after patch after patch.My 
laptop is running Red Hat, and even after upgrading the kernel, putting 
2 instances of Apache, one database, one app server and one IDE, it 
still works pretty fast. And it's a Celeron.

But you'll still need the 1 week familiarization with Red Hat for the 
initial install.

Regards,
pascal chong
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Robert E. Raymond
Chong Yu Meng wrote:



Robert E. Raymond wrote:

Terence McCarthy wrote:

Rehat is too buggy.

I'm using Red Hat 9.0 on my laptop. I have to admit that if you're 
installing Red Hat, it can be a real pain ! The reasons are :

1. Mozilla -- If you want the latest, you will have problems with 
Flash (the one from Macromedia did not work when I tried it some 
months back. May be fixed by now though) and Java (Using Sun, 
Blackdown or IBM? Remember that for the Plug-In to work, you need the 
glibc 3.x compiled version-- that rules out IBM, and you may need to 
add LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 as an environment variable)

Yup, I see this.  I didn't have any problem getting the 1.4 RPM from 
rawhide working on either the laptop or the destkop, but he still 
doesn't have java on his desktop ;)

2. KDE 3.x -- better have 512 MB RAM or more installed. Red Hat can be 
a slug if you use this. I use XFCE4 instead (but that adds a whole 
different set of problems)

I'm all for using XFCE myself on a slower machine, but he's used to KDE 
so I'm forced to give him that.  GNOME would be ok, but he uses KPPP (I 
can't change too much or he'll be phoning me daily-  how do i do this, 
how do I do that).  His desktop is very fast with KDE and Redhat because 
I insisted he get 512 MB of RAM.  He's being cheap right now, not to 
mention he lacks time to get more for the laptop.

3. Fonts -- yeah, it looks really crappy when you first install Red 
Hat. Better get the Subpixel font positioning thing working, or reduce 
the size till Anti-Alising doesn't kick in, but it fonts don't look 
jaggy or blurry.

Believe it or not, the fonts looked great! Maybe it's the 1400x1050 res. 
tho...

All that being said, what I'm going to say may surprise you -- I'm 
actually beginning to like Red Hat. A lot ! You'll need to do a lot of 
tinkering (but that has been my experience for most Linux distros I've 
used, except for OpenLinux), and you should factor in at least 1 week 
to get it installed and tuned just so. But once you work out the kinks 
--and assuming that you've documented everything -- you can do your 
next install in under 30 minutes (Minimal install) and all the tuning 
and stuff can be finished in about 3 to 4 hours (download, install and 
use apt-get for Red Hat!). Unlike Windows 2000 Professional, which 
took me an entire DAY AND A HALF to finish installing because of all 
the patches and crap. The scary thing is, the more you patch, the 
slower it gets. Sure it's stable, but it's like watching your Pentium 
4 PC degenerate to a 486 before your eyes as you put in patch after 
patch after patch.My laptop is running Red Hat, and even after 
upgrading the kernel, putting 2 instances of Apache, one database, one 
app server and one IDE, it still works pretty fast. And it's a Celeron.

Yah.. XP is pretty darn slow on both his machines... fast on mine.. but 
then I'm better at keeping it running smoothly and not installing 
everything in sight when I get a new piece of low quality hardware 
because it's cheap (oh yeah, don't do that either, no wonder I don't 
have all sorts of bugs cropping up).

But you'll still need the 1 week familiarization with Red Hat for 
the initial install.

Well.. I'm having my father download Slackware on Monday when he gets 
back to his high speed connection at work... Debian I'd do, but I can't 
figure out which CDs I truly need and there are 9! to choose from.

Thanks!

Bob Raymond

Regards,
pascal chong




___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Leon A. Goldstein


Bob Raymond wrote:

Leon A. Goldstein wrote:

> Bob Raymond wrote inter alia:
>
>>Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in
>>my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years
>>ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into
>>stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's machine).
>>
>
> You can download a free copy of Libranet 2.7 and try it.
> No telling if it will run your sound though. Libranet 2.8/2.8.1
> added ALSA.
>
Well... Intel I810 sound works with OSS.. but one of my big gripes with
Redhat was that it didn't have ALSA, so sound kept cutting out all the
time at first. I don't particularly like admin'ing his machine when I
have a million of my own things to be doing, so since Slackware and
Debian seem to have ALSA for free, plus from what I've read (and seen in
the case of Debian with that ancient Potato) they seem to be really
stable, I'll give them a try first.

Thanks tho

Bob Raymond


Libranet 2.7 set up sound during installation on my P4 box, also
with i810 sound.
You can always gor the Knoppix route too.
--
Leon A. Goldstein

Powered by Libranet 2.8 Debian Linux
System LI

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
 Lycoris (Debian based) is supposed to be good also, but once again not free.

Unless they really changed direction, Lycoris is based on Caldera, not
Debian.

-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote:
  1. Mozilla -- If you want the latest, you will have problems with
  Flash (the one from Macromedia did not work when I tried it some
  months back. May be fixed by now though) and Java (Using Sun,
  Blackdown or IBM? Remember that for the Plug-In to work, you need the
  glibc 3.x compiled version-- that rules out IBM, and you may need to
  add LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 as an environment variable)
 
 Yup, I see this.  I didn't have any problem getting the 1.4 RPM from
 rawhide working on either the laptop or the destkop, but he still
 doesn't have java on his desktop ;)

A word of warning.  Redhat's mozilla RPMs are a PoS.  They do some truly
evil unintuitive things with mouse text highlighting that will slowly
drive you mad.  I ended up removing their mozilla altogether, and
installing the official binary tarball.

  3. Fonts -- yeah, it looks really crappy when you first install Red
  Hat. Better get the Subpixel font positioning thing working, or reduce
  the size till Anti-Alising doesn't kick in, but it fonts don't look
  jaggy or blurry.
 
 Believe it or not, the fonts looked great! Maybe it's the 1400x1050 res.
 tho...

Fonts in RH9 are gorgeous, or at least ISO-8859-1.  Perhaps the asian
charsets aren't anti-aliased like the western ones?


-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:39:19 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
  Lycoris (Debian based) is supposed to be good also, but once again not free.
 
 Unless they really changed direction, Lycoris is based on Caldera, not
 Debian.
 

Yeah, that was a brain fart: I meant libranet.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:35:58 -0400 Leon A. Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Bob Raymond wrote:
 
  Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
 
   Bob Raymond wrote inter alia:
  
  Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in
  my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years
  ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into
  stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's machine).
  
  
   You can  download a free copy of Libranet 2.7 and try it.
   No telling  if it will run your sound though.  Libranet 2.8/2.8.1
   added ALSA.
  
  Well... Intel I810 sound works with OSS.. but one of my big gripes with
  Redhat was that it didn't have ALSA, so sound kept cutting out all the
  time at first.  I don't particularly like admin'ing his machine when I
  have a million of my own things to be doing, so since Slackware and
  Debian seem to have ALSA for free, plus from what I've read (and seen in
  the case of Debian with that ancient Potato) they seem to be really
  stable, I'll give them a try first.
 
  Thanks tho
 
  Bob Raymond
 
 
 Libranet 2.7 set up sound during installation on my P4 box, also with
 i810 sound.
 You can always gor the Knoppix route too.
 

Having once tried true debian myself (what a POS), I have to agree with Leon. 
If you want debian, get libranet.  The other possibility is to install from
KNOPPIX and then upgrade.  I did this once, and it was ok.

But then, as you already said, Slack will do nicely

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:35:58 -0400 Leon A. Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Bob Raymond wrote:
 
  Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
 
   Bob Raymond wrote inter alia:
  
  Debian... I'm also willing to try it... but I just have a bad taste in
  my mouth after the last time I tried it (though that was several years
  ago- I just hated having to wait for up to date versions to make it into
  stable, which I'm definitely going to be using on someone else's machine).
  
  
   You can  download a free copy of Libranet 2.7 and try it.
   No telling  if it will run your sound though.  Libranet 2.8/2.8.1
   added ALSA.
  
  Well... Intel I810 sound works with OSS.. but one of my big gripes with
  Redhat was that it didn't have ALSA, so sound kept cutting out all the
  time at first.  I don't particularly like admin'ing his machine when I
  have a million of my own things to be doing, so since Slackware and
  Debian seem to have ALSA for free, plus from what I've read (and seen in
  the case of Debian with that ancient Potato) they seem to be really
  stable, I'll give them a try first.
 
  Thanks tho
 
  Bob Raymond
 
 
 Libranet 2.7 set up sound during installation on my P4 box, also with
 i810 sound.
 You can always gor the Knoppix route too.
 

One final shot on this.  Leon, I know you have used libranet for a long time. 
Does libranet get around the debian stable = hopelessly antequated problem
pretty well, i.e. relatively current packages are available?

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Ken Moffat
Collins Richey wrote:

One final shot on this.  Leon, I know you have used libranet for a long time. 
Does libranet get around the debian stable = hopelessly antequated problem
pretty well, i.e. relatively current packages are available?

 

I'll second Leon's Libranet recommendation. And Yes, the packages in 
Libranet 2.8/2.8.1 are quite up to date. They base it on 'testing' now, 
with many 'unstable' packages included. (Not that they are unstable, 
just from the unstable branch).

And if you get the freebie, 2.7, you can always change the 
/etc/apt/sources.list file to reflect the testing or unstable branch and 
go at it, updating the whole thing if you want to. (but careful, you can 
screw things up totally sometimes) Those who don't like debian should 
look at Libranet, which has a good install and is up to date, with a 
bunch of good users on a forum and mailing list.

--
Ken


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


yet another .pdf question

2003-10-17 Thread dep
i have a very long pdf file, several pages of which i would like to be 
able to save to a separate pdf file. i can find no way of doing this 
without buying very expensive software. does anyone know of a way to do 
this? acrobat reader has no provision for it that i can find, and for 
some reason the linux pdf tools shipped with suse 8.2 are capable of 
opening no pdf file, from any source, that i can find.

thanks.
-- 
dep

Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: yet another .pdf question

2003-10-17 Thread Net Llama!
You could always print the pages to postscript, and then open it with
ghostview.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, dep wrote:

 i have a very long pdf file, several pages of which i would like to be
 able to save to a separate pdf file. i can find no way of doing this
 without buying very expensive software. does anyone know of a way to do
 this? acrobat reader has no provision for it that i can find, and for
 some reason the linux pdf tools shipped with suse 8.2 are capable of
 opening no pdf file, from any source, that i can find.

 thanks.


-- 
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step  TyGeMo  http://netllama.ipfox.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: yet another .pdf question

2003-10-17 Thread dep
quoth Net Llama!:
| You could always print the pages to postscript, and then open it with
| ghostview.

that i have done. i've even used ps2pdf to make the resulting file into 
a .pdf. but the thing has big black bands across every page when opened 
with acrobat. the whole purpose is to make it portable, and .ps isn't 
as portable as .pdf is.
-- 
dep

Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:57:29 -0700 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Collins Richey wrote:
 
 
 One final shot on this.  Leon, I know you have used libranet for a long time.
 
 Does libranet get around the debian stable = hopelessly antequated problem
 pretty well, i.e. relatively current packages are available?
 
   
 
 
 I'll second Leon's Libranet recommendation. And Yes, the packages in 
 Libranet 2.8/2.8.1 are quite up to date. They base it on 'testing' now, 
 with many 'unstable' packages included. (Not that they are unstable, 
 just from the unstable branch).
 
 And if you get the freebie, 2.7, you can always change the 
 /etc/apt/sources.list file to reflect the testing or unstable branch and 
 go at it, updating the whole thing if you want to. (but careful, you can 
 screw things up totally sometimes) Those who don't like debian should 
 look at Libranet, which has a good install and is up to date, with a 
 bunch of good users on a forum and mailing list.
 
 

Thanks for the additional info.  If you get the paid-up version, does libranet
provide updates from time to time to keep you up to date, or do you have to
monitor the debian sites to find out what's going on?

The primary reason I stick with gentoo is the ease of updating.  A few times a
week, I run 'emerge sync' (update the list of available packages) and 'emerge
-pu world' (list the new stable updates that are available based on what I have
installed).  Is that type of operation easy on libranet/debian?

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: yet another .pdf question

2003-10-17 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:17:29 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 quoth Net Llama!:
 | You could always print the pages to postscript, and then open it with
 | ghostview.
 
 that i have done. i've even used ps2pdf to make the resulting file into 
 a .pdf. but the thing has big black bands across every page when opened 
 with acrobat. the whole purpose is to make it portable, and .ps isn't 
 as portable as .pdf is.
 -- 

Bummer!  OpenOffice allows you to create a pdf, but you can't read one!

You might try http://www.pdf995.com/ on a WinBlast machine to convert the file
to .doc or something else.  It looks like there is a free version.

-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Ken Moffat
Collins Richey wrote:

Thanks for the additional info.  If you get the paid-up version, does libranet
provide updates from time to time to keep you up to date, or do you have to
monitor the debian sites to find out what's going on?
They do provide some packages, but mostly the available updates are 
debian packages. They did update a bunch for version 2.8.1, and it was a 
free upgrade from 2.8. Pretty up to date packages.

The primary reason I stick with gentoo is the ease of updating.  A few times a
week, I run 'emerge sync' (update the list of available packages) and 'emerge
-pu world' (list the new stable updates that are available based on what I have
installed).  Is that type of operation easy on libranet/debian?
This is comparable to 'apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade' which grabs 
all new packages from whichever branch you are aimed at. Libranet uses 
testing (sarge), plus their own repository.

--
Ken


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: I need a distro recommendation!

2003-10-17 Thread Tom Wilson
On Friday 17 October 2003 05:49 pm, Collins Richey's voice rose above 
the ones in my head and stated:

 So the choices are free/not-free, good/sloppy, quick/slow.  You may
 not find an optimal answer.

Kinda like the old you can get it good and fast but it ain't gonna be 
cheap.  You can get it fast and cheap, but it ain't gonna be good.  You 
can get it cheap and good,  but it ain't gonna be fast.

-- 
Tom Wilson
Reg. Linux user# 199331


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Irritating Spam/Worm(?)

2003-10-17 Thread Chong Yu Meng
Hi All,

Ever since I posted a message to the Smallville newsgroup (yes, I watch 
that stuff. If you didn't grow up watching Christopher Reeve as Superman 
and Lynda Carter as Wonder Woman, well, you wouldn't understand), I've 
been getting a lot of spam mail. As I am on a Linux machine, the 
attachment (Content type is audio/x-midi; name=henn.exe, but the 
filename varies, though the EXE extension does not) does nothing. 
However, it displays an intriguing little grey square in the email message.

The message body typically says that a message was undeliverable. The 
originating and terminating addresses are bogus. I have 2 questions:

1. How do I track down the origin of the mail ? I'm just curious as to 
what other people do when they want to track down these mails.
2. Does anybody know what the attachment does? Some links to computing 
resources would help, though I find some of the sites so verbose as to 
be next to useless. Anything for the lay person?

Regards,
pascal chong


___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users