Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-31 Thread Becky Bruce

I think we need to hold off on this particular patch for a few days.   
I took a look at the manual section you're referencing here, and sure  
enough, it says that you shouldn't set both bits in the same mtspr  
instruction.  The manual says this in more than one place, in fact.   
However, that seemed a little bit odd to me, so I talked with a few  
of the hardware designers for the 745x family.  They assure me that  
the manual statement is false.  The normal code that sets ICE/ICFI/ 
DCE/DCFI all on one mtspr should be fully functional on this  
processor family.  I'm still working on confirming this and getting  
some history on *why* the manual says that, but for now I'd say it's  
a pretty good bet that the manual is in error.  I will let you know  
if I find out this is not the case.

You are correct, though, in that an isync is needed prior to the  
write of HID0[ICE]. It's probably missing because it's not listed in  
the synchronization table in chapter 2 of the manual.

For what it's worth, as soon as I can confirm this, I will make sure  
the publications team here at Freescale is made aware of the error so  
it can be corrected in the next printing of the manual.  I will also  
have the synchronization table updated as it also has incorrect  
information.

Thanks,
B




Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-30 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:15:14PM +0200, Roger Larsson wrote:
 Is the patch reversed?

Sure looks like it.

 diff -Naur old new  patch
 
 And what about comments, are they all still valid?
 enable and invalidate caches is now only Data cache...
 
 In cases when I am writing code like this I try to
 include the reason why it is not optimized together
 in one write... (or soon someone will do that optimization).

Good point.

 /RogerL

Also, please send the patches *inline*.

Mark



Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-29 Thread Assaf Hoffman
Hi,
Attached...

-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:35 AM
To: Assaf Hoffman
Cc: Mark A. Greer; linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org; Rita Shtern; Ronen
Shitrit
Subject: Re: Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:55:46PM +0300, Assaf Hoffman wrote:
 Attached.
 Thanks.

Er, how about a *patch* place inline (as in, not as an attachment).

Thanks,

Mark
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cpu_setup_6xx.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: cpu_setup_6xx.patch
Url : 
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060529/2ee2c98c/attachment.obj
 


Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-29 Thread Roger Larsson
Is the patch reversed?

diff -Naur old new  patch

And what about comments, are they all still valid?
enable and invalidate caches is now only Data cache...

In cases when I am writing code like this I try to
include the reason why it is not optimized together
in one write... (or soon someone will do that optimization).

/RogerL



Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-29 Thread Assaf Hoffman
Hi,
Attached...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+hoffman=marvell.com at ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of Roger Larsson
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:15 PM
To: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction
Importance: Low

Is the patch reversed?

diff -Naur old new  patch

And what about comments, are they all still valid?
enable and invalidate caches is now only Data cache...

In cases when I am writing code like this I try to
include the reason why it is not optimized together
in one write... (or soon someone will do that optimization).

/RogerL
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cpu_setup_6xx.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1114 bytes
Desc: cpu_setup_6xx.patch
Url : 
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060529/e6954d51/attachment.obj
 


Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-23 Thread Assaf Hoffman
Attached.
Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:00 PM
To: Assaf Hoffman
Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org; Rita Shtern; Ronen Shitrit
Subject: Re: Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:39:13PM +0300, Assaf Hoffman wrote:
 Hi,
 I think the implementation of setup_common_caches() in file
 cpu_setup_6xx.S; not according to the spec as far as MPC74xx concerns.
 Looking in the spec (MPC7450 RISC Microprocessor Family Reference
 Manual, MPC7450UM Rev. 5 1/2005) section 3.4.1.5 L1 Instruction and
Data
 Cache Flash Invalidation it says: 
 Note that HID0[ICFI] and HID0[DCFI] must not both be set with the
same
 mtspr instruction, due to the synchronization requirements described
in
 Section 2.4.2.4.1, Context Synchronization.
 But in the code those two do set together.
 Also, the same section says: 
 An isync must precede the setting of the HID0[ICFI] in order for the
 setting to take effect.
 But in the code, only 'sync' can be found.
 
 /* Enable caches for 603's, 604, 750  7400 */
 setup_common_caches:
   mfspr   r11,SPRN_HID0
   andi.   r0,r11,HID0_DCE
   ori r11,r11,HID0_ICE|HID0_DCE
   ori r8,r11,HID0_ICFI
   bne 1f  /* don't invalidate the D-cache
 */
   ori r8,r8,HID0_DCI  /* unless it wasn't enabled */
 1:sync
   mtspr   SPRN_HID0,r8/* enable and invalidate caches
 */ 
   ^^^ Here we set both ICFI and DCFI in the same
 mtspr instruction. Also, no isync before setting ICFI.
   sync
   mtspr   SPRN_HID0,r11   /* enable caches */
   sync
   isync
   blr
 
 Please advice.
 Thanks.

Yep, looks like a bug.  How about a patch?  :)

Mark
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cpu_setup_6xx.S
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10964 bytes
Desc: cpu_setup_6xx.S
Url : 
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060523/f995b3b6/attachment.obj
 


Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-23 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:55:46PM +0300, Assaf Hoffman wrote:
 Attached.
 Thanks.

Er, how about a *patch* place inline (as in, not as an attachment).

Thanks,

Mark



Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-15 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:39:13PM +0300, Assaf Hoffman wrote:
 Hi,
 I think the implementation of setup_common_caches() in file
 cpu_setup_6xx.S; not according to the spec as far as MPC74xx concerns.
 Looking in the spec (MPC7450 RISC Microprocessor Family Reference
 Manual, MPC7450UM Rev. 5 1/2005) section 3.4.1.5 L1 Instruction and Data
 Cache Flash Invalidation it says: 
 Note that HID0[ICFI] and HID0[DCFI] must not both be set with the same
 mtspr instruction, due to the synchronization requirements described in
 Section 2.4.2.4.1, Context Synchronization.
 But in the code those two do set together.
 Also, the same section says: 
 An isync must precede the setting of the HID0[ICFI] in order for the
 setting to take effect.
 But in the code, only 'sync' can be found.
 
 /* Enable caches for 603's, 604, 750  7400 */
 setup_common_caches:
   mfspr   r11,SPRN_HID0
   andi.   r0,r11,HID0_DCE
   ori r11,r11,HID0_ICE|HID0_DCE
   ori r8,r11,HID0_ICFI
   bne 1f  /* don't invalidate the D-cache
 */
   ori r8,r8,HID0_DCI  /* unless it wasn't enabled */
 1:sync
   mtspr   SPRN_HID0,r8/* enable and invalidate caches
 */ 
   ^^^ Here we set both ICFI and DCFI in the same
 mtspr instruction. Also, no isync before setting ICFI.
   sync
   mtspr   SPRN_HID0,r11   /* enable caches */
   sync
   isync
   blr
 
 Please advice.
 Thanks.

Yep, looks like a bug.  How about a patch?  :)

Mark



Setting ID cache enable in the same mtspr instruction

2006-05-08 Thread Assaf Hoffman
Hi,
I think the implementation of setup_common_caches() in file
cpu_setup_6xx.S; not according to the spec as far as MPC74xx concerns.
Looking in the spec (MPC7450 RISC Microprocessor Family Reference
Manual, MPC7450UM Rev. 5 1/2005) section 3.4.1.5 L1 Instruction and Data
Cache Flash Invalidation it says: 
Note that HID0[ICFI] and HID0[DCFI] must not both be set with the same
mtspr instruction, due to the synchronization requirements described in
Section 2.4.2.4.1, Context Synchronization.
But in the code those two do set together.
Also, the same section says: 
An isync must precede the setting of the HID0[ICFI] in order for the
setting to take effect.
But in the code, only 'sync' can be found.

/* Enable caches for 603's, 604, 750  7400 */
setup_common_caches:
mfspr   r11,SPRN_HID0
andi.   r0,r11,HID0_DCE
ori r11,r11,HID0_ICE|HID0_DCE
ori r8,r11,HID0_ICFI
bne 1f  /* don't invalidate the D-cache
*/
ori r8,r8,HID0_DCI  /* unless it wasn't enabled */
1:  sync
mtspr   SPRN_HID0,r8/* enable and invalidate caches
*/ 
  ^^^ Here we set both ICFI and DCFI in the same
mtspr instruction. Also, no isync before setting ICFI.
sync
mtspr   SPRN_HID0,r11   /* enable caches */
sync
isync
blr

Please advice.
Thanks.