Re: [pfSense] SIP / Asterisk / PFSense - need to reset states of port 5060 connections

2013-01-10 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 09.01.2013 09:16, schrieb mayak-cq:

On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 08:38 +0100, Jürgen Echter wrote:

snip

suddenly it occurs that we are no more available from external and i
have to reset states from port 5060 from our internal server to our sip
provider.

after that its working again.

where can i look for this really annoying problem?

hi jurgen

hmmm -- i have the same issue -- thought it was unique to my install.

using embedded 2.01 on an Alix appliance with an openvpn tunnel to a 
remote pfsense running full version (then to an asterisk server)



cheers

m


___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Hi,

we just use NAT (Port Forwarding) to access the ports on our server.

Im really interested how others solve this kind of trouble??

Thanks

Juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


[pfSense] Packages are being installed in the background (pfSense 2.0.1)

2012-02-24 Thread Jürgen Echter

Hi,

i had to re-setup my firewall and restored my config. all went well so 
far, but i can't edit anything because i have on every screen a pic 
which says 'packages are being reinstalled in the background'. this is 
on since a few hours.


squid isn't started and there are a message when i open the config page 
of squid.


Warning: fopen(/usr/local/pkg/squid.xml): failed to open stream: No such 
file or directory in /etc/inc/xmlparse.inc on line 175


and

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in 
/usr/local/www/pkg_edit.php on line 423


is there a way to recover this? firewall is up and running (and also 
working the right way, all vlans everything, except squid)


thanks

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Packages are being installed in the background (pfSense 2.0.1)

2012-02-24 Thread Jürgen Echter

i'd like to add that in Filter Reload Status window i have

Checking for nat PF hooks in package /usr/local/pkg/lightsquid.inc...

is it possible to manually reinstall squid/lightsquid?

cheers.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Packages are being installed in the background (pfSense 2.0.1)

2012-02-24 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 24.02.2012 14:37, schrieb Jürgen Echter:

is it possible to manually reinstall squid/lightsquid?

ok, i managed to pkd_delete lightsquid.

the i tried to pkg_add -r lightsquid to install it again.

the result is:

pkg_add -r squid
Error: Unable to get 
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/squid.tbz: 
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)


i've seen that there is no packages-8.1-release dir on the queried ftp

maybe this is the problem?

uname -r
8.1-RELEASE-p6

greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Packages are being installed in the background (pfSense 2.0.1)

2012-02-24 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 24.02.2012 14:55, schrieb Jürgen Echter:

Am 24.02.2012 14:37, schrieb Jürgen Echter:

is it possible to manually reinstall squid/lightsquid?

ok, i managed to pkd_delete lightsquid.

the i tried to pkg_add -r lightsquid to install it again.

the result is:

pkg_add -r squid
Error: Unable to get 
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/squid.tbz: 
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)


i've seen that there is no packages-8.1-release dir on the queried ftp

maybe this is the problem?

uname -r
8.1-RELEASE-p6

greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

ok, fixed that by entering

setenv PACKAGESITE 
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-8.1-release/Latest/


in pfSense shell.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Setting up an Access Point with Dlink DWL-G122 USB

2012-02-02 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 02.02.2012 10:08, schrieb Bart Grefte:


Okay :)

Hmm, so you did not use InSSIDer? That program picks up a lot more 
networks than the standard wireless tools available in Windows (or any 
other OS I believe).


If InSSIDer is not able to find it, then you're AP is most likely not 
active for some reason.


*Van:*list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org 
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] *Namens *Jürgen Echter

*Verzonden:* donderdag 2 februari 2012 9:20
*Aan:* list@lists.pfsense.org
*Onderwerp:* Re: [pfSense] Setting up an Access Point with Dlink 
DWL-G122 USB


Hi,

sure its not hidden ;)

also i tried an Android App and my Netbook if it finds my network, no way.

so i'll digg in the logs.

see you

Am 01.02.2012 20:33, schrieb Bart Grefte:

Have you maybe set the SSID to be hidden? Can't direct you to the 
exact location of the setting since I currently do not use pfSense but 
it should be on the page with al de Access Point related settings.



What you can try is run InSSIDer on a computer with wifi, see if it 
finds you're wireless network.


What you can also try is checking pfSense's logs, see if anything 
wifi-related pops up in there.


*Van:*list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org 
mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org 
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] *Namens *Jürgen Echter

*Verzonden:* woensdag 1 februari 2012 19:36
*Aan:* list@lists.pfsense.org mailto:list@lists.pfsense.org
*Onderwerp:* [pfSense] Setting up an Access Point with Dlink DWL-G122 USB

Hi,

i'm trying to set up an AP with my Dlink DWL-G122.

Im as far as:

- setting up the device as ap
- ifconfig -a shows the device

*WLAN interface (run0)*

*Status*



up

*MAC address*



f0:7d:68:69:d6:b1

*IP address*



192.168.1.1

*Subnet mask*



255.255.255.0

*Media*



autoselect mode 11g hostap

*Channel*



6

*SSID*



test234

*In/out packets*



0/0 (0 bytes/0 bytes)

*In/out packets (pass)*



0/0 (0 bytes/0 bytes)

*In/out packets (block)*



0/0 (0 bytes/0 bytes)

*In/out errors*



0/0

*Collisions*



0


but i don't see any test234 network?!?!

where could i have a look?

greetings and thanks

juergen

  
  
___

List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org  mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list



Ok, here we go :)

System Log Firewall:

Feb 2 21:55:24hostapd: run0_wlan0: WPA rekeying GTK

System Log System:

Feb 2 21:55:10kernel: ugen1.2: Ralink at usbus1 (disconnected)
Feb 2 21:55:10kernel: run0: at uhub1, port 2, addr 2 (disconnected)
Feb 2 21:55:15kernel: ugen1.2: Ralink at usbus1
Feb 2 21:55:15kernel: run0: Ralink 11g Adapter, class 0/0, rev 
2.00/1.01, addr 2 on usbus1
Feb 2 21:55:15kernel: run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 
(MIMO 1T1R), address f0:7d:68:69:d6:b1

Feb 2 21:55:15kernel: run0: firmware RT2870 loaded

and the inSSIDer thing isn't working here, not working with wine and no 
windows around. sorry.


greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


[pfSense] Setting up an Access Point with Dlink DWL-G122 USB

2012-02-01 Thread Jürgen Echter

Hi,

i'm trying to set up an AP with my Dlink DWL-G122.

Im as far as:

- setting up the device as ap
- ifconfig -a shows the device

WLAN interface (run0)
Status  up
MAC address f0:7d:68:69:d6:b1
IP address  192.168.1.1
Subnet mask 255.255.255.0
Media   autoselect mode 11g hostap
Channel 6
SSIDtest234
In/out packets  0/0 (0 bytes/0 bytes)
In/out packets (pass)   0/0 (0 bytes/0 bytes)
In/out packets (block)  0/0 (0 bytes/0 bytes)
In/out errors   0/0
Collisions  0


but i don't see any test234 network?!?!

where could i have a look?

greetings and thanks

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Block Rule doesnt work

2012-01-27 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 25.01.2012 20:13, schrieb David Burgess:

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Moshe Katzmo...@ymkatz.net  wrote:


He said he can access web pages so it's not even rejecting TCP.


Thanks. I missed that.

Jürgen, are you using a transparent proxy, like squid? I believe this
will bypass your firewall rules for ports and interfaces that it
listens on.

db
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

hi,

yes it seems that transparent squid was causing this problem.

would it be a good idea to use 'Do not forward traffic to Private 
Address Space (RFC 1918) destination through the proxy server but 
directly through the firewall.' in the settings?


greets and thanks

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Block Rule doesnt work

2012-01-25 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 25.01.2012 16:26, schrieb Moshe Katz:
Try using Source: * (any) instead of Source: WLAN Net.  It will 
only apply to WLAN traffic anyway because of which interface it 
applies to.


It would be helpful for you to send the screenshot again WITH the 
left-most column - the icons OUTSIDE the table.  Make sure your rules 
are actually block rules (red icons) and that they are enabled.


I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question but did you make sure 
your IP address is not the one that is allowed through in the first rules?


Moshe

--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net mailto:mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732 tel:%2B1%28301%29867-3732



2012/1/25 Jürgen Echter j.ech...@echter-kuechen-elektro.de 
mailto:j.ech...@echter-kuechen-elektro.de


Am 24.01.2012 12:58, schrieb Matthias May:

Jürgen Echter wrote:

Hi,

maybe i'm doing something wrong.

i have 3 interfaces, one for wan, one for lan and one for
wlan.

i don't want that wlan users have access to my lan.

so i tell the firewall rule on the LAN interface to block
everything from WLAN subnet, but i'm still able to receive
different webpages hosted on the LAN.

also i tried to tell the WLAN interface to block
everything what has my LAN as destination, same effect.

what's wrong?

greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Firwall rules go to the interface on which traffic is received.
So if you want to block traffic from the WLAN interface to the
LAN interface, then the rule has to go to the WLAN interface.
Rules are processes from top to bottom and if a rule catches
the rest below is no longer considered.
Meaning if you have an allow rule above your block rule, the
allow rule will always catch.
Put your block rules all the way to the top.

If that doesn't help, send a screenshot of your rules.
(Overview, not the configuration of the rule itself).

Greetings
Matthias May
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


ok, here's a screenshot from my rules.

i want to block / reject access from wlan to lan.

if i try from a box in the wlan to access a webpage from lan it
just works. thats what i don't want :)

greets.

___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list



___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Hi,

yes i'm sure it's not the one i added there. The IP i added is reserved 
for my little eeePC.


imho if i have wlan subnet as source it should be blocked, because im 
coming from wlan subnet.


greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


[pfSense] Block Rule doesnt work

2012-01-24 Thread Jürgen Echter

Hi,

maybe i'm doing something wrong.

i have 3 interfaces, one for wan, one for lan and one for wlan.

i don't want that wlan users have access to my lan.

so i tell the firewall rule on the LAN interface to block everything 
from WLAN subnet, but i'm still able to receive different webpages 
hosted on the LAN.


also i tried to tell the WLAN interface to block everything what has my 
LAN as destination, same effect.


what's wrong?

greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


[pfSense] AVM Fritz WLAN Stick and pfSense 2.0

2011-12-31 Thread Jürgen Echter

Hi,

has anyone ever succesfully connected a AVM Fritz WLAN USB-Stick to 
pfSense (for AP purposes)?


working drivers for this stick are ar9170usb and carl9170.

greets

juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] (Re-)Creating SSL Certificate for WebGUI on PfSense 2.0

2011-12-30 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 30.12.2011 16:00, schrieb Jürgen Echter:

Hi,

could one explain me how to (re-)add a self signed cert for the webgui?

I'd like to have a personalized one, and longer retention.

Greets and a happy new year.
--
 Mit freundlichen Grüssen

Jürgen Echter


___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


ok, i've got it.

create a new cert -- change in advanced tab GUI ssl cert to the new one.

thanks :)
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] Unable to check for updates.

2011-12-25 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 25.12.2011 06:52, schrieb Mike Spooner:


I have that too but if I type that url into a browser I get a 404 - 
Not Found page. I downloaded the 2.0.1 image and did a manual upgrade.


But on a similar note, on my gui Dashboard under Version in the System 
Information widget, I see Unable to check for updates.  This is with 
Nano i386 2.0.1 and I saw the same thing with 2.0. Do I need to tell 
it where to look for updates or do I need to create a rule to allow it 
to look for updates or do I just ignore that message?




On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Moshe Katz wrote:


Here's what I have: http://updates.pfsense.org/_updaters
Moshe

--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732



2011/12/24 Przemys?aw Pawe?czyk pp...@o2.pl
  On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:46:04 +0100
  Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:

 You people with i386 2.0.1, what do you have in your
 Firmware Auto Update URL field?

Nothing, as nothing works. Use Manual Upgrade d/loading from one the
mirror sites: http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=updates

I used Fleximus website but only RELEASE was accepted by my pfsense:
pfSense-Full-Update-2.0.1-RELEASE-i386.tgz

(I have been upgrading from 2.0.0.)

Regards
Przemys?aw Pawe?czyk


___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list





___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Hi,

i have also http://updates.pfsense.org/_updaters as URL and currently im 
downloading via the update function version 2.0.1 (from 2.0.0)


Cheers
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] SIP client fails after a few days

2011-11-02 Thread Jürgen Echter

Am 02.11.2011 12:26, schrieb Hans Maes:

On 11/02/2011 06:03 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Craig Drownli...@sussol.net  wrote:

Hi,
we have a Linksys/Sipura SIP client behind pfSense 2 on an Alix board.
Usually after about a week we can no longer make calls.
Clearling pfSense states or a reboot fixes it, whereas a reboot of 
the Sipura box makes no difference, so it's something with pfSense.

Couldn't see anything in the logs.
Any ideas?

What do the states look like?

Tons of 2.0 boxes out there with VoIP behind them, including all ours,
definitely not a widespread issue.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


There was an issue like this on pfsense 1.2.3 when you have a dynamic 
DSL WAN IP address, and your ISP forces a DSL disconnect and IP renew 
every few days.

Not sure if this is fixed in 2.0 ?

Basically, when your WAN IP changes the NAT states with the old WAN IP 
are not cleared from the state table.
The SIP device looses its connection and starts reconnecting every 20 
orso seconds as defined in the SIP protocol.
This keeps the old state alive, and therefore it keeps using the 
incorrect old NAT'ed WAN IP.


Again, this may be fixed in 2.0 but I have not tested that.
In 1.2.3 there was a quickfix in some package that cleared SIP states 
on a WAN DHCP renew.


More info: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,18053.0.html

Regards,

Hans
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Hi,

we had a similar issue, we solved it by setting firewall optimizations 
to conservative.


greetings

Juergen
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list