Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt

Tee G.Peng wrote:

Philip,

On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Nikita The Spider wrote:


Tee,
There is no such thing as a .li element; I assume you mean li.


That was for people who read email in HTML mode :)


That's not how HTML mail works.  Just let the mail clients handle 
encoding the messages properly, you never need to manually include 
workarounds like that.


--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-16 Thread tee


On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:


Tee G.Peng wrote:

Philip,
On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Nikita The Spider wrote:


Tee,
There is no such thing as a .li element; I assume you mean li.

That was for people who read email in HTML mode :)


That's not how HTML mail works.  Just let the mail clients handle  
encoding the messages properly, you never need to manually include  
workarounds like that.


I read from other list that it's one of the net etiquette to always  
do so whenever  you include markup in your post, so that people who  
read in html mode can read the markup. Even so, I always forgot to do  
this.


tee


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-14 Thread Anders Nawroth


Tee G.Peng:

Is it legal to place a div in .li?


You'll find the answers to such questions here:

http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/
http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/lists/li.html

If you learn to read DTD:s the same information is in them.
Here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/dtds.html#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Strict
you can find this line:
!ELEMENT li %Flow;
in the DTD, that states that %flow; goes inside li, and following the 
link from %flow; provides this information:

!ENTITY % Flow (#PCDATA | %block; | form | %inline; | %misc;)*

A tutorial on DTD writing/reading can be found here:
http://www.w3schools.com/dtd/


/AndersN


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-14 Thread Matt Heerema
Was I not told  by Mike from green-beast don't blindly rely on  
automated validator the other day! :)


I believe that was in regard to accessibility?  Unless I wasn't  
reading closely enough.


The HTML validator has a few bugs, but I think you are safe in this  
situation.


Unless I am mistaken, one of the only things you need to consider in  
cases like this is that you don't nest a block level element inside  
an inline element.


li's are considered block level, no?

I think you're good.

matt
www.directsteps.com


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] div in li

2006-07-13 Thread Tee G.Peng

Hi,
Is it legal to place a div in .li?

Something like this

.lix
div it does validate/div
/li


I am using XHTML 1.0 strict doctype and it doesn't show validate  
error, also, the WAI validation from content quality site doesn't  
give me warning or error, but I feel so uncertain about it.


If you must know why I place a div tag inside the li tag - it's from  
the PVII image gallery script for adding description. The div tag is  
generated by the gallery script.


Thanks!

tee


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-13 Thread Al Sparber

From: Tee G.Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is it legal to place a div in .li?

Something like this

.lix
div it does validate/div
/li


I am using XHTML 1.0 strict doctype and it doesn't show validate 
error, also, the WAI validation from content quality site doesn't 
give me warning or error, but I feel so uncertain about it.


If you must know why I place a div tag inside the li tag - it's from 
the PVII image gallery script for adding description. The div tag is 
generated by the gallery script.


We're legal, Tee :-)

--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling 
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday.







**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-13 Thread Nikita The Spider

On 7/13/06, Tee G.Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,
Is it legal to place a div in .li?

Something like this

.lix
div it does validate/div
/li


Tee,
There is no such thing as a .li element; I assume you mean li. If
that's the case, then yes, it is OK to put a div inside li.
Besides, if the W3C validator said it was OK, isn't that more
convincing than the comments of someone like me who you've never even
heard of?  =)

--
Philip
http://NikitaTheSpider.com/
Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-13 Thread Tee G.Peng


On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Al Sparber wrote:




We're legal, Tee :-)



Ah, sorry, I should have trust in you :)

tee


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] div in li

2006-07-13 Thread Nikita The Spider

On 7/13/06, Tee G.Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK, perhaps I should rephrase my question.
Is there no semantical reason that it's not quite legal to do so? You
must forgive me asking this seemingly stupid question; the heated
Alphabetical Listing Buttons thread did make me think twice how to
use proper markup.


Ah, well, now there's a question that we can argue about!  =)

Seriously, IMHO it's fine, in general. (In general meaning I'm sure
someone will take this as a challenge to devise an example that's not
fine, but I can't think of one offhand.)

--
Philip
http://NikitaTheSpider.com/
Whole-site HTML validation, link checking and more


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**