Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-22 Thread Charles Eaton


On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:28 AM, David Dorward wrote:

Invisible text is hard to read against any background colour, and  
you can't depend on images being loaded. This thread started  
because of issues with alt text on image maps not showing up when  
images weren't there.


... that will teach me to read the whole thread!
Have a look in my sandbox, i think i found a solution. http:// 
www.eatons.net/sandbox/no-map.html


The OBJECT model

Two ref's: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#edef-OBJECT
http://www.htmlhelp.org/reference/html40/special/object.html

It tested well in Firefox and Opera on the Mac (Note: OK, but not as  
well in Safari???)

I don't know how it handles on Explorer in Windows???

-chuck


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-21 Thread David Dorward

Charles Eaton wrote:

http://www.eatons.net/sandbox/no-map.html


I doubt that http://dorward.me.uk/tmp/fake-image-map.png is the effect 
you are after.



background-image: url(callforentries.gif);
color:transparent;


Invisible text is hard to read against any background colour, and you 
can't depend on images being loaded. This thread started because of 
issues with alt text on image maps not showing up when images weren't there.



dl
dtCall for entries 2007 Mississippi Gulf Coast Addy Awards /dt
dd class=onea href=#1Enter Now To Win /a/dd
dd class=twoa href=#2Contest Rules Click Here To Read More 
/a/dd
dd class=threea href=#3View All Of The Current Entries 
/a/dd

/dl


Now those really aren't definitions of that term.


--
David Dorward   http://dorward.me.uk/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-21 Thread Al Kendall

only a few validation issues...  Failed validation, 210 errors in the new
site with 191 in the old one



On 2/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello list,

I am in a desperate state. I am working for a .com.au and they are
struggling with some of the more forward-thinking web development
features that are around...

Please take a look at www.cataloguecentral.com.au

If you think it is poorly programmed, take a look at what it used to be
(2 months ago):
www.cataloguecentral.com.au/default5.asp

I am trying my hardest to drag this business into 2007 but there is
solid resistance

Unfortunately, Catalogue Central have received some poor advice in the
past and seem to still be receiving poor advice now.

The issue at the moment is to do with the red drop down list/menu at
the top left hand corner of the site

People here want to expand the menu so that the contents of each list
are printed down under each heading. Your thoughts pleaseIt's
alright if you think the same way but I think a drop down menu, in this
case, runs rings around the alternative

Thanks for your thoughts.

Christian Fagan.
Fagan Design.
www.fagandesign.com.au




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--
Cheers!

Al Kendall


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-21 Thread Tim
I work so hard to have all pages validated XHTML 1.0 Strict and AAA 
accessible.


Thanks for that 210 validation errors. Really gross. Any of my real 
pages validate, I feel so cheated apart for the loss of income, the 
defacement of W3C standards I try to hold high.


My beloved authors would be distraught and embarrassed to see the 
errors and all loss of formatting.
This is an abomination on any artist. Thanks Al I am waiting a bit 
before changing it to the graphic, just biding my time.


Tim

On 21/02/2007, at 8:25 PM, Al Kendall wrote:

only a few validation issues...  Failed validation, 210 errors in the 
new site with 191 in the old one




On 2/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I am in a desperate state. I am working for a .com.au and they are
struggling with some of the more forward-thinking web development
features that are around...

Please take a look at www.cataloguecentral.com.au

If you think it is poorly programmed, take a look at what it used to 
be

(2 months ago):
www.cataloguecentral.com.au/default5.asp

I am trying my hardest to drag this business into 2007 but there is
solid resistance

Unfortunately, Catalogue Central have received some poor advice in the
past and seem to still be receiving poor advice now.

The issue at the moment is to do with the red drop down list/menu at
the top left hand corner of the site

People here want to expand the menu so that the contents of each list
are printed down under each heading. Your thoughts pleaseIt's
alright if you think the same way but I think a drop down menu, in 
this

case, runs rings around the alternative

Thanks for your thoughts.

Christian Fagan.
Fagan Design.
 www.fagandesign.com.au




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--
Cheers!

Al Kendall
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

The Editor
Heretic Press
http://www.hereticpress.com
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-20 Thread Patrick Bruno
I was wondering if anyone knew anything about the standards use of the map
and area tags (like I'm doing here on the 2007 image of the left column:
http://www.heliosdg.com/mgcaf/)? I did some testing by turning images off in
IE7 and Firefox but the alt tag data doesn't appear. Does that mean screen
readers can't find the information? Would it be best to provide a tags
below the mapped image in case the image doesn't load? I also googled for
web standards and the map  area tags but didn't come up with much.

Regards,
 
Patrick Bruno
Art Director
Helios Design Group/JM Digital Corporation
John C. Stennis Space Center
Building 1210, Suite 116
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
ph: 228-688-2522
cell: 601-425-4059
fax: 228-688-1566
www.heliosdg.com
www.jmdigicorp.com




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-20 Thread David Dorward
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:32:15 -, Patrick Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


I was wondering if anyone knew anything about the standards use of the  
map and area tags (like I'm doing here on the 2007 image of the left  
column: http://www.heliosdg.com/mgcaf/)? I did some testing by turning  
images off in IE7 and Firefox but the alt tag


Attribute!

data doesn't appear. Does that mean screen readers can't find the  
information?


No (which is not to say that they can either), but it does mean that  
people using those browsers with images disabled (Gosh, bandwidth on  
Vodafone is expensive, I'll turn images off) will have problems.


http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/mapalt.html is a good document on the  
subject.



--
David Dorward
  http://dorward.me.uk/ - Freshly redesigned


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-20 Thread Charles Eaton

W3C says: try to avoid server-side image maps [xhtml]

a better setup (IMHO), is to use a definition list,
drop your image in the background of the dl, giving it the image size,
use dt and 3 dd's in a two row setup to overlay the image.
add text [no display] and links, ... your in business.
-chuck
==
On Feb 20, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Patrick Bruno wrote:

I was wondering if anyone knew anything about the standards use of  
the map
and area tags (like I'm doing here on the 2007 image of the left  
column:




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-20 Thread David Dorward
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:36:18 -, Charles Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


I was wondering if anyone knew anything about the standards use of the  
map and area tags (like I'm doing here on the 2007 image of the  
left column:



W3C says: try to avoid server-side image maps [xhtml]


If it is using area elements, then its a client side image map.


a better setup (IMHO), is to use a definition list,
drop your image in the background of the dl, giving it the image size,
use dt and 3 dd's in a two row setup to overlay the image.
add text [no display] and links, ... your in business.


Suffers from the usual problems of FIR. i.e. No alt text if images are  
disabled and no content screen readers can get to.


It also uses the rather dubious practise of having of a definition list as  
a generic key/values list.


Also, I don't understand what content you expect to put in the term and  
what values you expect to put in the descriptions.


--
David Dorward
  http://dorward.me.uk/ - Freshly redesigned


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



ADMIN: THREAD CLOSED Re: [WSG] Site Issue - opinions please

2007-02-19 Thread Lea de Groot
Hi guys,

This thread doesn't seem to be on topic - perhaps a design list would 
be more appropriate?
If you need help getting a drop down (etc) to work, we're here for you, 
but what sort of design element to use isn't on topic.
Sorry!

Any further responses should go straight to Christian

warmly,
Lea
-- 
Lea de Groot
Core Group Member

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:24:46 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The issue at the moment is to do with the red drop down list/menu at 
 the top left hand corner of the site
 
 People here want to expand the menu so that the contents of each list 
 are printed down under each heading. Your thoughts pleaseIt's 
 alright if you think the same way but I think a drop down menu, in 
 this case, runs rings around the alternative


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***