another test
this is the final test -- Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
Re: another test
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: this is the final test No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league. L. I've got a touch of the singles. Shingles? No, singles.
Test of sorts
Since I've changed my mail setup I've had a bit of a problem with resending the bounced mails - hopefully this will prove that I fixed it :) You shouldnt be seeing any spurious [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: headers in this ... /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe Analyst/Programmer Netscalibur UK Tel: 0870 887 8841 - Fax: 0870 887 8867 http://www.netscalibur.co.uk -- Email disclaimer: This can be viewed at http://www.netscalibur.co.uk/email.html
test
just a test -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Re: test
Greg McCarroll wrote: just a test Sorry, didn't arrive in Germany. You have some kind of UK only filter on these things? Please sent it again, with the filter turned off. Cheers, Philip (feeling testy) -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Re: Test
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:57:08PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than Lookout. ;-) [ ~/.mailcap ]-- text/html; /usr/bin/lynx %s; nametemplate=%s.html text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput [ ~/.muttrc ]--- set mailcap_path=~/.mailcap auto_view text/html This is great, thanks! Is it possible to get it to do this *only* when the email is content-type: text/html; rather than displaying it instead of the text/plain in a multipart/alternative? Pass, I'm afraid. Another mutt question: How do you send To: a whopping list of recipients? It's a nightmare copy/pasting on a single line. I ended up editing the headers with E (on the final page) and reading the recip.'s in from a file. Seems laborious. Umm, I find that editing my headers with the message makes the most sense: set edit_headers Then, you can do things like: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ie: indent all following lines, ala RFC822. -Dom
Re: Test
Quoting Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This is great, thanks! Is it possible to get it to do this *only* when the email is content-type: text/html; rather than displaying it instead of the text/plain in a multipart/alternative? Yeah, you set it up in .muttrc : auto_view text/html application/msword alternative_order text/enriched text/plain text set mailcap_path="~/.mutt-mailcap:~/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap" My .mutt-mailcap looks like this : # Try w3m first text/html; cathtml.sh %s; copiousoutput # Send html to a running netscape by remote text/html; netscape -remote 'openURL(%s)'; test=RunningNetscape # Else use lynx to view it as text text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput text/*; cat %s ; copiousoutput application/msword; catdoc; copiousoutput application/postscript; ps2ascii %s; copiousoutput And loads more for images and stuff. Especially catdoc is a godsend. Oh, my cathml.sh looks like this : #!/bin/sh eval `resize`; w3m -T text/html -cols $COLUMNS -dump $1; On the risk of offending the person who gets really tired of the w3m-is-better meme, I prefer w3m because I get send so many tables in html, they show up real nice. Cheerrs, -- Merijn Broeren| Nothing is more poignant in old age than the Software Geek | memory of temptation resisted. |
Re: Test
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Merijn Broeren wrote:
# Else use lynx to view it as text
text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput
Quick question for us non mutt users that may one day consider using
it. Does this run throgh the shell? And what's %s in this? I'm kinda
hoping it's not able to be '; rm -rf ~/*' or worse, if you get my drift
Later.
Mark.
--
print "\n",map{my$a="\n"if(length$_6);' 'x(36-length($_)/2)."$_\n$a"} (
Name = 'Mark Fowler',Title = 'Technology Developer' ,
Firm = 'Profero Ltd',Web = 'http://www.profero.com/' ,
Email = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Phone = '+44 (0) 20 7700 9960' )
Re: Test
Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Feature request - IMAP client. Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a spare second. (Yeah, right.) There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly (until I finally get round to writing Mail::Cclient::Simple) but does EVERYTHING (POP3, IMAP, NNTP, and Mbox if I ever get round to M::C::S) almsot transparently. Oh and it does on the fly MIME decoding and fast so you don't need to leave nasty temporary files lying around when munging.
Re: Test
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :( -- Sendmail may be safely run set-user-id to root. -- Eric Allman, "Sendmail Installation Guide"
Re: Test
Simon Cozens wrote: On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :( Yeah, tell me about it. hence the idea of Mail::Cclient::Simple
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than Lookout. ;-) [ ~/.mailcap ]-- text/html; /usr/bin/lynx %s; nametemplate=%s.html text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput [ ~/.muttrc ]--- set mailcap_path=~/.mailcap auto_view text/html This is great, thanks! Is it possible to get it to do this *only* when the email is content-type: text/html; rather than displaying it instead of the text/plain in a multipart/alternative? Another mutt question: How do you send To: a whopping list of recipients? It's a nightmare copy/pasting on a single line. I ended up editing the headers with E (on the final page) and reading the recip.'s in from a file. Seems laborious. Paul
Test
Title: Test Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* Darren Newbie Loser
Re: Test
Clarke, Darren wrote: Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* I agree. Your mail server lost again. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* Darren Newbie Loser You don't get away from a Newbie without learning though. Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than Lookout. ;-) [ ~/.mailcap ]-- text/html; /usr/bin/lynx %s; nametemplate=%s.html text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput [ ~/.muttrc ]--- set mailcap_path=~/.mailcap auto_view text/html -Dom
Test from uuencode boy
BDY.RTF Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. People with broken mail clients may disagree :-) .robin. -- select replace(a, CHR(88), replace(a,,'')) from ( select 'select replace(a, CHR(88), replace(a,,)) from ( select ''X'' a from dual)' a from dual)
Re: Test from uuencode boy
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. thats perfect as far as i'm concerned (mutt user) -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. People with broken mail clients may disagree :-) I have a non-broken client which copes with multipart/alternative and I still disagree. For a text message the text part carries all the information, and the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. Nicholas Clark -- ENOJOB: http://plum.flirble.org/~nick/CV.html
Re: Test from uuencode boy
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: Test from uuencode boy test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Snip I recieved that one as the usual signature main body, with 2 attachments this time, one plain text signature (again), and an attatched rtf file with the main body.. Outlook express (until I can get my adsl online with linux) Gareth Harper
Re: Test from uuencode boy
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, you wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. works for me .. theres stuff I dont need, but since it identifies whats what in the headers I can read it fine in Kmail -- Robin Szemeti The box said "requires windows 95 or better" So I installed Linux!
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? :-) .robin. (reads london-pm with the 'D' key) -- Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!
Re: Test from uuencode boy
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Okay, you have a 17-line corporate .signature. This means that every post from you must contain at least 17 lines of Perl/Buffy-related discussion or you'll get killfiled ;-) Surely s/you/that address/ ? And as I would assume that it's mandatory that anything coming from an ubsw.com address has that sort of disclaimer on it, wouldn't it be easier to obtain an address outside ubsw.com so that you can avoid having the disclaimer in the first place? Otherwise at least 17 lines of on-topic discussion per message is going to unacceptably increase the signal to noise on this list, I'd guess. Nicholas Clark -- ENOJOB: http://plum.flirble.org/~nick/CV.html
Re: Test from uuencode boy
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Your message looks like this : I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.4K] I 2 |-no description[text/plain, quoted, ISO-8859-1, 1.1K] I 3 +-no description [multipa/mixed, 7bit, 1.9K] A 4 |-BDY.RTF [applica/rtf, base64, 0.5K] I 5 +-Legal Disclaimer [text/plain, 7bit, us-ascii, 0.9K] Amazing powers of obfuscation in Outlook. -- Merijn Broeren| My hat to keep the Martian brain rays out works just fine. Software Geek | It's really *good* tin foil. | And stop staring at me like that.
Re: Test
* at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? doesn't eveyone archive all their mail? *some* of it *might* be useful at some point. and it's not like disk space is at a premium these days struan
Re: Test from uuencode boy
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Sort of - pine seems to prefer the disclaimer over the body of the message as an alternative part but I have just installed it and the configuration may be shagged ... /J\
Re: Test
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: * at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? doesn't eveyone archive all their mail? *some* of it *might* be useful at some point. and it's not like disk space is at a premium these days Er, yes I believe I have on sundry 'pooteys around here the entire life history of London.pm /J\
Re: Test
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: However, it's more all these *** job agencies sending me things in multi-crap that I'm shifting home over a modem to read at home. scp -C is good at making things smaller, but not as good as not having crap in the first place. If it's just an ordinary Unix mailbox, may I suggest Mail::Audit? Feature request - IMAP client. MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 8980 5714 (Home) http://colondot.net/ Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 7956 613942 (Mobile) What passes for woman's intuition is often nothing more than man's transparency. -- George Nathan
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Feature request - IMAP client. Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a spare second. (Yeah, right.) -- We *have* dirty minds. This is not news. - Kake Pugh
Re: Test
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. Don't bother. If it was worth saying, it was worth saying properly. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ This is a signature. There are many like it but this one is mine. ** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your message is important **
Mail::ListDetector - please test
Hi. I have an (as yet unreleased) module called Mail::ListDetector, which takes a Mail::Internet object, and attempts to tell you if the message involved was posted to a mailing list, and if so, attempts to get some details about that list. I need testers - in particular, see if it builds and passes tests for you, and throw lots of messages at the sample script and see if you can get it to be inaccurate for any of them. If you can, please send me the message in question. (if you don't want to give out the content, just headers should do). Currently it should know about majordomo, smartlist, ezmlm, and mailman, although the majordomo and smartlist guessers are a bit experimental. It's at: http://www.etla.org/Mail-ListDetector-0.05.tar.gz Michael
