[LUTE] Re: Universale
I recently ordered strong trebles from Mimmo Peruffo. The ones that Mimmo says are as strong as nylon. If I recall corectly, on a 60cm G lute they can stand being tuned up to higher C. They have not been available for the last year or so, but they are now back in stock. I have only had them on my lute for a week so I can't state for certain that they have the same durability as Unversale strings, but I would expect that to be so. They tuned up exceptionally quickly, and there after needed very little retensing. They also seem very true, but are perhaps brighter than Kathedrale, although, the initial brightness softens slightly, or you get used to it quickly. Kathedrale last about two months which is quite good really, and they do have a mellow sound. However, my lute playing neighbour, however, actually preferred this one to Kathedrale, saying he very much liked their clarity. So it is also a question of personal taste, and playing expectation. He told me he liked a treble to stand out and have a strong sound. I checked with Mimmo as to whether they were generally available, and he told me they are now standard from 38 to 48. Of course some string sellers may still be stocking the previous strings so you could check with them, or order them directly from Mimmo. I agree that the loaded strings are expensive, but to my mind worth the effort (as Daniel implies) especially for an 11c lute, where thicker basses are a real problem. Gimped are good, but quite bright, and probably better on a dark larger bodied 13c lute, unless you want to try half wound on these. Anthony Le 25 nov. 08 à 04:43, Daniel Winheld a écrit : They are not dedicated to lute- they simply make BY FAR the strongest, most durable treble strings I have ever used - in my case, a pair of .42 mm (perfectly true and in tune with each other) that I put on my vihuela, a close copy of the Chambure artifact by Harris Barber. Got them in June, and only this past week is one of them beginning to shred. That is the only string I get for the lute from them; as they are expensive. I did get three strings for my bass viol, very good on that instrument too. I imagine that they would be useful for courses all the way down to the 4th octaves, but the expense does not justify it- and for sound, those durable trebles are not quite as sweet as the more delicate strings. No free lunch! -Anyway, I have no issues or complaints about courses from the second on down that I get from the dedicated lute string specialists. Except the ungodly price of Mimmo's current line up of loaded strings; but the trouble it takes him to make one they are by no means overpriced. As I told Ed Martin, check the Universale home page carefully for the sentence that says they can indeed make strings as thin as 0.36 mm. That's thin.-Dan I checked Universale's website, do they have lute strings? I saw strings only for bowed instruments... -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- Rachel Winheld 820 Colusa Avenue Berkeley, CA 94707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel 510.526.0242 Cell 510.915.4276
[LUTE] Re: was something, now vinyl
At 01:43 PM 11/24/2008, you wrote: I love vinyl. Lasts forever, too. does not, degrades with every play. Depends on how, and if you play it. Shelf life is longer than CDs, most CDs start degrading after a few years. Does USB limit the bandwidth? Dont see any other reason for a USB TT to be inferior. It's not about bandwidth. It's stereo, so there are no bandwidth issues. (unless you have quad LPs) The cheap USB turntables sound bad, and this has to do with the quality of the turntable and the inexpensive AD components in the input stage as welll as in the amplifier stage. Expensive ones sound better, but then you could get a professional quality interface that you can use for recording lute instead, and use it with your turntable. The RME box has a turntable input as well as line inputs. 3. If you can't deal with the whole tracking force thing, get a P mount model. Easy to deal with. provided you can get stylii. Used to be Radio Shack carried em all, and lots of audio specialty stores caried technics and other good cartridges with replacement stylii. Used to be. Easy to get. Widely available. http://www.needledoctor.com/ 5. If your records are chatty natty, they need to be cleaned. Nitty Gritty record cleaners for this for this, the one with the vacuum. Some hifi stores will do this for a few cents. I recall ultrasonic clearners and special fluids, stuff which might stand a chance of dealing with the kind of oil rgeasy soot typical of new york city and other places where coal is(was) burned for power generation. Physical contact is a nono with vinyl of course. Nitty Gritty good. Extensively tested, widely used, sterophile recommended If you have a cartridge that takes one you can find available on the market. Finding, best to stock up, keep in mind the lifetime of a good stylus, 100 hours of play is what I recall, but that might have been for saphire, hopefully longer for diamond, especially since industrial diamonds are pretty cheap now. Widely available, relatively long lasting, but if you are mastering, you need it only once per disk. If you have something you really want some extra care applied to, record it twice, and edit back and forth to get the best tracking. I have heard that Vinyl has a memory, play leaves it temporarily distorted. Supposed to wait an hour between playings to let it recover. Might be that ambient temperature has an effect on this too. EQ normally is not necessary. However, if you wish to jazz up the sound, record the master untouched, then apply effects to a separate file. Apply all effects using a minimum 24 bit master. If you Turntable has rumble you should get one that doesnt. Place it on a massive table which is vibration-isolated to minimize the effect of outside vibrations (street traffic, sonic booms, gallomping children) Rumble can come through the air, and if it does, it will rumble. The sound waves can be picked up by the tonearm, are a combination of any of the frequency sensitive parts. If your floor is vibrating, it will be difficult to make a good transfer as the air will vibrate as well. Some turntables, even high quality ones, simply rumble internally. You want your take-off to be as close to a master as you can get it. If any of the audio cables are long they should be large in size to maximize signal strength. Short cables are a good idea. Don't spend more than a dollar per foot. Belden digital cable has very low capacitance; Canare, Mogami and Gepco are also good. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Material for sight reading.
I play from the grand staff in Ness's edition, I first mark any differences to the tab, then cut and paste them--fewer page turns. The parts are very nicely realized in the transcription. dt At 06:39 PM 11/24/2008, you wrote: Hi, all, I just checked, and yes, Mr. Ness's old Francesco edition does have grand staff, as do all of the old Corpus des Luthistes Francais volumes from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. (Ballard 12, Bocquet, Morlaye, etc.) Good luck, Guy! Best to all, and keep playing, Chris. Guy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/24/2008 5:10 PM There's a lot of guitar transcriptions out there, if guitar staff is OK. If you need grand staff, a couple that come immediately to mind are the Kanazawa Holborne, and the Ness Francesco volumes (I think Arthur included a grand staff version with that edition, but I don't have a copy myself). -Original Message- From: Herbert Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:01 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Material for sight reading. What is a good way to get a quantity of sight-reading material in the keys of C, F, and G? I need modern staff notation (not tablature), like modern-day piano music. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Universale
I had a long conversation with Mimmo at last week's exhibition in London. One of the things we discussed was strong trebles: he said (if I understood him right) that ALL these higher tensile gut strings are made by the same Italian manufacturer who sells them to various retailers. Incidentally, an earlier email about Universale strings and responses is to be found in the archives. Ref below. Note that beef (bull?) gut is mentioned. Gut strings - 'Universale corde musicali' Friday, 24 August, 2007 4:10 PM -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] ok...need some more help...
For the past few weeks I'm trying to write,tabs. becuase I'm a mac user, i pretty much have nothing... I can use Finale 2009, Sibelius 5 or Guitar pro. but they all pretty much the same bad thing. I can run XP, but: Fronimo: Can't save (and don't have money to buy...) Django (same as above) I haven't tried the app by Cripps yet, it's really hard for me to work at a terminal environment right now (sick as a little puppy) I need it both for lute and maybe a voice or two. for now i use Finale, but it's really really make me even sicker! Any help or advice or maybe some pills will be great... Omer To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Universale
I doubt whether Mimmo gets them from someone else. He had been waiting to find a particular type of gut, so as to be able to make these again; and if I understood correctly, this same gut would allow him to improve the very smallest loaded strings, below say, about D-10 on an 11c lute. I know Mimmo makes these himself. He is an experimental string maker, he is even about to experiment on new types of synthetics. I think that nylgut had to be made elsewhere under contract from Mimmo, because until recently he did not have an extrudor. What I have understood, is that Univerale makes strings for a number of other companies, perhaps Baroco, and La Folia, but don't quote me on that. That does not necessarily mean they are identical, they might be made to specification. Therefore if there are strong trebles in all three companies, they may be made by the same company, and I would guess that would be Universale. I am only going from what I have read on Mimmo's pages, and on the explanations that he has kindly given me, in particular about his research into loaded strings, and his recent attempts to improve the smallest loaded strings. Anthony Le 25 nov. 08 à 09:36, Martyn Hodgson a écrit : I had a long conversation with Mimmo at last week's exhibition in London. One of the things we discussed was strong trebles: he said (if I understood him right) that ALL these higher tensile gut strings are made by the same Italian manufacturer who sells them to various retailers. Incidentally, an earlier email about Universale strings and responses is to be found in the archives. Ref below. Note that beef (bull?) gut is mentioned. Gut strings - 'Universale corde musicali' Friday, 24 August, 2007 4:10 PM -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: bosnische brad pitt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-8-RiLJa7Y RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: bosnische brad pitt [Scanned]
Nah, A chubby Raymond Blanc or a tidy Russell Brand ;-) -Original Message- From: Roman Turovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 November 2008 14:36 To: Lutelist Subject: [LUTE] Re: bosnische brad pitt http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-8-RiLJa7Y RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: was something, now vinyl
The best thing for cleaning some records- even alleviating small scratches- is Vick's Vaporub. Doesn't seem to work as well if the recorded music is post 18th century, however... so if it ain't Baroque, don't Vicks it. 5. If your records are chatty natty, they need to be cleaned. Nitty Gritty record cleaners for this for this, the one with the vacuum. Some hifi stores will do this for a few cents. I recall ultrasonic clearners and special fluids, stuff which might stand a chance of dealing with the kind of oil rgeasy soot typical of new york city and other places where coal is(was) burned for power generation. Physical contact is a nono with vinyl of course. Nitty Gritty good. Extensively tested, widely used, sterophile recommended -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: was something, now vinyl
Daniel wrote: The best thing for cleaning some records- even alleviating small scratches- is Vick's Vaporub. Doesn't seem to work as well if the recorded music is post 18th century, however... so if it ain't Baroque, don't Vicks it. Ow, ow, ow! Enough Earth man, I'll tell you anything you want to know. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Universale
I've just received this message from Universale, what about the prices in comparison with other string makers? --- - Thanks for the message. The requested gauges can be available and the prices are as follows (export prices) 120 cm length BV 42 and BV 50 5,20 EUR SN 64 6,90 EUR SN 80 8,30 EUR CB 64 7,90 EUR BC 80 9,50 EUR 180 cm length BV 42 and BV 50 7,80 EUR SN 64 10,35 EUR SN 80 12,45 EUR CB 64 11,85 EUR BC 80 14,25 EUR Kind regards, Marco Ternovec -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: You Tube/Vimeo Question
Try letting the video completely upload before clicking Play... Rob 2008/11/25 Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] All, When I click on the links to You Tube and Vimeo lute videos provided in the posts (and all other posts on those sites, as well), they invariably play, but with some brief sputtering in the audio accompanied by a freeze in the video at odd moments during the performance. What causes that? How can I get rid of it? My computer is an IBM Pentium III laptop running XP. My internet is DSL. Thanks! Steve -- To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Material for sight reading.
Out of curiosity, all ye to read from this edition or Arthur himself, how do the grand staff versions handle octave basses? Thanks, Eugene At 03:29 AM 11/25/2008, David Tayler wrote: I play from the grand staff in Ness's edition, I first mark any differences to the tab, then cut and paste them--fewer page turns. The parts are very nicely realized in the transcription. dt At 06:39 PM 11/24/2008, you wrote: Hi, all, I just checked, and yes, Mr. Ness's old Francesco edition does have grand staff, as do all of the old Corpus des Luthistes Francais volumes from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. (Ballard 12, Bocquet, Morlaye, etc.) Good luck, Guy! Best to all, and keep playing, Chris. Guy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/24/2008 5:10 PM There's a lot of guitar transcriptions out there, if guitar staff is OK. If you need grand staff, a couple that come immediately to mind are the Kanazawa Holborne, and the Ness Francesco volumes (I think Arthur included a grand staff version with that edition, but I don't have a copy myself). -Original Message- From: Herbert Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:01 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Material for sight reading. What is a good way to get a quantity of sight-reading material in the keys of C, F, and G? I need modern staff notation (not tablature), like modern-day piano music. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Informal performing situations.
In the past year or two, steel-string acoustic guitarists have begun playing at night on the Univ of Texas campus, sitting on various steps and walls. Do we have any way to guess what our historical lutenist predecessors would have thought of performing so informally? To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Material for sight reading.
Christopher Stetson 11/25/2008 5:59 PM Hi, Good question, Eugene. There is no indication of octave stringing in any staff notation that I know of, just the fundamental note. I never thought about it, since I played the tablature. I don't think, however, that the practice in and of itself qualifies the transcribers as fundamentalists. I think that Dana hinted at what I always assumed was the reason: the assumption among the Americans and the French appears to have been that a scholarly researcher should be able to play the music on the piano. There were only a few people who had John Ward's demonstrated ability to realize all sorts of tablature directly to the keyboard. The German and English editions seemed to favor guitar transcriptions, if I recall correctly. It was, by the way, a real pain. I spent hours writing pieces out by hand to avoid the page turns in all but the shortest pieces. It could result in the preservation of the Stetson Lute Book (ca. 1985), though! Further there were, or at least it felt like there were, a lot fewer lute enthusiasts back then, and we were less concerned with those kinds of details. Even in the small venues I played, people would still approach you after the concert and ask, what's that instrument you were playing? Perhaps Arthur can clarify this? Best to all, and keep playing Chris. Eugene C. Braig IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/25/2008 5:21 PM Out of curiosity, all ye to read from this edition or Arthur himself, how do the grand staff versions handle octave basses? Thanks, Eugene At 03:29 AM 11/25/2008, David Tayler wrote: I play from the grand staff in Ness's edition, I first mark any differences to the tab, then cut and paste them--fewer page turns. The parts are very nicely realized in the transcription. dt At 06:39 PM 11/24/2008, you wrote: Hi, all, I just checked, and yes, Mr. Ness's old Francesco edition does have grand staff, as do all of the old Corpus des Luthistes Francais volumes from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. (Ballard 12, Bocquet, Morlaye, etc.) Good luck, Guy! Best to all, and keep playing, Chris. Guy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/24/2008 5:10 PM There's a lot of guitar transcriptions out there, if guitar staff is OK. If you need grand staff, a couple that come immediately to mind are the Kanazawa Holborne, and the Ness Francesco volumes (I think Arthur included a grand staff version with that edition, but I don't have a copy myself). -Original Message- From: Herbert Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:01 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Material for sight reading. What is a good way to get a quantity of sight-reading material in the keys of C, F, and G? I need modern staff notation (not tablature), like modern-day piano music. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Universale
Dear Martyn and Daniel and all I think there may have been a lot of background noise during your conversation with Mimmo, and I think I have understood roughly the cause of the confusion. In fact, what Mimmo must have said was that one family of gut string makers was providing all these strong strings for Universale, La Folia, and Baroco, and that is the Toro Brothers (The Toro family are from the city of Salle, province of Pescara in the region of Abruzzo, Italy). This has nothing to at all to do with the strong strings made by Mimmo himself.. When Mimmo mentioned 'Toro, you may have understood the related word tauro (bull), possibly the meaning of the name. You then perhaps thought that Mimmo was referring to the material from which the strings were made: made from tauro, rather than by Toro. The Toro brothers use indifferently beef and ram. (perhaps not actually ram, possibly mutton, but I am not sure about that. Ram strings are brown simply because they do not use peroxides on it, while they do use it on the beef gut. Mimmo's strings are usually semi-rectified, but this may not be the case with the Toro brother's strings. Also Mimmo's strong strings are unvarnished, just oiled. This might not be the case with the Toro either. Perhaps Daniel can enlighten us on this last point, as he is using them. Best wishes Anthony Le 25 nov. 08 à 09:36, Martyn Hodgson a écrit : I had a long conversation with Mimmo at last week's exhibition in London. One of the things we discussed was strong trebles: he said (if I understood him right) that ALL these higher tensile gut strings are made by the same Italian manufacturer who sells them to various retailers. Incidentally, an earlier email about Universale strings and responses is to be found in the archives. Ref below. Note that beef (bull?) gut is mentioned. Gut strings - 'Universale corde musicali' Friday, 24 August, 2007 4:10 PM -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html --
[LUTE] Re: Informal performing situations.
I'm sure there will be better documented replies, but I think the many visual images of people playing music informally outdoors would indicate that, at least as an idea, they would have thought fairly highly of it. I suspect from my own personal anecdotal evidence, though, that the difficulties of dealing with weather, insects, and trying to get comfortable sitting on steps and walls, not to mention difficulties of being heard, might have affected what they thought of the actuality. Again, best to all. C. Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/25/2008 5:46 PM In the past year or two, steel-string acoustic guitarists have begun playing at night on the Univ of Texas campus, sitting on various steps and walls. Do we have any way to guess what our historical lutenist predecessors would have thought of performing so informally? To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: staff realization of tablature [was Material for sight reading]
Greetings Chris et al., I'm working from flawed memory here on an issue that is only somewhat related, so please forgive me if I'm only almost right. I seem to recall Strizich assumed reentrant tuning on 5-course guitar (the A course in a strings only without bourdon) and expected modern guitarists to place a single a on their guitars (in place of the ordinary A) in his staff-notation setting of de Visee's guitar music. Unfortunately, I don't believe Strizich was always clear regarding where notes should be fingered: along a, g, or b. He also assumed an octave d-d', but I don't recall if he ever notated the upper note sounded along the d course. The result was a score that was not really readable on sight, but rather required a little preparation and planning to actually turn into music. I seem to recall some other transcriptions offering higher octaves from octave-stung courses in parentheses in addition the fundamental as a normal note, and I know of some selective approaches to single-note octave selection (either higher or lower, even lower octaves where reentrant tuning could be expected) to arrive at contiguous line or logical counterpoint where the intended octave is unclear or shifts within a passage along an octave-strung course. Any other approaches or thoughts on their pros and cons? Best, Eugene At 06:05 PM 11/25/2008, Christopher Stetson wrote: Christopher Stetson 11/25/2008 5:59 PM Hi, Good question, Eugene. There is no indication of octave stringing in any staff notation that I know of, just the fundamental note. I never thought about it, since I played the tablature. I don't think, however, that the practice in and of itself qualifies the transcribers as fundamentalists. I think that Dana hinted at what I always assumed was the reason: the assumption among the Americans and the French appears to have been that a scholarly researcher should be able to play the music on the piano. There were only a few people who had John Ward's demonstrated ability to realize all sorts of tablature directly to the keyboard. The German and English editions seemed to favor guitar transcriptions, if I recall correctly. It was, by the way, a real pain. I spent hours writing pieces out by hand to avoid the page turns in all but the shortest pieces. It could result in the preservation of the Stetson Lute Book (ca. 1985), though! Further there were, or at least it felt like there were, a lot fewer lute enthusiasts back then, and we were less concerned with those kinds of details. Even in the small venues I played, people would still approach you after the concert and ask, what's that instrument you were playing? Perhaps Arthur can clarify this? Best to all, and keep playing Chris. Eugene C. Braig IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/25/2008 5:21 PM Out of curiosity, all ye to read from this edition or Arthur himself, how do the grand staff versions handle octave basses? Thanks, Eugene At 03:29 AM 11/25/2008, David Tayler wrote: I play from the grand staff in Ness's edition, I first mark any differences to the tab, then cut and paste them--fewer page turns. The parts are very nicely realized in the transcription. dt At 06:39 PM 11/24/2008, you wrote: Hi, all, I just checked, and yes, Mr. Ness's old Francesco edition does have grand staff, as do all of the old Corpus des Luthistes Francais volumes from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. (Ballard 12, Bocquet, Morlaye, etc.) Good luck, Guy! Best to all, and keep playing, Chris. Guy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/24/2008 5:10 PM There's a lot of guitar transcriptions out there, if guitar staff is OK. If you need grand staff, a couple that come immediately to mind are the Kanazawa Holborne, and the Ness Francesco volumes (I think Arthur included a grand staff version with that edition, but I don't have a copy myself). -Original Message- From: Herbert Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:01 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Material for sight reading. What is a good way to get a quantity of sight-reading material in the keys of C, F, and G? I need modern staff notation (not tablature), like modern-day piano music. To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Informal performing situations.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/25/2008 7:04 PM On Tue, Nov 25, 2008, Christopher Stetson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm sure there will be better documented replies wassermusik I suspect from my own personal anecdotal evidence, though, that the difficulties of dealing with weather Wind plays havoc with soft winds and literally blows away the notes of a lute. Yet, some instruments are best played outside, like pipes and shalms. We know that some sacred antiphonal vocal music was performed in plazas. What is mind boggling is that buskers play in the various subways of the world. Probably not that different from a wedding reception, and your audience changes every 5-10 minutes, so you don't need a huge playlist. -- Dana Emery To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Material for sight reading.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008, Christopher Stetson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Christopher Stetson 11/25/2008 5:59 PM Hi, Good question, Eugene. There is no indication of octave stringing in any staff notation that I know of, just the fundamental note. I would assume that the exclusion is simply because the use of octave stringing is a technical issue that improves the sound of the string, varys from one instrument to another, and should not be presumed by a modern editor unless it was discussed in the prefatory material to the original edition. Potential splitting of the strings on an octaved course would be a seperate issue, and reentrant stringing (as on a banjo or maybe a cittern) would require some thought. When done as a technical issue (eg, the string would have been an octave lower had that been feasible) then the intended pitch should be indicated, but when (as on a modern banjo) the pitch actually sounded is the pitch musically desired, then that is what should be indicated, and how it is found on the instrument is then a challenge to the player. (Yay for tab!) -- Dana Emery To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Cantio Ruthenica LXII
http://www.torban.org/ruthenicae/images/228.pdf http://www.torban.org/ruthenicae/audio/228.mp3 Amitiés, RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Kartinki s vystavki
[1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-1ck_smC9k fancy arrangemet ! i like the trills. -- References 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-1ck_smC9k To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: You Tube/Vimeo Question
Rob, I tried this with DT's Bach Dm prelude on You Tube. I think it may have helped a bit, but was not entirely successful. After I let it load and play once thru, I played it again, but found more stuttering. Thanks for the thoughts. Steve __ From: Rob MacKillop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:12:03 PM Subject: Re: [LUTE] You Tube/Vimeo Question Try letting the video completely upload before clicking Play... Rob 2008/11/25 Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] All, When I click on the links to You Tube and Vimeo lute videos provided in the posts (and all other posts on those sites, as well), they invariably play, but with some brief sputtering in the audio accompanied by a freeze in the video at odd moments during the performance. What causes that? How can I get rid of it? My computer is an IBM Pentium III laptop running XP. My internet is DSL. Thanks! Steve -- To get on or off this list see list information at [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: antio Ruthenica LXII
A very fascinating melody, Roman. A listened to it time and again. Thank you very much for it Paolo http://www.torban.org/ruthenicae/images/228.pdf http://www.torban.org/ruthenicae/audio/228.mp3 Amitiés, RT To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Le_luth] Cantio Ruthenica LXII
Une melodie merveilleuse, Roman, que j'ai ecoutéz beaucoup fois! Merci Roman Paolo http://www.torban.org/ruthenicae/images/228.pdf http://www.torban.org/ruthenicae/audio/228.mp3 Amitiés, RT Liens Yahoo! Groupes * Pour consulter votre groupe en ligne, accédez à : http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/Le_luth/ * Vos options mail : Mail individuel | Traditionnel * Pour modifier vos options avec le Web, allez sur : http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/Le_luth/join ((Compte Yahoo! requis) * Pour modifier vos options par mail : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Pour vous désincrire de ce groupe, envoyez un mail à : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * L'utilisation de Yahoo! Groupes est soumise à l'acceptation des : http://fr.docs.yahoo.com/info/utos.html To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: You Tube/Vimeo Question
That's a pity, Steve. Does anyone else have this problem? Rob 2008/11/26 Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob, I tried this with DT's Bach Dm prelude on You Tube. I think it may have helped a bit, but was not entirely successful. After I let it load and play once thru, I played it again, but found more stuttering. Thanks for the thoughts. Steve __ From: Rob MacKillop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:12:03 PM Subject: Re: [LUTE] You Tube/Vimeo Question Try letting the video completely upload before clicking Play... Rob 2008/11/25 Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] All, When I click on the links to You Tube and Vimeo lute videos provided in the posts (and all other posts on those sites, as well), they invariably play, but with some brief sputtering in the audio accompanied by a freeze in the video at odd moments during the performance. What causes that? How can I get rid of it? My computer is an IBM Pentium III laptop running XP. My internet is DSL. Thanks! Steve -- To get on or off this list see list information at [2][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. [8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. mailto:Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 5. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html 7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html