Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-17 Thread Jon Murphy
Ed,

Looks as if he was sending in rich text rather than plain text. An
option on most software. An option to be avoided on lists as not all have
the software set up to read it.

Best, Jon


- Original Message - 
From: Ed Durbrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: (serious/popular)


 It is certainly not by chance,
 tha=  t  Bakfarks  first book ends with the intabulation of
Verdelot's
 Ultimi  mei  sospi=  ri  while  the  Cracow  lute book with
Josquin'
 Faulte  d'argent.  It  has been pr= obably immediately understood
by
 his contemporaries as a kind of joke.

 Kind of goes over my head. What was the joke?
 -- 
 Ed Durbrow
 Saitama, Japan
 http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/








Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-17 Thread P-Kiraly
Dear Ed,

Bakfark finished his Lyon lute book with the piece my last sighs 
(Ultimi  mei  sospiri), and the Cracow lute book ends with a 
reference to the lack of money (Faulte  d'argent).

Best regards, Peter
-
Peter Király
Glockenstr. 34
D-67655 Kaiserslautern
T/Fax. (00)49 631 69866
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-16 Thread Ed Durbrow
It is certainly not by chance,
tha=  t  Bakfarks  first book ends with the intabulation of Verdelot's
Ultimi  mei  sospi=  ri  while  the  Cracow  lute book with Josquin'
Faulte  d'argent.  It  has been pr= obably immediately understood by
his contemporaries as a kind of joke.

Kind of goes over my head. What was the joke?
-- 
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/




Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-15 Thread P-Kiraly

   Dear friends,

   James A Stimson wrote:

   [DEL:Just  because  Francesco  didn't include an= y dances in his
   publications :DEL]

   [DEL:  doesn't mean he never played them. :DEL]

   Of  course  not. They had to play much dance music. And beside so= los
   much  ensemblemusic,  too.  Also,  they played to diners and the like,
   where probab= ly not the lute music was the loudest...

   Thus  this  is how they worked in real life, but their editions, = the
   tablatures of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark show what they considered
   themselves,  highb=  row  musicians,  composers of serious music. They
   choose  carefully  what  to prese= nt in their editions: fantasias and
   intabulations,  and  no  dance  music  and  the li= ke. Also, as Denys
   Stephens rightly put, they were choosing even their intabulations= not
   without considering what the text says. It is certainly not by chance,
   tha=  t  Bakfarks  first book ends with the intabulation of Verdelot's
   Ultimi  mei  sospi=  ri  while  the  Cracow  lute book with Josquin'
   Faulte  d'argent.  It  has been pr= obably immediately understood by
   his contemporaries as a kind of joke.

   Best wishes, Peter-

   Peter Kir=E1ly

   Glockenstr. 34

   D-67655 Kaiserslautern

   T/Fax. (00)49 631 69866

   E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-14 Thread Denys Stephens
Dear Peter,
You wrote:

If  we  have  a  look  on  16th century lute tablatures, it is also
obvious,  that  some musicians published only 'serious/highbrow' music.
Look  at  for example the editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark:
Only  'serious/highbrow' music   like fantasies and intabulations. Not
a  single  'popular'  piece like songs, or dance music and the like.
Thus  without  saying  it, they made very much a distinction between
serious and popular.

I can see where you are coming from on this, and that you can make
a good case for your view. I like to think, though, that Francesco was not
completely humourless. He does give us quite a number of intabulations
of pieces by Claudin de Sermisy whose chansons, when you get to know
them, have quite a bit of humour and sexual innuendo. Judging by the
quantity of surviving settings Claudin's music was certainly very popular.
Francesco gives us settings, among others,  of Vignon vignetta,  a
drinking
song in praise of the vine and Martin menuyt. The latter, for those not
familiar with it, is about Martin and his girlfriend Alix who decide to make
love whilst taking their pig to market. To avoid losing the pig they tie it
to Alix' ankle - unfortunately the pig gets frightened and runs away, taking
Alix with it! The piece is suitably frenetic if played at the right speed
and would
be quite a tour de force on the lute. Music like this surely must have
raised a
few smiles in Francesco's audience, even when played on the lute?

Best wishes,

Denys








Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-14 Thread Roman Turovsky
Both TLdeVictoria and delEncina were clergymen, but the difference in
mindset is rather noticeable
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://turovsky.org
http://polyhymnion.org

 Dear Jurek and All:
 Just because Francesco didn't include any dances in his publications
 doesn't mean he never played them. A musician of his caliber may not have
 needed an intabulation to play a dance.
 Yours,
 Jim
 Dear Jurek (Jerzy),
 ... There were real stars among both groups, whose names became known
 to the history, and thousands of others forgotten.'
 Look  at  for example the editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark:
 Only  'serious/highbrow' music like fantasies and intabulations. Not a
 single  'popular'  piece like songs, or dance music and the like.
 Thus  without  saying  it, they made very much a distinction between
 serious and popular.
 Best regards, Peter
 So, in a way, they were both ''serious and popular''. But I, since
 long, cannot accept somehow they were really that serious and profund,
 without creating/playing a single dance movement. Simply, I do not
 trust, life is not that sad all the time...
 
 Jurek (for Jerzy), which I really prefare - thaks Peter!
 
 
 
 
 
 




Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-13 Thread P-Kiraly

   Dear Jurek (Jerzy),

   you  are  absolutely  right  saying  'there  were always some kind of=
   distinctions in style and organisation There were real stars among
   both groups, whose names became known to the history, and thousands of
   others forgotten.'

   If  I my memory does not fails, Weiss received the highest salar= y at
   the  Dresden  court.  It was definitely the case with Bakfark while he
   served Emperor Max= imilan. He was the best paid court musician of the
   Emperor.

   There  is also much historical data, which prove, the best music= ians
   wanted  sometimes  enormous  high  payments.  During the mid 1570s the
   Bavarian Duke tried to get Lorenzino into his services. But Lorenzino,
   a  young  musician  =  at that time, wanted such a high salary, which,
   according  to  the  Duke,  never have = been paid in his land any good
   musician,  even not the best. And this is written= by a monarch, whose
   Kapellmester  happened  to  be  Orlando di Lasso, not a cheap o= ne at
   all.

   If  we  have  a  look  on  16th century lute tablatures, it is also o=
   bvious,  that  some musicians published only 'serious/highbrow' music.
   Look  at  for example the= editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark:
   Only  'serious/highbrow' music = like fantasies and intabulations. Not
   a  single  'popular'  piece like songs, or d= ance music and the like.
   Thus  without  saying  it, they made very much a distinction be= tween
   serious and popular.

   Best regards, Peter

   -

   Peter Király

   Glockenstr. 34

   D-67655 Kaiserslautern

   T/Fax. (00)49 631 69866

   E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-13 Thread Thomas Schall
Hi,

hasn't some intavolations of Francesco being found? 
I think I bought a book containg song settings attributed to Francesco
(although owning my copy for a while I haven't looked at it carefully) -
Arthur will know ...

Several of Francescos recercare and fantasia definitly are based on
vocal models ...

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Fre, 2003-12-12 um 12.31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Dear Jurek (Jerzy),
 
you  are  absolutely  right  saying  'there  were always some kind of=
distinctions in style and organisation There were real stars among
both groups, whose names became known to the history, and thousands of
others forgotten.'
 
If  I my memory does not fails, Weiss received the highest salar= y at
the  Dresden  court.  It was definitely the case with Bakfark while he
served Emperor Max= imilan. He was the best paid court musician of the
Emperor.
 
There  is also much historical data, which prove, the best music= ians
wanted  sometimes  enormous  high  payments.  During the mid 1570s the
Bavarian Duke tried to get Lorenzino into his services. But Lorenzino,
a  young  musician  =  at that time, wanted such a high salary, which,
according  to  the  Duke,  never have = been paid in his land any good
musician,  even not the best. And this is written= by a monarch, whose
Kapellmester  happened  to  be  Orlando di Lasso, not a cheap o= ne at
all.
 
If  we  have  a  look  on  16th century lute tablatures, it is also o=
bvious,  that  some musicians published only 'serious/highbrow' music.
Look  at  for example the= editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark:
Only  'serious/highbrow' music = like fantasies and intabulations. Not
a  single  'popular'  piece like songs, or d= ance music and the like.
Thus  without  saying  it, they made very much a distinction be= tween
serious and popular.
 
Best regards, Peter
 
-
 
Peter Király
 
Glockenstr. 34
 
D-67655 Kaiserslautern
 
T/Fax. (00)49 631 69866
 
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3   
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

--


Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-13 Thread Jerzy ZAK
Thanks for joinin, Peter,


On Friday, Dec 12, 2003, at 12:31 Europe/Warsaw, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Dear Jurek (Jerzy),
 ... There were real stars among both groups, whose names became known 
 to the history, and thousands of others forgotten.'
..
 Look  at  for example the editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark: 
 Only  'serious/highbrow' music like fantasies and intabulations. Not a 
  single  'popular'  piece like songs, or dance music and the like. 
 Thus  without  saying  it, they made very much a distinction between 
 serious and popular.
 Best regards, Peter

So, in a way, they were both ''serious and popular''. But I, since 
long, cannot accept somehow they were really that serious and profund, 
without creating/playing a single dance movement. Simply, I do not 
trust, life is not that sad all the time...

Jurek (for Jerzy), which I really prefare - thaks Peter!




Re: (serious/popular)

2003-12-13 Thread James A Stimson




Dear Jurek and All:
 Just because Francesco didn't include any dances in his publications
doesn't mean he never played them. A musician of his caliber may not have
needed an intabulation to play a dance.
Yours,
Jim



   

  Jerzy ZAK

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wp.pl   cc: 

   Subject:  Re: (serious/popular) 

  12/13/2003 06:16 

  PM   

   

   





Thanks for joinin, Peter,


On Friday, Dec 12, 2003, at 12:31 Europe/Warsaw, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Dear Jurek (Jerzy),
 ... There were real stars among both groups, whose names became known
 to the history, and thousands of others forgotten.'
.
 Look  at  for example the editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark:
 Only  'serious/highbrow' music like fantasies and intabulations. Not a
  single  'popular'  piece like songs, or dance music and the like.
 Thus  without  saying  it, they made very much a distinction between
 serious and popular.
 Best regards, Peter

So, in a way, they were both ''serious and popular''. But I, since
long, cannot accept somehow they were really that serious and profund,
without creating/playing a single dance movement. Simply, I do not
trust, life is not that sad all the time...

Jurek (for Jerzy), which I really prefare - thaks Peter!