Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Liviu Andronic]

Hello Rob

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
 PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also be
 happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the betas
 yet?).  To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I would need to
 patch the packaging files and inertia prevents me from doing so unless there
 is interest.

I'm currently in the process of switching to Xubuntu---I'm probably in
for some stability, coming from the rolling Debian testing and
previously Gentoo---and personally I'd love to have LyX 1.6.x and the
2.0 alphas running independently on my netbook.

Thanks for working on the Ubuntu packaging. Regards
Liviu


-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Liviu Andronic]

Hello Rob

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rob Oakes  wrote:
> PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also be
> happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the betas
> yet?).  To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I would need to
> patch the packaging files and inertia prevents me from doing so unless there
> is interest.
>
I'm currently in the process of switching to Xubuntu---I'm probably in
for some stability, coming from the rolling Debian testing and
previously Gentoo---and personally I'd love to have LyX 1.6.x and the
2.0 alphas running independently on my netbook.

Thanks for working on the Ubuntu packaging. Regards
Liviu


-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Manveru]

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org:
 Rob Oakes wrote:
  Dear LyX Users and Developers,

 firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
 is the combination of lyx 1.6.5  qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
 policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7
 automatically updated through the online updates - i guess that regular
 crashes really debase the reputation of the package in the users eyes.

As far as I know they were allow to patch the bug only. They do not
want to change functionality and change any library dependencies. But
I think this is only available for packages actively maintained on
Launchpad for Ubuntu maintenance. I wonder if it is possible to patch
the version and release bugfix version.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
     gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Richard Kleeman]

Just updated as well with Lucid. Works well. Thanks for the ppa.

On 08/17/2010 11:45 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:

Dear LyX Users and Developers,

I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu
packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX).

I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our
request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick
Meerkat, 10.10). Packages have been compiled and are available from
Launchpad as of this moment (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx).

For users of Lucid Lynx (10.04) who would like to upgrade, I have
created a PPA that you can use
(https://launchpad.net/~lyx-outline-devel/+archive/lyx-stable). To
update, use the following commands from the terminal:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:lyx-outline-devel/lyx-stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade

This will add the repository to your list of software sources and then
update any software you have installed. If you have any problems, please
let me know.

Cheers,

Rob

PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also
be happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the
betas yet?). To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I would
need to patch the packaging files and inertia prevents me from doing so
unless there is interest.

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Manveru]

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda :
> Rob Oakes wrote:
>>  Dear LyX Users and Developers,
>
> firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
> is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
> policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7
> automatically updated through the online updates - i guess that regular
> crashes really debase the reputation of the package in the users eyes.

As far as I know they were allow to patch the bug only. They do not
want to change functionality and change any library dependencies. But
I think this is only available for packages actively maintained on
Launchpad for Ubuntu maintenance. I wonder if it is possible to patch
the version and release bugfix version.

-- 
Manveru
jabber: manv...@manveru.pl
     gg: 1624001
   http://www.manveru.pl

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Richard Kleeman]

Just updated as well with Lucid. Works well. Thanks for the ppa.

On 08/17/2010 11:45 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:

Dear LyX Users and Developers,

I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu
packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX).

I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers, and they have granted our
request to include 1.6.7 in the next version of Ubuntu (Maverick
Meerkat, 10.10). Packages have been compiled and are available from
Launchpad as of this moment (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx).

For users of Lucid Lynx (10.04) who would like to upgrade, I have
created a PPA that you can use
(https://launchpad.net/~lyx-outline-devel/+archive/lyx-stable). To
update, use the following commands from the terminal:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:lyx-outline-devel/lyx-stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade

This will add the repository to your list of software sources and then
update any software you have installed. If you have any problems, please
let me know.

Cheers,

Rob

PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also
be happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the
betas yet?). To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I would
need to patch the packaging files and inertia prevents me from doing so
unless there is interest.

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Pavel Sanda]

Rob Oakes wrote:
  Dear LyX Users and Developers,

firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
is the combination of lyx 1.6.5  qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 
automatically updated through the online updates - i guess that regular
crashes really debase the reputation of the package in the users eyes.

pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Rob Oakes]

I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of 
Ubuntu.  Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(  But 
it never hurts to ask.

Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the 
instructions in the original email.  Once a user adds it to their software 
sources, the updates will be automatic and will come through the regular system 
updates.  We can also use the same process to push other source releases to 
Ubuntu users outside of the traditional sixth month Ubuntu update cycle.


On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:

 Rob Oakes wrote:
 Dear LyX Users and Developers,
 
 firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
 is the combination of lyx 1.6.5  qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
 policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 
 automatically updated through the online updates - i guess that regular
 crashes really debase the reputation of the package in the users eyes.
 
 pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Pavel Sanda]

Rob Oakes wrote:
 I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of 
 Ubuntu.  Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(  
 But it never hurts to ask.

you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very 
unstable package given the qt 4.6 conditions.

 Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the 
 instructions in the original email.  Once a user adds it to their software 
 sources, the updates will be automatic and will come through the regular 
 system updates.  We can also use the same process to push other source 
 releases to Ubuntu users outside of the traditional sixth month Ubuntu update 
 cycle.

most buntu users have no idea about our side channels, so the default update 
service is imho important one.
pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Rob Oakes]

I'll see what I can do.  Those are both strong points.  Fortunately, the next 
version of Ubuntu (due in October) will ship with the latest version of LyX.  
I've also created the packages on Launchpad, so I think it's just a matter of 
getting them incorporated.

On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:

 Rob Oakes wrote:
 I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of 
 Ubuntu.  Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(  
 But it never hurts to ask.
 
 you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very 
 unstable package given the qt 4.6 conditions.
 
 Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the 
 instructions in the original email.  Once a user adds it to their software 
 sources, the updates will be automatic and will come through the regular 
 system updates.  We can also use the same process to push other source 
 releases to Ubuntu users outside of the traditional sixth month Ubuntu 
 update cycle.
 
 most buntu users have no idea about our side channels, so the default update 
 service is imho important one.
 pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Paul Rubin]

Just installed 1.6.7 on my laptop (Mint Isadora/Ubuntu Lucid).  Many thanks!

/Paul

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Pavel Sanda]

Rob Oakes wrote:
>  Dear LyX Users and Developers,

firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 
automatically updated through the online updates - i guess that regular
crashes really debase the reputation of the package in the users eyes.

pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Rob Oakes]

I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of 
Ubuntu.  Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(  But 
it never hurts to ask.

Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the 
instructions in the original email.  Once a user adds it to their software 
sources, the updates will be automatic and will come through the regular system 
updates.  We can also use the same process to push other source releases to 
Ubuntu users outside of the traditional sixth month Ubuntu update cycle.


On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:

> Rob Oakes wrote:
>> Dear LyX Users and Developers,
> 
> firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report
> is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's
> policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 
> automatically updated through the online updates - i guess that regular
> crashes really debase the reputation of the package in the users eyes.
> 
> pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Pavel Sanda]

Rob Oakes wrote:
> I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of 
> Ubuntu.  Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(  
> But it never hurts to ask.

you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very 
unstable package given the qt 4.6 conditions.

> Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the 
> instructions in the original email.  Once a user adds it to their software 
> sources, the updates will be automatic and will come through the regular 
> system updates.  We can also use the same process to push other source 
> releases to Ubuntu users outside of the traditional sixth month Ubuntu update 
> cycle.

most buntu users have no idea about our side channels, so the default update 
service is imho important one.
pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Rob Oakes]

I'll see what I can do.  Those are both strong points.  Fortunately, the next 
version of Ubuntu (due in October) will ship with the latest version of LyX.  
I've also created the packages on Launchpad, so I think it's just a matter of 
getting them incorporated.

On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:

> Rob Oakes wrote:
>> I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of 
>> Ubuntu.  Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :(  
>> But it never hurts to ask.
> 
> you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very 
> unstable package given the qt 4.6 conditions.
> 
>> Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the 
>> instructions in the original email.  Once a user adds it to their software 
>> sources, the updates will be automatic and will come through the regular 
>> system updates.  We can also use the same process to push other source 
>> releases to Ubuntu users outside of the traditional sixth month Ubuntu 
>> update cycle.
> 
> most buntu users have no idea about our side channels, so the default update 
> service is imho important one.
> pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

[Paul Rubin]

Just installed 1.6.7 on my laptop (Mint Isadora/Ubuntu Lucid).  Many thanks!

/Paul

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Abdelrazak Younes]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote:

 Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.org writes:
  It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
  like every time I do a make install, I lose some session information
  like toolbar position (on a mac).
 
  How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
  is different from .lyx? Two different direcotries is annoying.

 I looked at the file and it kind of gives the answer. It is full of
 binary blobs:


 0\progress\geomet...@bytearray(\x1\xd9\xd0\xcb\0\x1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0)

 I guess these get invalidated every time the phase of the moon changes.



More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then the Qt
session information is reset. So if make install copy this file thus
losing date information, instead of merely updating it if needed, you
session will be reset.

I know this is not ideal and the plan was to get rid someday of the toolbars
position config file someday.

Abdel.




 JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 9 août 10 à 00:16, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then  
the Qt session information is reset. So if make install copy this  
file thus losing date information, instead of merely updating it if  
needed, you session will be reset.


I know this is not ideal and the plan was to get rid someday of the  
toolbars position config file someday.


Thanks for the information.

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Abdelrazak Younes]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:

> Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES  writes:
> > It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
> > like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information
> > like toolbar position (on a mac).
> >
> > How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
> > is different from .lyx? Two different direcotries is annoying.
>
> I looked at the file and it kind of gives the answer. It is full of
> binary blobs:
>
>
> 0\progress\geomet...@bytearray(\x1\xd9\xd0\xcb\0\x1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0)
>
> I guess these get invalidated every time the phase of the moon changes.
>


More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then the Qt
session information is reset. So if "make install" copy this file thus
losing date information, instead of merely updating it if needed, you
session will be reset.

I know this is not ideal and the plan was to get rid someday of the toolbars
position config file someday.

Abdel.



>
> JMarc
>

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

Le 9 août 10 à 00:16, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then  
the Qt session information is reset. So if "make install" copy this  
file thus losing date information, instead of merely updating it if  
needed, you session will be reset.


I know this is not ideal and the plan was to get rid someday of the  
toolbars position config file someday.


Thanks for the information.

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Sven Hoexter]

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:

Hi,

 Any idea what might have happened?

I guess I should've forwarded
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332
but I never found a way to reproduce it. :(

And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the issue.

Cheers,
Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES]

Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no writes:
 Removing .lyx/ did not help. So I used strace to find the difference
 between the two users.

 I found there is also a per-user .config/LyX/ directory. I removed this,
 and now LyX worked fine!

It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
like every time I do a make install, I lose some session information
like toolbar position (on a mac).

How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
is different from .lyx? Two different direcotries is annoying.

JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES]

Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.org writes:
 It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
 like every time I do a make install, I lose some session information
 like toolbar position (on a mac).

 How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
 is different from .lyx? Two different direcotries is annoying.

I looked at the file and it kind of gives the answer. It is full of
binary blobs:

0\progress\geomet...@bytearray(\x1\xd9\xd0\xcb\0\x1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0)

I guess these get invalidated every time the phase of the moon changes.

JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Sven Hoexter]

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:

Hi,

> Any idea what might have happened?

I guess I should've forwarded
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332
but I never found a way to reproduce it. :(

And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the issue.

Cheers,
Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES]

Helge Hafting  writes:
> Removing .lyx/ did not help. So I used "strace" to find the difference
> between the two users.
>
> I found there is also a per-user .config/LyX/ directory. I removed this,
> and now LyX worked fine!

It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information
like toolbar position (on a mac).

How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
is different from .lyx? Two different direcotries is annoying.

JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

[Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES]

Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES  writes:
> It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks
> like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information
> like toolbar position (on a mac).
>
> How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that
> is different from .lyx? Two different direcotries is annoying.

I looked at the file and it kind of gives the answer. It is full of
binary blobs:

0\progress\geomet...@bytearray(\x1\xd9\xd0\xcb\0\x1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x1?\0\0\0\x1d\0\0\0\0\0\0)

I guess these get invalidated every time the phase of the moon changes.

JMarc

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kümmel]

Joost Verburg wrote:
 On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
 Very nice!

 Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still
 stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it.
 
 Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE.

Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all
deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more?

I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects
which I really do not need when I deep in the C++ code.

Peter


 
   I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010

 Do they also work when using MSVC 2008?
 
 They should work, but you'll have to include the MSVC 2010 runtime. 
 Unlike MSVC 2008 no manifest is required for that. Just put the DLL in 
 the directory.
 
 The Ghostscript package is incomplete since the lib folder of the
 Ghostscript installation is missing. Without these files we cannot
 provide a full featured Ghostscript.
 
 All that is packaged inside Ghostscript! This improves performance and 
 makes it easier to maintain.
 
 Joost
 

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Stephan Witt]

Am 12.07.2010 um 13:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:

 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
 Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
 
 
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
 
 The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
 tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.
 
 OK, thanks. Next try:
 
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

In case it is of interest...

These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too.
Built successfully with autotools.

Stephan

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Stephan Witt wrote:
 In case it is of interest...
 
 These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too.
 Built successfully with autotools.

Thanks.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/13/2010 4:22 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote:

Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all
deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more?

I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects
which I really do not need when I deep in the C++ code.


Yea I think that makes sense.

Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kümmel]

Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Very nice!
>>
>> Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still
>> stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it.
> 
> Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE.

Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all
deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more?

I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects
which I really do not need when I deep in the C++ code.

Peter


> 
>>  > I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010
>>
>> Do they also work when using MSVC 2008?
> 
> They should work, but you'll have to include the MSVC 2010 runtime. 
> Unlike MSVC 2008 no manifest is required for that. Just put the DLL in 
> the directory.
> 
>> The Ghostscript package is incomplete since the "lib" folder of the
>> Ghostscript installation is missing. Without these files we cannot
>> provide a full featured Ghostscript.
> 
> All that is packaged inside Ghostscript! This improves performance and 
> makes it easier to maintain.
> 
> Joost
> 

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Stephan Witt]

Am 12.07.2010 um 13:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:

> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>> Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
>>> 
>>> 
>>>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
>>>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
>> 
>> The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
>> tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.
> 
> OK, thanks. Next try:
> 
>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

In case it is of interest...

These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too.
Built successfully with autotools.

Stephan

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Stephan Witt wrote:
> In case it is of interest...
> 
> These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too.
> Built successfully with autotools.

Thanks.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/13/2010 4:22 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote:

Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all
deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more?

I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects
which I really do not need when I deep in the C++ code.


Yea I think that makes sense.

Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Peter Kuemmel wrote:
 It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:
 
 http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1
 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition
 
 We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
 so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.

OK, thanks.

Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at

ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Enrico Forestieri]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:46:04AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
  It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:
  
  http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1
  0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition
  
  We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
  so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.
 
 OK, thanks.
 
 Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
 
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?

The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.

-- 
Enrico

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Enrico Forestieri wrote:
  Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
 
  
  ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
  ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
 
 The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
 tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.

OK, thanks. Next try:

ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Pavel Sanda]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
   Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
  
   
   ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
   ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
  
  The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
  tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.
 
 OK, thanks. Next try:
 
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

builds fine on gentoo.
pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kümmel]

 Verburg wrote:
 On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
 Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.
 
 I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010:
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/
 This includes gettext 0.18 and iconv 1.13.1.
 Perhaps you could use these as well when you upgrade to 2010?
 
 With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just 
 clicking lyx.exe, without the need for a launcher or any registry keys 
 or environment variables. So creating a new installer for 2.0 should be 
 much more simple! We should talk about this sometime.
 

Very good!

What was the plan for 2.0?

Peter

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Uwe Stöhr]

 With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just 
clicking lyx.exe,
 without the need for a launcher or any registry keys or environment variables.

Very nice!

Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation 
option and don't know where to specify it.


 I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010

Do they also work when using MSVC 2008?

The Ghostscript package is incomplete since the lib folder of the Ghostscript installation is 
missing. Without these files we cannot provide a full featured Ghostscript.


thanks and regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Very nice!

Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still
stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it.


Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE.


  I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010

Do they also work when using MSVC 2008?


They should work, but you'll have to include the MSVC 2010 runtime. 
Unlike MSVC 2008 no manifest is required for that. Just put the DLL in 
the directory.



The Ghostscript package is incomplete since the lib folder of the
Ghostscript installation is missing. Without these files we cannot
provide a full featured Ghostscript.


All that is packaged inside Ghostscript! This improves performance and 
makes it easier to maintain.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:
> 
> http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1
> 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition
> 
> We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
> so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.

OK, thanks.

Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at

ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Enrico Forestieri]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:46:04AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

> Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:
> > 
> > http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1
> > 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition
> > 
> > We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
> > so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
> 
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?

The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.

-- 
Enrico

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
> >
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
> 
> The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
> tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.

OK, thanks. Next try:

ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Pavel Sanda]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at
> > >
> > > 
> > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ?
> > 
> > The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the
> > tarball. It was not added to src/support/Makefile.am at r34858.
> 
> OK, thanks. Next try:
> 
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

builds fine on gentoo.
pavel

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kümmel]

 Verburg wrote:
> On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.
> 
> I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010:
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/
> This includes gettext 0.18 and iconv 1.13.1.
> Perhaps you could use these as well when you upgrade to 2010?
> 
> With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just 
> clicking lyx.exe, without the need for a launcher or any registry keys 
> or environment variables. So creating a new installer for 2.0 should be 
> much more simple! We should talk about this sometime.
> 

Very good!

What was the plan for 2.0?

Peter

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Uwe Stöhr]

> With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just 
clicking lyx.exe,
> without the need for a launcher or any registry keys or environment variables.

Very nice!

Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation 
option and don't know where to specify it.


> I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010

Do they also work when using MSVC 2008?

The Ghostscript package is incomplete since the "lib" folder of the Ghostscript installation is 
missing. Without these files we cannot provide a full featured Ghostscript.


thanks and regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Very nice!

Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still
stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it.


Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE.


 > I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010

Do they also work when using MSVC 2008?


They should work, but you'll have to include the MSVC 2010 runtime. 
Unlike MSVC 2008 no manifest is required for that. Just put the DLL in 
the directory.



The Ghostscript package is incomplete since the "lib" folder of the
Ghostscript installation is missing. Without these files we cannot
provide a full featured Ghostscript.


All that is packaged inside Ghostscript! This improves performance and 
makes it easier to maintain.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jean-Pierre Chrétien]

Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes:

 
 I've uploaded the tarballs to
 
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
 
 Please check and report back.

Compiles and installs fine on Debian Lenny.

Remaining warnings:
insets/InsetCitation.cpp: In function ‘lyx::docstring
lyx::unnamed::complexLabel(const lyx::Buffer, const std::string, const
lyx::docstring, const lyx::docstring, const lyx::docstring, 
lyx::CiteEngine)’:
insets/InsetCitation.cpp:202: warning: deprecated conversion from string
constant to ‘char*’
insets/InsetCitation.cpp:206: warning: deprecated conversion from string
constant to ‘char*’

-- 
Jean-Pierre

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

BH wrote:
 Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here:
 
 http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg

Thanks, I downloaded it.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Joost Verburg wrote:
 On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
  Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
  There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts
  with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
  not test it. Does it work?
 
 The tr1 errors are fixed now when using CMake.

Does now mean after Peter's recent commits?

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Uwe Stöhr]

 We can go on ...

I've uploaded my installer:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=17719

Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org?

thanks and regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Uwe Stöhr wrote:
 I've uploaded my installer:
 https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id
 =17719

Thanks, I grabbed them.

 Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org?

I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out 
(waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release 
1.6.7 after these problems are solved.

I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours, 
Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 5:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Does now mean after Peter's recent commits?


Yes.

Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Joost Verburg wrote:
  Does now mean after Peter's recent commits?
 
 Yes.

So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball?

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 10:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out
(waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release
1.6.7 after these problems are solved.


The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 
2010 doesn't work.


All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 
2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball after the last 
issue is sorted out (the compile error I reported yesterday). Peter has 
solved the TR1 problem already.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball?


No, there's still another compile error. See my previous message.

Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Joost Verburg wrote:
 The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 
 2010 doesn't work.

I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then.

 All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 
 2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball after the last 
 issue is sorted out (the compile error I reported yesterday). Peter has 
 solved the TR1 problem already.

OK. So we'll delay 1.6.7 until then.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kuemmel]

 Original-Nachricht 
 Datum: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:40:04 +0200
 Von: Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org
 An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
 CC: Joost Verburg jo...@lyx.org
 Betreff: Re: LyX 1.6.7

 Joost Verburg wrote:
  The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 
  2010 doesn't work.
 
 I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then.
 
  All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 
  2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball after the last 
  issue is sorted out (the compile error I reported yesterday). Peter has 
  solved the TR1 problem already.
 
 OK. So we'll delay 1.6.7 until then.
 

It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:


http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc10-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition

We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.

Peter



-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Uwe Stöhr]

Am 11.07.2010 16:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:


I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours,
Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt.


Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.


I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010:
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/
This includes gettext 0.18 and iconv 1.13.1.
Perhaps you could use these as well when you upgrade to 2010?

With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just 
clicking lyx.exe, without the need for a launcher or any registry keys 
or environment variables. So creating a new installer for 2.0 should be 
much more simple! We should talk about this sometime.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jean-Pierre Chrétien]

Jürgen Spitzmüller  lyx.org> writes:

> 
> I've uploaded the tarballs to
> 
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
> 
> Please check and report back.

Compiles and installs fine on Debian Lenny.

Remaining warnings:
insets/InsetCitation.cpp: In function ‘lyx::docstring
lyxcomplexLabel(const lyx::Buffer&, const std::string&, const
lyx::docstring&, const lyx::docstring&, const lyx::docstring&, 
lyx::CiteEngine)’:
insets/InsetCitation.cpp:202: warning: deprecated conversion from string
constant to ‘char*’
insets/InsetCitation.cpp:206: warning: deprecated conversion from string
constant to ‘char*’

-- 
Jean-Pierre

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

BH wrote:
> Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here:
> 
> http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg

Thanks, I downloaded it.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
> > There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts
> > with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
> > not test it. Does it work?
> 
> The tr1 errors are fixed now when using CMake.

Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits?

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Uwe Stöhr]

> We can go on ...

I've uploaded my installer:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=17719

Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org?

thanks and regards
Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I've uploaded my installer:
> https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id
> =17719

Thanks, I grabbed them.

> Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org?

I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out 
(waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release 
1.6.7 after these problems are solved.

I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours, 
Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 5:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits?


Yes.

Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits?
> 
> Yes.

So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball?

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 10:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out
(waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release
1.6.7 after these problems are solved.


The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 
2010 doesn't work.


All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 
2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball after the last 
issue is sorted out (the compile error I reported yesterday). Peter has 
solved the TR1 problem already.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball?


No, there's still another compile error. See my previous message.

Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Joost Verburg wrote:
> The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 
> 2010 doesn't work.

I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then.

> All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 
> 2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball after the last 
> issue is sorted out (the compile error I reported yesterday). Peter has 
> solved the TR1 problem already.

OK. So we'll delay 1.6.7 until then.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kuemmel]

 Original-Nachricht 
> Datum: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:40:04 +0200
> Von: "Jürgen Spitzmüller" <sp...@lyx.org>
> An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> CC: Joost Verburg <jo...@lyx.org>
> Betreff: Re: LyX 1.6.7

> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 
> > 2010 doesn't work.
> 
> I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then.
> 
> > All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 
> > 2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball after the last 
> > issue is sorted out (the compile error I reported yesterday). Peter has 
> > solved the TR1 problem already.
> 
> OK. So we'll delay 1.6.7 until then.
> 

It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:


http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc10-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition

We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch,
so now I have no problems with msvc10 any more.

Peter



-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Uwe Stöhr]

Am 11.07.2010 16:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:


I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours,
Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt.


Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:

Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems.


I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010:
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/
This includes gettext 0.18 and iconv 1.13.1.
Perhaps you could use these as well when you upgrade to 2010?

With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just 
clicking lyx.exe, without the need for a launcher or any registry keys 
or environment variables. So creating a new installer for 2.0 should be 
much more simple! We should talk about this sometime.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
 I've uploaded the tarballs to
 
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
 
 Please check and report back.
 
 I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.

I've deleted them again due to the po file problem. I'll keep you informed.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
  I've uploaded the tarballs to
 
  
  ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
  ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
  
 
  Please check and report back.
 
  
 
  I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
 
 I've deleted them again due to the po file problem. I'll keep you informed.

We can go on ...

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Sven Hoexter]

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

 We can go on ...

Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this
time ...) so far.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[BH]

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
  I've uploaded the tarballs to
 
 
          ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
          ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
 
 
  Please check and report back.
 
 
 
  I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.

 I've deleted them again due to the po file problem. I'll keep you informed.

 We can go on ...

Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here:

http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg

BH

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

I've uploaded the tarballs to

 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

Please check and report back.

I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.


I'm getting compile error C2668: 'lyx::copy_if' : ambiguous call to 
overloaded function. I guess this is because my compiler also has 
std::copy_if. With trunk I have no such issues.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kuemmel]

 Original-Nachricht 
 On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
  I've uploaded the tarballs to
 
   ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
   ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
 
  Please check and report back.
 
  I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
 
 I'm getting compile error C2668: 'lyx::copy_if' : ambiguous call to 
 overloaded function. I guess this is because my compiler also has 
 std::copy_if. With trunk I have no such issues.

This is a show-stopper.

Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with 
boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
not test it. Does it work?

Peter

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:

Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with 
boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
not test it. Does it work?


The tr1 errors are fixed now when using CMake. Thanks.
I'm still getting compile errors though, all similar to:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(133): warning C4273: 'id' : inconsistent dll linkage
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(65) : see previous definition of 'public: static 
std::locale::id std::numpunctunsigned long::id'
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(65) : while compiling class template static data 
member 'std::locale::id std::numpunct_Elem::id'

()
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(133): error C2491: 'std::numpunct_Elem::id' : 
definition of dllimport static data member not allowed


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I've uploaded the tarballs to
> 
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
> 
> Please check and report back.
> 
> I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.

I've deleted them again due to the po file problem. I'll keep you informed.

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I've uploaded the tarballs to
> >
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
> > 
> >
> > Please check and report back.
> >
> > 
> >
> > I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
> 
> I've deleted them again due to the po file problem. I'll keep you informed.

We can go on ...

Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Sven Hoexter]

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

> We can go on ...

Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this
time ...) so far.

Sven
-- 
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
   [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[BH]

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller  wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> > I've uploaded the tarballs to
>> >
>> >
>> >         ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
>> >         ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
>> >
>> >
>> > Please check and report back.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
>>
>> I've deleted them again due to the po file problem. I'll keep you informed.
>
> We can go on ...

Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here:

http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg

BH

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

I've uploaded the tarballs to

 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
 ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

Please check and report back.

I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.


I'm getting compile error C2668: 'lyx::copy_if' : ambiguous call to 
overloaded function. I guess this is because my compiler also has 
std::copy_if. With trunk I have no such issues.


Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Peter Kuemmel]

 Original-Nachricht 
> On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I've uploaded the tarballs to
> >
> >  ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz
> >  ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2
> >
> > Please check and report back.
> >
> > I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday.
> 
> I'm getting compile error C2668: 'lyx::copy_if' : ambiguous call to 
> overloaded function. I guess this is because my compiler also has 
> std::copy_if. With trunk I have no such issues.

This is a show-stopper.

Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with 
boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
not test it. Does it work?

Peter

-- 
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Re: LyX 1.6.7

[Joost Verburg]

On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:

Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default.
There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with 
boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could
not test it. Does it work?


The tr1 errors are fixed now when using CMake. Thanks.
I'm still getting compile errors though, all similar to:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(133): warning C4273: 'id' : inconsistent dll linkage
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(65) : see previous definition of 'public: static 
std::locale::id std::numpunct::id'
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(65) : while compiling class template static data 
member 'std::locale::id std::numpunct<_Elem>::id'

()
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 
10.0\VC\include\xlocnum(133): error C2491: 'std::numpunct<_Elem>::id' : 
definition of dllimport static data member not allowed


Joost