Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html with my LyX 1.4.3 (21/09/2006). Is there any workaround to this annoying bug? Can't I tell LyX manually somehow to call pdflatex again after calling bibtex? Isn't there a python-file where I can just add a line and things work? After all, there are so many different export types, each of which must be told what to do somehow. I haven't found the bug in bugzilla, so is it already fixed? Thanks for your help, Holger
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Holger Mayer wrote: Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html That link seems to be broken, so I'm not entirely sure what the problem is. with my LyX 1.4.3 (21/09/2006). Is there any workaround to this annoying bug? Can't I tell LyX manually somehow to call pdflatex again after calling bibtex? Isn't there a python-file where I can just add a line and things work? After all, there are so many different export types, each of which must be told what to do somehow. I haven't found the bug in bugzilla, so is it already fixed? Thanks for your help, Holger Is this definitely a LyX problem? Have you exported the document to a LaTeX file and successfully compiled it manually? The reason I ask is that sometimes an incorrect entry in a BibTeX file causes missing references without giving any fatal compile errors. /Paul
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 19:09 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: Holger Mayer wrote: Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html That link seems to be broken, so I'm not entirely sure what the problem is. Try this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users%40lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html The previous one does not work if you read this post via gmane, because gmane mangles the @. This link is identical, but the @ is replaced by %40 (which is the @ encoded for urls). Georg
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Georg Baum wrote: Try this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users%40lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html The previous one does not work if you read this post via gmane, because gmane mangles the @. This link is identical, but the @ is replaced by %40 (which is the @ encoded for urls). Vielen Danke. Turns out it's probably not the problem I thought it was (and it's not one I've ever encountered). Maybe running LyX in debug mode would help identify whether the correct number of runs are being done and, if not, why not. Does LyX skip the bibtex run if a .bbl file already exists and there have been no changes to the bibliography in the LyX doc? /Paul
Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html with my LyX 1.4.3 (21/09/2006). Is there any workaround to this annoying bug? Can't I tell LyX manually somehow to call pdflatex again after calling bibtex? Isn't there a python-file where I can just add a line and things work? After all, there are so many different export types, each of which must be told what to do somehow. I haven't found the bug in bugzilla, so is it already fixed? Thanks for your help, Holger
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Holger Mayer wrote: Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html That link seems to be broken, so I'm not entirely sure what the problem is. with my LyX 1.4.3 (21/09/2006). Is there any workaround to this annoying bug? Can't I tell LyX manually somehow to call pdflatex again after calling bibtex? Isn't there a python-file where I can just add a line and things work? After all, there are so many different export types, each of which must be told what to do somehow. I haven't found the bug in bugzilla, so is it already fixed? Thanks for your help, Holger Is this definitely a LyX problem? Have you exported the document to a LaTeX file and successfully compiled it manually? The reason I ask is that sometimes an incorrect entry in a BibTeX file causes missing references without giving any fatal compile errors. /Paul
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 19:09 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: Holger Mayer wrote: Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html That link seems to be broken, so I'm not entirely sure what the problem is. Try this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users%40lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html The previous one does not work if you read this post via gmane, because gmane mangles the @. This link is identical, but the @ is replaced by %40 (which is the @ encoded for urls). Georg
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Georg Baum wrote: Try this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users%40lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html The previous one does not work if you read this post via gmane, because gmane mangles the @. This link is identical, but the @ is replaced by %40 (which is the @ encoded for urls). Vielen Danke. Turns out it's probably not the problem I thought it was (and it's not one I've ever encountered). Maybe running LyX in debug mode would help identify whether the correct number of runs are being done and, if not, why not. Does LyX skip the bibtex run if a .bbl file already exists and there have been no changes to the bibliography in the LyX doc? /Paul
Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html with my LyX 1.4.3 (21/09/2006). Is there any workaround to this annoying bug? Can't I tell LyX manually somehow to call pdflatex again after calling bibtex? Isn't there a python-file where I can just add a line and things work? After all, there are so many different export types, each of which must be told what to do somehow. I haven't found the bug in bugzilla, so is it already fixed? Thanks for your help, Holger
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Holger Mayer wrote: Hi there, I'm having the same bug as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html That link seems to be broken, so I'm not entirely sure what the problem is. with my LyX 1.4.3 (21/09/2006). Is there any workaround to this annoying bug? Can't I tell LyX manually somehow to call pdflatex again after calling bibtex? Isn't there a python-file where I can just add a line and things work? After all, there are so many different export types, each of which must be told what to do somehow. I haven't found the bug in bugzilla, so is it already fixed? Thanks for your help, Holger Is this definitely a LyX problem? Have you exported the document to a LaTeX file and successfully compiled it manually? The reason I ask is that sometimes an incorrect entry in a BibTeX file causes missing references without giving any fatal compile errors. /Paul
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 19:09 schrieb Paul A. Rubin: > Holger Mayer wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I'm having the same bug as described in > > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html > > That link seems to be broken, so I'm not entirely sure what the problem is. Try this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users%40lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html The previous one does not work if you read this post via gmane, because gmane mangles the @. This link is identical, but the @ is replaced by %40 (which is the @ encoded for urls). Georg
Re: Once more: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Georg Baum wrote: Try this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users%40lists.lyx.org/msg44439.html The previous one does not work if you read this post via gmane, because gmane mangles the @. This link is identical, but the @ is replaced by %40 (which is the @ encoded for urls). Vielen Danke. Turns out it's probably not the problem I thought it was (and it's not one I've ever encountered). Maybe running LyX in debug mode would help identify whether the correct number of runs are being done and, if not, why not. Does LyX skip the bibtex run if a .bbl file already exists and there have been no changes to the bibliography in the LyX doc? /Paul
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2006 03:22 schrieb Fernando Perez: This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I think so, too. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Please do, and enter it at http://bugzilla.lyx.org. It would be great if you could also attach an example document and create step-by-step instructions to reproduce the bug. Georg
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Georg Baum wrote: Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2006 03:22 schrieb Fernando Perez: This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I think so, too. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Please do, and enter it at http://bugzilla.lyx.org. It would be great if you could also attach an example document and create step-by-step instructions to reproduce the bug. OK, I will. I'm not sure I'll be able to post a document, as it's very on and off (the current one where I see it is too big and I can't make it public). I'll try though, and at least I'll explain it well. Thanks. Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2006 03:22 schrieb Fernando Perez: This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I think so, too. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Please do, and enter it at http://bugzilla.lyx.org. It would be great if you could also attach an example document and create step-by-step instructions to reproduce the bug. Georg
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Georg Baum wrote: Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2006 03:22 schrieb Fernando Perez: This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I think so, too. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Please do, and enter it at http://bugzilla.lyx.org. It would be great if you could also attach an example document and create step-by-step instructions to reproduce the bug. OK, I will. I'm not sure I'll be able to post a document, as it's very on and off (the current one where I see it is too big and I can't make it public). I'll try though, and at least I'll explain it well. Thanks. Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2006 03:22 schrieb Fernando Perez: > This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I think so, too. > I guess I should just take it up > on lyx-dev... Please do, and enter it at http://bugzilla.lyx.org. It would be great if you could also attach an example document and create step-by-step instructions to reproduce the bug. Georg
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Georg Baum wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. Januar 2006 03:22 schrieb Fernando Perez: >> This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. > > I think so, too. > >> I guess I should just take it up >> on lyx-dev... > > Please do, and enter it at http://bugzilla.lyx.org. It would be great if > you could also attach an example document and create step-by-step > instructions to reproduce the bug. OK, I will. I'm not sure I'll be able to post a document, as it's very on and off (the current one where I see it is too big and I can't make it public). I'll try though, and at least I'll explain it well. Thanks. Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
David L. Johnson wrote: On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:19:03 -0700 Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. Typically with Latex the first run would generate missing references such as this. If I am running Latex manually, I simply run it twice. That way the appropriate temporary files are generated so that the second run can read them. I thought LyX would do the same thing. It should, and sometimes it does, as I mention below. But the problem is that it misses many times, and requires a no-op fiddle with the bibtex box to realize that it has to make an extra pass. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). Try adding a second Latex run into that makefile. Well, it's not that simple: the makefile calls lyx -e pdf2 master.lyx to make 'master.pdf'. This master file has many subdocuments, EPS figures, and more. To generate the final one manually, I'd have to write out the raw latex, convert all figures from .eps format to .pdf (pdflatex doesn't understand eps figures), etc. That's _precisely_ all the magic and convenience that lyx does for you when you say 'export PDF', but it's borking out on bibtex management. This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
David L. Johnson wrote: On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:19:03 -0700 Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. Typically with Latex the first run would generate missing references such as this. If I am running Latex manually, I simply run it twice. That way the appropriate temporary files are generated so that the second run can read them. I thought LyX would do the same thing. It should, and sometimes it does, as I mention below. But the problem is that it misses many times, and requires a no-op fiddle with the bibtex box to realize that it has to make an extra pass. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). Try adding a second Latex run into that makefile. Well, it's not that simple: the makefile calls lyx -e pdf2 master.lyx to make 'master.pdf'. This master file has many subdocuments, EPS figures, and more. To generate the final one manually, I'd have to write out the raw latex, convert all figures from .eps format to .pdf (pdflatex doesn't understand eps figures), etc. That's _precisely_ all the magic and convenience that lyx does for you when you say 'export PDF', but it's borking out on bibtex management. This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
David L. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:19:03 -0700 > Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I >> try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', >> for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the >> references section is correctly generated. > > Typically with Latex the first run would generate missing references such > as > this. If I am running Latex manually, I simply run it twice. That way > the appropriate temporary files are generated so that the second run can > read them. > > I thought LyX would do the same thing. It should, and sometimes it does, as I mention below. But the problem is that it misses many times, and requires a no-op fiddle with the bibtex box to realize that it has to make an extra pass. >> The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex >> references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different >> style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. >> THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and >> continue. >> >> Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, >> and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being >> developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to >> generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). > > Try adding a second Latex run into that makefile. Well, it's not that simple: the makefile calls lyx -e pdf2 master.lyx to make 'master.pdf'. This master file has many subdocuments, EPS figures, and more. To generate the final one manually, I'd have to write out the raw latex, convert all figures from .eps format to .pdf (pdflatex doesn't understand eps figures), etc. That's _precisely_ all the magic and convenience that lyx does for you when you say 'export PDF', but it's borking out on bibtex management. This is a lyx bug, I'm pretty convinced. I guess I should just take it up on lyx-dev... Cheers, f
Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Hi all, I've searched both bugzilla and the lists for help on this problem, so far without luck. Any hints would be most welcome. I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). I'd be very appreciative of any help or hints. Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:19:03 -0700 Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. Typically with Latex the first run would generate missing references such as this. If I am running Latex manually, I simply run it twice. That way the appropriate temporary files are generated so that the second run can read them. I thought LyX would do the same thing. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). Try adding a second Latex run into that makefile. -- David L. Johnson __o | Business! cried the Ghost. Mankind was my business. The _`\(,_ | common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, (_)/ (_) | and benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business! --Dickens, A Christmas Carol
Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Hi all, I've searched both bugzilla and the lists for help on this problem, so far without luck. Any hints would be most welcome. I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). I'd be very appreciative of any help or hints. Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:19:03 -0700 Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. Typically with Latex the first run would generate missing references such as this. If I am running Latex manually, I simply run it twice. That way the appropriate temporary files are generated so that the second run can read them. I thought LyX would do the same thing. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). Try adding a second Latex run into that makefile. -- David L. Johnson __o | Business! cried the Ghost. Mankind was my business. The _`\(,_ | common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, (_)/ (_) | and benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business! --Dickens, A Christmas Carol
Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
Hi all, I've searched both bugzilla and the lists for help on this problem, so far without luck. Any hints would be most welcome. I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try to export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references section is correctly generated. The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the required PDFs without human intervention). I'd be very appreciative of any help or hints. Cheers, f
Re: Missing references bug: lyx not calling pdflatex again?
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:19:03 -0700 Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a document with a bibtex-generated list of references, and when I try > to > export it to PDF or postscript (via the GUI or with 'lyx -e pdf2', for > example), all the citations appear as [??] marks, though the references > section is correctly generated. Typically with Latex the first run would generate missing references such as this. If I am running Latex manually, I simply run it twice. That way the appropriate temporary files are generated so that the second run can read them. I thought LyX would do the same thing. > > The only workaround I've been able to find is to click on the 'bibtex > references' box at the end, make some trivial change (choose a different > style, or check the 'add to TOC' box), and rerun the PDF/PS generation. THEN, > the numbers appear, and I can revert my trivial change and continue. > > Needless to say, it is incredibly annoying to have to do this every time, and > it breaks my makefile-based workflow (this is a document being developed in > collaboration from many places, so I wrote a makefile to generate all the > required PDFs without human intervention). Try adding a second Latex run into that makefile. -- David L. Johnson __o | "Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The _`\(,_ | common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, (_)/ (_) | and benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!" --Dickens, "A Christmas Carol"
