Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.

I do believe that.

 Feel free to ask further,

Well, I am a bit lost myself...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.

I do believe that.

 Feel free to ask further,

Well, I am a bit lost myself...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.

I do believe that.

> Feel free to ask further,

Well, I am a bit lost myself...

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-30 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi again,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

 
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?

I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed 
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.

Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.

Feel free to ask further,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-30 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and 
typed ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.

Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, 
actually. 

You don't link anything on purpose, it is done during the build process.




Feel free to ask further,
Vinay


Hello,

do a 'ldd lyx-1.2.3  ldd-output.txt' and add it as an attachment to 
your reply.

Im am curios about this since I build lyx-1.2.3 on a SuSE 8.0 that had 3 
different
versions of xforms installed (0.88, 0.89 and 1.0). ldd showed, that 
lyx-1.2.3
was dynamically linked against all three versions of xforms. The configure
process showed, that xforms 1.0.0 was found on the system - it didn't
mention the other two versions.

It seems to me that this could be a bug in the make file.

Ideas?

Michael

--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-30 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi again,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

 
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?

I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed 
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.

Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.

Feel free to ask further,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-30 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and 
typed ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.

Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, 
actually. 

You don't link anything on purpose, it is done during the build process.




Feel free to ask further,
Vinay


Hello,

do a 'ldd lyx-1.2.3  ldd-output.txt' and add it as an attachment to 
your reply.

Im am curios about this since I build lyx-1.2.3 on a SuSE 8.0 that had 3 
different
versions of xforms installed (0.88, 0.89 and 1.0). ldd showed, that 
lyx-1.2.3
was dynamically linked against all three versions of xforms. The configure
process showed, that xforms 1.0.0 was found on the system - it didn't
mention the other two versions.

It seems to me that this could be a bug in the make file.

Ideas?

Michael

--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-30 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi again,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

 
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?

I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed 
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.

Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.

Feel free to ask further,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-30 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and 
typed ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.

Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, 
actually. 

You don't link anything on purpose, it is done during the build process.




Feel free to ask further,
Vinay


Hello,

do a 'ldd lyx-1.2.3 > ldd-output.txt' and add it as an attachment to 
your reply.

Im am curios about this since I build lyx-1.2.3 on a SuSE 8.0 that had 3 
different
versions of xforms installed (0.88, 0.89 and 1.0). ldd showed, that 
lyx-1.2.3
was dynamically linked against all three versions of xforms. The configure
process showed, that xforms 1.0.0 was found on the system - it didn't
mention the other two versions.

It seems to me that this could be a bug in the make file.

Ideas?

Michael

--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi,


Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it 
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also 
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause 
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler 
and gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.

Now I'm facing new difficulties.

1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms 
installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the 
--with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have 
the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?



2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as 
well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According 
to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the 
kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed 
but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good 
solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms 
installation and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses 
my current XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new 
version, right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig 
after make install?

Well, there is progress though... :)

Vinay


Hello,

you need to install the package xformsd to compile anything related to 
xforms.
But you should really update  to xforms1.0 if you can

Michael

--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as 
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced 
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all 
for your help!

ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an 
e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail. Is there a way I can write 
the output to a text file that I can send to you?

Thanks,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:07:30PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an 
 e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail.

[I always thought Netscape was a web browser ;-}]

 Is there a way I can write the output to a text file that I can send to
 you?

Yes. But for ten lines it is ok to put it in the text of the mail
(like select with left button, paste with middle button)

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi,


Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it 
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also 
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause 
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler 
and gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.

Now I'm facing new difficulties.

1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms 
installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the 
--with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have 
the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?



2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as 
well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According 
to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the 
kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed 
but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good 
solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms 
installation and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses 
my current XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new 
version, right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig 
after make install?

Well, there is progress though... :)

Vinay


Hello,

you need to install the package xformsd to compile anything related to 
xforms.
But you should really update  to xforms1.0 if you can

Michael

--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as 
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced 
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all 
for your help!

ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an 
e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail. Is there a way I can write 
the output to a text file that I can send to you?

Thanks,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:07:30PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an 
 e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail.

[I always thought Netscape was a web browser ;-}]

 Is there a way I can write the output to a text file that I can send to
 you?

Yes. But for ten lines it is ok to put it in the text of the mail
(like select with left button, paste with middle button)

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi,


Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it 
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also 
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause 
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler 
and gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.

Now I'm facing new difficulties.

1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms 
installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the 
--with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have 
the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?



2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as 
well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According 
to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the 
kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed 
but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good 
solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms 
installation and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses 
my current XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new 
version, right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig 
after make install?

Well, there is progress though... :)

Vinay


Hello,

you need to install the package xformsd to compile anything related to 
xforms.
But you should really update  to xforms1.0 if you can

Michael

--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as 
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced 
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all 
for your help!

ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an 
e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail. Is there a way I can write 
the output to a text file that I can send to you?

Thanks,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:07:30PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an 
> e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail.

[I always thought Netscape was a web browser ;-}]

> Is there a way I can write the output to a text file that I can send to
> you?

Yes. But for ten lines it is ok to put it in the text of the mail
(like "select with left button", "paste with middle button")

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-28 Thread Thomas Schönhoff
Vinay Ramnath schrieb:


Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for 
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need 
it when I installed the rpm's, but I need it for the compilation. I 
just unpacked the package, there was nothing to install. Perhaps that 
has something to do with it, but it doesn't seem like it, since it 
only complaints about my C++ compiler.

Any idea?
Vinay




Hello,

in every case you are in need of devel-packages of xforms and related  
when recompiling your upgrade!

Thomas




Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Vinay Ramnath wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Andre Poenitz wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
 
 
 Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
 world program?
 
 Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it
 was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also
 installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause
 configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler and
 gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.
 
 Now I'm facing new difficulties.
 
 1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms
 installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the
 --with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have
 the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?
 
 2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as
 well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According
 to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the
 kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed
 but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good
 solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms installation
 and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses my current
 XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new version,
 right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig after make
 install?
 
 Well, there is progress though... :)
 
 Vinay

Hello, Vinay.

Your you should find your xforms library at PATH/libforms.so, where PATH is 
probably /usr/lib but may be /usr/local/lib.
If that doesn't find it, type at the command line
$ find / -name libforms.so*
You may need to run this as root.

Similarly, forms.h should be found in one of /usr/include, /usr/include/X11, 
/usr/local/include or /usr/local/X11/include.

I would recommend (strongly) however, that you consider throwing out xforms 
0.89.1 and replacing it with the newly released xforms 1.0; it fixes many, 
many bugs.

If you are bent on compiling everything, get it from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/xforms-1.0-release.src.rpm

If you don't care about compiling xforms but still want to compile LyX, then 
you'll want
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/libforms-devel-1.0-release.i386.rpm

Finally, if you just want a working LyX, get
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/libforms-1.0-release.i386.rpm
and the appropriate LyX rpm from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.3/

HTH,

-- 
Angus




Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-28 Thread Thomas Schönhoff
Vinay Ramnath schrieb:


Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for 
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need 
it when I installed the rpm's, but I need it for the compilation. I 
just unpacked the package, there was nothing to install. Perhaps that 
has something to do with it, but it doesn't seem like it, since it 
only complaints about my C++ compiler.

Any idea?
Vinay




Hello,

in every case you are in need of devel-packages of xforms and related  
when recompiling your upgrade!

Thomas




Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Vinay Ramnath wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Andre Poenitz wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
 
 
 Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
 world program?
 
 Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it
 was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also
 installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause
 configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler and
 gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.
 
 Now I'm facing new difficulties.
 
 1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms
 installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the
 --with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have
 the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?
 
 2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as
 well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According
 to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the
 kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed
 but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good
 solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms installation
 and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses my current
 XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new version,
 right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig after make
 install?
 
 Well, there is progress though... :)
 
 Vinay

Hello, Vinay.

Your you should find your xforms library at PATH/libforms.so, where PATH is 
probably /usr/lib but may be /usr/local/lib.
If that doesn't find it, type at the command line
$ find / -name libforms.so*
You may need to run this as root.

Similarly, forms.h should be found in one of /usr/include, /usr/include/X11, 
/usr/local/include or /usr/local/X11/include.

I would recommend (strongly) however, that you consider throwing out xforms 
0.89.1 and replacing it with the newly released xforms 1.0; it fixes many, 
many bugs.

If you are bent on compiling everything, get it from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/xforms-1.0-release.src.rpm

If you don't care about compiling xforms but still want to compile LyX, then 
you'll want
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/libforms-devel-1.0-release.i386.rpm

Finally, if you just want a working LyX, get
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/libforms-1.0-release.i386.rpm
and the appropriate LyX rpm from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.3/

HTH,

-- 
Angus




Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-28 Thread Thomas Schönhoff
Vinay Ramnath schrieb:


Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for 
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need 
it when I installed the rpm's, but I need it for the compilation. I 
just unpacked the package, there was nothing to install. Perhaps that 
has something to do with it, but it doesn't seem like it, since it 
only complaints about my C++ compiler.

Any idea?
Vinay




Hello,

in every case you are in need of devel-packages of xforms and related  
when recompiling your upgrade!

Thomas




Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-28 Thread Angus Leeming
Vinay Ramnath wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
>> 
>>>Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
>>>8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
>>>that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
>> 
>> 
>> Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple "hello
>> world" program?
> 
> Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it
> was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also
> installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause
> configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler and
> gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.
> 
> Now I'm facing new difficulties.
> 
> 1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms
> installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the
> --with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have
> the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?
> 
> 2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as
> well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According
> to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the
> kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed
> but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good
> solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms installation
> and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses my current
> XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new version,
> right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig after make
> install?
> 
> Well, there is progress though... :)
> 
> Vinay

Hello, Vinay.

Your you should find your xforms library at PATH/libforms.so, where PATH is 
probably /usr/lib but may be /usr/local/lib.
If that doesn't find it, type at the command line
$ find / -name "libforms.so*"
You may need to run this as root.

Similarly, forms.h should be found in one of /usr/include, /usr/include/X11, 
/usr/local/include or /usr/local/X11/include.

I would recommend (strongly) however, that you consider throwing out xforms 
0.89.1 and replacing it with the newly released xforms 1.0; it fixes many, 
many bugs.

If you are bent on compiling everything, get it from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/xforms-1.0-release.src.rpm

If you don't care about compiling xforms but still want to compile LyX, then 
you'll want
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/libforms-devel-1.0-release.i386.rpm

Finally, if you just want a working LyX, get
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib/libforms-1.0-release.i386.rpm
and the appropriate LyX rpm from
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.3/

HTH,

-- 
Angus




upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi,

until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3, 
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's 
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current 
installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just compile and 
install the new version without removing the old one?

Well, if I do have to remove my previous installation, does that also 
remove my configuration files in /home/vinay/.lyx/ so that I would have 
to back them up?

Thank you,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi,

until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 
1.2.3, of which there only the source code is available on the LyX 
site. That's ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove 
my current installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just 
compile and install the new version without removing the old one?

Well, if I do have to remove my previous installation, does that also 
remove my configuration files in /home/vinay/.lyx/ so that I would 
have to back them up?

Thank you,
Vinay

Hello Vinay,

if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Assuming the configure is sucessful, and make  make install-strip
work, you will find lyx-1.2.3, relyx-1.2.3 and noweb2lyx-1.2.3 in
/usr/local/bin.

Now you can either move those files somewhere in you $PATH
or extend $PATH to include /usr/local/bin.

If you type lyx  you start the old lyx 1.2.1, lyx-1.2.3 will
give you lyx-1.2.3.  The first time you start lyx-1.2.3 an new
directoy .lyx-1.2.3 will be created where your configuration
will be stored. That means that you can leave your old .lyx
untouched, and lyx-1.2.3 will not mess with our old
confuguration.

Question?

Michael



--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi Michael,

Michael Abshoff wrote:
 if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

 ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do, that is,
I remove XForms with rpm -e xforms and install the new version (1.0)
as described in its documentation, would that mess up my current
installation? Would LyX 1.2.1 be able to find and work with the new XForms?


 Assuming the configure is sucessful, and make  make install-strip
 work, you will find lyx-1.2.3, relyx-1.2.3 and noweb2lyx-1.2.3 in
 /usr/local/bin.

 Now you can either move those files somewhere in you $PATH
 or extend $PATH to include /usr/local/bin.

 If you type lyx  you start the old lyx 1.2.1, lyx-1.2.3 will
 give you lyx-1.2.3.  The first time you start lyx-1.2.3 an new
 directoy .lyx-1.2.3 will be created where your configuration
 will be stored. That means that you can leave your old .lyx
 untouched, and lyx-1.2.3 will not mess with our old
 confuguration.

Thank you, this seems to me like a very nice solution. This way I can
keep my old LyX version until I've got the new one the way I like it.

Very nice, thanks a lot,
Vinay






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi ?,

? wrote:

Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene 

Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and 
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want 
1.2.3 very badly, I'll use the rpm.

Thanks anyway,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi Michael,

Michael Abshoff wrote:
 if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

 ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do, that is,
I remove XForms with rpm -e xforms and install the new version (1.0)
as described in its documentation, would that mess up my current
installation? Would LyX 1.2.1 be able to find and work with the new 
XForms?


lyx-1.2.3 works with the old version  of xforms. Installing the 
xforms-1.0.release
from the lyx-developer site worked for me. But you will have to call 
ldconfig
as root to let you system know where the new xforms-1.0 is.

If you delete the old xforms every application dynamically linked 
against ist
will cease to work, so it isn't a good idea if you use more appliacation 
than lyx
that link against it.

After you compile lyx-1.2.3 please send me the output of ldd lyx-1.2.3 
since
I would like to confirm a bug in the linker-script.

Michael

--

Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for 
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it 
when I installed the rpm's, but I need it for the compilation. I just 
unpacked the package, there was nothing to install. Perhaps that has 
something to do with it, but it doesn't seem like it, since it only 
complaints about my C++ compiler.

Any idea?
Vinay






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
 8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
 that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.

Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi Andre,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?


Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early 
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't 
compile there.

Though, gcc has been working. I've compiled WindowMaker with it and some 
dockapps, but perhaps these don't require cc1plus. Anyway, something 
probably broke it. I use SuSE 8.0, so I installed gcc with YaST2. If I 
remove it and install it again, would that fix it?

Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.


Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?


Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it 
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also 
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause 
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler and 
gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.

Now I'm facing new difficulties.

1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms 
installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the 
--with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have 
the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?

2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as 
well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According 
to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the 
kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed 
but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good 
solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms installation 
and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses my current 
XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new version, 
right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig after make 
install?

Well, there is progress though... :)

Vinay






upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi,

until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3, 
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's 
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current 
installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just compile and 
install the new version without removing the old one?

Well, if I do have to remove my previous installation, does that also 
remove my configuration files in /home/vinay/.lyx/ so that I would have 
to back them up?

Thank you,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi,

until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 
1.2.3, of which there only the source code is available on the LyX 
site. That's ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove 
my current installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just 
compile and install the new version without removing the old one?

Well, if I do have to remove my previous installation, does that also 
remove my configuration files in /home/vinay/.lyx/ so that I would 
have to back them up?

Thank you,
Vinay

Hello Vinay,

if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Assuming the configure is sucessful, and make  make install-strip
work, you will find lyx-1.2.3, relyx-1.2.3 and noweb2lyx-1.2.3 in
/usr/local/bin.

Now you can either move those files somewhere in you $PATH
or extend $PATH to include /usr/local/bin.

If you type lyx  you start the old lyx 1.2.1, lyx-1.2.3 will
give you lyx-1.2.3.  The first time you start lyx-1.2.3 an new
directoy .lyx-1.2.3 will be created where your configuration
will be stored. That means that you can leave your old .lyx
untouched, and lyx-1.2.3 will not mess with our old
confuguration.

Question?

Michael



--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi Michael,

Michael Abshoff wrote:
 if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

 ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do, that is,
I remove XForms with rpm -e xforms and install the new version (1.0)
as described in its documentation, would that mess up my current
installation? Would LyX 1.2.1 be able to find and work with the new XForms?


 Assuming the configure is sucessful, and make  make install-strip
 work, you will find lyx-1.2.3, relyx-1.2.3 and noweb2lyx-1.2.3 in
 /usr/local/bin.

 Now you can either move those files somewhere in you $PATH
 or extend $PATH to include /usr/local/bin.

 If you type lyx  you start the old lyx 1.2.1, lyx-1.2.3 will
 give you lyx-1.2.3.  The first time you start lyx-1.2.3 an new
 directoy .lyx-1.2.3 will be created where your configuration
 will be stored. That means that you can leave your old .lyx
 untouched, and lyx-1.2.3 will not mess with our old
 confuguration.

Thank you, this seems to me like a very nice solution. This way I can
keep my old LyX version until I've got the new one the way I like it.

Very nice, thanks a lot,
Vinay






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi ?,

? wrote:

Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene 

Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and 
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want 
1.2.3 very badly, I'll use the rpm.

Thanks anyway,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi Michael,

Michael Abshoff wrote:
 if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

 ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do, that is,
I remove XForms with rpm -e xforms and install the new version (1.0)
as described in its documentation, would that mess up my current
installation? Would LyX 1.2.1 be able to find and work with the new 
XForms?


lyx-1.2.3 works with the old version  of xforms. Installing the 
xforms-1.0.release
from the lyx-developer site worked for me. But you will have to call 
ldconfig
as root to let you system know where the new xforms-1.0 is.

If you delete the old xforms every application dynamically linked 
against ist
will cease to work, so it isn't a good idea if you use more appliacation 
than lyx
that link against it.

After you compile lyx-1.2.3 please send me the output of ldd lyx-1.2.3 
since
I would like to confirm a bug in the linker-script.

Michael

--

Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for 
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it 
when I installed the rpm's, but I need it for the compilation. I just 
unpacked the package, there was nothing to install. Perhaps that has 
something to do with it, but it doesn't seem like it, since it only 
complaints about my C++ compiler.

Any idea?
Vinay






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
 Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
 8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
 that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.

Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi Andre,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?


Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early 
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't 
compile there.

Though, gcc has been working. I've compiled WindowMaker with it and some 
dockapps, but perhaps these don't require cc1plus. Anyway, something 
probably broke it. I use SuSE 8.0, so I installed gcc with YaST2. If I 
remove it and install it again, would that fix it?

Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.


Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?


Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it 
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also 
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause 
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler and 
gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.

Now I'm facing new difficulties.

1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms 
installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the 
--with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have 
the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?

2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as 
well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According 
to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the 
kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed 
but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good 
solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms installation 
and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses my current 
XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new version, 
right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig after make 
install?

Well, there is progress though... :)

Vinay






upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi,

until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3, 
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's 
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current 
installation of LyX, using "rpm -e lyx", or can I just compile and 
install the new version without removing the old one?

Well, if I do have to remove my previous installation, does that also 
remove my configuration files in /home/vinay/.lyx/ so that I would have 
to back them up?

Thank you,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi,

until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 
1.2.3, of which there only the source code is available on the LyX 
site. That's ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove 
my current installation of LyX, using "rpm -e lyx", or can I just 
compile and install the new version without removing the old one?

Well, if I do have to remove my previous installation, does that also 
remove my configuration files in /home/vinay/.lyx/ so that I would 
have to back them up?

Thank you,
Vinay

Hello Vinay,

if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a

./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Assuming the configure is sucessful, and make && make install-strip
work, you will find lyx-1.2.3, relyx-1.2.3 and noweb2lyx-1.2.3 in
/usr/local/bin.

Now you can either move those files somewhere in you $PATH
or extend $PATH to include /usr/local/bin.

If you type "lyx " you start the old lyx 1.2.1, "lyx-1.2.3" will
give you lyx-1.2.3.  The first time you start lyx-1.2.3 an new
directoy .lyx-1.2.3 will be created where your configuration
will be stored. That means that you can leave your old .lyx
untouched, and lyx-1.2.3 will not mess with our old
confuguration.

Question?

Michael



--
Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi Michael,

Michael Abshoff wrote:
> if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
>
> ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do, that is,
I remove XForms with "rpm -e xforms" and install the new version (1.0)
as described in its documentation, would that mess up my current
installation? Would LyX 1.2.1 be able to find and work with the new XForms?

>
> Assuming the configure is sucessful, and make && make install-strip
> work, you will find lyx-1.2.3, relyx-1.2.3 and noweb2lyx-1.2.3 in
> /usr/local/bin.
>
> Now you can either move those files somewhere in you $PATH
> or extend $PATH to include /usr/local/bin.
>
> If you type "lyx " you start the old lyx 1.2.1, "lyx-1.2.3" will
> give you lyx-1.2.3.  The first time you start lyx-1.2.3 an new
> directoy .lyx-1.2.3 will be created where your configuration
> will be stored. That means that you can leave your old .lyx
> untouched, and lyx-1.2.3 will not mess with our old
> confuguration.

Thank you, this seems to me like a very nice solution. This way I can
keep my old LyX version until I've got the new one the way I like it.

Very nice, thanks a lot,
Vinay






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi ?,

? wrote:

Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene 

Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and 
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want 
1.2.3 very badly, I'll use the rpm.

Thanks anyway,
Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Abshoff
Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Hi Michael,

Michael Abshoff wrote:
> if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
>
> ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3

Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do, that is,
I remove XForms with "rpm -e xforms" and install the new version (1.0)
as described in its documentation, would that mess up my current
installation? Would LyX 1.2.1 be able to find and work with the new 
XForms?


lyx-1.2.3 works with the old version  of xforms. Installing the 
xforms-1.0.release
from the lyx-developer site worked for me. But you will have to call 
"ldconfig"
as root to let you system know where the new xforms-1.0 is.

If you delete the old xforms every application dynamically linked 
against ist
will cease to work, so it isn't a good idea if you use more appliacation 
than lyx
that link against it.

After you compile lyx-1.2.3 please send me the output of "ldd lyx-1.2.3" 
since
I would like to confirm a bug in the linker-script.

Michael

--

Michael Abshoff - MRB - Universität Dortmund - Telefon 755-3463 (intern)

  Where do you want to RTFM today?





Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for 
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it 
when I installed the rpm's, but I need it for the compilation. I just 
unpacked the package, there was nothing to install. Perhaps that has 
something to do with it, but it doesn't seem like it, since it only 
complaints about my C++ compiler.

Any idea?
Vinay






Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
> 8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
> that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.

Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple "hello
world" program?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi Andre,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple "hello
world" program?


Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early 
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't 
compile there.

Though, gcc has been working. I've compiled WindowMaker with it and some 
dockapps, but perhaps these don't require cc1plus. Anyway, something 
probably broke it. I use SuSE 8.0, so I installed gcc with YaST2. If I 
remove it and install it again, would that fix it?

Vinay



Re: upgrading 1.2.1 rpm to 1.2.3

2003-01-27 Thread Vinay Ramnath
Hi,

Andre Poenitz wrote:

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:


Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE 
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints 
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.


Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple "hello
world" program?


Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it 
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also 
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause 
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C compiler and 
gpp as my C++ compiler, I needed both.

Now I'm facing new difficulties.

1. It can not find libforms or libxforms. Since I do have XForms 
installed, the 0.89-1 rpm, I have to direct it there with the 
--with-extra-lib option, according to the INSTALL file. I do not have 
the faintest idea where these files should be. Could you help?

2. It cannot find forms.h. I suppose they should be part of XForms as 
well. Might there be something wrong with my XForms package? According 
to the INSTALL file, this could be the case if I haven't installed the 
kernel sources. Does that mean that I shouldn't have the rpm installed 
but have compiled it from source code instead? Do you have a good 
solution for this. If I do have to remove my current XForms installation 
and install it from source instead, LyX 1.2.1, which uses my current 
XForms, might not work anymore, even if I install the new version, 
right? Or will everything go fine as long as i run ldconfig after make 
install?

Well, there is progress though... :)

Vinay