Re: [Mesa-dev] misc pahole repacking
On 1 February 2018 at 11:13, Adrian M Negreanuwrote: > There's a bug about quiting on unsupported tags: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348200 > > Should be fixed in v1.10 > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dwarves.git/commit/?h=f25 > Seems like distros should update their package and upstream URLs [1]. pahole v1.11 has been out for 7 months ;-) Alternatively one can build/install it locally - it requires libelf/libdwarf and zlib. -Emil [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] misc pahole repacking
There's a bug about quiting on unsupported tags: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348200 Should be fixed in v1.10 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dwarves.git/commit/?h=f25 On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Brian Paulwrote: > On 01/31/2018 01:48 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli >> >> (I verified the 1st one and I trust you on the 2nd one.) >> >> BTW I witnessed pahole crashing when processing visit() methods of >> ir_print_visitor class, did you experience that? My pahole version is 1.9, >> it dies in /lib64/libdwarves.so.1 after some prints like: >> >> --- 8< --- >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x122be84> not handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_unspecified_type (0x3b) @ <0x1230c68> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x12312d3> not handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_unspecified_type (0x3b) @ <0x1231bc4> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x12340bb> not handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x123f984> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242348> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242398> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12423e8> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242572> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12425c2> not >> handled! >> die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12425ea> not >> handled! >> die__process_function: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1247929> >> not handled! >> > > Me too. I have v1.9 as well and it crashes pretty quickly, for example: > > $ pahole build-llvmpipe/lib/gallium/libGL.so.1.5.0 > struct xm_driver { > struct pipe_screen * (*create_pipe_screen)(Display *); /* > 0 8 */ > struct st_api *(*create_st_api)(void); /* 8 8 > */ > > /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */ > /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */ > }; > struct sw_winsys { > void (*destroy)(struct sw_winsys *); /* > 0 8 */ > boolean(*is_displaytarget_format_supported)(struct > sw_winsys *, unsigned int, enum pipe_format); /* 8 8 */ > struct sw_displaytarget * (*displaytarget_create)(struct > sw_winsys *, unsigned int, enum pipe_format, unsigned int, unsigned int, > unsigned int, const void *, unsigned int *); /*16 8 */ > struct sw_displaytarget * (*displaytarget_from_handle)(struct > sw_winsys *, const struct pipe_resource *, struct winsys_handle *, > unsigned int *); /*24 8 */ > boolean(*displaytarget_get_handle)(struct > sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *, struct winsys_handle *); /*32 >8 */ > void * (*displaytarget_map)(struct sw_winsys > *, struct sw_displaytarget *, unsigned int); /*40 8 */ > void (*displaytarget_unmap)(struct sw_winsys > *, struct sw_displaytarget *); /*48 8 */ > void (*displaytarget_display)(struct > sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *, void *, struct pipe_box *); /* > 56 8 */ > /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ > void (*displaytarget_destroy)(struct > sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *); /*64 8 */ > > /* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 9 */ > /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */ > }; > die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x3b09> not handled! > > -Brian > > > >> >> >> On 31.01.2018 01:41, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >>> This month's Dave hasn't got enough sleep to do real work, lets >>> repack some structs. >>> >>> The format descriptions one is quite good though it reduces the >>> radv binary data segment. >>> >>> Dave. >>> >>> ___ >>> mesa-dev mailing list >>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >>> >>> ___ >> mesa-dev mailing list >> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >> > > ___ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] misc pahole repacking
On 01/31/2018 01:48 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote: Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli(I verified the 1st one and I trust you on the 2nd one.) BTW I witnessed pahole crashing when processing visit() methods of ir_print_visitor class, did you experience that? My pahole version is 1.9, it dies in /lib64/libdwarves.so.1 after some prints like: --- 8< --- die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x122be84> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_unspecified_type (0x3b) @ <0x1230c68> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x12312d3> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_unspecified_type (0x3b) @ <0x1231bc4> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x12340bb> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x123f984> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242348> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242398> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12423e8> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242572> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12425c2> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12425ea> not handled! die__process_function: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1247929> not handled! Me too. I have v1.9 as well and it crashes pretty quickly, for example: $ pahole build-llvmpipe/lib/gallium/libGL.so.1.5.0 struct xm_driver { struct pipe_screen * (*create_pipe_screen)(Display *); /* 0 8 */ struct st_api *(*create_st_api)(void); /* 8 8 */ /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */ /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */ }; struct sw_winsys { void (*destroy)(struct sw_winsys *); /* 0 8 */ boolean(*is_displaytarget_format_supported)(struct sw_winsys *, unsigned int, enum pipe_format); /* 8 8 */ struct sw_displaytarget * (*displaytarget_create)(struct sw_winsys *, unsigned int, enum pipe_format, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, const void *, unsigned int *); /*16 8 */ struct sw_displaytarget * (*displaytarget_from_handle)(struct sw_winsys *, const struct pipe_resource *, struct winsys_handle *, unsigned int *); /*24 8 */ boolean(*displaytarget_get_handle)(struct sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *, struct winsys_handle *); /*32 8 */ void * (*displaytarget_map)(struct sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *, unsigned int); /*40 8 */ void (*displaytarget_unmap)(struct sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *); /*48 8 */ void (*displaytarget_display)(struct sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *, void *, struct pipe_box *); /*56 8 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ void (*displaytarget_destroy)(struct sw_winsys *, struct sw_displaytarget *); /*64 8 */ /* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 9 */ /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */ }; die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x3b09> not handled! -Brian On 31.01.2018 01:41, Dave Airlie wrote: This month's Dave hasn't got enough sleep to do real work, lets repack some structs. The format descriptions one is quite good though it reduces the radv binary data segment. Dave. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] misc pahole repacking
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli(I verified the 1st one and I trust you on the 2nd one.) BTW I witnessed pahole crashing when processing visit() methods of ir_print_visitor class, did you experience that? My pahole version is 1.9, it dies in /lib64/libdwarves.so.1 after some prints like: --- 8< --- die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x122be84> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_unspecified_type (0x3b) @ <0x1230c68> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x12312d3> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_unspecified_type (0x3b) @ <0x1231bc4> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_restrict_type (0x37) @ <0x12340bb> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x123f984> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242348> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242398> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12423e8> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1242572> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12425c2> not handled! die__process_unit: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x12425ea> not handled! die__process_function: DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type (0x42) @ <0x1247929> not handled! On 31.01.2018 01:41, Dave Airlie wrote: This month's Dave hasn't got enough sleep to do real work, lets repack some structs. The format descriptions one is quite good though it reduces the radv binary data segment. Dave. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] misc pahole repacking
This month's Dave hasn't got enough sleep to do real work, lets repack some structs. The format descriptions one is quite good though it reduces the radv binary data segment. Dave. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev