Re: [uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

2006-09-22 Thread David Janes

Blogger is changing their template format. No word on hAtom [1]

Regards, etc...
David

[1] http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/09/02/on-open-letter-to-blogger/

On 9/21/06, Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I definately vote picking one standard and sticking to it.  As with
date formats, this may cause problems (ie, on blogger I still can't
use proper hAtom), but this is the sort of thing that may be dealt
with LATER in a MATURE uF community (or at least a mature uF).
Parsers like only having one format to work with.  Let people display
what they will, the machine-readable should be consolidated.

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew
Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

[on why the use of rel=bookmark links in :

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/newATOM.htm

might be incorrect)

I'd be grateful for a consensus, or at least others' thoughts, on this,
please, before I mark-up the rest of the page.

Your ultimate purpose is to syndicate updates to the site, yes?

Yes.

hAtom is perfect for this.  It might require you to tweak the format
slightly. One possibility:

  tr class=hentry
 th scope=rowabbr class=updated title=2006-09-2121
September/abbr/th
 tdspan class=entry-titleUpdated Bibliography/entry-
title: span class=entry-contentDetails and images of the two
revised editions of a href=biblio/worcs.htm#BirdsOfMalvernBirds  of
the Malvern District/a added to our bibliography/span./td
  /tr

  tr class=hentry
th scope=rowabbr class=updated title=2006-09-2121
September/abbr/th
tdspan class=entry-titleSeptember 2006 Bulletin/span:
span class=entry-contentOur a href=../bulletin/
index.htm#b434September 2006 Bulletin/a is out now./span/td
  /tr

Thank you, but that simply isn't going top happen. I'm not going to
start repeating content on the page, just o shoehorn it into an
otherwise-incompatible microformat. I thought the whole point of
microformats is that there should be no need to do so?
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread David Janes

Honestly, exactly right. hAtom works for what you're doing; don't get
over caught up in the meaning of bookmark or whatever. If could
potentially create an RSS/Atom feed for the page, you'll be able to
put hAtom markup on it.

Regards, etc...
David

On 9/22/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thank you, but that simply isn't going top happen. I'm not going to
start repeating content on the page, just o shoehorn it into an
otherwise-incompatible microformat. I thought the whole point of
microformats is that there should be no need to do so?

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Messina

For hatom converters, see Chris Casciano's work:

http://placenamehere.com/mf/

Chris

On 9/22/06, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

All the '@' stuff is derived elements that are for ... other purposes ...

I believe there's someone doing hAtom - feed converters; I've avoided
that (even though it's a very useful service) because I don't want to
push the meme that the purpose of hAtom is to compete with existing
syndication formats.

Regards, etc...
David

On 9/21/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], David
 Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

  http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/newATOM.htm

  The AUMP http://tools.blogmatrix.com/extract/ gives Python errors,
  which, I presume are to do with it, rather than my mark-up. If not, then
  they're not very user friendly!

 Fixed

 Thank you. That was quick!

 How does it look now ?
 http://tinyurl.com/ntorg

 Better.

 How does my markup look to you?

 Why are the parent classes (center t70 - legacy!) captured?



 Is there an on-line tool which will enable me to enter the above URL and
 thereby subscribe to an RSS feed?

 --
 Andy Mabbett
 Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

 Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
 ___
 microformats-discuss mailing list
 microformats-discuss@microformats.org
 http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
Chris Messina
Citizen Provocateur 
 Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work: http://citizenagency.com
Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell: 412 225-1051
Skype: factoryjoe
This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] basic include pattern question

2006-09-22 Thread Ben Ward

On 22 Sep 2006, at 02:26, Michael McCracken wrote:

Should
I just repeat the info that I want displayed?


Yes. The include pattern (both the OBJECT and rel-include variants)  
allows you to point a microformat to some other piece of data  
published already in the page, for the purpose of *not* repeating  
information. So for example, I could fix up my website with hAtom for  
blog entries, and rather than repeat my hCard in every entry, just  
use the include pattern to point to the fulll hCard in my sidebar  
each time (although hAtom has handling for that anyway, so that  
example is slightly mute).


Anyway, in situations where you want information to be included and  
displayed in the page it should be written directly as content. The  
include patterns in µf are for parsing when you *don't* want to  
display repeated data.


Ben
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Messina

For the sake of discussion, I started a page of demos (done offline,
so I might be wrong in some of my code) for various tagcloud
techniques...

http://factorycity.net/demos/microformats/htagcloud/

I'll go download John's original page so that I incorporate his examples.

Chris

On 9/21/06, Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 you should be able to derive a
 pie chart from the data embedded in this microformat! ;)

That would be pretty cool ;)  But for that, how useful is it to
actually store the data in the class attributes?  class is how uF
finds data and names fields, but for data storage (especially numeric
data like this) it seems odd... especially since you're then storing
data invisibly to the user.  I think tagclouds need to use class for
styling to work (as has been said, for IE), but the uF needs to store
in title or inside a tag (as is pretty much uF 'tradition'), to make
the data easier to access both for computers AND the user.
   -- Singpolyma
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
Chris Messina
Citizen Provocateur 
 Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work: http://citizenagency.com
Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell: 412 225-1051
Skype: factoryjoe
This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread Frances Berriman

Just curious - but why aren't we using the uF wiki?

On 9/22/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

For the sake of discussion, I started a page of demos (done offline,
so I might be wrong in some of my code) for various tagcloud
techniques...

http://factorycity.net/demos/microformats/htagcloud/

I'll go download John's original page so that I incorporate his examples.

Chris

On 9/21/06, Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  you should be able to derive a
  pie chart from the data embedded in this microformat! ;)

 That would be pretty cool ;)  But for that, how useful is it to
 actually store the data in the class attributes?  class is how uF
 finds data and names fields, but for data storage (especially numeric
 data like this) it seems odd... especially since you're then storing
 data invisibly to the user.  I think tagclouds need to use class for
 styling to work (as has been said, for IE), but the uF needs to store
 in title or inside a tag (as is pretty much uF 'tradition'), to make
 the data easier to access both for computers AND the user.
-- Singpolyma
 ___
 microformats-discuss mailing list
 microformats-discuss@microformats.org
 http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss



--
Chris Messina
Citizen Provocateur 
  Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work: http://citizenagency.com
Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell: 412 225-1051
Skype: factoryjoe
This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
Frances Berriman
http://www.fberriman.com
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Messina

Because I wrote this up when I was on a plane. ;)

Does the mF wiki support inline CSS and all the tags we need?

Chris

On 9/22/06, Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Just curious - but why aren't we using the uF wiki?

On 9/22/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 For the sake of discussion, I started a page of demos (done offline,
 so I might be wrong in some of my code) for various tagcloud
 techniques...

 http://factorycity.net/demos/microformats/htagcloud/

 I'll go download John's original page so that I incorporate his examples.

 Chris

 On 9/21/06, Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   you should be able to derive a
   pie chart from the data embedded in this microformat! ;)
 
  That would be pretty cool ;)  But for that, how useful is it to
  actually store the data in the class attributes?  class is how uF
  finds data and names fields, but for data storage (especially numeric
  data like this) it seems odd... especially since you're then storing
  data invisibly to the user.  I think tagclouds need to use class for
  styling to work (as has been said, for IE), but the uF needs to store
  in title or inside a tag (as is pretty much uF 'tradition'), to make
  the data easier to access both for computers AND the user.
 -- Singpolyma
  ___
  microformats-discuss mailing list
  microformats-discuss@microformats.org
  http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
 


 --
 Chris Messina
 Citizen Provocateur 
   Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
 Work: http://citizenagency.com
 Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
 Cell: 412 225-1051
 Skype: factoryjoe
 This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
 ___
 microformats-discuss mailing list
 microformats-discuss@microformats.org
 http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss



--
Frances Berriman
http://www.fberriman.com
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
Chris Messina
Citizen Provocateur 
 Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work: http://citizenagency.com
Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell: 412 225-1051
Skype: factoryjoe
This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread Frances Berriman

Nah - I meant this whole hTagCloud progression (examples off-site
makes perfect sense).  It all seems off-site at the mo.

And that's dedication, Chris. :)

On 9/22/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Because I wrote this up when I was on a plane. ;)

Does the mF wiki support inline CSS and all the tags we need?

Chris

On 9/22/06, Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just curious - but why aren't we using the uF wiki?

 On 9/22/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  For the sake of discussion, I started a page of demos (done offline,
  so I might be wrong in some of my code) for various tagcloud
  techniques...
 
  http://factorycity.net/demos/microformats/htagcloud/
 
  I'll go download John's original page so that I incorporate his examples.
 
  Chris
 
  On 9/21/06, Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you should be able to derive a
pie chart from the data embedded in this microformat! ;)
  
   That would be pretty cool ;)  But for that, how useful is it to
   actually store the data in the class attributes?  class is how uF
   finds data and names fields, but for data storage (especially numeric
   data like this) it seems odd... especially since you're then storing
   data invisibly to the user.  I think tagclouds need to use class for
   styling to work (as has been said, for IE), but the uF needs to store
   in title or inside a tag (as is pretty much uF 'tradition'), to make
   the data easier to access both for computers AND the user.
  -- Singpolyma
   ___
   microformats-discuss mailing list
   microformats-discuss@microformats.org
   http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
  
 
 
  --
  Chris Messina
  Citizen Provocateur 
Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
  Work: http://citizenagency.com
  Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
  Cell: 412 225-1051
  Skype: factoryjoe
  This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
  ___
  microformats-discuss mailing list
  microformats-discuss@microformats.org
  http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
 


 --
 Frances Berriman
 http://www.fberriman.com
 ___
 microformats-discuss mailing list
 microformats-discuss@microformats.org
 http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss



--
Chris Messina
Citizen Provocateur 
  Open Source Ambassador-at-Large
Work: http://citizenagency.com
Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog
Cell: 412 225-1051
Skype: factoryjoe
This email is:   [ ] bloggable[X] ask first   [ ] private
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
Frances Berriman
http://www.fberriman.com
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread John Allsopp

Frances,


Nah - I meant this whole hTagCloud progression (examples off-site
makes perfect sense).  It all seems off-site at the mo.


It may well have reached the stage of warranting pages at the wiki. I  
think that the process doesn't really spell out exactly when the  
pages should be created, and by whom, so perhaps I've erred on the  
side of caution here, it's my nature not to presume that the proposal  
warranted the creation of the pages just yet.


j


John Allsopp

style master :: css editor :: http://westciv.com/style_master
blog :: dog or higher :: http://blogs.westciv.com/dog_or_higher
WebPatterns :: http://webpatterns.org
Web Directions Conference :: Sydney September 28-29 :: http://wd06.com


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: Re: Re: Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread Frances Berriman

On 9/22/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

True -- but as we're in the proposal stage, it's not too bad...
however, we do need a tagcloud-brainstorming page on the wiki with all
of John's research.



True. :) imo, it's always valuable to have a page you can point to
with all the current research - no matter how useless it might end up
being in the end, so that new thinkers can pick it up and add to it
easily.

Thanks for answering my query though.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Re: a very early draft proposal hTagcloud

2006-09-22 Thread John Allsopp

Frances and Chris,


On 9/22/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

True -- but as we're in the proposal stage, it's not too bad...
however, we do need a tagcloud-brainstorming page on the wiki with  
all

of John's research.



True. :) imo, it's always valuable to have a page you can point to
with all the current research - no matter how useless it might end up
being in the end, so that new thinkers can pick it up and add to it
easily.


I've just set up

http://microformats.org/wiki/tagcloud-brainstorming
http://microformats.org/wiki/tagcloud-examples

Does anyone have some tips/tools for converting HTML to Wiki? All the  
brainstorming, research etc I've done is in HTML.


Thanks

j

John Allsopp

style master :: css editor :: http://westciv.com/style_master
blog :: dog or higher :: http://blogs.westciv.com/dog_or_higher
WebPatterns :: http://webpatterns.org
Web Directions Conference :: Sydney September 28-29 :: http://wd06.com


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


[uf-discuss] question about currency amounts in tables

2006-09-22 Thread Guillaume Lebleu
Should the currency amount mF proposal include support for 
representation of currency-qualified values in a table format?


If so, take a look at: http://investor.google.com/fin_data.html

As you can see, it would not make sense to have the currency repeated 
for each piece of data. Instead, it should be provided once at the table 
level, and then a td may override the default value.


What do you think?

Guillaume
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Avoiding duplicate data on one page; and same-page URL references.

2006-09-22 Thread Ryan King


On Sep 20, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


I feel that there should be some way to declare, at the start of the
page, that all the events have the summary WMBC Birmingham Branch  
field

trip and use the URL of that page - all data which is available to
visitors to the latter page, albeit not once for each event.


All of these events do what?

-ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Ryan King

On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)


No. :-P

-ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

2006-09-22 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux

Hello Andy,

On 9/21/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Charles
Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 What I'm arguing is that... we should throw an iso4127 class name in
 there too so that other currency codes (besides ISO 4127) could be
 used too without (potentially) breaking this or other Semantic HTML
 systems (that either exist now or will exist in the future) for
 marking up currency.

 What currency code uses CDN for Canadian dollars - or we going to have
 people inventing their own currency codes, too?

Well... I use CDN.  (I'm Canadian BTW.)  Until I read the ISO 4127
spec, I don't think I've noticed CAD being used.  But I've seen
CDN all over the place.

Even at the currency exchage stores (that I've been to) I believe they
use CDN.

It's a defacto standard.  (Just because ISO doesn't give CDN its
blessing and tells people to use CAD doesn't mean people will.)

I'm not disputing that it's used; you've said ...other currency codes
(besides ISO 4127) could be used...; and I'm asking what currency code
uses CDN. Seems you can't name one.


I think I understand you question now.

The answer is that I do NOT think this is any body like ISO or ANSI
that has CDN as a currency code.

It is only a defacto standard used by Canadians.  (And maybe others...
but I don't have enough info to confirm or deny that.)



See ya

--
   Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

   charles @ reptile.ca
   supercanadian @ gmail.com

   developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
___
Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/

___
Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing...   http://tirebiterz.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Citation: next steps?

2006-09-22 Thread Bruce D'Arcus

On 9/22/06, Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


That is the most straightforward way, yes. The problem I have with it
is the repeated role term will be displayed for every contributor, and
will likely end up being more hidden data.


No, I'm saying have two main terms: creator and contributor.

Only add a role when it actually needs to be displayed (which is not
the case for an author). Using creator for author is fine.

Bruce
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

2006-09-22 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux

Hello David,

Just out of curiosity, was this inside or outside of Canada?

On 9/21/06, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'll just jump in here: I've worked in finance, treasury, risk
management and banking for the last 10 years. I've only seen CAD used
technically to refer to Canadian dollars and anyone, from a
banking/finance _technical_ perspective, is probably mostly interested
in consuming that form of currency information.

Regards, etc...
David

On 9/21/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 On 9/21/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charles
  Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
 
  What I'm arguing is that... we should throw an iso4127 class name in
  there too so that other currency codes (besides ISO 4127) could be
  used too without (potentially) breaking this or other Semantic HTML
  systems (that either exist now or will exist in the future) for
  marking up currency.
 
  What currency code uses CDN for Canadian dollars - or we going to have
  people inventing their own currency codes, too?

 Well... I use CDN.  (I'm Canadian BTW.)  Until I read the ISO 4127
 spec, I don't think I've noticed CAD being used.  But I've seen
 CDN all over the place.

 Even at the currency exchage stores (that I've been to) I believe they
 use CDN.

 It's a defacto standard.  (Just because ISO doesn't give CDN its
 blessing and tells people to use CAD doesn't mean people will.)

 As far as people inventing their own currency codes an
 organization like ISO or ANSI creating standards codes is really no
 different from any group doing it.  They are just groups of people.

 After all... if you want to exclude one group... the W3C might say
 that we here at Microformats.org should not be allowed to create web
 standards.  (We basically say f*** you.  We don't need your blessing.)


 Why not make the standard we are creating be extensible (by making the
 type of currency code being used be marked explicitly... with the
 iso4127 class in our case)?

 That way it will be useful to more people.  (That way it will be
 useful to people who aren't using ISO 4127 cods.)  And thus this
 Microformat will have a better chance of being used.  (Also, it can
 make it so that different groups won't have conflicting ways of
 marking up currency.  And we won't get a big mess.)


 So... I'm NOT saying that we should NOT use ISO 4127 codes.  (I
 actually think we should use them.)  I'm just saying that we should
 mark that we are using ISO 4127 codes (via a iso4127 class) so that
 people can use other currency codes too (and not have a bid confused
 mess).


 See ya



--
   Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

   charles @ reptile.ca
   supercanadian @ gmail.com

   developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
___
Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/

___
Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing...   http://tirebiterz.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] hCard question

2006-09-22 Thread David Janes

I've changed:

However, for some properties there is a more semantic equivalent, and
therefore they get special treatment, e.g.:

to:

However, some properties have a better semantic equivalent and
therefore should be encoded as follows:

Regards, etc...

On 9/22/06, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:41 AM, David Janes wrote:

 OK thanks both. So this section saying that url, email and photo get
 special treatment [1] should be consider as additive to the
 previous definitions and not replacive [2]

 Regards, etc...

 [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#More_Semantic_Equivalents
 [2] someday I hope to be quoted in a dictionary as the coiner of
 replacive

Right, those rules are in addition to plain text parsing. They don't
replace that.

If you can, please come up with some short explanatory text to add
there.

thanks,
ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

2006-09-22 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux

Hello Scott,

On 9/21/06, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sep 21, 2006, at 9:32 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:

 Parsers like only having one format to work with.  Let people display
 what they will, the machine-readable should be consolidated.

I agree.  Publishers also like having only one format to work with.


But sometimes they change their mind on what that single standard
format should be.

At one time, everyone wanted to use RFC 822 dates.  (Like Thu, 21 Dec
2000 16:01:07 +0200.)  But no longer.  Now everyone wants to use ISO
8601 dates.  (Like 2004-02-12T15:19:21+00:00.)  In the future people
could change their mind yet again.

For currencies... We could specify one standard currency -- ISO 4127 3
letter codes -- for now (which would make these people happy).  But
also think to the future about if people change out minds (and don't
want to use ISO 4127 anymore) and just add the iso4127 class in there
so we can gracefully migrate in the future.


See ya

--
   Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

   charles @ reptile.ca
   supercanadian @ gmail.com

   developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
___
Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/

___
Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing...   http://tirebiterz.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

How does this look:

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/newATOM.htm

I've only marked up the first two entries for 21 September.

I've now done the lot, and moved the results to:

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/new.htm

and the continuation page:

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/site/new-2006.htm

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

2006-09-22 Thread Scott Reynen

On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:


For currencies... We could specify one standard currency -- ISO 4127 3
letter codes -- for now (which would make these people happy).  But
also think to the future about if people change out minds (and don't
want to use ISO 4127 anymore) and just add the iso4127 class in there
so we can gracefully migrate in the future.


It sounds like you're suggesting we put a profile in the class  
attribute.  HTML already provides a mechanism for specifying the  
exact meaning of the markup:


http://microformats.org/wiki/profile-uris

If what we mean by class=currency changes, we can indicate that by  
using a different profile.


Peace,
Scott
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Avoiding duplicate data on one page; and same-page URL references.

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 I feel that there should be some way to declare, at the start of the
 page, that all the events have the summary WMBC Birmingham Branch
field
 trip and use the URL of that page - all data which is available to
 visitors to the latter page, albeit not once for each event.

All of these events do what?

I don't understand your question.
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
 Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)

No. :-P

So, are you going to tell us which bit(s) you disagree with, or is it a
secret?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Scott Reynen

On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Ryan King wrote:


On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)


No. :-P


Andy, if you're eager to move these discussions forward more quickly,  
you might find it helpful to move some of them to the IRC channel,  
where three emails in a day can be reduced to three messages in a  
minute:


http://microformats.org/wiki/irc

It would also be good to bring more interested people into the  
discussions, e.g. more people who work in finance for currency, more  
people who work in bioscience for species.


Peace,
Scott
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Scott Reynen

On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)


No. :-P


So, are you going to tell us which bit(s) you disagree with, or is  
it a

secret?


Neither.  It's something we haven't all had the time to look at yet.   
If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,  
which comes before brainstorming in the process.  I don't know much  
about biology (like Sam Cooke), but a quick Google search brought up  
this:


http://www.uni-kl.de/FB-Biologie/AG-Hakenbeck/TGrebe/HPK/Table1.htm

So I assume there's more prior work in this area.  And if there's  
not, we should document the lack as well.


Peace,
Scott
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Tantek Çelik
On 9/22/06 12:24 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
 King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
 
 On Sep 21, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
 Shall I take everyone's silence as complete agreement? ;-)
 
 No. :-P
 
 So, are you going to tell us which bit(s) you disagree with, or is it a
 secret?

I think the point is that silence != agreement nor disagreement.

Silence = disinterest, which is actually worse than disagreement.

The point of any standard is to interoperate between multiple interested
parties.  If there is only one party, no need for a standard (i.e.
microformat).  Instead, just experiment with semantic XHTML and semantic
class names, document your experiments and see if more interest shows up in
the future.

This is something we deliberately recognize with microformats, and try to
solve 80/20 type problems, where there is already a lot of interest in
publishing and sharing information of the particular type on the Web.  There
is obviously a very wide spectrum of interest in types of data, but we
prioritize those at the 80/20 heavy-use side of the spectrum (hence people,
companies, events, reviews, citations etc.) while allowing/encouraging
research of more esoteric or less frequently used/published data types
(species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.

Thanks,

Tantek

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


[uf-discuss] Another hAtom check, please

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett

I've marked-up another page with hAtom:

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/ladywalk/latest.htm

using the format:

li class=hentry

abbr class=updated entry-title title=2006-09-20
20th
/abbr
:

span class=entry-content
[text]
/span
/li

All seems well, except that the AUMP reports the entry title of such
an entry as 20th, where I would have expected it to be 2006-09-20.

Am I right? Is the hAtom markup correct?

Any other observations will be welcome.
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.

2006-09-22 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux

Hello Scott,

On 9/22/06, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:

 For currencies... We could specify one standard currency -- ISO 4127 3
 letter codes -- for now (which would make these people happy).  But
 also think to the future about if people change out minds (and don't
 want to use ISO 4127 anymore) and just add the iso4127 class in there
 so we can gracefully migrate in the future.

It sounds like you're suggesting we put a profile in the class
attribute.  HTML already provides a mechanism for specifying the
exact meaning of the markup:

http://microformats.org/wiki/profile-uris

If what we mean by class=currency changes, we can indicate that by
using a different profile.


Yeah That could be a solution.

Although it might not solve cases where someone wants to have more
than one style of currency code on the same page... but we could
ignore that due to the 80/20 principle we've been going by.


See ya


--
   Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

   charles @ reptile.ca
   supercanadian @ gmail.com

   developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
___
Make Televisionhttp://maketelevision.com/

___
Cars, Motorcycles, Trucks, and Racing...   http://tirebiterz.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.

Are you sure about that?

 I don't know much  about biology (like Sam Cooke), but a quick Google
search brought up  this:

http://www.uni-kl.de/FB-Biologie/AG-Hakenbeck/TGrebe/HPK/Table1.htm

Thanks, but there's nothing relevant there.

So I assume there's more prior work in this area.  And if there's  not,
we should document the lack as well.

I think there may be some. Ever heard of Linneaus? ;-)

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Scott Reynen

On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.


Are you sure about that?


I'm sure this is what the process page says:

http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Pages_to_consider_creating

A pattern has emerged from successful microformat development  
efforts of several specific kinds of wiki pages being created, in a  
particular order (though not always). [...] If you're unable to come  
up with material for the pages, then you should probably reconsider  
whether or not the problem is worth (or ready for) solving.


1. *-examples [...]
2. *-formats [...]
3. *-brainstorming [...]

2 still comes before 3, right?

Peace,
Scott
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Andy, if you're eager to move these discussions forward more quickly,
you might find it helpful to move some of them to the IRC channel,
where three emails in a day can be reduced to three messages in a
minute:

http://microformats.org/wiki/irc

Thank you, but I very rarely use IRC for a number of reasons.

Also, is it sensible to divide debate between at least three media -
mailing list, wiki and IRC?

It would also be good to bring more interested people into the
discussions, e.g. more people who work in finance for currency, more
people who work in bioscience for species.

Indeed. In don't know anyone in finance (I have some standards! ;-) );
and I have had some interest from people interested in taxonomy, but
they're not likely to get involved in what they see as a geeky debate.
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Use of abbr (also object) and Accessibility

2006-09-22 Thread Stephen Paul Weber

Typical use of dates (not times) in prose omit the year,

Nonsense.


Hardly.  Few people use a year when giving a date that is close to the
current date.  It's assumed.  Either way it doesn't affect the
discussion though... It's still an abbreviation.


--
- Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
http://www.awriterz.org

MSN/GTalk/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ/AIM: 103332966
NSA: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread Stephen Paul Weber

rel=bookmark translates to the link in RSS... so whatever you want
in link, use rel=bookmark on

On 9/22/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew
Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

[on why the use of rel=bookmark links in :

http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/newATOM.htm

might be incorrect)

I'd be grateful for a consensus, or at least others' thoughts, on this,
please, before I mark-up the rest of the page.

Your ultimate purpose is to syndicate updates to the site, yes?

Yes.

hAtom is perfect for this.  It might require you to tweak the format
slightly. One possibility:

  tr class=hentry
 th scope=rowabbr class=updated title=2006-09-2121
September/abbr/th
 tdspan class=entry-titleUpdated Bibliography/entry-
title: span class=entry-contentDetails and images of the two
revised editions of a href=biblio/worcs.htm#BirdsOfMalvernBirds  of
the Malvern District/a added to our bibliography/span./td
  /tr

  tr class=hentry
th scope=rowabbr class=updated title=2006-09-2121
September/abbr/th
tdspan class=entry-titleSeptember 2006 Bulletin/span:
span class=entry-contentOur a href=../bulletin/
index.htm#b434September 2006 Bulletin/a is out now./span/td
  /tr

Thank you, but that simply isn't going top happen. I'm not going to
start repeating content on the page, just o shoehorn it into an
otherwise-incompatible microformat. I thought the whole point of
microformats is that there should be no need to do so?
--
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
- Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
http://www.awriterz.org

MSN/GTalk/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ/AIM: 103332966
NSA: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread Stephen Paul Weber

The first http://xoxotools.ning.com/hatom2rss.php is my site, I will
look into making your requested tweak to the script :)

On 9/22/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen
Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Try:

 http://xoxotools.ning.com/hatom2rss.php

Thank you.

(has a slight problem with
 your page because you have tags in your title, which isn't allowed in
 RSS... try putting BOTH entry-title AND entry-content on the data :)
 )

That would bloat it somewhat. Perhaps it would be better if the tool
simply ignored anchor tags (but not their content)?


 or

 http://tools.microformatic.com/help/xhtml/hatom/ (no idea how it'll
 work, supports both RSS and ATOM [ick] output)

That seems to barf, on:


http://tools.microformatic.com/transcode/RSS/hatom/http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/newATOM.htm

(aka http://tinyurl.com/keb82)

I suspect that it's expecting something more like:


http://tools.microformatic.com/transcode/RSS/hatom/http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/new/

(i.e. without .htm)


Are either of those your sites, or should I contact them separately?

--
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
- Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
http://www.awriterz.org

MSN/GTalk/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ/AIM: 103332966
NSA: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
 which comes before brainstorming in the process.

 Are you sure about that?

I'm sure this is what the process page says:

http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Pages_to_consider_creating

A pattern has emerged from successful microformat development  efforts
of several specific kinds of wiki pages being created, in a  particular
order (though not always). [...] If you're unable to come  up with
material for the pages, then you should probably reconsider  whether or
not the problem is worth (or ready for) solving.

1. *-examples [...]
2. *-formats [...]
3. *-brainstorming [...]

So, does that mean you're not (or no longer) sure about your earlier
claim?

2 still comes before 3, right?

Yes. But that's not the issue. Interesting debating technique, though.
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Use of abbr (also object) and Accessibility

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen
Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 Typical use of dates (not times) in prose omit the year,

 Nonsense.

Hardly.  Few people use a year when giving a date that is close to the
current date.

Who said anything about close to the current date?

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Tentative proposal for What's New listings

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

The first http://xoxotools.ning.com/hatom2rss.php is my site, I will
look into making your requested tweak to the script :)

No charge ;-)

(Seriously - thank you. Please let me/ us know when it's done.)

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Another hAtom check, please

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

On 9/22/06, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've marked-up another page with hAtom:

 http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/ladywalk/latest.htm

 using the format:

 li class=hentry

 abbr class=updated entry-title title=2006-09-20
 20th
 /abbr
 :

 span class=entry-content
 [text]
 /span
 /li

 All seems well, except that the AUMP reports the entry title of such
 an entry as 20th, where I would have expected it to be 2006-09-20.

AUMFP is correct. It doesn't let abbr be an all purpose content
hider. This trick might work to your satisfacation:

span class=entry-content entry-title.../span

Thank you, but no. The data in the content is not suitable for use in
the title (and vice versa).

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Scott Reynen

On Sep 22, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


If you get bored waiting, you could fill in a species-formats page,
which comes before brainstorming in the process.


Are you sure about that?


I'm sure this is what the process page says:

http://microformats.org/wiki/process#Pages_to_consider_creating

A pattern has emerged from successful microformat development   
efforts
of several specific kinds of wiki pages being created, in a   
particular

order (though not always). [...] If you're unable to come  up with
material for the pages, then you should probably reconsider   
whether or

not the problem is worth (or ready for) solving.

1. *-examples [...]
2. *-formats [...]
3. *-brainstorming [...]


So, does that mean you're not (or no longer) sure about your earlier
claim?


I'm not really sure what you're asking.  I don't know how one could  
read the process page in the wiki and not conclude that formats comes  
before brainstorming in the process.  But I didn't write the process,  
so I'll leave it to whoever did to explain it with the certainty you  
apparently require.


Peace,
Scott
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Proposal: species

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

allowing/encouraging research of more esoteric or less frequently
used/published data types (species, moon/mars geolocations) on the Web.

Do you *really* think that species names are esoteric? *boggle*
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Avoiding duplicate data on one page; and same-page URL references.

2006-09-22 Thread Ryan King

On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes


I feel that there should be some way to declare, at the start of the
page, that all the events have the summary WMBC Birmingham Branch
field
trip and use the URL of that page - all data which is available to
visitors to the latter page, albeit not once for each event.


All of these events do what?


I don't understand your question.


I don't understand your above statement.

You say ...there should be some way to declare, at the start of the  
page, that all events... [matching these conditions]...


What are you declaring about these events?

-ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Another hAtom check, please

2006-09-22 Thread Ryan King

On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:27 PM, David Janes wrote:


AUMFP is correct. It doesn't let abbr be an all purpose content
hider. This trick might work to your satisfacation:


That's not the way other implementations work. Or other microformats,  
for that matter. Did you write something specific for hAtom about this?


-ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Another hAtom check, please

2006-09-22 Thread David Janes

Did something change or did I misinterpret a spec? Can I do this?

abbr class=entry-content title=Here's the real entry content even
though it's not visible to the user but it's what I want the computer
to see
This text appears in the browser but when we parse the document it
will disappear.
/abbr

Regards, etc...

On 9/22/06, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:27 PM, David Janes wrote:

 AUMFP is correct. It doesn't let abbr be an all purpose content
 hider. This trick might work to your satisfacation:

That's not the way other implementations work. Or other microformats,
for that matter. Did you write something specific for hAtom about this?

-ryan
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Use of abbr (also object) and Accessibility

2006-09-22 Thread Scott Reynen

On Sep 22, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:


Typical use of dates (not times) in prose omit the year,


Nonsense.


Hardly.  Few people use a year when giving a date that is close to  
the

current date.


Who said anything about close to the current date?


Most events on the web lack are published close to the date they  
occur.  As a result, most published events on the web lack a year.   
Most events on the web are published for an audience in the immediate  
vicinity of the publisher.  As a result, most published events on the  
web lack a time zone.  These two combined mean the published event  
date is almost always less complicated than the ISO 8601 version of  
the same date.  The less complicated version is treated as an  
abbreviation of the more complicated version, just as DVD is a less  
complicated abbreviation of Digital Video Disc.


For examples, looking at the first five live examples for hCalendar  
in the wiki, the first four published dates (I couldn't find a date  
on one) are:


6 octobre 20h00
Tuesday 26th September 9.00am
9 September at 7:30pm
Thursday 7th September 2006

All but one of these lack a published year.  All of them lack a  
published time zone.  So all are less complicated than the ISO 8601  
version of the dates.  Which of these is not an abbreviation of the  
equivalent ISO 8601 date?  I'm not seeing the problem here.


Peace,
Scott
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Use of abbr (also object) and Accessibility

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 Typical use of dates (not times) in prose omit the year,

 Nonsense.

 Hardly.  Few people use a year when giving a date that is close to
the
 current date.

 Who said anything about close to the current date?

[...]

That would be no-one, then.
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


[uf-discuss] New wiki page: FireFox Extensions

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett


Does what it says on the tin:

http://microformats.org/wiki/firefox-extensions

-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Avoiding duplicate data on one page; and same-page URL references.

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
 King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 I feel that there should be some way to declare, at the start of the
 page, that all the events have the summary WMBC Birmingham Branch
 field
 trip and use the URL of that page - all data which is available to
 visitors to the latter page, albeit not once for each event.

 All of these events do what?

 I don't understand your question.

I don't understand your above statement.

You say ...there should be some way to declare, at the start of the
page, that all events... [matching these conditions]...

What are you declaring about these events?

That they are WMBC Birmingham Branch field trips; and thus that the
summary for each event is WMBC Birmingham Branch field trip.

Have you seen my first post in this thread?


-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


[uf-discuss] [citation] Call for scope check (was Re: Citation: next steps?)

2006-09-22 Thread Ryan Cannon
Why aren't we looking for an established format to fulfill our 80/20  
requirement and become a

good 1:1 scope?

BibTex does authors like this,

@article {
  Author = {Vicente, Kim J. and Rasmussen, Jens}
  ...
}

While EndNote does it like this:

record
  contributors
authors
  authorVicente, Kim J./author
  authorRasmussen, Jens/author
/authors
  /contributors
  ...
/record

BibDesk[1] also exports the following:

dd class=Pub
  span class=AuthorVicente, Kim J. and Rasmussen, Jensspan
  ...
/dd

Perhaps instead of wheel reinvention, we should look to one of these  
well-used citation formats.
Is there any reason why neither BibTex nor EndNote fields are listed  
in the citation-examples
page of the wiki? They seem the closest thing to what we're looking  
for, i.e. BibTex could be to
hCite what vCard is to hCard. Blithely creating our own format seems  
reckless and doomed to

obscurity.

[1]: http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/

--
Ryan Cannon

Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com



On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Michael McCracken  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On 9/22/06, Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 9/22/06, Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That is the most straightforward way, yes. The problem I have  
with it
is the repeated role term will be displayed for every  
contributor, and

will likely end up being more hidden data.


No, I'm saying have two main terms: creator and contributor.

Only add a role when it actually needs to be displayed (which is not
the case for an author). Using creator for author is fine.


So you're saying that for the common case where creator is clear
enough, it'd look like this:

span class=citation
  span class=creator vcardauthor1/span
  span class=creator vcardauthor2/span
  span class=title article title/span
...
/span

And then only use 'role' where necessary to clear things up?

I like that, and now I see where you said it earlier, but I missed  
it then.


This sounds like a good solution. What does everyone else think?

Also, what's the next issue to resolve before we can put out a draft?
-mike

--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/



___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] New wiki page: FireFox Extensions

2006-09-22 Thread Tantek Çelik
On 9/22/06 4:35 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Does what it says on the tin:
 
   http://microformats.org/wiki/firefox-extensions

Thanks creating this page Andy.

Note also the Greasemonkey page:

 http://microformats.org/wiki/greasemonkey

Perhaps these two can be combined or related/linked in some way?

Thanks,

Tantek

___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] [citation] Call for scope check (was Re: Citation: next steps?)

2006-09-22 Thread Tantek Çelik
On 9/22/06 4:48 PM, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why aren't we looking for an established format to fulfill our 80/20
 requirement and become a
 good 1:1 scope?

We are.  There is much debate about which format to re-use existing property
names etc. from.


 Perhaps instead of wheel reinvention, we should look to one of these
 well-used citation formats.
 Is there any reason why neither BibTex nor EndNote fields are listed
 in the citation-examples
 page of the wiki?

That's what the citation-formats page is for.  Pre-existing formats such as
BibTex and EndNote.

 http://microformats.org/wiki/citation-formats

Thanks,

Tantek


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] Use of abbr (also object) and Accessibility

2006-09-22 Thread Maciej Stachowiak


I'm replying a bit out of order here since I only just subscribed to  
this list.



In message C138691F.7B722%tantek at cs.stanford.edu, Tantek Çelik  
tantek at cs.stanford.edu wrote:


OBJECT has been problematic in Safari for quite some time, and  
still is

AFAIK.


I think you may be basing this on out-of-date information, as the  
current Safari 1.3 and Safari 2.0 have pretty good object support.


In terms of bug-reporting, I'd suggest pointing the Safari team at  
the draft

HTML 4.01 test suite to *at least* pass all the test cases there.

 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Test/HTML401/current/


Many of these tests are outright wrong. For example, no browser that  
I tested, including Mac IE, passes the following test. And what it is  
testing does not appear to be at all justified by the HTML 4.01 spec:


http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Test/HTML401/current/tests/sec13_3-BF-01.html

That being said, there does appear to be a genuine bug with falling  
back from img objects that point to a broken image. I filed it as


http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10992


http://tantek.com/log/2005/01.html#d26t0100

Following the descriptions contained within that post, it is  
trivial to
construct perhaps a half dozen or so OBJECT test cases which Safari  
fails.


In current Safari, object data=20050125January 25/object works  
just fine as expected. As to your other earlier points:


* It doesn't handle object fallbacks -- Current Safari handles  
object fallbacks fine.
* it doesn't know when not to handle object mime types that it  
doesn't support -- I'm not sure what this means, but you do get  
fallback on an unsupported MIME type.
* it doesn't support display:inline on object -- It certainly  
does, in fact this is the default display type for object.
* it doesn't do proper intrinsic sizing of object replaced  
elements -- It does for image types as long as you specify the  
content type correctly. Which I think is the only case where this is  
relevant.


It is true that a lot of this didn't work as well in previous Safari  
versions. We would also be happy to fix any remaining object (or  
other) bugs that impede microformat design. Please let us know if you  
have specific ones to report.


Regards,
Maciej

P.S. In the case of dates I think abbr is a better choice than  
object since object is much more heavyweight in terms of  
implementation. I wouldn't recommend the use of object unless you  
actually intend to embed content from an external resource.


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] New wiki page: FireFox Extensions

2006-09-22 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 Does what it says on the tin:

   http://microformats.org/wiki/firefox-extensions

Thanks creating this page Andy.

Note also the Greasemonkey page:

 http://microformats.org/wiki/greasemonkey

Perhaps these two can be combined or related/linked in some way?

Done (under see also).
-- 
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards:  http://www.no2id.net/

Free Our Data:  http://www.freeourdata.org.uk
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss


Re: [uf-discuss] [citation] Call for scope check (was Re: Citation: next steps?)

2006-09-22 Thread Michael McCracken

On 9/22/06, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

They seem the closest thing to what we're looking

for, i.e. BibTex could be to
hCite what vCard is to hCard. Blithely creating our own format seems
reckless and doomed to
obscurity.


I've certainly invested a lot of time and effort in BibTeX - I wrote
BibDesk** - so I can sympathize with not wanting to reinvent that
wheel, but it's been pointed out convincingly enough to me that BibTeX
does not cover 80% of usage on the web right now. If you think it does
(as I did) you just need to look outside your research area. See the
list archives for examples of things BibTeX handles poorly - patents,
case law, works of art, etc.

You do make the important point that choosing wisely from existing
property-naming schemes is critical for adoption. This week's
discussion of marking up contributors is an example of the tension
between that and needing to be flexible enough for actual uses on the
web, as documented in citation-examples.

Right now it looks like the consensus (of people who have had time to
post) is that erring slightly on the side of flexibility (as opposed
to copying the most familiar property names) *in the case of the
people involved in a cited work*, is the way to go.

-mike

**- Originally.. BibDesk since about version 1.0 has been largely the
work of the estimable Adam Maxwell and Christiaan Hofman...


On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Michael McCracken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 9/22/06, Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 9/22/06, Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 That is the most straightforward way, yes. The problem I have
 with it
 is the repeated role term will be displayed for every
 contributor, and
 will likely end up being more hidden data.

 No, I'm saying have two main terms: creator and contributor.

 Only add a role when it actually needs to be displayed (which is not
 the case for an author). Using creator for author is fine.

 So you're saying that for the common case where creator is clear
 enough, it'd look like this:

 span class=citation
   span class=creator vcardauthor1/span
   span class=creator vcardauthor2/span
   span class=title article title/span
 ...
 /span

 And then only use 'role' where necessary to clear things up?

 I like that, and now I see where you said it earlier, but I missed
 it then.

 This sounds like a good solution. What does everyone else think?

 Also, what's the next issue to resolve before we can put out a draft?
 -mike

 --
 Michael McCracken
 UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
 research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
 misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/


___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss




--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss