Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

2017-04-13 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
Note I most cases, they don’t’ modify them, so get their upstream communities 
and see if it affects traffic.  I.e. they may pass through to their upstream 
without issues.



Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:14 PM
To: Nick Bright <nick.bri...@valnet.net>; Mikrotik Users 
<mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

If you want to get into more details off list that will be fine...

BGP-Communities is not some magical thing, it is a Custom Defined 
feature/functionality that a provider can choose to implement or not to.. it 
only helps in doing traffic management automatically by their down stream 
customers..

There are a number of providers who don't have BGP Communities implemented for 
their down-stream customer use, however they may be willing to do some specific 
traffic engineering that one may desire ..

Otherwise, it is what it is.

:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net<mailto:supp...@snappytelecom.net>


From: "Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users" 
<mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
To: "Mikrotik Users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:28:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP
On 4/10/2017 1:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
hint... not sure who are your ISP's but in some cases, you can use bgp 
communities for their upstream (as long as they do not filter or overwrite the 
communities) to have the desired affect.
Unfortunately that isn't an option, because of the topology. The issue is that 
a significant amount of the traffic comes from a source directly connected to 
an intermediary network, before it reaches Tier 1 Internet; and that 
intermediary network is the one that is declining to offer support for BGP 
communities.

It's the same reason that path pre-pending isn't working well either.

--

---

-  Nick Bright-

-  Vice President of Technology   -

-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -

-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -

-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -

---

- Are your files safe?-

- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -

- More information & 30 day free trial at -

- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -

---



This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited 
from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise 
using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please 
promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message 
from your system.

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org<mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

2017-04-13 Thread Faisal Imtiaz via Mikrotik-users
If you want to get into more details off list that will be fine... 

BGP-Communities is not some magical thing, it is a Custom Defined 
feature/functionality that a provider can choose to implement or not to.. it 
only helps in doing traffic management automatically by their down stream 
customers.. 

There are a number of providers who don't have BGP Communities implemented for 
their down-stream customer use, however they may be willing to do some specific 
traffic engineering that one may desire .. 

Otherwise, it is what it is. 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> To: "Mikrotik Users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:28:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

> On 4/10/2017 1:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:

>> hint... not sure who are your ISP's but in some cases, you can use bgp
>> communities for their upstream (as long as they do not filter or overwrite 
>> the
>> communities) to have the desired affect.

> Unfortunately that isn't an option, because of the topology. The issue is 
> that a
> significant amount of the traffic comes from a source directly connected to an
> intermediary network, before it reaches Tier 1 Internet; and that intermediary
> network is the one that is declining to offer support for BGP communities.

> It's the same reason that path pre-pending isn't working well either.
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---

> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
> addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information
> that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited
> from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or 
> otherwise
> using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please
> promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message
> from your system.

> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

2017-04-13 Thread Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users

On 4/10/2017 1:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
hint... not sure who are your ISP's but in some cases, you can use bgp 
communities for their upstream (as long as they do not filter or 
overwrite the communities) to have the desired affect.
Unfortunately that isn't an option, because of the topology. The issue 
is that a significant amount of the traffic comes from a source directly 
connected to an intermediary network, before it reaches Tier 1 Internet; 
and that intermediary network is the one that is declining to offer 
support for BGP communities.


It's the same reason that path pre-pending isn't working well either.

--
---
-  Nick Bright-
-  Vice President of Technology   -
-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
---
- Are your files safe?-
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
---

This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited 
from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise 
using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please 
promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message 
from your system.

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


Re: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

2017-04-10 Thread Faisal Imtiaz via Mikrotik-users
Let's get into the nitty gritty of things... 

I am going to start backwards 

1) you should have IP Address on loopback interfaces on each of the routers. 

2) you should have an igrp protocol running between all of these routers so 
that they can reach each other's Loopback Address (OSPF is best) 

3) your three routers should be running iBGP mesh between each other, i.e. two 
ibgp sessions on each router, each of those sessions to the other two 
(a.k.a. route reflector settings, in regards to the bgp instance, where the 
update source is the loopback ip ). 
so now you should have a bgp table on each of the three routers, and they 
should be able to see all the different routes which are reachable via the 
other router.. 

4) once you have all of the above setup, then you can do traffic engineering... 
keep in mind, in-bound traffic engineering is done via, bgp communities, asn 
prepends, etc 
out-bound traffic innerspring is done via local pref settings. 

hint... not sure who are your ISP's but in some cases, you can use bgp 
communities for their upstream (as long as they do not filter or overwrite the 
communities) to have the desired affect. 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users" <mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 11:51:39 AM
> Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

> Greetings,

> I'm working on a bit of BGP configuration that I'm having trouble making work 
> as
> I'd like.
> There are three routers involved:

> 1. RouterA - connected to Primary Tier 1 ISP, does BGP with ISP-A.

>1. I share this router with another WISP (we split the connection), so 
> this
> router does BGP with ISP-A, the other WISP, and my edge router
> 2.
> RouterB - does BGP with RouterA, and connects to my network. 3. RouterC -
> does BGP with Secondary Tier 2 ISP (backup path), does BGP with ISP-B

>1. Connects to the network the same way Router B does, and is 
> connected to
>RouterB in the same switched network in the same subnet e.g. they are 
> directly
> adjacent in the topology.

> All three routers have the same ASN (mine).

> My desired configuration is that ISP-A is the preferred ISP for all traffic,
> unless ISP-A is unavailable (the most likely scenario being the 11GHz backhaul
> between RouterA and RouterB going down), in that case RouterC should function
> as the gateway to ISP-B.

> Some issues to overcome in configuring this are:

>* ISP-B doesn't provide any BGP Communities for which to set "Backup route"
> preference
>* Path Prepending doesn't work, because ISP-B is better connected to 
> numerous
>sources of significant traffic; and even prepending as many as 16 hops, is
> still preferred. If prepending was going to work, that many should do it.

> When I peer RouterB and RouterC, RouterA either doesn't receive the routes 
> from
> Router C; or receives them, but the Next Hop is Router C's IP address; which
> Router A invalidates the route, because it's not directly attached.

> I'm sure that I'm just doing something incorrectly, but I haven't been able to
> identify what. Any suggestions?
> --
> ---
> -  Nick Bright-
> -  Vice President of Technology   -
> -  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
> -  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
> -  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
> ---
> - Are your files safe?-
> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
> ---

> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
> addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information
> that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited
> from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or 
> otherwise
> using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please
> promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message
> from your system.

> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


[Mikrotik Users] Multi-hop BGP

2017-04-10 Thread Nick Bright via Mikrotik-users

Greetings,

I'm working on a bit of BGP configuration that I'm having trouble making 
work as I'd like.


There are three routers involved:

1. RouterA - connected to Primary Tier 1 ISP, does BGP with ISP-A.
1. I share this router with another WISP (we split the connection),
   so this router does BGP with ISP-A, the other WISP, and my edge
   router
2. RouterB - does BGP with RouterA, and connects to my network.
3. RouterC - does BGP with Secondary Tier 2 ISP (backup path), does BGP
   with ISP-B
1. Connects to the network the same way Router B does, and is
   connected to RouterB in the same switched network in the same
   subnet e.g. they are directly adjacent in the topology.

All three routers have the same ASN (mine).

My desired configuration is that ISP-A is the preferred ISP for all 
traffic, unless ISP-A is unavailable (the most likely scenario being the 
11GHz backhaul between RouterA and RouterB going down), in that case 
RouterC should function as the gateway to ISP-B.


Some issues to overcome in configuring this are:

 * ISP-B doesn't provide any BGP Communities for which to set "Backup
   route" preference
 * Path Prepending doesn't work, because ISP-B is better connected to
   numerous sources of significant traffic; and even prepending as many
   as 16 hops, is still preferred. If prepending was going to work,
   that many should do it.

When I peer RouterB and RouterC, RouterA either doesn't receive the 
routes from Router C; or receives them, but the Next Hop is Router C's 
IP address; which Router A invalidates the route, because it's not 
directly attached.


I'm sure that I'm just doing something incorrectly, but I haven't been 
able to identify what. Any suggestions?


--
---
-  Nick Bright-
-  Vice President of Technology   -
-  Valnet -=- We Connect You -=-  -
-  Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789  -
-  Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
---
- Are your files safe?-
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup  -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
---

This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the 
addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information 
that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited 
from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise 
using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please 
promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message 
from your system.

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users