Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Aaron Stellman
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
 Generalization is always false.
 I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of OpenVPN  
And what makes you so sure that this was exact cause? Another
generalization.



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Tony Abernethy
Markus Hennecke wrote:
 Marco Peereboom schrieb:
  I work with people that run io tools against flash parts.  
 I still have
  to see it fail too.  Your puny little firewall will never 
 write more to
  it than a month long stress test.  This write fatigue 
 argument is very
  silly.
 
 Generalization is always false.
self-reference ?-)  

 I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging 
 of OpenVPN 
 Connections from WLAN Clients which unfortunately had power saving 
 enabled and dropped the connection every few minutes. Took me 
 around 2 
 or 3 weeks, I just forgot to reduce the log level. Perhaps 
 those stress 
 tests are not stressing enough? That Card was a little bit older, but 
 seldom used, so there is a good chance that that scenario no 
 longer applies.
 
 Kind regards,
Markus
 
Many writes, all on the same spot, like directory entry?



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Markus Hennecke

Aaron Stellman schrieb:

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:

Generalization is always false.
I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of OpenVPN  

And what makes you so sure that this was exact cause? Another
generalization.


The inode holding the log files metadata was no longer writeable. What 
else would cause that?


Kind regards,
  Markus



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Markus Hennecke

Tony Abernethy schrieb:
I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging 
of OpenVPN 
Connections from WLAN Clients which unfortunately had power saving 
enabled and dropped the connection every few minutes. Took me 
around 2 
or 3 weeks, I just forgot to reduce the log level. Perhaps 
those stress 
tests are not stressing enough? That Card was a little bit older, but 
seldom used, so there is a good chance that that scenario no 
longer applies.



Many writes, all on the same spot, like directory entry?


Right.

Kind regards,
  Markus



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Aaron Stellman
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:19:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
 Aaron Stellman schrieb:
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
 Generalization is always false.
 I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of 
 OpenVPN  
 And what makes you so sure that this was exact cause? Another
 generalization.

 The inode holding the log files metadata was no longer writeable. What  
 else would cause that?
I don't know what the cause is, and there is no point speculating. what
matters is that you made a conclusion based on sample of grand total of
1 case -- that's a pretty bad generalization.
Then you instantiate your previous generalization and accuse others of not
stress testing enough.



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Markus Hennecke

Aaron Stellman schrieb:

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:19:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:

Aaron Stellman schrieb:

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:

Generalization is always false.
I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of 
OpenVPN  

And what makes you so sure that this was exact cause? Another
generalization.
The inode holding the log files metadata was no longer writeable. What  
else would cause that?

I don't know what the cause is, and there is no point speculating.


So you are saying that there is no relation in writing many times to one 
inode and the block containing the inode no longer writeable? This seems 
obvious to me because flash memory is involved. Perhaps you can give a 
better explaination?



what
matters is that you made a conclusion based on sample of grand total of
1 case -- that's a pretty bad generalization.


So what? Marco made a statement that he has seen no flash memory fail 
because of writing to it. I have seen it fail once. So the general 
statement flash memory does not fail because of writing can't be true 
from my expirience. Thats why I wrote that generalizations are always 
false. Do I have to add smileys to that sentence?



Then you instantiate your previous generalization and accuse others of not
stress testing enough.


Oh, come on. Pointing out that there may be some use case of flash 
memory (writing to one block over and over again) that makes it fail is 
an accusation? Are you serious?


Kind regards,
  Markus



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Tony Abernethy
Aaron Stellman wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:19:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
  Aaron Stellman schrieb:
  On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
  Generalization is always false.
  I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of 
  OpenVPN  
  And what makes you so sure that this was exact cause? Another
  generalization.
 
  The inode holding the log files metadata was no longer 
 writeable. What  
  else would cause that?
 I don't know what the cause is, and there is no point 
 speculating. what
 matters is that you made a conclusion based on sample of 
 grand total of
 1 case -- that's a pretty bad generalization.
 Then you instantiate your previous generalization and accuse 
 others of not
 stress testing enough.
 
A sample size of one is quite sufficient in a number of cases:
banging on a jar of nitroglycerin.
(many) repetitive writes to one spot on the disk.
The problem is that that one needs to be the right one.



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
 The inode holding the log files metadata was no longer writeable.
 What  else would cause that?
 I don't know what the cause is, and there is no point speculating.

 So you are saying that there is no relation in writing many times to one
 inode and the block containing the inode no longer writeable? This seems
 obvious to me because flash memory is involved. Perhaps you can give a
 better explaination?

No better explanation, but flash tends to move stuff around (dynamic
remapping of blocks) to avoid writing the same block over and over
again. They do this precisely to avoid the problem you describe.

 what
 matters is that you made a conclusion based on sample of grand total of
 1 case -- that's a pretty bad generalization.

 So what? Marco made a statement that he has seen no flash memory fail
 because of writing to it. I have seen it fail once. So the general
 statement flash memory does not fail because of writing can't be true
 from my expirience. Thats why I wrote that generalizations are always
 false. Do I have to add smileys to that sentence?

I think people are mostly amused by your generalization that
generalizations are always false. At least, I was. I think you
should've topped it off with an except this one.

 Then you instantiate your previous generalization and accuse others of not
 stress testing enough.

 Oh, come on. Pointing out that there may be some use case of flash
 memory (writing to one block over and over again) that makes it fail is
 an accusation? Are you serious?

It's not easy to write to one block over and over again on dynamically
remapping flash media, but you can force this (fill all blocks except
one and then rewrite it over and over again).

(Not arguing that it is or is not possible to break flash storage by
repeated writing, just pointing out some technicallities)

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

--
[++-]+++.+++[---].+++[+
+++-].++[-]+.--.[-]
 http://www.weirdnet.nl/



Re: I can't download OpenBSD 4.5, 550 /pub/OpenBSD/4.5: Permission denied.

2009-04-17 Thread Andreas Angerer
---
a.angerer log, stardate: 04/16/2009 11:05 PM
following transmission from  Bob Beck 

 
 That's funny. it works for me.. I wonder what your issue is?
 
 -Bob

*lol*

Thank you Bob.
Best answer for this question.

Regards Andreas



4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

2009-04-17 Thread zpo
4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread RJ45
it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface

I think this problem has no solution...

thanks


On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Matthew Dempsky wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, RJ45 r...@slacknet.com wrote:
 I cannot use the same vlan name and I need an unique name because
 I must runa a dhcp server on  vlan.
 If I have t ocreate a new vlanName for each vr1 vr2 and vr3
 how do I run a dhcpd on interface vlan100 ?

 I think what Henning is suggesting is to do something like:

 ifconfig vlan1100 vlan 100 vlandev vr1
 ifconfig vlan2100 vlan 100 vlandev vr2
 ifconfig vlan3100 vlan 100 vlandev vr3
 ifconfig bridge100 create
 brconfig bridge100 add vlan1100
 brconfig bridge100 add vlan2100
 brconfig bridge100 add vlan3100
 ifconfig bridge100 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
 dhcpd bridge100

 (Untested, probably missing some steps.)



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Daniel Ouellet

RJ45 wrote:

it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface

I think this problem has no solution...


See below, you still can have IP address to interface, use bridge and 
vlan as well. I do.



thanks


On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Matthew Dempsky wrote:


On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, RJ45 r...@slacknet.com wrote:

I cannot use the same vlan name and I need an unique name because
I must runa a dhcp server on  vlan.
If I have t ocreate a new vlanName for each vr1 vr2 and vr3
how do I run a dhcpd on interface vlan100 ?

I think what Henning is suggesting is to do something like:

ifconfig vlan1100 vlan 100 vlandev vr1
ifconfig vlan2100 vlan 100 vlandev vr2
ifconfig vlan3100 vlan 100 vlandev vr3
ifconfig bridge100 create
brconfig bridge100 add vlan1100
brconfig bridge100 add vlan2100
brconfig bridge100 add vlan3100
ifconfig bridge100 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
dhcpd bridge100

(Untested, probably missing some steps.)




# ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33160
priority: 0
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
dc0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:03:ba:13:3e:93
description: Uplink
priority: 0
groups: egress
media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
status: active
inet 66.63.12.66 netmask 0xffc0 broadcast 66.63.12.127
inet6 fe80::203:baff:fe13:3e93%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
dc1: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:03:ba:13:3e:94
description: LAN
priority: 0
media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
status: active
inet6 fe80::203:baff:fe13:3e94%dc1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
enc0: flags=0 mtu 1536
priority: 0
vlan1002: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 
1500

lladdr 00:03:ba:13:3e:94
priority: 0
vlan: 2 priority: 0 parent interface: dc1
groups: vlan
inet6 fe80::203:baff:fe13:3e94%vlan1002 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
vlan2: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:03:ba:13:3e:93
priority: 0
vlan: 2 priority: 0 parent interface: dc0
groups: vlan
inet6 fe80::203:baff:fe13:3e93%vlan2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
bridge1: flags=41UP,RUNNING mtu 1500
priority: 0
groups: bridge
bridge2: flags=41UP,RUNNING mtu 1500
priority: 0
groups: bridge
pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33160
priority: 0
groups: pflog
#



Re: 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

2009-04-17 Thread Jasper Valentijn
2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info:
 On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

 And also in Denhaag/Netherlands



Where did you order?


--
We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching
them to walk and talk and the next twelve telling them to sit down and
shut up.



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Daniel Ouellet

Daniel Ouellet wrote:

RJ45 wrote:

it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface

I think this problem has no solution...


See below, you still can have IP address to interface, use bridge and 
vlan as well. I do.


If that could possibly help you a little bit. Here is more details for 
you at the end of the email as in operation for many months now.


Hope this help anyway. And if you don't want to assign an ip address to 
a physical interface, you could always assign one to a loopback 
interface as well. I do that in some other setup.


Anyway, hope if gives you some example to work with and possibly solve 
your needs.


Best,

Daniel

PS: The full duplex is not needed if you have switch that works well in 
auto negotiation mode, witch all recent does, but I fix it on the switch 
as well as on the bridge here for other reason, so just don't go at it 
like that if you do not need it.


=
# ls hostname.*
hostname.dc0
hostname.dc1
hostname.vlan1002
hostname.vlan2

# ls bridgename.*
bridgename.bridge1
bridgename.bridge2

# cat hostname.*
inet 66.63.12.66 255.255.255.192 NONE  media 100baseTX mediaopt 
full-duplex description Uplink


up media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex description LAN

up vlan 2 vlandev dc1

up vlan 2 vlandev dc0

# cat bridgename.*
add dc0 add dc1 up

add vlan2 add vlan1002 up



Re: 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

2009-04-17 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 11:37, Fri 17 Apr 09, Jasper Valentijn wrote:
 2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info:
  On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
  4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
 
  And also in Denhaag/Netherlands
 
 

 Where did you order?

Pre-ordered from kd85 back in the days the order site was still linked
from the main openbsd website. (same day as pre-orders came available)

received my UPS tracking number yesterday and a box with loads of kd85
tape on it arrived this morning at 9:30



 --
 We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching
 them to walk and talk and the next twelve telling them to sit down and
 shut up.


--

Michiel van Baak
mich...@vanbaak.eu
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread RJ45

ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.

aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded 
to vr1 vr2 vr3


no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridge, and
after doing this everything is messed up

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Daniel Ouellet wrote:


Daniel Ouellet wrote:

RJ45 wrote:

it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface

I think this problem has no solution...


See below, you still can have IP address to interface, use bridge and vlan 
as well. I do.


If that could possibly help you a little bit. Here is more details for you at 
the end of the email as in operation for many months now.


Hope this help anyway. And if you don't want to assign an ip address to a 
physical interface, you could always assign one to a loopback interface as 
well. I do that in some other setup.


Anyway, hope if gives you some example to work with and possibly solve your 
needs.


Best,

Daniel

PS: The full duplex is not needed if you have switch that works well in auto 
negotiation mode, witch all recent does, but I fix it on the switch as well 
as on the bridge here for other reason, so just don't go at it like that if 
you do not need it.


=
# ls hostname.*
hostname.dc0
hostname.dc1
hostname.vlan1002
hostname.vlan2

# ls bridgename.*
bridgename.bridge1
bridgename.bridge2

# cat hostname.*
inet 66.63.12.66 255.255.255.192 NONE  media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex 
description Uplink


up media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex description LAN

up vlan 2 vlandev dc1

up vlan 2 vlandev dc0

# cat bridgename.*
add dc0 add dc1 up

add vlan2 add vlan1002 up




Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Daniel Ouellet

RJ45 wrote:

ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.


Your welcome.


aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded 
to vr1 vr2 vr3


I assume you wrote, that you want IP's on each interface.

My example show IP's on the physical interface dc0. If you want IP's on 
them, put them on. Or I guess it might be better to create lo1, lo2, lo3 
or what ever you want, put IP's on them and then make them part of the 
vlan you want them in. Nothing say you can't have multiple lox 
interfaces and use them as you want.


If you look at my example, the unlag vlan pass right through dc0 and dc1 
via the bridge1 and then an other set of IP's on vlan 2 pass between the 
same interface via bridge2.


So, what's really your problem here? Bridge all your interface on 
bridge10 of you want and add a lox interface to it if you want that too. 
Why not?



no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridge, and
after doing this everything is messed up


Start by doing two interface setup. Then add one more, etc. It does work.

And then plug your dhcp on the vlan/bridge you want after that.

I sent you a working setup, so start from there and move on. I even run 
pf on it too. That could be a little more tricky when you had more 
interface, but still a good play ground to be on. (;


Unless I really don't understand your question, witch I think I did 
understand it. There isn't any problem doing what you want to do at all.


Do, one step, test and do the next and you will get there.

Hope it help you anyway, but I think you have all that you need now.

Best,

Daniel



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Daniel Ouellet

RJ45 wrote:

ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.

aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded 
to vr1 vr2 vr3


no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridge, and
after doing this everything is messed up


Why not? I can add vlan only to bridge as well.

The only part I am not sure is the capability to add loopback to bridge. 
Obviously this would need to be tested. If I get some time today I might 
try to add a loopback interface to a bridge. I use plenty of loopback 
interface for various things and I assume you could put in into a 
bridge, but I can't say for sure.


But you sure can put them on the interface anyway, or vlan with an 
interface as the parent as I show you before and add it to the bridge.


If loopback can't be use that way then you can put IP on interface via 
different vlan, that for sure is possible and then add that vlan to your 
bridge.


See here, look at bridge2 is made of vlan only and bridge 1 is mad of 
physical interfaces:


# brconfig
bridge1: flags=41UP,RUNNING
priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 
proto rstp

dc1 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
port 2 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
dc0 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
port 1 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
Addresses (max cache: 100, timeout: 240):
00:03:ba:4e:6d:aa dc1 0 flags=0
00:03:ba:27:56:bf dc1 0 flags=0
00:03:ba:0a:36:0c dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:0f:e5:03 dc1 0 flags=0
00:18:73:53:7e:40 dc1 1 flags=0
00:10:e0:00:c7:08 dc1 0 flags=0
00:18:73:53:7e:58 dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:2b:41:96 dc1 0 flags=0
00:03:ba:68:4a:53 dc1 0 flags=0
00:03:ba:10:49:85 dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:0f:c3:87 dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:2a:8b:9c dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:0f:e4:35 dc1 1 flags=0
00:02:b3:40:db:a1 dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:0f:e4:2f dc1 0 flags=0
00:03:ba:4e:6d:fc dc1 1 flags=0
00:1f:5b:38:fc:30 dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:36:5a:9a dc1 0 flags=0
00:03:ba:0f:e4:61 dc1 1 flags=0
00:09:7c:d6:52:80 dc0 1 flags=0
00:0d:28:5e:a7:40 dc1 1 flags=0
00:03:ba:0f:e4:1f dc1 1 flags=0
bridge2: flags=41UP,RUNNING
priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 
proto rstp

vlan1002 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
port 5 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
vlan2 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
port 6 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
Addresses (max cache: 100, timeout: 240):
00:30:94:c4:32:72 vlan1002 0 flags=0
00:13:1a:59:1d:c4 vlan1002 1 flags=0
00:09:7c:d6:52:80 vlan2 1 flags=0
00:18:73:53:7e:58 vlan1002 1 flags=0
00:04:f2:02:06:10 vlan1002 1 flags=0
00:09:b7:0a:84:ff vlan1002 0 flags=0
00:07:eb:6a:a9:39 vlan1002 0 flags=0
#



Re: 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

2009-04-17 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:40:55 +0200
zpo peter.voi...@gmx.net wrote:

 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

arrived in Hannover/Germany

Thanks Wim, great job

regards

  Rafael 



Re: I need to mount in a normal account

2009-04-17 Thread Juan Jimenez Galdos
Hi. Right now i have written db   ALL=NOPASSWD:/sbin/mount /mnt/cd0,
/sbin/umount /mnt/cd0, but it seems that isn't correct. What could i write?
I was typing the root password, so i have tried the user password and it
works fine.

THank you very much.



Re: 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

2009-04-17 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

And also in Denhaag/Netherlands

-- 

Michiel van Baak
mich...@vanbaak.eu
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread RJ45

Thanks for all the hints.

I solved te problem in this way and everything works:

# configure vlan1 (Default) ip interface
ifconfig vr1 172.16.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig vr2 up
ifconfig vr3 up

# configure VLAN 100  (TAG 100) on physical interfaces use pseudo names
ifconfig vlan1100 vlan 100 vlandev vr1
ifconfig vlan2100 vlan 100 vlandev vr2
ifconfig vlan3100 vlan 100 vlandev vr3

# bridge pseudo vlans together with physical interfaces so that vlans
# is forwarded to all physical ports
ifconfig bridge100 create
ifconfig bridge100 add vlan1100 add vlan2100 add vlan3100 add vr1 add 
vr2 add vr3 up


# assign IP addres to vlan1100 (VLAN 100) ip interface
ifconfig vlan1100 inet 172.16.100.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 up

# configure VLAN 101  (TAG 101) on physical interfaces use pseudo names
ifconfig vlan1101 vlan 101 vlandev vr1
ifconfig vlan2101 vlan 101 vlandev vr2
ifconfig vlan3101 vlan 101 vlandev vr3

# bridge pseudo vlans together with physical interfaces so that vlans
# is forwarded to all physical ports
ifconfig bridge101 create
brconfig bridge101 add vlan1101 add vlan2101 add vlan3101 up

# assign IP address to vlan1101 (VLAN 101) ip interface
ifconfig vlan1101 inet 172.16.101.254 netmask 255.255.255.0


# start dhcp
/usr/local/sbin/dhcpd vlan1100 vlan1101

everything works, I can attach a wifi access point to whatever physical 
port vr1 vr2 or vr3, and vlans are forwarded to all ports



thank you


Rick


On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Daniel Ouellet wrote:


RJ45 wrote:

ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.

aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded to 
vr1 vr2 vr3


no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridge, and
after doing this everything is messed up


Why not? I can add vlan only to bridge as well.

The only part I am not sure is the capability to add loopback to bridge. 
Obviously this would need to be tested. If I get some time today I might try 
to add a loopback interface to a bridge. I use plenty of loopback interface 
for various things and I assume you could put in into a bridge, but I can't 
say for sure.


But you sure can put them on the interface anyway, or vlan with an interface 
as the parent as I show you before and add it to the bridge.


If loopback can't be use that way then you can put IP on interface via 
different vlan, that for sure is possible and then add that vlan to your 
bridge.


See here, look at bridge2 is made of vlan only and bridge 1 is mad of 
physical interfaces:


# brconfig
bridge1: flags=41UP,RUNNING
   priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp
   dc1 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
   port 2 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
   dc0 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
   port 1 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
   Addresses (max cache: 100, timeout: 240):
   00:03:ba:4e:6d:aa dc1 0 flags=0
   00:03:ba:27:56:bf dc1 0 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0a:36:0c dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0f:e5:03 dc1 0 flags=0
   00:18:73:53:7e:40 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:10:e0:00:c7:08 dc1 0 flags=0
   00:18:73:53:7e:58 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:2b:41:96 dc1 0 flags=0
   00:03:ba:68:4a:53 dc1 0 flags=0
   00:03:ba:10:49:85 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0f:c3:87 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:2a:8b:9c dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0f:e4:35 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:02:b3:40:db:a1 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0f:e4:2f dc1 0 flags=0
   00:03:ba:4e:6d:fc dc1 1 flags=0
   00:1f:5b:38:fc:30 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:36:5a:9a dc1 0 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0f:e4:61 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:09:7c:d6:52:80 dc0 1 flags=0
   00:0d:28:5e:a7:40 dc1 1 flags=0
   00:03:ba:0f:e4:1f dc1 1 flags=0
bridge2: flags=41UP,RUNNING
   priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp
   vlan1002 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
   port 5 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
   vlan2 flags=3LEARNING,DISCOVER
   port 6 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0
   Addresses (max cache: 100, timeout: 240):
   00:30:94:c4:32:72 vlan1002 0 flags=0
   00:13:1a:59:1d:c4 vlan1002 1 flags=0
   00:09:7c:d6:52:80 vlan2 1 flags=0
   00:18:73:53:7e:58 vlan1002 1 flags=0
   00:04:f2:02:06:10 vlan1002 1 flags=0
   00:09:b7:0a:84:ff vlan1002 0 flags=0
   00:07:eb:6a:a9:39 vlan1002 0 flags=0
#




Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Henning Brauer
* RJ45 r...@slacknet.com [2009-04-17 11:27]:
 it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
 address to a bridge interface

so just assign it to one of the bridge member interfaces. c'mon...

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Henning Brauer
* Markus Hennecke markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de [2009-04-17 09:54]:
 So you are saying that there is no relation in writing many times to one  
 inode and the block containing the inode no longer writeable? This seems  
 obvious to me because flash memory is involved. Perhaps you can give a  
 better explaination?

you're understanding is wrong. if the cell is kapot, a new one gets
mapped in, done.

 So what? Marco made a statement that he has seen no flash memory fail  
 because of writing to it. I have seen it fail once.

but you don't know wether writing was the cause at all.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Henning Brauer
* Markus Hennecke markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de [2009-04-17 08:06]:
 Marco Peereboom schrieb:
 I work with people that run io tools against flash parts.  I still have
 to see it fail too.  Your puny little firewall will never write more to
 it than a month long stress test.  This write fatigue argument is very
 silly.

 Generalization is always false.
 I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of OpenVPN  
 Connections from WLAN Clients which unfortunately had power saving  
 enabled and dropped the connection every few minutes. Took me around 2  
 or 3 weeks, I just forgot to reduce the log level. Perhaps those stress  
 tests are not stressing enough? That Card was a little bit older, but  
 seldom used, so there is a good chance that that scenario no longer 
 applies.

and I bet it didn't die because of the excessive writes but something
else. And until you show me proof that all reserve cells were mapped
in and in use I cannot be convinced of the opposite.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Henning Brauer
* RJ45 r...@slacknet.com [2009-04-17 14:08]:
 ifconfig bridge100 add vlan1100 add vlan2100 add vlan3100 add vr1 add  
 vr2 add vr3 up

congrats, now tehg speration between vlan100 and the 'native' vlan is gone.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: I can't download OpenBSD 4.5, 550 /pub/OpenBSD/4.5: Permission denied.

2009-04-17 Thread Juan Jimenez Galdos
Ok, thank you very much.



Re: generic.mp on laptop question: resolved

2009-04-17 Thread Neal Hogan
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Denny White denny...@cableone.net wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:41:27PM -0500, Denny White spoke thusly:
 Laptop is a Toshiba L305-S5921. I'm running -current on it with a snapshot
from 04/14/09. No, I couldn't wait for my new cd's
 presently in route. ;) Mostly done just for learning purposes 
 to see what I could get going on the new laptop which was given
 to me as a present. I would've probably chosen a Lenovo if I'd
 have had my choice, but I'm not going to turn down a free laptop.
 Built GENERIC.MP which ran fine for me. When I do

 sysctl hw.sensors

 I get

 hw.sensors.acpiac0.indicator0=On (power supply)
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt0=12.34 VDC (voltage)
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.volt1=12.34 VDC (current voltage)
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour0=4.50 Ah (last full capacity)
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour1=0.00 Ah (warning capacity)
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour2=0.00 Ah (low capacity)
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.amphour3=4.50 Ah (remaining capacity), OK
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw0=0 (battery full), OK
 hw.sensors.acpibat0.raw1=0 (rate)
 hw.sensors.cpu0.temp0=45.00 degC

 which doesn't show cpu1. Next is the top portion of top's output
 which does show both cpu's:

 load averages:  1.09,  1.02,  0.9901:03:49
 22 processes:  21 idle, 1 on processor
 CPU0 states:  3.7% user,  0.0% nice,  1.8% system,  0.3% interrupt, 94.2%
idle
 CPU1 states:  4.0% user,  0.0% nice,  1.8% system,  0.0% interrupt, 94.2%
idle
 Memory: Real: 7520K/349M act/tot  Free: 2538M  Swap: 0K/1028M used/tot


 Here's dmesg which also shows both cpu's but fails on
 acpitz0 at acpi0acpitz0: THRM: failed to read _TMP
 which I thought might have something to do with the issue:


 OpenBSD 4.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #1: Wed Apr 15 14:22:16 UTC 2009
 r...@lapdaddy.cableone.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
 cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T3400 @ 2.16GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 2.17 GHz
 cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUS
H,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
 real mem  = 3081773056 (2939MB)
 avail mem = 2983903232 (2845MB)
 mainbus0 at root
 bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 12/23/08, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe8120
(35 entries)
 bios0: vendor INSYDE version 1.60 date 12/23/2008
 bios0: TOSHIBA Satellite L305
 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP HPET APIC MCFG ASF! SLIC BOOT SSDT
 acpi0: wakeup devices LID0(S4) P32_(S0) UHC1(S3) UHC2(S3) ECHI(S3) EXP1(S0)
EXP2(S0) EXP3(S4) EXP4(S4) EXP5(S4) EXP6(S4) AZAL(S4)
 acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
 acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
 cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
 cpu0: apic clock running at 166MHz
 cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
 cpu1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T3400 @ 2.16GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 2.17 GHz
 cpu1:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUS
H,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
 ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 4
 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
 acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 4 (P32_)
 acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP1)
 acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 3 (EXP2)
 acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP3)
 acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP4)
 acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 6 (EXP5)
 acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP6)
 acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEGP)
 acpiec0 at acpi0
 acpicpu0 at acpi0
 acpicpu1 at acpi0
 acpitz0 at acpi0acpitz0: THRM: failed to read _TMP
 : failed to read _TMP
 acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
 acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID0
 acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online
 acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model PA3534U-1BRS serial 7C3B type Li-ion
 acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
 acpivideo at acpi0 not configured
 bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xfa00! 0xd/0x1000 0xd1000/0x2c00!
 cpu0: unknown Enhanced SpeedStep CPU, msr 0x060f0d2a06000d2a
 cpu0: using only highest and lowest power states
 cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2167 MHz (1372 mV): speeds: 2167, 1000 MHz
 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel GM45 Host rev 0x07
 vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel GM45 Video rev 0x07
 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 intagp0 at vga1
 agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xc000, size 0x1000
 inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 4 int 16 (irq 11)
 drm0 at inteldrm0
 Intel GM45 Video rev 0x07 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
 uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 4 int 16
(irq 11)
 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 4 int 21
(irq 10)
 ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x03: apic 4 int 19
(irq 11)
 ehci0: timed out waiting for BIOS
 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
 azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801I HD Audio rev 

Re: problem with multiport vlan with OpenBSD

2009-04-17 Thread Henning Brauer
* RJ45 r...@slacknet.com [2009-04-17 12:10]:
 ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.

 aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
 but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded  
 to vr1 vr2 vr3

 no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridge, and
 after doing this everything is messed up

oh geez. give up already, that's what you want apparently.
it is so darned simple.

bridge the physical interfaces - both untagged frames (native in
that totally awkward, stupid and wrong cizcoe speak) and tagged ones
will be bridged unconditionally.
exception for tagged packets: if there is a vlan interface with that tag,
then the vlan header is stripped and the frame delivered to that vlan
interface and not passed on to the bridge.
it is all so obvious...

bridge0: v1 vr2 vr3
bridge1: vlan1100 vlan2100 vlan3100

etc

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Shane J Pearson
2009/4/17 Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us

 I work with people that run io tools against flash parts.  I still have
 to see it fail too.  Your puny little firewall will never write more to
 it than a month long stress test.  This write fatigue argument is very
 silly.


Hey!  My firewall may be puny in stature (Net5501), but he is Puffy hearted
and on the Internet he is ten feet tall!



ipmi support on a Dell PowerEdge SC1425

2009-04-17 Thread Dave Wilson
... isn't working, at least not for me.

Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425

And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=112993650617151w=2

but under my amd64 install of 4.4 I get 'not configured'.

My current theory is that I've done something dumb.

Anyone care to tell me what it is?

Dave W



OpenBSD 4.4-stable (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jan 27 09:34:13 GMT 2009
r...@constantine:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 523399168 (499MB)
avail mem = 507768832 (484MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xfa850 (75 entries)
bios0: vendor Dell Computer Corporation version A03 date 01/04/2006
bios0: Dell Computer Corporation PowerEdge SC1425
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC SPCR HPET MCFG
acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) PALO(S5) PXH_(S5) PXHB(S5) PXHA(S5) PICH(S5)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (PALO)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (PXHB)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (PXHA)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (PICH)
acpicpu0 at acpi0
ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz, 3200.49 MHz
cpu0:
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR,NXE,LONG
cpu0: 2MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7520 Host rev 0x09
ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel E7520 PCIE rev 0x09
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
em0 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI) rev 0x05: irq
15, address 00:15:c5:5d:a0:ba
ppb2 at pci1 dev 0 function 2 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801EB/ER USB rev 0x02: irq 15
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801EB/ER USB rev 0x02: irq 14
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801EB/ER USB2 rev 0x02: irq 11
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xc2
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
em1 at pci4 dev 3 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI) rev 0x05: irq
6, address 00:15:c5:5d:a0:bb
vga1 at pci4 dev 13 function 0 ATI Radeon VE QY rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
drm at vga1 unsupported
pcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801EB/ER LPC rev 0x02
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801EB/ER IDE rev 0x02: DMA,
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
pciide0: channel 0 ignored (disabled)
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801EB SATA rev 0x02: DMA,
channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD800JD-75MSA3
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 76293MB, 15625 sectors
wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
spkr0 at pcppi0
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
uhidev0 at uhub2 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 CHICONY HP Basic
USB Keyboard rev 1.10/3.00 addr 2
uhidev0: iclass 3/1
ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 modifier keys, 6 key codes
wskbd1 at ukbd0 mux 1
wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Markus Hennecke

Henning Brauer wrote:

* Markus Hennecke markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de [2009-04-17 08:06]:

Marco Peereboom schrieb:

I work with people that run io tools against flash parts.  I still have
to see it fail too.  Your puny little firewall will never write more to
it than a month long stress test.  This write fatigue argument is very
silly.

Generalization is always false.
I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of OpenVPN  
Connections from WLAN Clients which unfortunately had power saving  
enabled and dropped the connection every few minutes. Took me around 2  
or 3 weeks, I just forgot to reduce the log level. Perhaps those stress  
tests are not stressing enough? That Card was a little bit older, but  
seldom used, so there is a good chance that that scenario no longer 
applies.


and I bet it didn't die because of the excessive writes but something
else. And until you show me proof that all reserve cells were mapped
in and in use I cannot be convinced of the opposite.


Tell me how I can show this. I got the card in a drawer around.

Kind regards,
  Markus



Re: generic.mp on laptop question: resolved

2009-04-17 Thread Denny White
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 06:45:48AM -0500, Neal Hogan spoke thusly:
 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Denny White denny...@cableone.net wrote:
 
ORIGINAL MESSAGE CONTENT SNIPPED FOR BREVITY
 
  Okay, dumb-ass me. Sitting here looking at the screen it finally
  dawned on me I'm not looking at 2 physical cpu's, per se, but
  instead 2 built onto one chip. Gee, I wish I would've come up
  with that beforehand instead of opening my mouth and removing
  any doubt in regards to my hardware ignorance. Only thing in
  my defense is I've never owned anything like that before. Before
  getting this laptop given to me, my fastest box was an aging dell
  dimension Pentium IV 2.66. No dual-cores, no dual-cpu's. Time to
  slink off now. ;)
 
 I'm sure there are other dumb-asses out there ( I just saw one in the
 mirror a minute ago) . . . your post will come in handy for those
 dumb-asses who actually check the archives.
 

There are other unintelligent life forms out there? Hallelujah, I'm
not alone anymore, and my cd's should arrive today. Life is good.
Thanks, Neal. ;)

Denny White

 
 -- 
 www.nealhogan.net  www.lambdaserver.com
 

-- 

===
() ASCII ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
===
GnuPG key  : 0x1644E79A  |  http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net
Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67  EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A
===



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Marco Peereboom
These people run io tools like iogen to it for a month at a time and
reuse the flash next time a device needs testing (the flash is just a
vessel).  If you want to see what iogen does run it on your laptop with
iogen -n5 and wait 1 minute.  Now try to cold launch firefox.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
 Marco Peereboom schrieb:
 I work with people that run io tools against flash parts.  I still have
 to see it fail too.  Your puny little firewall will never write more to
 it than a month long stress test.  This write fatigue argument is very
 silly.

 Generalization is always false.
 I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of OpenVPN  
 Connections from WLAN Clients which unfortunately had power saving  
 enabled and dropped the connection every few minutes. Took me around 2  
 or 3 weeks, I just forgot to reduce the log level. Perhaps those stress  
 tests are not stressing enough? That Card was a little bit older, but  
 seldom used, so there is a good chance that that scenario no longer 
 applies.

 Kind regards,
   Markus



Re: 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany

2009-04-17 Thread Jasper Valentijn
2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info:
 On 11:37, Fri 17 Apr 09, Jasper Valentijn wrote:
 2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.info:
  On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
  4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
 
  And also in Denhaag/Netherlands
 
 

 Where did you order?

 Pre-ordered from kd85 back in the days the order site was still linked
 from the main openbsd website. (same day as pre-orders came available)

Ahh ok. I did the same, only a day or so later.

 received my UPS tracking number yesterday and a box with loads of kd85
 tape on it arrived this morning at 9:30

Got my UPS tracking number minutes after my mail to misc@

 Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?


Both computers and drugs are mind expanding phenomena .



--
We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching
them to walk and talk and the next twelve telling them to sit down and
shut up.



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Henning Brauer
* Markus Hennecke markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de [2009-04-17 14:42]:
 Henning Brauer wrote:
 * Markus Hennecke markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de [2009-04-17 08:06]:
 Marco Peereboom schrieb:
 I work with people that run io tools against flash parts.  I still have
 to see it fail too.  Your puny little firewall will never write more to
 it than a month long stress test.  This write fatigue argument is very
 silly.
 Generalization is always false.
 I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of 
 OpenVPN  Connections from WLAN Clients which unfortunately had power 
 saving  enabled and dropped the connection every few minutes. Took me 
 around 2  or 3 weeks, I just forgot to reduce the log level. Perhaps 
 those stress  tests are not stressing enough? That Card was a little 
 bit older, but  seldom used, so there is a good chance that that 
 scenario no longer applies.

 and I bet it didn't die because of the excessive writes but something
 else. And until you show me proof that all reserve cells were mapped
 in and in use I cannot be convinced of the opposite.

 Tell me how I can show this. I got the card in a drawer around.

I dunno wether that info can be gotten from the device without knowing
internal details

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg  Amsterdam



Re: ipmi support on a Dell PowerEdge SC1425

2009-04-17 Thread Marco Peereboom
It is disabled by default because some boxes have issues with it.  Read
config(8) and enable it in your kernel.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:20:21PM +0100, Dave Wilson wrote:
 ... isn't working, at least not for me.
 
 Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:
 http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425
 
 And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support:
 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=112993650617151w=2
 
 but under my amd64 install of 4.4 I get 'not configured'.
 
 My current theory is that I've done something dumb.
 
 Anyone care to tell me what it is?
 
 Dave W
 
 
 
 OpenBSD 4.4-stable (GENERIC) #0: Tue Jan 27 09:34:13 GMT 2009
 r...@constantine:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
 real mem = 523399168 (499MB)
 avail mem = 507768832 (484MB)
 mainbus0 at root
 bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xfa850 (75 entries)
 bios0: vendor Dell Computer Corporation version A03 date 01/04/2006
 bios0: Dell Computer Corporation PowerEdge SC1425
 acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC SPCR HPET MCFG
 acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) PALO(S5) PXH_(S5) PXHB(S5) PXHA(S5) PICH(S5)
 acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
 acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (PALO)
 acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (PXHB)
 acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (PXHA)
 acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (PICH)
 acpicpu0 at acpi0
 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
 cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
 cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz, 3200.49 MHz
 cpu0:
 FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR,NXE,LONG
 cpu0: 2MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel E7520 Host rev 0x09
 ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel E7520 PCIE rev 0x09
 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
 ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09
 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
 em0 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI) rev 0x05: irq
 15, address 00:15:c5:5d:a0:ba
 ppb2 at pci1 dev 0 function 2 Intel PCIE-PCIE rev 0x09
 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
 uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801EB/ER USB rev 0x02: irq 15
 uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801EB/ER USB rev 0x02: irq 14
 ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801EB/ER USB2 rev 0x02: irq 11
 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
 ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xc2
 pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
 em1 at pci4 dev 3 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI) rev 0x05: irq
 6, address 00:15:c5:5d:a0:bb
 vga1 at pci4 dev 13 function 0 ATI Radeon VE QY rev 0x00
 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 drm at vga1 unsupported
 pcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801EB/ER LPC rev 0x02
 pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 82801EB/ER IDE rev 0x02: DMA,
 channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
 pciide0: channel 0 ignored (disabled)
 pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
 pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 82801EB SATA rev 0x02: DMA,
 channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
 pciide1: using irq 10 for native-PCI interrupt
 wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD800JD-75MSA3
 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 76293MB, 15625 sectors
 wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
 usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
 uhub1 at usb1 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
 usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
 uhub2 at usb2 Intel UHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
 isa0 at pcib0
 isadma0 at isa0
 com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
 pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
 wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker
 spkr0 at pcppi0
 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support
 uhidev0 at uhub2 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 CHICONY HP Basic
 USB Keyboard rev 1.10/3.00 addr 2
 uhidev0: iclass 3/1
 ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 modifier keys, 6 key codes
 wskbd1 at ukbd0 mux 1
 wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0
 softraid0 at root
 root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b



Re: ipmi support on a Dell PowerEdge SC1425

2009-04-17 Thread Remco
Dave Wilson wrote:

 ... isn't working, at least not for me.
 
 Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:

http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detailid=dsc1425
 
 And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support:
 http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=112993650617151w=2
 
 but under my amd64 install of 4.4 I get 'not configured'.
 
 My current theory is that I've done something dumb.
 
 Anyone care to tell me what it is?
 
 Dave W

It's not enabled by default. (not sure why)

To try it you need to enable ipmi in the kernel.
Either by using the config option (-c) at the boot prompt and typing 'enable
ipmi' to try it out at that particular boot (see boot(8), boot_config(8)),
or by using config(8) to enable it persistently at every boot.



Re: mismatch output net-snmp -current

2009-04-17 Thread uno83
Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote:
 
 i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow
 
 r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost
 .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.67.1 = INTEGER: 6
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.68.1 = INTEGER: 7
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.69.1 = INTEGER: 8
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.58.145.172.241 = INTEGER: 2
 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 4
 
 r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost
 .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3
 IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24)
 IF-MIB::ifType.2 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)
 IF-MIB::ifType.3 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)
 IF-MIB::ifType.4 = INTEGER: 244
 IF-MIB::ifType.5 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)
 IF-MIB::ifType.6 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)
 IF-MIB::ifType.7 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)
 IF-MIB::ifType.8 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6)
 IF-MIB::ifType.9 = INTEGER: 245
 
 interface index 5,6,7,8 have the right ip, but there's a mismatch at
 index 1, 2 and 4 of IP-MIB.
 
 any of you have the same problems ?
 
 regards,
 -Agung
 
 
 

Hi.

We are seeing the same problem.

This is what I get:
mon01:~# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public xxx .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2
IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: lo0
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: em0
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: em1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: em2
IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: em3
IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: enc0
IF-MIB::ifDescr.7 = STRING: bnx1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.8 = STRING: bnx0
mon01:~# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public xxx .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.147 = INTEGER: 1
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.162 = INTEGER: 2
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 6
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.168.54 = INTEGER: 3

It should be:
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.147 = INTEGER: 3
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.162 = INTEGER: 3
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.168.54 = INTEGER: 4

/Johan
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mismatch-output-net-snmp--current-tp22454362p23099146.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



4.5 arrived in Canada

2009-04-17 Thread Frank Bax
This year I was watching more closely for pre-order page to be updated 
and paid a few extra bucks for express shipping.


Same picture - two sizes:

0.5M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45s.jpg
5.0M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45.jpg

Frank



Re: 4.5 arrived in Canada

2009-04-17 Thread Jean-Francois
Absolutely *Splendid*

As of today for order to France what is the channel ?

Regards,

Jean-Frangois

Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 18:29:43, vous avez icrit :
 This year I was watching more closely for pre-order page to be updated
 and paid a few extra bucks for express shipping.

 Same picture - two sizes:

 0.5M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45s.jpg
 5.0M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45.jpg

 Frank



4.5 arrived in Poissy/France

2009-04-17 Thread freddy . dsx
4.5 (and t-shird) arrived in Poissy, France.

Thanks for this great work !



Re: 4.5 arrived in Canada

2009-04-17 Thread Francisco Valladolid Hdez.
http://openbsd.org/orders.html  there are find a respective seller from you 
country.

Regards.

--- 

---
ficovh - http://bsdguy.net
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Gen. 1:1


--- On Fri, 4/17/09, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: 4.5 arrived in Canada
 To: misc@openbsd.org
 Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 5:37 PM
 Absolutely *Splendid*
 
 As of today for order to France what is the channel ?
 
 Regards,
 
 Jean-Frangois
 
 Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 18:29:43, vous avez icrit :
  This year I was watching more closely for pre-order
 page to be updated
  and paid a few extra bucks for express shipping.
 
  Same picture - two sizes:
 
  0.5M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45s.jpg
  5.0M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45.jpg
 
  Frank



Re: 4.5 arrived in Canada

2009-04-17 Thread Etienne Robillard
cool, i'll look forward for getting a boxed copy...  :)
any ideas where to find one of those in montreal ?

Regards and congrats for the release!

- erob


On April 17, 2009 12:37:22 pm Jean-Francois wrote:
 Absolutely *Splendid*

 As of today for order to France what is the channel ?

 Regards,

 Jean-Frangois

 Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 18:29:43, vous avez icrit :
  This year I was watching more closely for pre-order page to be updated
  and paid a few extra bucks for express shipping.
 
  Same picture - two sizes:
 
  0.5M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45s.jpg
  5.0M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45.jpg
 
  Frank



Question about pfkey_reply (from bgpd/pfkey.c)

2009-04-17 Thread Matthew Dempsky
In the first few error cases where pfkey_reply returns early,
shouldn't the pending message still at least be read off the socket?
E.g., right now (as far as I can tell), if a pfkey response packet
ever has sadb_msg_errno set, that response will stay on the socket
forever and be used for every future pfkey_reply call.

Patch below is completely untested, and just meant to help explain the
potential problem.  I'm assuming that pfkey sockets behave like udp
sockets, and that reads without enough space still consume an entire
datagram.


Index: pfkey.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/pfkey.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -p -u -r1.34 pfkey.c
--- pfkey.c 26 Oct 2006 14:26:49 -  1.34
+++ pfkey.c 17 Apr 2009 20:11:38 -
@@ -417,9 +417,11 @@ pfkey_reply(int sd, u_int32_t *spip)

if (recv(sd, hdr, sizeof(hdr), MSG_PEEK) != sizeof(hdr)) {
log_warn(pfkey peek);
+   read(sd, hdr, sizeof(hdr)); /* discard packet */
return (-1);
}
if (hdr.sadb_msg_errno != 0) {
+   read(sd, hdr, sizeof(hdr)); /* discard packet */
errno = hdr.sadb_msg_errno;
if (errno == ESRCH)
return (0);
@@ -431,6 +433,7 @@ pfkey_reply(int sd, u_int32_t *spip)
len = hdr.sadb_msg_len * PFKEY2_CHUNK;
if ((data = malloc(len)) == NULL) {
log_warn(pfkey malloc);
+   read(sd, hdr, sizeof(hdr)); /* discard packet */
return (-1);
}
if (read(sd, data, len) != len) {



Re: 4.5 arrived in Canada

2009-04-17 Thread Martin Gignac
I'm in Montreal as well and just order them from the Computer Shop:

http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html#ca/cshop

-Martin



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread ropers
2009/4/16 Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com:
 I have a t5xxx also and want to do the same, but if I use usb flash (tried
 and worked fine), how to limit at max disk writes ? so the flash can live
 longer ...

 Please let me know if you find an answer to this question. I have all these
 openbsd machines booking off hard drives, and I'm trying to find a way to
 limit the writes, so my hard drives can live longer.

Mounting things like /tmp on large ramdisks and using generous
write-behind caching?

It may not make your machine any quicker, or save you any money, or
make things easier to administer, or decrease the risk of data loss;
in fact it may do the opposite; but then, you didn't ask about any of
these points...  :-P

It's probably always possible to somewhat improve a single metric if
you ignore the potentially catastrophic impact on everything else. ;-)



Re: Low power OpenBSD machine

2009-04-17 Thread Jason LaRiviere
I'm currently trying to get my hands on a Nexcom Nise 2000. Should come
in under your power specs. Our goals are slightly different - I want a
smaller, quieter home server, don't care to do anything desktop related
with it. I'm sure it would work fine for either.

Timothy Hume wrote:
 Hi,
 
 My current PC is not very healthy. I am considering building a new low
 power consumption machine. I want something a bit more powerful than a
 Soekris, but it doesn't have to be the fastest machine around. I will
 be using the machine for web browsing, Email, managing my digital
 photos and so on. The main requirement is that the machine is quiet
 and has a low power consumption so I can leave it on all the time.  I
 obviously want to build something which works perfectly with
 OpenBSD.
 
 Is it possible to build something like I describe which uses under 30
 Watts, and if so, what hardware would people recommend?
 
 Cheers,
 
 Tim.



HP 735/125 for donation in Adelaide, Australia

2009-04-17 Thread Graham Gower
This unit has been gathering dust for too long now and I figure
someone else may as well have a play with it. Its pretty heavy, maybe
25kg, so I'd prefer local pickup. I'd rather give it to a developer,
but if there is no interest I may change my mind.

No monitor or keyboard etc. It has two 50 pin SCSI drives (2gb, 1gb),
one of which is not well secured. The most recent dmesg I have from it
is below.

-Graham


[ using 325628 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ]
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
   The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2007 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.  http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC) #42: Thu Aug  9 22:28:09 CEST 2007
   kette...@faure.sibelius.xs4all.nl:/usr/src/sys/arch/hppa/compile/GENERIC
HP 9000/735/130 (Snake Cheetah) PA-RISC 1.1a
real mem = 184549376 (524288 reserved for PROM, 5885952 used by OpenBSD)
avail mem = 174346240
mainbus0 at root [flex fff8]
pdc0 at mainbus0
power0 at mainbus0: not available
mem0 at mainbus0 offset ffbf000: size 176MB
cpu0 at mainbus0 offset ffbe000 irq 31: PCXL L1-A 125MHz, FPU PCXT
(Rolex - CMOS-26B) rev 1
cpu0: 256K(32b/l) Icache, 256K(32b/l) wr-back Dcache, 120 coherent TLB, 16
BTLB
mongoose0 at mainbus0 offset c00 irq 17: HWPC000 rev 34, 33 MHz
eisa0 at mongoose0
isa at mongoose0 not configured
asp0 at mainbus0 offset 82f000 irq 28: Hardball rev 20, lan 1 scsi 7
gsc0 at asp0: wordleds
harmony0 at gsc0 offset 100 irq 13: rev 0
audio0 at harmony0
siop0 at gsc0 offset 83 irq 3 hpa=f083: NCR53C720 rev 2
scsibus0 at siop0: 16 targets
lpt0 at gsc0 offset 824000 irq 7
com1 at gsc0 offset 822000 irq 6: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com0 at gsc0 offset 823000 irq 5: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com0: console
hil0 at gsc0 offset 821000 irq 1
ie0 at gsc0 offset 826000 irq 8: i82596DX v0.0, address 08:00:09:1b:e8:fd
oosiop0 at gsc0 offset 825000 irq 9: NCR53C700 rev 0, 31MHz, SCSI ID 7
scsibus1 at oosiop0: 8 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: SEAGATE, ST32272N, 0876 SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd0: 2157MB, 6300 cyl, 4 head, 175 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 4419464 sec total
sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: SEAGATE, ST31200N, 8648 SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd1: 1006MB, 2700 cyl, 9 head, 84 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 2061108 sec total
sti0 at mainbus0 offset 800 irq 11: HPA1659A rev 8.02;10, ID
0x26D1482A40A00499
sti0: 2048x1024 frame buffer, 1280x1024x8 display, offset 768x0
sti0: 10x20 font type 1, 40 bpc, charset 0-255
biomask 0x7 netmask 0xf ttymask 0x3f
bootpath: 2/0/1.0 class=1 flags=c0autoboot,autosearch hpa=0xf0825000
spa=0x0 io=0x6abc
hil0: no devices
wsdisplay0 at sti0 mux 1
wsdisplay0: screen 0 added (std, vt100 emulation)
root on sd0a swap on sd0b dump on sd0b