Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-19 Thread Tim Judd
--- John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  The comp set isn't required to RUN OpenBSD.  Install the minimal
  (kernel, base, etc) and I think that will get the system running. 
 Then
  you can alter the booting mechanism (verbose) and make tweaks
 before
  loading comp.
 
 OK.  I have installed the bare sets to get it working.
 It is up and running now.  I rebooted and was able to access
 the UKC and requested verbose boot.  The verbose boot log
 is at the bottom of the message.
 
  I'm hitting Google with your pciide0 string and for the 2 minutes
 of
  searching, all I see are various people having problems.  Maybe
 because
  people won't complain or give this kind of information normally if
  things are working well.  I'll continue to search... could
 you/would
  you install the minimal and work from there?  Maybe it's corrupt on
 the
  source!  CD pressed/burned badly.  Older OpenBSD release working?
 
 I have not tried any other os installation.
 I have earlier versions which I could try, if
 we want to check that.  That would not be a
 problem.
 
 JohnM
 
 
 -
 dmesg w/verbose
snip!

OK, now I'm clueless why this happens.  I didn't see in your verbose
dmesg at all any obvious PCI busses or devices.  Yet the normal dmesg
lists your PCI devices.  I could be reading the devices wrong, but I
read in your verbose dmesg that it found:
1: Audio
2: Realtek Ethernet (probably a PCI device??)
3: isa0 bus
4: Keyboard/mouse ports (which I really think they are attached on the
ISA bus, internally on the motherboard)
5: speaker (again, same as #4, on the ISA bus in the motherboard)
6: parallel (ditto)
7: npx0 (I think this is your coprocessor, and I don't know what bus it
is on)
8: COM/Serial ports (ditto as #4)
9: Floppy drive (I would think this is on the ISA bus, but I am not
sure)

Aside from #2, the realtek ethernet, I am not seeing any signs of PCI
detection.  But how can it boot off the drive, which is on pciide0
(from original, normal dmesg in digest #783).  That device sure looks
like it's on the PCI bus.  I'm lost on this one, I totally expected to
see anything, SOMETHING about the pci bus (wouldn't it be pci0?).

John did state he has another version, and if *THIS* thing fails
horribly bad on trying to get more information, I would try the other
version.  I'm not sure if the 4.1-RELEASE (at least the sparc32 one)
was done correctly, I have a simple 64MB sparcstation5 that after I
came home from work one day, the box was at the 4th prompt (for ya i386
folks, that's similar to the BIOS/SETUP program).  A day or two later
the same box, same config, same everything was waiting on a ddb prompt
with what seemed to be a runaway application (smbd, ddb's ps command
just kept endlessly returning smbd as processes running on the box). 
The only change to this box was an addon SBUS 4-port ethernet board. 
Anyway, I got sidetracked in the basic statement that there may be
something wrong with the comp41.tgz set?  bad press?  bad release
process on OpenBSD?  I can't pin it down, but I didn't have *ANY*
problem with 4.0, in any of it's platforms.

The above paragraph may start flaming, and I want to defuse it right
now.  The problem I have above may not at all be related to John's
original problem, but I've also seen other people having trouble
installing 4.1 on this mailing list and wonder if it has something
related/linked that we can use.  Heck, my 4.1 i386 CD I burned locks up
my keyboard/kvm so bad that I have to push the buttons on the front to
reboot.  It gets to the install, upgrade, shell and then locks up.

John, please try 4.0 and then doing a source upgrade to 4.1, if this
verbose dmesg doesn't help anybody.  Sorry for bringing it up :(

Good luck.

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.



Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-19 Thread Tim Judd
--- John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  OK, now I'm clueless why this happens.  I didn't see in your
 verbose
  dmesg at all any obvious PCI busses or devices.  Yet the normal
 dmesg
  lists your PCI devices.  I could be reading the devices wrong, but
 I
  read in your verbose dmesg that it found:
  1: Audio
  2: Realtek Ethernet (probably a PCI device??)
  3: isa0 bus
  4: Keyboard/mouse ports (which I really think they are attached on
 the
  ISA bus, internally on the motherboard)
  5: speaker (again, same as #4, on the ISA bus in the motherboard)
  6: parallel (ditto)
  7: npx0 (I think this is your coprocessor, and I don't know what
 bus it
  is on)
  8: COM/Serial ports (ditto as #4)
  9: Floppy drive (I would think this is on the ISA bus, but I am not
  sure)
  
  Aside from #2, the realtek ethernet, I am not seeing any signs of
 PCI
  detection.  But how can it boot off the drive, which is on pciide0
  (from original, normal dmesg in digest #783).  That device sure
 looks
  like it's on the PCI bus.  I'm lost on this one, I totally expected
 to
  see anything, SOMETHING about the pci bus (wouldn't it be pci0?).
 
 I have no idea why that is happening.  Strange.
 
  John did state he has another version, and if *THIS* thing fails
  horribly bad on trying to get more information, I would try the
 other
  version.  ...
  
  John, please try 4.0 and then doing a source upgrade to 4.1, if
 this
  verbose dmesg doesn't help anybody.  Sorry for bringing it up :(
 
 This is the 4.0 release.  I usually run a release behind.  And, I
 have
 not ordered a 4.1 yet.  I will in the next week or two.
 
 I do have v3.9 and earlier releases available.

Whatever you have onhand that you know has worked in the past.  3.9
isn't supported anymore, but using 3.9 to update to 4.0 or 4.1 would
probably work as documented by the fabulous documentation!

Let us know!

 JohnM
 
 -- 
 john mendenhall
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 surf utopia
 internet services
 


If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.


 

Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
in the Yahoo! Answers Food  Drink QA.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545367



Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-16 Thread Tim Judd
--- John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:30:44AM -0700, John Mendenhall wrote:
   If anyone knows of a tool I can use to determine the ATA
   controller, or any other hw things I need to find out,
   please post any pointers.
  
  dmesg(8)
 
 Well, I posted the dmesg at the beginning of this thread.
 Here is an excerpt with the ide/ata hardware:
 
 -
 pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x06: ATA100,
 channel
 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
 wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: IC35L120AVV207-0
 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 117800MB, 241254720 sectors
 wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
 wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: WDC WD1200JB-00DUA3
 wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 114473MB, 234441648 sectors
 -
 
 There may be more.
 Please let me know if I need to repost it.
 
   Anyone know how to boot with more messages?
   man boot doesn't show any verbose options.
  
  Use UKC (boot -c), and the verbose command.  See boot_config(8).
 
 Is this supported when booting from cd?  I can only boot from the
 cd right now.  Once it starts copying data, it crashes in the comp
 set.

The comp set isn't required to RUN OpenBSD.  Install the minimal
(kernel, base, etc) and I think that will get the system running.  Then
you can alter the booting mechanism (verbose) and make tweaks before
loading comp.

I'm hitting Google with your pciide0 string and for the 2 minutes of
searching, all I see are various people having problems.  Maybe because
people won't complain or give this kind of information normally if
things are working well.  I'll continue to search... could you/would
you install the minimal and work from there?  Maybe it's corrupt on the
source!  CD pressed/burned badly.  Older OpenBSD release working?

couple of things to try...  i'll look when I get a second or two.

 JohnM
 
 -- 
 john mendenhall
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 surf utopia
 internet services
 


If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.


   
Luggage?
 GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mailp=graduation+giftscs=bz



Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-15 Thread Tim Judd
I (still) receive the digest, copied message without quoting characters

- QUOTE:
We have done a low level disk format using an ultimate
boot cd.  Didn't output any errors.  Did this on both
drives in the system.  Took a very long time.

Then, tried to install the OS.  Received a panic on
installing the comp set, ffs_valloc dup alloc.
Reconfigured to have all install go to one drive.
Same error, different inode.  Tried all on other drive,
same error, different inode.  Kept trying it over and
over.  Always panicked on comp set.  Always same error
of ffs_valloc dup alloc.  Always a different inode.

I am unable to copy in the actual error.  I just have
this on a monitor in the room.  No console capability.

Same dmesg as before in this thread.  I can post again
if needed.

My question is, to debug this, or fix it, do I need
to start swapping out cables, hard disks, motherboard,
etc?  Any hints or suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks in advance!

JohnM
 /QUOTE


John, since you were able to boot the ultimate boot cd and run both
drives completely, I don't think any hardware is the culprit.  Your CD
drive, Hard Drive(s), memory, etc all work under that OS.

My mindset is now leading to some bug that OpenBSD is doing (probably)
with the ATA controller.  Probe from the ultimate boot cd to see what
ATA controller it is using, and then find what OpenBSD is finding the
ATA controller to be.  A minor model difference could be the culprit
(model 1234 versus model 1234a, for example).

Bug may not be the right word, but it's what's coming to mind.  Not to
steer away from OpenBSD, but if the three big BSDs all have trouble, we
might be able to limit what might be the problem.  FreeBSD operating
system runs on a live CD either with their disc1 (install disk, look
for the fixit option and then select CD/DVD)  start running things
like dd and etc to run data on the drive.  Nothing valuable there now
anyway, is there?  Maybe using a *rand device under /dev

NetBSD doesn't have (AFAIK) a live-cd, but i'm pretty sure you can
escape to shell from their installer.  Run similar/same tools.  get
dmesg from both Free and Net while you're on it.  save it to external
medium (usb stick, floppy).  Compare the findings to OpenBSD's dmesg.

Basically, it boils down to the fact that one OS ran for several hours
with CONSTANT hdd activity with no errors.  I think it's a software
problem, including drivers into the software category.

Thanks!

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.


   

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play 
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/  



Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-15 Thread Tim Judd
Linux OS'en (IIRC) use lspci like what pciconf is for FreeBSD.

I don't know if Open would have any of those tools built in.  I don't
have a ready openbsd box right now.

Google search for thunderboot ultimate boot cd doesn't reveal
anything.  it suggested a spelling correction, for thunderboom, which
didn't easily reveal any bootable cd.  A link to the ISO and I'd offer
what I can for diagnostics and probing solutions.

Is there a way to get the kernel to more verbosely announce what it's
probing and configuring, like what FreeBSD's boot loader's -v option
will do?  Haven't tried, haven't looked anything up.

We are definately narrowing down the culprit, and I just hope we come
to a solid conclusion.

--- John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Tim,
 
  John, since you were able to boot the ultimate boot cd and run both
  drives completely, I don't think any hardware is the culprit.  Your
 CD
  drive, Hard Drive(s), memory, etc all work under that OS.
  
  My mindset is now leading to some bug that OpenBSD is doing
 (probably)
  with the ATA controller.  Probe from the ultimate boot cd to see
 what
  ATA controller it is using, and then find what OpenBSD is finding
 the
  ATA controller to be.  A minor model difference could be the
 culprit
  (model 1234 versus model 1234a, for example).
 
 I am using the thunderboot ultimate boot cd.
 Any hints on which tool could get the ata controller the box is
 using?
 I can see the ATA-# supported (6,5,4,3,2).  Lots of other
 information.
 I don't see a model/version number yet.
 
 I will keep checking all the tools on here.
 
 JohnM
 
 -- 
 john mendenhall
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 surf utopia
 internet services
 


If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.


   
You
 snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html



Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-08 Thread Tim Judd
I subscribe to the digest, so I've copied the message and excluded the
quoting characters ()

- Quote --
Received:from a.mx.surfutopia.net (a.mx.surfutopia.net
[69.63.196.98]) by shear.ucar.edu (8.14.1/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
l47HTpuJ013519 for misc@openbsd.org; Mon, 7 May 2007 11:29:52 -0600
(MDT)
Received:   by a.mx.surfutopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id
5B2B9F23B; Mon, 7 May 2007 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date:   Mon, 7 May 2007 10:29:50 -0700
From:   John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Subject:Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version:   1.0
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Archive-Number:   200705/407
X-Sequence-Number:  49945


Artur,

 Have you done forced fsck of the partitions? This sounds like a
 problem with the data you have on disk. It would be even nicer if you
 could update to a newer fsck because it has been updated to deal with
 many new strange corner cases we've been seeing. Although, that might
 or might not require a fully -current system, I'm not fully aware of
 everything that has been going in fsck, but some of the ffs2 support
 might have messed things up.
 
 We've seen one of those panics recently on an important OpenBSD
 infrastructure machine and that led to a lot of fsck work (since
 fsck didn't catch the particular problem). But on production
 machines we deal with filesystem corruption by simply dumping the
 filesystem and restoring it from scratch. You might want to try
 that as well.

We have done a forced fsck on the partition with the
error.  The problem is, there is no data other than
the openbsd install.  All I was trying to do was load
the source from the openbsd cd into /usr/src.

I don't need to restore since this is a new machine.
I have not done anything to it.

I'll just reinstall the entire thing.  Unless someone
wants me to try something else.

Thanks!

JohnM

-- 
john mendenhall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
surf utopia
internet services

--- /QUOTE

John,
I've heard, and seen, a lot of odd problems that can't be duplicated
with the same error when there's either of the following true.

1) overclocked hardware
2) bad system memory

I'm doubting your system memory, but I'm curious about your
overclocking.

I don't think I've followed very carefully what you've already tried,
and wonder if the mindset has ever drifted away from Hard Drives and
ATA controllers.

Another thread suggested catting /dev/ad0s1 /dev/null and seeing how
many errors you get.  If you get errors, it might point to what can't
be read (and maybe can't be written then).  You might have to use
another tool, but you should get the jist of what I'm trying to
suggest.

Good luck.

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash

2007-05-08 Thread Tim Judd
Replies interspersed.

--- John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Tim,
 
 On Tue, 08 May 2007, Tim Judd wrote:
 
  - Quote --
  Date:   Mon, 7 May 2007 10:29:50 -0700
  From:   John Mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  CC: misc@openbsd.org
  Subject:Re: new openbsd 4.0 server, panic on ufsdirhash
  
  Artur,
  
  We have done a forced fsck on the partition with the
  error.  The problem is, there is no data other than
  the openbsd install.  All I was trying to do was load
  the source from the openbsd cd into /usr/src.
  
  I don't need to restore since this is a new machine.
  I have not done anything to it.
  
  I'll just reinstall the entire thing.  Unless someone
  wants me to try something else.
  
  Thanks!
  
  JohnM
  --- /QUOTE
  
  John,
  I've heard, and seen, a lot of odd problems that can't be
 duplicated
  with the same error when there's either of the following true.
  
  1) overclocked hardware
  2) bad system memory
  
  I'm doubting your system memory, but I'm curious about your
  overclocking.
  
  I don't think I've followed very carefully what you've already
 tried,
  and wonder if the mindset has ever drifted away from Hard Drives
 and
  ATA controllers.
  
  Another thread suggested catting /dev/ad0s1 /dev/null and seeing
 how
  many errors you get.  If you get errors, it might point to what
 can't
  be read (and maybe can't be written then).  You might have to use
  another tool, but you should get the jist of what I'm trying to
  suggest.
 
 All hardware is as received, no overclocking is being done.
 
 The system memory was the first issue we had.  I have set
 the bios such that the system memory gives no errors on very
 long memtest runs.
 
 Currently, we are running a low level format of the two disks.
 No errors yet, but will run another day or so.
 
 Then, we'll reinstall the os and see how it goes.
 
 Why would I want to cat /dev/ad0s1?
 Or, are you referring to the actual drive, which is /dev/wd0?

I'm sorry, I switch between FreeBSD and OpenBSD so often, I don't catch
myself often enough stating the right device name.  This is the OpenBSD
mailing list and I should have thought.  I did mean OpenBSD's drive
name, which would be wd0.

'cat'ting the drive is simply reading data from the surface and sending
it to the bitbucket, so we can see if we can read the surface of the
drive without errors.

A low-level format is an interesting twist, and I would like to see if
that helps.  I've witnessed myself a drive with bad blocks dissapear
after a high-level format.  It was the oddest of things, the FS itself
was corrupted and a disk check didn't help the situation.  Maybe it was
a glitch, I don't know.  I put that drive back into rotation.


  Good luck.
 
 Thanks!

You're welcome!

 JohnM
 
 -- 
 john mendenhall
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 surf utopia
 internet services
 

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.


 

Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather



New Samba 3.0x on OpenBSD 4.x

2007-05-04 Thread Tim Judd
Hello list,

I'm subscribed to the digest, so I don't reply unless I see a posting
in the next day.  I would reply to privmsgs though.

I'm trying to setup a OpenBSD box to provide user logins domain
membership with samba 3.0.24-main (via packages).  I configure it like
I have configured samba in the past, but something is new, different.

When I try to obtain the current mapping of NTGROUPS to UNIXGROUPS via
net groupmap list -- all I get is my prompt back, not even a blank
line.  It's as if there are no groups defined.  But shouldn't a group
be defined for example, Domain Admins, or Users, etc?  Maybe not mapped
right, but defined..  I'm not able to find anything via google with the
search terms I'm trying.  And I would appreciate any help.

CC me for a quicker response. :)  thanks.

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Re: Dynamic DNS (first setup, couple troubles)

2007-04-14 Thread Tim Judd
--- Tim Judd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks for ANY help from all of you excellent people out there.  Of
 you
 want a configuration file, they are available at:
 http://usemy.homeunix.org:88/dhcpd.txt
 http://usemy.homeunix.org:88/named.txt

I was seeing if anybody was checking my problem out by viewing the
access log on my server, and I found named.txt to be getting error 403
-- which I should have fixed by now.  If you still want to address this
and want to look at my files, please try again.

thank you all!

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Dynamic DNS (first setup, couple troubles)

2007-04-13 Thread Tim Judd
Hi everyone -- I'm hoping that someone here can clue me in.

With a couple of websites' help, I got ddns working to create records,
but nothing I do seems to be able to remove those entries.  They are
inserted under the name that the host had when it inserted the record,
and never updates.  The single PC that is booting OpenBSD/i386 isn't
getting it's new name into ddns.

References:
#1:
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:4Y72kR1rdNMJ:www.bsdguides.org/guides/openbsd/networking/dynamic_dns_dhcp.php+openbsd+ddnshl=enct=clnkcd=1gl=usclient=firefox-a
(The original page on bsdguides just gives me a blank page, so I used
Google's cached version.  This howto was written with OpenBSD 3.6)

Network topology:
OpenBSD/sparc 4.0-RELEASE (will download and apply patches this
weekend, it's a new installation) is the DHCP/BIND ddns machine.  It's
serving a network of 192.168.1/24 with two DHCP reservations.
Windows workstation is one of the reservations, and my FreeBSD box is
the other (.11 and .10 respectively).
The test box as mentioned above is OpenBSD/i386.

First problem:
The two machines with DHCP Reservations yield this error when being
booted.
- Quote -
Apr 13 20:23:46 usemy dhcpd: Dynamic and static leases present for
192.168.1.11.
Apr 13 20:23:46 usemy dhcpd: Remove host declaration FATMAN or remove
192.168.1.11
Apr 13 20:23:46 usemy dhcpd: from the dynamic address pool for
192.168.1/24
- /Quote -

And the host declarations are simple, like this:
- Quote -
  host FATMAN {
hardware ethernet 00:02:B3:XX:XX:XX;
fixed-address 192.168.1.11;
  }
- /Quote -

What should I do to eliminate the error above?  clear the dhcpd.leases
file?

Second Problem:
Once a host has been established (as mentioned above), it's entry isn't
updated, in the 30-60 minutes of playing with this that I've done so
far.  How can I force this update?  Or for the matter, force a removal
of said entry?




As a side note: the Bind ARM mentions something about using rndc as the
tool to control the nameserver (freezing a zone if you need to edit the
zonefile for example).  Can someone give me confirmation that's how you
do it?  What I read didn't make much sense, but I may have been looking
in the wrong place!  :( :(

Thanks for ANY help from all of you excellent people out there.  Of you
want a configuration file, they are available at:
http://usemy.homeunix.org:88/dhcpd.txt
http://usemy.homeunix.org:88/named.txt

If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
I can is a way of life.
More and Bigger is not always Better.
The road to success is always uphill.
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com