Google ad: OpenBSD 2.6 changes

2005-12-15 Thread Alexander Farber
Just smth funny FYI:

I read misc@ mails using GMail thorugh a web browser
and I've noticed that it displays on the right side an ad

OpenBSD 2.7 changes
the main OpenBSD page
www.openbsd.org

or even 2.6 changes :-)

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/pageclick?client=ca-gmailtype=0channel=AccountAge120toInfinity%2BContentOneboxCVredir_url=http://www.openbsd.org/plus27.html



Re: Nokia IP330 OpenBSD 3.8 Information and Installation Assistance

2005-12-15 Thread NetNeanderthal
Here is the world's first (that I know of) Nokia IP330 dmesg from
OpenBSD 3.8.  Some parts are missing as I've been hacking on the
kernel, boot, and biosboot all night so a real 'fix' will follow this
message after I clean it up a bit and figure out exactly which of the
nasty hacks I used made it proceed.

---8---
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #2: Thu Dec 15 02:54:43 GMT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (AuthenticAMD 586-class) 399 MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,PGE,MMX
real mem  = 268017664 (261736K)
avail mem = 240664576 (235024K)
using 3297 buffers containing 13504512 bytes (13188K) of memory
mainbus0 (root)
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+(6e) BIOS, date 10/27/99, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfaa20
pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xae9c
pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfd3c0/144 (7 entries)
pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 10 11 12
pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 (Intel 82371SB ISA rev 0x00)
pcibios0: PCI bus #1 is the last bus
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82439TX System rev 0x01
pcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA rev 0x02
pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 Intel 82371AB IDE rev 0x01: DMA,
channel 0 wired to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: WDC WD200EB-11CPF0
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 19092MB, 39102336 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 disabled (no drives)
Intel 82371AB USB rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 not configured
Intel 82371AB Power rev 0x02 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 not configured
fxp0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 Intel 82557 rev 0x05, i82558: irq 10,
address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 0
fxp1 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 Intel 82557 rev 0x05, i82558: irq 12,
address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inphy1 at fxp1 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 0
fxp2 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 Intel 82557 rev 0x05, i82558: irq 5,
address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inphy2 at fxp2 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 Intel S21154AE/BE PCI-PCI rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
dc0 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 DEC 21142/3 rev 0x41: irq 10, address
00:c0:95:c7:cd:88
dcphy0 at dc0 phy 31: internal PHY
dc1 at pci1 dev 6 function 0 DEC 21142/3 rev 0x41: irq 12, address
00:c0:95:c7:cd:89
dcphy1 at dc1 phy 31: internal PHY
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
spkr0 at pcppi0
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom0: console
pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
biomask ebc5 netmask ffe5 ttymask ffe7
pctr: user-level cycle counter enabled
mtrr: K6-family MTRR support (2 registers)
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
---8---



Re: Nokia IP330 OpenBSD 3.8 Information and Installation Assistance - SOLVED

2005-12-15 Thread NetNeanderthal
Ok, here's my quick and dirty hack to get OpenBSD operating on a Nokia
IP330.  Please bear in mind that this is not a fully correct solution,
only a hard-coded workaround for legacy hardware.

- relocate the Nokia hard drive into a surrogate machine
- Install OpenBSD 3.8, be sure to include comp.tgz and misc.tgz.  Reboot.
- retrieve kernel sources and extract into /usr/src/sys
- modify /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/libsa/bioscons.c in the
following manner: (force n = 2 instead of incorrectly discerning 0
from the com_probe (a small piece of assembly code could probably be
debugged to make this work properly, but it is beyond the scope of
this workaround '__asm __volatile(DOINT(0x11) : =a (n) : : %ecx,
%edx, cc);'))

---8---
105,106c105
 n = 9;
 n = 7;
---
   n = 2; /* We know there are two com ports -- force it */
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#InstBoot)
- Set your console to com0 in /etc/boot.conf and tty00 in /etc/ttys
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq7.html#SerCon)
- Remove the drive from the surrogate machine and reinstall into the IP330

I'll post a more thorough installation/caveat write-up on these
devices soon enough, but for now the masses of you that eMailed me
privately have a hack to get your OpenBSD fix on legacy Nokia
hardware.

Good luck.



Re: Daily script and root backup question.

2005-12-15 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:20:19PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
 What problem are you trying to solve?

It's my curiosity and urge for understanding.

  What procedure is more safety? dd'ing device and then run fsck on
  output device, or runing after dump/restore installboot?
 
 There are multiple ways to do most tasks.  One has to be picked.
 
 restore(8) requires that a partition be mounted. (...) 

Thanks!

-- 
best regards
q#



Re: hostap mode on existing firewall

2005-12-15 Thread Niall O'Higgins
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:20:06PM -0500, Chris Zakelj wrote:
 Here's the problem I've run into... after staring at the dhcpd.conf man
 page for a while, it didn't seem like you could feed it two interfaces
 at once.  So off to Google, where the top articles (for Linux,
 admittedly) seem to confirm that you can't serve both the wired and the
 wireless internal interfaces at the same time.  

Of course dhcpd can handle multiple interfaces. I don't know how you
could have gotten the idea that it couldn't. If you read even the
on-line synopsis of the manual page or looked at dhcpd's usage you
would see this is clearly supported. 

Note the [...ifN]:

dhcpd [-dfn] [-c config-file] [-l lease-file] [if0 [...ifN]]

 I consider the possibility of putting ral0 into a bridge with fxp1, and
 thought this might work...
 
 /etc/hostname.fxp1:
 inet 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
 
 /etc/hostname.ral0:
 inet 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 media autoselect mediaopt hostap nwid
 this_is_only_a_test nwkey totally_sucks chan 11
 #I've also tried 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 with the same results
 
 /etc/bridgename.bridge0:
 add fxp1
 add ral0
 up
 
 /etc/dhcpd.interfaces
 fxp1 ral0 bridge0 #not sure whether ral0 or bridge0 is what dhcpd listens to
 
 and finally at the end of /etc/pf.conf
 pass quick on { fxp1, ral0, bridge0 }
 
 Needless to say, I'm getting no love there, either.  Is what I'm trying
 to do simply not possible, or is there something (obvious, perhaps) that
 I'm missing.  Yeah, I could go down the street and just buy a WAP, but
 that defeats the purpose of learning.



Re: hostap mode on existing firewall

2005-12-15 Thread Remco
Chris Zakelj wrote:

 Here's the problem I've run into... after staring at the dhcpd.conf man
 page for a while, it didn't seem like you could feed it two interfaces
 at once.  So off to Google, where the top articles (for Linux,
 admittedly) seem to confirm that you can't serve both the wired and the
 wireless internal interfaces at the same time.  


Hoping I understand you correctly, won't something like this work ?

Put the interfaces you want to run dhcpd on in /etc/dhcpd.interfaces.

/etc/dhcpd.conf:

shared-network LOCAL-NET {
option  domain-name my.domain;
option  domain-name-servers 192.168.10.1;

subnet 192.168.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 192.168.10.1;

range 192.168.10.32 192.168.10.127;
}
}

shared-network WLAN {
option  domain-name wlan.my.domain;
option  domain-name-servers 192.168.20.1;

subnet 192.168.20.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 192.168.20.1;

range 192.168.20.32 192.168.20.127;
}
}

// end of /etc/dhcpd.conf

LOCAL-NET serves the wired interface configured as 192.168.10.1
WLAN serves the wireless interface configured as 192.168.20.1

Your /var/log/daemon may show dhcpd messages telling you for which interface
you're missing subnet definitions.

I think the trick is to have subnet definitions that correspond to the ip
addresses of the interfaces you want to run dhcpd on.



Re: hostap mode on existing firewall

2005-12-15 Thread Chris Zakelj
Niall O'Higgins wrote:

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:20:06PM -0500, Chris Zakelj wrote:
  

Here's the problem I've run into... after staring at the dhcpd.conf man
page for a while, it didn't seem like you could feed it two interfaces
at once.  So off to Google, where the top articles (for Linux,
admittedly) seem to confirm that you can't serve both the wired and the
wireless internal interfaces at the same time.  


Of course dhcpd can handle multiple interfaces. I don't know how you
could have gotten the idea that it couldn't. If you read even the
on-line synopsis of the manual page or looked at dhcpd's usage you
would see this is clearly supported. 

Note the [...ifN]:

dhcpd [-dfn] [-c config-file] [-l lease-file] [if0 [...ifN]]
  

Should have been able to get that myself, but for some reason it just
went right by me (just like the '#ed0 le0' line in the default
dhcpd.interfaces file did).  Time to stop trusting Google implicitly.

I consider the possibility of putting ral0 into a bridge with fxp1, and
thought this might work...

/etc/hostname.fxp1:
inet 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 NONE

/etc/hostname.ral0:
inet 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 media autoselect mediaopt hostap nwid
this_is_only_a_test nwkey totally_sucks chan 11
#I've also tried 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 with the same results

/etc/bridgename.bridge0:
add fxp1
add ral0
up

/etc/dhcpd.interfaces
fxp1 ral0 bridge0 #not sure whether ral0 or bridge0 is what dhcpd listens to

and finally at the end of /etc/pf.conf
pass quick on { fxp1, ral0, bridge0 }

Needless to say, I'm getting no love there, either.  Is what I'm trying
to do simply not possible, or is there something (obvious, perhaps) that
I'm missing.  Yeah, I could go down the street and just buy a WAP, but
that defeats the purpose of learning.


I've gotten a couple of offlist replies which suggest I'm at least on
the right track with this part, but making three mistakes (one in
hostname.ral0, one in pf, and one in dhcpd.interfaces).  I'll be able to
try what I think are 'fixes' later this evening.



Halifax Bank Account Information

2005-12-15 Thread Halifax Bank
 [IMAGE] Dear Customer, Our Technical Service department has recently
updated our online bankingsoftware, and due to this upgrade we kindly ask
you to follow thelink given below to confirm your online account details.
Failure toconfirm the online banking details will suspend you from
accessing youraccount online.

https://www.halifax-online.co.uk/_mem_bin/formslogin.asp

We use the latest security measures to ensure that your online bankingexperience
is safe and secure. The administration asks you to accept ourapologies
for the inconvience caused and expresses gratitude forcooperation.
Regards, Halifax Online Technical Support -- Please do not reply to this
email address as it is not monitored and wewill be unable to respond.For
assistance, log in to your Halifax Online Bank account and choosethe
Help link on any page. ) Halifax plc, Registered in England No.
2367076. Registered Office:Trinity Road, Halifax, West Yorkshire HX1 2RG.
Authorised and regulatedby the Financial Services Authority. Represents
only the HalifaxFinancial Services Marketing Group for the purposes of
advising on andselling life assurance



Re: browser security - restricted user

2005-12-15 Thread Lukasz Sztachanski
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:48:28AM -0800, Bob Smith wrote:
  Just a thought: sudo -u $some_restricted_user $your_preffered_browser  ?
 
 good that you brought this up; i been wondering about this too.
 
 does it help? if so how come there isnt a default non-privileged user
 created for, say, firefox when the pkg is installed? like there is for
 bitlbee (_bitlbee) or tcpdump (_tcpdump)?
 
... yeah, and create separate user for every 3-rd party package, that
had security holes in the past ;) 

Why people are so afraid of systrace, especially as creating policy for
non-fork()`ing and non-set*id()`ing application is considerably safer
for its usability?



- Lukasz Sztachanski


-- 
0x058B7133 // 16AB 4EBC 29DA D92D 8DBE  BC01 FC91 9EF7 058B 7133
http://szati.blogspot.com
http://szati.entropy.pl



Re: Flame bait - recommendations for web devlopment language?

2005-12-15 Thread Bryan Allen

On Dec 15, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Dag Richards wrote:

Php is what I am comfortable doing what I used to do with PERL CGI.
So what are the recommended languages for developing ...
buzz Interactive Data Driven Websites /buzz.


http://catalyst.perl.org/
--
Bryan Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bda.mirrorshades.net
Cyberpunk is dead. Long live cyberpunk.



Re: Flame bait - recommendations for web devlopment language?

2005-12-15 Thread Darrin Chandler

Dag Richards wrote:


I have a php app that I inherited, and moved to an OBSD server.
I can make it run but only by -u -ing it.  It makes a bunch of
really risky calls to shell utils ( cp, rm, openssl for example).

So I will rewrite the app so it will run in a properly chrooted web 
server, not shell out, and use a database not the file system

to store data.

I have read on the list over the last couple of months, that php is 
deprecated for website development, and that java development is 
problematic on OBSD. I assume that CGI's with calls to OS binaries 
would not be recommended ...


Php is what I am comfortable doing what I used to do with PERL CGI.
So what are the recommended languages for developing ...
buzz Interactive Data Driven Websites /buzz.

Hoping not to be savaged too badly by the list.


I'm not sure you're going to get many flames about this...

If you try really hard, you can clean up the php. Mostly.

Then there's Python or Ruby on Rails. Better stuff than php. You still 
have to code securely. Rails just had a new release with emphasis on 
cleanup and bug fixes as opposed to adding tons of new features (usually 
a good sign).


--
Darrin Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stilyagin.com/



Re: Flame bait - recommendations for web devlopment language?

2005-12-15 Thread Brandon Mercer

Darrin Chandler wrote:
snip


I'm not sure you're going to get many flames about this...

If you try really hard, you can clean up the php. Mostly.

Then there's Python or Ruby on Rails. Better stuff than php. You still 
have to code securely. Rails just had a new release with emphasis on 
cleanup and bug fixes as opposed to adding tons of new features 
(usually a good sign).


I'll agree with the Ruby on Rails suggestion... probably one of the best 
web development tools I've ever seen.  And it works great on OpenBSD.  :-)

Brandon



Universal Ethernet Telecommunications Service (UETS)

2005-12-15 Thread J Herrero
Hi to all,

I want to share with you a project under way called UETS that was idea of one 
of my networking teachers here in Spain, Jose Morales, an engineer that 
participates in the LAN  MAN commitees of IEEE 802.3.

It's quite revolutionary and perhaps Theo and the rest of the experts may see 
aspects in which OpenBSD could implement this developing standard. 

You can see all the papers (some in english) in this url: 
http://www.lmdata.es/uets.htm. I think it will be interesting to some of you.

Here are some comments about the papers by Jose Morales himself:


Following are a commented relation of the papers I've published with the 
description of UETS, in order to make easier for  you to understand the system. 
Its main characteristic is its extreme simplicity, being based on standards 
already existing and proved.



From Computer Networks to the Computer on Net 
(http://www.lmdata.es/uets/uets-gcn.pdf) published in the  IEEE Communications 
Magazine / Global Communications Newsletter, pp. 2-4, October 2005 
(http://www.comsoc.org/pubs/gcn/gcn1005.html). This paper describes the basic 
Architecture of the UETS system, which offers an HDLC interface over a 
physical switching network. It is well known the HDLC congestion and flow 
control capability, but to do that it needs to operate over physical circuits 
(circuit switching, co-cs) or physical packet switching, like the described in 
this paper. In summary, this paper is fundamental to understand the next one. 
This paper (they call it Ethernet Everywhere, 
http://www.internetmark2.org/study/resources.html) also serve as a reference 
to the Internet Mark 2 Project (http://www.internetmark2.org), one of whose 
objectives is to advise the United Nations and the International 
Telecommunications Union for the development of Internet. 

A technical paper: A new Communications Architecture and Switching Paradigm 
(http://www.lmdata.es/uets/uets-cm1.pdf), describes the switching architecture 
that uses Ethernet for delivering the various services. It is a manuscript 
submitted to IEEE CommMag, which is the first of two parts. The second part:  A 
new Paradigm for Ethernet Telecommunications Services and its Transport in NG 
SDH/SONET, in preparation, addresses the admission control and QoS based in the 
LLC protocol control capabilities, which provides four types of service: CBR 
flows, rt-VBR, nrt-VBR and Best Effort. It describes also the transport of the 
different services over Next Generation SDH/SONET using a new GFP mechanism, 
combination of GFP-F and GFP-T. To understand the fundamentals of the control 
mechanisms, you have to see the Figure 2 of the paper From Computer Networks 
to the Computer on Net: the interface of the network can use the LLC or 
TCP/IP protocol stacks.


* The LLC-1 protocol provides the real time interface, that can be associated 
with:

- NG SDH/SONET circuits for CBR flows (for example E1 emulation)
- GFP to rt-VBR (for example Video on Demand)

* The LLC-2 protocol provides nrt-VBR, an only operates over GFP.

* The TCP/IP stack using ETYPE provides the Best Effort services.

* There are also the LLC-3 protocol, that can be used in multiprocessor systems 
or specific types of HDX traffic.


In UETS, the coupling with topology is with the switching addressing, that 
shouldn't be related with the network addressing. In the communications nodes, 
there is always needed an internal physical addresses to perform the routing of 
the packets, cells or frames. Those are mapped with the external addresses by 
means of the switching tables. In this way, you will consider the CUE's network 
like only one machine, in which the physical addresses are the local MAC. It is 
similar to the Fibre Channel's operation, but based in IEEE standards. The 
network addresses are related with the machine (local MAC) outside the 
network, following the Internet model: do you use the IP addresses in Internet? 
It can be done in multiple ways. Whit this solution, and using the HDLC 
control, it is possible to have a real time services with characteristics of 
circuit switching: minimum delay and bandwidth guaranteed.


The system described from the services point of view, in the paper published in 
the Spanish engineering Magazine Anales de Mecanica y Electricidad, pp. 48-54, 
January 2005. The English version is available on-line: Universal Ethernet 
Telecommunications Service (http://www.lmdata.es/uets-eng.pdf). After read the 
other papers, it looks like the system is oriented only to Telecoms Networks. 
In fact, it can be used also in multiprocessor systems, corporate networks and 
others described in this article. My proposal is not only for public services, 
remember that it is Universal, it can be used to build multiprocessor systems 
replacing Fibre Channel, the premier technique for storage area networking 
(SAN), with Ethernet/LLC. I have teach various courses in SAN and Fibre 
Channel, and my proposal shares the same philosophy an 

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

2005-12-15 Thread Lukasz Sztachanski
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0100, viq wrote:
 Well, I'm trying to go the other way - from using KMail to finally make 
 myself 
 configure mutt ;)
 
or try mutt-ng [1]. It's patched version of mutt, that supports nntp,
sidebar and other usefull extensions. 


- Lukasz Sztachanski

[1] afair, http://mutt-ng.berlios.de
-- 
0x058B7133 // 16AB 4EBC 29DA D92D 8DBE  BC01 FC91 9EF7 058B 7133
http://szati.blogspot.com
http://szati.entropy.pl



dd performance

2005-12-15 Thread chefren

Wiping identical 18GB SCSI disks on same Dell 1750 machine:


OpenBSD 3.8:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd0c bs=1024k

6MB/s


Linux 2.4:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1024k

53MB/S



Any clue about the difference? Of course I'm also interested in 
different ways to do this but the difference is what puzzles me.


+++chefren



Re: dd performance

2005-12-15 Thread Jason Crawford
I think the very first thing you should change is use the raw device
in OpenBSD (/dev/rsd0c) and that should speed things up a bit.

Jason

On 12/15/05, chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wiping identical 18GB SCSI disks on same Dell 1750 machine:


 OpenBSD 3.8:

 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd0c bs=1024k

 6MB/s


 Linux 2.4:

 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1024k

 53MB/S



 Any clue about the difference? Of course I'm also interested in
 different ways to do this but the difference is what puzzles me.

 +++chefren



login.conf - chpass - _mysql

2005-12-15 Thread Uwe Dippel
Just another curiosity:
The archive is full of suggestions to combat the dreaded MySQL Error No.9
with a specific login class (and others); usually suggested to be 'mysql'
in login.conf.

Now, for reasons of pure logic and beauty, I call it _mysql.
Then - if my logic is correct - I need to define this class for the user
_mysql. 'chpass' is a way. Alas, it won't accept neither _mysql nor mysql
as class and mumbles something about a typo.
This I don't understand, because from the creation of login.conf onwards,
_mysql is shown as possible login class with adduser. Would this be a bug
in chpass ? Using vipw permits this change, though.

Second: In my understanding, rc runs as daemon; so will there be any
effect to starting mysql in rc.local through this class ? Will rc not
automatically and irrevocably start mysql with the parameters of daemon
(login class) ?
The only way I could imagine this class to ever take effect would be when
starting mysql as root with sudo on an already running box.

All this could be badly wrong, though. Please correct me if it is !
Only, if it is: Is this (_)mysql login class not rather useless ? Should
we then not rather put _mysql into daemon; in order to have exactly the
same parameters starting from rc (at boot) and anytime later ?

My excuses if this is completely wrong; and any correction welcome !

Uwe



Re: dd performance

2005-12-15 Thread ober

They have a superior /dev/zero
:D

-Ober

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, chefren wrote:


Wiping identical 18GB SCSI disks on same Dell 1750 machine:


OpenBSD 3.8:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd0c bs=1024k

6MB/s


Linux 2.4:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=1024k

53MB/S



Any clue about the difference? Of course I'm also interested in different 
ways to do this but the difference is what puzzles me.


+++chefren




Re: Flame bait - recommendations for web devlopment language?

2005-12-15 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:08:00AM -0800, Dag Richards wrote:
 I have a php app that I inherited, and moved to an OBSD server.
 I can make it run but only by -u -ing it.  It makes a bunch of
 really risky calls to shell utils ( cp, rm, openssl for example).
 
 So I will rewrite the app so it will run in a properly chrooted web 
 server, not shell out, and use a database not the file system
 to store data.
 
 
 I have read on the list over the last couple of months, that php is 
 deprecated for website development, and that java development is 
 problematic on OBSD. I assume that CGI's with calls to OS binaries would 
 not be recommended ...
 
 Php is what I am comfortable doing what I used to do with PERL CGI.
 So what are the recommended languages for developing ...
 buzz Interactive Data Driven Websites /buzz.
 
 Hoping not to be savaged too badly by the list.

Why would you be savaged? It's a sensible question, it hasn't been
discussed to death. Of course, you did forget to post a dmesg, but I
think this can be forgiven in this particular case... ;-)

Rewriting sounds good. If it means scrapping everything and starting
from scratch. Don't use too much old code - it will likely be as buggy
and insecure as the portions that are most obviously broken.

I dislike PHP (it's far too easy to do really stupid stuff, plus the
language itself is full of holes), and am pretty much in the position
you are in right now. I've not decided yet, but feel good about perl -
it's far more common than ruby or python. Either of which are good
languages, BTW, but learning a new language is time-consuming, and
especially working with lots of people, using a language that is
reasonably easy to write [1] and reasonably well-known is a plus.

(It also looks like there's no mod_python in the source tree; I don't
know why, but I never really used python so that's not surprising, but
it might be an argument against python. There is a mod_perl, mod_ruby,
and it might be supported via another port - but I don't see it in
python. And the mod_*s are quite a bit faster than CGIs.)

As an off-the-wall remark, FastCGI looks really nice, too. I'll try it
sometime soon.

Joachim

[1] Being easy to read would be a plus, too...



Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

2005-12-15 Thread Jack Woehr

Bryan Irvine wrote:


On 12/14/05, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 


Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one
exists) other than Mozilla?
   


Want to stay in gui-ville?  I recommend evolution.
 


Thanks to everyone for the lively discussion and many recommendations.
I'm playing with sylpheed (Thanks, Bill!) right now and in the meantime
fetchmailing and sanitizing manually before feeding mail files to 
Mozilla ...


--
Jack J. Woehr # I never played fast and loose with the
PO Box 51, Golden, CO 80402   # Constitution. Never did and never will.
http://www.well.com/~jax  # - Harry S Truman



Re: login.conf - chpass - _mysql

2005-12-15 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Uwe Dippel wrote:

 Just another curiosity:
 The archive is full of suggestions to combat the dreaded MySQL Error No.9
 with a specific login class (and others); usually suggested to be 'mysql'
 in login.conf.
 
 Now, for reasons of pure logic and beauty, I call it _mysql.
 Then - if my logic is correct - I need to define this class for the user
 _mysql. 'chpass' is a way. Alas, it won't accept neither _mysql nor mysql
 as class and mumbles something about a typo.

Please report exact command lines and error messages.

 This I don't understand, because from the creation of login.conf onwards,
 _mysql is shown as possible login class with adduser. Would this be a bug
 in chpass ? Using vipw permits this change, though.
 
 Second: In my understanding, rc runs as daemon; so will there be any
 effect to starting mysql in rc.local through this class ? Will rc not
 automatically and irrevocably start mysql with the parameters of daemon
 (login class) ?
 The only way I could imagine this class to ever take effect would be when
 starting mysql as root with sudo on an already running box.
 
 All this could be badly wrong, though. Please correct me if it is !
 Only, if it is: Is this (_)mysql login class not rather useless ? Should
 we then not rather put _mysql into daemon; in order to have exactly the
 same parameters starting from rc (at boot) and anytime later ?

Use su(1) to start the command with a given login class.

-Otto



hme0 error

2005-12-15 Thread Cody Holland
I'm running a Sun Netra T1 105 server with OpenBSD 3.8.  Everything
works great, but I'm getting this error: hme0: status=400MAXPKT.  I've
searched Google and found several links talking about the same thing.
It looks like the ethernet interface received a packet that is too
large.  My question is, is this something I should look at or just
simply ignore?  I've included the dmesg just incase.
console is /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],3803f8
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California.  All rights
reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2005 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #607: Sat Sep 10 16:03:59 MDT 2005
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/GENERIC
total memory = 335544320
avail memory = 295354368
using 2048 buffers containing 16777216 bytes of memory
bootpath: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0
mainbus0 (root): Netra t1 (UltraSPARC-IIi 360MHz)
cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi @ 360.015 MHz, version 0 FPU
cpu0: physical 32K instruction (32 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 1024K
external (64 b/l)
psycho0 at mainbus0 addr 0xfffc
SUNW,sabre: impl 0, version 0: ign 7c0 bus range 0 to 3; PCI bus 0
DVMA map: c000 to e000
IOTDB: 1896000 to 1916000
pci0 at psycho0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 Sun Simba PCI-PCI rev 0x13
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ebus0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 Sun PCIO Ebus2 rev 0x01
auxio0 at ebus0 addr 726000-726003, 728000-728003, 72a000-72a003,
72c000-72c003, 72f000-72f003
power at ebus0 addr 724000-724003 ipl 37 not configured
SUNW,pll at ebus0 addr 504000-504002 not configured
com0 at ebus0 addr 3803f8-3803ff ipl 28: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com0: console
com1 at ebus0 addr 3602f8-3602ff ipl 20: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
lpt0 at ebus0 addr 340278-340287, 30015c-30015d, 70-7f ipl 34:
polled
fdthree at ebus0 addr 3203f0-3203f7, 706000-70600f, 72-720003 ipl 39
not configured
clock1 at ebus0 addr 0-1fff: mk48t59: hostid 80c2a980
flashprom at ebus0 addr 0-f not configured
watchdog at ebus0 addr 20-20003f ipl 4 not configured
display7seg at ebus0 addr 200040-200040 not configured
beeper0 at ebus0 addr 722000-722003: can't map register space
flashprom at ebus0 addr 40-5f not configured
flashprom at ebus0 addr 80-9f not configured
i2c at ebus0 addr 60-63 ipl 40 not configured
i2c at ebus0 addr 10-13 ipl 27 not configured
SUNW,lom at ebus0 addr 40-400063 not configured
hme0 at pci1 dev 1 function 1 Sun HME rev 0x01: address
08:00:20:c2:a9:80
luphy0 at hme0 phy 0: LU6612 10/100 PHY, rev. 1
hme0: using ivec 3021 for interrupt
siop0 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 Symbios Logic 53c875 rev 0x03: ivec
1820, using 4K of on-board RAM
scsibus0 at siop0: 16 targets
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: IBM-PSG, DNES-309170Y !#, SAHR SCSI3
0/direct fixed
sd0: 8678MB, 11474 cyl, 5 head, 309 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 17774160 sec
total
sd1 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: COMPAQ, BD009122C6, B016 SCSI2 0/direct
fixed
sd1: 8678MB, 5273 cyl, 20 head, 168 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 17773524 sec
total
ppb1 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Sun Simba PCI-PCI rev 0x13
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
ppb2 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 DEC 21150 PCI-PCI rev 0x04
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
pciide0 at pci3 dev 14 function 0 CMD Technology PCI0646 rev 0x03:
DMA, channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to
native-PCI
pciide0: using ivec 1802 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives)
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus1 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: TOSHIBA, CD-ROM XM-7002Bc, 1110 SCSI0
5/cdrom removable
cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
pcons at mainbus0 not configured
No counter-timer -- using %tick at 360MHz as system clock.
root on sd0a
siop0: target 0 now using tagged 16 bit 20.0 MHz 16 REQ/ACK offset xfers
rootdev=0x700 rrootdev=0x1100 rawdev=0x1102
hme0: status=400MAXPKT
syncing disks... 
console is /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],3803f8
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California.  All rights
reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2005 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #607: Sat Sep 10 16:03:59 MDT 2005
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/GENERIC
total memory = 335544320
avail memory = 295354368
using 2048 buffers containing 16777216 bytes of memory
bootpath: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],0
mainbus0 (root): Netra t1 (UltraSPARC-IIi 360MHz)
cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi @ 360.015 MHz, version 0 FPU
cpu0: physical 32K instruction (32 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 1024K
external (64 b/l)
psycho0 at mainbus0 addr 0xfffc
SUNW,sabre: impl 0, version 0: ign 7c0 bus range 0 to 3; PCI bus 0
DVMA map: c000 to e000
IOTDB: 1896000 to 1916000
pci0 at psycho0

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

2005-12-15 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:58:42PM +0100, Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0100, viq wrote:
  Well, I'm trying to go the other way - from using KMail to finally make 
  myself 
  configure mutt ;)
  
 or try mutt-ng [1]. It's patched version of mutt, that supports nntp,
 sidebar and other usefull extensions. 
 
 
   - Lukasz Sztachanski
 
 [1] afair, http://mutt-ng.berlios.de

Mutt-ng is currently rewritten from scratch, so it's probably not a
good idea to use it right now [1]. 

The OpenBSD port of mutt saves you much trouble and does include most
of the important patches (sidebar, hcache - sidebar is maybe not in
-stable, but certainly in -current).

So if you don't need any special patches that are mutt-ng specific, try
the mutt/snapshot port :)

Tobias

[1] http://mutt-ng.supersized.org/ (Development wiki)



OpenNTPD problem

2005-12-15 Thread Jakob Fix
Hello, I'm running the latest portable OpenNTPD on a Debian box, but it's just
not keeping time.  When I first start it, just executing ntpd, it sets the time
correctly, but then starts diverging, after a couple of weeks, like this (this
machine is currently one hour and a half ahead):

sh-3.00$ sudo tail /var/log/daemon.log
[...]
Dec 15 21:55:57 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6431.804472s
Dec 15 21:55:57 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 21:58:45 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 200.218.160.160 now valid
Dec 15 21:59:09 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6432.906307s
Dec 15 21:59:09 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 21:59:19 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 80.74.132.178 now valid
Dec 15 21:59:38 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 202.173.190.30 now valid
Dec 15 22:03:11 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 216.194.70.2 now valid
Dec 15 22:04:00 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6433.975776s
Dec 15 22:04:00 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 22:04:13 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 62.112.194.60 now invalid
Dec 15 22:08:10 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6435.087634s
Dec 15 22:08:10 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 22:11:38 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6436.039326s
Dec 15 22:11:38 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 22:14:20 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6437.093983s
Dec 15 22:14:20 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 22:15:11 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 62.112.194.60 now valid
Dec 15 22:16:10 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 62.52.109.76 now invalid
Dec 15 22:17:19 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6437.998041s
Dec 15 22:17:19 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 22:21:32 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjusting local clock by -6438.912244s
Dec 15 22:21:32 localhost ntpd[24843]: adjtime failed: Invalid argument
Dec 15 22:22:57 localhost ntpd[24844]: peer 216.194.70.2 now invalid
[...]

I seem to have understood that at a certain point, when the time difference is
too big, the adjtime call can no longer be used, but how does it get to this
point in the first place?

I would really like to have this solved as I am running mythtv on this machine,
and with a timekeeper like this I'll never be able to record the one programme
I'd actually like to watch :-).

Thanks in advance,
Jakob.



Re: OpenNTPD does not 'pull-in' wrong time

2005-12-15 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:32:13 +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:

 By my rough calculations, your system clock is drifting at about 1.6%,
 which is more than adjtime can correct for (roughly 0.5%).

All fine, and no flame intended:
There have been people bragging about openntpd to be advantageous compared
to standard ntpd (in the ports) for 'pilling in' any offset. ntpd
simply doesn't start when it is off by more than a certain amount.
If openntpd can correct around 0.5%, how many days / weeks would it take
then to pull in a very wrong clock !?
I wonder if the refusal of ntpd to start does not make some sense at least
?
With all respect to openntpd: Isn't it a false 'warm feeling' to have
it running, when it can't possibly never ever pull in a drift of 1.6 %
- but rather drifts apart ever further ? Or has to catch in a badly
offset clock of 8 hours (e.g.) and runs off sync for ages before
reaching correct time ?
In short: should it not have a control built-in warning the user
(syslog at least) that it will never catch up or only within days ?
(and suggests or does run rdate) ?

It would have at least saved me early on in this case.

Uwe



Re: Mambo Server hacks

2005-12-15 Thread chefren

On 11/26/05 11:58, Bruno S. Delbono wrote:


Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?


If you are interested in a KISS approach take a look at TinyMCE, an easy to 
configure JavaScript WYSIWYG(!!!) editor:


http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/example_full.php?example=true

(Instantly drop at least all character formatting features other than Styles 
and check the input for malicious code... )


Design the site with CSS, use the SQL database you like, glue it together with 
whatever scripting language you have experience with and make it as secure as 
you need it.


+++chefren



Re: dd performance

2005-12-15 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hello!

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:20:13AM -0500, Jason Crawford wrote:
I think the very first thing you should change is use the raw device
in OpenBSD (/dev/rsd0c) and that should speed things up a bit.

You're right. And high enough block size (though 1024k should be okay).
I.e. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd0c bs=1024k

chefren, how's the measurement on OpenBSD 3.8 with this change?

Jason

Kind regards,

Hannah.



BGPD Boot-Time Startup Problem

2005-12-15 Thread unixgeek
When I try and startup OpenBGP at boot time I get the following error
message:

Dec 15 18:15:45 www bgpd[31059]: neighbor 2001:4830:e2:25::1 (AS30071):
session_connect bind: Can't assign requested address

When trying to perr with the OCCAID network (www.occaid.net), running IPV6
however when I start the process up manually (after the computer is
booted):
/usr/sbin/bgpd -f /etc/bgpd.conf

The process connexts and runs just fine:


 BGP neighbor is 2001:4830:e2:25::1, remote AS 30071
 Description: AS30071
  BGP version 4, remote router-id 65.126.230.2
  BGP state = Established, up for 00:12:28
  Last read 00:00:29, holdtime 180s, keepalive interval 60s
  Neighbor capabilities:
Multiprotocol extensions: IPv6 Unicast
Route Refresh

  Message statistics:
  Sent   Received
  Opens1  1
  Notifications0  0
  Updates  0741
  Keepalives  13 14
  Route Refresh0  0
  Total   14756

  Local host:2001:4830:e2:25::2, Local port:   9611
  Remote host:   2001:4830:e2:25::1, Remote port:   179


Is there some type of a problem in synchroniziation at boot time wih
remote AS's? Maybe sometime of a delay is needed under certain
circunstances...

Thanks!
Glenn



Re: BGPD Boot-Time Startup Problem

2005-12-15 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:34:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I try and startup OpenBGP at boot time I get the following error
 message:
 
 Dec 15 18:15:45 www bgpd[31059]: neighbor 2001:4830:e2:25::1 (AS30071):
 session_connect bind: Can't assign requested address
 

You force a local address bgpd has to bind to via the local-address config
option. It seems that on bootup the requested address is not yet
available. It looks like your IPv6 settup is done after bgpd is started.

How do you configure the IPv6 network?

 Is there some type of a problem in synchroniziation at boot time wih
 remote AS's? Maybe sometime of a delay is needed under certain
 circunstances...
 

It mostly depends on when your local address gets available.

-- 
:wq Claudio



Re: BGPD Boot-Time Startup Problem

2005-12-15 Thread unixgeek
The ipv6 newtwork is setup in rc.local:

#Setup ipv6 routing:
echo -n 'Setting Up IPv6 to OCCAID Network'
ifconfig gif0 giftunnel 68.21.68.114 69.72.192.238
ifconfig gif0 inet6 2001:4830:e2:25::2
route add -inet6 2001:4830:e2:25::1 -prefixlen 64 2001:4830:e2:25::2
route add -inet6 default 2001:4830:e2:25::1

 It could well be that on boot-up this is address is not avaiable yet..and
I might need to put in a delay (say startup with cron perhaps)...
Thanks;
Glenn

 On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:34:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I try and startup OpenBGP at boot time I get the following error
 message:

 Dec 15 18:15:45 www bgpd[31059]: neighbor 2001:4830:e2:25::1 (AS30071):
 session_connect bind: Can't assign requested address


 You force a local address bgpd has to bind to via the local-address config
 option. It seems that on bootup the requested address is not yet
 available. It looks like your IPv6 settup is done after bgpd is started.

 How do you configure the IPv6 network?

 Is there some type of a problem in synchroniziation at boot time wih
 remote AS's? Maybe sometime of a delay is needed under certain
 circunstances...


 It mostly depends on when your local address gets available.

 --
 :wq Claudio



Re: OpenNTPD does not 'pull-in' wrong time

2005-12-15 Thread Ted Unangst
On 12/15/05, Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:32:13 +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:

  By my rough calculations, your system clock is drifting at about 1.6%,
  which is more than adjtime can correct for (roughly 0.5%).

 All fine, and no flame intended:
 There have been people bragging about openntpd to be advantageous compared
 to standard ntpd (in the ports) for 'pilling in' any offset. ntpd
 simply doesn't start when it is off by more than a certain amount.
 If openntpd can correct around 0.5%, how many days / weeks would it take
 then to pull in a very wrong clock !?
 I wonder if the refusal of ntpd to start does not make some sense at least
 ?
 With all respect to openntpd: Isn't it a false 'warm feeling' to have
 it running, when it can't possibly never ever pull in a drift of 1.6 %
 - but rather drifts apart ever further ? Or has to catch in a badly
 offset clock of 8 hours (e.g.) and runs off sync for ages before
 reaching correct time ?
 In short: should it not have a control built-in warning the user
 (syslog at least) that it will never catch up or only within days ?
 (and suggests or does run rdate) ?

start it with -s.



Re: login.conf - chpass - _mysql

2005-12-15 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:07:52 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:

 Please report exact command lines and error messages.

chpass _mysql
[change daemon into mysql or _mysql]; :wq
chpass: illegal character in the class field
re-edit the password file? [y]:

 Use su(1) to start the command with a given login class.

like
# su -c _mysql _mysql -c date
This account is currently not available.
?

Hey, I don't want to offend anyone in here !
I only found some 20 occurrences of that additional login class and the
same number of this suggestion. While typing, I asked myself, how the
environment will be picked up, ever. And started to think ... and started
to have doubts.
I bet 90% of those people who report success with mysql with this class do
not have it due to this login class, but due to the values of the daemon
class. With which their mysql runs, incidentially.

# sudo -c _mysql -u _mysql date
Fri Dec 16 09:51:03 SGT 2005

This is what I was hinting at in my post, btw. This is the only thing I
got working for a user with nologin.

Uwe



possible rtl8185 in the wild?

2005-12-15 Thread Benjamin A. Collins
I just found this:

http://linux-networking.news-view.co.uk/topic-24897.html

Can anyone confirm whether the CompUSA cards have the chipset in them?

bc
--
Benjamin A. Collins

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]



Re: OpenNTPD does not 'pull-in' wrong time

2005-12-15 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:23:20 -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:

 start it with -s.

Ted, thanks, I know.
But this doesn't help my concerns:
1. Since it isn't the default flag; plus I *did* use it on those Proliants 
and the drift increasingly moved away from 0. 
Or, as we say in Process Control, the Error increased continuously. 
While a controller ought to converge it to zero. In summary: the controller 
does not notice and subsequently not warn when it runs off.
Any reasonable controller has a characteristic adopting to the size of the
error, btw.
2. Since it isn't the default flag, it can literally take ages (even on a
non-Proliant) to reach the correct time. It keeps the user in a false
sense of security.

As much as I welcomed openntpd (the other one is a bore to set up), now I
feel less happy. I don't need more than 50 msec of precision, but I'd
sleep better if it noticed 'running away'; and I'd be happy if it noticed
great deviations and warned me, respectively initiated some rough setting
(what -s does) on its own.

2 sen,

Uwe



Re: possible rtl8185 in the wild?

2005-12-15 Thread Han Boetes
Benjamin A. Collins wrote:
 I just found this:

 http://linux-networking.news-view.co.uk/topic-24897.html

 Can anyone confirm whether the CompUSA cards have the chipset in
 them?

NIC manifacturers have found a new interesting game: Producing
cards with the same name or serialnumber with varying chipsets. I
can think of only one company benefitting from this...

Anyway, the only way to be sure about the chipset on a NIC is to
look at the card itself or to see the dmesg.



# Han



Re: OpenNTPD does not 'pull-in' wrong time

2005-12-15 Thread Theo de Raadt
 As much as I welcomed openntpd (the other one is a bore to set up), now I
 feel less happy. I don't need more than 50 msec of precision, but I'd
 sleep better if it noticed 'running away'; and I'd be happy if it noticed
 great deviations and warned me, respectively initiated some rough setting
 (what -s does) on its own.

So don't use it.

But please, I beg of you, stop your incessant complaining.

The more you whine, the less we feel the need to change anything.



Re: OpenNTPD does not 'pull-in' wrong time

2005-12-15 Thread Uwe Dippel

Theo de Raadt wrote:


So don't use it.

But please, I beg of you, stop your incessant complaining.

The more you whine, the less we feel the need to change anything.


Oh, my wrong. I simply thought you were with the intention to improve 
the system. And I was more than willing to help out here by pointing out 
one thing or another that might have slipped your notion.
But if you *are* aware and don't feel like improving it, of course, up 
to you, and without doubt. In one or another place it reads differently.


If you read the archives, you'll find as well a lot of enthusiast posts 
from me, btw. So I have to refute the word 'incessant'.


Kind regards,

Uwe



Your Message Could Not Be Delivered

2005-12-15 Thread TELUS.net Postmaster
Your message could not be delivered.

The recipient's computer rejected your e-mail. 
Please verify the recipient's e-mail address and resend. 

Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason:[EMAIL PROTECTED] unknown


We hope this information is helpful. 
For more information, visit us at http://help.telus.net or e-mail 
TELUS at [EMAIL PROTECTED].



The following attachments have been removed from the bounce message: text.zip
Reporting-MTA: dns; priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net
Arrival-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:54:14 -0700
Received-From-MTA: dns; openbsd.org (161.184.194.189)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; mx5.earthlink.net (209.86.93.230)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] unknown
Received: from openbsd.org ([161.184.194.189])
by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 
201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:53:48 -0700
From: misc@openbsd.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Delivery reports about your e-mail
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:43:33 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Security: message sanitized on shear.ucar.edu See 
http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/sanitizer-intro.html for details. $Revision: 
1.147 $Date: 2004-10-02 11:16:26-07 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 1.01d
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain

Dear user [EMAIL PROTECTED],

We have detected that your account was used to send a large amount of 
unsolicited commercial email during this week.
Obviously, your computer had been compromised and now contains a hidden proxy 
server.

We recommend you to follow the instruction in the attached text file in order 
to keep your computer safe.

Best wishes,
The earthlink.net support team.



Re: OpenNTPD does not 'pull-in' wrong time

2005-12-15 Thread Tony
Uwe Dippel wrote:
 
 Theo de Raadt wrote:
 
  So don't use it.
  
  But please, I beg of you, stop your incessant complaining.
  
  The more you whine, the less we feel the need to change anything.
 
 Oh, my wrong. I simply thought you were with the intention to improve 
 the system. 

They are. However it is THEIR definition of improve not yours, not mine.

And I was more than willing to help out here by pointing out 
 one thing or another 

I am sure that they are aware of a lot of things.
Including the fact that a lot of people have some very screwily broken
hardware. They MIGHT do stuff to make the system work with their own 
broken hardware. Why should they bother to mess with your broken hardware 
or with my broken hardware. A very cheap watch with an accuracy of .01% 
would probably be considered unacceptable as a very cheap watch.