Re: process.monitor

2010-09-14 Thread Nathan Gibbs
* Nathan Gibbs wrote:
 Just updated the process monitor.

 http://www.cmpublishers.com/oss/
 
Reduced bandwidth usage when the -p option is used.
(Originally, we continued pulling proc table entries after we found the proc )
Code Polishing

Enjoy.


-- 
Sincerely,

Nathan Gibbs

Systems Administrator
Christ Media
http://www.cmpublishers.com




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


process.monitor

2010-08-30 Thread Nathan Gibbs
In celebration of Labor Day ( US ).

The improved process.monitor.
Get it while its hot!

http://www.cmpublishers.com/oss/

Improvements include
Added ability to query for a specific process.
-p option ( nuf said )
Added support for the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB.
-u option ( now you can query everything )
Added connection specific options for timeouts  retries.
-t  -r options ( might as well, since I was at it )
Code Cleanup

Enjoy.

-- 
Sincerely,

Nathan Gibbs

Systems Administrator
Christ Media
http://www.cmpublishers.com




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


process.monitor problems

2005-04-25 Thread Patrick Marquetecken
Hi, when i run
./process.monitor -c More_AcceSS_on_5353 host 10.32.3.51
i get this error:
Can't locate object method new via package SNMP::Session (perhaps you
forgot to load SNMP::Session?) at ./process.monitor line 50.

I use this for testing before i modify my min.cf, how can i solve this ?

TIA
Patrick

___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


Re: process.monitor problems

2005-04-25 Thread Jim Trocki
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
Hi, when i run
./process.monitor -c More_AcceSS_on_5353 host 10.32.3.51
i get this error:
Can't locate object method new via package SNMP::Session (perhaps you
forgot to load SNMP::Session?) at ./process.monitor line 50.
I use this for testing before i modify my min.cf, how can i solve this ?
it sounds like you don't have net-snmp's SNMP perl module installed.
you can get the latest from net-snmp.org. the installation instructions
are in the tarball.
fedora core 3 ships the rpms, so if you're using linux on an rpm-based
system you may want to try to install that instead.
___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


Re: Help with mon and process.monitor

2005-01-11 Thread David Nolan

--On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:07 PM +1100 Craig Reeson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Now I am getting a SNMP timeout issue (using monshow.cgi). I have tried
increasing the timeout in process.monitor but it has made no difference.
However, if I just run 'process.monitor -c mycom 172.28.47.60' then it
works!
I assume your test runs of process.monitor are on the same machine as your 
mon server.  Are you logged in as the user that your mon server runs as? 
i.e. could it be something about your login environment thats allowing the 
script to work.  Can you post a snippet of your mon.cfg, showing the group 
definition and the service definition?

Also, you might want to try running this monitor script to verify that SNMP 
transactions with the target host are working.
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/netsage/mon/mon.d/host.monitor?rev=1.9

(Thats the script we use to verify that the host is responding to snmp, and 
test the load average.)

-David Nolan
Network Software Designer
Computing Services
Carnegie Mellon University
___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


Help with mon and process.monitor

2005-01-10 Thread Craig Reeson
Guys,

I am still having difficulty getting this to work (fixed previous
issues, the mon.cf I was given was wrong).

Now I am getting a SNMP timeout issue (using monshow.cgi). I have tried
increasing the timeout in process.monitor but it has made no difference.

However, if I just run 'process.monitor -c mycom 172.28.47.60' then it
works!

Any ideas? Need more details?

Thanks,

Craig




---
This email and any files transmitted with it are solely intended for the use of 
the addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential and 
privileged.  If you receive this email in error, please advise us by return 
email immediately.  Please also disregard the contents of the email, delete it 
and destroy any copies immediately.
Computershare Limited and its subsidiaries do not accept liability for the 
views expressed in the email or for the consequences of any computer viruses 
that may be transmitted with this email.
This email is also subject to copyright.  No part of it should be reproduced, 
adapted or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright owner.


___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


Checking Perl processes (process.monitor is not suitable)

2001-08-31 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer

I wish to check that a particular process is running. The obvious
solution is: Use process.monitor. But the Net-SNMP's prTable only
stores the name of the executable and can only check it (on the
proc directives of snmpd.conf), not the full command-line. 

Which means that I can check that 'sshd' is running, not that 'perl
foobar.pl' is running. 

The only solution I see is to write my own monitor which will check
host.hrSWRun.hrSWRunTable.hrSWRunEntry.hrSWRunParameters and will test
it against its list (it also have the side-effect of putting the list
of processes to watch in the SNMP client, not in the server).

Comments ?




Re: Checking Perl processes (process.monitor is not suitable)

2001-08-31 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer

On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 12:53:44PM +0100,
 Alex David Shadrach Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
 a message of 13 lines which said:

 How about putting $0 = 'foobar'; at the top of your Perl
 script?

Because it doesn't work. Test it if you don't believe me. (FreeBSD
4.1.1, both ps and snmpd continue to show 'perl'.)