Re: Dual MSX-AUDIO question

2001-12-17 Thread Albert Beevendorp

At 04:36 17-12-01 +, you wrote:
This leads me to yet another slightly lame question - the player seems to
support just about every sound standard possible (except OPM ;) ) and even
has support for four SCCs and two MSX-AUDIOs. Now I understand how the
SCCs work - they map into memory space so that's simply using the slot
system. However, the MSX-AUDIO chip maps into I/O space (C0 and C1) which
is global, so how does the program support more than one of them? Surely
if I plug MSX-AUDIOs into both slots they will conflict with each other?

This second MSX-AUDIO is an adapted version of MSX-AUDIO (Philips Music 
Module) that is mapped to I/O C2 and C3. I think there is an archive 
regarding this 'transformation' from MSX-AUDIO to MSX-AUDIO 2.

It's called AUDIO1-2.PMA and is found on 
ftp://ftp.bifi.msxnet.org/waterland/MUSIC/AUDIO1-2.PMA

IIRC it contains a text file and a Dynamic Publisher file which describes 
the changes.


GreeTz, BiFi

Visit my Home Page at www.bifi.msxnet.org
mail me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FTP: ftp.bifi.msxnet.org
ICQ #36126979

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: Dual MSX-AUDIO question

2001-12-17 Thread Hans Otten

Richard,

Yoa are right about i/o based devices being active in whatever slot you
place them. The slot select system only affects memory space, not I/O space.
It is therefore easy to get a conflict with overlapping i/o addresses,
especially since not all manufacturers did a good job in decoding the i/o
address. Quite often the decoding is so limited that a whole block of i/o
addresses is occupied.

It might be that a slight modification of the I/O addresses of one is required to have 
two Music modules working together with SMe. That mod was published with the SME 
editor. See my website for  a pdf file.

To disable a ROM to have just a SCC funtion, dont desolder the ROM but add a switch. 
Also documented.



--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Bombaman promo available!!

2001-12-17 Thread Team Bomba


Hi people,

Finally, the Bombaman promo is available! In this promo version of the game
you can play 3 single player levels of the game, and also you can play some
multiplayer levels with your friends! The complete game will feature a lot
more, like 6 completely different worlds with 10 levels each, cool
bossmonsters, more multiplayer levels and an involving storyline! If you
have a Moonsound, be sure to plug it in, your Bombaman experience will be
much enhanced :) You can get the promo at our website,
http://bombaman.generation-msx.nl. Be sure to leave any feedback you might
have :)

Greetz,
Team Bomba
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bombaman.generation-msx.nl
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re:

2001-12-17 Thread Yvonne Vogel





ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread ScanMail Attendant

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).

Sender = Yvonne Vogel
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = no subject
Scanning Time = 12/17/2001 19:40:11

Action on virus found:
The attachment images.DOC.pif exists WORM_BADTRANS.B virus. ScanMail has
Deleted it. 

Waarschuwing !
Scanmail heeft een virus gevonden in een email attachment.
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread System Attendant

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).

Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = no subject
Scanning Time = 12/17/2001 19:36:05

Action on virus found:
The attachment images.DOC.pif matched file blocking settings. ScanMail has
Moved it.  The attachment was moved to C:\Program
Files\Trend\Smex\Alert\images.DOC3c1e3b15fd.pif_.

Warning to recipient. ScanMail has detected a virus.
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it)

2001-12-17 Thread Floris 'Tamama' van Gog

This email executes automatically in outlook and writes a kernel32.exe
in your windows or windows\system32 directory, as well as add a 'run'
registry key as 'kernel' with value 'kernel32.exe' so that it will be
re-started the next time you boot. It tries to access a lot of email
servers probably to send itself on.

Of course this didnt work on my computer because my firewall logs all
outgoing connections and by default blocks them ;-)

some smtp servers it tried to use:

my own mail server
mx2.mail.yahoo.com
imap.front.ru
inbound.latemodels.com.criticalpath.net

Interresting virus this hehehe.. I'm sure a lot of you have it now...

Can this list be configured to not allow non-text/html posts?

Floris

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



RE: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) + solution

2001-12-17 Thread Bart Schouten

Instead of saying hehehe you'd better point people to some useful stuff:

This virus only -instantly- affects M$ outlook with PREVIEW panel ON.
Otherwise you'd have to open te specific message to let the virus execute
and then only if you allow PIF or SCR files to execute always without
asking. So, I guess not much people got infected. So, instead of what Floris
says, it does not always execute automatically.

Anyway, a patch from M$ for Outlook is here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-020.asp

A complete removal tool and instructions can be found here:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moval.tool.html

And maybe it is wise to completely deny ANY attachments to this
mailingslist. If any of us wants to share MSX related files, I know for sure
there's always someone with spare webspace of ftp space :)


greets,
Bart.

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it)

2001-12-17 Thread Richard Kilpatrick

In message 004d01c1872c$a11d7e60$960a@tamama, Floris 'Tamama' van
Gog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Interresting virus this hehehe.. I'm sure a lot of you have it now...

It's been going around for some time, and propagates through Outlook
address books - the user often is unaware of it! I use Turnpike for mail
and news, so it won't affect me, but basically - don't open the
attachment!

Richard
-- 
Richard Kilpatrick|\  _,,,---,,_
 Does entropy apply to love? -- RK/,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,
 E-Mail: richardatlovecraft.demon.co.uk|,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'::.
Homepage:  http://www.lovecraft.demon.co.uk/   '''(_/--'  `-'\_)Morticia
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) + solution

2001-12-17 Thread Floris 'Tamama' van Gog

Ooh lighten up.

For one I didn't know the 'usefull' stuff. Second I thought it was a
very funny worm, it was the first one I got that actually got executed.

- Original Message -
From: Bart Schouten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) +
solution


 Instead of saying hehehe you'd better point people to some useful
stuff:

 This virus only -instantly- affects M$ outlook with PREVIEW panel ON.
 Otherwise you'd have to open te specific message to let the virus
execute
 and then only if you allow PIF or SCR files to execute always without
 asking. So, I guess not much people got infected. So, instead of what
Floris
 says, it does not always execute automatically.

 Anyway, a patch from M$ for Outlook is here:
 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS01-020.asp

 A complete removal tool and instructions can be found here:

http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.badtrans.b@m
m.re
 moval.tool.html

 And maybe it is wise to completely deny ANY attachments to this
 mailingslist. If any of us wants to share MSX related files, I know
for sure
 there's always someone with spare webspace of ftp space :)


 greets,
 Bart.

 --
 For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread Harm Verbeek

eh grappig genoeg slaat mijn virusscanner ook op hol bij deze scanmail
messages...
- Original Message -
From: System Attendant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:36 PM
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.


 ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).

 Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject = no subject
 Scanning Time = 12/17/2001 19:36:05

 Action on virus found:
 The attachment images.DOC.pif matched file blocking settings. ScanMail has
 Moved it.  The attachment was moved to C:\Program
 Files\Trend\Smex\Alert\images.DOC3c1e3b15fd.pif_.

 Warning to recipient. ScanMail has detected a virus.
 --
 For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread d-fader

I didn't set anything, using Outlook 6.

PIF's don't get opened automatically here. I got an pop-up dialog in which I
could select 'open', ofcourse I didn't do it, heh, I'm dumb, but not a
moron... Although... Ahwell.. that's something to discuss, but I think ppl
who know a BIT about computers won't open that file manually, since it
doesn't have a subject and it comes from a stranger, and they still got in
mind not to interact with strangers, har!


Then again, maybe I'm wrong...

Just wanted to say Outlook 6 in any case gives you a dialog whether to
execute it and doesn't execute it automatically...


greetz,
d-fader

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) + solution

2001-12-17 Thread Wynke Stulemeijer

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:16:55PM +0100, Bart Schouten wrote:
 
 And maybe it is wise to completely deny ANY attachments to this
 mailingslist. If any of us wants to share MSX related files, I know for sure
 there's always someone with spare webspace of ftp space :)

Has been done. All multipart messages are now blocked. If there are any
problems with legitimate mail not getting through, please notify Maarten
and me.

Wynke.
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) + solution

2001-12-17 Thread Eric Boon

Hi-de-hi,

Just a thought: The majordomo has the list of ppl subscribed
to this mailing list. Why not set up a filter that only accepts mails
from a subscribed address.

Hm, as I'm typing this, I already know the answer: it's pretty
simple to fake a FROM field in a mail, so filtering on that won't
do any good. 

Eric


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) + solution

2001-12-17 Thread Pedro Giebels

 Has been done. All multipart messages are now blocked. If there are any
 problems with legitimate mail not getting through, please notify Maarten
 and me.
 
 Wynke.
Good work Wynke but the users need to have a good Virus scanner.
En keep it up to date. 
Is there a good freeware virus scanner 

Pedro

~gun~

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread David Heremans

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:20:18PM +0100, d-fader wrote:
 I didn't set anything, using Outlook 6.
 
 
 Just wanted to say Outlook 6 in any case gives you a dialog whether to
 execute it and doesn't execute it automatically...

Well, I'm running a save mailclient so it doesn't harm me neither.
Besides I doubt if the code would actually do something on a Linux box
:-)

David

-- 
 Never assume malice when results can be explained
 through incompetence?  -- Napoleon Bonaparte --
 In the case of M$, the distinction can be a difficult one to make
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha


 Well, I'm running a save mailclient so it doesn't harm me neither.
 Besides I doubt if the code would actually do something on a Linux box

It has an effect on MSX and Linux mail clients: it makes the
user ROTFLAL. :)))


Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.adrpage.cjb.net  MSX: more fun per less MHz

Who? Me, worry? - Bill Gates, about problems with Windows

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread Maarten ter Huurne

Hi,

A combined reply:

 PIF's don't get opened automatically here. I got an pop-up dialog in which
 I could select 'open', ofcourse I didn't do it, heh, I'm dumb, but not a
 moron... Although... Ahwell.. that's something to discuss, but I think ppl
 who know a BIT about computers won't open that file manually, since it
 doesn't have a subject and it comes from a stranger, and they still got in
 mind not to interact with strangers, har!

I think this is one of the worms that, in some Outlook versions, get executed 
automatically. The mime type says audio/x-wav which makes Outlook think it's 
safe, so it passes the file on to Windows which doesn't know mime types and 
looks at the .pif extension and then decides to execute it. This is a 
recently discovered Outlook/IE vulnerability.

The list was already configured to block binary attachments. This has stopped 
quite a few worms in the last months. But since this one was 
multipart/alternative, which wasn't recognised as an attachment. Also, it 
was small enough to fit under the size limit.

 Just a thought: The majordomo has the list of ppl subscribed
 to this mailing list. Why not set up a filter that only accepts mails
 from a subscribed address.

 Hm, as I'm typing this, I already know the answer: it's pretty
 simple to fake a FROM field in a mail, so filtering on that won't
 do any good. 

That's not the problem. These worms are sent by infected machines, not by 
people with hostile intentions. It's a simple fixed algorithm, not some 
cracker trying to figure out a hole in the filters. Unless a mailinglist 
member's computer gets infected, the filter you suggest would block the worms.

The problem with that filter is that many legitimate posters also use 
non-subscribed addresses, for example because they read mail at different 
locations or because sometimes someone who isn't subscribed wants to post an 
announcement.

 Good work Wynke but the users need to have a good Virus scanner.
 En keep it up to date. 

Actually, I think virus scanners are only a workaround. The solution to this 
problem would be more care for security from software manufacturers. It would 
help if more users would show some consideration for security, for example by 
making security on of the criteria for selecting their mail client.

Bye,
Maarten
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread Hans Otten

Well, the greatest humor is laughing about  others misery so they say.

I hate virus writers, and so should we all. If enough Linux users or
whatever client users are around the same sick people will attack those
platforms too.

 It has an effect on MSX and Linux mail clients: it makes the
 user ROTFLAL. :)))




--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread David Heremans

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Hans Otten wrote:
 Well, the greatest humor is laughing about  others misery so they say.
 
 I hate virus writers, and so should we all.

Maybe you should hate programs that are security-wise verry crappy.
We don't life in a perfect world. If you leave your door wide open you
musn't be that surprised when a burglar gets in, so start with some
basic security.

 If enough Linux users or
 whatever client users are around the same sick people will attack those
 platforms too.

Well, I disagree.
The problem here is the sick concept of automatically starting attached
programs. And the unability (until Outlook 6) to turn this bloody
behaviour off.

Even for M$platforms here are alternative,more secure mailclients.
Why don't you use them... (laissy, because it came with the defaults
isn't an excuse)

Besides, it is technically much more difficult to make those things on a
*nix box anyhow. (multiple user from he beginning has highten security
awarness from day one)

David



-- 
 Never assume malice when results can be explained
 through incompetence?  -- Napoleon Bonaparte --
 In the case of M$, the distinction can be a difficult one to make
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: email from Yvonne or something (already deleted it) + solution

2001-12-17 Thread Mari van den Broek

Hello,

 Good work Wynke but the users need to have a good Virus scanner.
 En keep it up to date.  Is there a good freeware virus scanner 

Don't wait too long, you know what will happen... I use Norton Antivirus
2002, and I can only say that it works very good... (Stopped this
virus...)...

--[ MARI ]--


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re:[2] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2001-12-17 Thread Francisco Alvarez

David Heremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/12/01 23:46:39:

 I hate virus writers, and so should we all.
 
 Maybe you should hate programs that are security-wise verry crappy.
 We don't life in a perfect world. If you leave your door wide open you
 musn't be that surprised when a burglar gets in, so start with some
 basic security.

Are you working for a Security company or something like that? ;)

I mean, I'm under windows and not using Outlook (thanks Jorrith!), but it's not a 
problem of outlook if a 
virus/worm/trojan/*.* infects your computer... it's the problem of the s*cker who 
created it.

The main difference between your example and computer world is... if I let my door 
being opened and a burglar gets 
in, I can be waiting for him with a gun targeting his head. It's not possible in this 
world. People hide from his 
computer and do sh*t that they can't do if they show themselves. But ok, I accept, 
computer world is full of 
cowards.

Regards,

Saeba


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: Dual MSX-AUDIO question

2001-12-17 Thread Alex Wulms

] It's called AUDIO1-2.PMA and is found on 
] ftp://ftp.bifi.msxnet.org/waterland/MUSIC/AUDIO1-2.PMA
] 
] IIRC it contains a text file and a Dynamic Publisher file which describes 
] the changes.
Please note that the text is in dutch. Still need to translate it to English.


Kind regards,
Alex Wulms


-- 
Visit The MSX Plaza (http://www.inter.nl.net/users/A.P.Wulms) for info on
XelaSoft, Merlasoft, Quadrivium, SD-Snatcher on fMSX, the MSX Hardware list,
XSA Disk images, documentation, Japanese MSX news from Ikeda and lots more.


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: Dual MSX-AUDIO question

2001-12-17 Thread Alex Wulms

] ... - I just heard SME3 player running on my
] NMS8245 with a hacked-up PC disk drive and it's absolutely wonderful!
Thanks :-)


] This leads me to yet another slightly lame question - the player seems to
] support just about every sound standard possible (except OPM ;) ) and even
] has support for four SCCs and two MSX-AUDIOs. Now I understand how the
] SCCs work - they map into memory space so that's simply using the slot
] system. However, the MSX-AUDIO chip maps into I/O space (C0 and C1) which
] is global, so how does the program support more than one of them? Surely
] if I plug MSX-AUDIOs into both slots they will conflict with each other?
According to the MSX2 standard, you can have two (optional) MSX Audio's. One 
on C0/C1. The other on C2/C3. SME3 makes use of this optional feature.

In one of the other mails, you can find a reference to a (dutch) text 
describing how to modify a Philips MSX Music module to listen to port C2/C3 
in stead of C0/C1. The modification exists of installing a switch to switch 
between the two address ranges. Though, it also switches the I/O address of 
the MIDI ports in the music module.


Kind regards,
Alex Wulms


-- 
Visit The MSX Plaza (http://www.inter.nl.net/users/A.P.Wulms) for info on
XelaSoft, Merlasoft, Quadrivium, SD-Snatcher on fMSX, the MSX Hardware list,
XSA Disk images, documentation, Japanese MSX news from Ikeda and lots more.


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: Dual MSX-AUDIO question

2001-12-17 Thread Richard Atkinson

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Alex Wulms wrote:

 ] ... - I just heard SME3 player running on my
 ] NMS8245 with a hacked-up PC disk drive and it's absolutely wonderful!
 Thanks :-)

No problem - a very useful program! I just spent a few hours soldering up
a sampleRAM mod for my Toshiba MSX-AUDIO (NOT an easy job) and have now
also heard the ADPCM bits. Hopefully I'll be able to put the thing back
together with all the wires and things inside the metal shield!

 According to the MSX2 standard, you can have two (optional) MSX Audio's. One
 on C0/C1. The other on C2/C3. SME3 makes use of this optional feature.

Are there any MSX-AUDIO cartridges that come with I/O address C2/C3 by
default? I don't feel like doing another sampleRAM mod ;)

 In one of the other mails, you can find a reference to a (dutch) text
 describing how to modify a Philips MSX Music module to listen to port C2/C3
 in stead of C0/C1. The modification exists of installing a switch to switch
 between the two address ranges. Though, it also switches the I/O address of
 the MIDI ports in the music module.

I eagerly await a translation!


Richard

--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



The virus solution - If you got this virus or are unsure READ THIS E-MAIL for Free virus removal from Symantec

2001-12-17 Thread Darren Forster

Here is the answer Pedro a good freeware scanner (badtrans removal tool!) -
also available from there is Norton AntiVirus

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moval.tool.html

Good work Wynke but the users need to have a good Virus scanner.
En keep it up to date.
Is there a good freeware virus scanner 

Pedro


--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html



Re: The virus solution - If you got this virus or are unsure READ THIS E-MAIL for Free virus removal from Symantec

2001-12-17 Thread Pedro Giebels

 Here is the answer Pedro a good freeware scanner (badtrans removal
tool!) -
 also available from there is Norton AntiVirus
I have Norton antivirus 2002 already.
I just want to know if there is a good freeware Scanner


http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 moval.tool.html
This way a need a tool for every virus




--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html