Re: cmutt xmutt... where?

2000-10-05 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

 On 2000-10-05 00:22:40 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 
   /usr/bin/mutt
   /usr/bin/cmutt
   /usr/bin/xmutt
 
 What on earth are cmutt and xmutt supposed to be?

Shell scripts which wrap around mutt, to set the appropriate term / xterm.
Both by Thomas Ribbrock - emgaron at gmx.net - they seem to be in several RPM
builds I've seen (mine is the 1.25i with cfp from mutt.linuxatwork.at)

I've attached the scripts here, fwiw.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
It's difficult to see the picture when you are inside the frame.


#!/bin/sh

# cmutt - script to call mutt after setting TERM to an appropriate value
# Thomas Ribbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# published under GPL

# set TERM so that an ncurses linked mutt will use colours

# If COLORS has a defined value, we assume that the appropriate TERM
# value was set before = don't touch (thanks to Thomas E. Dickey for this!)
# If it isn't set or is set to -1, no colours are defined and we try to
# set a different TERM value.
#
COLORS=`tput colors 2/dev/null`
if [ -z "$COLORS" -o "$COLORS" = "-1" ] ; then
  if [ -n "$COLORTERM" ]; then
# COLORTERM is set = assume rxvt
TERM=rxvt
  else
# we guess some kind of xterm
TEST=`tput -Txterm-xfree86 colors 2/dev/null`
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  # xterm-xfree86 is known here
  TERM=xterm-xfree86
else
  # not known - we try xterm-color
  # NOTE: xterm-color might have the wrong bce capabilities!!
  #   The linux console, rxvt and the XFree86 xterm have bce, while
  #   xterm-color doesn't, so this is really last resort.
  #   (thanks again to Thomas E. Dickey!)
  TERM=xterm-color
fi
  fi
  export TERM
fi

exec mutt "$@"


#!/bin/sh
#
# xmutt - script to start mutt in a terminal window under X
# Thomas Ribbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED], April 2000
#
# published under GPL
#
# try rxvt first
which rxvt  /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  rxvt -tn rxvt -T Mutt -e mutt
else
  # try xterm next
  which xterm  /dev/null
  if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
# with xterm, the correct setting for TERM is not so clear,
# so we leave it to the cmutt script and hope for the best...
xterm -T Mutt -e cmutt
  fi
fi  



Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Michael Tatge

Hal Burgiss muttered:
 Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even.
 Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the
 exceptions.
 
 
 unset use_from

Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't
hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though.

 send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

These _have_ to work. If they don't, I'd suspect that there is
something else disturbing. Just copy / pasted your send-hooks into my
mutt - they work. Please post your whole muttrc.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at
least until we've finished building it.

PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65  40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13



mutt and pgp signatures

2000-10-05 Thread Anand Buddhdev

I've recently started to use GnuPG 1.0.1 with mutt 1.2i. I notice a small
problem:

1. If I receive a message with a PGP signature attached, and view it with
mutt, gpg claims that it's a bad signature, even if the signature is good,
in certain circumstances. In particular, this happens if the incoming
message has the double-dash-space signature in the message body, eg:

Hi Anand

blah blah blah.

--
Friend

If a message is sent to me without the double-dash signature, the pgp
signature verification succeeds. More interestingly, if the space after the
double-dash is removed, the signature verification ALSO SUCCEEDS. Now I
know that the convention for signatures is '-- \n', but that space somehow
seems to be breaking gpg's ability to verify PGP signatures. Anyone have
any idea why this might be so?

-- 
Anand



Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:30:40AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:29:30PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:25:47PM -0600, Harold Oga wrote:
  
  send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  send-hook '~C redhat-list' 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 
 No, sorry, it does not work. Neither does '~t'. ??? 
 Hi,
Hmm, strange.  I just tried it here, and it works fine for me.  Not sure
 why it doesn't work for you.  Just to be clear, what exactly is happening?
 Is the From: always being set to From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 or is something else happening?

Yes,  Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] is it. Despite many
variations. Unless I am going crazy, this was working fine not too
long ago. I suspect something else upgraded is messing with things.
But I can't think what that would be. Thanks.

-- 
Hal B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
 Hal Burgiss muttered:
  Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even.
  Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the
  exceptions.
  
  
  unset use_from
 
 Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't
 hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though.

I'll try that. That came from an example in the original Muttrc when I
first installed a couple of years ago.
 
  send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 
 These _have_ to work. If they don't, I'd suspect that there is
 something else disturbing. Just copy / pasted your send-hooks into my
 mutt - they work. Please post your whole muttrc.

http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc

-- 
Hal B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



Re: Addressbook For Mutt

2000-10-05 Thread Pyuesh Daya

Is it possible to run two external programs to run with mutt.  I am already running 
the "Shift Q" to query an external perl script which queries an Ldap ServerIs this 
possible...

How do I bind another stroke key to query another external Program !!

Regards

On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 09:42:55PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
 On Tue, 03 Oct 2000, Adahma wrote:
 
  I've not seen abook before, but it's very nice.  Is there a way to
  integrate it closely with mutt, such as if I hit tab when
  addressing a mail, it would send me there and allow me to select and
  pull addresses back into mutt.
 
 Have a look at the query feature of mutt (chapter "4.5. External
 Address Queries" in the mutt manual).  You should try something like
  set query_command="abook --mutt-query '%s'"
 
 Then you can use Ctrl-q (like TAB) to expand a query string to the
 addressbook entry.
 
 Alternatively you can use abook as a backend of lbdb (see lbdb
 documentation for more information about this).
 
  And if I hit 'a' to add an alias, it would add to abook, rather than
  my mutt alias file.
 
 Don't know, whether this is possible (never used abook myself), but it
 shouldn't be hard to write a little script which appends the address
 to ~/.abook.addressbook.  Maybe this could be based on mail2muttalias
 (http://webrum.uni-mannheim.de/jura/moritz/mail2muttalias.shtml).
 
 Tscho
 
 Roland
 
 -- 
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
---end quoted text---



Minor bug in the manual?

2000-10-05 Thread Dave Pearson

In section 3.6 of the mutt (1.2.5i) manual it says:

,
|   Note: Macro definitions (if any) listed in the help screen(s), are
|   silently truncated at the screen width, and are not wrapped.
`

but if I look in the help screen of my mutt at my macros they *are* wrapped.
Is this simply a case of the manual being behind the application?

-- 
Take a look in Hagbard's World: | mutt.octet.filter - autoview octet-streams
http://www.hagbard.demon.co.uk/ | mutt.vcard.filter - autoview simple vcards
http://www.acemake.com/hagbard/ | muttrc2html   - muttrc - HTML utility
Free software, including| muttrc.sl - Jed muttrc mode



Re: Addressbook For Mutt

2000-10-05 Thread Roland Rosenfeld

On Thu, 05 Oct 2000, Pyuesh Daya wrote:

 Is it possible to run two external programs to run with mutt.  I am
 already running the "Shift Q" to query an external perl script which
 queries an Ldap ServerIs this possible...

If you are only talking about Shift-Q (not Ctrl-T), it should be easy
to define some macros, which change query_command and run query after
this.  Something like:

macro index \eq ":set query_command=\"abook --mutt-query '%s'\"\nquery"
macro index Q   ":set query_command=\"ldap_query '%s'\"\nquery"

(not tested!!!)

So ESC q queries abook, while Shift-Q queries ldap.

I personally suggest to use lbdb for situations like this, because
lbdb is able to collect data from different sources by simply
including special modules.  The only problem with this is, that nobody
wrote a LDAP module yet...

Tscho

Roland

-- 
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *



Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
 Hal Burgiss muttered:
  
  unset use_from
 
 Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't
 hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though.

Still no go.

-- 
Hal B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



Re: Addressbook For Mutt

2000-10-05 Thread David Champion

On 2000.10.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Pyuesh Daya" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is it possible to run two external programs to run with mutt.  I am already running 
the "Shift Q" to query an external perl script which queries an Ldap ServerIs 
this possible...
 
 How do I bind another stroke key to query another external Program !!

Assuming you want to query both sources each time, I'd just use a
wrapper:
#!/bin/sh
for query_source in local ldap qi; do
mutt_query_${query_source} "$*"
done | sort | uniq

set query_command="query_wrapper '%s'"

or something like that.  All untested, of course; I only use one
directory source.

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago



Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Peter Jaques

do you have 'autoedit' set? if you do, here's what happens: when you hit
'm' to start a message, there is no recipient specified, so 'from' gets set
to the default value. you have to let mutt prompt for the recipient before
you edit, so that it can set the 'from' header.

peter

On  5 Oct 00,  7:49AM, Hal Burgiss wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
  Hal Burgiss muttered:
   Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even.
   Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the
   exceptions.
   
   
   unset use_from
  
  Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't
  hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though.
 
 I'll try that. That came from an example in the original Muttrc when I
 first installed a couple of years ago.
  
   send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
   send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  
  These _have_ to work. If they don't, I'd suspect that there is
  something else disturbing. Just copy / pasted your send-hooks into my
  mutt - they work. Please post your whole muttrc.
 
 http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc
 
 -- 
 Hal B
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --

-- 
Peter Jaques [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://cs.oberlin.edu/~pjaques
klezmerbalkanturkish clarinet; free foodshelter; books to prisoners




Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 05 Oct 2000:
 FWIW, I've been trying to do something very similar... mutt 1.2.5i
 
 send-hook . 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 send-hook .*lugnet\.com 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 
 from what I can tell, the send hook DOES work, only AFTER I actually send
 the mail...  so if I write a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], my from is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
 but the next mail is from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"...
 
 what am I missing?

You can't use "set from" to change the current message's From header.
It is *only* used as a default from header value for new messages
(new mails and replies too unless $reverse_name comes into effect).

If you want to set the From header from a send-hook, you must use
"my_hdr From:".


Regards,
Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy  scifi, the Corrs /
ST, DS9: FRofA #1: Once you have their money ... never give it back.



newbie problems with mutt, postfix and imap.

2000-10-05 Thread Robert Nelson

Hi, 

On my home linux box, I'm trying to switch from NS messenger to mutt and
postfix.
I want to read/send from my university imap/smtp servers and am having
some problems:

1. I am able to read mail from imap.princeton.edu, 
but sent mail never arrives at its destination -- even though
it shows up in my imap Sent mail folder. It also doesn't bounce back!

I think this is a postfix problem, so here are the relevent parts of 
my /etc/postfix/main.cf file:

(Note:I don't understand if relayhost= is supposed to be 
my university smtp server, or my ISP smtp server: I have 
tried both and neither seems to work.)

/etc/postfix/main.cf
---

myhostname = imap.Princeton.EDU
mydomain=Princeton.EDU
relayhost = smtp.Princeton.EDU
#relayhost=smtpout.bellatlantic.net

masquerade_domains = Princeton.EDU
default_transport = smtp

myorigin = $mydomain
mydestination = $myhostname

-- 


2. I can't create new folders on my imap server with mutt.  


I can read existing mail folders on my imap server. But 
if I try to save mail with "s" to a new mailbox it complains that the
mailbox
doesn't exit. If I try to create a new mailbox while in the directory
listing
with "n" it says I get the error message "creating mailboxes is not yet
supported".

But I am using mutt 1.2.5i  compiled with --enable-imap, which IS
supposed
to support creation/deletion of IMAP folders


Here are the relevent lines from my .muttrc file are:
--
set hostname="imap.princeton.edu"
set spoolfile={imap.princeton.edu}
set folder={imap.princeton.edu}
fcc-hook ~A {imap.princeton.edu}Sent
--

Any help on (1) and (2) above is greatly appreciated.

-rob


-- 
Robert W. Nelson
Center for Energy  Environmental Studies
von Neumann Building
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ  08544-5263

Phone: (609) 258-5692
Fax: (609) 258-3661
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-05 Thread Dennis Melentyev

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:46:34AM -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
 Ok, does anyone know of a mailing list where i might be able to ask such
 questions? Obviously this is annoying you all. Just to respond to Claus's
 questions:
 
  2. I don't see your problem
 the problem is that the return-path is getting set to be the very first
 sending address, ie mugwort@localhost. this makes the mailing list software
 reject the message, since that address is not subscribed. 
Headers 'Received from' is NOT for replying and so on. In my message you'd
see the same headers, but all mailers should reply to me correctly. e.g. to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], not to dennis@localhost

If you've the software, that relying on Received from's you need to change
it urgent! (IMHO)

-- 
Dennis Melentyev 
C/C++ programmer @ Mebius-KB, Kiev, Ukraine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Re: mutt and pgp signatures

2000-10-05 Thread Jeremy Blosser

Anand Buddhdev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 I've recently started to use GnuPG 1.0.1 with mutt 1.2i. I notice a small
 problem:
 
 1. If I receive a message with a PGP signature attached, and view it with
 mutt, gpg claims that it's a bad signature, even if the signature is good,
 in certain circumstances. In particular, this happens if the incoming
 message has the double-dash-space signature in the message body, eg:
 
 Hi Anand
 
 blah blah blah.
 
 --
 Friend
 
 If a message is sent to me without the double-dash signature, the pgp
 signature verification succeeds. More interestingly, if the space after the
 double-dash is removed, the signature verification ALSO SUCCEEDS. Now I
 know that the convention for signatures is '-- \n', but that space somehow
 seems to be breaking gpg's ability to verify PGP signatures. Anyone have
 any idea why this might be so?

Someone else will know the details better than I do, but it has to do with
pgp/gpg matching the '-- ' as something it isn't.  This is the purpose of
things like mutt's $pgp_strict_enc variable:

### pgp_strict_enc
### Type: boolean
### Default: set
### If set, Mutt will automatically encode PGP/MIME signed messages as
### quoted-printable. Please note that unsetting this variable may lead to
### problems with non-verifyable PGP signatures, so only change this if you
### know what you are doing.

Of course, this has to be handled on the sender's end, so you may need to
tell your friends to fix their clients to handle this correctly.

-- 
Jeremy Blosser   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-+-+--
the crises posed a question / just beneath the skin
the virtue in my veins replied / that quitters never win

 PGP signature


Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss

Peter Jaques muttered:

   Please post your whole muttrc.
  http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc
 do you have 'autoedit' set?

He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is
obvious - give up that autoedit stuff.

HTH,

Michael
-- 
Our informal mission is to improve the love life of operators worldwide.
-- Peter Behrendt, president of Exabyte

PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65  40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13



Re: Mutt and Maildir?

2000-10-05 Thread Jason Helfman

If you have root on your machine, add this to /etc/profile:

MAIL="/home/$USER/Maildir/"
MAILDIR="/home/$USER/Maildir/"

then source your /etc/profile, or log out and then back in.

Hope this helps.

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 05:45:18PM +0100, Paul muttered:
| Hello,
| 
| I am completely new to the list.
| Many people I know have switched to Mutt as e-mail program. I have
| installed it (RPMversion 1.2.5) but I can't make sense of it.
| 
| For mail I use Qmail, and as mailbox-format I use the maildir format. My
| mail arrives in ~/Maildir.
| 
| Through some nifty website I have tried to generate a .muttrc file, put it
| on disk, and of course, it does not work. When I start Mutt I am presented
| with a default message "Do not delete this mail" bla bla, as the header of
| an mbox mail-file.
| 
| In all kinds of files I have read that Mutt is able to determine by itself
| what mailboxes it should use, but alas, not with me.
| Can someone point me to the right direction? I can't decide if I like Mutt
| as mailer if I can't even get it to work, right?
| 
| Regards,
| Paul
| Netherlands.
| 
| --
| Three things are certain:
| Death, taxes and lost data.
| Guess which has occured.
| 
| http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
|   -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-
| 

-- 
/Jason G Helfman

"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."

Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96  2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org  Get Private!  1024D/35A1C149



Re: Mutt and Maildir?

2000-10-05 Thread Paul

It was Oct 5, 2000, 11:42, when Jason Helfman keyboarded:

If you have root on your machine, add this to /etc/profile:

MAIL="/home/$USER/Maildir/"
MAILDIR="/home/$USER/Maildir/"

then source your /etc/profile, or log out and then back in.

These set's are already in place. Works without a problem for Pine, but
Mutt does not see things that way.
I even have put 

set folder = /home/paul/Maildir/
set mbox_type = maildir

in .muttrc. To no avail.
Thank you for trying though.  :)

Paul

--
Three things are certain:
Death, taxes and lost data.
Guess which has occured.

http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
  -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-






Re: Mutt and Maildir?

2000-10-05 Thread Jason Helfman

Was mutt install previous to your build of Qmail? You may need to
rebuild it. I always compiled Qmail first, and then Mutt.

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:09:11PM +0100, Paul muttered:
| It was Oct 5, 2000, 11:42, when Jason Helfman keyboarded:
| 
| If you have root on your machine, add this to /etc/profile:
| 
| MAIL="/home/$USER/Maildir/"
| MAILDIR="/home/$USER/Maildir/"
| 
| then source your /etc/profile, or log out and then back in.
| 
| These set's are already in place. Works without a problem for Pine, but
| Mutt does not see things that way.
| I even have put 
| 
| set folder = /home/paul/Maildir/
| set mbox_type = maildir
| 
| in .muttrc. To no avail.
| Thank you for trying though.  :)
| 
| Paul
| 
| --
| Three things are certain:
| Death, taxes and lost data.
| Guess which has occured.
| 
| http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
|   -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-
| 
| 
| 

-- 
/Jason G Helfman

"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."

Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96  2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org  Get Private!  1024D/35A1C149



Re: Mutt and Maildir?

2000-10-05 Thread Paul

It was Oct 5, 2000, 12:22, when Jason Helfman keyboarded:

Was mutt install previous to your build of Qmail? You may need to
rebuild it. I always compiled Qmail first, and then Mutt.

I downloaded the prebuilt RPM (i686) from ftp.cdrom.com and installed that
last night.

Qmail is running here since 6 months, and I did compile that by hand so to
speak. It runs flawlessly.

Paul

--
Three things are certain:
Death, taxes and lost data.
Guess which has occured.

http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
  -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-




Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Harold Oga

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:08:48PM +0200, Hal Burgiss wrote:
Peter Jaques muttered:

   Please post your whole muttrc.
  http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc
 do you have 'autoedit' set?

He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is
obvious - give up that autoedit stuff.
Hi,
   No, I don't think autoedit has anything to do with the problem.  I have 
autoedit set in my .muttrc, and the send-hooks that Hal posted work fine for
me.  I don't see anything obviously wrong in Hal's muttrc file either though.

-Harold
-- 
"Life sucks, deal with it!"



Re: Mutt and Maildir?

2000-10-05 Thread Jeremy Blosser

Paul [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
 It was Oct 5, 2000, 12:22, when Jason Helfman keyboarded:
 
 Was mutt install previous to your build of Qmail? You may need to
 rebuild it. I always compiled Qmail first, and then Mutt.
 
 I downloaded the prebuilt RPM (i686) from ftp.cdrom.com and installed that
 last night.

You might try recompiling Mutt yourself, either directly from source or
from a source RPM.

Otheriwse, can you give us the output of 'mutt -v' ?

-- 
Jeremy Blosser   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-+-+--
the crises posed a question / just beneath the skin
the virtue in my veins replied / that quitters never win

 PGP signature


Re: Send hook question

2000-10-05 Thread Hal Burgiss

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:08:48PM +0200, Hal Burgiss wrote:
 Peter Jaques muttered:
 
Please post your whole muttrc.
   http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc
  do you have 'autoedit' set?
 
 He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is
 obvious - give up that autoedit stuff.
 

Yea, it works fine with autoedit off, but I like autoedit too :(

You confuse me with your from header for a minute ;) 

-- 
Hal B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--



Newbie questions

2000-10-05 Thread Perry The Cynic

Dear Mutt experts,

I'm a new mutt user (moved over from pine for the threads :-), and after
using the program for a few weeks (and reading the manual, twice)
am now reaching the point where I know what I don't know. :-)

How do I "commit" files marked for deletion? I realize they get removed
when I change mailboxes/folders, but isn't there a command that means
"discard all deleted messages in the current folder NOW"? (The pine
command I'm thinking of is 'x', which is rather unfortunate. :-)
Alternatively, is there any way to hide (not display) deleted messages?

My mail folders are in ~/mail (lowercase), so I use the startup command
set folder=~/mail
After that, I can refer to my folders as =foldername, which is dandy, but
means I have to type a leading "=" every time I change folders with the
:change-folder command. Is there a way to *not* have to type the initial
"=" character? It works of course if I chdir to ~/mail before running
mutt, but that's a wee bit lame.

For that matter, is there any way I can type a prefix (say, "ord"
for "orders") with some kind of auto-completion of folder names?
I've figured out cTAB/ordRETURNRETURN, but that's hardly
a savings in keystrokes, though it does work with arbitrary substrings. Is
there a way to write a macro-with-argument, so I could turn this into the
sequence (bound to, say, the "C" key) CordRETURN? [The point being, of
course, that *after* I type in the argument and hit return, it continues
to run the macro, in that case RETURNRETURN.]

Oh, and thanks a lot for mutt. It feels pretty good to an old UNIX horse
like me.
  -- perry
---
Perry The Cynic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To a blind optimist, an optimistic realist must seem like an Accursed Cynic.
---



Re: Newbie questions

2000-10-05 Thread Myrddin

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:25:41PM -0700, Perry The Cynic wrote:
 Dear Mutt experts,
 
 I'm a new mutt user (moved over from pine for the threads :-), and after
 using the program for a few weeks (and reading the manual, twice)
 am now reaching the point where I know what I don't know. :-)
 
 How do I "commit" files marked for deletion? I realize they get removed
 when I change mailboxes/folders, but isn't there a command that means
 "discard all deleted messages in the current folder NOW"? (The pine
 command I'm thinking of is 'x', which is rather unfortunate. :-)
 Alternatively, is there any way to hide (not display) deleted messages?

I too was a pine refugee.

I put this in my .muttrc so that 'x' does what it does in pine:

   bind index x  sync-mailbox

- Myrddin
--
 ICQ: 22404528   Why Vegan?   http://www.firstmagic.com/vegan
--



Re: newbie problems with mutt, postfix and imap.

2000-10-05 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Using a large mallet, Robert Nelson whacked out:

 1. I am able to read mail from imap.princeton.edu, 
 but sent mail never arrives at its destination -- even though
 it shows up in my imap Sent mail folder. It also doesn't bounce back!
 
 Likely a postfix problem, as you said.  Type mailq at the root prompt and see
 what it says ...
 
 I think this is a postfix problem, so here are the relevent parts of 
 my /etc/postfix/main.cf file:
 
 (Note:I don't understand if relayhost= is supposed to be 
 my university smtp server, or my ISP smtp server: I have 
 tried both and neither seems to work.)
 
 Depends on whether you are connected to your home ISP or your university lan.
 Maybe one or the other requires SMTP-AUTH or something similar?
 
 myhostname = imap.Princeton.EDU
 mydomain=Princeton.EDU
 relayhost = smtp.Princeton.EDU
 #relayhost=smtpout.bellatlantic.net
 
 This _should_ work ideally, where is mutt putting the mails you are sending,
 and where does postfix's mail queue reside?
 
 with "n" it says I get the error message "creating mailboxes is not yet
 supported".
 
 What imap is that?  It might be broken - or you have a permissions problem
 somewhere.
 
 But I am using mutt 1.2.5i  compiled with --enable-imap, which IS
 supposed to support creation/deletion of IMAP folders
 
 Depends on your imap server as well ... can you create imap folders using
 (say) pine?
 
-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Lumber Cartel India - tinlcI
mallet @ cluestick.org + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
Oh Dad!  We're ALL Devo!