Re: char sets (was Re: mail-followup-to standard.... though it shouldn't have been)
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 03:18]: | My charset value is | | :set ?charset | charset=iso-8859-1 So is mine. | so I should think that it would be fine. Does anyone have any idea what | might be up? Except for this incredibly long list of patches, most values are the same with me. Unless anybody else has a clue, I suggest you take a peek at my box, test it by sending mail to it, and fix it ;) GL, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To be patriotic, hate all nations but your own; to be religious, all sects but your own; to be moral, all pretenses but your own. -- Lionel Strachey msg21071/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: binding and slow reaction
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:48:35PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: Can anyone tell me why this: bind pager \e exit Causes there to be a full 1 second delay, after hitting Esc, before it actually quits the pager? man ncurses ESCDELAY Specifies the total time, in milliseconds, for which ncurses will await a character sequence, e.g., a function key. The default value, 1000 milliseconds, is enough for most uses. However, it is made a vari- able to accommodate unusual applications. (it's hardcoded in slang, btw) -- -Brian Clark % egrep -i pager= ~/.muttrc set pager=builtin % mutt -v Mutt 1.3.23i (2001-10-09) Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 2.2.19 [using ncurses 5.2] -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
matching in hooks
Hi there, I started playing with hooks, and can't get one thing to work: Let's say I want to have a different signature when mailing/replying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I put this in my .muttrc: send-hook . 'set signature = ~/bin/signature|' send-hook '~e john@doe\\.com' 'set signature=FUBAR' When I start mutt with this config, and locate a mail from john doe with /~e john@doe\.com (i. e. the pattern matches), and hit r, I get the regular signature, not the customized one. What ad I doing wrong? TIA -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 12:03PM up 42 days, 22:46, 13 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.06, 0.05
Re: matching in hooks
* Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 12:06]: | Hi there, | | I started playing with hooks, and can't get one thing to work: | | Let's say I want to have a different signature when mailing/replying to | [EMAIL PROTECTED] I put this in my .muttrc: | | send-hook . 'set signature = ~/bin/signature|' | send-hook '~e john@doe\\.com' 'set signature=FUBAR' | | When I start mutt with this config, and locate a mail from john doe with | /~e john@doe\.com | (i. e. the pattern matches), and hit r, I get the regular signature, not | the customized one. | | What ad I doing wrong? Spotted in TFM: ~e EXPR message which contains EXPR in the ``Sender'' field In your scenario, John Doe isn't the sender, *you* are the sender. John Doe was the sender of the mail you received from him, but since you're replying, there is a new message, which contains John Doe as recipient, not as sender. You'll probably want one of these: ~C, ~c or ~t. HTH, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) If you want to make God laugh, tell him about your plans. -Woody Allen msg21074/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: a couple more questions
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:45:30AM -0500, Paul Brannan wrote: 2) Can I set up vim to place the cursor in the To field automatically when composing a message? vim +/^To: But, why does the header even appear in your message when you load it into vi? Doesn't mutt handle the message header and just send the body to your editor? Cheers, - Paul -- Paul Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: a couple more questions
* Paul Roberts Student lab engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 12:32]: | On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:45:30AM -0500, Paul Brannan wrote: | | | 2) Can I set up vim to place the cursor in the To field automatically | when composing a message? | | vim +/^To: | | But, why does the header even appear in your message when you load it | into vi? Doesn't mutt handle the message header and just send the body | to your editor? It's customizable: check out the edit_headers variable. Bye, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions --but I don't always agree with them. -George Bush, US President msg21076/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: a bunch of newbie questions
Rene, et al -- ...and then Ren? Clerc said... % * Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 00:05]: % % | mark_old unset, new messages stay new (until read), and messages % | marked_old become new when you leave the mailbox (just try it). % % Aha! I didn't know this; this explains a lot! I wasn't familiar with % this behaviour, and even think it can be considered a bug. Worse yet, it's not when you leave the mailbox but when you enter it again, and then manually setting mark_old on does nothing. I didn't figure this out until I tried writing the mailbox with some 'O'ld messages over and over and over again and then finally got back in with mutt -F /dev/null -f =boxname and found them 'O'ld as I expected but as they never were upon re-entry. % % | The % | patch changes the behaviour in respect with old messages and unset % | mark_old, the messages stay old (and new messages stay new). % % I see! Like I said, I would've already expected this behaviour. Yep. This is another patch that will go into my cocktail. % % Excusez-moi! % % -- % René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) % % It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. % -Douglas Adams :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21082/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: a bunch of newbie questions
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 14:34]: | % | The | % | patch changes the behaviour in respect with old messages and unset | % | mark_old, the messages stay old (and new messages stay new). | % | % I see! Like I said, I would've already expected this behaviour. | | Yep. This is another patch that will go into my cocktail. Watch it, or you'll get drunk ;) -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) About the use of language: it is impossible to sharpen a pencil with a blunt ax. It is equally vain to try to do it with ten blunt axes instead. -Edsger Dijkstra msg21083/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 15:40]: | * Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-05 14:44]: | But I'd like to have something similar when composing a new mail, but | unfortunately $attribution and $post_indent_string are only for | replying. Is there a equivalent way for new mails or is it possible to | implement a workaround in an easy manner? It would be great, if the %n | can be used to insert the Realname like in $attribution. | I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you | want. In any case, ask your editor (and its command line), not Mutt. How about filtering the message through some home-made baking^W script? -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Acting doesn't bring anything to a text. On the contrary, it detracts from it. -Marguerite Duras msg21086/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
Thorsten Haude wrote: I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you want. Thanks, but I use emacs. In any case, ask your editor (and its command line), not Mutt. I often read this answer (and I accept it). But I thought that if mutt supports $attribution/$post_indent_string for reply, why it doesn't do it for new mail? I hoped that I simply didn't found the solution in the man-page. And the reason my $EDITOR can't do it completely is to do the %n thing (like in $attribution). Another reason to think that mutt can help me. Cheerio, -volker -- http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ Do something unusual today. Pay a bill. msg21087/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
Volker -- ...and then Volker Moell said... % Thorsten Haude wrote: % % I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you % want. % % Thanks, but I use emacs. I think he was providing it as a starting base that you could adapt :-) % % % In any case, ask your editor (and its command line), not Mutt. % % I often read this answer (and I accept it). But I thought that if mutt % supports $attribution/$post_indent_string for reply, why it doesn't do ... % And the reason my $EDITOR can't do it completely is to do the %n thing % (like in $attribution). Another reason to think that mutt can help me. I don't get it, though. Those variables reference data from the replied mail. What on earth do you expect to have in them when you're starting a new mail? % % % Cheerio, % % -volker % % -- % http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ % % Do something unusual today. Pay a bill. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21088/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Command line options
I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5. I installed mutt last week, so my experience is one week old. I want my database to e-mail files to intranet users. This is done with the command; mutt -s test -a test.file username Instead of mutt sending the request I am prompted with To:username enter Then I get Subject:test enter Then vi starts, I have to type a message in vi and save. Then the mutt console starts and I press y to send. Can you please help me with the config settings that I am missing. Also, the only version I could get working is the version that I found on the skunkware CD-ROM. Thanks in advance BW __ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
Moin, * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-05 15:57]: % I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you % want. % Thanks, but I use emacs. I think he was providing it as a starting base that you could adapt :-) No; NEdit's macro language is mercifully unsimilar to Lisp. Thorsten -- It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. - Voltaire
change folder traversal order
Hello, not good behaviour: cEnter folder1 [there are new messages, but i don't want to read them now] cEnter folder2 [I read all messages] cEnter folder1 is it possible to configure mutt that it jumped to folder3, not folder1? Thanks ;) Paulius
Re: Command line options
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:20:38AM -0800, Barney Wells wrote: I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5. I installed mutt last week, so my experience is one week old. I want my database to e-mail files to intranet users. This is done with the command; mutt -s test -a test.file username mutt -x -s test -a test.file username /dev/null -- Regards Cliff
Re: Command line options
Barney -- ...and then Barney Wells said... % I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5. Wow, that's pretty old :-) % I installed mutt last week, so my experience % is one week old. I want my database to e-mail % files to intranet users. This is done with the command; % % mutt -s test -a test.file username % % Instead of mutt sending the request I am prompted with ... Since you've provided no message body (with something like echo testing | mutt -s test -a test.file username or mutt -s test -a test.file username /dev/null as examples) mutt gives you the opportunity to provide it. ... % Can you please help me with the config settings that I am missing. No config; just usage :-) % % Also, the only version I could get working is the version that % I found on the skunkware CD-ROM. I take it, then, that you've downloaded some fairly current source (1.2.5, 1.3.x) and tried to compile it on your box... What sorts of problems did you have? % % Thanks in advance % BW HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21093/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: char sets (was Re: mail-followup-to standard.... though it shouldn't have been)
David T-G muttered: % | % René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Interesting... Your accented e showed up as backslash-three-five-one in the pager My charset value is :set ?charset charset=iso-8859-1 so I should think that it would be fine. Does anyone have any idea what might be up? What are your LC settings? Mine are: LANG=en_US LANGUAGE=en_US:en and LC_ALL=en_US Works like charm. :) HTH, Michael -- I've run DOOM more in the last few days than I have the last few months. I just love debugging ;-) (Linus Torvalds) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
From: and From
Hi, For all mailing-list I use a special address : [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of my primary one. Under mutt I've set a sender-hook to setup correctly the header: send-hook . 'my_hdr From: christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~l' 'my_hdr From: christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED]' But after a reject on a mailing-list I've noticed that the mail contains the correct address in the 'From: ' header line but not in the first line of the header 'From '. I guess that mutt perhaps use the adress in /etc/email-addreses for the first 'From ' line. Is this normal? I've tested with balsa, and the both From lines are correct (So this is not a exim problem). You can check header in this mail. Christophe -- Christophe Barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E msg21095/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
David T-G wrote: I don't get it, though. Those variables reference data from the replied mail. What on earth do you expect to have in them when you're starting a new mail? In replied messages it's the realname part in From:, so now I want the realname part in To: (prompted after typing m). Is this so illogical? Seeya, -volker -- http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ 98% of all statistics are useless. msg21096/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
* Volker Moell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: In replied messages it's the realname part in From:, so now I want the realname part in To: (prompted after typing m). Is this so illogical? It is when you allow editing of headers (doesn't everybody? :) I'd recommend allowing editing of headers and writing a macro to fill in the gaps from them before it's written. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
Re: patch-1.3.23.cd.edit_threads-6[.CYA] not working
Hi, On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 Cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether: * Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11/30/01 17:39]: Or wait a little... I will rewrite the patch so that it can work along with the new threading code. Done. I'll take the latter option. Thanks ! You'll find the patch updated for the new threading implementation at http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/ Works like a charm ! Thanks ! pv. -- Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]What, me worry ? http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/Don't Panic ! -- msg21098/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: binding and slow reaction
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 08:19]: Meanwhile, if you first exit and then delete, you should move to the next unread and not be in the pager. In either case, you wouldn't need the next-unread in your macro, so I suspect that you have resolve=no. OK, I checked out my .muttrc and I do have resolve unset. So there's my whole problem with the move-to-the-next-message thing. % Which is basically what I was trying to do (Del, Esc to close, then % arrow down). Did you specifically want to not be back in the pager? That looks like the factor that will decide how you might rewrite. Yep, I wanted to exit the pager. HTH HAND Thanks, David -- -Brian Clark
Re: binding and slow reaction
* Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 04:49]: man ncurses ESCDELAY Specifies the total time, in milliseconds, for which ncurses will await a character sequence, e.g., a function key. The default value, 1000 milliseconds, is enough for most uses. However, it is made a vari- able to accommodate unusual applications. (it's hardcoded in slang, btw) OK, this is bordering on confusion (mine), but I decided to go with another key because I'm still checking out all of Mutt's features and would rather not FUBAR the Esc key combinations. I see that I am using ncurses, though. (.deb mutt package) Thanks for the heads-up. -- -Brian Clark
Re: patch-1.3.23.cd.edit_threads-6[.CYA] not working
Hi Prahlad, You'll find the patch updated for the new threading implementation at http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/ Works like a charm ! Thanks ! I'm afraid that's not entirely true: there was a nasty bug in patch-1.3.24.cd.edit_threads.7 This is fixed in edit_threads.8, that I've just uploaded at http://cedricduval.free.fr/download/patch-1.3.24.cd.edit_threads.8 Sorry for the inconvenience, -- Cedric msg21101/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: From: and From
I believe you want to set envelope_from to force your envelope adderess to be the same as your From: address. me
highlighting unread messages in the index
In the index, unread messages show up as bold (bright white). When I select a message using the cursor, it shows up as a normal (light grey) foreground with a blue background. Unfortunately, this is the same color as a read message, so it is difficult to tell whether a message is new without moving the cursor or looking at the flags at the left. Is there any way I can make a highlighted unread message show up bold? Here's the relevant portion of my .muttrc: color normal defaultdefault color index brightwhitedefault ~N color index brightwhitedefault ~O color indicator defaultblue TIA, Paul
Re: patch-1.3.23.cd.edit_threads-6[.CYA] not working
Hi, * Cedric Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-12-05 20:19]: This is fixed in edit_threads.8 I have just patched in all three of your changes in 1.3.24i. While patching, I got one error each (with different line numbers): - - - Schnipp - - - can't find file to patch at input line 715 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |--- PATCHES~ Sun Dec 3 08:54:50 2000 |+++ PATCHES Sun Dec 2 01:07:35 2001 -- - - - Schnapp - - - Unfazed, I continued. Configure (./configure --prefix=/usr --with-homespool=Mail/in) runs fine, make gives one warning, probably not yours: - - - Schnipp - - - pager.c: In function `format_line': pager.c:1118: warning: implicit declaration of function `wcwidth' - - - Schnapp - - - The linking fails, however: - - - Schnipp - - - mx.o: In function `trash_append': /home/hde/work/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/mx.c:825: undefined reference to `TrashPath' /home/hde/work/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/mx.c:838: undefined reference to `TrashPath' signature.o: In function `mutt_signature': /home/hde/work/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/signature.c:485: undefined reference to `SigDirectory' /home/hde/work/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/signature.c:491: undefined reference to `SigDirectory' - - - Schnapp - - - So is it the patching that went wrong? Thorsten -- Nichts ist schwerer und erfordert mehr Charakter, als sich in offenem Gegensatz zu seiner Zeit zu befinden und zu sagen: Nein! - Kurt Tucholsky
Re: binding and slow reaction
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:45:43PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote: * Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 04:49]: man ncurses ESCDELAY Specifies the total time, in milliseconds, for which ncurses will await a character sequence, e.g., a function key. The default value, 1000 milliseconds, is enough for most uses. However, it is made a vari- able to accommodate unusual applications. (it's hardcoded in slang, btw) OK, this is bordering on confusion (mine), but I decided to go with another key because I'm still checking out all of Mutt's features and would rather not FUBAR the Esc key combinations. I think you will save yourself a lot of grief with this decision :) -- Regards Cliff
Re: highlighting unread messages in the index
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 20:52]: | In the index, unread messages show up as bold (bright white). When I | select a message using the cursor, it shows up as a normal (light grey) | foreground with a blue background. Unfortunately, this is the same | color as a read message, so it is difficult to tell whether a message is | new without moving the cursor or looking at the flags at the left. Is | there any way I can make a highlighted unread message show up bold? | | Here's the relevant portion of my .muttrc: | | color normal defaultdefault | color index brightwhitedefault ~N | color index brightwhitedefault ~O | color indicator defaultblue This is currently not possible: indicator color has precedence over other coloring of messages. You're thinking of layered coloring, am I right? -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The end of wisdom is to dream high enough to lose the dream in the seeking of it. -William Faulkner msg21106/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
sync mailbox (was Re: a couple more questions)
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:31:54AM -0500, Paul Brannan wrote: No, I'm not trying to delete the message. What I want to do is send a message to myself and refresh the mailbox, so that I can see the message in my mailbox before the next scheduled mail check. (In other words, I want to be able to check my mail at an arbitrary time, rather than at every mail_check interval). I've been trying out setting delete=ask-no, and seeing if I can live with that. It seems bearable, but still a minor nuisance. However, if I respond no that I do not want to purge message, it seems that new messages do not show up in the inbox. As soon as I respond with a yes, the new messages show up. Is there any way to allow new messages to show up without purging messages from a mailbox? Paul
Re: Command line options
--- David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...and then Barney Wells said... % I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5. Wow, that's pretty old :-) % Also, the only version I could get working is the version that % I found on the skunkware CD-ROM. I take it, then, that you've downloaded some fairly current source (1.2.5, 1.3.x) and tried to compile it on your box... What sorts of problems did you have? The package looks like this, mutt-0.93.1-VOLS.tar After extracting the tar file I get this, VOL.000.000 VOL.000.000.files VOL.000.000.sum Then I run the custom command. In the software manager window I choose install new... At this point SCO Unix asks Where are the Media images I point it to /tmp Then it installs If I use any other distributions I do not get the VOL.000.000 files when they are extracted. If I don't get these type of files, I don't know any other way to install the program on SCO unix. BW __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com
Re: sync mailbox (was Re: a couple more questions)
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 21:34]: | Is there any way to allow new messages to show up without purging | messages from a mailbox? I'm not sure on this one, but what seemed to work for me, was trying to move the indicator below the last message. This seemd to force a check. But, again, I don't know this for sure... HTH, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) There is a definite parallel between shots of tequila and a woman's breasts. One is not enough and three are too many. msg21109/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: highlighting unread messages in the index
I accidentally hit 'r' instead of 'L', so the last two iterations here were in private. René suggested that I forward his response to the list. Is there a good way to prevent me from doing this again in the future? Paul - Forwarded message from René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:38:11 +0100 To: Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: highlighting unread messages in the index User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i * Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 21:24]: | On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:58:41PM +0100, René Clerc wrote: | This is currently not possible: indicator color has precedence over | other coloring of messages. You're thinking of layered coloring, am | I right? | | Some sort of layering would work (but would probably be overkill). If I | could give the indicator color a regular expression, that would probably | be enough. Well, you mention that you want indicated, new messages to have a certain color. Then the next thing is indicated tagged messages, indicated deleted messages, and so on... What I meant with layering was, that if you specify the indicator foreground color default, it would let the ~N foreground color through, so to speak. Btw, I have arrow_cursor set, then you've got no problem. But I'm probably the only one who has that set... I'll attach the color files of my mutt setup so you can see how my mutt colors are set (i.c.m. with the arrow-cursor)... Note that the list-colors file is only loaded when I'm in a mailinglist folder, for obvious reasons... HTH, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Birthdays are good for you. Statistics show that the people who have the most live the longest. -Rev. Larry Lorenzoni color hdrdefault green black color header brightyellowblack^from: color header brightyellowblack^subject: color quoted brightgreen black color quoted1 brightblue black color signature brightred black color indicator brightyellowblack color error brightred black color status brightwhite black color treebrightmagenta black color tilde brightmagenta black color bodybrightyellowblack (((ht|f)tps?)|mailto):(//)?[^\ \t]*|www\.[-a-z0-9.]+[^\ .,;\t] color bodybrightmagenta black[-a-z_0-9.+]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+ color attachment brightmagenta black source ~/.mutt/gpg-colors color index brightred black ~F color index brightgreen black ~T color index brightwhite black ~N color index brightblueblack ~D #EOF vim: ft=muttrc ts=2 color bodybrightgreen black ^gpg: Good signature from color bodybrightred black ^gpg: Bad signature from color bodybrightred black ^gpg: BAD signature from color bodybrightred black ^gpg: Note: This key has expired! color bodybrightyellowblack ^gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! color bodybrightyellowblack ^gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. color bodybrightyellowblack ^gpg: can't handle these multiple signatures color bodybrightyellowblack ^gpg: signature verification suppressed color bodybrightyellowblack ^gpg: invalid node with packet of type # vim: ft=muttrc ts=2 color index brightblueblack ~h 'In-Reply-To: .*clerc\.nl' color index brightblueblack ~x '.*clerc\.nl' ## everything from me jumps out color index brightyellow black ~P #source ~/.mutt/colors # vim: ft=muttrc ts=2 - End forwarded message -
newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands
OK guys and gals, I almost didn't post this for fear I missed something in the pound of documentation I've read g, but here goes. I'm using GnuPG and some recipients' clients do not have the capability to decipher PGP/MIME (see: Windows; TheBat!). * I've set up my procmail rules to add the appropriate headers so that mutt will allow me to decrypt messages and verfy signatures, regardless of their type. This is working perfectly. * I've managed to be able to clear sign outbound messages using: macro compose \Cp Fgpg --clearsign\ny PGP clearsign (by the way, binding and using ^s causes mutt to freeze, forcing me to kill it. Haven't the slightest clue why.) The signing works OK as well. Now, I keep seeing references to a pgp-menu function in various HOW-TO texts. According to my mutt, there is no such thing. I can't seem to find decent newbie intructions on how to encrypt messages without using PGP/MIME (or, prompting me for a choice, for example). I'm using vim for my editor, and I can't seem to figure out how to encrypt (Non-PGP/MIME) only the body of the message and be able to pick a recipient's key to encrypt to. I'm basically looking for tips/suggestions to make my life easier, if someone has any to offer. -- -Brian Clark
Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 12/05/2001: OK guys and gals, I almost didn't post this for fear I missed something in the pound of documentation I've read g, but here goes. I have nothing to say about this, but... * I've managed to be able to clear sign outbound messages using: macro compose \Cp Fgpg --clearsign\ny PGP clearsign (by the way, binding and using ^s causes mutt to freeze, forcing me to kill it. Haven't the slightest clue why.) ^s freezing your terminal is most llikely because your xterm is interpreting it as a flow-control thingie; ^q should start it back up again... (darren) -- The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. -- Ludwig Wittgenstein
Whoops: various shell commands
I left out part of my inquiry in the last post to the list..sorry. :-) When I do something like this: macro index F2 !echo 'Checking mail..';~/bin/getmail\n Check for new mail macro pager F2 !echo 'Checking mail..';~/bin/getmail\n Check for new mail where getmail's contents are: #!/bin/sh if [ -f /var/lock/LCK..ttyS1 ]; then if [ ! -f ~/.fetchmail.pid ]; then fetchmail -s fi fi .. I get the expected output, Checking mail.., but when it's done I get the Press any key to continue... -- which I get for any shell commands I run. Is there any way to only do that if there is an error? -- -Brian Clark
Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands
* darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 16:02]: * I've managed to be able to clear sign outbound messages using: macro compose \Cp Fgpg --clearsign\ny PGP clearsign (by the way, binding and using ^s causes mutt to freeze, forcing me to kill it. Haven't the slightest clue why.) ^s freezing your terminal is most llikely because your xterm is interpreting it as a flow-control thingie; ^q should start it back up again... And it does, thanks! -- -Brian Clark
Re: highlighting unread messages in the index
* Paul Brannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-12-2001 22:07]: | I accidentally hit 'r' instead of 'L', so the last two iterations here | were in private. René suggested that I forward his response to the | list. | | Is there a good way to prevent me from doing this again in the future? In theory it should be possible to rebind 'r' to list-reply when you're in some specific (mailinglist) folder. But you'll learn hitting 'L'... I usually press 'L' first, then realize I'm not replying to a mailing list but to a person in private, and then hit 'r' with a grin on my face ;) -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success. -James Bond, Tomorrow Never Dies msg21115/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sync mailbox (was Re: a couple more questions)
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:40:36PM +0100, René Clerc wrote: I'm not sure on this one, but what seemed to work for me, was trying to move the indicator below the last message. This seemd to force a check. But, again, I don't know this for sure... Hmm, that did not help. :) I think this has something to do with Mutt's interaction with IMAP mailboxes? Paul
how to have mutt show new mail on index ?
Hi All , I use mutt and fetchmail to retrive mail how ever if i leave mutt open it will not show new messeges on index unless i press a key i have check_mail=yes in my .muttrc but it does not seem to work any idea's ? Mute n output from mutt -v 1.2.5i (2000-07-28) System: FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE [using ncurses 5.1] Compile options: -DOMAIN -DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK -USE_FCNTL +USE_FLOCK +USE_IMAP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL +USE_POP +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_PGP -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS +ENABLE_NLS +COMPRESSED thanks barazani
Re: patch-1.3.23.cd.edit_threads-6[.CYA] not working
Hi Thorsten, I have just patched in all three of your changes in 1.3.24i. While patching, I got one error each (with different line numbers): - - - Schnipp - - - can't find file to patch at input line 715 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |--- PATCHES~ Sun Dec 3 08:54:50 2000 |+++ PATCHES Sun Dec 2 01:07:35 2001 -- - - - Schnapp - - - Weird. How did you apply the patches? Did you, as the error message suggest, use the right -p option? From the good directory? Sample of what you should have done: $ wget http://cedricduval.free.fr/download/patch-1.3.24.cd.edit_threads.8 $ tar xvzf mutt-1.3.24i.tar.gz $ cd mutt-1.3.24 $ patch -p1 ../patch-1.3.24.cd.edit_threads.8 patching file `thread.c' patching file `OPS' patching file `copy.c' patching file `curs_main.c' patching file `doc/manual.sgml.head' patching file `functions.h' patching file `mutt.h' patching file `mx.c' patching file `pager.c' patching file `parse.c' patching file `protos.h' patching file `recvcmd.c' patching file `send.c' patching file `PATCHES' So is it the patching that went wrong? I suspect you applied the patches at the wrong place, because other peoples have had no problem. If not, maybe we should continue off-list to see what's wrong. Cheers, -- Cedric
Re: highlighting unread messages in the index
* Paul Brannan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I accidentally hit 'r' instead of 'L', so the last two iterations here were in private. René suggested that I forward his response to the list. Is there a good way to prevent me from doing this again in the future? Maybe rebind 'r' to list-reply im ml folders or so. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
Mutt finding new mail
Hi there, folks! I have a wondering. How does mutt checks for new mail? I mean, when I press cret, how does it knows which folder have new mails, and which one does not? That's all ;) Take care! -- Cleber S. Mori Monitor Lab Linux 2o Ano - Bacharelado em Ciências da Computação ICMC - Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação USP - Universidade de São Paulo - São Carlos HPage: http://grad.icmc.sc.usp.br/~cleber/ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ/UIN:1409389
Re: Mutt finding new mail
* Cleber S. Mori [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-12-2001 00:04]: | How does mutt checks for new mail? | I mean, when I press cret, how does it knows which folder have new mails, | and which one does not? Check the mailboxes directive: here you specify which mailboxes receive mail. The order you specify them in, determines which one with new mail shows up first. HTH, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Too clever is dumb. -Ogden Nash msg21121/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mutt finding new mail
Ren? Clerc wrote: * Cleber S. Mori [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-12-2001 00:04]: How does mutt checks for new mail? I mean, when I press cret, how does it knows which folder have new mails, and which one does not? Check the mailboxes directive: here you specify which mailboxes receive mail. The order you specify them in, determines which one with new mail shows up first. well i think the question was how mutt knows which folders have new mail. for mbox folders it uses the modification time (mtime i think, but i always get that crap mixed up) to see when the file was last modified. with maildir i assume it just checks to see if there are messages in folder/new/ but i could be wrong there. -- William Yardley System Administrator, Newdream Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/gpg.asc
(New mails) Where is the problem origin?
Hi all! It's me again, I'm feeling like disturbing you guys, sorry :) I'm having a problem with mutt finding new mails, even after all the mailboxes var and etc. set, Mutt still don't find folders with new mails. I found the problem, but not the problem origin. What is happening is that when new mail comes, the mail file (Separeted via procmail) is touched in atime and ctime (mtime?), while the expected behaviour is that only the ctime is modifyed. This way, mutt can look and find wich file have a mtime newer than atime. So, when I get new mails, mutt don't see that the folder have new mails. When I do touch -m /home/cleber/Mail/Lists/Mutt (which is the mutt list file), mutt DOES tell me that a new mail is in there, so the configuration is correct. The problem is that *something* is touching the file. Any one has had this problem? I thought that procmail was doing something wrong, and I upgraded-it (v3.22), but the problem persists. Any one, have a clue? -- Cleber S. Mori Monitor Lab Linux 2o Ano - Bacharelado em Ciências da Computação ICMC - Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação USP - Universidade de São Paulo - São Carlos HPage: http://grad.icmc.sc.usp.br/~cleber/ E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ/UIN:1409389
Re: binding and slow reaction
Brian -- ...and then Brian Clark said... % * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 08:19]: % % In either case, you wouldn't need the next-unread in your macro, so I % suspect that you have resolve=no. % % OK, I checked out my .muttrc and I do have resolve unset. So there's my % whole problem with the move-to-the-next-message thing. There ya go :-) % % % Which is basically what I was trying to do (Del, Esc to close, then % % arrow down). % % Did you specifically want to not be back in the pager? That looks like % the factor that will decide how you might rewrite. % % Yep, I wanted to exit the pager. That is, for clarity, that you wanted to exit the pager for the current message, delete it, go to the next unread, and not read it immediately, right? After all, as I'm reading through a thread and not sure that I'll delete the whole thing, I just use 'd' from the pager to delete the message and read the next one; I don't spend any time back in the index. Of course, you might want to exit, delete, move, and not enter, but if you'd prefer the behavior above you can dispense with the macro entirely. % % HTH HAND % % Thanks, David Sure thing! % % -- % -Brian Clark :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21127/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
Volker -- ...and then Volker Moell said... % David T-G wrote: % % I don't get it, though. Those variables reference data from the replied % mail. What on earth do you expect to have in them when you're starting % a new mail? % % In replied messages it's the realname part in From:, so now I want the % realname part in To: (prompted after typing m). Is this so % illogical? Nothing is ever illogical once the point of view is understood -- but I don't yet understand your point of view :-) So you want to trap what's in To: in either case (in a reply, where we might also think of it as originating-From:, and in a new message). I still don't see how you would use such data. What am I missing? % % Seeya, % % -volker % % -- % http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ % % 98% of all statistics are useless. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21128/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Command line options
Barney -- ...and then Barney Wells said... % % --- David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % % ...and then Barney Wells said... % % I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5. ... % % Also, the only version I could get working is the version that % % I found on the skunkware CD-ROM. % % I take it, then, that you've downloaded some fairly current source % (1.2.5, 1.3.x) and tried to compile it on your box... What sorts % of % problems did you have? % % The package looks like this, % mutt-0.93.1-VOLS.tar % After extracting the tar file I get this, % VOL.000.000 % VOL.000.000.files % VOL.000.000.sum Interesting. Of course, I haven't touched SCO in quite a few years... % Then I run the custom command. % In the software manager window I choose install new... % At this point SCO Unix asks Where are the Media images % I point it to /tmp % Then it installs Hokay. % If I use any other distributions I do not % get the VOL.000.000 files when they are extracted. If I Right; I've never seen 'em. % don't get these type of files, I don't know any other way to % install the program on SCO unix. Do you have a compiler, either stock or GNU, or is SCO one of those horribly stricken *NIXes that has absolutely no compiling support? % % BW :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21129/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Something changed in new Mutt
Hello, I installed the new Mutt yesterday Mutt 1.3.24i (2001-11-29) Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 2.4.13FB (i686) [using ncurses 5.2] Compile options: -DOMAIN +DEBUG -HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK -DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK -USE_POP -USE_IMAP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL -USE_SASL +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +HAVE_PGP -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET ++HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_GETSID -HAVE_GETADDRINFO ISPELL=/usr/bin/ispell SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail MAILPATH=/var/mail PKGDATADIR=/usr/local/share/mutt SYSCONFDIR=/usr/local/etc EXECSHELL=/bin/sh -MIXMASTER And I know there are new features etc (still not quite sure I understand the ? in threads..) But something kept bothering me about the index display, it didn't look the same. And it just hit me what it was. I have the following in my aliases: alias mutt Mutt List [EMAIL PROTECTED] In my index list i used to see Mutt List 162 L Dec 05 To Mutt List( 4: 4) matching in hooks Now I see 162 L Dec 05 To mutt-users ( 4: 4) matching in hooks ? -- Regards Cliff
Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands
Brian -- ...and then Brian Clark said... % OK guys and gals, I almost didn't post this for fear I missed something % in the pound of documentation I've read g, but here goes. At least you've read some. We all thank you :-) % % I'm using GnuPG and some recipients' clients do not have the capability % to decipher PGP/MIME (see: Windows; TheBat!). ultimate_flame_warScrew 'em!/ultimate_flame_war % % * I've set up my procmail rules to add the appropriate headers so that % mutt will allow me to decrypt messages and verfy signatures, % regardless of their type. This is working perfectly. Great! I find that more convenient than the new esc-P function, lovely though it is to have that (for when I go back to my local copy of a message that I sent out to such a user). % % * I've managed to be able to clear sign outbound messages using: % macro compose \Cp Fgpg --clearsign\ny PGP clearsign % (by the way, binding and using ^s causes mutt to freeze, forcing me % to kill it. Haven't the slightest clue why.) % The signing works OK as well. Ick. That is one way to do it, and is unfortunately necessary when using a charset other than us-ascii and perhaps when attaching a file (but that bit is untested), but doing it within mutt would be so much nicer. I have had wonderful success with the stock $pgp_create_traditional and the patch-supplied $pgp_outlook_compat settings; when both are yes, even LookOut! users can read and reply to my signed mail. % % Now, I keep seeing references to a pgp-menu function in various HOW-TO % texts. According to my mutt, there is no such thing. I can't seem to % find decent newbie intructions on how to encrypt messages without using % PGP/MIME (or, prompting me for a choice, for example). You initiate a message, supply your recipient and subject information, edit it, and finish your composition. You are then dropped into the compose menu, where you can send, edit, attach, or make pgp changes (or execute your macro from above). When you hit 'p' from there, you enter the pgp menu; you can, IIRC, sign, sign as, encrypt, both, or forget it and send cleartext. % % I'm using vim for my editor, and I can't seem to figure out how to % encrypt (Non-PGP/MIME) only the body of the message and be able to % pick a recipient's key to encrypt to. I'd do it from mutt rather than vim; mutt knows how to pass the recipient info off. % % I'm basically looking for tips/suggestions to make my life easier, % if someone has any to offer. You might try the archives, but signing and encryption come up a lot. I haven't checked, but a query for signing outlook might be sufficient. % % -- % -Brian Clark HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21131/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Whoops: various shell commands
Brian -- ...and then Brian Clark said... % I left out part of my inquiry in the last post to the list..sorry. :-) No problem; threads shouldn't be tied together anyway. % % When I do something like this: % ... % .. I get the expected output, Checking mail.., but when it's done I % get the Press any key to continue... -- which I get for any shell % commands I run. Right. % % Is there any way to only do that if there is an error? RTFM for $wait_key :-) % % -- % -Brian Clark HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21132/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * I've managed to be able to clear sign outbound messages using: macro compose \Cp Fgpg --clearsign\ny PGP clearsign (by the way, binding and using ^s causes mutt to freeze, forcing me to kill it. Haven't the slightest clue why.) The signing works OK as well. You're most likely enabling scroll-lock for your terminal when you press C-s. Try hitting C-q to make it go away. Use something other than C-s, or disable C-s as the stop char: stty -a shows: speed 38400 baud; rows 57; columns 84; line = 0; intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = undef; eol2 = undef; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R; ... try: $ stty stop That fixes it for me, although that may not be the right way to do it. HTH, -- Josh Huber | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Re: Whoops: various shell commands
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 21:35]: % % Is there any way to only do that if there is an error? RTFM for $wait_key :-) Good grief! Right there under my nose. :-) It's great that you can do so much customization, but it sure plays tricks on your lookup abilities. g Thanks! -- -Brian Clark
Re: $attribution/$post_indent_string for new mail
Hi, On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether: Thorsten Haude wrote: I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you want. Thanks, but I use emacs. [-- snip --] And the reason my $EDITOR can't do it completely is to do the %n thing (like in $attribution). Another reason to think that mutt can help me. Just edit your headers, and put in a macro to do this in your editor. It's quite easy under Vim (*grin*) : :2co /^$/ | :s/.*\:\ // | :s/.*// This is assuming you want to put the name in right under the headers. I'm sure something similar should be possible for Emacs. pv. -- Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]What, me worry ? http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/Don't Panic ! -- msg21135/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: newbie: gpg confusion, various shell commands
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Dec 05. 2001 21:33]: % I'm using GnuPG and some recipients' clients do not have the capability % to decipher PGP/MIME (see: Windows; TheBat!). ultimate_flame_warScrew 'em!/ultimate_flame_war Flamewars aside, if you ever have to use Windows, TheBat! is actually an exceptional MUA. (unless one wanted to use Mutt with Cygwin(sp?).) % * I've managed to be able to clear sign outbound messages using: % macro compose \Cp Fgpg --clearsign\ny PGP clearsign % (by the way, binding and using ^s causes mutt to freeze, forcing me % to kill it. Haven't the slightest clue why.) % The signing works OK as well. Ick. That is one way to do it, and is unfortunately necessary when using a charset other than us-ascii and perhaps when attaching a file (but that bit is untested), but doing it within mutt would be so much nicer. I was reeeally hoping the HOW-TO's were going to say, oh yeah, that's eeeasy. :-) The manual says clear signing is seriously depreciated, but there are a ton of people out there unfamiliar with PGP/MIME. That makes me wonder why the author(s) of Mutt didn't go ahead and add in support for clear signing that's on par with its PGP/MIME ease of use. I have had wonderful success with the stock $pgp_create_traditional and the patch-supplied $pgp_outlook_compat settings; when both are yes, even LookOut! users can read and reply to my signed mail. I'd have to figure out how to patch a source deb and rebuild it. I've never done that before, but.. % Now, I keep seeing references to a pgp-menu function in various HOW-TO % texts. According to my mutt, there is no such thing. I can't seem to % find decent newbie intructions on how to encrypt messages without using % PGP/MIME (or, prompting me for a choice, for example). You initiate a message, supply your recipient and subject information, edit it, and finish your composition. You are then dropped into the compose menu, where you can send, edit, attach, or make pgp changes OK, when you say make pgp changes, what are you referring to? In the PGP field, every time I send, I see PGP: Clear but it _never_ prompts me for anything, and the mail is never sent signed. I expected it not to be signed, however, because I have it set not to sign by default in my dot files. Is there something wrong with my set-up if it's displaying PGP: Clear every time I'm dropped to the compose menu (and of course not signing it)? (or execute your macro from above). When you hit 'p' from there, you enter the pgp menu; you can, IIRC, sign, sign as, encrypt, both, or forget it and send cleartext. Hitting p from the compose menu is what I wasn't getting. LOL If I think about it for a while, I realize how silly that is for me to overlook that. % I'm using vim for my editor, and I can't seem to figure out how to % encrypt (Non-PGP/MIME) only the body of the message and be able to % pick a recipient's key to encrypt to. I'd do it from mutt rather than vim; mutt knows how to pass the recipient info off. Yep, but hittin p from the compose menu is going to drop back to PGP/MIME, AFAIK, right? % I'm basically looking for tips/suggestions to make my life easier, % if someone has any to offer. You might try the archives, but signing and encryption come up a lot. I haven't checked, but a query for signing outlook might be sufficient. And off I go.. (again) ;-) Thanks again, David. -- -Brian Clark
Re: Script to rebuild quotes
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
Initial perl version at:
http://freak.aagh.net/code/quotefix.pl
Does this grok ^http: and stuff ? Doesn't seem to do it here. So, what
I did was, I converted the regexp it looks for into the $quote_regexp in
my .muttrc, with a few changes.
snip
while ($line =~ /^(--)|^([ \t]*[(A-Z){0,2}|(a-z){0,6}]+)|^([ \t\]*[|}%])+/
/snip
Another thing is, the Super-quotes, like ^ AA, always seem to end
in , and not in [|}%], etc. This could possible be changed by some
sadistic people, but for now, I've omitted everything but .
Also, this is something that comes up often in display filtering :
When stripping of trailing white-spaces, don't strip off the white-space
after the sig-dashes. Or, better yet, do this, before printing $line :
$line =~ s/^--$/-- /;
Anyway, great work ! But, unfortunately, the quest for the perfect
quote_regexp seems never-ending :-(
pv.
--
Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]What, me worry ?
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/Don't Panic !
--
msg21140/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Script to rebuild quotes
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
Initial perl version at:
http://freak.aagh.net/code/quotefix.pl
Does this grok ^http: and stuff ? Doesn't seem to do it here.
It should do, the ruby one certainly seems to, but the Perl version's
poorly tested.
You'll note the:
$1.$' !~ /^(From|(http|mailto|ftp|telnet|gopher|scp|rsync):|[:;]-?\))/)
The ^ is probably tripping it up - maybe a \s* is needed.
So, what I did was, I converted the regexp it looks for into the
$quote_regexp in my .muttrc, with a few changes.
snip while ($line =~ /^(--)|^([ \t]*[(A-Z){0,2}|(a-z){0,6}]+)|^([
\t\]*[|}%])+/ /snip
I'll see what I can rip out of that, but don't forget FO
Another thing is, the Super-quotes, like ^ AA, always seem to end
in , and not in [|}%], etc. This could possible be changed by
some sadistic people, but for now, I've omitted everything but .
Yeah, something worth exploiting, probably.
Also, this is something that comes up often in display filtering :
When stripping of trailing white-spaces, don't strip off the
white-space after the sig-dashes. Or, better yet, do this, before
printing $line :
$line =~ s/^--$/-- /;
It's made with filtering individual blocks in mind, because this is how
I format mail - I hit F2 to fix the quotes and F3 to run it through par,
but I'll fix this.
Anyway, great work ! But, unfortunately, the quest for the perfect
quote_regexp seems never-ending :-(
47 downloads so far - 30 for the quick perl version and 17 for the
original tested Ruby :)
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
Re: patch-1.3.23.cd.edit_threads-6[.CYA] not working
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 07:19:28AM, Cedric Duval wrote: You'll find the patch updated for the new threading implementation at http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/ Why doesn't it work with Maildir ? Cedric ---end quoted text--- binny -- J'aimerais savoir quels sont les différences majeurs entre FreeBSD, OpenBSD et NetBSD ? man diff -- Unknown °v° Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED] _o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net
