Re: Working with mbox
Alas! David T-G spake thus: % The .muttrc is fairly robust. You can put almost any shell command into % backticks (``), and it will be as though the output of that command is % actually in the .muttrc file. This is why mutt is so much better than % pine :) Um, yeah; that's the *only* reason. Sre... *grin* Well, sure there are a few hundred more, but that's one of the big ones (for me, anyway). I love scripting stuff into my .muttrc :) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The depressing thing about tennis is that no matter how good I get, I'll never be as good as a wall. -- Mitch Hedberg msg22371/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Add header for gpg key location
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus: Hi aqain. Someone mentioned to me that you could add a header to mails giving the location of your gpg public key. How is this done, or are there some useful docs on the topic? I figure I just create a page from the export-key func on my site and then point people to it? You could do that with my_hdr (which is how I did the X-* headers on this email), but I think it is much better to just submit your key to a few popular keyservers for everybody else to download automatically :) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso msg22372/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: next/prev unread
Alas! David T-G spake thus: % I wonder who it's actually encrypted to... Herself, of course. She's probably one of those people who goes around talking to herself and so particular about her conversations that she doesn't even want anyone to listen in ;-) I get it; trying to sign it with her key and accidentally encrypting it with her key. Lets not bug her too much; we all make mistakes. ;) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sex is hereditary. If your parents never had it, chances are you won't, either. -- Joseph Fischer msg22373/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: how make From: header dependent on recipient?
Alas! Tom Jones spake thus: (2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc, etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header to that. Otherwise set the From: value to a default value. Look into send-hooks. The Fine Manual has everything you need to know. -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Minnesota Atty. Gen. Mike Hatch said he got about 300 of those [letters]. It's sleazy, he said. This is not a company that appears to be bothered by ethical boundaries. -- Talking about Microsoft's fake grass root (aka astroturfing) letters to the Atty. Gen. msg22374/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Color mails which are a reply to a mail from me?
At 20:34 -0500 05 Jan 2002, parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Aaron Schrab thusly... color index red default %~P aaron, i have been using similar syntax for the same purpose since mutt v1.2.something (less than 1.2.4 for sure) created from freebsd ports, now on v1.3.25i, w/o any problems. syntax is... color index red default ~P ^- notice the missing '%' ...so how does the patch figure in? It adds support for the % modifier, which causes the rest of the match operator to match against the parent of the message (the message that it was in reply to), rather than the message itself. So while ~P matches messages that you wrote yourself, %~P matches messages that are replies to messages that you wrote. Although that would only work if your message was in the same mailbox. i didn't understand the above statement. when you say message(s) in the same mailbox, what do you mean by it? Since mutt doesn't keep information about messages not in the current mailbox, the parent of a message needs to be in the current mailbox in order to match against it. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ In general, if you think something isn't in Perl, try it out, because it usually is. :-)--Larry Wall msg22375/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Working with mbox
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:30:35AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus: The ways that script works is by outputting the muttrc to a tempory file, the name of which is outputted for source, but what you can do is just to put: `~/bin/do-whatever.sh` In the muttrc and mutt will interpret the output of the shell script without the need of tempory files. Nope, that was the first thing I tried, didn't work. I had to modify the script to output the mbox hooks to a temp file, and then output the tempfile's name to stdout, which could then be sourced in the .muttrc. Strange, I seemed to work fine with me when I tried `echo push ?` so that mutt would always popup the help screen. -- Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg22377/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp hook patches
Dale, et al -- ...and then Dale Woolridge said... % % David noted that my recent pgp-hook extension patch conflicts with Hey, I'm famous! *grin* % Bardur Arantsson's pgp-hook-extension patch. Borrowing Bardur's % idea and following David's suggestion, I have implemented the same % idea following the existing hook model more closely. You can find % the new patch at http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/. Bardur's patch Thanks a bunch! I'm [finally] trying it out in the cocktail now. % extended pgp-hook from % pgp-hook pattern keyID % to % pgp-hook pattern keyID_1 [, keyID_2] ... % % My patch, aside from the pgp_confirmhook/pgp_autokeyselect support, % now allows multiple pgp-hook's with the same pattern, e.g.: % pgp-hook pattern keyID_1 % pgp-hook pattern keyID_2 % ... So does your patch include Bardur's functionality and then go farther, or do the two complement each other? % -- % -Dale :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg22378/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
News reader that's good with mutt?
Hi everyone. I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would compliment mutt nicely. I've just been looking at nn but it was way over my head to setup properly. Thanks -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg22379/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
Nick -- ...and then Nick Wilson said... % % Hi everyone. Hello again! % I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would % compliment mutt nicely. Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that the keybindings are similar. Others might say mutt, since there are some mutt NNTP patches out there. % I've just been looking at nn but it was way over my head to setup % properly. Well, at least you'd know mutt :-) % % Thanks % -- % % Nick Wilson % % Tel: +45 3325 0688 % Fax: +45 3325 0677 % Web: www.explodingnet.com HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg22380/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 12:29]: Nick -- ...and then Nick Wilson said... % % Hi everyone. Hello again! % I just wanted to know if there were any news readers that would % compliment mutt nicely. Well, some might say slrn, since I hear that the keybindings are similar. Others might say mutt, since there are some mutt NNTP patches out there. % I've just been looking at nn but it was way over my head to setup % properly. Well, at least you'd know mutt :-) % % Thanks % -- % % Nick Wilson % % Tel:+45 3325 0688 % Fax:+45 3325 0677 % Web:www.explodingnet.com HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! Thanks David, I'll look into mutt. Now I'm getting the hang of it I'm completely addicted! Cheers -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg22381/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
Hi, * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]: You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even better ;-) Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard to read for no good reasons. Thorsten -- Question Authority!
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
Thorsten -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % % Hi, % % * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]: % You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even % better ;-) % Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard % to read for no good reasons. Absolutely. Couldn't agree with you more. % % Thorsten % -- % Question Authority! :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg22384/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]: Hi, * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]: You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even better ;-) Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard to read for no good reasons. So does that mean you are for 'replying in context' or against? I couldn't understand your sentence. -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg22385/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: multipart/alternative and text/html
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:21:25PM +0700, budsz wrote: How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be formatted worse. If you want to make easy pls install metamail, copy mailcap to home directory. I don't understand how that applies to my problem... I already have metamail installed on my system, and my .mailcap file IS in my home directory. BTW, why'd you CC your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Patch for mutt with Mixmaster 2.9beta32
Hi.
When I was setting up Mixmaster with mutt, I didn't find the
recommended version of Mixmaster, so I tried Mixmaster 2.9beta32. It
didn't quite work, but I figured out it was because Mixmaster now
wanted commas between the remailers in the command line.
I haven't bothered researching when this changed. And I suppose this
could be checked at compile time. But autoconf co are not quite my
friends yet.
So, FWIW, attached is a patch that might be the right thing for you if
you have a newer version of Mixmaster and mutt is acting up.
--
Johan Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://johan.nforced.com/
GnuPG public key id: 0x6415B9F7 (1024 bits)
Key fingerprint: CA6F 0720 B0D1 2FBA 74EB 348C 3110 6415 B9F7
diff -u mutt-1.3.22.orig/remailer.c mutt-1.3.22/remailer.c
--- mutt-1.3.22.orig/remailer.c Thu Apr 26 15:15:20 2001
+++ mutt-1.3.22/remailer.c Sat Dec 8 18:27:09 2001
@@ -751,12 +751,13 @@
int i;
snprintf (cmd, sizeof (cmd), cat %s | %s -m -l, tempfile, Mixmaster);
- for (; chain; chain = chain-next)
+ for (i=0; chain; chain = chain-next)
{
strfcpy (tmp, cmd, sizeof (tmp));
-snprintf (cmd, sizeof (cmd), %s %s, tmp, (char *) chain-data);
+snprintf (cmd, sizeof (cmd), %s%s%s, tmp, i++ ? , : ,
+ (char *) chain-data);
}
-
+
if (!option (OPTNOCURSES))
mutt_endwin (NULL);
msg22388/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
Moin, * Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 14:26]: * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]: * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]: You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even better ;-) Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard to read for no good reasons. So does that mean you are for 'replying in context' or against? I couldn't understand your sentence. Sorry to confuse you, I was only referring to an old quarrel with David. IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and write your answer in each context. Thorsten -- There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its production and distribution are handed over to criminals.
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
* Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 15:40]: Moin, * Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 14:26]: * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]: * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]: You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even better ;-) Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard to read for no good reasons. So does that mean you are for 'replying in context' or against? I couldn't understand your sentence. Sorry to confuse you, I was only referring to an old quarrel with David. IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and write your answer in each context. Thorsten -- There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its production and distribution are handed over to criminals. Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) I take it that this topic is much debated? Or do I constitute a minority? :) -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg22390/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Patch for mutt with Mixmaster 2.9beta32
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002, Ken Wahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought the issue with the newer versions of Mixmaster was that they didn't accept the -T switch to view remailer lists? 2 nights ago I spent hours on the mutt-users mail archive reading anything that had to do with Mixmaster. Mix-2.9beta32 comes with the -T switch. I did manage to find an old redhat rpm of mixmaster 2.04 that I was able to install on RH 7.1 . It works by itself fine. It fails in mutt. Mutt is able to bring up the Mix menu and let me choose remailers but when I send I can see the shell output a lot of garbage ( Error repeatedly ) and the message doesn't get sent. And yes I compiled mutt with the --with-mixmaster=/usr/lib/mixmaster configuration switch. This is exactly the symptom I experienced. Try choosing only one remailer. If I remember correctly, that worked even before I patched mutt. 2 questions: Is your patch the only patch that you know of that is needed to run newer versions of mixmaster? I dare only speak about Mix-2.9beta32. It works perfectly after applying only this patch. Do you think it will work with 1.3.25i? I just had a look at the 1.3.25i source. My patch won't apply. But it appears as if this problem is already fixed. If you're using 1.3.25i and Mixmaster still doesn't work, something else must be wrong. There's some new dependencies in 1.3.25i though, so I haven't tried compiling it myself yet. I might be wrong about this. And finally, a big thanks for coding the patch. It seemed that interest in Mixmaster had completely died out. No problem. Sorry I didn't send it to the list earlier so you had to waste all those hours reading the archives =) I personally use mutt because of its gpg and mix support, so there's still some interest -- Johan Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://johan.nforced.com/ GnuPG public key id: 0x6415B9F7 (1024 bits) Key fingerprint: CA6F 0720 B0D1 2FBA 74EB 348C 3110 6415 B9F7 msg22391/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
* Morten Liebach [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 16:19]: On 2002-01-06 15:45:11 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and write your answer in each context. The above *is* the gospel WRT answering emails! :-) There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its production and distribution are handed over to criminals. Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) For example I first thought you were commenting on Thorsten's quite nice .sig, but you were not, this is confusing IMHO. I take it that this topic is much debated? Yes! Or do I constitute a minority? :) Yes! (I hope ;-) Have a nice day Morten I'll take it under consideration! -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg22393/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 03:45:11PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote: * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 15:40]: Moin, * Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 14:26]: * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020106 14:22]: * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 12:55]: You should try replying in context instead of at the bottom; it's even better ;-) Yeah, and we like totally unlike anything that would made mails hard to read for no good reasons. So does that mean you are for 'replying in context' or against? I couldn't understand your sentence. Sorry to confuse you, I was only referring to an old quarrel with David. IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and write your answer in each context. Thorsten -- There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its production and distribution are handed over to criminals. Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) I take it that this topic is much debated? Or do I constitute a minority? :) Its also good if people don't quote signatures as people names are given in the attrib lines. -- Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg22394/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
tagging in browser
/usr/local/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-6.html says: %t * if the file is tagged, blank otherwise when I press '?' in the browser, I see this: t tag-entry tag the current entry but it doesn't work: (hit 't') -- Mutt: Mailboxes [11] Tagging is not supported. This is mutt-1.3.23i. -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 7:21PM up 11 days, 5:59, 17 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
Re: News reader that's good with mutt?
Moin, * Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-06 15:45]: Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) Let's take this example: - - - Schnipp - - - There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its production and distribution are handed over to criminals. Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) - - - Schnapp - - - Huh? What about this: - - - Schnipp - - - IMHO you should make reasonable bits out of the mail you answer and write your answer in each context. Problem is that I find that format more confusing and prefer to only quote if the point I refer to _really_ needs it. (like it's a really long mail) - - - Schnapp - - - I like the second more. Thorsten -- He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. - Thomas Jefferson
Re: Searching through headers? (Message-ID)
* Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 15:04]: Hello, I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header, but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how? Thanks, Carlos. http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2 ~h EXPR messages which contain EXPR in the message header ~i ID message which match ID in the ``Message-ID'' field -- Eunjea [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kldp.org/~eunjea/ GnuPG fingerprint: 08C9 2D3F 91B2 D395 2EFF 4C33 544C 321C E194 91CF msg22401/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
1.3.25 builds with S-LANG - PuTTy colors now munged
I finally got 1.3.25 built on a FreeBSD 4.4 box. I had previously been running 1.3.22. After installing from the port, colors are no longer working properly using Putty. By not working I mean that it seems the foreground and background colors are reversed in some cases. Text that was previously green on a default background is now black on a green background. The default background does not seem to show through. In other cases, the text color is completely different from those defined in my .muttrc. No other changes were made that I'm aware of, so I started poking around in the makefile. I noticed that during the install that slang was also installed, which I'd not seen before. The Makefile says... # In general you can choose between using the SLANG port (which is really # recommended and is now the default) and ncurses (WITH_MUTT_NCURSES). If you # don't want to use SLANG define WITHOUT_MUTT_SLANG. Now, before I go around messing with trying to go back to using ncurses, I'd like to know if anyone knows if there's a way to fix the color issue while still using slang, since that seems to now be recommended. I know nothing about curses or S-LANG btw, so I'm pretty much flying blind here. -- Jack Baty Fusionary Media - http://www.fusionary.com/
Re: multipart/alternative and text/html
Philip -- ...and then Philip Mak said... % % How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT % making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message % was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be % formatted worse. Look into section 5.5 of the manual and put something like auto_view text/html # autoview of HTML after dump from lynx (see .mailcap) alternative_order text/plain text/enriched text/html # I'd prefer simple text, though; got some? into your muttrc file. % % This is my .mailcap for text/html: % % text/html; lynx %s; nametemplate=%s.html % text/html; lynx -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput % % Also, should I look into using w3m or links instead of lynx? I heard % that some people (prefer to?) use those. I hear that both are good, but have been too lazy to check them out :-) :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg22404/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 1.3.25 builds with S-LANG - PuTTy colors now munged
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:18:19PM -0500, Jack Baty wrote: Now, before I go around messing with trying to go back to using ncurses, I'd like to know if anyone knows if there's a way to fix the color issue while still using slang, since that seems to now be recommended. I know nothing not recommended. slang users just tend to be a lot louder (and there are more slang users than developers...) -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Re: multipart/alternative and text/html
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:23:36PM -0500, David T-G wrote: | Philip -- | | ...and then Philip Mak said... | % | % How can I make mutt able to display text/html attachments inline, WITHOUT | % making it pick text/html (instead of text/plain) when the original message | % was sent as multipart/alternative? I find the text/html versions to be | % formatted worse. | | Look into section 5.5 of the manual and put something like | | auto_view text/html # autoview of HTML after dump |from lynx (see .mailcap) | alternative_order text/plain text/enriched text/html# I'd prefer simple |text, though; got some? | | into your muttrc file. | | | % | % This is my .mailcap for text/html: | % | % text/html; lynx %s; nametemplate=%s.html | % text/html; lynx -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput | % | % Also, should I look into using w3m or links instead of lynx? I heard | % that some people (prefer to?) use those. | | I hear that both are good, but have been too lazy to check them out :-) | | | :-D | -- | David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles | (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie | (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! | Hi, Can I use the same config with w3m? Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira pt-quorum.com /* PGP Public Key: http://www.pt-quorum.com/pgp/nunoteixeira.asc Key fingerprint: 8C2C B364 D4DC 0C92 56F5 CE6F 8F07 720A 63A0 4FC7 */
Re: how make From: header dependent on recipient?
* Tom Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 00:53]: (2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc, etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header to that. Otherwise set the From: value to a default value. I think you can use message-hook with ~h pattern. something like this: message-hook '~h ^To:.*blah@blah\.org' \ 'my_hdr From: someone nobody@localhost' or message-hook ~p 'my_hdr From: someone nobody@localhost' -- Eunjea [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kldp.org/~eunjea/ GnuPG fingerprint: 08C9 2D3F 91B2 D395 2EFF 4C33 544C 321C E194 91CF msg22407/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp hook patches
On 6-Jan-2002 06:12 David T-G wrote: | | So does your patch include Bardur's functionality and then go farther, or | do the two complement each other? My patch should work as a replacement as it includes all the functionality of Bardur's patch, albeit with slightly different syntax. The implementation is altogether different too. -- -Dale msg22408/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: multipart/alternative and text/html
* Nuno Teixeira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-06 22:06]: Can I use the same config with w3m? Yes, you can. This is my mailcap entry: #text/html; w3m %s; nametemplate=%s.html text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput -- Eunjea [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kldp.org/~eunjea/ GnuPG fingerprint: 08C9 2D3F 91B2 D395 2EFF 4C33 544C 321C E194 91CF msg22409/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sentmail and gpg
On Samstag, 05. Jan. 2002 at 23:22:42, David Clarke wrote: On Sat, 05 Jan 2002, Markus Boelter wrote: How is it possible to store the sent-mail in sent-mail-folder (and enrypt it with my own key)? Howdy, Simply done with the encrypt-to option for gnupg. Just add encrypt-to your-keyid to your ~/.gnupg/options, where you replace your-keyid with the id of your public key and it will encrypt everything with your key as well as the recipients. That way you can read it. Hello David, must I put my pub key-id or my sub key-id in ~/.gnupg/options? I'm not working much with gpg, so I don't no it. I make $gpg --list-keys walfinger and get 2 lines. Must I take the number of the first or the second line? Thx in advance Michael -- I have downloaded ash_0.3.8-13_i386.deb. How can I proceed to install this package? P.S. My machine: OS: Windows Advanced Server 2000 (Alan Wu on debian-user) msg22410/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Mutt, SuSE Gnupg
Hi List, I am currently using: Mutt 1.3.22.1i Vim 6.0av SuSE 7.1 Gnupg 1.0.6 The Problem: When emailing, after I chose b(oth) sign/encrypt I type y to mail, enter my passphrase and in konsole I get the following: gpg: A89A2371--: skipped: public key not found. Press any key to continue. If I then go to my outbox and check the mail I had just sent, this is all that is in the body: [--PGP output follows (current time, etc)--] [--Error: could not create a pgp subprocess!--] What steps I have taken to resolve the problem: 1. Read the FAQ at gnupg.org (which fixed a second problem I was having). 2. Multiple google searches for related postings. 3. Related man pages (mutt and gpg) 4. Justins' site (codesorcery.net) 5. www.suse.de/en Using Mutt and gpg for email (for older versions of mutt and gpg though I tried it as well, didn't work) 6. Posted to suse list. Received one response referring me to kmail. 7. Posted to gnugp-users list. Received no response. I created the keys of course using --gen-key. I also installed geheimnis as well as gpa, and --list-keys Dallam shows that the keys are there, as does --list-public-keys Dallam. I am at the point of being losted with this now, and am hoping that someone on this list uses SuSE and might enlighten me as to what the problem is and how I go about resolving it. Would it make a difference that I only used one name (Dallam) insted of both names for the userid? Also, after I generated the keys was there something else that I was supposed to do perhaps (other than to create a revocation certificate) that I might have missed? Anyway, I am hoping that someone will be able to help me with this before I pull to much more hair out :) Thanks. Dallam -- Registered Linux User #213656 2217 4EB8 461D 743B 47CF 0D68 C32A 5CDE A89A 2371 msg22411/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
What's the '*' symbol in thread tree?
I found the star in ACS display of thread tree but I can not find explanation in manual. What does it mean? Something... | +-* charlie
Re: What's the '*' symbol in thread tree?
Charles Jie wrote: I found the star in ACS display of thread tree but I can not find explanation in manual. What does it mean? it means that mutt is _guessing_ that the threads are related because of the subject line, and not because of 'In-Reply-To' headers and such. you can turn off this behaviour by setting strict_threads in your .muttrc. w
Re: utf-8 display problem index vs. pager
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote: Hi, On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 Stephan Seitz spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] PS: How do you call w3m to display html mails? mailcap text/html; w3m -T text/html %s /mailcap You could also add a 'copiousoutput' at the end of that, and set auto_view text/html in your muttrc to put w3m's output into your pager. pv. ---end quoted text--- text/html; w3m -dump -T text/html %s; copiousoutput above works well for me (using auto_view) -- Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 Registered at: http://counter.li.org
?'s and hide_missing
Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back? It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today, with hide_missing set, I see something like this ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-Re: foo `-?-Re: foo The string of leading ?'s takes up a lot of space and, IMHO, doesn't convey much useful information. Instead, I'd like to see ?-Re: foo `-?-Re: foo This is more compact, but I can still tell how the two messages relate to one another. This used to be the behavior when hide_missing was unset, correct? Is this no longer possible? Thanks! Sam
failed build
i'm giving another go at getting the beta mutt to compile on an outdated linux machine (for which i don't have root access). i'm not sure what distribution it is, although i'd guess redhat; kernel is really old (2.0.36). i have my own ncurses and libiconv installed in my home directory. i'm configuring with: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-R/home/will/lib ./configure --prefix=/home/will --with-libiconv-prefix=/home/will --with-curses=/home/will/ i then get this error: gcc -DPKGDATADIR=\/home/will/share/mutt\ -DSYSCONFDIR=\/home/will/etc\ -DBINDIR=\/home/will/bin\ -DMUTTLOCALEDIR=\/home/will/share/locale\ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -I. -I. -Iintl -I/home/will//include -I/home/will/include -I./intl -I/home/will/include -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -c patchlist.c In file included from protos.h:20, from mutt.h:811, from patchlist.c:5: mbyte.h:23: conflicting types for `wcwidth' /usr/include/wchar.h:209: previous declaration of `wcwidth' make[2]: *** [patchlist.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/will/mutt-1.3.25' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/will/mutt-1.3.25' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 sepia% uname -srm Linux 2.0.36 i686 ideas? w
Re: How to place a request of receipt for an outgoing mail?
Hi, Erika, It looks your postman is specailly friendly to you and you never have to sign a receipt for a registered snail mail. (Or you just reject them all. :) I think such function or mechanism USEFUL because some people, including me, need it from time to time. And I believe most of people won't abuse it and annoy others. It could be thought more positively. best, charlie On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 06:28:05PM +0100, Erika Pacholleck wrote: [03.01.02 11:30 +0800] Charles Jie -- : What I want to get is the RECIPIENT's answering (eg. thru a dialog box), not of the system. The value of this mechanism is that the recipient is automatically prompted for a receipt, and I can get noticed as soon as possible when he/she is back or available - avoiding many calls in vain. How do you want to prompt at the recipients side? You might get from my headers my MUA (if I do not forbid to send it) but besides this maybe-information you don't know anything, not the system I am running nore the layout. Or do you expect every MUA to include a mechanism to interupt with prompting? And what, just in case M$ has already thought of this, I click it away? Do you expect to stop the whole system until the recipient has sent out the receipt? If it is that important mail might not be the right choice at all. -- Erika Pacholleck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ?'s and hide_missing
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:43:27PM -0500, Samuel Padgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back? It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today, with hide_missing set, I see something like this ?-?-?-?-?-?-?-Re: foo `-?-Re: foo The string of leading ?'s takes up a lot of space and, IMHO, doesn't convey much useful information. Instead, I'd like to see ?-Re: foo `-?-Re: foo This is more compact, but I can still tell how the two messages relate to one another. This used to be the behavior when hide_missing was unset, correct? Is this no longer possible? This is currently impossible, because a lot of people didn't want to see any of the question marks. I mean to get back to some threading loose ends in the next few days, so I'll add a $hide_missing_parents option, or some such. Should be easy to do. -Daniel -- Daniel E. Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED] We should go forth on the shortest walk perchance, in the spirit of undying adventure, never to return,--prepared to send back our embalmed hearts only as relics to our desolate kingdoms. --Henry David Thoreau, Walking
New vs. Deleted flags
Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around that? Thanks. -Ken
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
Previously, Ken Weingold wrote: % Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the % status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around % that? Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet. The way around it would be something like this: macro index d clear-flagNdelete-message delete the current entry Shawn -- Everything you can imagine is real. -- Pablo Picasso
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
On Sun, Jan 6, 2002, Shawn D. McPeek wrote: Previously, Ken Weingold wrote: % Is it by design that if you mark a new message for deletion, the % status bar still indicates it as new? If so, is there any way around % that? Well, it sort of is technically new as you haven't read it yet. The way around it would be something like this: macro index d clear-flagNdelete-message delete the current entry Yeah, that works, but I had to change it slightly to: macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current entry since I have $resolve set to yes. :) Thanks, Shawn. -Ken
Re: sentmail and gpg
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, Michael Wagner wrote: must I put my pub key-id or my sub key-id in ~/.gnupg/options? I'm not working much with gpg, so I don't no it. I make The either will work, although you will probably get a message about it changing to the public key if you choose the sub key. So I'd recommend choosing the one that starts with pub, which on my system is the first line. HTH, David -- All generalizations are false, including this one. -- Mark Twain - David Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] | David Clarke s3353950 Key Fingerprint : 869B 53DD 5E80 E1F0 93F6 9871 0508 0296 5957 F723 msg22422/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
At 02:15 -0500 07 Jan 2002, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current entry That won't work properly on the last message in a mailbox. since I have $resolve set to yes. :) It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth msg22423/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus: macro index d clear-flagNdelete-message delete the current entry ... macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current entry Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message that isn't new? ;) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I'm glad I'm not bisexual. I couldn't stand being rejected by men as well as women. -- Bernard Manning msg22424/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current entry Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message that isn't new? ;) No, clear-flagN just seems to clear the 'N' flag if it exists. If not, it does nothing, other than preceding to the next message if $resolve it set to 'yes'. -Ken
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
At 00:47 -0700 07 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus: macro index d clear-flagNprevious-undeleteddelete-message delete the current entry Wouldn't these set read messages to new if you try to delete a message that isn't new? ;) No, clear-flag does exactly that, it clears flags. It should be pretty easy to check this out, since by default clear-flag is bound to W in the index. Now, toggle-new... -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ Beware of the Turing Tar-pit in which everything is possible but nothing of interest is easy. msg22426/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New vs. Deleted flags
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Aaron Schrab wrote: It would probably be a better idea to have the macro turn off $resolve at the beginning then turn it back on before doing the actual deletion. True. How do I do this, then? I have tried to few things, but nothing seems to work correctly. Thanks. -Ken
