regex in hook question
Hi, I'd like to create a message_hook based on from address that captures the from address for use in the hook. Is that doable? I'd imagine something like this: message-hook ~f(.*) 'set editor=myeditor -f \1' In this contrived example, I'd like to pass the value of the From: field as an argument to the editor script when replying, using \1 to insert the value captured by the first set of parentheses in the regex. I'm certainly understanding of the implementation challenges with my imagined syntax, but is there any way to do this? TIA, -- Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com| http://chipsquips.com pgpvpmPrm1Djj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: regex in hook question
Hello Chip, On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:08:38PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: I'd like to create a message_hook based on from address that captures the from address for use in the hook. Is that doable? I'd imagine something like this: message-hook ~f(.*) 'set editor=myeditor -f \1' +1 I also want to do this, for hiding the local hostname in the Message-ID: send2-hook '~f ^.*@(.*)$' 'set hostname=\1' Johannes pgppR2Cw3YGmM.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: a folder-hook question
'folder-hook . XXX' certainly works! Thanks, folks ;) Clay -- Isaac Claymore /\ASCII Ribbon Campaign Dawning Inc.\ /Respect for open standards Beijing, China X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.dawning.com.cn / \No M$ Word docs in email
Re: a folder-hook question
* Isaac Claymore [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-30-02 23:31]: It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered, but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? I need to reset something back to normal upon leaving a folder, after setting it to folder-specific value in a folder-hook. I cant seem to find such a hook, did I missed anything? or is there some other trick to do that? From TFM: To specify a default command, use the pattern `.'': folder-hook . set sort=date-sent Default will match any folder for which you do not have a folder-hook defined. Effectively a 'leave-folder-hook-reset-to-normal-folder-hook'.' -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
Re: a folder-hook question
Hi Isaac, * Isaac Claymore [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27. Sep. 2002]: It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered, but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? Notwendig, but there is hope: I need to reset something back to normal upon leaving a folder, after setting it to folder-specific value in a folder-hook. folder-hooks are evaluated in the order they appear in the muttrc. You can use more than only one folder-hook when changing folders. So you *first* declare a default hook which matches every folder and produces your normal behavior: #by default sort messages according their date of arrival: folder-hook . set sort=date-received and then you declare the specific behavior you want in case you enter this specific folder: # in folder with copys of the emails i wrote sort according date folder-hook . set pgp_verify_sig=yes # in folders which are in my mailing list directory sort as threads: folder-hook +~ml/ set sort=threads So every time you enter a new folder first of all the default behavior is established and the specific behaviro only in the specified case(s). Ciao, Gregor -- The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. -- William Gibson
a folder-hook question
Hi, mutters. It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered, but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? I need to reset something back to normal upon leaving a folder, after setting it to folder-specific value in a folder-hook. I cant seem to find such a hook, did I missed anything? or is there some other trick to do that? Thanks. Clay -- Isaac Claymore /\ASCII Ribbon Campaign Dawning Inc.\ /Respect for open standards Beijing, China X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.dawning.com.cn / \No M$ Word docs in email
Re: Hook question - making a point
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 14:11]: BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? it depends. really - it all depends on the language you currently have available. I was talking about Mutt ;) So was I. more specifically, I was talking about the regular expression library used within mutt. send-hook . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' this should work. untested, though. Just tested it and it doesn't work... hmm.. the pattern might need quoting: send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' try again. does it work now? Nope... Jerome -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Hook question - making a point
Hi, * Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi! * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 08:18]: send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' try again. does it work now? Nope... send-hook ~t . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook ! ~t . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Yes, this works. But it's not far from what I had: send-hook '~t .' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook !'~t .' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Thanks anyway. Regards, Jerome -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Hook question
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jerome -- ...and then Jerome De Greef said... % % I think I have the solution: Yay! % % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]' % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd need ..* in your patterns instead of just .* 'cuz the former is one character plus zero or more characters while the latter still accepts none. Perhaps it works simply because there is a To: header to check versus one being absent; in that case, you can probably leave off the asterisk. It works as is. But you're right, I thought .* was doing what ..* does. I'm not that good with regular expressions. BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? Jerome -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Hook question - making a point
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 09:25]: % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd need ..* in your patterns instead of just .* 'cuz the former is one character plus zero or more characters while the latter still accepts none. Perhaps it works simply because there is a To: header to check versus one being absent; in that case, you can probably leave off the asterisk. It works as is. But you're right, I thought .* was doing what ..* does. I'm not that good with regular expressions. BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? it depends. really - it all depends on the language you currently have available. The operator '+' might not be available at all. But the usual workaround for 1 or more times of X is to use XX*. Anyway, if you simply need a default rule for all addresses then you need to check for just only character in the address, right? Checking for more is simply superfluous. Also, the pattern in the send-hook command is applied to the addresses in TO/CC, anyway, so all you need is to give part of the address: send-hook . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' this should work. untested, though. Sven [who always sends with a replyable address] -- Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] MUTT SETUP TIPS: http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html MUTT HOOKS EXAMPLE: send-hook . 'set signature=~/.sig.mine' send-hook guckes 'set signature='
Re: Hook question - making a point
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 09:25]: % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd need ..* in your patterns instead of just .* 'cuz the former is one character plus zero or more characters while the latter still accepts none. Perhaps it works simply because there is a To: header to check versus one being absent; in that case, you can probably leave off the asterisk. It works as is. But you're right, I thought .* was doing what ..* does. I'm not that good with regular expressions. BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? it depends. really - it all depends on the language you currently have available. I was talking about Mutt ;) The operator '+' might not be available at all. But the usual workaround for 1 or more times of X is to use XX*. Anyway, if you simply need a default rule for all addresses then you need to check for just only character in the address, right? Checking for more is simply superfluous. Right... Also, the pattern in the send-hook command is applied to the addresses in TO/CC, anyway, so all you need is to give part of the address: send-hook . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' this should work. untested, though. Just tested it and it doesn't work... Jerome -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Hook question - making a point
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 14:11]: BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? it depends. really - it all depends on the language you currently have available. I was talking about Mutt ;) So was I. more specifically, I was talking about the regular expression library used within mutt. send-hook . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' this should work. untested, though. Just tested it and it doesn't work... hmm.. the pattern might need quoting: send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' try again. does it work now? Sven
Re: Hook question
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-15 08:20 -0500: send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]' The first hook is used whenever I hit 'r' and there is a 'To:' line followed by any address. The second hook is used when I hit 'F' (newsgroup followup). It matches any 'To:' line where the address is not anything... thus matching no 'To:' line at all. I would like to set my Bcc headers on that basis, but it seems to work randomly only! send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr Bcc: mymail' send-hook !'~t .*' 'unmy_hdr Bcc' I would be very happy if anyone could tell me what to do in order to turn off my Bcc header automatically when posting. -Andre msg25620/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Hook question - describe your problem!
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 18:34]: I would like to set my Bcc headers on that basis, but it seems to work randomly only! send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr Bcc: mymail' send-hook !'~t .*' 'unmy_hdr Bcc' I would be very happy if anyone could tell me what to do in order to turn off my Bcc header automatically when posting. send-hook . unmy_hdr * this should turn off *all* extra headers. set now set your BCC header as you need. btw, your first send-hook reads like this: When TO contains an address of arbitrary length then set the following BCC line. And the length can be ZERO, too! Get to know your regular expressions! (And next time start a new thread, ok?) I think it's time for a workshop on regex here in Berlin.. Anyway, you did not describe what the hooks shall do. And it's a waste of time trying to guess it. Sven [read da book! see sig..] -- Title: Mastering Regular Expressions Author:Jeffrey Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Publisher: O'Reilly, 1997, 1-56592-257-3 URL: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/regex/
Re: Hook question - describe your problem!
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-16 20:26 -0500: * Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 18:34]: I would like to set my Bcc headers on that basis, but it seems to work randomly only! send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr Bcc: mymail' send-hook !'~t .*' 'unmy_hdr Bcc' I would be very happy if anyone could tell me what to do in order to turn off my Bcc header automatically when posting. send-hook . unmy_hdr * this should turn off *all* extra headers. set now set your BCC header as you need. btw, your first send-hook reads like this: When TO contains an address of arbitrary length then set the following BCC line. And the length can be ZERO, too! Get to know your regular expressions! (And next time start a new thread, ok?) I think it's time for a workshop on regex here in Berlin.. Anyway, you did not describe what the hooks shall do. And it's a waste of time trying to guess it. Sven, thank you very much for your response and your time. What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting. Jerome came up with the solution above which indeed works for From-headers, but not really (read: consistantly) for Bcc-headers, at least for me. What I want is to test if there is a To-header or not - if there is one, I'm mailing, if there is none, I'm posting. If I'm mailing, add a Bcc header (I'm Bccing all mail to myself to keep track of it). If not, do not add this header because this results in an ugly To: undiclosed recipients ; line in my postings. I've tried an otherwise empty .muttrc file and send-hook . unmy_hdr * send-hook '~t ..*' 'my_hdr Bcc: mail' send-hook !'~t ..*' 'my_hdr Bcc: news' Testing the settings: 1. (mail) no bcc 2. (mail) bcc: mail 3. (news) bcc: mail 4. (news) bcc: news So it seems to work, but the send-hook is one message late. -Andre msg25625/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Hook question
I think I have the solution: send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]' The first hook is used whenever I hit 'r' and there is a 'To:' line followed by any address. The second hook is used when I hit 'F' (newsgroup followup). It matches any 'To:' line where the address is not anything... thus matching no 'To:' line at all. It's maybe a 'dirty trick' but it does it ;) Jerome * Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 13:14 -0500: * Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a newsgroup user ? Thanks in advance for any help. Jerome Sorry I messed my other posting up. folder-hook nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: news' folder-hook !nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: mail' That cannot work as I don't change folders between replying to the newsgroup (hitting 'F') or personnally to a user (hitting 'r'). Well I tested it once, not enough... When I'm in my mbox mutt and hit reply, it get my_hdr mail, when I switch to a newsgroup and hit reply, I get my_hdr news, as expected. But when I go back to mbox mutt and hit reply, still my_hdr news, and I don't see why. Same thing when I replace nntp above with . It could have been done using ~h and searching for Newsgroups: in the header but send-hook doesn't allow to use ~h. Yeah that would make things really easy. And I cannot use ~t because when you reply to a newsgroup you don't have any To: line in the header... When you hit reply via mail, there is a to header ;) -Andre -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Hook question
Jerome -- ...and then Jerome De Greef said... % % I think I have the solution: Yay! % % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]' % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd need ..* in your patterns instead of just .* 'cuz the former is one character plus zero or more characters while the latter still accepts none. Perhaps it works simply because there is a To: header to check versus one being absent; in that case, you can probably leave off the asterisk. % ... % It's maybe a 'dirty trick' but it does it ;) Those are the best :-) % % Jerome HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg2/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Another auto hook question
Ok, I've got a send-hook like this: send-hook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]) set pgp_create_traditional However, it still makes the MIME-type application:pgp. Is there a way to make it lie and call them text? Crackmonkey bounces funky MIME-types. msg25576/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Another auto hook question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Shawn McMahon on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:38:02PM -0500: Ok, I've got a send-hook like this: send-hook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]) set pgp_create_traditional However, it still makes the MIME-type application:pgp. Is there a way to make it lie and call them text? Crackmonkey bounces funky MIME-types. You need to either use a macro to pipe to gpg, or you need to try the Outlook compatibility patch. I believe that the patch was going to be rolled into the main distribution? - -- [!] Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP 0xC9C40C31 -=- http://codesorcery.net http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8kj+P94d6K8nEDDERAnN4AJwI7OJnDsKovGUzA5WgK9YH3uoAeACeMy9d ghhYhR36rLYUIRe/HSXLFN8= =PjLH -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Another auto hook question
This one time, at band camp, Justin R. Miller wrote: You need to either use a macro to pipe to gpg, or you need to try the Outlook compatibility patch. I believe that the patch was going to be rolled into the main distribution? Maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but it seems to me that clear-signed message is plain text that happens to contain some PGP text, not an application:pgp-signed message at all, and it is thus broken behavior for mutt to label it as such. What am I missing here? msg25581/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Another auto hook question
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % This one time, at band camp, Justin R. Miller wrote: % % You need to either use a macro to pipe to gpg, or you need to try the % Outlook compatibility patch. I believe that the patch was going to be ... % % What am I missing here? Please check the archives for numerous voluminously vehement discussions regarding PGP-MIME and inline PGP and 7bit and 8bit and QP and LookOut! and more. That should catch you up :-) In particular, look for threads featuring Shane Wegener or Dale Woolridge; Shane originally wrote the pgp_outlook_compat patch and then Dale extended it into the form that has been discussed for inclusion in the stock code. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg25583/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Hook question
Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a newsgroup user ? Thanks in advance for any help. Jerome -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Hook question
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a newsgroup user ? Thanks in advance for any help. Jerome folder-hook nntp my_hdr bla1 folder-hook !nntp my_hdr bla2 -Andre msg25496/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Hook question
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a newsgroup user ? Thanks in advance for any help. Jerome Sorry I messed my other posting up. folder-hook nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: news' folder-hook !nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: mail' -Andre msg25498/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Hook question
Andre, et al -- ...and then Andre Berger said... % % folder-hook nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: news' % folder-hook !nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: mail' Since one doesn't change folders without leaving the folder, you might say, couldn't the send-hooks be left out and you just set the From: header when you enter each folder? % % -Andre % HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg25500/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Hook question
* Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a newsgroup user ? Thanks in advance for any help. Jerome Sorry I messed my other posting up. folder-hook nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: news' folder-hook !nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: mail' That cannot work as I don't change folders between replying to the newsgroup (hitting 'F') or personnally to a user (hitting 'r'). It could have been done using ~h and searching for Newsgroups: in the header but send-hook doesn't allow to use ~h. And I cannot use ~t because when you reply to a newsgroup you don't have any To: line in the header... Thanks anyway ;) Jerome -- +---+ | 'the panorama of the city is wrong | | in fact the city seems to be gone!' | | the clash, stop the world, 1980 | +---+
Re: Folder-hook question
* On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 05:40:21PM -0800, * Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is what I use: folder-hook +Incoming/mutt-users 'macro index M :push mail^[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M^M mail to list' ^^ Can't you just leave this part out? Note that I have 'askcc' set, so one of those ^Ms is an answer to the Cc: prompt. Nicolas
Re: Folder-hook question
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:18:10AM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: * On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 05:40:21PM -0800, * Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is what I use: folder-hook +Incoming/mutt-users 'macro index M :push mail^[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M^M mail to list' ^^ Can't you just leave this part out? Apparently so. This seems to work as well: :macro pager M mail[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M^M I had thought that an index macro just executed commands in the index menu and would not be able to enter keystrokes into prompts from the mail command. I would have expected at least those last two '^M's in the second macro to have been executed after the mail command was completed. So I guess I don't understand mutt's macro processing as well as I though I did. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |
Folder-hook question
Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently): http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at the To: header for me. Since the method used by Han doesn't seem to work, I ask you now: do you know if what I'm trying to do is possible? Thanks, Carlos. -- Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Folder-hook question
* On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 06:12:00PM -0200, * Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently): http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks Sorry I can't look at the website, because I have no webaccess at the moment. And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at the To: header for me. Since the method used by Han doesn't seem to work, I ask you now: do you know if what I'm trying to do is possible? folder-hook . bind index m mail folder-hook dsa macro index m \maildsa\ \Mail verschicken\ There is an tab after the dsa to show me an list of aliases beginning with dsa, but I think if you replace the tab with an \n it would be your wanted behaviour. Nicolas
Re: Folder-hook question
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Carlos Laviola wrote: Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently): http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at the To: header for me. Since the method used by Han doesn't seem to work, I ask you now: do you know if what I'm trying to do is possible? folder-hook mutt my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You do have to hit enter to get it to accept the To: field, but at least you don't have to type it. Don't know how to set it up so that it automagically enters it though. msg24532/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Folder-hook question
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:26:32PM -0600, Knute wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Carlos Laviola wrote: Hi, I'm wanting to do something like this guy did (apparently): http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/dot-mutt/folderhooks And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at the To: header for me. Since the method used by Han doesn't seem to work, I ask you now: do you know if what I'm trying to do is possible? folder-hook mutt my_hdr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You do have to hit enter to get it to accept the To: field, but at least you don't have to type it. Don't know how to set it up so that it automagically enters it though. This is what I use: folder-hook +Incoming/mutt-users 'macro index M :push mail^[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M^M mail to list' Note that I have 'askcc' set, so one of those ^Ms is an answer to the Cc: prompt. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |
Re: Folder-hook question
On 18:12 15 Feb 2002, Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | And have a rule that makes it so that when I press m while in a certain | folder, the message already has the list (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) at | the To: header for me. Since the method used by Han doesn't seem to | work, I ask you now: do you know if what I'm trying to do is possible? I'm curious. I just use g (group reply) and it puts the list address there anyway. If I'm making a fresh thread I either use g and trim the headers (fresh subject, remove References: and In-Reply-To: stuff) or outright just mail to mutt-users, pissibly looking it up with ^T (external query). Of course, this doesn't answer your folder-hook query, but I'm wondering why you have to use folder-hook? -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ For reading rec.moto, I use one of those carbon-fiber Logitech mice w/a little 'No Fear' sticker on it. - Mike Hardcore DoD#5010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apologies to Primus
Re: save-hook question
yes, i have considered prcomail and other such filtering, but i would like the mail to stay in my inbox, and when i have read it, i like to hit "s" "enter"...lazy and quick... On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:00:23PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote: On 01/12/01, 10:27:19PM -0500, Okan Demirmen - mutt wrote: newbie-type: some patience required, unless stupidity is too obvious... can a save-hook have a regex in it?...if so, i might be totally clueless... i am trying to save mail to folders, whose names are based on a mailing list...wihtout creating a save-hook for every single mailing list i get the matching portion ok, but can't seem to get the save folder part... anyone help??.. thanks, okan Have you looked at procmail to filter into folders? Much easier. -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT
save-hook question
newbie-type: some patience required, unless stupidity is too obvious... can a save-hook have a regex in it?...if so, i might be totally clueless... i am trying to save mail to folders, whose names are based on a mailing list...wihtout creating a save-hook for every single mailing list i get the matching portion ok, but can't seem to get the save folder part... anyone help??.. thanks, okan
mutt and hook question
I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox one. Is it possible? If yes, how? Thanks for replying .oesse. -- -- Marco Giardini TecnoGi spa Tel. +39 0321 885422 Strada per Gravellona Fax +39 0321 885333 Borgolavezzaro (NO) http://www.tecnogi.com Key fingerprint = B5 B4 AA 91 89 50 43 8F B1 6B C6 8C 34 79 5A 7F
Re: mutt and hook question
Big Brother tells me that Marco Giardini wrote: I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox one. Is it possible? If yes, how? Thanks for replying fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +special-folder -- "Restore your inalienable human rights. Jack McKinney Vote Libertarian. http://www.lp.org http://www.lorentz.com http://www.harrybrowne2000.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/D68F2C07 4096g/38AEF076 PGP signature
Re: Send hook question
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:51:31AM -0400, David T-G wrote: Hal -- ...and then Hal Burgiss said... % % Yea, it works fine with autoedit off, but I like autoedit too :( What does autoedit get you that you can't have otherwise? Do you have edit_hdrs set, maybe, and like to play with your headers there? Yes, I do have it set. But mostly I think the autoedit is a bit easier (ie I am lazy :), especially when replying. The 'To' and 'Subject' normally have already been decided in this case. I rarely change To or Subject on a reply. Now, for a new mail, it makes perfect sense. I find that edit_hdrs lets me muck around to my heart's content, but I leave autoedit off so that I can specify a To: entry so that hooks work. I also have $askbcc and $askcc turned off; I do that in the editor... Same here. Maybe this just takes some getting used to. I guess I want my cake and to eat it too as they say. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
mostly I think the autoedit is a bit easier (ie I am lazy :), especially when replying. The 'To' and 'Subject' normally have already been decided in this case. I rarely change To or Subject on a reply. Now, for a new mail, it makes perfect sense. Perhaps you are searching for set autoedit = no set fast_reply = yes
Re: Send hook question
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 03:52:49PM +0200, Ulf Erikson wrote: mostly I think the autoedit is a bit easier (ie I am lazy :), especially when replying. The 'To' and 'Subject' normally have already been decided in this case. I rarely change To or Subject on a reply. Now, for a new mail, it makes perfect sense. Perhaps you are searching for set autoedit = no set fast_reply = yes Yes, I am ;) You are a good man Ulf. Thanks. Life is good again. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
Hal -- ...and then Hal Burgiss said... % % Yea, it works fine with autoedit off, but I like autoedit too :( What does autoedit get you that you can't have otherwise? Do you have edit_hdrs set, maybe, and like to play with your headers there? I find that edit_hdrs lets me muck around to my heart's content, but I leave autoedit off so that I can specify a To: entry so that hooks work. I also have $askbcc and $askcc turned off; I do that in the editor... :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0. PGP signature
Re: Send hook question
Hal Burgiss muttered: do you have 'autoedit' set? He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is obvious - give up that autoedit stuff. Yea, it works fine with autoedit off, but I like autoedit too :( You confuse me with your from header for a minute ;) Oh, I'm sorry. I just sourced your muttrc for testing and forgot to resource my own one. :( I don't have a clue how combine autoedit and send-hooks. Harold says it is possible so maybe you should start a new muttrc from scratch and you'll see which line confuses mutt. P.S. Check your Mail-Followup-To: HTH, Michael -- Memory fault -- core...uh...um...core... Oh dammit, I forget! PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65 40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13
Re: Send hook question
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:27:38PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Hal Burgiss muttered: I don't have a clue how combine autoedit and send-hooks. Harold says it is possible so maybe you should start a new muttrc from scratch and you'll see which line confuses mutt. Sounds challenging. Would have to take a few options at a time. If I did a new one with all the features I like/want in one fell swoop, I would have the exact same muttrc ;) I'll play with this this weekend. Also, either I am suffering premature senile dementia, or this was working not too long ago. Oh well ... P.S. Check your Mail-Followup-To: Thanks. Was wondering why I was getting duplicates. You just gotta love mutt for all the configuration options. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
Hal Burgiss muttered: Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though. send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' These _have_ to work. If they don't, I'd suspect that there is something else disturbing. Just copy / pasted your send-hooks into my mutt - they work. Please post your whole muttrc. HTH, Michael -- The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it. PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65 40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13
Re: Send hook question
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 01:30:40AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:29:30PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:25:47PM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~C redhat-list' 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' No, sorry, it does not work. Neither does '~t'. ??? Hi, Hmm, strange. I just tried it here, and it works fine for me. Not sure why it doesn't work for you. Just to be clear, what exactly is happening? Is the From: always being set to From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED], or is something else happening? Yes, Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] is it. Despite many variations. Unless I am going crazy, this was working fine not too long ago. I suspect something else upgraded is messing with things. But I can't think what that would be. Thanks. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Hal Burgiss muttered: Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though. I'll try that. That came from an example in the original Muttrc when I first installed a couple of years ago. send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' These _have_ to work. If they don't, I'd suspect that there is something else disturbing. Just copy / pasted your send-hooks into my mutt - they work. Please post your whole muttrc. http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Hal Burgiss muttered: unset use_from Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though. Still no go. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
do you have 'autoedit' set? if you do, here's what happens: when you hit 'm' to start a message, there is no recipient specified, so 'from' gets set to the default value. you have to let mutt prompt for the recipient before you edit, so that it can set the 'from' header. peter On 5 Oct 00, 7:49AM, Hal Burgiss wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: Hal Burgiss muttered: Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from Don't know why you do that, but according to the docs it shouldn't hurt. It might be worth testing without this line, though. I'll try that. That came from an example in the original Muttrc when I first installed a couple of years ago. send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' These _have_ to work. If they don't, I'd suspect that there is something else disturbing. Just copy / pasted your send-hooks into my mutt - they work. Please post your whole muttrc. http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Peter Jaques [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cs.oberlin.edu/~pjaques klezmerbalkanturkish clarinet; free foodshelter; books to prisoners
Re: Send hook question
Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 05 Oct 2000: FWIW, I've been trying to do something very similar... mutt 1.2.5i send-hook . 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook .*lugnet\.com 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]' from what I can tell, the send hook DOES work, only AFTER I actually send the mail... so if I write a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], my from is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", but the next mail is from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"... what am I missing? You can't use "set from" to change the current message's From header. It is *only* used as a default from header value for new messages (new mails and replies too unless $reverse_name comes into effect). If you want to set the From header from a send-hook, you must use "my_hdr From:". Regards, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / ST, DS9: FRofA #1: Once you have their money ... never give it back.
Re: Send hook question
Peter Jaques muttered: Please post your whole muttrc. http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc do you have 'autoedit' set? He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is obvious - give up that autoedit stuff. HTH, Michael -- Our informal mission is to improve the love life of operators worldwide. -- Peter Behrendt, president of Exabyte PGP-fingerprint: DECA E9D2 EBDD 0FE0 0A65 40FA 5967 ACA1 0B57 7C13
Re: Send hook question
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:08:48PM +0200, Hal Burgiss wrote: Peter Jaques muttered: Please post your whole muttrc. http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc do you have 'autoedit' set? He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is obvious - give up that autoedit stuff. Hi, No, I don't think autoedit has anything to do with the problem. I have autoedit set in my .muttrc, and the send-hooks that Hal posted work fine for me. I don't see anything obviously wrong in Hal's muttrc file either though. -Harold -- "Life sucks, deal with it!"
Re: Send hook question
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:08:48PM +0200, Hal Burgiss wrote: Peter Jaques muttered: Please post your whole muttrc. http://feenix.eyep.net/xstuff/muttrc do you have 'autoedit' set? He does. And that's why the send-hooks do not work. So, Hal the solution is obvious - give up that autoedit stuff. Yea, it works fine with autoedit off, but I like autoedit too :( You confuse me with your from header for a minute ;) -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Send hook question
Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Mutt 1.2i (2000-05-09) Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others. System: Linux 2.2.16pre3 [using slang 10202] Updated RH6.2 from src.rpm. TIA -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Send hook question
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:58:13PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Hi, I think send-hook is expecting a pattern where you have redhat-list. Does the following work better for you? send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~C redhat-list' 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]' -Harold -- "Life sucks, deal with it!"
save-hook question
Would it be possible to setup a save-hook that would open the browser in a specific subdirectory so that I could easily the right mailbox? TIA, Adahma
Re: save-hook question
Adahma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 08 Jun 2000: Would it be possible to setup a save-hook that would open the browser in a specific subdirectory so that I could easily the right mailbox? I just tried this: save-hook "~f adahma" +foo ... and created the directory ~/Mail/foo When I pressed s(save), I got the default prompt =foo, when I pressed TAB, Mutt appended / to the =foo, and the second TAB took me to the directory browser in the dir =foo/. Is this what you're looking for? Regards, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / If you don't use punctuation there is no point in what you write
Re: save-hook question
Adahma -- ...and then Adahma said... % Would it be possible to setup a save-hook that would open the % browser in a specific subdirectory so that I could easily the right % mailbox? It sounds like what you want is a macro, but perhaps you might want a save-hook that changes the directory based on the message. First, then, the macro. You could create a macro like macro pager ,c "change-folder=/some/dir/tab" to enter the change-folder command (bound to 'c' by default), enter ctrl-u to erase the supplied line contents (if any), specify the path to your desired dir, and even hit a tab to list the contents for you. Now, if you could predefine the directory somehow, like matching on the domain name, then you could create a save hook like save-hook @domain.com =/domain/%O to save in your $HOME/Mail/domain dir under mutt's 'O'riginal mailbox name. % % TIA, % Adahma :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0. Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh* PGP signature
Re: Save-hook question
Hello! You seem to be using the compressed folders patch? I'll look into it. Quoting r. Stewart V. Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Save-hook question": Hi all, ... As a second question - how can I convince mutt that there is new mail in compressed folders? I have procmail deliver some mail to compressed folders. Then in my .muttrc I have mailboxes ! +'aip.gz' "+majordomo.gz" +mutt.gz and none of these seems to allow mutt to determine that there is new mail in the compressed file. Any ideas / suggestions? -- This message content is not part of Intel's views or affairs Michael S. Tsirkin Four things are to be strengthened: Torah,and good deeds, prayer and one's good manners (Berachoth)
Re: Save-hook question
Stewart V. Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fcc-save-hook ~A +People/%O.gz However, recently one of my correspondents has had their email name changed to all capitals, so now rather than being saved in People/personx.gz mutt wants to create People/PERSONX.gz Someone created a patch that will cause the following expanded text to be lower-cased if you use the "_" prefix. Like so: fcc-save-hook ~A +People/%_O.gz However, I cannot recall if this is standard behavior now, or if it still requires a patch. The behavior *is* in the version that I'm using (or at least, it's in the manual), but I am using the development version of Mutt, 1.1. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Save-hook question
Hi all, I have the following hook set in my .muttrc : fcc-save-hook~A +People/%O.gz Effectively unless I specify it elsewhere my mail gets saved to People/MailName.gz However, recently one of my correspondents has had their email name changed to all capitals, so now rather than being saved in People/personx.gz mutt wants to create People/PERSONX.gz Short of using procmail to rewrite all incoming mail addresses to lower case is there some change I can make in my .muttrc ? As a second question - how can I convince mutt that there is new mail in compressed folders? I have procmail deliver some mail to compressed folders. Then in my .muttrc I have mailboxes ! +'aip.gz' "+majordomo.gz" +mutt.gz and none of these seems to allow mutt to determine that there is new mail in the compressed file. Any ideas / suggestions? Cheers, S. -- "Theory!" he said. "Theory! Damned important, that. You set a technician on a problem. He'll fool around. Waste lifetimes. Get nowhere. Just putter about at random. A true scientist works with theory. Lets math solve his problems." -- Not Final! Isaac Asimov PGP signature
Re: just another send-hook question
Richard P. Groenewegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient. Isn't there a pattern modifier "^" that means "only"? send-hook '^~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' That matches only if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient on the To: header. Note that the Cc: header is not checked. If you really meant "only recipient of the message," you'd want ^~C instead. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: just another send-hook question
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 07:10:25 +0100, Richard P. Groenewegen wrote: Hi, Here's something that's either trivial or impossible. I want something like send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient. See the section in the manual named "Pattern Modifier". send-hook '^~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' On a related note: how do I limit to all messages send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nobody else :l^~C foo@bar\.com (or to me, but nobody else)? :l^~p -- Byrial
just another send-hook question
Hi, Here's something that's either trivial or impossible. I want something like send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient. On a related note: how do I limit to all messages send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nobody else (or to me, but nobody else)? Richard -- Zout maar niet te zout, dat vinden de mensen lekker.
Re: send-hook question
Salvatore Greco wrote: I am having a syntax hassle with my send-hooks after and upgrade. Below is a snippet of some of my send-hooks -- [send-hooks from .muttrc] send-hook '~A' 'set signature=~/.signature; my_hdr From: Salvatore Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' I'd suggest using . instead of ~A. The dot specifies a default when no other pattern matches. ~A means "all mail" and later patterns will not match. send-hook '~t abuse\@lagnet\.org\.za$' 'set signature=~/.sig.lagnet.abuse; my_hdr From: LagNet Abuse Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' christian -- No courtesy copy (CC:), please. I'm reading here!
send-hook question
Good day :) I am having a syntax hassle with my send-hooks after and upgrade. Below is a snippet of some of my send-hooks -- [send-hooks from .muttrc] send-hook '~A' 'set signature=~/.signature; my_hdr From: Salvatore Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~t abuse\@lagnet\.org\.za$' 'set signature=~/.sig.lagnet.abuse; my_hdr From: LagNet Abuse Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~t ^kline@lagnet\.org\.za$' 'set signature=~/.sig.lagnet.kline; my_hdr From: LagNet Abuse Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '~t skydiver\@lagnet\.org\.za$' 'set signature=~/.sig.lagnet; my_hdr From: Skydiver [EMAIL PROTECTED]; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ++ [ send-hooks] All help would be greatly appreciated !! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://salvo.reaper.org | ICQ #8084066
Re: a hook question
On 990720, at 14:40:58, Robert Chien wrote: basically, i want to set signature to .signature.work when sending email to people at work, and set signature to just .signature for the rest. [...] when i send email to co-workers, i can address it as "foo" or "foo@west" (notice the unqualified domain name) or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". send-hook . "set signature=.signature" send-hook @(west|(west\.)?sun\.com)$ "set signature=.signature.work" -- David Ellement [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: a hook question
Robert Chien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: basically, i want to set signature to .signature.work when sending email to people at work, and set signature to just .signature for the rest. I do that, too. Here's my setup: I want to use "localsig" if the message is one in which ALL of the recipients are local users, or "remotesig" if the message has any recipients which are external to my company. My logic might seem weird, but it's because of the "any recipients" part. The send-hook is evaluated for each address in the message to see if it's true. So, I set the signature to the "local" signature, then the next send-hook looks for recipients that are not in my local organization. Since that's the majority of where my mail gets sent, the "remotesig" is usually chosen. send-hook ~A"set signature=~/.localsig" send-hook '! ~C "@.*(convex|(convex|rsn)\.hp)\.com$"' \ "set signature=~/.remotesig" The expression matches [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. Now that I look at it, though, it needs an update on domain names, but basically it works. :) I'm wondering if my backslashes are in the right places, though, or if I have the right number of them. Since there are two levels of quotes used, maybe I should use "\\." for a dot, or "\\\." to get the proper effect. Any quote/regexp experts know for sure? :) -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson Convex Division |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
a hook question
hello mutt users, i need some help with using hook in the following situation: basically, i want to set signature to .signature.work when sending email to people at work, and set signature to just .signature for the rest. i've been playing with different hooks without any success, because it's more difficult than i first thought. when i send email to co-workers, i can address it as "foo" or "foo@west" (notice the unqualified domain name) or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". because of this wide variety, i haven't been able to successfully configure my hooks. maybe i overlooked something and the answer is really simple, if so, please point it out to me. robert
Odd hook question
I'm looking to do something resembling the following pseudo-code: I have some arbitrary field, say sender (~e in mutt) I want to say: ~e =~ /^(.*)@(.*)$/ if -d $2, then savehook becomes $2/$1. Suggestions, or time to look at hacking in a feature? (As soon as I can get autoconf to behave...) -- Jeffrey Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Normal" is a local phenomenon.
