Re: Branch Location Over The Internet
Eoip is Mikrotik only Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 11, 2015 6:28 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote: EoIP seems to be what I am looking for, however this recent Mikrotik session says: EoIP could be a solution for tunneling L2 over L3. • EoIP disadvantages: – Fragmentation of L2 frames over multiple L3 packets – Performance issues • VPLS advantages: – No fragmentation. – 60% more performance then EoIP. So it sounds like VPLS might be better than EoIP? I can't find much about EoIP online, so is this a Mikrotik only protocol? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jürgen Jaritsch j...@anexia.at wrote: Hi, Mikrotik Routerboard + (encrypted) Ethernet over IP (EoIP). If required: MPLS+OSPF+BGP in the EoIP for additional features. Build the pseudo Layer2 with two dedicated boxes. In the HQ you can hand it over directly to the MX80 and at the new office you can work with small boxes like Cisco 7301 (also available with redundant PS) or if you need more ports: 19xx ... #) cheap setup #) can easily transport a few hundred Meg #) you can use refurb parts if required #) big community support for Mikrotik Routerboards #) encrypted transport possible #) works with dynamic IPs #) MPLS in the EoIP allows you to transport VRFs with BGP signaling Etc etc Best regards Jürgen Jaritsch Head of Network Infrastructure ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH Telefon: +43-5-0556-300 Telefax: +43-5-0556-500 E-Mail: j...@anexia.at Web: http://www.anexia.at Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 -Original Message- *From:* Colton Conor [colton.co...@gmail.com] *Received:* Dienstag, 11 Aug. 2015, 20:23 *To:* NANOG [nanog@nanog.org] *Subject:* Branch Location Over The Internet We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN, and a couple of gigabit internet connections from multiple providers. The office is taking full BGP routes from tier 1 providers using a Juniper MX80. They are establishing their first branch location, and need the branch location to be able to securely communicate back to headquarters, AND be able to use a /24 of headquarters public IP addresses. Ideally the device at the HQ location would hand out public IP address using DHCP to the other side of the tunnel at the branch location. We know that in an ideal world it would be wise to get layer 2 transport connections from HQ to the branch location, but lets assume that is not an option. Please don't flood this thread about how it could be an option because it's not at this time. This setup will be temporary and in service for the next year until we get fiber to the branch site. Let's assume at the branch location we can get a DOCSIS cable internet connection from a incumbent cable provider such as Comcast, and that provider will give us a couple static IP address. Assume as a backup, we have a PPPoE DSL connection from the ILEC such as Verizon who gives us a dynamic IP address. What solution could we put at the HQ site and the branch site to achieve this? Ideally we would want the solution to load balance between the connections based on the connections speeds, and failover if one is down. The cable connection will be much faster speed (probably 150Mbps down and 10 Upload) compared to the DSL connection (10 download and 1 upload). If we need more speed we can upgrade the cable modem to a higher package, but for DSL that is the max speed so we might have to get multiple DSL lines. The cable solution could always be used as the primary, and the DSL connection could only be used as backup if that makes things easier. If you were to do this with Juniper or Cisco gear what would you have at each location? What technology would you use? I know there is Pepewave and a couple of other software solutions that seem to have a proprietary load balancing solutions developed, but I would prefer to use a common Cisco or Juniper solution if one exists. There will be 50 users at the branch office. There is only one branch location at this time, but they might expand to a couple more but under 10.
Re: M$ no v6 or just me?
There is C:\Users\jluthmandig -t www.microsoft.com +short toggle.www.ms.akadns.net. www.microsoft.com-c.edgekey.net. www.microsoft.com-c.edgekey.net.globalredir.akadns.net. e10088.dspb.akamaiedge.net. 2600:1407:10:390::2768 2600:1407:10:389::2768 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Nicholas Warren nwar...@barryelectric.com wrote: Surely Microsoft has IPv6 connectivity? Is there a problem with my dns, or is Microsoft not available over v6? Thanks, Nich
Re: Debian RWHOIS
I think this is what you're asking for: http://projects.arin.net/rwhois Should be a ./configure make make install #per this http://projects.arin.net/rwhois/docs/installation.html Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote: On 07/08/15 19:38 +, Josh Moore wrote: Hello guys, What do you use for ARIN resource assignments? I am looking to setup a Debian-based RWHOIS server but don't see much information on it. As of a couple of years ago when I looked around, there were no recent packaged versions of rwhoisd for Debian. We run a compiled version. -- Dan White
Re: leap second outage
That is my understanding as well. The event was about 3.5 hours ago. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Stefan netfort...@gmail.com wrote: This was supposed to have happened @midnight UTC, right? Meaning that we are past that event. Under which scenarios should people be concerned about midnight local time? Lots of confusing messages flying all over... On Jun 30, 2015 10:13 PM, frnk...@iname.com wrote: We experienced our first leap second outage -- our SHE (super head end) is using (old) Motorola encoders and we lost those video channels. They restarted all those encoders to restore service. Frank
Re: Google Apps for ISPs
Yes, demanding on your annual contract. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 19, 2015 6:44 PM, Andrew Duey andrew.d...@widerangebroadband.net wrote: Our Google Apps for ISP's is still up and running. We were told end of July for end of service date. I was under the impression though that there were different dates for different customers originally, but I know we're still up and running on it. --Andrew --Andrew Duey WideRange Broadband LLC Direct: 402-327-1101 andrew.d...@widerangebroadband.net http://widerangebroadband.net On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote: There was an inquiry about this just the other day. They got theirs turned back on. Check the archives for the Google contact. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com To: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 11:36:54 AM Subject: Re: Google Apps for ISPs Josh, From what I have been able to see from an outsider's point of view, they tore down the virtual machines that held those emails and while I doubt they scrubbed the hard drives, they're not available in commercially reasonable way. No ISP I've worked with has been able to get access to emails, settings, address books, or anything else since early in June and that's not from lack of trying. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 http://twitter.com/kscotthelms On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: That's all we're after, customers' emails. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 18, 2015 12:12 PM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote: We worked with dozens of service providers to get their email services migrated, AFAIK no one got an extension. I was told directly that it was possible to have an extension because Google was pulling down the entire system. I'd advise: 1) Make sure your domain TTL's are fairly low so you can change your MX record and have the world get that update shortly there after. 2) Find an alternative email provider, preferably someone who has done transitions to and from Google before. 3) Start communicating with your customers, AFAIK their email, address books, and calendars aren't available and won't be. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 http://twitter.com/kscotthelms On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: If anyone can message me off list it would be great. We were originally told the service would be shut off in July. All of the accounts were disabled June 9. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?
My equipment that can't do 5.4 with the latest stable or beta firmware says you can't. Hopefully we get 5.1 soon. :) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 19, 2015 11:36 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote: FCC Cert claims different. :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net -- *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net *Cc: *NANOG list nanog@nanog.org, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu *Sent: *Friday, June 19, 2015 9:16:37 PM *Subject: *Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup? Uhm he's not wrong... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 19, 2015 9:13 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote: The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5 GHz. Huh Please verify your facts before making blanket statements which are not accurate ... Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom - Original Message - From: Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu To: Sina Owolabi notify.s...@gmail.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org list nanog@nanog.org Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:07:01 PM Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup? I know you don't want to hear this answer because of cost but I've had good luck with Cisco for very high density (about 1,000 clients in a packed auditorium actively using the network as they follow along with the presenter). The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5 GHz. That's pretty significant because you're limited to 9 x 20 MHz channels or 4 x 40 MHz channels. Keeping the power level down and creating small cells is essential for high density, so with less channels your hands are really tied in that case. Also, avoid the Zero Handoff marketing nonsense they advertise; I'm sure it can work great for a low client residential area but it requires all APs to share a single channel and depends upon coordinating only one active transmitter at a time, so it simply won't scale. I don't have experience with other vendors at large scale or high density. I don't think what you're talking about is really high density anymore though. That's just normal coverage. Wireless is a lot more complicated than selecting a vendor, though. If you know what you're doing even Ubiquiti could work decently, but if you don't even a Cisco solution won't save you. You really need to be on top of surveying correctly and having appropriate AP placement and channel distribution. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Sina Owolabi notify.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi We are profiling equipment and design for an expected high user density network of multiple, close nit, residential/hostel units. Its going to be 8-10 buildings with possibly a over 1000 users at any given time. We are looking at Ruckus and Ubiquiti as options to get over the high number of devices we are definitely going to encounter. How did you do it, and what would you advise for product and layout? Thanks in advance! -- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net
Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?
Uhm he's not wrong... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 19, 2015 9:13 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net wrote: The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5 GHz. Huh Please verify your facts before making blanket statements which are not accurate ... Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom - Original Message - From: Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu To: Sina Owolabi notify.s...@gmail.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org list nanog@nanog.org Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:07:01 PM Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup? I know you don't want to hear this answer because of cost but I've had good luck with Cisco for very high density (about 1,000 clients in a packed auditorium actively using the network as they follow along with the presenter). The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5 GHz. That's pretty significant because you're limited to 9 x 20 MHz channels or 4 x 40 MHz channels. Keeping the power level down and creating small cells is essential for high density, so with less channels your hands are really tied in that case. Also, avoid the Zero Handoff marketing nonsense they advertise; I'm sure it can work great for a low client residential area but it requires all APs to share a single channel and depends upon coordinating only one active transmitter at a time, so it simply won't scale. I don't have experience with other vendors at large scale or high density. I don't think what you're talking about is really high density anymore though. That's just normal coverage. Wireless is a lot more complicated than selecting a vendor, though. If you know what you're doing even Ubiquiti could work decently, but if you don't even a Cisco solution won't save you. You really need to be on top of surveying correctly and having appropriate AP placement and channel distribution. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Sina Owolabi notify.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi We are profiling equipment and design for an expected high user density network of multiple, close nit, residential/hostel units. Its going to be 8-10 buildings with possibly a over 1000 users at any given time. We are looking at Ruckus and Ubiquiti as options to get over the high number of devices we are definitely going to encounter. How did you do it, and what would you advise for product and layout? Thanks in advance! -- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net
Re: Ghosts in our 6 New Ubiquity Pros - provision issues.
Do you want to set one of the radios to my Unifi server to confirm it is or isn't a controller problem? If you simply turn off your controller you can confirm as well. The devices will run as provisioned until told otherwise. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:03 AM, char...@thefnf.org wrote: On 2015-06-19 05:01, Bob Evans wrote: Ubiquiti Networks UniFi UAP-PRO Enterprise WiFi System - hard to recommend at this point. We saw people mention this brand here on the list - people like them. So what could we have set incorrectly ? They drop link and re-provision on their own at odd times day or night. Drop link all the way down to layer 1? What does re-provision mean? Lose/re acquire DHCP lease? \ What is your network topology? What kind of switches are you using? What's the length of the cable runs? Have you had an electrician check your wiring? How many access points are you running? How many fail? Do they fail in any kind of cluster/pattern? That's just the basic questions. Lots more information needed if you want free support from the NANOG hive mind :D They have millions of satisfied customers in deployments from some of the worlds largest shopping malls to multi state ISPs. Different gear across that customer base of course. We have completed everything tech support asked of us. (Really, lame emails they respond with as if they didn't read your text - they won't call and you can't call them). We used POE from ciscos - then changed to their POE provided. POE from ciscos mid span injector, or switch port? They didn't recommend it, but we plugged them all into APC UPSes. no difference. The midspan injectors you mean? H, wonder why they didn't want you to put them in UPS. Did they provide any explanation? They all re-provision at different times even when no one is connected or in the building at odd hours like 2am. Each one does this 2-3 times per 24 hour period. Interesting. Any repeated offenders? Has anyone else experienced this? Anyone know what we may have set incorrectly ? Is this normal - do people put up with the 2 mins the APs are unavailable about 3 times a day? (UniFi support acts like it's not a big issues.) Do they come back on their own? What's the downtime time window? We use the UniFi controller on mac os x. Mac OSX isn't a server platform. Sorry. Use Windows 2k12 or Ubuntu Server (or your favorite debian or Redhat flavor). I've had zero problems on either of those platforms. What's the topology between the access points and your controller server?
Re: Ghosts in our 6 New Ubiquity Pros - provision issues.
The current ToughCable really is fantastic. I'd only suggest the bigger one (carrier). The old green stuff definitely deterred a lot of people, understandably. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:05 AM, char...@thefnf.org wrote: On 2015-06-19 08:51, Mel Beckman wrote: Bob, I've deployed tons of Ubiquiti gear, and have seen this problem before. It always turns out to be poor quality cable installation. POE does not tolerate low quality connectors, especially in outdoor environments. There are many aspects to a quality cabling job, so the best thing you can do is seek out a qualified installer with outdoor POE experience. Yep. Networks. Layer 1 before everything else! So many bad cabling jobs for sure. Are people using the tough cable? That has held up really well in the installations I've done. For a few years with zero issues.
Re: Google Apps for ISPs
That's all we're after, customers' emails. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 18, 2015 12:12 PM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote: We worked with dozens of service providers to get their email services migrated, AFAIK no one got an extension. I was told directly that it was possible to have an extension because Google was pulling down the entire system. I'd advise: 1) Make sure your domain TTL's are fairly low so you can change your MX record and have the world get that update shortly there after. 2) Find an alternative email provider, preferably someone who has done transitions to and from Google before. 3) Start communicating with your customers, AFAIK their email, address books, and calendars aren't available and won't be. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 http://twitter.com/kscotthelms On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: If anyone can message me off list it would be great. We were originally told the service would be shut off in July. All of the accounts were disabled June 9. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Google Apps for ISPs
If anyone can message me off list it would be great. We were originally told the service would be shut off in July. All of the accounts were disabled June 9. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
Probably fine to NAT it yourself until it is allocated and someone starts using it. Why not just use RFC1918 space? https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1JEgabzMOJx1l25zHZK5wv4_Tn9KRsyDGgSq-M4g Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Luan Nguyen lngu...@opsource.net wrote: Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it? Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...
Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4
How many devices need IPs? Is there a reason ARIN can't be used? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 17, 2015 10:18 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote: IIRC, the short answer why it wasn't repurposed as additional unicast addresses was that too much deployed gear has it hardcoded as reserved, future functionality unknown, do not use. Following an instruction to repurpose 240/4 as unicast addresses, such gear would not receive new firmware or obsolete out of use quickly enough to be worth the effort. More to the point, the amount of work required to fix all the existing equipment to handle 240/4 would not be a lot less than the work required to get it to handle IPv6, and it would only have pushed the IPv4 exhaustion out a few years. It was entirely reasonable to conclude that it would not have been a good use of anyone's time or money. Look at the bright side: you can use the money you didn't spend on 240/4 upgrades to buy slightly used IPv4 space on the grey market or CGN equipment. R's, John
Re: Google contact?
I was actually told July 6 or 9 in my email (which was delivered to that unmonitored mail box like you). I told customers July 1. We lost it June 9. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Shawn L sha...@up.net wrote: I'm replying on-list since it seems like a lot of people are in the same boat. Here's a summary of what happened to us. Please feel free to jump in if you had a different experience, or have more information. Google sent us a notice in December that as of June 8 they would be discontinuing the Google for ISPs program and that we had to find a different e-mail provider. Unfortunately, they only sent this notice to the account that initially created the service, which was un-monitored. I have heard the same thing from others. They did not include a notice about the discontinuation in their monthly billing, only in e-mail and only to the account that initiated the google service. We actually found out about it some time in February. I spoke with the Google contact listed in the e-mail and was told that they were indeed cancelling the service, but wasn't given a reason. We also asked if it was possible to move to a different Google service, Google Apps for Business for example, but was told that it would be against their terms or service and would result in a cancellation of the service. After a lot of research in Google's forums, it looked like a lot of other people were in the same boat we were. We ended up talking with another e-mail provider and migrating all of our mail. Several weeks ago we asked Google for an extension because the migration was taking longer than expected. We were given until the 16th of June and told that no further extensions would be given. I have spoken to one person who was given until the end of June. Here is the original notice we received from google. I hope this helps others in the same boat December 10, 2014 [ your-domain,com ]( http://baragatelephone.com ) Subject: Notice of Non-Renewal of The Google Apps - ISP Partner Edition Agreement. Dear Administrator, Thank you for being a Google customer and for using Google Apps Partner Edition (collectively, Partner Edition). As part of Google's integration plans, we have elected to discontinue providing the Partner Edition Services going forward. As provided in the Agreement between Google Inc. and [ your-domain.com ]( http://baragatelephone.com ), this letter serves as your formal notice that the Services will not be renewed, and our Agreement with you will terminate on June 8, 2015. Any other Google services you have purchased (or resold, if applicable), in addition the Partner Edition product and services, will not be affected by this change. Please also note that this notice of non-renewal does not relieve you of any payment obligations you may have under the current Agreement and that you remain responsible for remitting any such owed payments in full by the applicable invoice due date for the Services. We have prepared an Administrator transition resource website ([ https://support.google.com/appstransition/go/admin ]( https://support.google.com/appstransition/go/admin )) and an End User resource website ([ https://support.google.com/appstransition ]( https://support.google.com/appstransition )) to assist you through the transition. This resource center presents some of the migration options available to you and provides instructions that you can share with your customers. We regret any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you again for your business. If you have any questions, please contact your Account Manager below. Account Manager: John Coull Phone Number: [ 212- 565-3131 ]( tel:212-%20565-3131 ) Email Address: [ joh...@google.com ]( mailto:joh...@google.com ) Sincerely, Omid Kordestani Chief Business Officer -Original Message- From: Marciano Lopes marciano.lo...@gsurfnet.com Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:48am To: Shawn L sha...@up.net Subject: Re: Google contact? Hello Shawn! They cancelled ours as well. What we can do? Thanks! Atenciosamente, Marciano Lopes GSURF Fixo (48) 3254-8700 Ramal 6272 Móvel (48) 9125-5081 Atendimento 24h 0800-644-4833 2015-06-17 12:15 GMT-03:00 Shawn L [ sha...@up.net ]( mailto: sha...@up.net ): Google cancelled their ISP program as of the 8th of June. Feel free to contact me off-list for more info. They cancelled ours as well. -Original Message- From: Christopher Tyler [ ch...@totalhighspeed.net ]( mailto: ch...@totalhighspeed.net ) Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 9:28am To: [ nanog@nanog.org ]( mailto:nanog@nanog.org ) Subject: Google contact? Need some help.. Does anyone have an email contact at Google that they are willing to pass along? All of our [ mowisp.net ]( http://mowisp.net ) Apps
Re: Hardware monitoring
Xymon Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 13, 2015 10:51 PM, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote: Hi everyone, I know this is slightly off-topic, but since it's still related to the list, I thought I'd give it a try. I am wondering what systems are out there (open source, preferably) for data collection and processing of hardware health data (temperature, CPU clock, fan speeds, etc). Ideally brand agnostic and location agnostic as well. I know of Cacti, but it would require SNMP enabled devices AFAIK, so room/generator/misc monitors wouldn't necessarily be included. Thanks in advance. Rafael
Re: Access to nanog.cluepon.net
Hasn't been working for about 20 minutes or more for me as well. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote: I'd like to update some material on nanog.cluepon.net (not very responsive to HTTP requests right now) and my account doesn't work anymore. I reached out to Richard S. but have not heard back from him - anyone else here who has admin access and can set me up again? Frank
Re: 192.0.1.0/24?
No one? http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-192-0-0-0-0/pft http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28692406-Outgoing-traffic-to-192.0.1.0-port-1000- Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Harley H bobb.har...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone know the status of this netblock? I've come across a malware sample configured to callback to an IP in that range but it does not appear to be routable. Yet, it is not mentioned in RFC 5735 nor does it have any whois information. Thanks, Harley
Re: RFC 7511 - Scenic Routing for IPv6
The pigeon one is still my favorite, too. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Stephen Satchell l...@satchell.net wrote: I'm sorry, packets are for the birds. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2549 On 04/01/2015 04:35 PM, Gary Wardell wrote: My packets prefer owls. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Maufer Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 7:15 PM To: Jeff Walter; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: RFC 7511 - Scenic Routing for IPv6 All my packets use recycled electrons. And recycled photons. Conservation of Energy isn't just a green idea...it's the LAW. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:02 PM Jeff Walter jwal...@weebly.com wrote: I only buy free-ranged packets and you should too. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:28 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:18:42 -0400, Sadiq Saif said: Informational of course. :) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7511 It already has an errata filed. Follow the link. :)
Re: FIXED - Re: Broken SSL cert caused by router?
When I had the same mistake as you, that toll identified it. That's why I mentioned that one :) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 27, 2015 12:34 PM, Mike mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 08:43 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: FFR you can use this to verify the site itself is good or not: https://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html (there are others, this is just what I have bookmarked) Thanks. Previously while diagnosing this however, I used some others similar and they all were saying I was ok. For example, https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html and one other I forget now. I am surprised this problem was not being pointed out.
Re: FIXED - Re: Broken SSL cert caused by router?
FFR you can use this to verify the site itself is good or not: https://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html (there are others, this is just what I have bookmarked) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Mike mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: I'd like to thank everyone for their kind responses. One person who responded off list and bothered to look at the returned certificates pointed out, and correctly it seems, that my original setup was missing an intermediate certificate. The site was returning 'valid ssl' and all browsers got the green lock and offsite ssl tests came back ok, but apparently the missing intermediate means it would have had to have been fetched and that was the part that was failing at the customer site. Once I put the intermediate certificate in there, the customer site was able to access https without fail. I have not had an opportunity yet to examine in detail the config of the meraki router there but it's either a routing problem or a DPI problem. If I get an answer I'll post again with my results. Thanks all. Mike-
Re: FCC form 477 geocoding
Did you do actual coordinates or just click the link? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 3, 2015 6:50 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote: --- tethe...@shwisp.net wrote: From: Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net Lat/Lng to Census Block via FCC http://data.fcc.gov/api/block/2010/find?latitude=$latitudelongitude=$longitudeshowall=trueformat=JSON -- HTTP Status 404 - Not Found type Status report message Not Found description The requested resource (Not Found) is not available. Apache Tomcat/6.0.30 scott
Re: FCC form 477 geocoding
Assuming you have LAT/LONG you can use the FCC API: http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/form-477-census-tract-information You also need to provide your coverage. I suggest Towercoverage.com for that, though you may not be a WISP. Non-wireless I'm not sure how you'd go about it. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote: The CFO here is working on FCC form 477 and tells me that he needs to enter census tract and block information for our customers. He says that the US Census site is worse than useless and the info isn't on the FCC site. What are others doing in this regard? -- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
Re: FCC form 477 geocoding
Well you'll need to translate those into addresses. That should be easy with Google or Bing. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 3, 2015 5:57 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote: On 3/3/15 14:44, Josh Luthman wrote: Assuming you have LAT/LONG you can use the FCC API: http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/form-477-census-tract-information You also need to provide your coverage. I suggest Towercoverage.com for that, though you may not be a WISP. Non-wireless I'm not sure how you'd go about it. Non-wireless, we have street address and zip codes, not lat/long. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
Re: FCC form 477 geocoding
Use Sam's suggestions. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 3, 2015 6:18 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net wrote: Address to lat/lng using google api http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json?address= $addresssensor=true Lat/Lng to Census Block via FCC http://data.fcc.gov/api/block/2010/find?latitude=$latitude; longitude=$longitudeshowall=trueformat=JSON On 03/03/2015 05:06 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: On 3/3/15 14:59, Josh Luthman wrote: Well you'll need to translate those into addresses. That should be easy with Google or Bing. We have the addresses, need census tract and block. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
Re: Gmail slow?
I'm on Google Apps and gmail.com (personal). Web interface, assuming that's what you're talking about. No problems from here. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote: We are getting many complaints demo diverse networks on both coasts that Gmail is very sluggish, sometimes taking a 20 to 30 seconds to refresh the mail items list. Is anyone else seeing this? -mel beckman Becknet.com
Re: gmail spam help
Create a filter. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 12, 2015 8:11 AM, Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net wrote: Is there anyone on-list that can help me with a world - gmail email issue, where email is being considering spam by gmail erroneously? Thanks.
Re: Comcast Static IP Changed With New Modem?
With Time Warner Cable in my region that is expected 100% of the time. Every single cable modem replacement requires you to initialize the static IP configuration. I expect the cable operators to operate similarly. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Justin Wilson - MTIN li...@mtin.net wrote: Seen this happen quite often with Comcast. They simply didn’t provision the new modem. A simple call to them should correct it. Done it two or 3 times in the past 6 months. Justin Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Justin Krejci jkre...@usinternet.com wrote: Has anyone run into the situation where their static IP address from Comcast (on the business class cable modem Internet service) was changed when the modem was replaced? We have a remote site that uses Comcast as a backup Internet connection and when we went to use it recently our VPN tunnel would not establish. After working with the Comcast support group we discovered Comcast changed our static IP address. I am working through trying to figure out the when and the why with Comcast still and suspect it was changed when the modem was replaced back in December. The modem was replaced by Comcast as our previous modem was apparently EOL'ed. We're now setting up additional monitoring to verify the accessibility of our remote site via the Comcast connection so we don't have any future uh-ohs when we need to use our backup connection and it too is not fully functional. TIA, -Justin
Re: gamer lag dashboard
IXIA would be the first product to look at as far as emulating traffic. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:16 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote: Emulating game traffic... Good luck with that. You'll probably have to figure it out and build your own models per service, though a lot is encapsulated in https. In terms of showing it to the public, look at Zabbix and Zenoss; both do dashboards and managing multiple realtime monitoring / performance info feeds well. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone On Jan 19, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Michael O Holstein michael.holst...@csuohio.edu wrote: ?Can someone point me in the right direction for something that allows creation of a dashboard with current and statistical latency to the various game servers (PC, Xbox, PS4, etc) ? .. I'm in the education space and we get lots of questions/complains about this and would like a way to make the stats public. I could roll something with RRD and Smokeping but with all the packet-shaping crapola (including that which we use here) I need something that emulates the actual game traffic as would be classified by all the network crap that endeavors to mess with it. (not intended to be an argument about QoS and prioritization, responses addressing either --or the politics thereof-- really aren't helpful). TIA, Michael Holstein Network Data Security Cleveland State University
Re: AS6713 (aka IAM / MOROCCO TELECOMS) peering contact
Just drop it guys...please? :) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 27, 2014 4:52 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl wrote: Isn't it better actually to use they? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they -- Grzegorz Janoszka On 2014-12-27 20:35, Clayton Zekelman wrote: That is why the better pronoun choice would have been 'you', not 'he' or 'she'. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 27, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Javier J jav...@advancedmachines.us wrote: What if they don't identify as a he or a she? On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Clayton Zekelman clay...@mnsi.net wrote: What if the peering team member is a she? Should she not contact you if so? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 26, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr wrote: Hello, If someone from IAM peering team is watching, could he please get in touch OFF-list please ? Best regards. -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
Re: in-case anyone is interested, the pirate flag flies again.
They're all mirrors (old backups) besides thepiratebay.se Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Yucong Sun sunyuc...@gmail.com wrote: CR one is fake, isn't it? On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicolás nfiumare...@lacnic.net wrote: You could try this one: https://thepiratebay.cr/ El 22/12/14 00:28, Miles Fidelman escribió: Javier J wrote: http://www.thepiratebay.se/ Doesn't seem to be reachable, though.
Re: OT - Verizon/ATT Cell/4G Signal Booster/Repeater
Definitely not. My Droid Maxx on VZW does not do Wifi calling. I have yet to see Wifi calls (excluding SIP clients and such) on any phone around here. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net wrote: I just with Wifi calling was ubiquitous. isn't it in every android phone since ~1yr ago?
Re: OT - Verizon/ATT Cell/4G Signal Booster/Repeater
Call Wilson. Explain what you want you do. They'll give you a product number. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 15, 2014 9:46 PM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote: Hi all; Looking to improve cell reception for mixed ATT/Verizon users on the first floor of one of our buildings. Starting to dig into this and coming across items like this one at Amazon[1], but thought some of you out there might have recommendations for something that has worked well for you and has been reliable. Am in a position to run cable from the roof to the floor in question. Thanks, Ray [1] http://www.amazon.com/Wilson-Electronics-Indoor-Cellular-Booster/dp/B00IWW9AB8/ref=lp_2407782011_1_1?s=wirelessie=UTF8qid=1418671553sr=1-1
Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house
I would have to expect they're doing a virtual SSID which means 0 additional wattage. Worst case scenario it adds another radio of less than 5 watts of which is absolutely negligible if you're able to afford cable Internet service. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: While I generally support the lawsuit, I have to question a vast burden on their electric bill. Does an 802.11 transmitter that was already being used to support their own WiFi network that they are paying for really consume vastly more electricity to support a second SSID? In my experience, that claim is hard to fathom. Owen On Dec 10, 2014, at 18:35 , Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote: Why am I not surprised? Whose fault would it be if your comcast installed public wifi would be abused to download illegal material or launch a botnet, to name some random fun one could have on your behalf. :-/ (apologies if this was posted already, couldn't find an email about it on the list) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/10/disgruntled_customers_lob_sueball_at_comcast_over_public_wifi/ A mother and daughter are suing Comcast claiming the cable giant's router in their home was offering public Wi-Fi without their permission. Comcast-supplied routers broadcast an encrypted, private wireless network for people at home, plus a non-encrypted network called XfinityWiFi that can be used by nearby subscribers. So if you're passing by a fellow user's home, you can lock onto their public Wi-Fi, log in using your Comcast username and password, and use that home's bandwidth. However, Toyer Grear, 39, and daughter Joycelyn Harris – who live together in Alameda County, California – say they never gave Comcast permission to run a public network from their home cable connection. In a lawsuit [PDF] filed in the northern district of the golden state, the pair accuse the ISP of breaking the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and two other laws. Grear – a paralegal – and her daughter claim the Xfinity hotspot is an unauthorized intrusion into their private home, places a vast burden on electricity bills, opens them up to attacks by hackers, and degrades their bandwidth. Comcast does not, however, obtain the customer's authorization prior to engaging in this use of the customer's equipment and internet service for public, non-household use, the suit claims. Indeed, without obtaining its customers' authorization for this additional use of their equipment and resources, over which the customer has no control, Comcast has externalized the costs of its national Wi-Fi network onto its customers. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages for themselves and on behalf of all Comcast customers nation-wide in their class-action case – the service was rolled out to 20 million customers this year. -- Earthquake Magnitude: 4.8 Date: 2014-12-10 22:10:36.800 UTC Date Local: 2014-12-10 13:10:36 PST Location: 120km W of Panguna, Papua New Guinea Latitude: -6.265; Longitude: 154.4004 Depth: 35 km | e-quake.org
Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house
Not correct. If it's on one radio it's using the same RF space it was before, just with a virtual SSID. Just like the atheros or Ruckus stuff - it's the same RF space with an additional BSSID bridged to a different software bridge or pseudo interface. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:41:24 -0500, Livingood, Jason jason_living...@cable.comcast.com wrote: ...But 2.4GHz was a bit of a mess before we came along with this service. So, knowing the house is on fire, you bring a can of gas to put it out. You aren't f'ing helping. Of course, since Comcast didn't spring for separate radios, it'll be riding what ever channel the customer's WiFi is using. Thus, interfering with *their* use of WiFi.
Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138
Works for me Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Javier J jav...@advancedmachines.us wrote: Name: thepiratebay.se Address: 194.71.107.27 Its reachable from some places and not others. Is it being filtered? Is it being hijacked? Email to them bounced from google apps. Are we now officially living in a police state? mtr dies at hop 2 for me: 2. l100.nwrknj-vfttp-134.verizon-gni.net ( 173.70.26.1 ) Is verizon now censoring the internet for me?
Re: It's 7pm. Do you know where *your* domains are? (was Re: Craigslist hacked?)
Xymon has a built in test to check SSL cert expiration. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 24, 2014 7:14 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: In light of the CL domain hijacking, it seems like a good time to ask if everyone has an inventory system that keeps track of all the details (including renewal dates) for their domain registy and SSL certificate accounts. If you use a tool to keep track of this, which one? Do you have things set up in your monitoring system to watch for changes in this stuff? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Re: Craigslist hacked?
I get the favicon.ico but Chrome says Error code: ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote: I did a cache flush at googledns and it started resolving to a different IP than the one earlier. Thinking the DNS may have been compromised somewhere. New IP is 208.91.197.27 old one was 74.63.219.135 On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ken Chase m...@sizone.org wrote: down for me and http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/craigslist.org /kc On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:45:35PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said: Comes up normal for me in LA, on twc. On Nov 23, 2014 7:43 PM, Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um. -- Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Toronto Canada
Re: Incident notification
Pagerduty for phone calls. Can do SMS as well, I believe. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Thijs Stuurman thijs.stuur...@is.nl wrote: Nanog list members, I was looking at some statistic and noticed we are sending out a massive amount of SMS messages from our monitoring systems. This left me wondering if there isn't a better (and cheaper) alternative to this, something just as reliant but IP based. We all have smartphones these days anyway. Therefore my question, what are you using to notify admins of incidents? Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Thijs Stuurman [IS Logo] IS Group Wielingenstraat 8 T +31 (0)299 476 185 i...@is.nlmailto:i...@is.nl 1441 ZR Purmerend F +31 (0)299 476 288 www.is.nlhttp://www.is.nl IS Group is ISO 9001:2008, ISO/IEC 27001:2005, ISO 20.000-1:2005, ISAE 3402 certified. De datacenters zijn PCI DSS en ISO 14001 compliant.
Re: Need Godaddy Contact
It won't do anything to another server. You won't get copies of messages transferred with DNS changes. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 20, 2014 9:10 AM, Larry Krone la...@elucidations.net wrote: I have a question that Godaddy support will not answer. My son moved a word press site to Godaddy from another host. Apparently, unbeknowest to him, the original wordpress site was also the email host. The mail was moved from the old server to the new server but the email was never properly set up via the GoDaddy Cpanel Question for a Godaddy Guru. if we set up the email through the cpanel, will it erase any mail currently in the accounts on the linux wordpress machine, or even acknowledge that the exist email is there? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated and Thanks.. Larry
Re: Seeking VPS providers for low volume network probe
Ramnode is like $24 a year. They have a Netherlands cluster. I'm running CentOS6 and get both IPv4 and v6. They use OpenVZ for the really cheap stuff so depending on what you're doing you may run into issues. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Eric Germann ekgerm...@cctec.com wrote: Greetings, I'm looking for recommendations on a reliable VPS Provider(s) who can provide 1. Centos 6 2. IPv4 and IPv6 (preferably) physically in the regions of African Continent, Eastern Europe/Russia, Middle East, South America and Canada. I've already deployed some globally with Vultr and Amazon (Brazil region). Basically doing a low volume test point probe (512MB-1GB RAM, 20GB disk) for latency measurements. Would prefer to have a secure (logically and financially) and reliable host. Thanks in advance, EKG
Re: 4.2.2.2 4.2.2.21 High Packet Loss
Not really. From roughly 11:40 to 12:45 (Eastern) today there was some problem, but that's all I have. http://imgur.com/X6s58cz http://imgur.com/XGLe5Lm Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Emir Sosa emirs...@gmail.com wrote: Any one else experiencing high packet loss*; *Any word out there what's happening? *Regards,Emir sosaemirs...@gmail.com emirs...@gmail.com*
Re: ISP Shaping Hardware
Procera is probably the best product for real DPI. The key is the signatures. It matches everything so granular it's simply fantastic. Right down to what update you're grabbing for your iPhone. As was said, you'll be paying for it. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 21, 2014 1:00 AM, Carlos Alcantar car...@race.com wrote: The platforms I¹ve seen used for large scale dpi is procera I¹ve heard rave reviews, but also comes with the price tag. http://www.proceranetworks.com Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com http://www.race.com/ On 10/19/14, 9:55 PM, Skeeve Stevens skeeve+na...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote: Hey all, Just wondering what/if people are using any shaping hardware/appliances these days, and if so, what. I have a client which has thousands of customers on Satellite and needs to restrict some users who are doing a lot. So I wanted to see what the current popular equipment out there is. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve experts360: https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9 twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
