Re: blocking issues
Hi Sven I am away at the moment but I filed details as NETBEANS-1428 Let me know if you need more information Pete On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 18:09, Sven Reimers wrote: > Hi, > > crash of the IDE vm or the profiled application? Which jvm versions are > you using? Any other specialties? > > Thanks for detailing.. > > Sven > > Am 26.10.2018 15:00 schrieb "Peter Hull" : > > I got a repeatable JVM crash when profiling on Windows which I would > consider a major issue. > > Pete > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 17:51, Rodrigo Teixeira Andreotti < > ro.andrio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Me too! > > __ > > > > [image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png] > > > > > > Em sex, 26 de out de 2018 às 18:40, Josh Juneau > > escreveu: > > > > > I do not believe I found any blocking issues with JUnit or Profiler > > > testing. > > > > > > > > > Josh Juneau > > > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com > > > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a blocker > > at > > > > all. > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered > > > >> issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious > > issues? > > > >> Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being > comfortable > > > >> about 10.0 going out the door? > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > > > >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > > > >> > > > >> > - > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > >> > > > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
Re: blocking issues
Hi, crash of the IDE vm or the profiled application? Which jvm versions are you using? Any other specialties? Thanks for detailing.. Sven Am 26.10.2018 15:00 schrieb "Peter Hull" : I got a repeatable JVM crash when profiling on Windows which I would consider a major issue. Pete On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 17:51, Rodrigo Teixeira Andreotti < ro.andrio...@gmail.com> wrote: > Me too! > __ > > [image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png] > > > Em sex, 26 de out de 2018 às 18:40, Josh Juneau > escreveu: > > > I do not believe I found any blocking issues with JUnit or Profiler > > testing. > > > > > > Josh Juneau > > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com > > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > > > > > > > On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > > wrote: > > > > > > I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a blocker > at > > > all. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer > > > wrote: > > > > > >> This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered > > >> issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious > issues? > > >> Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being comfortable > > >> about 10.0 going out the door? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > > >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > >> > > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: blocking issues
I got a repeatable JVM crash when profiling on Windows which I would consider a major issue. Pete On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 17:51, Rodrigo Teixeira Andreotti < ro.andrio...@gmail.com> wrote: > Me too! > __ > > [image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png] > > > Em sex, 26 de out de 2018 às 18:40, Josh Juneau > escreveu: > > > I do not believe I found any blocking issues with JUnit or Profiler > > testing. > > > > > > Josh Juneau > > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com > > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > > > > > > > On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > > wrote: > > > > > > I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a blocker > at > > > all. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer > > > wrote: > > > > > >> This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered > > >> issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious > issues? > > >> Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being comfortable > > >> about 10.0 going out the door? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > > >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > >> > > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: blocking issues
Me too! __ [image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png] Em sex, 26 de out de 2018 às 18:40, Josh Juneau escreveu: > I do not believe I found any blocking issues with JUnit or Profiler > testing. > > > Josh Juneau > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > > > > On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a blocker at > > all. > > > > Gj > > > > On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer > > wrote: > > > >> This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered > >> issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious issues? > >> Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being comfortable > >> about 10.0 going out the door? > >> > >> -- > >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org > >> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >> > >> >
Re: blocking issues
I do not believe I found any blocking issues with JUnit or Profiler testing. Josh Juneau http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a blocker at > all. > > Gj > > On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer > wrote: > >> This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered >> issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious issues? >> Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being comfortable >> about 10.0 going out the door? >> >> -- >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org >> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists >> >>
Re: [editor] Appearance
Right now I have no other idea than, mark: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1344 as BLOCKER and add -J-Djdk.gtk.version=2.2 to the default command line parameters. It improves the UI on GTK+ LAF a lot, however still not perfect. It is going to be in 10.0 VC2. On 10/26/18 12:33 PM, Glenn Holmer wrote: On 10/26/2018 02:23 PM, Leo Donahue wrote: In my NetBeans 10.0-vc1 (GTK+), I don't see check box outlines, or radio buttons and on dialogs with scroll bars, those are also not visible (not shown in this screenshot). Apache NetBeans IDE Dev (Build incubator-netbeans-release-345-on-20181002) Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch) Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16 image.png Image didn't appear to make it through. Is it this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1344 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: [editor] Appearance
On 10/26/2018 02:23 PM, Leo Donahue wrote: > In my NetBeans 10.0-vc1 (GTK+), I don't see check box outlines, or radio > buttons and on dialogs with scroll bars, those are also not visible (not > shown in this screenshot). > > Apache NetBeans IDE Dev (Build incubator-netbeans-release-345-on-20181002) > Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch) > Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 > openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16 > > image.png Image didn't appear to make it through. Is it this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1344 -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
[editor] Appearance
In my NetBeans 10.0-vc1 (GTK+), I don't see check box outlines, or radio buttons and on dialogs with scroll bars, those are also not visible (not shown in this screenshot). Apache NetBeans IDE Dev (Build incubator-netbeans-release-345-on-20181002) Debian GNU/Linux 9.5 (stretch) Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16 [image: image.png]
Re: NetBeans 10.0vc2 is around the corner
Excellent news! Gj On Friday, October 26, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Dear all, > > There were a bunch of changes landed in our release branch. > I'm going to cut another VC on Sunday night (It would be Monday morning in > Europe) > > I'd love to ship the new Windows Launchers as well, but I'm not going to > delay the VC due to that. > > > Be prepared! > > Laszlo Kishalmi > > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >
Re: blocking issues
I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a blocker at all. Gj On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer wrote: > This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered > issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious issues? > Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being comfortable > about 10.0 going out the door? > > -- > Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > >
blocking issues
This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious issues? Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being comfortable about 10.0 going out the door? -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: NetBeans 10.0vc2 is around the corner
On 10/26/2018 11:42 AM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > There were a bunch of changes landed in our release branch. > I'm going to cut another VC on Sunday night (It would be Monday morning > in Europe) NetCATters, if you have a "pet bug" that you are watching, please make sure and get this build to do a quick check if your issue persists. If a reported issue is no longer valid, please speak up here on the list so it can be removed from the test cases. Here are some quick statistics comparing to previous NetCATs: 8.2 full testing: 58.2% complete, 89.1% passed 9.0 full testing: 88.7% completed, 92.6% passed 10.0 full testing: 63.5% completed, 91.3% passed -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Resolving previously failed test cases
On 10/26/2018 11:39 AM, Leo Donahue wrote: > Basically I was just asking in general what to do with the existing JIRA > which is documented on a previous NetBeans release. More specifically, > "resolve" or "close"? > > By April of 2019 will anyone care about the JIRA bug documented against > NetBeans 9? > To me, it seems like the issue should be resolved or closed against the > same code base used when the bug was filed. But issues may persist from version to version. If an issue was raised against 9 and it's still there in 10, it's still valid. Most of the issues I just went through and removed were marked "resolved fixed" in the old Bugzilla several years ago. > Maybe this is more of a JIRA topic that can be discussed and recorded for > those of us who are in different time zones? Or put some NetCAT JIRA > guidelines on the wiki? Yes, I think we can be a lot clearer about instructions for the next NetCAT. There's also much to be learned about how Synergy works. Testers should not only go through the test cases, but look at existing issues to see if they're still valid. I ran across some from the old Bugzilla that were still open or had been re-opened. There should probably be a discussion about whether to re-enter those as bugs in JIRA. -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Possible to add smooths scrolling to NB 10.0?
Dear all, As there was no objection, I'm going to cherry pick the smooth scrolling into our release100 branch. On 10/22/18 9:21 AM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: Hi NetCat Team! What do you say about this? Talking with Geertjan we are about to cut another VC at the end of this week or early next week. That one is going to have the new Windows Launchers as well. On 10/15/18 5:04 PM, Glenn Holmer wrote: Hello NetCATters, If you haven't seen it, this came up on the dev list: On 10/15/2018 11:17 AM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: The real question is how it is affect the current NetCat process. If the NetCat people fine with this cherry pick, then I'm good to go with this. Can the people who've completed some editor testing have a look and make sure this doesn't introduce any regressions? And those who reviewed the test spec, does this need any additional wording to verify that the feature works properly? The JIRA link below explains what's being changed. On 10/15/2018 03:12 AM, Christian Lenz wrote: in General I thought, that this feature: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-49 went into the NB 10.0 branch but it didn’t. Is it possible to cherry pick it anyway to bring it up into NB 10.0 or not? Here is the PR for it: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/881 it was still merged so it Needs a Cherry Pick. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
NetBeans 10.0vc2 is around the corner
Dear all, There were a bunch of changes landed in our release branch. I'm going to cut another VC on Sunday night (It would be Monday morning in Europe) I'd love to ship the new Windows Launchers as well, but I'm not going to delay the VC due to that. Be prepared! Laszlo Kishalmi Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Resolving previously failed test cases
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:32 AM Glenn Holmer wrote: > On 10/26/2018 02:55 AM, Leo Donahue wrote: > > Question: > > If a test case passes in 10.0-vc1 but there was a bug report for this > test > > case in NetCAT 9.0 testing, how should I handle the JIRA? > > > > This issue did not occur in 10.0-vc1 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-558 > > I'm not sure if users without admin privileges can remove an issue from > a test, but I'm making a second pass through all of them to make sure > the numbers are valid, and to remove those issues marked "resolved > fixed". This should make it easier for the devs, as they can just click > the issue numbers to check the reports. If anybody thinks that's a bad > idea, please speak up! > > Looking at 558, it looks like you originally filed it, so you can go to > JIRA and close it... > if it no longer applies. Basically I was just asking in general what to do with the existing JIRA which is documented on a previous NetBeans release. More specifically, "resolve" or "close"? By April of 2019 will anyone care about the JIRA bug documented against NetBeans 9? I will be thinking to myself.. should I resolve or close this or wait... It may still be a problem on a different environment. Who decides what is resolved and when? To me, it seems like the issue should be resolved or closed against the same code base used when the bug was filed. Since I don't keep up with the DEV side of NetBeans, maybe I should be, I don't know what has changed that would give me a passing test case in 10.0-vc1 (which would help me to know what to do with the JIRA). Ultimately, I don't want to document issues and then hope someone else figures them out. Maybe this is more of a JIRA topic that can be discussed and recorded for those of us who are in different time zones? Or put some NetCAT JIRA guidelines on the wiki? > The old NetBeans Bugzilla had > lots of stale issues, so let's keep our shiny new Apache JIRA tidy :) > > -- > Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) > "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." > > - >
RE: Verification for new PHP signature files
Everyone, I'm using NETBEANS 9.x and after she sits idle for a few hours, it hangs. I make a change and click SAVE and the IDE just sits there, doesn't resolve the save and I have to shut down the IDE. The garbage collection indicator isn't above 650.xx. When I open NBs 8.2x, the file I tried to save, has only a couple characters that I had typed as NBs 9.0 tried to save upon hanging. 8.2 seems stable and but the garbage collection gets up to 1400+ at times. When I click multiple times on that indicator, in both 8.2 and 9.0, nothing happens except that both IDES (8.2 is faster), lock up until the indicator value drops to a reasonable value. Thoughts? Peter Borreggine Owner and Developer Angular/Bootstrap/NodeJS/Databases/HTML5/CSS3/Responsive Web Design/SEO WebParity.net A Service Connected Disabled Veteran Owned Business WA State License: 603-501-609 360-830-8926 C “Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way…” - Lee Iacocca, former head of Chrysler and Ford This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message and its attachments. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. -Original Message- From: Junichi Yamamoto Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 8:36 AM To: netcat@netbeans.apache.org Cc: Tomáš Myšík Subject: Verification for new PHP signature files Hello NetCAT team, NetBeans has new PHP signature files now thanks to Tomas. Are there people who interested in them? (Could someone please test them?) They are used for code completion feature. They should contain more classes, functions, constants than before ;) It is available in a Jenkins build[1]. I generated them from the latest PHP manual. So I hope that they also contain documentation related to PHP 7.3. (but I'm not sure actually.) If there is no problem, we would like to merge changes[2] into the release branch. If there is a problem, please let me know. I'm going to create a PR for the release branch this weekend. [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/nbbuild/ [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/982 Thanks, Junichi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: tests needing volunteers
On 10/23/2018 07:29 AM, Walter Nyland wrote: > I've done quite a few now, they're fun and easy, and I'm learning a > lot of functionality I never knew about before. Please sign me up to > any that need to be done still. How about debugger breakpoints? I can add you to the debugger tribe if you have time to do this one. -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Resolving previously failed test cases
On 10/26/2018 02:55 AM, Leo Donahue wrote: > Question: > If a test case passes in 10.0-vc1 but there was a bug report for this test > case in NetCAT 9.0 testing, how should I handle the JIRA? > > This issue did not occur in 10.0-vc1 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-558 I'm not sure if users without admin privileges can remove an issue from a test, but I'm making a second pass through all of them to make sure the numbers are valid, and to remove those issues marked "resolved fixed". This should make it easier for the devs, as they can just click the issue numbers to check the reports. If anybody thinks that's a bad idea, please speak up! Looking at 558, it looks like you originally filed it, so you can go to JIRA and close it if it no longer applies. The old NetBeans Bugzilla had lots of stale issues, so let's keep our shiny new Apache JIRA tidy :) -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Resolving previously failed test cases
Question: If a test case passes in 10.0-vc1 but there was a bug report for this test case in NetCAT 9.0 testing, how should I handle the JIRA? This issue did not occur in 10.0-vc1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-558
