Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-22 Thread Michael Drake
In article 8ecaf06e53@abbeypress.net,
   Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote:
 Michael Drake  wrote on 7 Jul:
  Has anyone managed to submit a new bug report with NetSurf since
  SourceForge changed their site?

 Any upshot from this, Michael?

Noone replied, so I assume it doesn't work in NetSurf now.

I'll raise the issue when the developers meet on Aug 10th, if nothing's
been sorted out by then.

-- 

Michael Drake (tlsa)  http://www.netsurf-browser.org/



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-21 Thread Jim Nagel
Michael Drake  wrote on 7 Jul:
 Has anyone managed to submit a new bug report with NetSurf since
 SourceForge changed their site?

Any upshot from this, Michael?

-- 
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-11 Thread Jim Nagel
Richard Porter  wrote on 5 Jul:

 On 5 Jul 2013 Jim Nagel  wrote:
 And, while on the subject of Sourceforge, does its print really need
 to be so tiny, given the acres of white space?  And does the print
 need to be grey rather than black?  (Is this grey a current fashion
 among website designers or is it my eyesight?!?  If grey, I presume it
 is controlled by something in CSS.)

 That sort of thing is annoying. I like Oregano's option to disable
 Use document colours. Pity we haven't got something similar in NS. I
 probably raised it as a feature request in the dim and distant past.

I have confirmation from somebody who knows more about CSS than I do:  

 Yeah, most text color seems to be set to #55 or #5e5e5e.

So the tiny text on the Sourceforge page IS grey.  The unanswerable 
question then is:  For pity's sake, Why?

I also asked him:   Is there something in the Sourceforge CSS that 
prevents linelength from changing when the window is resized?

 The pages have fixed widths, so they're ignoring the width 
 of the browser window.

I had a good moan to him:   Tiny grey text amid acres of blank page is 
a real peeve, especially for people whose eyesight is no longer that 
of a 23-year-old.  And it seems to be a widespread fashion among 
web-designers for the past couple of years.  G.

 You could use a user stylesheet to override that kind of 
 thing if you like.


-- 
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-10 Thread Harriet Bazley
On 5 Jul 2013 as I do recall,
  Jim Nagel  wrote:

  Peter young wrote:
  Is there a way we can help the developers by reporting bugs now?

 Dave Lawton wrote on 5 Jul:
  You need to 'Login' [at Sourceforge], then you will find a 'Create Ticket'
  button has been added on the LHS.

 Did that.  Checked back an hour or two later, and my report is not
 listed on the bugs page at Sourceforge, so did it again.  Clicked
 Save (does that mean Submit?), and up comes this page*:
 www.archivemag.co.uk/JN/TEMP/NS-sourceforge.html

 Hardly helpful.  I already know I am logged in.  I want to know
 whether my submission has been successful or not.  I'm stymied.
 Less than user-friendly, imho.

 Perhaps Netsurf is not displaying the Sourceforge page correctly, and
 we are missing something vital?


Same here - I just tried to report a bug.  Clicking on 'Preview'
(cautiously, with Adjust) appeared simply to open a new blanked version
of the form, ticking the 'I would like to add an attachment' icon didn't
allow me to add an attachment (I hoped this might appear at a second
stage of the submission process, as it didn't do anything when initially
selected), and clicking on Save took me back to the log-in screen
without any new entry showing up in the list.   Page source is full of
JavaScript, but I can't tell how much of it is essential to
operation

It doesn't look as if Netsurf users are going to be reporting many bugs
using Netsurf.


-- 
Harriet Bazley ==  Loyaulte me lie ==

Dawn: The time when men of reason go to bed.



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-10 Thread Alan Sally

On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:23:20 +1200, Harriet Bazley 
li...@orange.wingsandbeaks.org.uk wrote:


On 5 Jul 2013 as I do recall,
  Jim Nagel  wrote:


 Peter young wrote:
 Is there a way we can help the developers by reporting bugs now?

Dave Lawton wrote on 5 Jul:
 You need to 'Login' [at Sourceforge], then you will find a 'Create Ticket'
 button has been added on the LHS.

Did that.  Checked back an hour or two later, and my report is not
listed on the bugs page at Sourceforge, so did it again.  Clicked
Save (does that mean Submit?), and up comes this page*:
www.archivemag.co.uk/JN/TEMP/NS-sourceforge.html

Hardly helpful.  I already know I am logged in.  I want to know
whether my submission has been successful or not.  I'm stymied.
Less than user-friendly, imho.

Perhaps Netsurf is not displaying the Sourceforge page correctly, and
we are missing something vital?



Same here - I just tried to report a bug.  Clicking on 'Preview'
(cautiously, with Adjust) appeared simply to open a new blanked version
of the form, ticking the 'I would like to add an attachment' icon didn't
allow me to add an attachment (I hoped this might appear at a second
stage of the submission process, as it didn't do anything when initially
selected), and clicking on Save took me back to the log-in screen
without any new entry showing up in the list.   Page source is full of
JavaScript, but I can't tell how much of it is essential to
operation

It doesn't look as if Netsurf users are going to be reporting many bugs
using Netsurf.



Same here, couldn't attach the logfile. Alan



Sourceforge

2013-07-07 Thread Michael Drake

Has anyone managed to submit a new bug report with NetSurf since
SourceForge changed their site?

-- 

Michael Drake (tlsa)  http://www.netsurf-browser.org/



Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Richard Porter
What's happened to Sourceforge? It's virtually unusable now. The help 
page tells me to click on Submit new but it's nowhere to be found on 
the bugs page.

-- 
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
  mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Peter Young
On 5 Jul 2013  Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:

 What's happened to Sourceforge? It's virtually unusable now. The help
 page tells me to click on Submit new but it's nowhere to be found on
 the bugs page.

I don't know if you're seeing the same thing as I am, but the URL 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=51719atid=464312
used to take you to the add a bug page (Can't remember what the 
correct name is), but it now takes you to the list of bugs instead. 
This has, as you say, no obvious way of adding a bug.

I did try this URL in Windows Firefox, and the same thing happens 
there.

Is there a way we can help the developers by reporting bugs now?

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter Young (zfc Ta) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Dave Lawton

On Fri, 5 July, 2013 12:03 pm, Peter Young wrote:
 On 5 Jul 2013  Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:

 What's happened to Sourceforge? It's virtually unusable now. The
 help
 page tells me to click on Submit new but it's nowhere to be found
 on
 the bugs page.

 I don't know if you're seeing the same thing as I am, but the URL
 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=51719atid=464312
 used to take you to the add a bug page (Can't remember what the
 correct name is), but it now takes you to the list of bugs instead.
 This has, as you say, no obvious way of adding a bug.

 I did try this URL in Windows Firefox, and the same thing happens
 there.

 Is there a way we can help the developers by reporting bugs now?

 With best wishes,

 Peter.

Hi,
You need to 'Login', then you will find a 'Create Ticket'
button has been added on the LHS.

HTH

-- 
Regards,
Dave Lawton
HTML emails are just a security risk, and nobody needs that.




Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Peter Young
On 5 Jul 2013  Dave Lawton li...@etcsystems.co.uk wrote:


 On Fri, 5 July, 2013 12:03 pm, Peter Young wrote:
 On 5 Jul 2013  Richard Porter r...@minijem.plus.com wrote:

 What's happened to Sourceforge? It's virtually unusable now. The
 help
 page tells me to click on Submit new but it's nowhere to be found
 on
 the bugs page.

 I don't know if you're seeing the same thing as I am, but the URL
 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=51719atid=464312
 used to take you to the add a bug page (Can't remember what the
 correct name is), but it now takes you to the list of bugs instead.
 This has, as you say, no obvious way of adding a bug.

 I did try this URL in Windows Firefox, and the same thing happens
 there.

 Is there a way we can help the developers by reporting bugs now?

 With best wishes,

 Peter.

 Hi,
 You need to 'Login', then you will find a 'Create Ticket'
 button has been added on the LHS.

So there is! I did try logging in to see if it made a difference, but 
didn't notice the Create ticket.

Presumably this means that people without a Sourceforge account can't 
submit bug reports any more, which is a pity,

At least they now have Save instead of that awful Add artifact!

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter Young (zfc Ta) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 12:52:51PM +0100, Peter Young wrote:
 Presumably this means that people without a Sourceforge account can't 
 submit bug reports any more, which is a pity,

At least we get identifying marks and a way to contact the author with every
bug report now though.

D.

-- 
Daniel Silverstone   http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged.Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Jim Nagel
Dave Lawton wrote on 5 Jul:

 You need to 'Login', then you will find a 'Create Ticket'
 button has been added on the LHS.

Maybe this useful info could be added to Netsurf's own help page --  
http://www.netsurf-browser.org/documentation/info -- which tells you 
how to report a bug.  (Is this page wiki-editable or is it only the 
Netsurf team who can do it?  A link direct to the relevant point in 
Sourceforge would be welcome.)

I've just finished floundering my way through the Sourceforge process 
before discovering this thread on the mailinglist.  Am still unsure 
whether my report got posted on Sourceforge or not or twice.  Its 
Preview button didn't give any reassurance.

And, while on the subject of Sourceforge, does its print really need 
to be so tiny, given the acres of white space?  And does the print 
need to be grey rather than black?  (Is this grey a current fashion 
among website designers or is it my eyesight?!?  If grey, I presume it 
is controlled by something in CSS.)


-- 
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk
 before emailing large files (1Mb), please ask me for FTP details
   See you at Kenilworth?   www.mug.riscos.org/show13   July 13



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Richard Porter
On 5 Jul 2013 Jim Nagel  wrote:

 And, while on the subject of Sourceforge, does its print really need
 to be so tiny, given the acres of white space?  And does the print
 need to be grey rather than black?  (Is this grey a current fashion
 among website designers or is it my eyesight?!?  If grey, I presume it
 is controlled by something in CSS.)

That sort of thing is annoying. I like Oregano's option to disable 
Use document colours. Pity we haven't got something similar in NS. I 
probably raised it as a feature request in the dim and distant past.

-- 
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
  mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Jim Nagel
 Peter young wrote:
 Is there a way we can help the developers by reporting bugs now?

Dave Lawton wrote on 5 Jul:
 You need to 'Login' [at Sourceforge], then you will find a 'Create Ticket'
 button has been added on the LHS.

Did that.  Checked back an hour or two later, and my report is not 
listed on the bugs page at Sourceforge, so did it again.  Clicked 
Save (does that mean Submit?), and up comes this page*:
www.archivemag.co.uk/JN/TEMP/NS-sourceforge.html

Hardly helpful.  I already know I am logged in.  I want to know 
whether my submission has been successful or not.  I'm stymied.
Less than user-friendly, imho.

Perhaps Netsurf is not displaying the Sourceforge page correctly, and 
we are missing something vital?


While we're on about Sourceforge, could someone already familiar with 
its workings please explain to us in the cheap seats what OpenID is 
all about?  This page says OpenID eliminates the need for multiple 
usernames across different websites.  Does that mean different 
Sourceforge websites or what?


*The tiny grey print in acres of blank space is a separate topick.

-- 
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk



Re: Sourceforge

2013-07-05 Thread Chris Young
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:22:09 +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:

 While we're on about Sourceforge, could someone already familiar with 
 its workings please explain to us in the cheap seats what OpenID is 
 all about?  This page says OpenID eliminates the need for multiple 
 usernames across different websites.  Does that mean different 
 Sourceforge websites or what?

It's an authentication system that works on any site that supports it.
 The idea is that you can choose your own OpenID provider, and use
that to log in on any website (well, as long as that website supports
OpenID).  It hasn't taken off in a big way, but it largely operates
(from a user perspective at least) the same as the log in with
Facebook, Log in with Twitter, Log in with my Google Account etc
buttons a lot of sites have.

I quite like the one on Sourceforge, as they used to force password
changes quite often, and logging in with an OpenID circumvented that. 
However, unless they've changed it recently, you can't actually log in
with an OpenID on Sourceforge if you're using NetSurf.

Chris



New sourceforge bug form completely unusable

2013-06-15 Thread Richard Porter
I am completely unable to add a comment to a bug report on 
Sourceforge. When I post the comment I get error 302 followed by 404 
if I click the link.

I wanted to reply to report 1453 - crash when closing window while 
page is loading.

I'm getting this too. I clicked Adjust accidentally and closed the 
resulting blank window. NetSurf crashed with a segmentation fault. I 
can supply a log if necessary, except that I can't attach it to 
someone else's bug report (and I can't do anything with the new 
Sourceforge interface).

-- 
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
  mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.



Re: Ctrl-arrow keys confused / Sourceforge

2013-02-17 Thread Jim Nagel
Steve Fryatt  wrote on 17 Feb:
 You've said this before; have you submitted a bug report?

Had nil response last time I said it.
Have put bug-report on Sourceforge page now.


(Sourceforge takes a little getting-head-round.  A feature request I
submitted some while ago was marked 5, which in the absence of any
explanation I took to mean 5 messages in the thread, but could not
figure out how to read the thread.  In fact I could not tell whether 
this item in the list was the feature request I had submitted or 
whether it was a similar idea from somebody else -- a lot of folks 
there seem to be called Nobody.)


-- 
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk



Re: Ctrl-arrow keys confused / Sourceforge

2013-02-17 Thread Peter Young
On 17 Feb 2013  Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote:

 Steve Fryatt  wrote on 17 Feb:
 You've said this before; have you submitted a bug report?

 Had nil response last time I said it.
 Have put bug-report on Sourceforge page now.


 (Sourceforge takes a little getting-head-round.  A feature request I
 submitted some while ago was marked 5, which in the absence of any
 explanation I took to mean 5 messages in the thread, but could not
 figure out how to read the thread.  In fact I could not tell whether
 this item in the list was the feature request I had submitted or
 whether it was a similar idea from somebody else -- a lot of folks
 there seem to be called Nobody.)

I think the 5 is a measure of priority, on a scale of one to ten. 
Five seems to be the default.

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter Young (zfc Ta) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Sourceforge passwords

2011-01-30 Thread Harriet Bazley
Wonderful... you can't use Netsurf to reset the Sourceforge passwords to
access the Netsurf bug tracker :-(
(Unless I'm missing something.)
https://sourceforge.net/account/registration/recover.php

-- 
Harriet Bazley ==  Loyaulte me lie ==

Questions are a burden to others, but answers are a prison for oneself.




Re: Sourceforge passwords

2011-01-30 Thread Richard Porter
On 29 Jan 2011 Harriet Bazley  wrote:

 Wonderful... you can't use Netsurf to reset the Sourceforge passwords to
 access the Netsurf bug tracker :-(
 (Unless I'm missing something.)
 https://sourceforge.net/account/registration/recover.php

I sent a message to their support email address and they initiated a 
password reset for me.

-- 
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
  mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.



Re: Sourceforge passwords

2011-01-30 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 29 Jan 2011  Harriet Bazley harriet.baz...@blueyonder.co.uk 
wrote:

 Wonderful... you can't use Netsurf to reset the Sourceforge passwords to
 access the Netsurf bug tracker :-(
 (Unless I'm missing something.)
 https://sourceforge.net/account/registration/recover.php

No you're not missing anything; I had to go to Windows to do this. The 
page seems to be stuffed with JavaScript.

With best wishes,

Peter.

-- 
Peter   \  /  zfc Lu \ Prestbury, Cheltenham,  Glos. GL52
and  \/ ____  \  England.
family   / /  \ | | |\ | /  _  \  http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/  \__/ \_/ | \| \__/   \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk



Sourceforge home page

2009-03-03 Thread Harriet Bazley
The Netsurf Sourceforge page http://sourceforge.net/projects/netsurf/
appears to be all but blank (the only visible links are to Summary,
Tracker and Download).   Exporting the page as text reveals that
there is in fact quite a lot of content there (including what is
presumably a link to Feature Requests, the section I was looking for!),
but I can't find any of the links even by the usual method of waving my
mouse pointer about over a seemingly-blank page.

-- 
Harriet Bazley ==  Loyaulte me lie ==

USER ERROR: replace user and press any key to continue.



Re: Sourceforge home page

2009-03-03 Thread Brian Howlett
On 3 Mar, Harriet Bazley  wrote:

 The Netsurf Sourceforge page http://sourceforge.net/projects/netsurf/
 appears to be all but blank (the only visible links are to Summary,
 Tracker and Download).   Exporting the page as text reveals that
 there is in fact quite a lot of content there (including what is
 presumably a link to Feature Requests, the section I was looking
 for!), but I can't find any of the links even by the usual method of
 waving my mouse pointer about over a seemingly-blank page.

I think you may not have waited long enough for the page to finish 
loading. IIRC you use a dial-up connection. Here, on 8Mb ADSL, it took 
about 2 minutes for the Sourceforge page to finish loading and 
display.

I tested it on Firefox 3 on Windows, and it loaded much quicker, 
however there are large chunks of JavaScript which are used for a 
fancy tabbed display. I reckon NetSurf makes a decent fist of 
displaying such rubbish, but it is slow.

BTW, I heartily endorse your feature request... ;)
-- 
Brian Howlett
--
This place would be a paradise tomorrow, if every department had a
supervisor with a sub-machine gun.



Sourceforge down?

2008-04-30 Thread Richard Porter
I can't get any response from sourceforge.net this morning.

-- 
 _
|_|. _   Richard Porter   http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sourceforge down?

2008-04-30 Thread Richard Porter
On 30 Apr 2008 Dr Peter Young wrote:

 On 30 Apr 2008  Paul Vigay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a dim and distant universe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] enlightened us thusly:
 I can't get any response from sourceforge.net this morning.

 Nor can I. Just been trying to download the latest SquirrelMail, although I
 did successfully download NetSurf about half an hour ago.

 Seems to be there now.

You're lucky. I'm still not getting any response. It resolves but 
fails to connect to the server. Possibly an intermittent fault.



-- 
 _
|_|. _   Richard Porter   http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sourceforge down?

2008-04-30 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 10:30 +0100, Paul Vigay wrote:
 In a dim and distant universe [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] enlightened us thusly:
  I can't get any response from sourceforge.net this morning.
 
 Nor can I. Just been trying to download the latest SquirrelMail, although I
 did successfully download NetSurf about half an hour ago.

NetSurf downloads are not hosted on SourceForge, so it being down will
have no effect on your ability to download NetSurf.

The only thing we use SourceForge for is the bug tracker - and we're
working to replace that.

B.




Re: Sourceforge down?

2008-04-30 Thread dave higton
Quoting Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I can't get any response from sourceforge.net this morning.

I can't get any response from Slashdot either.  Is there some
commonality?

Dave



Re: Sourceforge down?

2008-04-30 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 11:44 +0100, dave higton wrote:
 Quoting Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  I can't get any response from sourceforge.net this morning.
 
 I can't get any response from Slashdot either.  Is there some
 commonality?

Slashdot, Sourceforge, Freshmeat, NewsForge and others are all owned by
the same organisation.  I imagine they've had some sort of networking
difficulty to take them all out of action.

B.