Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[Domen Kožar]

+1 for merging staging. I've created an issue to track merging progress:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/10925

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Domen Kožar  wrote:

> I've created an issue to document staging purpose at more accessible
> location: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/10915
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Pascal Wittmann 
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/09/2015 10:51 AM, zimbatm wrote:
>> > Is there a document that explains the rationale behind keeping a
>> separate
>> > staging area ? I don't understand nixos fully and it looks like it
>> would be
>> > more work than keeping the unstable channel to master.
>>
>> The idea is described in this thread:
>>
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/13447
>>
>>
>> ___
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>>
>>
>
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[Domen Kožar]

I've created an issue to document staging purpose at more accessible
location: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/10915

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Pascal Wittmann 
wrote:

> On 11/09/2015 10:51 AM, zimbatm wrote:
> > Is there a document that explains the rationale behind keeping a separate
> > staging area ? I don't understand nixos fully and it looks like it would
> be
> > more work than keeping the unstable channel to master.
>
> The idea is described in this thread:
>
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/13447
>
>
> ___
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
>
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[zimbatm]

Is there a document that explains the rationale behind keeping a separate
staging area ? I don't understand nixos fully and it looks like it would be
more work than keeping the unstable channel to master.

On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 19:49 Anderson Torres 
wrote:

> 2015-11-08 17:01 GMT-02:00 William Kennington :
> > Systemd 227 has been buggy at shutdown / restart for me, sometimes
> failing
> > to unmount some if the mount points. It doesn't happen on every restart
> so
> > ill have to see if i can find the cause. Just be careful rebooting remote
> > machines.
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:59 AM Rok Garbas  wrote:
> >>
> >> Quoting Luca Bruno (2015-11-07 14:42:02)
> >> > So we're back to the problem where staging is starting to diverge a
> lot.
> >> > Staging has not been merged since a couple of months at least.
> >> >
> >> > Is it possible to stop making big changes unless they are really
> needed
> >> > to fix
> >> > the staging build?
> >> >
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> are there any big blockers that need attention before we merge staging
> to
> >> master?
> >>
> >> from what have tested it works for my services. and i would love to get
> >> systemd
> >> 227 :)
>
> And I would love to get rid of it :) Maybe I need to study some more...
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si
> >> ___
> >> nix-dev mailing list
> >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
> >
> >
> > ___
> > nix-dev mailing list
> > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
> >
> ___
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[Pascal Wittmann]

On 11/09/2015 10:51 AM, zimbatm wrote:
> Is there a document that explains the rationale behind keeping a separate
> staging area ? I don't understand nixos fully and it looks like it would be
> more work than keeping the unstable channel to master.

The idea is described in this thread:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.nixos/13447



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[Anderson Torres]

2015-11-08 17:01 GMT-02:00 William Kennington :
> Systemd 227 has been buggy at shutdown / restart for me, sometimes failing
> to unmount some if the mount points. It doesn't happen on every restart so
> ill have to see if i can find the cause. Just be careful rebooting remote
> machines.
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:59 AM Rok Garbas  wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Luca Bruno (2015-11-07 14:42:02)
>> > So we're back to the problem where staging is starting to diverge a lot.
>> > Staging has not been merged since a couple of months at least.
>> >
>> > Is it possible to stop making big changes unless they are really needed
>> > to fix
>> > the staging build?
>> >
>>
>> +1
>>
>> are there any big blockers that need attention before we merge staging to
>> master?
>>
>> from what have tested it works for my services. and i would love to get
>> systemd
>> 227 :)

And I would love to get rid of it :) Maybe I need to study some more...

>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si
>> ___
>> nix-dev mailing list
>> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
>
> ___
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[William Kennington]

Systemd 227 has been buggy at shutdown / restart for me, sometimes failing
to unmount some if the mount points. It doesn't happen on every restart so
ill have to see if i can find the cause. Just be careful rebooting remote
machines.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:59 AM Rok Garbas  wrote:

> Quoting Luca Bruno (2015-11-07 14:42:02)
> > So we're back to the problem where staging is starting to diverge a lot.
> > Staging has not been merged since a couple of months at least.
> >
> > Is it possible to stop making big changes unless they are really needed
> to fix
> > the staging build?
> >
>
> +1
>
> are there any big blockers that need attention before we merge staging to
> master?
>
> from what have tested it works for my services. and i would love to get
> systemd
> 227 :)
>
>
>
> --
> Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si
> ___
> nix-dev mailing list
> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
>
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge

[Rok Garbas]

Quoting Luca Bruno (2015-11-07 14:42:02)
> So we're back to the problem where staging is starting to diverge a lot.
> Staging has not been merged since a couple of months at least.
> 
> Is it possible to stop making big changes unless they are really needed to fix
> the staging build?
> 

+1 

are there any big blockers that need attention before we merge staging to
master? 

from what have tested it works for my services. and i would love to get systemd
227 :)



--
Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si


signature.asc
Description: signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Vladimír Čunát]

On 05/10/2015 11:40 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
 It's ok for me except that then people won't have ready binaries for
 master, which is what staging was meant for.

At this moment I see we have binaries only for ~10k packages on master
and ~9k packages on staging, so the difference isn't that bad.

http://hydra.nixos.org/project/nixpkgs

Vladimir




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Domen Kožar]

Staging merged into master with --no-ff flag.

I'll stop the current staging jobset and start nixos-combined jobset.

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 05/10/2015 11:40 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
  It's ok for me except that then people won't have ready binaries for
  master, which is what staging was meant for.

 At this moment I see we have binaries only for ~10k packages on master
 and ~9k packages on staging, so the difference isn't that bad.

 http://hydra.nixos.org/project/nixpkgs

 Vladimir



 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Luca Bruno]

It's ok for me except that then people won't have ready binaries for
master, which is what staging was meant for. Hopefully master will build
fast and won't have those cached failures...

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, William Kennington will...@wkennington.com
 wrote:

 Lgtm

 On Sun, May 10, 2015, 03:21 Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I think we're ready to merge staging.

 Any objections? Current staging build failures are mostly because of
 cached kerberos failures.

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I'd just like to be clear: (everyone) please help us stabilize staging
 and let's not touch stdenv unless necessary until we merge current staging
 into master

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I'm trying to fix staging tests, they are quite broken and failing
 (kde4, installer, gnome3)

 See http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1192494#tabs-still-fail

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
  On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
  Because binaries of built staging are available only for that
 7f9ccc6
  commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
  think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
  does not agree with this merge, please reply.
  The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think
  there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master).
  Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds
 of
  failures (other platforms probably finished building).
 
  Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few
  weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are
 often
  detected days after being pushed.
 Domen offered to fix staging failures. Hopefully that will not delay
 staging merge by another month.

 Best regards,
 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev




 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev




-- 
NixOS Linux http://nixos.org
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[William Kennington]

Lgtm

On Sun, May 10, 2015, 03:21 Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I think we're ready to merge staging.

 Any objections? Current staging build failures are mostly because of
 cached kerberos failures.

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I'd just like to be clear: (everyone) please help us stabilize staging
 and let's not touch stdenv unless necessary until we merge current staging
 into master

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I'm trying to fix staging tests, they are quite broken and failing
 (kde4, installer, gnome3)

 See http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1192494#tabs-still-fail

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
  On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
  Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
  commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
  think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
  does not agree with this merge, please reply.
  The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think
  there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master).
  Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds of
  failures (other platforms probably finished building).
 
  Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few
  weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are often
  detected days after being pushed.
 Domen offered to fix staging failures. Hopefully that will not delay
 staging merge by another month.

 Best regards,
 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev




 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Domen Kožar]

I think we're ready to merge staging.

Any objections? Current staging build failures are mostly because of cached
kerberos failures.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I'd just like to be clear: (everyone) please help us stabilize staging and
 let's not touch stdenv unless necessary until we merge current staging into
 master

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote:

 I'm trying to fix staging tests, they are quite broken and failing (kde4,
 installer, gnome3)

 See http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1192494#tabs-still-fail

 On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
  On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
  Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
  commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
  think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
  does not agree with this merge, please reply.
  The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think
  there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master).
  Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds of
  failures (other platforms probably finished building).
 
  Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few
  weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are often
  detected days after being pushed.
 Domen offered to fix staging failures. Hopefully that will not delay
 staging merge by another month.

 Best regards,
 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev




___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Vladimír Čunát]

On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
 Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
 commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
 think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
 does not agree with this merge, please reply.

The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think
there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master).
Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds of
failures (other platforms probably finished building).

Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few
weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are often
detected days after being pushed.


Vladimir




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Luca Bruno]

On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
 On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
 Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
 commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
 think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
 does not agree with this merge, please reply.
 The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think
 there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master).
 Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds of
 failures (other platforms probably finished building).

 Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few
 weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are often
 detected days after being pushed.
Domen offered to fix staging failures. Hopefully that will not delay
staging merge by another month.

Best regards,
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Domen Kožar]

I'm trying to fix staging tests, they are quite broken and failing (kde4,
installer, gnome3)

See http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1192494#tabs-still-fail

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
  On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
  Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
  commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
  think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
  does not agree with this merge, please reply.
  The failure numbers look relatively good on 7f9ccc6, although I think
  there might be regressions in hundreds of packages (against master).
  Additionally, on darwin, trousers fail, which might create hundreds of
  failures (other platforms probably finished building).
 
  Staging development seems a bit too wild to me during the last few
  weeks; overloaded Hydra only makes it worse, as the problems are often
  detected days after being pushed.
 Domen offered to fix staging failures. Hopefully that will not delay
 staging merge by another month.

 Best regards,
 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge will soon happen

[Domen Kožar]

Staging and master are not building because of eval error:

error: access to path
‘/nix/store/x15ndrygbhxl7vaaxxq4b6f5wjmh4j96-nix-1.9pre4087_afa433e’ is
forbidden in restricted mode

Let's wait a few days until the bug is fixed (even if you merge staging
master won't evaluate).

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:

 The staging branch is now not polling for git changes anymore. Therefore
 the last evaluation will finish fast without other parallel builds, which
 is from 3 days ago. This kind of manual scheduling seemed to be working:
 http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/staging

 Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
 commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I think
 that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody does not
 agree with this merge, please reply.

 Merging staging is necessary because otherwise the development fork with
 master becomes too large with the time.

 After the evaluation completes, we'll evaluate a newer commit, and so on...

 Best regards,

 --
 NixOS Linux http://nixos.org

 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev


___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Staging merge imminent

[Shea Levy]

Merged.

 On Mar 19, 2015, at 5:55 AM, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 The latest staging evaluation (http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1176429 
 http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1176429) is nearly complete, barring any 
 objection I will merge that in to master tomorrow morning.
 
 ~Shea
 ___
 nix-dev mailing list
 nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
 http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev