[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
Denglong Zhou created OFBIZ-11029:
-
Summary: Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of
ProductWorker.java
Key: OFBIZ-11029
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: product
Affects Versions: 16.11.05, 18.12.01
Reporter: Denglong Zhou
{code:java}
//代码占位符
public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
variantProduct) {
if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
return null;
}
GenericValue virtualProduct =
ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
variantProduct.getDelegator());
if (virtualProduct == null ||
!"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
return null;
}
{code}
for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
{code:java}
//代码占位符
if (virtualProduct == null ||
!"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
{code}
thanks!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11028) field emplFromDate is forgot in PayHistory entity
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839171#comment-16839171 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-11028: - Thanks Olivier, I just made a quick review and it sounds good to me. I don't think we need anything about upgrading the DB since it's only an adding. I'll review deeper and test soon... > field emplFromDate is forgot in PayHistory entity > - > > Key: OFBIZ-11028 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11028 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: humanres >Affects Versions: Trunk, 17.12.01, 18.12.01 >Reporter: Olivier Heintz >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Labels: humanres > Fix For: Trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-11028.patch > > > A Employment can have multiple PayHistory and should have multiple > because PayHistory should show history of Pay for a employment ! > Currently, in PayHistory the field fromDate from Employment is confused with > fromDate about the current record, it's necessary to have a field > emplFromDate (to have the complete employment primaryKey). > Currently user interface for PayHistory is not working, when modifying a > PayRecord the current should be expire and a new one should be created. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pawan Verma reassigned OFBIZ-11029:
---
Assignee: Pawan Verma
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: 16.11.05, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Pawan Verma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pawan Verma updated OFBIZ-11029:
Attachment: OFBIZ-11029.patch
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: 16.11.05, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Pawan Verma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839209#comment-16839209
]
Pawan Verma commented on OFBIZ-11029:
-
Nice Catch, Yes it should be isVirtual instead of productId. Attached patch for
the same and also handled a NullPointerException for variantProduct.
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: 16.11.05, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Pawan Verma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pawan Verma updated OFBIZ-11029:
Affects Version/s: Release Branch 17.12
Trunk
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, 16.11.05, Release Branch 17.12, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Pawan Verma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839209#comment-16839209
]
Pawan Verma edited comment on OFBIZ-11029 at 5/14/19 8:41 AM:
--
Nice Catch, Yes it should be isVirtual instead of productId. Attached patch for
the same and also handled a NullPointerException for variantProduct.
I have also updated Affected Version(s).
was (Author: pawan.verma):
Nice Catch, Yes it should be isVirtual instead of productId. Attached patch for
the same and also handled a NullPointerException for variantProduct.
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, 16.11.05, Release Branch 17.12, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Pawan Verma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Sharma reassigned OFBIZ-11029:
-
Assignee: Aditya Sharma (was: Pawan Verma)
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, 16.11.05, Release Branch 17.12, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839223#comment-16839223
]
Suraj Khurana commented on OFBIZ-11029:
---
+1.
Patch looks good to me.
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, 16.11.05, Release Branch 17.12, 18.12.01
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Sharma updated OFBIZ-11029:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 18.12.01)
(was: 16.11.05)
Release Branch 18.12
Release Branch 16.11
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839737#comment-16839737
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-11029:
-
Thanks Aditya for changing the affected versions.
Pawan, though in this case it's obvious, in generarlwe never know when a bug
will be fixed. So, by and large, we use releases branches in affected versions
and not directly a release version.
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-11029:
Priority: Major (was: Critical)
Thanks for report Zhou,
This bug is major not critical. Critical bugs block releases by our
conventions. This should not block a release (even if I guess it will be
committed before next release).
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Major
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-10948) Convert DimensionServices.xml minilang to groovy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-10948: - Affects Version/s: Trunk > Convert DimensionServices.xml minilang to groovy > > > Key: OFBIZ-10948 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10948 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: bi >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Assignee: Pierre Smits >Priority: Major > Labels: Minilang, groovy, > > With the purpose to deprecate mini-lang OFBIZ-9350, convert > DimensionServices.xml -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-11030) Convert FactServices.xml minilang to groovy
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-11030: Summary: Convert FactServices.xml minilang to groovy Key: OFBIZ-11030 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11030 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: bi Affects Versions: Trunk Reporter: Pierre Smits With the purpose to deprecate mini-lang OFBIZ-9350, convert FactServices.xml -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839743#comment-16839743
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-11029:
-
Thanks Pawan,
Your patch looks good to me too :)
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Major
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840021#comment-16840021
]
Aditya Sharma commented on OFBIZ-11029:
---
Thanks Denglong Zhou for reporting the issue, Pawan Verma for the patch and
Suraj Khurana & Jacques Le Roux for the review
Fixed in
trunk r1859255
R18 r1859256
R17 r1859257
R16 r1859258
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Major
> Labels: product, variant
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Sharma closed OFBIZ-11029.
-
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Major
> Labels: product, variant
> Fix For: 17.12.01, 16.11.06, 18.12.01
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Resolved] (OFBIZ-11029) Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aditya Sharma resolved OFBIZ-11029.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 18.12.01
16.11.06
17.12.01
> Issue in function getVariantSelectionFeatures of ProductWorker.java
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-11029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11029
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: product
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Denglong Zhou
>Assignee: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Major
> Labels: product, variant
> Fix For: 17.12.01, 16.11.06, 18.12.01
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-11029.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0.25h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.25h
>
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> public static List getVariantSelectionFeatures(GenericValue
> variantProduct) {
> if (!"Y".equals(variantProduct.getString("isVariant"))) {
> return null;
> }
> GenericValue virtualProduct =
> ProductWorker.getParentProduct(variantProduct.getString("productId"),
> variantProduct.getDelegator());
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("productId"))) {
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> for the above coding, i guess the part colored by red should be the following,
> {code:java}
> //代码占位符
> if (virtualProduct == null ||
> !"Y".equals(virtualProduct.getString("isVirtual"))) {
> {code}
> thanks!
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5776) Move static resources from framework/images to framework/resources webapp
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840068#comment-16840068 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5776: HI Deepak, All, What is the situation here? > Move static resources from framework/images to framework/resources webapp > - > > Key: OFBIZ-5776 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5776 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Deepak Dixit >Assignee: Deepak Dixit >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-5776.patch > > > Move all the static resources form images webapp to resources webapp, as they > all are more related to resources rather then images. > Also we need to rearrange these resources based on their purpose, like > - Move all js related files and plugins under resources/js > - Move all the css related files and plugins under resources/css > - Move all the images related to js and css under resources/images or > resources/img -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10895) Unknown request [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840070#comment-16840070
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-10895:
-
Fixed in HR:
trunk r1859263
R18 r1859264
Not a problem in older branches
> Unknown request [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called
> directly.
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10895
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ecommerce, themes
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
>Priority: Minor
>
> This error happens in many occasions:
> Inside another request (here LookupProduct)
> {noformat}
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,215 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-2 |ControlServlet
> |T| [[[LookupProduct(Domain:https://localhost)] Request Begun,
> encoding=[UTF-8]- total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]]
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,222 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-7 |ControlServlet
> |T| [[[images(Domain:https://localhost)] Request Begun, encoding=[UTF-8]-
> total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]]
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,222 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-7 |ControlServlet
> |E| Error in request handler:
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
> [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:277)
> ~[ofbiz.jar:?]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:212)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:645)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:750)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:231)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53)
> [tomcat-embed-websocket-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ContextFilter.doFilter(ContextFilter.java:191)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlFilter.doFilter(ControlFilter.java:156)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpFilter.doFilter(HttpFilter.java:127)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:200)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:490)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:139)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:74)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:668)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:343)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:408)
> [tomcat-coyote-9.0
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10895) Unknown request [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840071#comment-16840071
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-10895:
-
BTW [we have a problem with "images" at
large|https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20text%20~%20%22images%22]
> Unknown request [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called
> directly.
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10895
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ecommerce, themes
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
>Priority: Minor
>
> This error happens in many occasions:
> Inside another request (here LookupProduct)
> {noformat}
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,215 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-2 |ControlServlet
> |T| [[[LookupProduct(Domain:https://localhost)] Request Begun,
> encoding=[UTF-8]- total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]]
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,222 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-7 |ControlServlet
> |T| [[[images(Domain:https://localhost)] Request Begun, encoding=[UTF-8]-
> total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]]
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,222 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-7 |ControlServlet
> |E| Error in request handler:
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
> [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:277)
> ~[ofbiz.jar:?]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:212)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:645)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:750)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:231)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53)
> [tomcat-embed-websocket-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ContextFilter.doFilter(ContextFilter.java:191)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlFilter.doFilter(ControlFilter.java:156)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpFilter.doFilter(HttpFilter.java:127)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:200)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:490)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:139)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:74)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:668)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:343)
> [tomcat-ca
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10518) Inventory (Supply) Allocation Planning
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840078#comment-16840078 ] Suraj Khurana commented on OFBIZ-10518: --- Improved condition in which reservation block was not being executed in case of auto-reserve not found in attribute. Done at rev #1859267 > Inventory (Supply) Allocation Planning > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-10518 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10518 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: order, product >Reporter: Deepak Nigam >Assignee: Suraj Khurana >Priority: Major > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: CreateAllocationPlan-Step1.png, > CreateAllocationPlan-Step2.png, CreateAllocationPlanEditMode-Step2.png, > EditAllocationPlan.png, FindAllocationPlan.png, OFBiz-10518-UI.patch, > OFBiz-10518-data.patch, OFBiz-10518-entity-model.patch, > OFBiz-10518-secas.patch, OFBiz-10518-services.patch, > OFBiz-10518-ui-labels.patch, OFBiz-10518.patch, OFBiz-10518.patch, > OFBiz-10518.patch, OFBiz-10518.patch, OFBiz-10518.patch, OFBiz-10518.patch, > ViewAllocationPlan.png > > > In the current implementation of inventory reservation flow, inventory gets > reserved for the order based on the reservation algorithm (FIFO, LIFO etc). > Many times, the fulfilment cycle of the order is too long or due to some > unexpected circumstances, the order holds the inventory for a long time. In > such scenarios, inventory availability becomes one of the major bottlenecks > in fulfilling the other sales order and businesses often remains short > supplied against the demand. > > We can provide a feature (Create, Find and Edit supply allocation screen) to > allocate the available and any future supply judiciously amongst existing > customers orders by considering different factors like estimated delivery > dates, order priority, customer preference etc. > > Following are the details design notes for the same: > > An order in the approved status will be considered as ‘Eligible for > Allocation’. The proposed supply allocation planning will have the following > set of features: > > *Create Allocation Plan:* > The authorized user will be able to initiate the process by setting the > desired product. > > *View/Edit Allocation Plan:* > 1) The system would search and list all the order lines which are eligible > for allocation for that particular product. > 2) The user can filter and sort the orders by various parameters like Sale > Channel, Customer, Order Id, Estimated Ship Date etc. > 3) The user can then prioritize the order by moving up or down the given > order in the priority ranking. Higher is the order in display result list, > higher will be the priority it would get during reservations. > 4) The user can set the ‘Allocated Quantity’ against ordered quantity at > order item line level. > 5) Once the Allocation Plan is submitted, the system would auto-assign the > priority and set the allocated quantity for each of the submitted orders to > be honoured during order reservations at any point in time. > 7) Incoming shipments would be reserved by honouring the same allocation plan > during order promising cycle. > 8) After allocating supply as per the allocation plan, any excess stock > should be reserved based on the standard FIFO method. > 9) If any of the items of an order is not planned via the Allocation Plan, > then also it should be reserved based on default FIFO criteria. > 10) The allocation for all the sales orders should be allowed for revision > unless the Shipment Plan is created against them. > > *Find Allocation Plan:* > The authorized user can search allocation plan(s) with filters like Plan Id, > Order Id, Product Id, Plan Method, Status etc. > > > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-10895) Unknown request [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840070#comment-16840070
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-10895 at 5/15/19 6:17 AM:
--
Fixed in HR:
trunk r1859263+r1859268
R18 r1859264+1859269
Not a problem in older branches
was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
Fixed in HR:
trunk r1859263
R18 r1859264
Not a problem in older branches
> Unknown request [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called
> directly.
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-10895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10895
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ecommerce, themes
>Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 16.11, Release Branch 17.12,
> Release Branch 18.12
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
>Priority: Minor
>
> This error happens in many occasions:
> Inside another request (here LookupProduct)
> {noformat}
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,215 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-2 |ControlServlet
> |T| [[[LookupProduct(Domain:https://localhost)] Request Begun,
> encoding=[UTF-8]- total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]]
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,222 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-7 |ControlServlet
> |T| [[[images(Domain:https://localhost)] Request Begun, encoding=[UTF-8]-
> total:0.0,since last(Begin):0.0]]
> 2019-03-31 12:32:26,222 |jsse-nio-8443-exec-7 |ControlServlet
> |E| Error in request handler:
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request
> [images]; this request does not exist or cannot be called directly.
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandler.doRequest(RequestHandler.java:277)
> ~[ofbiz.jar:?]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlServlet.doGet(ControlServlet.java:212)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:645)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:750)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:231)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53)
> [tomcat-embed-websocket-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ContextFilter.doFilter(ContextFilter.java:191)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.ControlFilter.doFilter(ControlFilter.java:156)
> [ofbiz.jar:?]
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpFilter.doFilter(HttpFilter.java:127)
> [javax.servlet-api-4.0.1.jar:4.0.1]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:200)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:490)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:139)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:74)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:668)
> [tomcat-catalina-9.0.16.jar:9.0.16]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-11031) Improve SalesOrderItemFact table
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-11031: Summary: Improve SalesOrderItemFact table Key: OFBIZ-11031 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11031 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: bi Affects Versions: Trunk, Release Branch 17.12, Release Branch 18.12 Reporter: Pierre Smits Improve the SalesOrderFactTable to include additional dimensions -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
