[ns] how receive CBR packets at my own agent????
Hi
I want to receive every CBR packets in my own agent and after extracting some
data from that, forward it to it's destination.
So in my agent constructor definition, I used from following code:
/**/
SBC2::SBC2() : Agent(PT_CBR) {
dup_flag_=0;
// set_pkttype(PT_CBR);
puts(SBC2::SBC2\n);
}
/**/
but It doesn't work and doesn't receive any packet. I tested PT_UDP and
PT_RTP too. what I must to do. Please help me. I have so little time.
with thanks: F.Akbari
Re: [ns] [VIP] Discussion
As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh From: Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the person who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks Mariam -- Best regards, Mariam Ahmed Moustafa Software Engineer, RD Department Integrated Solutions For Ports Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207 Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] [VIP] Discussion
Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh From: Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the person who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks Mariam -- Best regards, Mariam Ahmed Moustafa Software Engineer, RD Department Integrated Solutions For Ports Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207 Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion
I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition :) Jazak Allah kheran how can we set this rule?! is here admins? On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh From: Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the person who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks Mariam
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion
I agree with all of you! There are only 2 or 3 active users in this list. But I think that this problem is due to another problem that it's mandatory to solve: the stupid and trivial useless questions. For example, I've seen people asking again and again how to do something that you can just search in any simple tutorial. When I see someone like this, I never answer his questions, because he domonstrate that haven't search anything. By the way, I think this list is for more elaborate questions, so I answer that questions when I have the answer. Anyway, there's no simple way to solve our first problem, because we can dedice that it's our responsability to answer, but we're only a few. Nevertheless, I will answer the list (as usually I do) in order to improve our list! Regards! Leo Sánchez PS: sorry for my English, I'm not fluent and maybe some things could be misunderstood. El 13/08/2011 10:34, Mariam A. Moustafa escribió: I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition :) Jazak Allah kheran how can we set this rule?! is here admins? On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the person who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks Mariam
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion
Thanks Leo for your reply, the problem of the* trivial problem* may be due to they are newbies or even as u mentioned, in fact we couldn't control that, the asker of a trivial question will search the archiving, if find the answer then good else if any could answer good else he will find another way to find the answer. (the list will has a pool of silly questions consider them them noise) concerning the *elaborate questions* we need to keep their answers and this is the issue... I hope to have a list of famous* QA* for the trivial questions and a good organized (using tags) for the *elaborate* questions On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Leo Sánchez sanc...@ugr.es wrote: I agree with all of you! There are only 2 or 3 active users in this list. But I think that this problem is due to another problem that it's mandatory to solve: the stupid and trivial useless questions. For example, I've seen people asking again and again how to do something that you can just search in any simple tutorial. When I see someone like this, I never answer his questions, because he domonstrate that haven't search anything. By the way, I think this list is for more elaborate questions, so I answer that questions when I have the answer. Anyway, there's no simple way to solve our first problem, because we can dedice that it's our responsability to answer, but we're only a few. Nevertheless, I will answer the list (as usually I do) in order to improve our list! Regards! Leo Sánchez PS: sorry for my English, I'm not fluent and maybe some things could be misunderstood. El 13/08/2011 10:34, Mariam A. Moustafa escribió: I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition :) Jazak Allah kheran how can we set this rule?! is here admins? On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.**cateera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.**cateera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh __**__ From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary.mam@gmail.**comelansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the person who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks Mariam
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion
Hi, Adding to the Leo's point I would say that the main aim of this mailing list is to guide NS2 users and help them solve their problems that they are facing. It becomes very difficult when the students want their assignments and projects done by other people. I have had fair share of mercy appeals for such kindness, which I am not willing to do. Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems. -- Best Regards, Imran Khan Research Engineer Network and Service Architecture Lab Institute Telecom, Telecom SudParis, CNRS Lab UMR5157 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry, France +33 (0) 6 10 91 00 63 http://www.about.me/imrankhan1984 On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Leo Sánchez sanc...@ugr.es wrote: I agree with all of you! There are only 2 or 3 active users in this list. But I think that this problem is due to another problem that it's mandatory to solve: the stupid and trivial useless questions. For example, I've seen people asking again and again how to do something that you can just search in any simple tutorial. When I see someone like this, I never answer his questions, because he domonstrate that haven't search anything. By the way, I think this list is for more elaborate questions, so I answer that questions when I have the answer. Anyway, there's no simple way to solve our first problem, because we can dedice that it's our responsability to answer, but we're only a few. Nevertheless, I will answer the list (as usually I do) in order to improve our list! Regards! Leo Sánchez PS: sorry for my English, I'm not fluent and maybe some things could be misunderstood. El 13/08/2011 10:34, Mariam A. Moustafa escribió: I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition :) Jazak Allah kheran how can we set this rule?! is here admins? On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial suggestion and the subject is open for discussion.. what is about the person who ask the question and get a full and correct answer, S/he is the responsible to thank the list by forward the answer after it works. depending in the honesty on the memebers! what do you see?? Thanks Mariam
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion
Yes Imran, Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems. this is the point but if we cannot depend on morality, as Leo suggests the answers should be forward to all with a certain tag.. *No Individual answers*? with me? let's set the rule On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Imran khan imrankhan1...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Adding to the Leo's point I would say that the main aim of this mailing list is to guide NS2 users and help them solve their problems that they are facing. It becomes very difficult when the students want their assignments and projects done by other people. I have had fair share of mercy appeals for such kindness, which I am not willing to do. Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems. -- Best Regards, Imran Khan Research Engineer Network and Service Architecture Lab Institute Telecom, Telecom SudParis, CNRS Lab UMR5157 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry, France +33 (0) 6 10 91 00 63 http://www.about.me/imrankhan1984 On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Leo Sánchez sanc...@ugr.es wrote: I agree with all of you! There are only 2 or 3 active users in this list. But I think that this problem is due to another problem that it's mandatory to solve: the stupid and trivial useless questions. For example, I've seen people asking again and again how to do something that you can just search in any simple tutorial. When I see someone like this, I never answer his questions, because he domonstrate that haven't search anything. By the way, I think this list is for more elaborate questions, so I answer that questions when I have the answer. Anyway, there's no simple way to solve our first problem, because we can dedice that it's our responsability to answer, but we're only a few. Nevertheless, I will answer the list (as usually I do) in order to improve our list! Regards! Leo Sánchez PS: sorry for my English, I'm not fluent and maybe some things could be misunderstood. El 13/08/2011 10:34, Mariam A. Moustafa escribió: I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition :) Jazak Allah kheran how can we set this rule?! is here admins? On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces the askers not to rely entirely on anwerers. But again, NS2 mailing list exists on free-will only. We can't force people to do things (even if they are good things). In the end, it would be up to people on the list. Best, Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Fahimeh Akbari wrote: Hi every body (salam) I think It's completely true, but in another groups (like yahoogroup) the sender of e-mail is yahoogroup, so when we reply to e-mail it will forward to group, and then all it's users. I think it must be like that in ns-users group! with special thanks to mariam: Fahimeh From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com To: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:43 PM Subject: [ns] [VIP] Discussion Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS2 users, Shortly, in our archive we have a lot of questions and few of them are attached with thier answers!! Also as an open community we rely on the existance of expert and active persons.. due to the dynamic nature of this mailing list we need to arrange the process of asking and answering a question here is an initial
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion
Yes Itishi, you right post complete solution after getting help from other ns-users is the best solution but actually we couldn't depend on morality, so the guaranteed solution is to reply any answer for all, then the question will be attached with its pieces of answer... got me :) On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, itishi saxena itish...@yahoo.com wrote: I think it will be a good idea to post complete solution after getting help from other ns-users because I dont think setting rules will help people. sometimes you need answers urgently and you start typing instead of searching it anywhere. Still we can suggest people to write exact title and use technical term in the subject line so that it is easier for anyone to pick queries for answer. So I am also agree with Mariam. Regards, Ranjana -- *From:* Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com *To:* Imran khan imrankhan1...@gmail.com *Cc:* ns isi.edu ns-users@ISI.EDU *Sent:* Sat, 13 August, 2011 8:59:54 PM *Subject:* Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] [VIP] Discussion Yes Imran, Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems. this is the point but if we cannot depend on morality, as Leo suggests the answers should be forward to all with a certain tag.. *No Individual answers*? with me? let's set the rule On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Imran khan imrankhan1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Adding to the Leo's point I would say that the main aim of this mailing list is to guide NS2 users and help them solve their problems that they are facing. It becomes very difficult when the students want their assignments and projects done by other people. I have had fair share of mercy appeals for such kindness, which I am not willing to do. Having said that an organised NS2 mailing list is needed and every person should take moral responsibility of notifying on mailing list about the solution (s)he found for their NS2 problems. -- Best Regards, Imran Khan Research Engineer Network and Service Architecture Lab Institute Telecom, Telecom SudParis, CNRS Lab UMR5157 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry, France +33 (0) 6 10 91 00 63 http://www.about.me/imrankhan1984 On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Leo Sánchez sanc...@ugr.es wrote: I agree with all of you! There are only 2 or 3 active users in this list. But I think that this problem is due to another problem that it's mandatory to solve: the stupid and trivial useless questions. For example, I've seen people asking again and again how to do something that you can just search in any simple tutorial. When I see someone like this, I never answer his questions, because he domonstrate that haven't search anything. By the way, I think this list is for more elaborate questions, so I answer that questions when I have the answer. Anyway, there's no simple way to solve our first problem, because we can dedice that it's our responsability to answer, but we're only a few. Nevertheless, I will answer the list (as usually I do) in order to improve our list! Regards! Leo Sánchez PS: sorry for my English, I'm not fluent and maybe some things could be misunderstood. El 13/08/2011 10:34, Mariam A. Moustafa escribió: I totally agree with you, and adding a tag seems a very useful addition :) Jazak Allah kheran how can we set this rule?! is here admins? On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I agree. I would be great if we follow this guideline. I also have one more rule to add: Put a tag [NS-ANS: ] in front of the subject for the answer. Best Teerawat On Aug 13, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa wrote: As it is a free-will, we can agree on rules which enhance the asking process! we have two ways: 1- after his problem is solved the asker is responsible for forwarding the detailed answer (only one detailed full answer). 2- those who answered even if a partial answer, send the answer to all not in private. (so we will have many of partial answers by compiling them we can get the full answer). else this archiving is useless and becomes full of repeated questions with no answers! and if we lost the active members here, the list will die :) it is just a suggestion! Thanks all, Mariam On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca wrote: Hi, I think what Mariam means is to post the solved problem. Although, people use REPLY ALL to post the answer. We don't know whether the answer really solve the solution. As for me, most of the time, I only give a partial answer, leaving the askers something to think of by themselves. This forces
[ns] [NS- On/Off Server] Re: changing mu (service rate) for m/d/1 - by varying the defined mu
Hi and Salaam All Again... Just needed to notify that we solved by changing the dequeue() method of DropTail class. That is, to make the server on/off for certain periods, we stopped the dequeuing during the off period!!! HTH anyone looking for such answers On 12 August 2011 12:18, Amna Abdul Wahid amnaabdulwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All We are trying to turn the service rate of m/d/1 on and off, for certain periods. The code is attached herewith. We are facing the problem that although we change the $mu value in the ''sendpacket' method, the mu value taken by the simulation is the one we assign at the beginning. (the one supplied in $ns simplex-link $node_(r1) $node_(r2) $mu 10ms DropTail) Is there any simple way of changing this value (or the link state) during the simulation dynamically? Many Thanks in Advance for Any Help Amna, Sabri -- Regards, Amna Abdul Wahid
Re: [ns] [NS- On/Off Server] Re: changing mu (service rate) for m/d/1 - by varying the defined mu
great work and thanks for the notification :) On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Amna Abdul Wahid amnaabdulwa...@gmail.comwrote: Hi and Salaam All Again... Just needed to notify that we solved by changing the dequeue() method of DropTail class. That is, to make the server on/off for certain periods, we stopped the dequeuing during the off period!!! HTH anyone looking for such answers On 12 August 2011 12:18, Amna Abdul Wahid amnaabdulwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All We are trying to turn the service rate of m/d/1 on and off, for certain periods. The code is attached herewith. We are facing the problem that although we change the $mu value in the ''sendpacket' method, the mu value taken by the simulation is the one we assign at the beginning. (the one supplied in $ns simplex-link $node_(r1) $node_(r2) $mu 10ms DropTail) Is there any simple way of changing this value (or the link state) during the simulation dynamically? Many Thanks in Advance for Any Help Amna, Sabri -- Regards, Amna Abdul Wahid
[ns] NS-Users Q-process Guideline
Salam Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh, Dears NS-Users According to our discussion in the mail of a subject [VIP] Discussion, We agreed on these guidelines to effectively manage the question's process on this mailing list Here is the rules: (please mention, if I forget a thing) --- *1- To minimize the trivial question, the asker should search the archiving first to find the answer else if doesn't exist, kindly pay some efforts and time to google for the answer else send here!* * * *2- The answer of elaborated questions will be sent for the all user not only the asker with a tag [NS-ANS]* * * *3- Homework and college's assignment are prevented to be solved here, only if a guidance for a piece of work.* That's all, hope to follow these rules for good utilizing this list, and thanks a lot for all active members for participating in expressing this guideline. At the end, we would like to thank Mohit Tahiliani for start following the rules on his reply [ns] [NS-ANS]: how to change the node color with energy consumption Thanks dears, hope the best for all of you Mariam
Re: [ns] [NS-ANS] Issue with ns2 running with .tcl file with tracI interface
Hi, You need to start sumo server over the port which is specified in the tcl file. Once the server is running, then run your tcl file. Further information can be found here http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/sumo/index.php?title=TraCI -- Best Regards, Imran Khan Research Engineer Network and Service Architecture Lab Institute Telecom, Telecom SudParis, CNRS Lab UMR5157 9 rue Charles Fourier, 91011 Evry, France +33 (0) 6 10 91 00 63 http://www.about.me/imrankhan1984 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:46 PM, ketan telang ketan6...@gmail.com wrote: I patched ns2 with traci interface. It worked well. However whenever I run a .tcl file with traci client in it , i get error as num_nodes is set 33 Connect to TraCI server terminate called after throwing an instance of 'tcpip::SocketException' what(): tcpip::Socket::connect() @ connect: Connection refused what's going wrong here? Thanks
