Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
4-5-1, is thta what MM is playing now!!! so whats so absurd about that? On 25/10/2010 1:28 PM, Steven Millward wrote: That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === ===Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.(Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140)http://www.pctools.com=== -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
who???
On 25/10/2010 1:36 PM, Steven Millward wrote:
It's basically back to the old "two banks of five players"
that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have
won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now.
Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise?
On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au
wrote:
2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a
3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics
that.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
[sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I like that line-up.
Removes the main duds from our side (Ward,
Edwards, Craddock).
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick
after
watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a
better team for knocking the ball around instead
booting down field. as MM said in the interview
Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal.
I think regardlees of postion,
Sylvan Ebanks-Blake
Steven Fletcher
should be in the starting 11
drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van
Damme on in his place.
take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in
his place.
So my starting 11 would be
Marcus Hahnemann
Kevin Foley -
Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van
Damme
Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis
Sylvan
Ebanks-Blake
Steven Fletcher
Kevin Doyle
Just my thoughts,
Swampy
On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus
Chantry wrote:
Just in case you haven’t come across this on the
BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as
sharp as his interview skills…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm
The information contained in this email is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,
you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies.
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any
emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect
the views or opinions of Macquarie.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware
found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Everyone moans about Mick playing people out of position. You have two wingers playing as central midfielders and two strikers playing as wingers. Plus you have no defensive midfielder to break up play or win the ball. That's what's absurd. On 25 October 2010 20:15, Andy swamp...@tpg.com.au wrote: 4-5-1, is thta what MM is playing now!!! so whats so absurd about that? On 25/10/2010 1:28 PM, Steven Millward wrote: That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
where does it say in the rule book that you have to have a defensive midfielder? both SEB and Fletcher can cross the ball as good as any Wolves winger Hunt on the weekend when he came on had no speed about him to be thought of as a winger, (I know he's coming back from injury) and after watching the game I would play him in the center. iF I'm not mistaken Fletcher has come on and played midfield and made an impact, therefore striker or not I would play him at midfield. this formation with the players involved can be seen as 451 or 433 or 422, which ever way the situation needed it and which ever way you want to look at it. as far as moaning about MM playing folk out of position, thats his desicion for what ever game they have to play Wouldn't you if you were manager try and put the best players on the paddock regardless of what is next to their name, i.e fullback, midfield or forward??? Just my thoughts,!!! On 25/10/2010 8:35 PM, Steven Millward wrote: Everyone moans about Mick playing people out of position. You have two wingers playing as central midfielders and two strikers playing as wingers. Plus you have no defensive midfielder to break up play or win the ball. That's what's absurd. On 25 October 2010 20:15, Andy swamp...@tpg.com.au wrote: 4-5-1, is thta what MM is playing now!!! so whats so absurd about that? On 25/10/2010 1:28 PM, Steven Millward wrote: That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills…
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
There is no rule book but I think you need someone to win the ball if you're having five attacking players. I don't think having the best ten outfield players is the right approach I watched the first half of the Chelsea game this morning and we played very well. There was a bit of cat and mouse from Chelsea as they let us come and then hit on the counter but we were passing nicely and created some good chances. Jarvis had a good half and if Edwards and Doyle had got those headers away from the six yard box we could have scored. He does look like a young Mr Bean though. JVD seemed to offer very little. He day look very gain and gave the ball away a lot, which I presume is why he was subbed. He's turning into another Freddy Eastwood amongst the fans. Everyone, including me, was picking him in their team but he's not very good. On 25 October 2010 21:24, Andy swamp...@tpg.com.au wrote: where does it say in the rule book that you have to have a defensive midfielder? both SEB and Fletcher can cross the ball as good as any Wolves winger Hunt on the weekend when he came on had no speed about him to be thought of as a winger, (I know he's coming back from injury) and after watching the game I would play him in the center. iF I'm not mistaken Fletcher has come on and played midfield and made an impact, therefore striker or not I would play him at midfield. this formation with the players involved can be seen as 451 or 433 or 422, which ever way the situation needed it and which ever way you want to look at it. as far as moaning about MM playing folk out of position, thats his desicion for what ever game they have to play Wouldn't you if you were manager try and put the best players on the paddock regardless of what is next to their name, i.e fullback, midfield or forward??? Just my thoughts,!!! On 25/10/2010 8:35 PM, Steven Millward wrote: Everyone moans about Mick playing people out of position. You have two wingers playing as central midfielders and two strikers playing as wingers. Plus you have no defensive midfielder to break up play or win the ball. That's what's absurd. On 25 October 2010 20:15, Andy swamp...@tpg.com.au wrote: 4-5-1, is thta what MM is playing now!!! so whats so absurd about that? On 25/10/2010 1:28 PM, Steven Millward wrote: That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === --
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager really be making us laugh? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 09:53 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick Did he explain why in the first 30 seconds we gave the ball to Chelski via a kick off back pass and a Hahnemann hoof? Thought the bullshite artiste extraordinaire said we had to retain possession otherwise the ball would come back with spots on. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:20 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Classic Mick Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
He makes us cry with his tactics so making us laugh with his interviews is obviously the yang to go with his ying tactics. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:01 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager really be making us laugh? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 09:53 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick Did he explain why in the first 30 seconds we gave the ball to Chelski via a kick off back pass and a Hahnemann hoof? Thought the bullshite artiste extraordinaire said we had to retain possession otherwise the ball would come back with spots on. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:20 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [BTMO] Classic Mick Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Reserve, didn't think he played that well on sat. seemed lost On 25/10/2010 11:31 AM, Morris, Lee SGT wrote: What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you havent come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === ===Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.(Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140)http://www.pctools.com=== -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
to me hunt didnt play like winger on sat On 25/10/2010 11:35 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis)in a 3 man midfield?That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you havent come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com === ===Email scanned
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Since Keogh has left, Jarvis has adopted the tag of my least liked player so I can't fit him into any formation (might be a bit harsh but so be it). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad Wolves have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield player and Jarvis plays more of a attacking winger/forward than a midfield winger On 25/10/2010 11:59 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: So play our most expensive striker in midfield and our most creative midfielder in attack? That's proper Mick McCarthy tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis.. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis)in a 3 man midfield?That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you havent come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Quiet morning! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:29 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Never seen you get fired up like this before Matty!! Are you on the same arrangement as Paul Crowe where you see no action unless Wolves win? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:27 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Fletcher's a striker. Play your best players in their best positions. If Fletcher's not one of our best strikers (on ability and form) we shouldn't then insist on finding him a place elsewhere in the team because he's a good player. Mick McCarthy gets alot of criticism for playing people out of position (and rightly so) because they 'graft' more than other available options in that position. Annoys the fu(k out of me. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad Wolves have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield player and Jarvis plays more of a attacking winger/forward than a midfield winger On 25/10/2010 11:59 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: So play our most expensive striker in midfield and our most creative midfielder in attack? That's proper Mick McCarthy tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis.. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
4 more games witout a win and I may consider the Priestood! Pity the wife when we do win! 2 - 1 win to the Wolves against Man City. Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra -Original Message- From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:29:11 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Never seen you get fired up like this before Matty!! Are you on the same arrangement as Paul Crowe where you see no action unless Wolves win? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:27 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Fletcher's a striker. Play your best players in their best positions. If Fletcher's not one of our best strikers (on ability and form) we shouldn't then insist on finding him a place elsewhere in the team because he's a good player. Mick McCarthy gets alot of criticism for playing people out of position (and rightly so) because they 'graft' more than other available options in that position. Annoys the fu(k out of me. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad Wolves have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield player and Jarvis plays more of a attacking winger/forward than a midfield winger On 25/10/2010 11:59 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: So play our most expensive striker in midfield and our most creative midfielder in attack? That's proper Mick McCarthy tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis.. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
It'll be december before you have any fun!! From: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com Sent: Mon Oct 25 12:44:45 2010 Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 4 more games witout a win and I may consider the Priestood! Pity the wife when we do win! 2 - 1 win to the Wolves against Man City. Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:29:11 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Never seen you get fired up like this before Matty!! Are you on the same arrangement as Paul Crowe where you see no action unless Wolves win? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:27 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Fletcher's a striker. Play your best players in their best positions. If Fletcher's not one of our best strikers (on ability and form) we shouldn't then insist on finding him a place elsewhere in the team because he's a good player. Mick McCarthy gets alot of criticism for playing people out of position (and rightly so) because they 'graft' more than other available options in that position. Annoys the fu(k out of me. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad Wolves have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield player and Jarvis plays more of a attacking winger/forward than a midfield winger On 25/10/2010 11:59 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: So play our most expensive striker in midfield and our most creative midfielder in attack? That's proper Mick McCarthy tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis.. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Jarvis is widely thought to be one of the best players in our squad. Is it just that you don't fancy him? On 25 October 2010 11:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.comwrote: Since Keogh has left, Jarvis has adopted the tag of my least liked player so I can’t fit him into any formation (might be a bit harsh but so be it). *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.comnswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.comnswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.comnswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.comnswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.comnswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
4-1-5 - everyone will be doing it soon. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:28 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I think it just needs one chaneg to make it not so absurd. Either Fletcher or Ebanks Blake for a defensive central midfielder would do it for me team wise From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If we get a result while Henry is out, I'll start the campaign to keep him out myself. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:31 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I think it just needs one chaneg to make it not so absurd. Either Fletcher or Ebanks Blake for a defensive central midfielder would do it for me team wise From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers /9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.auwrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I like the personnel that Andy has put up - not sure I'd line them up the same way. Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3 the 3 run their bollocks off). _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/912 1353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Having seen our performances this season in 442 I don't think we'll be going anywhere but down with that. I've taped the game but from what I've read we were much better with three CMs. Fletcher now looks like an odd signing. Mick would have been crucified if Doyle had got injured and we only had a then-out-of-form SEB to fall back on. However, I think it's going to be hard to fit him into the team now. It's a shame JVD is mental as with him and Zubar at full back, and Jones and Miljas in midfield with Henry/Mancienne, we could be very attacking in 451. On 25 October 2010 13:31, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: I think it just needs one chaneg to make it not so absurd. Either Fletcher or Ebanks Blake for a defensive central midfielder would do it for me team wise -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed for Wolves. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt in the forward 3 Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but who's going to give them the ball? On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: I like the personnel that Andy has put up – not sure I’d line them up the same way. Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3 the 3 run their bollocks off). -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? ¼hr size=2 width=100% aligî3Dcenter *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Has anyone checked the toilets in the Aurora? Presumably 2-0 doesn't warrant a full trashing? On 25 October 2010 13:44, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt in the forward 3 Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but who's going to give them the ball? On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: I like the personnel that Andy has put up – not sure I’d line them up the same way. Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3 the 3 run their bollocks off). -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? ¼hr size=2 width=100% aligî3Dcenter *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Chuck Mancienne in for Fletcher, he's defensive and attacking...lol So I'd go Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - Mancienne - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake - Kevin Doyle From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt in the forward 3 Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but who's going to give them the ball? On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: I like the personnel that Andy has put up - not sure I'd line them up the same way. Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3 the 3 run their bollocks off). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? ¼hr size=2 width=100% aligî3Dcenter From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills... http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com http
Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
So we're only disagreeing over SEB for Milijas. I wish JVD could play in that position but he's obviously not right. I would like that formation if we had Ince and Rae in for Mancienne and David Jones. On 25 October 2010 13:48, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Chuck Mancienne in for Fletcher, he's defensive and attacking...lol So I'd go Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - Mancienne - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake - Kevin Doyle -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt in the forward 3 Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but who's going to give them the ball? On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: I like the personnel that Andy has put up – not sure I’d line them up the same way. Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3 the 3 run their bollocks off). -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? ¼hr size=2 width=100% aligî3Dcenter *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === === Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.comhttp://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51 === -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken
RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
U need to have a word with Mick, it aint half obvious. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:52 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] So we're only disagreeing over SEB for Milijas. I wish JVD could play in that position but he's obviously not right. I would like that formation if we had Ince and Rae in for Mancienne and David Jones. On 25 October 2010 13:48, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote: Chuck Mancienne in for Fletcher, he's defensive and attacking...lol So I'd go Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - Mancienne - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake - Kevin Doyle From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt in the forward 3 Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but who's going to give them the ball? On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: I like the personnel that Andy has put up - not sure I'd line them up the same way. Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3 the 3 run their bollocks off). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but it's hardly appropriate now. Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise? On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au wrote: 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? ¼hr size=2 width=100% aligî3Dcenter From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy
