Re: [NTG-context] Part numbers

2013-08-12 Thread Tim Steenvoorden
Thanks Pablo! Works like a charm.

Cheers,
Tim

On 11 augustus 2013 at 19:02:40, Pablo Rodríguez (oi...@web.de) wrote:

On 08/11/2013 03:08 PM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:  
 Hi all,  
  
 I have a document with parts and chapters. I'd like to number the  
 chapters continuously through the whole document. Figured out this has  
 to be done with \definestructureresetset instead of the resetnumber=no  
 option in \setuphead. But I don't want to include the number of the part  
 in chapters and sections. How do I do that?  

Hi Tim,  

I think this is what you need:  

\definestructureresetset[default][1,0,1][1]  
\setuphead[chapter][sectionsegments=chapter]  
\setuphead[section][sectionsegments=chapter:section]  
\starttext  
\completecontent  
\dorecurse{5}{\part{Part}  
\dorecurse{2}{\chapter{Chapter}  
\dorecurse{2}{\section{Section  
\stoptext  

I hope it helps,  


Pablo  
--  
http://www.ousia.tk  
___
  
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!  

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context  
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net  
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/  
wiki : http://contextgarden.net  
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Wrong font size in footer

2013-08-12 Thread Hans Hagen

On 8/12/2013 4:50 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

Hi,

There is bug in which the font style of the page leaks into the footer
style. Here is a minimal example:

 \setupfootertexts[This is a footer \the\lineheight ]
 \setuppapersize[A6]

 \definestartstop[test][style=\tfx]

 \starttext
 \subject {Normal page}

 \input knuth

 \subject {Wrong footer size}

 \starttest
   \dorecurse{2}{\input knuth \par}
 \stoptest

 \stoptext

As the output indicates, the font size of the footer on the first two
pages is 12.068pt while that of the third page is 14.481pt.


fixed

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
Dear list,

although I cannot find it now, I sent a message to the list describing
that I suspected ConTeXt wasn’t as fast as it should on my computer.

Here you have a minimal sample:

\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext

It takes about 3.5 seconds total runtime to compile. Is this the
standard required time?

Actually what I wonder is why the compilation requires three runs to
output the final document.

Many thanks for your help,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 12.08.2013 um 18:40 schrieb Pablo Rodríguez oi...@web.de:

 Dear list,
 
 although I cannot find it now, I sent a message to the list describing
 that I suspected ConTeXt wasn’t as fast as it should on my computer.
 
 Here you have a minimal sample:
 
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
 
 It takes about 3.5 seconds total runtime to compile. Is this the
 standard required time?

Your minimal example takes for me on the first 1.8 (terminal) to 2 seconds 
(editor)
and each consecutive run about 0.6 seconds.

 Actually what I wonder is why the compilation requires three runs to
 output the final document.

When you process a new document the first time context takes three runs
to store and read data in the temp files (references and roc etc. values).

After this context takes in most cases only a single run unless references
have changed (e.g. the reference is now on a new page) or new entries
are written to the temp files (e.g. when you add a additional heading).

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Hans Hagen

On 8/12/2013 6:40 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:

Dear list,

although I cannot find it now, I sent a message to the list describing
that I suspected ConTeXt wasn’t as fast as it should on my computer.

Here you have a minimal sample:

 \starttext
 \input knuth
 \stoptext

It takes about 3.5 seconds total runtime to compile. Is this the
standard required time?

Actually what I wonder is why the compilation requires three runs to
output the final document.


mkiv lua stats   runtime: 0.250 seconds
system  | total runtime: 0.422

luajittex:

mkiv lua stats   runtime: 0.200 seconds
system  | total runtime: 0.360

Dell Laptop: i7-3840QM @ 2.8G / 16 GB / 256G SSD / windows 8 64 bit

\starttext
\dorecurse{1000}{test\page}
\stoptext

does 540 pages per second

of course in practice it all depends on what features are used but 3.5 
seconds is way off, unless you remake the format each run (coul dbe the 
case of your luatex doesn't match texlua


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 08/12/2013 07:20 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
 Am 12.08.2013 um 18:40 schrieb Pablo Rodríguez oi...@web.de:
 [...]
 It takes about 3.5 seconds total runtime to compile. Is this the
 standard required time?
 
 Your minimal example takes for me on the first 1.8 (terminal) to 2 seconds 
 (editor)
 and each consecutive run about 0.6 seconds.

Many thanks for your reply, Wolfgang.

So if I need three times for each compilation (since I use --purgeall),
the time is fine, since my laptop is already some years old.



Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 08/12/2013 09:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
 On 8/12/2013 6:40 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:

 It takes about 3.5 seconds total runtime to compile. Is this the
 standard required time?

 Actually what I wonder is why the compilation requires three runs to
 output the final document.
 
 mkiv lua stats   runtime: 0.250 seconds
 system  | total runtime: 0.422
 
 luajittex:
 
 mkiv lua stats   runtime: 0.200 seconds
 system  | total runtime: 0.360
 
 Dell Laptop: i7-3840QM @ 2.8G / 16 GB / 256G SSD / windows 8 64 bit
 
 \starttext
  \dorecurse{1000}{test\page}
 \stoptext
 
 does 540 pages per second

Many thanks for the reply, Hans.

My system does 172.980 pages/second in the last run. My laptop is way
older than yours (Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2050  @ 1.60GHz / 2GB RAM /
Fedora 19).


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:


So if I need three times for each compilation (since I use --purgeall),
the time is fine, since my laptop is already some years old.


Out of curiosity, why do you use --purgeall? ConTeXt only generates two 
auxillary files (.tuc and .log), so it is does not really clutter the 
current working directory (unlike LaTeX which generates some 10 different 
aux files).


Aditya___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 08/12/2013 10:37 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
 On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
 
 So if I need three times for each compilation (since I use --purgeall),
 the time is fine, since my laptop is already some years old.
 
 Out of curiosity, why do you use --purgeall? ConTeXt only generates two 
 auxillary files (.tuc and .log), so it is does not really clutter the 
 current working directory (unlike LaTeX which generates some 10 different 
 aux files).

I thought ConTeXt could generate more auxiliary files than two.

And using --purgeall I don’t have to remember to delete auxiliary files
when the document is finished.

But I guess I‘ll use --purgeall only when the document is finished.


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:


On 08/12/2013 10:37 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:


So if I need three times for each compilation (since I use --purgeall),
the time is fine, since my laptop is already some years old.


Out of curiosity, why do you use --purgeall? ConTeXt only generates two
auxillary files (.tuc and .log), so it is does not really clutter the
current working directory (unlike LaTeX which generates some 10 different
aux files).


I thought ConTeXt could generate more auxiliary files than two.


In MkII ConTeXt used to generate more auxiliary files; in MkIV it only 
generates one (.tuc). The log file is a TeX feature that cannot be turned 
off (I think).


If you use bibtex, then ConTeXt must also generate the .aux file (because 
that is hardwired into bibtex!) and bibtex then generates a bbl file. So, 
in the worst case, you end up with four extra files.


Aditya___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] slow compilation?

2013-08-12 Thread Hans Hagen

On 8/12/2013 11:23 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:

On 08/12/2013 10:37 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:


So if I need three times for each compilation (since I use --purgeall),
the time is fine, since my laptop is already some years old.


Out of curiosity, why do you use --purgeall? ConTeXt only generates two
auxillary files (.tuc and .log), so it is does not really clutter the
current working directory (unlike LaTeX which generates some 10 different
aux files).


I thought ConTeXt could generate more auxiliary files than two.

And using --purgeall I don’t have to remember to delete auxiliary files
when the document is finished.

But I guess I‘ll use --purgeall only when the document is finished.


or just --purge as it will keep the tuc file


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___