Re: [NTG-context] request for a few volunteers to test distribution on new server

2012-12-01 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz

On 11/30/2012 03:22 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

Dear ConTeXters,

we will point the distribution to the new server later today (for a
moment without any significant changes). Before we do that I would
like to ask some of you to try out
./first-install.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net
to make sure that I didn't do any obvious mistake on the way.


Hi Mojca,

I just checked the new server. There appear to be no obvious errors, 
everything works. Just a few small observations:


1. ./first-install.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net: I assume 
you meant ./first-setup.sh, right?


2. Is the rsync phase somewhat slower than it used to be? I have no real 
measurements, just the impression that it took somewhat longer.


3. I assume the new server doesn't get synced to the latest beta yet? 
Because I get 2012.11.29 18:40, but 2012.11.30 has been out since 
yesterday, according to the pragma website.


Thanks for the important and wonderful work, all best

Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] request for a few volunteers to test distribution on new server

2012-12-01 Thread Hans Hagen

On 12/1/2012 11:06 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

On 11/30/2012 03:22 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

Dear ConTeXters,

we will point the distribution to the new server later today (for a
moment without any significant changes). Before we do that I would
like to ask some of you to try out
./first-install.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net
to make sure that I didn't do any obvious mistake on the way.


Hi Mojca,

I just checked the new server. There appear to be no obvious errors,
everything works. Just a few small observations:

1. ./first-install.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net: I assume
you meant ./first-setup.sh, right?


Which reminds me .. weren't we going to rename the script into 
context-install' or so?



2. Is the rsync phase somewhat slower than it used to be? I have no real
measurements, just the impression that it took somewhat longer.


the previous server was probably located close to your home


3. I assume the new server doesn't get synced to the latest beta yet?
Because I get 2012.11.29 18:40, but 2012.11.30 has been out since
yesterday, according to the pragma website.


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] request for a few volunteers to test distribution on new server

2012-12-01 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

 Hi Mojca,

 I just checked the new server. There appear to be no obvious errors,
 everything works. Just a few small observations:

 1. ./first-install.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net: I assume you
 meant ./first-setup.sh, right?

Yes. (But Hans' point is also true.)

 2. Is the rsync phase somewhat slower than it used to be? I have no real
 measurements, just the impression that it took somewhat longer.

I don't know. There is a high chance that lots of things had to be
synchronized just because the date is different than it used to be on
the old server. Maybe you observed that? But I didn't do any timings
either.

(Hans' explanation is also possible, but less likely.)

I'm actually curious about the highest speed that people can get when
fetching files from the server.

 3. I assume the new server doesn't get synced to the latest beta yet?
 Because I get 2012.11.29 18:40, but 2012.11.30 has been out since yesterday,
 according to the pragma website.

Thanks for noticing. ConTeXt itself has been updated, I still need to
figure out why it hasn't been synced to the distribution.

Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] request for a few volunteers to test distribution on new server

2012-11-30 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Mojca Miklavec
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear ConTeXters,

 we will point the distribution to the new server later today (for a
 moment without any significant changes). Before we do that I would
 like to ask some of you to try out
./first-install.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net
./first-setup.sh --server=distribution.contextgarden.net
is ok and
status-mkiv.tex compiles ok.




--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___