Search feature in OakServlet
Hi Oak Maestros, I had a chance to run oak after getting impressed from Jukka's presentation in Denver. You guys have been doing great jobs! One question with regard to OakServlet is it doesn't have a search function (yet?), so even though it can provide a full-featured CRUD functions now, it seems more useful for http-binding clients if it also provides search feature (e.g, search all wiki pages having 'OAK' term for instance). How does it sound? Thanks! Regards, Woonsan
Re: Review currently exported package version for 1.0 release
Hi, On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > Currently some packages are exported at 0.18, 0.16 and some are being > exported at bundle version. We should add explicit package versions to all exported packages. > Should we bump all of them to 1.0.0 for the 1.0 release Yes. After 1.0 we'll need to be much more strict about backwards compatiblity, so bumping the major version number now is a good idea. > and ensue they are consistent from there on. Not consistent, correct. The package versions should evolve semantically based on changed to those specific packages, not in sync with the broader Oak/Jackrabbit release cycle. > Also would helpful to review the list once i.e. if the package export > is required for e.g in oak-solr-osgi exports quite abit but are > probably not required. Agreed. The fewer packages we export now in 1.0, the less backwards compatibility effort will be required down the line. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: Review currently exported package version for 1.0 release
Hi Chetan, oak-solr-osgi should export the same packages exported by oak-solr-core, to me the list looks good. Regards, Tommaso 2014-04-17 13:01 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra : > Hi Team, > > As part of OAK-1741 [1] I have captured details about current exported > packages from various bundles provided as part of Oak. > > Currently some packages are exported at 0.18, 0.16 and some are being > exported at bundle version. > > Should we bump all of them to 1.0.0 for the 1.0 release and ensure > they are consistent from there on. > > Also would helpful to review the list once i.e. if the package export > is required for e.g in oak-solr-osgi exports quite abit but are > probably not required. > > Chetan Mehrotra > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1741 >
Review currently exported package version for 1.0 release
Hi Team, As part of OAK-1741 [1] I have captured details about current exported packages from various bundles provided as part of Oak. Currently some packages are exported at 0.18, 0.16 and some are being exported at bundle version. Should we bump all of them to 1.0.0 for the 1.0 release and ensure they are consistent from there on. Also would helpful to review the list once i.e. if the package export is required for e.g in oak-solr-osgi exports quite abit but are probably not required. Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1741
