Re: oak-parent: DB2 dependency with system scope
Hi, On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > thanks; I'm going with option 1); it's a bit messy but then it only affects > people who want to test with DB2 for now. An alternative with different messiness aspects would be to place the DB2 driver in $JAVA_HOME/lib/ext. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: oak-parent: DB2 dependency with system scope
On 2014-06-12 07:35, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: Instead of embedding various such drivers I would prefer we include/refer them as part of classpath on command line. So one of the following two approaches can be used 1. Specify the jars as part of classpath java -cp oak-run-xxx.jar:driver.jar org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.run.Main benchmark ... 2. OR refer to the jars (pre defined names) as part of Class-Path attribute of oak-run manifest and place the required jars in same directory. In that can you can just run the jar with java -jar Chetan Mehrotra ... Chetan, thanks; I'm going with option 1); it's a bit messy but then it only affects people who want to test with DB2 for now. Best regards, Julian
Re: oak-parent: DB2 dependency with system scope
Instead of embedding various such drivers I would prefer we include/refer them as part of classpath on command line. So one of the following two approaches can be used 1. Specify the jars as part of classpath java -cp oak-run-xxx.jar:driver.jar org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.run.Main benchmark ... 2. OR refer to the jars (pre defined names) as part of Class-Path attribute of oak-run manifest and place the required jars in same directory. In that can you can just run the jar with java -jar Chetan Mehrotra On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi, > > we currently have a system-scoped dependency for the DB2 JDBC drivers, > because (by copyright) they are not available from Maven repos. > > Turns out that this doesn't work well with the Maven Shade plugin, which is > used to build oak-run. > > It seems the path of least resistance is to make the DB2 dependency a > regular one, and require those who need it to deploy the JARs to their local > Maven repo. > > Can everybody live with that? > > Best regards, Julian
