Re: [onap-discuss] [VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39

[WRIGHT, STEVEN A]

Ok – I’ll add to agenda for Tuesday call


best regards
Steven Wright, MBA, PhD, JD.
[Tech Integration]
AT&T Services Inc.
1057 Lenox Park Blvd NE, STE 4D28
Atlanta, GA 30319
P: 470.415.3156

sw3...@att.com
www.linkedin.com/in/drstevenawright/

From: feng.yuanx...@zte.com.cn [mailto:feng.yuanx...@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:47 AM
To: WRIGHT, STEVEN A ; PATTEN, HERBERT L 
Cc: guanwen...@chinamobile.com; zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39


Hi Steven and Herb,apt



I add a new jira VNFRQTS-100 in order to solve this dilemma. It would be better 
if we discuss the outline of Chapter 4.



https://jira.onap.org/browse/VNFRQTS-100



Thanks,

Fengyuanxing






原始邮件
发件人：冯远兴10034308
收件人： mailto:sw3...@att.com>>; 
mailto:hp1...@att.com>>;
抄送人： 
mailto:guanwen...@chinamobile.com>>;张茂鹏10030173; 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;
日 期 ：2017年09月08日 09:35
主 题 ：[VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39



Hi Steven and Herb,



I saw the below code-review comment from Herb. Does it mean that I should merge 
the content of seed doc from Open-O into Chapter4 in the repo? I had thought in 
Sprint 1 it;s fine and leave the merge job to be done in the future.



Here are the details: 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/10721/






Herb Patten
Sep 7 8:00 PM
↩

Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1

There is no part g and h on the agreed upon content of this document. This 
project, in sprint 1, agreed upon the structure and content of the requirements 
document. If you want to change that structure you should propose a change to 
the project and not simply add new sections to the document








___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39

[feng.yuanxing]

Hi Steven and Herb,apt




I add a new jira VNFRQTS-100 in order to solve this dilemma. It would be better 
if we discuss the outline of Chapter 4.




https://jira.onap.org/browse/VNFRQTS-100




Thanks,

Fengyuanxing












原始邮件



发件人：冯远兴10034308
收件人：  
抄送人： 张茂鹏10030173 
日 期 ：2017年09月08日 09:35
主 题 ：[VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39






Hi Steven and Herb,




I saw the below code-review comment from Herb. Does it mean that I should merge 
the content of seed doc from Open-O into Chapter4 in the repo? I had thought in 
Sprint 1 its fine and leave the merge job to be done in the future.




Here are the details: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/10721/












Herb Patten

Sep 7 8:00 PM
↩



Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1


There is no part g and h on the agreed upon content of this document. This 
project, in sprint 1, agreed upon the structure and content of the requirements 
document. If you want to change that structure you should propose a change to 
the project and not simply add new sections to the document___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39

[feng.yuanxing]

Hi Steven and Herb,




I saw the below code-review comment from Herb. Does it mean that I should merge 
the content of seed doc from Open-O into Chapter4 in the repo? I had thought in 
Sprint 1 its fine and leave the merge job to be done in the future.




Here are the details: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/10721/












Herb Patten

Sep 7 8:00 PM
↩



Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1


There is no part g and h on the agreed upon content of this document. This 
project, in sprint 1, agreed upon the structure and content of the requirements 
document. If you want to change that structure you should propose a change to 
the project and not simply add new sections to the document___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss