Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On Monday, 9. April 2012 at 14:10, Claudio Filho wrote: Hi 2012/4/9 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: any further info on this, for me the localize.sdf looks good. I have to check it in detail... But I can confirm the problem the menu is a mix of English and Brazil. My suggestion is continue to RC version, Jürgen. I started to build in my machine and i will try to find the problem. If we not find the problem for first release, we can see for a 3.4.1 for pt-BR. So, go yes that is my opinion as well wth the translation. The Linux problem is more critical from my pov. Juergen Best, Claudio
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/7/12 10:56 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: Hi 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi I haven't time to test each build, Jürgen, but i downloaded now the Brazilian (pt-BR) - r1309668 - now and found a strange behavior. All strings in the menu bar are in english, and when i open a dialog, it is translated. In the installer is the same thing. All in english, except the strings of buttons (en/pt-BR, next/próximo, previous/anterior, etc). mmh, strange I have no idea what's going wrong, the localization looks complete. Which platform do you have tested? Have anybody else noticed a similar problem with other languages? Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hello Jürgen, 2012/4/8 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/7/12 10:56 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: Hi 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.comjogischm...@googlemail.com : Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi I haven't time to test each build, Jürgen, but i downloaded now the Brazilian (pt-BR) - r1309668 - now and found a strange behavior. All strings in the menu bar are in english, and when i open a dialog, it is translated. In the installer is the same thing. All in english, except the strings of buttons (en/pt-BR, next/próximo, previous/anterior, etc). mmh, strange I have no idea what's going wrong, the localization looks complete. Which platform do you have tested? Have anybody else noticed a similar problem with other languages? I'm working with the fr version (Windows XP SP3) without problem up to now. Many thanks for your work in the project. A+ -- gw
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi 2012/4/8 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: mmh, strange I have no idea what's going wrong, the localization looks complete. Yes. Anyway, i took a look in localize.sdf file for pt-BR and found some strings in a different column. Did you chek the file struture after the convertion from PO format? The more strange was to see some portuguese (pt-PT) strings in the UI. :-S Which platform do you have tested? Have anybody else noticed a similar problem with other languages? In Mac OSX SnowLeopard and Win7 with your packages (r1309668), and from Ariel for linux x86_64 (r1310955) under a Debian Unstable amd64. All with same problem. Best, Claudio
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/8/12 3:36 PM, Claudio Filho wrote: Hi 2012/4/8 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: mmh, strange I have no idea what's going wrong, the localization looks complete. Yes. Anyway, i took a look in localize.sdf file for pt-BR and found some strings in a different column. Did you chek the file struture after the convertion from PO format? The more strange was to see some portuguese (pt-PT) strings in the UI. :-S I have used your po files to update the Pootle server and that looked ok for me. The word count matched, the file structure looked good ... I used this version from ppotle and convert it back into sdf in the same way as for all other languages. Maybe you can check the version on the Pootle server if the problem is there already. Juergen Which platform do you have tested? Have anybody else noticed a similar problem with other languages? In Mac OSX SnowLeopard and Win7 with your packages (r1309668), and from Ariel for linux x86_64 (r1310955) under a Debian Unstable amd64. All with same problem. Best, Claudio
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Have anybody else noticed a similar problem with other languages? The latest Italian build by Ariel (r1310206) is already uploaded and I don't see major localization problems. Actually, I see that a few strings (like print options and Pivot Tables) that were missing in previous builds are now properly localized according to the latest strings submitted by Paolo. Regards, Andrea.
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi I haven't time to test each build, Jürgen, but i downloaded now the Brazilian (pt-BR) - r1309668 - now and found a strange behavior. All strings in the menu bar are in english, and when i open a dialog, it is translated. In the installer is the same thing. All in english, except the strings of buttons (en/pt-BR, next/próximo, previous/anterior, etc). Best, Claudio
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 12:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/5/12 9:22 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Important: don't forget the --enable-bundled-dictionaries configure switch The uploads for MacOS and Windows are in progress... Very slow from home and I had an interruption last night. NOTE: full install sets only!!! Not yet referenced on the wiki page but you find the signature files in the same download directory if somebody is interested to verify this. Instructions can be found on the src release page http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/src_releases/srcrelease.html Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:22:12AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. due to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119168 Linux build must be based on rev. 1310206 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1310206 Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpA0LOCuGaQL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi Jürgen Schmidt, tried to install http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe but got: --- NSIS Error --- Installer integrity check has failed. Common causes include incomplete download and damaged media. Contact the installer's author to obtain a new copy. More information at: http://nsis.sf.net/NSIS_Error Regards Oliver -- GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, Am 06.04.2012 13:18, schrieb Oliver Brinzing: Hi Jürgen Schmidt, tried to install http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe but got: --- NSIS Error --- Installer integrity check has failed. Common causes include incomplete download and damaged media. Contact the installer's author to obtain a new copy. More information at: http://nsis.sf.net/NSIS_Error Confirming, Windows 7 64 bit in Virtualbox. Regards Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_fr.exe works fine. Josef Am 06.04.2012 15:22, schrieb Josef Latt: Hi, Am 06.04.2012 13:18, schrieb Oliver Brinzing: Hi Jürgen Schmidt, tried to install http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe but got: --- NSIS Error --- Installer integrity check has failed. Common causes include incomplete download and damaged media. Contact the installer's author to obtain a new copy. More information at: http://nsis.sf.net/NSIS_Error Confirming, Windows 7 64 bit in Virtualbox. Regards Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_ru.exe was installed without errors (W7sp1 x64). Oliver, try to verify downloaded installer checksum (one of md5/sha1/sha256). -- wbr, sb 2012/4/6 Oliver Brinzing oliver.brinz...@gmx.de: Hi Jürgen Schmidt, tried to install http://people.apache.org/~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe but got: --- NSIS Error --- Installer integrity check has failed. Common causes include incomplete download and damaged media. Contact the installer's author to obtain a new copy. More information at: http://nsis.sf.net/NSIS_Error Regards Oliver -- GnuPG key 0xCFD04A45: 8822 057F 4956 46D3 352C 1A06 4E2C AB40 CFD0 4A45
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, do you have a link for checksums. I don't find. Josef Am 06.04.2012 15:43, schrieb Serg Bormant: Hi, Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_ru.exe was installed without errors (W7sp1 x64). Oliver, try to verify downloaded installer checksum (one of md5/sha1/sha256). -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
The requested URL /~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe was not found on this server. -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/6/12 3:52 PM, Josef Latt wrote: The requested URL /~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe was not found on this server. I am uploading the Windows en-US version, should be available later. And I am uploading the German version again, should be also available later. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, Am 06.04.2012 16:23, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 4/6/12 3:52 PM, Josef Latt wrote: The requested URL /~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe was not found on this server. I am uploading the Windows en-US version, should be available later. And I am uploading the German version again, should be also available later. I have download both files at 16:58 CET. Both with NSIS_error. Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On Friday, 6. April 2012 at 17:14, Josef Latt wrote: Hi, Am 06.04.2012 16:23, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 4/6/12 3:52 PM, Josef Latt wrote: The requested URL /~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe was not found on this server. I am uploading the Windows en-US version, should be available later. And I am uploading the German version again, should be also available later. I have download both files at 16:58 CET. Both with NSIS_error. It seems that you can't wait to test it ;-) The upload is ongoing. I will inform you when it has finished .. Juergen Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, Am 06.04.2012 17:24, schrieb Juergen Schmidt: On Friday, 6. April 2012 at 17:14, Josef Latt wrote: Hi, Am 06.04.2012 16:23, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 4/6/12 3:52 PM, Josef Latt wrote: The requested URL /~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe was not found on this server. I am uploading the Windows en-US version, should be available later. And I am uploading the German version again, should be also available later. I have download both files at 16:58 CET. Both with NSIS_error. It seems that you can't wait to test it ;-) The upload is ongoing. I will inform you when it has finished .. Thanks. Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 06/04/2012 Oliver Brinzing wrote: Oliver, try to verify downloaded installer checksum (one of md5/sha1/sha256). md5sum -c Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_de.exe md5sum: Íb♠↔+Ql0O↑Ý♀b╬Ù┼ÍOff♀'(¶Õ☻¯*Iô♂2Û?0 ▲☻: No such file or directory Íb♠↔+Ql0O↑Ý♀b╬Ù┼ÍOff♀'(¶Õ☻¯*Iô♂2Û?0 ▲☻: FAILED open or read md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 listed file could not be read i am pretty sure the file is broken ... It is broken (as Juergen wrote) but this is not the right way to verify it: your command would fail the same way on any executable file. The command md5sum -c assumes you have a text file (call it MD5FILE) with the expected checksums, one per line, like http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/stable/3.3.0/OOo_3.3.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe.md5 You then run md5sum -c MD5FILE on this file to recompute the checksum on the file you downloaded and automatically compare it with the one stored in MD5FILE. Regards, Andrea.
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/6/12 5:34 PM, Josef Latt wrote: Hi, Am 06.04.2012 17:24, schrieb Juergen Schmidt: On Friday, 6. April 2012 at 17:14, Josef Latt wrote: Hi, Am 06.04.2012 16:23, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 4/6/12 3:52 PM, Josef Latt wrote: The requested URL /~jsc/developer-snapshots/windows/r1309668/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe was not found on this server. I am uploading the Windows en-US version, should be available later. And I am uploading the German version again, should be also available later. I have download both files at 16:58 CET. Both with NSIS_error. It seems that you can't wait to test it ;-) The upload is ongoing. I will inform you when it has finished .. Thanks. should be available now Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, Am 06.04.2012 18:07, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: I am uploading the Windows en-US version, should be available later. And I am uploading the German version again, should be also available later. I have download both files at 16:58 CET. Both with NSIS_error. It seems that you can't wait to test it ;-) The upload is ongoing. I will inform you when it has finished .. Thanks. should be available now Both files has no error. I installed German version without problems. Josef -- PGP Schlüssel: 311D1055 http://keyserver.pgp.com
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
How long shall we wait before we vote? 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Juergen, Usually how long the vote will continue? Lily 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.comjogischm...@googlemail.com : Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: ... I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi Is it possible to include kid pseudolocale in the build? -- wbr, sb
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 9:22 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Important: don't forget the --enable-bundled-dictionaries configure switch Juergen Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 12:21 PM, Serg Bormant wrote: Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: ... I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi Is it possible to include kid pseudolocale in the build? For this round it is potentially too late, at least for Windows. Can you tell me more about this pseudolocale kid. I know you have mentioned it before but I have to confess that I don't know anything about it and would like to learn more... Do we need it on Pootle as well? How is it prepared? Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 1:13 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/5/12 12:21 PM, Serg Bormant wrote: Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: ... I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi Is it possible to include kid pseudolocale in the build? For this round it is potentially too late, at least for Windows. Can you tell me more about this pseudolocale kid. I know you have mentioned it before but I have to confess that I don't know anything about it and would like to learn more... Do we need it on Pootle as well? How is it prepared? I meant do we need as reference on Pootle? I would expect that it is generated automatically but I don't know how. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 1:17 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/5/12 1:13 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/5/12 12:21 PM, Serg Bormant wrote: Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: ... I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi Is it possible to include kid pseudolocale in the build? For this round it is potentially too late, at least for Windows. Can you tell me more about this pseudolocale kid. I know you have mentioned it before but I have to confess that I don't know anything about it and would like to learn more... Do we need it on Pootle as well? How is it prepared? I meant do we need as reference on Pootle? I would expect that it is generated automatically but I don't know how. I have found something and will test it... I will keep you informed Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: I have found something and will test it... I will keep you informed Thanks. Sometimes we need to find particular UI element in SDF/PO set. Kid (Key ID) interface greatly simplifies this task. -- wbr, sb
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On 4/5/12 1:36 PM, Serg Bormant wrote: Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@googlemail.com: I have found something and will test it... I will keep you informed Thanks. Sometimes we need to find particular UI element in SDF/PO set. Kid (Key ID) interface greatly simplifies this task. ok, I was able to create a new kid/localize.sdf and will prepare a language pack for MacOS later. We can include this pseudo-locale in the future when we have ensured that the new file works as expected and the language pack is usable. Which platform do you use? Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Juergen, Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a regression testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the community vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE perspective, after the build passed her regression test. Thanks! - Simon 2012/4/5 xia zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com Juergen, Usually how long the vote will continue? Lily 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.com jogischm...@googlemail.com : Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Juergen, Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a regression testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the community vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE perspective, after the build passed her regression test. Thanks! How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build? How many days? -Rob - Simon 2012/4/5 xia zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com Juergen, Usually how long the vote will continue? Lily 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.com jogischm...@googlemail.com : Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Rob, Per the wiki where Lily proposed the RC build test plan, it will take = 1 week. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+RC+Build+Test+Plan - Simon 2012/4/5 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Juergen, Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a regression testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the community vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE perspective, after the build passed her regression test. Thanks! How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build? How many days? -Rob - Simon 2012/4/5 xia zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com Juergen, Usually how long the vote will continue? Lily 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.com jogischm...@googlemail.com : Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Rob, Per the wiki where Lily proposed the RC build test plan, it will take = 1 week. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+RC+Build+Test+Plan OK. I would recommend that we do not delay the vote for the regression test results. Instead, we should have the voting period be long enough that the regression tests will be done before the vote closes. That way IPMC members can do their release verification in parallel with Lily's final testing. -Rob - Simon 2012/4/5 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Juergen, Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a regression testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the community vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE perspective, after the build passed her regression test. Thanks! How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build? How many days? -Rob - Simon 2012/4/5 xia zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com Juergen, Usually how long the vote will continue? Lily 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.com jogischm...@googlemail.com : Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Hi, 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com: Which platform do you use? Windows (XPsp3 x86, 7sp1 x86-64), Linux (x86/x86-64, Slackware/Fedora/Ubuntu) -- wbr, sb
Re: [RELEASE]: propose next build (RC?!) based on r1309668
Rob, I agree, that's why I ask how long the vote will continue. Once RC build is ready, the RC build test will begin, most focus on installation, and some regression testing. Lily 2012/4/5 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Rob, Per the wiki where Lily proposed the RC build test plan, it will take = 1 week. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+RC+Build+Test+Plan OK. I would recommend that we do not delay the vote for the regression test results. Instead, we should have the voting period be long enough that the regression tests will be done before the vote closes. That way IPMC members can do their release verification in parallel with Lily's final testing. -Rob - Simon 2012/4/5 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Juergen, Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a regression testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the community vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE perspective, after the build passed her regression test. Thanks! How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build? How many days? -Rob - Simon 2012/4/5 xia zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com Juergen, Usually how long the vote will continue? Lily 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: How long shall we wait before we vote? We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to take a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a call for the VOTE on various lists then. In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. Juergen 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidtjogischmidt@**googlemail.com jogischm...@googlemail.com : Hi, a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our first release. The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 header. The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru zh-TW fi The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already built for the developer snapshots. We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied with the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first RC. Juergen
