[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen 2.10.3 released

[Galen Charlton]

Hi,

We are pleased to announce the release of Evergreen 2.10.3, a critical
bugfix release.

* Evergreen 2.10.3 fixes a critical bug wherein a newly-registered
patron record could not be used to log in to Evergreen using the
password supplied during registration. Under some circumstances, the
same bug could also prevent patron records that were modified via the
patron registration form from being used to log in.
* Also, emails sent using the Action Trigger SendEmail reactor now
always MIME-encode the From, To, Subject, Bcc, Cc, Reply-To, and
Sender headers. As a consequence, non-ASCII character in those fields
are more likely to be displayed correctly in email clients.

Please visit the downloads page [1] to retrieve the server software
and staff clients. Due to the nature of the critical bug fixed in this
release, we strongly recommend that users and testers of the 2.10.x
series upgrade as soon as possible.

[1] https://evergreen-ils.org/egdownloads/

Regards,

Galen
-- 
Galen Charlton
Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
Equinox Software, Inc. / Open Your Library
email:  g...@esilibrary.com
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell:   +1 404-984-4366
skype:  gmcharlt
web:http://www.esilibrary.com/
Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org &
http://evergreen-ils.org

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Carol Yarrison]

Yes, please, I was not able to take part in the full thing.

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Yamil Suarez  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of
> folks trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a
> second practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there
> was community interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on
> this list that may want to learn.
>
> I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to
> join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning
> too.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Yamil
>
>
>
>


-- 
“What in the world would we do without our libraries?”
― Katharine Hepburn


Carol Yarrison
Help Desk Coordinator/Trainer
Bibliomation, Inc
24 Wooster Ave
Waterbury, CT
203-577-4070 x112

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Yamil Suarez]

Scott,

Thanks for the question.

One thing I want to bring up for clarity's sake is that IRC is used for two
separate things in our community, just like in other open source project
communities. First of all it is used as an always-on communication channel,
but as well as a platform to hold meetings. Since a good number of
community members are already connecting and communicating on IRC, this
makes it an easy choice to also have our meetings there. That way the
community can read along when a meeting happens in real time, and no new
software needs to be installed/used for access.

For me one of the biggest advantages of IRC is the fact that it is alway
on, automatically logged, and free. Unlike other solutions designed
specifically for meetings which in almost all cases have some or all of the
following limitations: not free, has participant limits, must have at least
one active meeting admin, and creates very large files for meeting
recordings.

I have been part Evergreen related meetings that were held in some of the
platforms that you mentioned. Though we made sure we took minutes to
maintain openness, but to be honest once there are more than 5 participants
it became hard to not interrupt each other. Also, we had to have at least a
single person to fire up the meeting.

Hope this helps,
Yamil

P.S. I will send out another email to pick  from a couple of dates for the
next practice time.








Yamil Suarez, MCS
Library Systems Administrator/Developer

Stan Getz Library
Berklee College of Music
1140 Boylston St
Boston, MA 02215

ysua...@berklee.edu
617-747-2617

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Jason Etheridge 
wrote:

> >Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as an on-line
> meeting venue?
>
> Also, because the developers are there, and they're there for cultural
> reasons in addition to the practical reasons.
>
> And who doesn't like IRC "bots"? :)
>
> --
> Jason Etheridge
> | Community and Migration Manager
> | Equinox Software - Open Your Library
> | 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
> | ja...@esilibrary.com
> | http://www.esilibrary.com
>

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[James Keenan]

I hear and understand Scott’s comments and they are worth considering. We can 
tend to get stuck in ruts and never bother looking outside. At the same time, I 
would like to second Chris’ comments. The publicly logged and web-searchable 
aspect is critical. Being able to find that one conversation where I got a 
solution a year ago (but have forgotten it now) has been a stress-saver for me 
on more than one occasion. Ben’s comment about cross-platform compatibility 
raises another critical point. You can do IRC from any platform. The low point 
of entry is another significant aspect. As long as you have access to a 
computer with a network connection, even an old 
one-step-away-from-being-a-doorstop model, you can do IRC. The last point Chris 
raises about simultaneous users is typically the breaking point for non-IRC 
solutions, the place where either they don’t work or you’ve got to put up a 
bunch of money to make them work (as Ben points out). Antiquated looking, 
though…not much to do about that. I’ve been doing this since the days I ran a 
Wildcat BBS and so, yes, I’m a little antiquated myself (cue memories of 
listening to the modem sing the song of its people) and I may be so used to it 
I don’t notice the look/feel so much.

Jim

Jim Keenan
Library Applications Supervisor
C/W MARS, Inc.
67 Millbrook St.
Worcester, MA 01606
508-755-3323 x323

http://www.cwmars.org


From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Chris 
Sharp
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 1:46 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group 
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

A couple of pro-IRC points to consider as well:
- conversations are publicly logged and web-searchable
- despite the apparent intimidation factor for new users (mitigated by sessions 
like Yamil so generously offers), it's a low point of entry
- can accommodate hundreds (or thousands) of users who can participate in real 
time, making meetings truly public (the most I've seen teleconferencing 
software accommodate is maybe 15, increasing costs for whoever is hosting the 
meeting)
I'm open to individual committees or the Evergreen Oversight Board occasionally 
using conference software for a more face-to-face feel, but I hope we will 
continue using IRC for most community business for the above reasons (and the 
ones Ben mentioned).
Just my two cents,
Chris

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ben Shum 
> wrote:

It's a reasonable question and one we should continue to evaluate over time.

One reason we did not always like products like gotomeeting, etc. was cost. 
While community volunteers could grant access to their organizations resources, 
the community itself never decided to spend money on platforms. Freenode IRC is 
free to use.

Another reason is cross platform compatibility; some of us used Linux 
workstations and these did not always play nicely with those applications.

After this many years on IRC, it's second nature to me, but I also see the 
value considering alternative solutions if we can work through all the 
logistics and continue to keep barriers of access to a minimum.

-- Ben

Sent from my Nexus 6
On May 9, 2016 12:01 PM, 
"scott.tho...@sparkpa.org" 
> wrote:
I’d like to ask a general question about this since I am still fairly new to 
the community. Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as an 
on-line meeting venue? The one time I used it I found it disconcerting in its 
antiquated look and feel and had difficulty with the etiquette. Why not use 
GoToMeeting, Blackboard Collaborate, or a similar product? The chat interface 
in these products is much closer to what most of us are used to and it would 
add in the possibility of using VOIP and screen sharing. I’ve been curious 
about this for a while

Scott


Scott Thomas
Executive Director
PaILS / SPARK
(717) 873-9461
scott.tho...@sparkpa.org
[Description: Description: Training | SPARK – Pennsylvania's Statewide Library 
System]



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org]
 On Behalf Of Barbara Cormack
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group 
>
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara


On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart 
> wrote:
Yes please I missed the last one

Stuart

From: Open-ils-general 

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Jason Etheridge]

>Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as an on-line meeting 
>venue?

Also, because the developers are there, and they're there for cultural
reasons in addition to the practical reasons.

And who doesn't like IRC "bots"? :)

-- 
Jason Etheridge
| Community and Migration Manager
| Equinox Software - Open Your Library
| 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| ja...@esilibrary.com
| http://www.esilibrary.com

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Holly Brennan]

I’ll chime in, too, as a relative newcomer -

IRC was completely new to me three years ago, but I found it easy to learn the 
more “advanced” ins-and-outs (because there’s really nothing to learn when all 
you want to do is ask a question) . I like being able to hop on using any 
browser or program I want, with nothing to install, anytime I’ve needed to.

Sadly, I cannot say the same for any of the fancier meeting platforms. Most 
webinars I’ve used on these platforms require 15 minutes at the beginning of 
the session to explain how to chat/alert/etc, and there is usually someone who 
can’t connect to one or more parts. I have found myself in those situations, 
and I consider myself quite tech-savvy.

I love the simplicity (and yes, antiquity) of the IRC interface! (And there are 
many other benefits, as already stated)

-Holly


Holly Brennan
Technology Specialist
Homer Public Library

hbren...@cityofhomer-ak.gov
907-435-3154 (direct)
907-235-3180 (main desk)



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Chris 
Sharp
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 9:46 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

A couple of pro-IRC points to consider as well:
- conversations are publicly logged and web-searchable
- despite the apparent intimidation factor for new users (mitigated by sessions 
like Yamil so generously offers), it's a low point of entry
- can accommodate hundreds (or thousands) of users who can participate in real 
time, making meetings truly public (the most I've seen teleconferencing 
software accommodate is maybe 15, increasing costs for whoever is hosting the 
meeting)
I'm open to individual committees or the Evergreen Oversight Board occasionally 
using conference software for a more face-to-face feel, but I hope we will 
continue using IRC for most community business for the above reasons (and the 
ones Ben mentioned).
Just my two cents,
Chris

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ben Shum 
> wrote:

It's a reasonable question and one we should continue to evaluate over time.

One reason we did not always like products like gotomeeting, etc. was cost. 
While community volunteers could grant access to their organizations resources, 
the community itself never decided to spend money on platforms. Freenode IRC is 
free to use.

Another reason is cross platform compatibility; some of us used Linux 
workstations and these did not always play nicely with those applications.

After this many years on IRC, it's second nature to me, but I also see the 
value considering alternative solutions if we can work through all the 
logistics and continue to keep barriers of access to a minimum.

-- Ben

Sent from my Nexus 6
On May 9, 2016 12:01 PM, 
"scott.tho...@sparkpa.org" 
> wrote:
I’d like to ask a general question about this since I am still fairly new to 
the community. Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as an 
on-line meeting venue? The one time I used it I found it disconcerting in its 
antiquated look and feel and had difficulty with the etiquette. Why not use 
GoToMeeting, Blackboard Collaborate, or a similar product? The chat interface 
in these products is much closer to what most of us are used to and it would 
add in the possibility of using VOIP and screen sharing. I’ve been curious 
about this for a while

Scott


Scott Thomas
Executive Director
PaILS / SPARK
(717) 873-9461
scott.tho...@sparkpa.org
[Description: Description: Training | SPARK – Pennsylvania's Statewide Library 
System]



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org]
 On Behalf Of Barbara Cormack
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group 
>
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara


On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart 
> wrote:
Yes please I missed the last one

Stuart

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org]
 On Behalf Of Yamil Suarez
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

Hello,

Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of folks 
trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a second 
practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there was 

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Chris Sharp]

A couple of pro-IRC points to consider as well:

- conversations are publicly logged and web-searchable
- despite the apparent intimidation factor for new users (mitigated by
sessions like Yamil so generously offers), it's a low point of entry
- can accommodate hundreds (or thousands) of users who can participate in
real time, making meetings truly public (the most I've seen
teleconferencing software accommodate is maybe 15, increasing costs for
whoever is hosting the meeting)

I'm open to individual committees or the Evergreen Oversight Board
occasionally using conference software for a more face-to-face feel, but I
hope we will continue using IRC for most community business for the above
reasons (and the ones Ben mentioned).

Just my two cents,

Chris

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ben Shum  wrote:

> It's a reasonable question and one we should continue to evaluate over
> time.
>
> One reason we did not always like products like gotomeeting, etc. was
> cost. While community volunteers could grant access to their organizations
> resources, the community itself never decided to spend money on platforms.
> Freenode IRC is free to use.
>
> Another reason is cross platform compatibility; some of us used Linux
> workstations and these did not always play nicely with those applications.
>
> After this many years on IRC, it's second nature to me, but I also see the
> value considering alternative solutions if we can work through all the
> logistics and continue to keep barriers of access to a minimum.
>
> -- Ben
>
> Sent from my Nexus 6
> On May 9, 2016 12:01 PM, "scott.tho...@sparkpa.org" <
> scott.tho...@sparkpa.org> wrote:
>
> I’d like to ask a general question about this since I am still fairly new
> to the community. Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as
> an on-line meeting venue? The one time I used it I found it disconcerting
> in its antiquated look and feel and had difficulty with the etiquette. Why
> not use GoToMeeting, Blackboard Collaborate, or a similar product? The chat
> interface in these products is much closer to what most of us are used to
> and it would add in the possibility of using VOIP and screen sharing. I’ve
> been curious about this for a while
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> Scott Thomas
>
> Executive Director
>
> *PaILS / SPARK*
>
> (717) 873-9461
>
> scott.tho...@sparkpa.org
>
> [image: Description: Description: Training | SPARK – Pennsylvania's
> Statewide Library System] 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:
> open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Barbara
> Cormack
> *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2016 12:46 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group <
> open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice
> time?
>
>
>
> I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart 
> wrote:
>
> Yes please I missed the last one
>
>
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:
> open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Yamil
> Suarez
> *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice
> time?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of
> folks trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a
> second practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there
> was community interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on
> this list that may want to learn.
>
>
>
> I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to
> join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning
> too.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Yamil
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Barbara Cormack
>
> Project Manager
>
> *Equinox Software - Open Your Library*
>
> 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>
> barb...@esilibrary.com
> www.esilibrary.com
>
>


-- 
Chris Sharp
PINES System Administrator
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
(404) 235-7147

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Ben Shum]

It's a reasonable question and one we should continue to evaluate over
time.

One reason we did not always like products like gotomeeting, etc. was cost.
While community volunteers could grant access to their organizations
resources, the community itself never decided to spend money on platforms.
Freenode IRC is free to use.

Another reason is cross platform compatibility; some of us used Linux
workstations and these did not always play nicely with those applications.

After this many years on IRC, it's second nature to me, but I also see the
value considering alternative solutions if we can work through all the
logistics and continue to keep barriers of access to a minimum.

-- Ben

Sent from my Nexus 6
On May 9, 2016 12:01 PM, "scott.tho...@sparkpa.org" <
scott.tho...@sparkpa.org> wrote:

I’d like to ask a general question about this since I am still fairly new
to the community. Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as
an on-line meeting venue? The one time I used it I found it disconcerting
in its antiquated look and feel and had difficulty with the etiquette. Why
not use GoToMeeting, Blackboard Collaborate, or a similar product? The chat
interface in these products is much closer to what most of us are used to
and it would add in the possibility of using VOIP and screen sharing. I’ve
been curious about this for a while



Scott





Scott Thomas

Executive Director

*PaILS / SPARK*

(717) 873-9461

scott.tho...@sparkpa.org

[image: Description: Description: Training | SPARK – Pennsylvania's
Statewide Library System] 







*From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:
open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Barbara
Cormack
*Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2016 12:46 PM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group 
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice
time?



I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara





On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart  wrote:

Yes please I missed the last one



Stuart



*From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:
open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Yamil
Suarez
*Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
*To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
*Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?



Hello,



Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of folks
trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a second
practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there was
community interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on
this list that may want to learn.



I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to
join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning
too.



Thanks in advance,

Yamil











-- 

Barbara Cormack

Project Manager

*Equinox Software - Open Your Library*

1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)

barb...@esilibrary.com
www.esilibrary.com

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[scott.tho...@sparkpa.org]

I’d like to ask a general question about this since I am still fairly new to 
the community. Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as an 
on-line meeting venue? The one time I used it I found it disconcerting in its 
antiquated look and feel and had difficulty with the etiquette. Why not use 
GoToMeeting, Blackboard Collaborate, or a similar product? The chat interface 
in these products is much closer to what most of us are used to and it would 
add in the possibility of using VOIP and screen sharing. I’ve been curious 
about this for a while

Scott


Scott Thomas
Executive Director
PaILS / SPARK
(717) 873-9461
scott.tho...@sparkpa.org
[Description: Description: Training | SPARK – Pennsylvania's Statewide Library 
System]



From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of 
Barbara Cormack
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group 
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara


On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart 
> wrote:
Yes please I missed the last one

Stuart

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org]
 On Behalf Of Yamil Suarez
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

Hello,

Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of folks 
trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a second 
practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there was community 
interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on this list that 
may want to learn.

I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to 
join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning too.

Thanks in advance,
Yamil






--
Barbara Cormack
Project Manager
Equinox Software - Open Your Library
1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
barb...@esilibrary.com
www.esilibrary.com

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Barbara Cormack]

I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara


On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart  wrote:

> Yes please I missed the last one
>
>
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:
> open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Yamil
> Suarez
> *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice
> time?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of
> folks trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a
> second practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there
> was community interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on
> this list that may want to learn.
>
>
>
> I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to
> join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning
> too.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Yamil
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Barbara Cormack
Project Manager
*Equinox Software - Open Your Library*
1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
barb...@esilibrary.com
www.esilibrary.com

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Forrest, Stuart]

Yes please I missed the last one

Stuart

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Yamil 
Suarez
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

Hello,

Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of folks 
trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a second 
practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there was community 
interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on this list that 
may want to learn.

I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to 
join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning too.

Thanks in advance,
Yamil

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

[Yamil Suarez]

Hello,

Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of folks
trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a second
practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there was
community interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on
this list that may want to learn.

I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to
join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning
too.

Thanks in advance,
Yamil