Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Open-ils-general Digest, Vol 135, Issue 13

[Jayaraj JR]

Re: Sending SMS from Evergreen ILS

Is it possible to open a web URL in the server while an event triggers in
action trigger mechanism. If possible, we may be able to find the solution.

On 9 September 2017 at 21:30, <
open-ils-general-requ...@list.georgialibraries.org> wrote:

> Send Open-ils-general mailing list submissions to
> open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/mailman/
> listinfo/open-ils-general
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> open-ils-general-requ...@list.georgialibraries.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> open-ils-general-ow...@list.georgialibraries.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Open-ils-general digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Sending SMS from Evergreen ILS (Jayaraj JR)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jayaraj JR 
> To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 12:31:33 +0530
> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Sending SMS from Evergreen ILS
> Hello,
>
> We are provided with a WEB API like
> http://serviceproviderapi.in/api/user?id=$api_id&senderid=$
> senderid&to=$numbers&msg=$message&port=$portinstead of SMS EMail gateway
> Address by our service provider. Is it possible to configure using the
> provided web API in Evergreen ILS for sending SMS.
>
> I also tried to open the web address after replacing the variable values
> manually using process template reactor with action trigger mechnism. Is
> there any way to open a web address while an event triggers.
>
>
> Kindly instruct us how we can proceed with a WEB API for SMS configuration
> in Evergreen ILS.
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Jayaraj J R
> Library Information Assistant
> IISER Thiruvananthapuram
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards

Jayaraj J R
Library Information Assistant
IISER Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala, India

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation

[Rogan Hamby]

If you have circulations in both tables and want a complete picture, then
yes.  If you are on a version with the action.all_circulation view then it
combines data from both for a single reporting source.


Rogan Hamby

Data and Project Analyst

Equinox Open Library Initiative

phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)

email:  ro...@equinoxinitiative.org
web:  http://EquinoxInitiative.org

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:37 PM,  wrote:

> So, if I run a circulation report for a month from a few years ago, do I
> need to run an aged report too to get all the relevant data?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Kathy Lussier" 
> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 4:47pm
> To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> It's likely that this information is not available in the documentation,
> but if anyone has the inclination to essentially copy what Jason said into
> Asciidoc so that it can be included, I'm sure others would appreciate it!
>
> If anyone is interested, I would happy to work with you on it to point you
> in the right direction for how the documentation gets done.
>
> Have a nice weekend!
>
> Kathy
>
> On 09/01/2017 05:41 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
>
> Thank you very much.  This is very helpful.  Wish I could have found it in
> the documentation and not bothered anyone.  One day I will figure out how
> to find stuff in the documentation 😊
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-
> boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
> ] On Behalf Of Jason
> Stephenson
> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation
>
>
>
> On 09/01/2017 04:50 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
>
> > Okay.  Thanks.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > So there is no duplication?   Everything in aged_circulation was once in
>
> > circulation and is moved, not copied, to aged_circulation?  It just
>
> > loses some of the info?  Or is it copied and everything in
>
> > aged_circulation is still in circulation, assuming one hasn’t deleted
>
> > rows in circulation?
>
>
>
> There is no duplication. The action.aged_circulation is for statistical
> reporting while breaking the link to the patron who had the item checked
> out.
>
>
>
> Circulations get moved under three circumstances in stock Evergreen:
>
>
>
> 1. A patron is deleted. This moves all of the patron's circulations from
> action.circulation to action.aged_circulation
>
>
>
> 2. A row or row(s) in action.circulation are deleted. The
> action.age_circ_on_delete trigger moves deleted action.circulations to
> action.aged_circulation.
>
>
>
> 3. The action.purge_circulations function is run. This function is meant
> to be run periodically to enforce patron privacy. It's behavior is
> controlled by two internal flags: history.circ.retention_age and
> history.circ.retention_count. The purge_circulations function is often run
> from cron via the purge_circulations.srfsh script. NOTE: This function will
> take a *long* time to run for the first time on a system that has had much
> activity. The srfsh script will likely time out before the database
> function finishes and nothing will get moved.
>
>
>
> If you have not been doing 2 or 3, then the aged_circulation entries you
> see are likely because of 1.
>
>
>
> You can delete rows from action.aged_circulation if you wish. Keep in mind
> that this could lead to the loss of statistical information depending on
> what reports you use.
>
>
>
> HtH,
>
> Jason
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Jim
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > *From:* Open-ils-general
>
> > [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
> ] *On Behalf
>
> > Of *Rogan Hamby
>
> > *Sent:* Friday, September 1, 2017 1:54 PM
>
> > *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
>
> > 
>
> > *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Hi Jim, Benjamin,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > There are a number of differences that touch on aged versus not-aged
>
> > circulations.  It's certainly true that circulations can be moved out
>
> > of action.circulation to keep that table size down and that can be
>
> > useful when we discuss things like tablespaces and Postgres.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > However, to me the major difference is that the action.circulation
>
> > table attaches back to the actor.usr table, i.e. there is a link
>
> > between the patron and the circulation.  That link goes bye bye when a
>
> > circ is moved to action.aged_circulation.  Some patron information is
>
> > recorded in aged circulations for future statistical reporting
>
> > purposes such as the user's post code, home org unit, profile group
>
> > and birth year but the patron themselves is no longer identifiable.
>
> > Obviously, this can be of significant value for patron privacy.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Rogan Hamby
>
> >
>
> > Data and Project Analyst
>
> >
>
> > Equinox Open Library Initi

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation

[jmundy]

So, if I run a circulation report for a month from a few years ago, do I need 
to run an aged report too to get all the relevant data?

 
Thanks,
John


-Original Message-
From: "Kathy Lussier" 
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 4:47pm
To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation




Hi Jim,
It's likely that this information is not available in the documentation, but if 
anyone has the inclination to essentially copy what Jason said into Asciidoc so 
that it can be included, I'm sure others would appreciate it!
If anyone is interested, I would happy to work with you on it to point you in 
the right direction for how the documentation gets done.
Have a nice weekend!
Kathy

On 09/01/2017 05:41 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:


Thank you very much.  This is very helpful.  Wish I could have found it in the 
documentation and not bothered anyone.  One day I will figure out how to find 
stuff in the documentation 😊
 
Jim
 
-Original Message-
 From: Open-ils-general [[ 
mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org ]( 
mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org )] On Behalf Of Jason 
Stephenson
 Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 4:15 PM
 To: [ open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org ]( 
mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org )
 Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation
 
On 09/01/2017 04:50 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
> Okay.  Thanks.
>
> 
>
> So there is no duplication?   Everything in aged_circulation was once in
> circulation and is moved, not copied, to aged_circulation?  It just
> loses some of the info?  Or is it copied and everything in
> aged_circulation is still in circulation, assuming one hasn’t deleted
> rows in circulation?
 
There is no duplication. The action.aged_circulation is for statistical 
reporting while breaking the link to the patron who had the item checked out.
 
Circulations get moved under three circumstances in stock Evergreen:
 
1. A patron is deleted. This moves all of the patron's circulations from 
action.circulation to action.aged_circulation
 
2. A row or row(s) in action.circulation are deleted. The 
action.age_circ_on_delete trigger moves deleted action.circulations to 
action.aged_circulation.
 
3. The action.purge_circulations function is run. This function is meant to be 
run periodically to enforce patron privacy. It's behavior is controlled by two 
internal flags: history.circ.retention_age and history.circ.retention_count. 
The purge_circulations function is often run from cron via the 
purge_circulations.srfsh script. NOTE: This function will take a *long* time to 
run for the first time on a system that has had much activity. The srfsh script 
will likely time out before the database function finishes and nothing will get 
moved.
 
If you have not been doing 2 or 3, then the aged_circulation entries you see 
are likely because of 1.
 
You can delete rows from action.aged_circulation if you wish. Keep in mind that 
this could lead to the loss of statistical information depending on what 
reports you use.
 
HtH,
Jason
>
> 
>
> Jim
>
> 
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general
> [[ mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org ]( 
> mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org )] *On Behalf
> Of *Rogan Hamby
> *Sent:* Friday, September 1, 2017 1:54 PM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> <[ open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org ]( 
> mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org )>
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Aged_Circulation
>
> 
>
> Hi Jim, Benjamin,
>
> 
>
> There are a number of differences that touch on aged versus not-aged
> circulations.  It's certainly true that circulations can be moved out
> of action.circulation to keep that table size down and that can be
> useful when we discuss things like tablespaces and Postgres.
>
> 
>
> However, to me the major difference is that the action.circulation
> table attaches back to the actor.usr table, i.e. there is a link
> between the patron and the circulation.  That link goes bye bye when a
> circ is moved to action.aged_circulation.  Some patron information is
> recorded in aged circulations for future statistical reporting
> purposes such as the user's post code, home org unit, profile group
> and birth year but the patron themselves is no longer identifiable. 
> Obviously, this can be of significant value for patron privacy.
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
> Rogan Hamby
>
> Data and Project Analyst
>
> Equinox Open Library Initiative
>
> phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>
> email:  [ ro...@equinoxinitiative.org ]( mailto:ro...@equinoxinitiative.org )
> <[ mailto:ro...@equinoxinitiative.org ]( mailto:ro...@equinoxinitiative.org )>
>
> web:  [ http://EquinoxInitiative.org ]( http://EquinoxInitiative.org )
>
> 
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Murphy, Benjamin
> <[ benjamin.mur...@ncdcr.gov  mailto:benjamin.mur...@ncdcr.gov%20%3cmailto:benjamin.mur...@ncdcr.gov )>> 
> wrote

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] On the Road to 3.0: Small Enhancements to Improve the Staff Experience

[Millissa Macomber]

Thank you, to the outreach committee! This is a great video. Excited to share 
it with our staff members. 


Millissa Macomber
Technical Services Coordinator
Burlington Public Library
millis...@burlingtonwa.gov

-Original Message-
From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Kathy 
Lussier
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 9:58 AM
To: 'Evergreen Discussion Group'
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] On the Road to 3.0: Small Enhancements to Improve 
the Staff Experience

Hi all,

We are all excited about yesterday's beta release for 3.0 and all of the 
wonderful improvements we're going to see in Evergreen!

Over the next few weeks, the Evergreen Outreach Committee will be highlighting 
some of our favorite new features you will all be seeing in
3.0 in a video series called On the Road to 3.0. Although the web client is the 
most notable change coming with the release, there are many other changes big 
and small that will bring benefits to your libraries.  In the first installment 
of this series, we highlight some small, quality-of-life improvements that will 
improve the experience for staff.

You can view the video on our new YouTube Channel at 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC83L8WyXoj8Kf9hShdDY61A. Do you want to be the 
first to know of new videos added to the series? Be sure to subscribe to the 
YouTube channel to be informed of our latest uploads!

Kathy


--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier

[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Sandbox for Bug Squashing Day

[Kathy Lussier]

Hi all,

We didn't get many requests for Sandboxes this week. Since I had a spare 
Sandbox that wasn't being used, I added some bug fixes to it in case 
anyone has time to test the fixes. The available bug fixes are listed below:


 * Setting default record view to "MARC Edit" causes problems when
   record is retrieved by TCN
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1708951
 * web client: shelving location selector in volume/copy editor should
   display owning org unit
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1713151
 * Web Client: Adding bill without billing type fails silently
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1712646
 * Fix for Web Client Copy Editor Fix
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1714390

If you decide to test one of these bug fixes, please assign yourself to 
the bug so that we don't duplicate efforts. More information about 
testing bugs is available at 
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=dev:bug_squashing#testing_bugs


Sandbox: https://mlnc3.noblenet.org/
Web Client login page: https://mlnc3.noblenet.org/eg/staff/
Admin login: admin / evergreen123
Other logins are available at 
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=qa:concerto_logins


Happy testing!

Kathy

--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Zebra TLP2824 plus - output issue

[Garry Collum]

We have some from Computype with a product number of 1038224. There's
really no other markings on these, other than the size.  We have also
ordered wax ribbon from Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009YBO4W6/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

We have had no problems with either.

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Josh Stompro 
wrote:

> Hello Garry, do you use the wax ribbon or direct thermal?  Could you also
> tell me the product numbers of your supplies please.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Josh Stompro - LARL IT Director
>
>
>
> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-
> boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Garry Collum
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:08 AM
> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Zebra TLP2824 plus - output issue
>
>
>
> Hi Josh,
>
>
>
> We have never had this problem.  We have 5 TLP2824 plus printers.  But our
> labels are 1 x 1.5
>
>
>
> Garry
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Josh Stompro 
> wrote:
>
> Hello, does anyone use the Zebra TLP2824 plus printer for your
> spine/pocket labels?  We have two of them and they have this odd behavior
> of shading the bottom 1/3 of the first label that gets printed, like the
> print head is pre-heating and transferring the ribbon when it first starts.
>
>
>
> One of them has it very faintly, which we have just lived with, while the
> other has it worse off.  They were manufactured months apart, not from the
> same batch.
>
>
>
> I just had the worse off one sent in for repair, and it was returned, and
> the repair sheet says that parts were replaced, but the same problem is
> there still.  The testing labels that they printed out and included with it
> also show the problem.
>
>
>
> I’m just wondering if this is normal for this model… and if we should be
> looking at getting a different model printer?
>
>
>
> We are using 5319 wax ribbon and Zebra labels Z-Select 4000T 2.25x1.25.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org
>
> Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139
>
> LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Zebra TLP2824 plus - output issue

[Josh Stompro]

Hello Garry, do you use the wax ribbon or direct thermal?  Could you also tell 
me the product numbers of your supplies please.

Thanks

Josh Stompro - LARL IT Director

From: Open-ils-general 
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Garry 
Collum
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:08 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Zebra TLP2824 plus - output issue

Hi Josh,

We have never had this problem.  We have 5 TLP2824 plus printers.  But our 
labels are 1 x 1.5

Garry

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Josh Stompro 
mailto:stomp...@exchange.larl.org>> wrote:
Hello, does anyone use the Zebra TLP2824 plus printer for your spine/pocket 
labels?  We have two of them and they have this odd behavior of shading the 
bottom 1/3 of the first label that gets printed, like the print head is 
pre-heating and transferring the ribbon when it first starts.

One of them has it very faintly, which we have just lived with, while the other 
has it worse off.  They were manufactured months apart, not from the same batch.

I just had the worse off one sent in for repair, and it was returned, and the 
repair sheet says that parts were replaced, but the same problem is there 
still.  The testing labels that they printed out and included with it also show 
the problem.

I’m just wondering if this is normal for this model… and if we should be 
looking at getting a different model printer?

We are using 5319 wax ribbon and Zebra labels Z-Select 4000T 2.25x1.25.

Thanks
Josh

Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org
Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139
LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Zebra TLP2824 plus - output issue

[Garry Collum]

Hi Josh,

We have never had this problem.  We have 5 TLP2824 plus printers.  But our
labels are 1 x 1.5

Garry

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Josh Stompro 
wrote:

> Hello, does anyone use the Zebra TLP2824 plus printer for your
> spine/pocket labels?  We have two of them and they have this odd behavior
> of shading the bottom 1/3 of the first label that gets printed, like the
> print head is pre-heating and transferring the ribbon when it first starts.
>
>
>
> One of them has it very faintly, which we have just lived with, while the
> other has it worse off.  They were manufactured months apart, not from the
> same batch.
>
>
>
> I just had the worse off one sent in for repair, and it was returned, and
> the repair sheet says that parts were replaced, but the same problem is
> there still.  The testing labels that they printed out and included with it
> also show the problem.
>
>
>
> I’m just wondering if this is normal for this model… and if we should be
> looking at getting a different model printer?
>
>
>
> We are using 5319 wax ribbon and Zebra labels Z-Select 4000T 2.25x1.25.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org
>
> Josh Stompro | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139
>
> LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110
>
>
>

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OpenSRF 2.5.1 released

[Dan Scott]

Awesome, thanks!

On Sep 12, 2017 9:04 AM, "Galen Charlton"  wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Dan Scott  wrote:
> > Does upgrading OpenSRF from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1 just require a restart of
> > Evergreen to pick up the changes via the shared libraries, or is a
> recompile
> > of Evergreen required as well?
>
> Restarting Evergreen services should be sufficient.
>
> Regards,
>
> Galen
> --
> Galen Charlton
> Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
> Equinox Open Library Initiative
> phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
> email:  g...@equinoxinitiative.org
> web:  https://equinoxInitiative.org
> direct: +1 770-709-5581
> cell:   +1 404-984-4366
>

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OpenSRF 2.5.1 released

[Galen Charlton]

Hi Dan,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Dan Scott  wrote:
> Does upgrading OpenSRF from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1 just require a restart of
> Evergreen to pick up the changes via the shared libraries, or is a recompile
> of Evergreen required as well?

Restarting Evergreen services should be sufficient.

Regards,

Galen
-- 
Galen Charlton
Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
Equinox Open Library Initiative
phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
email:  g...@equinoxinitiative.org
web:  https://equinoxInitiative.org
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell:   +1 404-984-4366

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is MassLNC community demo server up?

[Linda Jansova]

Great to hear that!

Thank you for letting us know :-)!

Linda

On 09/12/2017 02:26 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:


Hi all,

I'm happy to report that the demo server is back up again and is 
running 2.12.5. Access information is available at 
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=community_servers.


Many thanks to Jason Stephenson of C/W MARS for getting it back in 
working order!


Kathy


On 08/28/2017 10:03 AM, Linda Jansova wrote:


Thank you, Kathy!

And yes, Equinox's demo server works okay!

Linda

On 08/28/2017 03:47 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:


Hi,

Yes, the MassLNC demo server is down, and I don't have an estimated 
time on when we'll have it back up again. I'm going to remove the 
server's access information until we get the problem addressed.


It looks like Equinox's demo server at 
https://demo.evergreencatalog.com/ is up and running with 2.12.1.


Apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused!

Kathy


On 08/28/2017 12:51 AM, Linda Jansova wrote:


Thank you, Terran!

Linda

On 08/28/2017 01:04 AM, Terran McCanna wrote:

Yes, it's been down for a week or so.

Terran McCanna
PINES Program Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345
404-235-7138
tmcca...@georgialibraries.org 


On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Linda Jansova > wrote:


Hi,

just a quick check - is MassLNC community demo server up?

I have been trying to load https://mlnc2.noblenet.org/ and
also https://mlnc2.noblenet.org/eg/staff/home
 (URLs are taken
from
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=community_servers
)
in my browser but nothing shows up...

Linda






--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier




--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OpenSRF 2.5.1 released

[Dan Scott]

Does upgrading OpenSRF from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1 just require a restart of
Evergreen to pick up the changes via the shared libraries, or is a
recompile of Evergreen required as well?

On Sep 11, 2017 5:30 PM, "Galen Charlton"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> OpenSRF 2.5.1 is now available. 2.5.1 is a major bugfix release that
> resolves a problem wherein messages could sometimes get dropped.  All
> users of 2.5.0, including folks testing the Evergreen 3.0 beta
> release, are advised to upgrade to 2.5.1 as soon as possible.
>
> For additional information, please see the full release announcement at
>
> https://evergreen-ils.org/opensrf-2-5-1-released/
>
> Regards,
>
> Galen
> --
> Galen Charlton
> Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
> Equinox Open Library Initiative
> phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
> email:  g...@equinoxinitiative.org
> web:  https://equinoxInitiative.org
> direct: +1 770-709-5581
> cell:   +1 404-984-4366
>

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is MassLNC community demo server up?

[Kathy Lussier]

Hi all,

I'm happy to report that the demo server is back up again and is running 
2.12.5. Access information is available at 
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=community_servers.


Many thanks to Jason Stephenson of C/W MARS for getting it back in 
working order!


Kathy


On 08/28/2017 10:03 AM, Linda Jansova wrote:


Thank you, Kathy!

And yes, Equinox's demo server works okay!

Linda

On 08/28/2017 03:47 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:


Hi,

Yes, the MassLNC demo server is down, and I don't have an estimated 
time on when we'll have it back up again. I'm going to remove the 
server's access information until we get the problem addressed.


It looks like Equinox's demo server at 
https://demo.evergreencatalog.com/ is up and running with 2.12.1.


Apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused!

Kathy


On 08/28/2017 12:51 AM, Linda Jansova wrote:


Thank you, Terran!

Linda

On 08/28/2017 01:04 AM, Terran McCanna wrote:

Yes, it's been down for a week or so.

Terran McCanna
PINES Program Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345
404-235-7138
tmcca...@georgialibraries.org 


On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Linda Jansova > wrote:


Hi,

just a quick check - is MassLNC community demo server up?

I have been trying to load https://mlnc2.noblenet.org/ and also
https://mlnc2.noblenet.org/eg/staff/home
 (URLs are taken from
https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=community_servers
)
in my browser but nothing shows up...

Linda






--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier




--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
kluss...@masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OpenSRF 2.5.1 released

[Galen Charlton]

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Linda Jansova  wrote:
> At this moment I would like to suggest a little correction - the link from
> "release notes" in the release announcement
> (https://evergreen-ils.org/opensrf-2-5-1-released/) currently goes to
> https://evergreen-ils.org/documentation/release/OpenSRF/RELEASE_NOTES_2_5_0.html
> but should probably go to
> https://evergreen-ils.org/documentation/release/OpenSRF/RELEASE_NOTES_2_5_1.html
> instead.

The copy/paste gremlin strikes again! Thanks for pointing this out;
I've corrected the post.

Regards,

Galen
-- 
Galen Charlton
Infrastructure and Added Services Manager
Equinox Open Library Initiative
phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
email:  g...@equinoxinitiative.org
web:  https://equinoxInitiative.org
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell:   +1 404-984-4366

Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OpenSRF 2.5.1 released

[Linda Jansova]

Thank you, Galen! We shall definitely use it for testing 3.0!

At this moment I would like to suggest a little correction - the link 
from "release notes" in the release announcement 
(https://evergreen-ils.org/opensrf-2-5-1-released/) currently goes to 
https://evergreen-ils.org/documentation/release/OpenSRF/RELEASE_NOTES_2_5_0.html 
but should probably go to 
https://evergreen-ils.org/documentation/release/OpenSRF/RELEASE_NOTES_2_5_1.html 
instead.


Linda

On 09/11/2017 11:30 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:

Hi,

OpenSRF 2.5.1 is now available. 2.5.1 is a major bugfix release that
resolves a problem wherein messages could sometimes get dropped.  All
users of 2.5.0, including folks testing the Evergreen 3.0 beta
release, are advised to upgrade to 2.5.1 as soon as possible.

For additional information, please see the full release announcement at

https://evergreen-ils.org/opensrf-2-5-1-released/

Regards,

Galen