Questions about terminology model
Thanks, Pablo! Let's continue our discussion on the wiki and raise a CR for the support RM specs if it's not done already. Cheers, Rong 2009/12/4 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com: Hi rong, When I saw the API and the structure of the openehr_terminology_en I thought something is wrong here, then I see the Java Ref Impl of the mini termserv with your comments about methods that can't be implemented with this terminology model, here I think I'm right :D If you want we can discuss the topic on the mail list or on the wiki, I think we can correct the model in a few weeks, making an implementable and usable model/API. Cheers, Pablo. BTW: congrats for you PHD! Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:06:05 +0100 Subject: Re: Questions about terminology model From: rong.acode at gmail.com To: openehr-technical at openehr.org Hi Pablo, Yes, you are right. Code sets are language independent. See my comment in the java implementation: http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_java/TRUNK/mini-termserv/src/main/java/org/openehr/terminology/SimpleCodeSetAccess.java I think I have created an JIRA issue on this but couldn't find it now. Cheers, Rong 2009/11/28 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com: I need to implement the access for various terminologies, included the OpenEHR terminology. I've derived a class model from the openehr_terminology_en.xml but it seems this model is not compatible with the API proposed in support_im.pdf As an example, in openehr_terminology_en.xml, terminology is the only element that has a language, but in support_im.pdf, the CODE_SET_ACCESS class has an operation has_lang( lang ), but the code sets have no language to do this search. I have a question here, is it correct that a code set have a language? and code sets and codes are not language independent? I think the only language-dependent item is the description of the code, so I think that both openehr_terminology_en.xml and support_im.pdf have some bugs to fix, is it correct? And here are questions based on my ignorance, what's the difference between Group and CodeSet? and what's the difference between Code and Concept? Thanks a lot, Pablo Pazos Gutierrez Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical Keep your friends updated? even when you?re not signed in. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
Questions about terminology model
Hi Pablo, Yes, you are right. Code sets are language independent. See my comment in the java implementation: http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_java/TRUNK/mini-termserv/src/main/java/org/openehr/terminology/SimpleCodeSetAccess.java I think I have created an JIRA issue on this but couldn't find it now. Cheers, Rong 2009/11/28 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com: I need to implement the access for various terminologies, included the OpenEHR terminology. I've derived a class model from the openehr_terminology_en.xml but it seems this model is not compatible with the API proposed in support_im.pdf As an example, in openehr_terminology_en.xml, terminology is the only element that has a language, but in support_im.pdf, the CODE_SET_ACCESS class has an operation has_lang( lang ), but the code sets have no language to do this search. I have a question here, is it correct that a code set have a language? and code sets and codes are not language independent? I think the only language-dependent item is the description of the code, so I think that both openehr_terminology_en.xml and support_im.pdf have some bugs to fix, is it correct? And here are questions based on my ignorance, what's the difference between Group and CodeSet? and what's the difference between Code and Concept? Thanks a lot, Pablo Pazos Gutierrez Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
Questions about terminology model
Hi rong, When I saw the API and the structure of the openehr_terminology_en I thought something is wrong here, then I see the Java Ref Impl of the mini termserv with your comments about methods that can't be implemented with this terminology model, here I think I'm right :D If you want we can discuss the topic on the mail list or on the wiki, I think we can correct the model in a few weeks, making an implementable and usable model/API. Cheers,Pablo. BTW: congrats for you PHD! Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:06:05 +0100 Subject: Re: Questions about terminology model From: rong.acode at gmail.com To: openehr-technical at openehr.org Hi Pablo, Yes, you are right. Code sets are language independent. See my comment in the java implementation: http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_java/TRUNK/mini-termserv/src/main/java/org/openehr/terminology/SimpleCodeSetAccess.java I think I have created an JIRA issue on this but couldn't find it now. Cheers, Rong 2009/11/28 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com: I need to implement the access for various terminologies, included the OpenEHR terminology. I've derived a class model from the openehr_terminology_en.xml but it seems this model is not compatible with the API proposed in support_im.pdf As an example, in openehr_terminology_en.xml, terminology is the only element that has a language, but in support_im.pdf, the CODE_SET_ACCESS class has an operation has_lang( lang ), but the code sets have no language to do this search. I have a question here, is it correct that a code set have a language? and code sets and codes are not language independent? I think the only language-dependent item is the description of the code, so I think that both openehr_terminology_en.xml and support_im.pdf have some bugs to fix, is it correct? And here are questions based on my ignorance, what's the difference between Group and CodeSet? and what's the difference between Code and Concept? Thanks a lot, Pablo Pazos Gutierrez Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical _ Keep your friends updated?even when you?re not signed in. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_5:092010 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091203/a8fef244/attachment.html
Questions about terminology model
I need to implement the access for various terminologies, included the OpenEHR terminology. I've derived a class model from the openehr_terminology_en.xml but it seems this model is not compatible with the API proposed in support_im.pdf As an example, in openehr_terminology_en.xml, terminology is the only element that has a language, but in support_im.pdf, the CODE_SET_ACCESS class has an operation has_lang( lang ), but the code sets have no language to do this search. I have a question here, is it correct that a code set have a language? and code sets and codes are not language independent? I think the only language-dependent item is the description of the code, so I think that both openehr_terminology_en.xml and support_im.pdf have some bugs to fix, is it correct? And here are questions based on my ignorance, what's the difference between Group and CodeSet? and what's the difference between Code and Concept? Thanks a lot, Pablo Pazos Gutierrez _ Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail you. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091127/7159bef4/attachment.html
