Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Zoltan Kuscsikwrote: > Thanks for the comments. I'm going to clean up the recipes and I'm trying > to upstream some of the > patches to chromium to reduce the maintenance on meta-browser. Awesome :-) I look forward to see those patches ... :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
Thanks for the comments. I'm going to clean up the recipes and I'm trying to upstream some of the patches to chromium to reduce the maintenance on meta-browser. Z On 24 October 2015 at 06:39, Andre McCurdywrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Julien Brianceau (jbriance) > wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. > > > > I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license > declaration in chromium recipes. > > Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through > chromium.inc file. > > Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official > contain third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD > licensed, whereas it is compiled by the recipe. > > > > Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared > in the recipe as well ? > > Yes, they should. The crosswalk browser recipe seems to do a pretty > good job and could be a starting point for other Chromium based > recipes. > > > https://github.com/crosswalk-project/meta-crosswalk/blob/master/recipes-crosswalk/crosswalk/crosswalk_12.40.295.0.bb > > > Regards, > > > > Julien > > -- > > ___ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- > ___ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- Zoltan Kuscsik Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group email: zoltan.kusc...@linaro.org IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Julien Brianceau (jbriance)wrote: > Hi, > >> It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. > > I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license > declaration in chromium recipes. > Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through > chromium.inc file. > Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official contain > third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD licensed, > whereas it is compiled by the recipe. > > Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared in > the recipe as well ? Yes, they should. The crosswalk browser recipe seems to do a pretty good job and could be a starting point for other Chromium based recipes. https://github.com/crosswalk-project/meta-crosswalk/blob/master/recipes-crosswalk/crosswalk/crosswalk_12.40.295.0.bb > Regards, > > Julien > -- > ___ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 4:31 AM, Zoltan Kuscsikwrote: > > Hi, > > I'm working on updating the Chromium recipes to version 45. > > So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit): > > https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser > > It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. > Br, when are you going to post a pull request for these. > > Zoltan > > -- > Zoltan Kuscsik > > Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group > email: zoltan.kusc...@linaro.org > IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org > -- > ___ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
Hi, > It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. I think it would be great to take the opportunity to clarify license declaration in chromium recipes. Currently, LICENSE is set to BSD only for chromium recipes, through chromium.inc file. Archives from http://gsdview.appspot.com/chromium-browser-official contain third party source code (ffmpeg for instance) that is not BSD licensed, whereas it is compiled by the recipe. Shouldn't licenses from 3rd party code compiled by chromium be declared in the recipe as well ? Regards, Julien -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
hi, On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Zoltan Kuscsikwrote: > So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit): > > https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser just for the record.. I am using/testing this set of recipes on IFC6410 (armv7) and DragonBoard 410c (armv8), and so far so good. it would be good if the helper script google-chrome could parse a 'default' config file, so that as a downstream user it is easy for me to hook my own customizations in this script, something like . /etc/default/google-chrome nico -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Zoltan Kuscsikwrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on updating the Chromium recipes to version 45. > > So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit): > > https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser > > It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. xkbcommon change should go into oe-core tc_malloc disabled, should become a PACKAGECONFIG, its a perf tool anyway so disabling it is ok. ozone and VAAPI should also become packageconfigs fix_64_bit_builds.patch assumes gcc, I did not like it for that reason, it could have been done in compiler independent way > Br, > > Zoltan > > -- > Zoltan Kuscsik > > Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group > email: zoltan.kusc...@linaro.org > IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org > -- > ___ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-browser] Recipes draft for Chromium V45 and V47
Hi, I'm working on updating the Chromium recipes to version 45. So far it is tested on Wayland builds (ARM 32bit and ARM 64bit): https://github.com/linaro-home/meta-browser It still needs some cleanup before upstream, comments are welcome. Br, Zoltan -- Zoltan Kuscsik Senior Software Developer, Linaro Digital Home Group email: zoltan.kusc...@linaro.org IRC: zoli_ on irc.linaro.org -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel