Zane, I will fix this (and the other GBP packages) as soon as I possibly
can. I agree it would be better to move the GBP heat support into the
heat repo, either main tree or /contrib, but others on the GBP team
would most likely handle that. Seem reasonable for liberty.
Thanks,
-Bob
On 6/17/15 8:56 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Every day I get an email about broken dependencies for the group-based
policy Heat plugin in Fedora (openstack-heat-gbp), because the version
of Heat it depends on is capped. Two points:
1) Would whoever maintains that package (Bob?) please fix it :)
2) Why was this plugin not submitted to /contrib in the Heat repo so
that it could be continuously tested maintained against the Heat
code base, thus avoiding any compatibility problems with future
versions? This is the entire reason we have /contrib. In fact, if you
think the resources are in close to their final form (i.e. the API is
not super experimental still), I think we may even be willing to
accept them into the main tree at this point.
cheers,
Zane.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
